April 23, 2009MUNICIPALITY OF WEST ELGIN
AGENDA
COUNCIL MEETING
APRIL 23, 2009
Council Chambers, West Elgin Municipal Building
DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
DELEGATIONS:
9:30 a. m. Lorne McLeod re: proposed severance (131)
1:30 p.m. Mr. Pearce, 214 Graham Road re: various issues
2:00 p.m. WESA re: Annual Report (C8a)
2:30 p.m. Grace McGartland re: Arts & Cookery Bank
3:00 p.m. Jeff Slater re: arena parking lot quotes
PLANNING: (131-136)
(See also correspondence items #1 and #2)
1.* Proposed severance - Lot Z, Concession 2
2.* Community Improvement Plan Draft #2 (under separate cover)
3.* Workplan for Class EA for marina improvements (Tables 1 & 2 available at meeting)
4.* Report re: Official Plan modification Seaside Developments
5. Seaside Developments - Submission of Pre-Consultation Report and draft plan
6.* Report re: Storage/Shipping Containers
REPORTS: (C1-C8)
1. ROADS
2. RECREATION
3. BUILDING
April 23, 2009 .............Page 2
4. WATER
5. BY-LAW ENFORCEMENT
6. DRAINS
7. WEST ELGIN PRIMARY SYSTEM
8. ADMINISTRATION
a) *WESA Annual Report
b) Building Canada Fund application Intake 2
c) JEPP funding application
d) Enabling Accessibility Fund Program application
e) Manulife renewal
f) Election - ward boundaries
g) 2009 Budget
ACCOUNTS
CORRESPONDENCE: (D1-D5)
1.* West Elgin Chamber of Commerce - proposed modification to Official Plan
2.* West Elgin Chamber of Commerce - Community Improvement Plan
3.* John Baird, MP and George Smitherman, MPP re: Building Canada Fund
4.* Joe Preston, MP re: Building Canada Fund
5. Jim Bundschuh, County Treasurer re: Police Services Board Budget
BY-LAWS:
By-law No. 2009-29 Agreement with MTO - transit funding
April 23, 2009 .............Page 3
OTHER BUSINESS: (E1)
Closed session, if deemed necessary
`information enclosed
CONFIRMING BY-LAW
ADJOURNMENT
NEXT MEETINGS
• April 23, 2009 Council
• April 30, 2009 Special Council Meeting re: Budget, 9:00 a.m.
• April 30, 2009 Public Meeting re: Community Improvement Plan
International Club, 7.00 p.m.
B!
MINIM
NW,
i
tt `1 S I
16 April, 2009
Community Planners Inc.
fvliddlesex Counb
y Building
399 Ridout Street North London, Ont-Wo W N 2?1
(519) S$3-1123
l:ax: (019) 438-7770
e-bail: ior~don rr cflr~zr;^r:nit~l^nref-s.e:~lr
MEMORANDUM
TO: Members of Council
Municipality of West Elgin
FROM: Ted L. Halwa
PAU ICHIALI'rY MST eLGIN
RECOWD
APR 2 0 2009
#0008
SUBJ: Proposed Severance - Robin & Maria Welts - 26685 Crinan Line - Part of Lot Z, Concession II -
south side of Crinan Line - west of Dunborough Road
1. Purpose
• to create a lot out of a 40.5 hectare (100 acre) parcel for the purpose of disposing a surplus farm dwelling;
• the lands proposed to be conveyed have a frontage of 76 metres (250 ft), a depth of 131 metres (430 ft) and an
area of 1.0 hectares (2.5 acres). The parcel is occupied by an older single unit dwelling (erected circa 1910),
barn and shed. The shed straddles the proposed side lot line and is to be re-located. No change in use is
proposed;
• the lands being retain have a frontage of 524 metres (1,719 ft) on Crinan Line, a flankage of 700 metres
(2,297 ft) on Dunborough Road and an area of 39.5 hectares (97.5 acres). The parcel has been cleared
extensively for agricultural purposes with the exception of a small woodlot in the southwest corner of the farm.
Several small oil pumping and storage units are situated in the easterly portion of the farm. No change in use is
proposed;
• the current owners of the subject lands, Robin & Maria Weits, have resided in the dwelling for approximately 10
years. They intend to convey the lands (in total) to Lorne and Ryan McLeod who are prepared to purchase the
lands on the assurance that they would be able to sever the surplus farm residence;
• neighbouring lands comprise a mix of agricultural use, primarily cash crop, interspersed with scattered
residential lots. A large woodlot extends to the south of the subject lands. No intensive livestock operations have
been identified in the vicinity of the proposed lot.
Robin & Maria Welts
26685 Crinan Line
Part of Lot Z, Concession II
Municipality of WEST ELGIN
AIR PHOTO
R ~ L E ia" Y I t- ~k1
i$ ~ ~M.+kY Sk 41.7 Y ~ i
t
r Fib- 5 ~ 'fy L l~ J ~ r~ t f
1 } - At k v! _ ~ ! i J ~ ~ 1 }s
r : Y 1 f L _ 1 I t l~1 ~~y _F F
-~Ti ~,'7 r to;76 fTl t. s std t F;~
't€Lip A LCD 2F] ~ tiTI~ <
CRII~ANLINS=
` 'As1?~`c f tr'
1 ha (2.47 ac.) (}z
39.5 ha f! lid
z~ (97,5 aC) t _ CELTIC_LINE.
lff t n,~~ ~ ; z~`
~ . ~ f 9~ r e'er 7's• ~ b~
' 1 fl Fit ~ '>..V
t - if It i i'r: , .}r.
".x ,c , r- < _ 1F>;n 4`n ~?sr .s~'w.'i1GY,t+'`~ ~ p, ~,T';
t4.-
rr yr it { ka
r oN
X04`. nn"~ 4Aiy. .~4 f i ~
' l Kt k- f r L r -O
r , Sr r a 'e
R w .
4, il
LANDS PROPOSED TO BE CONVEYED 0
SCALE 1: 7,500
Metres
LANDS PROPOSED TO BE RETAINED 0 50 100 200 300 400
L
~~a n r lln~rvl oJn l''
Robin & Maria Welts - Proposed Severance #0008
Municipality of West Elgin
April 16, 2009
page 2
2. Provincial Policy Statement {PPS} and Official Plan
• in prime agricultural areas, the creation of a lot for the purpose of disposing a residence surplus to a farming
operation is permitted by the PPS. A surplus residence is defined as an existing farm residence that is rendered
surplus a result of farm consolidation. Farm consolidation is defined by the PPS as: the acquisition of additional
farm parcels to be operated as one farm operation;
• in this instance, the dwelling on the lands being conveyed is considered surplus to the needs of the proposed
purchasers, Lorne and Ryan McLeod, whose principle residence (and home farm) is located at 14094
Dunborough Road in the Municipality of Dutton Dunwich. The McLeods own and farm approximately 243
hectares (600 acres) of land elsewhere in the Municipality of West Elgin;
the PPS requires that residential dwellings are prohibited on any vacant remnant parcel of farmland created by
the severance. Such a restriction is appropriately addressed as a condition of consent, if granted, through the
application of a 'site-specific' zoning consistent with past practice in the Municipality. The application would be
consistent with the PPS;
• the subject lands are designated 'Agricultural' in the Township of Aldborough Official Plan. The creation of
residential lots in such areas to dispose surplus farm dwellings is permitted provided:
a) the dwelling was in existence prior to adoption of the Plan;
b) it is not practical or feasible to relocate the dwelling to an existing vacant lot;
c) the dwelling is structurally sound and suitable for human occupancy,•
d) the remainder of the farm is zoned to prohibit a dwelling (Section 2.1.15).
the abovenoted criteria are satisfied or are capable of being satisfied as addressed elsewhere in this report.
There is no stipulation in the Plan or the PPS for that matter that the principle residence of the owner (or
proposed owners in this instance) be located in the Municipality of West Elgin. Mr. Lorne McLeod has advised
that the dwelling and the barn are structurally sound and require only cosmetic improvements;
• other criteria to be satisfied include compatibility with surrounding lands use, availability of water supply,
suitability of the lot for on-site sanitary waste disposal, access and compliance with the Zoning By-law. The
}ppommui~{Epij~ry~~1y}~y 1~~~~
planneva X311 iFc
Robin & Maria Welts - Proposed Severance #0008
Municipality of West Elgin
April 16, 2003
page 3
lands being conveyed have an existing entrance to Crinan Line. Access to the lands being retained is available
from Dunborough Road and Crinan Line and no additional entrances are required or proposed. With respect to
sanitary waste disposal, confirmation will be required to ensure that the existing septic tank and tile field system
is wholly contained on the proposed lot which, based on the sketch provided, appears to be the case. This
matter is appropriately addressed as a condition of consent, if granted;
conformity with the Official Plan of the Township of Aldborough appears capable of being maintained;
the size of the proposed lot, at 1.0 hectares (2.5 acres), is somewhat large for rural residential purposes
although justifiable under the circumstances. The proposed lot boundaries are determined by the location of the
dwelling and the barn, the on-site water supply and sanitary waste disposal system serving the dwelling. The
loss of agricultural land appears to have been minimized by confining the new lot boundaries to landscaped
open space not under cultivation.
3. Zoning By-law
• the subject lands are zoned Agricultural (Al). The proposed residential lot (i.e. lands being conveyed) would
require a re-zoning to Special Agricultural (A2) given its use and size. The lot would satisfy the minimum lot
area, maximum lot area and minimum lot frontage requirements (4,000 sq m, 1.0 ha and 50 m respectively) of
the A2 zone;
• the lands being retained would satisfy the minimum lot area and lot frontage requirements (19 ha and 150 m
respectively) of the Al zone. A re-zoning to 'site-specific' Agricultural (A14) would be required to prohibit a
dwelling being erected on the parcel in the future as stipulated by the PPS and the Official Plan;
4. Conclusions
the proposed severance would represent a type of lot creation which is both contemplated and permitted by the
Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) and the Township of Aldborough Official Plan. The Official Plan provides for
the creation of lots occupied by dwellings considered surplus to the farm operation and suitable for habitation.
There is no particular stipulation regarding ownership of the farm or residency of the prospective owners, only
Cormunr1w
nn,OF~_s Inc
;r
Robin & Maria Weits - Proposed Severance
Municipality of West Elgin
April 16, 2009
page 4
#0008
that the acquisition of additional farm parcels to be operated as one farm operation be taking place which is the
case in this instance.
5. Recommendation
That the proposed application for consent be supported (based on the lands being transferred in title to Lorne
and Ryan McLeod) subject to the following conditions and, upon receipt of an Application for Consent in the
name of Lorne and Ryan McLeod, the Elgin Land Division Committee advised accordingly:
i) That the requirements of the Municipality, if any, are satisfied with respect to the existing on-site sanitary
waste disposal system serving the dwelling on the lands being conveyed;
ii) That the lands being conveyed be re-zoned to Special Agricultural (A2) to permit their size and use for
residential purposes;
iii) That the lands being retained be re-zoned `site-specific' Agricultural (A1-#) to prohibit the erection of a
dwelling thereon in the future.
REASONS
i) The severance is 'consistent with' the Provincial Policy tatement;
ii) Conformity with the Official Plan of the Township of Aldborough would be maintained;
iii) The requirements of the Township of Aldborough Zoning By-law are capable of being satisfied;
iv) The matters set out in the Planning Act would be satisfied;
v) A legitimate surplus dwelling scenario would appear to exist.
_r- Ted L. Halwa, MCIP, RPP
MUNICIPALITY OF WEST ELGIN
APPLICATION FOR PROPOSED SEVERANCES
PLEASE COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING:
I PROPERTY OWNER(
evi
c
NAME: iMc~v~tt ~w VIr2
min~v~
ADDRESS: 26GQ,S"' G" (401L'
PHONE: ' Lq r 76 Z 2. LOT S CONCESSION Z ACREACE OF TOTAL PARCEL:
3. PARCEL TO BE SEVERED:
ACREAGE ;2 • 41 Ac. FRONTAGE 2504 DEPTH L+3®0
4. ACREAGE TO BE RETAINED: g i ,s 3 Az-,
5. REASONS FOR SEVERING AN AGRICULTURAL PARCEL - SURPLUS DWELLING ONLY
IS THE DWELLING SURPLUS TO THE NEEDS OF THE FARM? YES s! NO
WHEN WAS DWELLING CONSTRUCTED? el 10 (YEAR)
IS THE DWELLING STRUCTURALLY SOUND & SUITABLE OR POTENTIALLY SUITABLE, FOR
HUMAN OCCUPANCY? YES 4-of NO
WHERE IS YOUR PRINCIPLE RESIDENCE? 4ao9+-t- Tc MUNICIPALITY ►~w6. REASONS FOR SEVERING A PARCEL FOR OTHER THAN FOR SURPLUS DWELLINGS?
7. OTHER COMMENTS:
DATE- o SIGNATURE
NOTE: There is no charge for the first time Council reviews a proposed severance application. The fee for
additional reviews and re-submissions by Council is $100.00 per instance. If you wish to attend the
council meeting, please contact the Clerk. Proposed severance applications are reviewed by Council
at their meeting held on the 4th Thursday of each month. Please submit this application by the 3`d
Wednesday of the month for inclusion in the agenda.
FROM :DC JACKSON REALTY FAX NO. :519-633-2132 Apr. 09 2009 09:05AM P2
04108/2009 16:30 5196525360 C, H. EXCA.IATIIG PAGE 01
~RG44 :AC JFc[SCSOFE Fl4.Tf FFi7C iVa. :~~9^6 i^?132 Rpi•. 09 2009 01:00 PI
CONS. 'S' AGREEMENT
Robin and Wes Wain
2668 Celli n Line
R.R, #1 Wort Lame
Con 2, ED N Part Lot 2
100 Aare Farm
'Ibis low xms we bttve oivm W. Lomc McLeod our conmt to do any
predimlrAry worla,or m" empWcs, at his c gxwe, re g a lure sweranu of our
proputy at 26683 Crwa Lima, Wesi: Eigia T\%p"q c1uwy d M&
we 4100 givv Mr. Mclwd ft riOd to am= the v=ds for the putposc of pnefthm q
surveyin fba a aeveram mawdon.
Robin w 'ts r r
. ~ a
X29 Smoot Drive. 3t. thotll~s, Onto NSf~ 3C2 (619) 939.2131 Fax (SM 06-2132
J~m
''07 7-
/ ...,~...~..s
f ,
g ~ f
/
f" ,i ~ ~ +slL_!
s
Jot'
Vol
~o
TF-
47
t-D
Ag?
613
CLASS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT STUDY
for
IMPROVEMENTS
to the
PORT GLASGOW MARINA
WORK PLAN
Municipality of West Elgin
April 201h, 2009
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0
OVERVIEW
.......,..................,.......2
1.1
Introduction
..................................2
3
1.2
Study Area
ti
..................................3
1.3
ves
Study Objec
2.0
PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND CONSULTATION
..................................4
2.1
Project Team
..................................4
5
2
2
Government Agencies Consultation
.
2
3
Stakeholder Consultation
5
.
2.4
Public Consultation
..................................5
3.0
STUDY TASKS
..................................6
3.1
2
3
Outline
Alternative Solutions (Class EA: Phase 2)
..................................6
..................................7
.
3
3
Selection of Preferred Alternative Solution (Class EA: Phase 2)
..................................7
.
4
3
Alternative Design Concepts for the Preferred Solution (Class EA: Phase 3) • • • •
.
.
3.5
Class EA Study Documentation (Class EA: Phase 4)
.
1 D
4.0
Study Products
................................10
4.1
Study Fees and Study Schedule
................................11
Attachments
Resumes - Study Team
Timetable and Budget
Work Plan
Class EA Study - Port Glasgow Marina page 1
Municipality of West Elgin
Work Plan for Class Environmental Assessment (EA) Study
Port Glasgow Marina
1.0 OVERVIEW
1.1 Introduction
The Municipality of West Elgin, situated in the westernmost end of the County of Elgin, is
undertaking a Class Environmental Assessment Study (Class EA) to address navigational
safety issues related to the marina at Port Glasgow on Lake Erie. The marina is operated by the
Port Glasgow Yacht Club, a not-for-profit organization comprised primarily of local boaters. The
lands occupied by the marina are owned in part by the Municipality and in part by the Port
Glasgow Yacht Club (Figure 1). An agreement exists between the two parties over shared use,
operations and improvements.
The EA study would build upon the findings and recommendations of the following studies
prepared by Shoreplan Engineering Limited and authorized by the Municipality:
a) Port Glasgow Marina & Yacht Club, Entrance Feasibility Study, 2006
b) Port Glasgow Marina Entrance Modifications Design Brief, 2008
c) Sediment Transport Impact Assessment for Proposed Harbor Entrance
lmprovements, Port Glasgow Marina, 2008.
The recommended marina improvements consist of "new shore line works such as off-shore
breakwaters, shore-connected breakwaters, groynes and seawalls" identified in the Municipal
Engineers Association, Municipal Class Environmental Assessment October 2000 as amended
in 2007 document as matters subject to the preparation of a Class EA. The Shoreplan studies
anticipate that the entrance modifications to the Port Glasgow Marina for the purposes of
improving navigational safety could include the following works:
a) dredging of the boating channel,
b) acquisition of water lots from the Ministry of Natural Resources,
c) realignment of the east pier,
d) extension of the west pier and
e) construction of breakwaters.
Work Plan
Class EA Study - Port Glasgow Marina page 2
Based on an nature of the improvements that would be required to improve navigational safety,
the Municipality of West Elgin, acting as proponent, proposes to undertake the preparation of a
Class EA Study in accordance with the aforementioned Municipal Engineers Association,
Municipal Class Environmental Assessment guidelines. The Class EA Study will be carried out
as a Schedule C project, in accordance with Phase 1 through Phase 4 of the Class EA planning
process. Consultation with Oceans and Fisheries Canada will be undertaken to determine any
additional screening requirement under the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act. In
addition, confirmation will be sought from the Ministry of Natural Resources that the undertaking
qualifies as a Category "B" Project and that the work plan addresses the Ministry's requirements
under its Class EA process.
A study process has been established to conform to a level considered appropriate given the
nature of the works being considered. The Municipality reserves the right to modify the process
to accommodate additional information received or new issues or solutions that may arise
during the course of the study.
1.2 Study Area
The primary study area will consist of the area including and surrounding the Port Glasgow
Marina & Yacht Club situated in Lot 6, Con XIV in the former Township of Aldborough now in
the Municipality of West Elgin.
Upon the identification of alternative solutions (Phase 2) and alternative design concepts (Phase
3) to modify the channel to improve navigational safety, the study area may be expanded to
identify and assess the anticipated environmental impacts associated with the alternatives.
1.3 Study Objectives
The purpose of the study is to identify alternatives and a preferred design solution to address
current issues at Port Glasgow Marina related to navigational safety in a comprehensive,
environmentally sound manner in accordance with accepted marine engineering principles
which responds to the interests of potentially affected property owners, residents, government
agencies, other stakeholders and the general public. The following objectives have been
identified:
1. To protect the environment, as defined in the Environmental Assessment At
through the wise management of resources and effective monitoring and mitigation
measures;
2. To identify a solution which will significantly improve navigational safety with minimal
disruption to affected property owners and neighbouring residents and to the natural
environment;
3. To provide opportunities for the participation of a broad range of stakeholders to
allow for the sharing of ideas, education and evaluation of alternatives;
4. To document the study process and findings in compliance with all phases of the
Class Environmental Assessment process.
Work Plan
Class EA Study - Port Glasgow Marina page 3
The Entrance Feasibility Study prepared by Shoreplan confirmed the need for, and the
feasibility of, navigational safety improvements to the Port Glasgow Marina. The study
examined three design solutions for improving boater safety. The Class EA Study will identify
and examine broader based alternatives prior to evaluating the alternative design solutions
already developed, identify additional alternatives if appropriate and provide an
examination/evaluation of each alternative. A reasonable range of alternatives will be carried
forward for consideration as required to comply with the Class EA process.
In consultation with the Ministry of Natural Resources and the Lower Thames Valley
Conservation Authority (LTVCA) as well as other federal and provincial agencies, a number of
issues have been identified to be examined during the study. These issues include, but are not
limited to:
a) environmental considerations,
b) social and economic considerations,
c) viability/effectiveness of alternatives,
d) navigational safety,
e) maintenance requirements and
f) phasing of construction.
The aim of the Class EA process will be to identify the `preferred' solution being the alternative
which best addresses the 'problem' statement.
2.0 PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND CONSULTATION
2.1 Project Team
The study will be undertaken by Community Planners Inc. in association with Shoreplan
Engineering Limited, Tarandus Associates Limited and Amos Environment + Planning on behalf
of the Municipality of West Elgin. Community Planners Inc. will act as Project Manager.
Providing input to the Project Team will be the Municipality, the Port Glasgow Yacht Club,
government agencies, stakeholders and the general public.
Key members of the Project Team will be:
■ Mr. Ted Halwa, MCIP, RPP, Project Manager,
Community Planners Inc.
■ Mr. Milo Sturm, P. Eng., Coastal Engineer
Shoreplan Engineering Limited
■ Mr. Don Speller, Biologist
Tarandus Associates Limited
Work Plan
Class EA Study - Port Glasgow Marina page 4
■ Ms. Janet Amos, MCIP, RPP, Class EA Consultant
Amos Environment + Planning
The Project Team will be expanded to include persons with various areas of technical expertise
on an as-needed basis. The Project Manager will be the primary contact and liaison with the
Municipality, the Port Glasgow Yacht Club and the general public.
2.2 Government Agencies Consultation
Government agencies to be consulted through the EA process will include but not necessarily
limited to:
a) Fisheries and Oceans Canada,
b) Transport Canada (including the Coast Guard),
c) Ministry of Natural Resources,
d) Ministry of Environment,
e) Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing,
f) County of Elgin,
g) tower Thames Valley Conservation Authority.
The Project Team, under the direction and co-ordination of the Project Manager, will maintain
contact with key government agencies at an appropriate level to ensure their interests are
considered and taken into account. Early consultation with key government agencies; namely,
the Ministry of Natural Resources, the Lower Thames Valley Conservation Authority and
Fisheries and Oceans Canada is considered critical to the successful completion of the study.
2.3 Stakeholder Consultation
Other stakeholders that will be consulted through the EA process will include:
a) Port Glasgow Yacht Club,
b) First Nations and
c) residents, businesses and property owners which are potentially affected.
2.4 Public Consultation
Public consultation is also essential to the success of this study and is ensured through the
provisions of the Environmental Assessment Act. Encouraging public input through a process
that provides opportunities for learning, sharing and responses will be paramount.
The general public will have the opportunity to learn about and provide input at a minimum of
four points in the process, namely:
Work Plan
Class EA Study - Port Glasgow Marina page 5
h) 'Notice of Study Commencement' - to notify the public of the study/problem
statement (Phase 1);
i) Public Meeting - to review broad alternative solutions, their evaluation and the
recommended or 'preferred' alternative (Phase 2);
j) Public Meeting to review the alternative design concepts, their evaluation and the
recommended or 'preferred' design alternative (Phase 3);
k) 'Notice of Study Completion' - to notify the public of the completion of the draft
Environmental Study Report (Phase 4) and to provide an opportunity for public
review and comments thereon and to elicit any requests for Part 11 Orders (or'bump-
up') for the project.
A minimum of two instances must be provided for public consultation during the EA process.
These occasions will take the form of public meetings in combination with an open house,
presentation and opportunities for questions and submissions. Members of the Project Team
will attend and participate in the public meetings where their attendance is appropriate.
3.0 STUDY TASKS
3.1 Outline
The tasks associated with the Class EA study are listed below. They have been grouped into
main headings each representing areas of similar types of activities/analyses or decision points
in the process. The study tasks/process has been structured to ensure compliance with the
environmental assessment process for Class EAs.
1) Prepare draft 'Problem Statement', define 'Study Area' and confirm (modify as
necessary) 'Study Objectives' (Class EA: Phase 1);
m) Solicit initial comments from government agencies and key stakeholders;
n) Finalize `Problem Statement', 'Study Area' boundary and `Study Objectives';
o) Publish 'Notice of Study Commencement'.
p) Undertake background review and analysis (Class EA: Phase 2).
Obtain and review all pertinent background studies and documents, characterize existing
conditions of the study area including population, land use, marina use and demand, natural
features, physiography, shoreline characteristics, fishlaquatic habitat, proposed development
and changes in land use and proposed improvements to West Elgin/ Port Glasgow Yacht Club
facilities. The profile will rely on existing studies, development proposals and consultation with
key stakeholders. Fieldwork and research, as needed, will be undertaken to supplement and
verify the information necessary to complete the profile. The purpose of this task will be to
establish the 'base line conditions' under which the alternative solutions (Phase 2) and the
alternative design concepts (Phase 3) will be identified and evaluated. The findings would be
documented into a draft report and male available for public and government agency review.
Work Plan
Class EA Study - Port Glasgow Marina page 6
3.2 Alternative Solutions (Class EA: Phase 2)
In Phase 2, all reasonable alternatives to address the `Problem Statement' will be identified and
evaluated. The alternatives would be broadly based and would include relocating the marina to
a site that offers safer entry; modifying the existing channel to improve safer entry and
abandoning the existing marina. The 'do nothing' alternative would also be addressed to provide
a baseline comparison for alternative design solutions. Alternatives and combinations of
alternatives that meet the study objectives would be carried forward. Descriptions of each
alternative would be compiled along with maps and other supporting materials as necessary.
To assess and evaluate the viability of the alternatives, a series of criteria will be developed by
which to measure each alternative. The evaluation criteria would include, but not necessarily be
limited to, the following:
Social Environment
a)
community
b)
land use
c)
land ownership
d)
accessibility
e)
outdoor recreation
f)
public safety
g)
construction
Natural Environment
a) fisheries and wildlife
b) natural heritage
c) shoreline morphology
Technical
a) feasibility
b) approvability
Cost
a) capital
3.3 Selection of Preferred Alternative Solution (Class EA: Phase 2)
Using the evaluation criteria, the alternatives will be evaluated to identify a preliminary
'preferred' solution. A matrix evaluation method may be employed to ensure that each
alternative is assessed fairly against the same criteria.
Work Plan
Class EA Study - Port Glasgow Marina page 7
Based on the 'base line' conditions and the evaluation criteria, the potential impacts and net
effects of each alternative will be assessed. At this stage, the characteristics of each alternative
will be presented in sufficient detail so that its advantages and disadvantages are identified,
environmental impacts addressed and mitigation methods assessed. The preliminary `preferred
alternative' or combination of alternatives will be identified along with the reasons for its
selection.
All government agencies having an interest or potential interest in the project will be notified by
direct mail and a notice of public meeting published to solicit comments. Notice of the public
meeting will be published on two consecutive occasions in the West Elgin Chronicle and
elsewhere as determined by the Municipality. Comments and suggestions will be sought on the
following:
a) problem statement;
b) existing conditions/background/study area profile;
c) alternative solutions;
d) evaluation criteria;
e) evaluation of alternative solutions, and
f) preliminary 'preferred' solution.
A public meeting will be held consisting of an open house followed by a presentation of the
findings to date, the alternatives considered and the preliminary preferred alternative. Ample
opportunity will be provided for questions and submissions. A record will be prepared for
inclusion in the final study report. As a result of the submissions made or issues raised,
additional research or technical review on the study area profile or on the alternatives will be
undertaken where considered appropriate to do so.
3.4 Alternative Design Concepts for the Preferred Solution (Class EA: Phase 3)
Alternative design concepts will be identified based on accepted marine engineering principles
and using the selected evaluation criteria in order to identify a 'preferred' design concept. At this
stage and based on existing marine engineering done to date, the alternative design solutions
are `east and west pier extension', 'west pier extension' and `offshore breakwater' (Figure 2 -
Figure 5). A matrix evaluation method would be employed to ensure that each alternative is
assessed against the same criteria. The evaluation criteria will include, but not necessarily be
limited to, the following:
Social Environment
a) quality of life - safety
b) access
c) recreation
d) visual impact
Work Plan
Class EA Study - Port Glasgow Marina page 8
e) construction Impacts
Natural Environment
a) fisheries and wildlife
b) natural heritage
c) water quality
d) shoreline morphology
e) 16 Mile Creek
Technical
a) design standards
b) channel calming
c) reliability/durability
d) phasing ability
e) approvability
f) land and water lot requirements
g) mitigation measures
h) maintenance requirements
Cost
a) capital
b) operating
c) maintenance
A detailed evaluation of the potential impacts and net effects (after mitigation) of each
alternative design concept based on the evaluation criteria would be undertaken. The process
will be an iterative one allowing for the refinement of alternatives, identification of new
alternatives and combinations as they arise. At this stage, each alternative design would be
presented in sufficient detail so that mitigation methods may be assessed and environmental
impacts addressed. The preliminary 'preferred' alternative design concept will be identified
along with the reasons for its selection.
The second public meeting consisting of an open house followed by a presentation to consider
the alternative design concepts and the 'preferred' design will be convened. Opportunities will
be provided for questions and submissions. Notice of the public meeting will be published on
two consecutive occasions in the West Elgin Chronicle and elsewhere as determined by the
Municipality.
Work Plan
Class EA Study Port Glasgow Marina page 9
3.5 Class EA Study Documentation (Class EA: Phase 4)
The results of all the tasks undertaken will be compiled into the Environmental Study Report
(Class EA study document). The draft report will describe all components of the project which
are to be implemented to address the problem statement and which have satisfied the Class EA
process. It will include information on the following:
a) design parameters
b) functions and design features
c) capital cost estimates
d) construction requirements.
The Environmental Study Report (ESR) will also include the mitigation/implementation
measures for the preferred design solution outlining the steps necessary to mitigate any
adverse environmental impacts. The ESR will also confirm all permits and approvals required
for the project to proceed and a summary of the consultation with government agencies,
stakeholders and the public along with how the comments received have been addressed.
Copies of the draft report will be forwarded to government agencies for review and comment. All
comments received will be reviewed and addressed as necessary prior to the finalization of the
report. The final ESR will be presented to Council. `Notice of Study Completion' of the study will
be published in the West Elgin Chronicle for the required 30 day review period and made
available for review and comments. Any comments or submissions received resulting from the
`Notice of Study Completion' will be reviewed and comments provided to the Municipality.
4.0 STUDY PRODUCTS
The products arising out of the study will include at a minimum
a) `Problem Statement'
b) 'Notice of Study Commencement'
c) draft ESR
d) presentation maps and graphics
e) final ESR
f) 'Notice of Study Completion'
Hard copies of the draft and final ESR will be printed, as necessary, for the Municipality and
selected government agencies. Electronic versions will be distributed wherever possible to
reduce printing costs. Printed materials, including the display materials for the public meetings
will be fully reproducible and available to the Municipality of West Elgin in electronic form.
Work Plan
Class EA Study - Port Glasgow Marina page 10
4.1 Study Fees and Study Schedule
The estimated cost of the study is A detailed breakdown by task and personnel
assigned is provided in Table 1. Costs of publications of public notices and mailings, as well as
room charges for public meetings would be borne by the Municipality of West Elgin.
Due to the work already undertaken with respect to possible improvements to the marina
entrance, the Class EA should be capable of being completed in a cost efficient timely manner.
The study would take an estimated nine months (April - November 2009) to complete. The
timetable to initiate and complete the study is outlined in Table 2.
Contacts:
Ted Halwa MCIP,RPP
Principal & Senior Planner
Community Planners Inc.
Middlesex County Building
399 Ridout Street North
London, Ontario N6A 2P1
Tel: (519) 963-1028 ext. 255
Fax: (519) 438-7770
thalwa@commUnitypianners.com
M Sturm, P. Eng.
Shoreplan Engineering Limited
139 Merton Street, Suite 631
Toronto ON WS 3G7
416-487-4756 x222
mstrurm shore lan.com
Mr. Don Speller
Tarandus Associates Limited
18 Regan Ave, Unit 24
Brampton ON L7A 1 C2
905-840-6563
dspellera-tarandus.ca
Ms. Janet Amos, MCIP, RPP
Amos Environment + Planning
1236 Butter and Egg Road, RR#6
Bracebridge ON P1 L 1 X4
705-764-0580
amos@primus.ca
Work Plan
Class EA Study - Port Glasgow Marina page 11
94
20 April, 2009
MEMORANDUM
TO: Members of Council
Municipality of West Elgin
FROM: Ted Halwa
RE: New Official Plan - Proposed Modification - Seaside Development
#0018
As a result of the public meeting held on 19 March 2009 and in written submissions which followed, a
number of concerns were raised which warrant Council's attention before proceeding further with the
proposed modification. The proposed modification is designed to alleviate issues raised by the Ministry of
Municipal Affairs and Housing that the proposed Seaside development is not in conformity with the
existing Official Plan for the Township of Aldborough or the new, adopted but as yet unapproved, Official
Plan for the Municipality of West Elgin.
The concerns raised by the public may be characterized as being of twofold. Concerns were raised as to
the appropriateness of proceeding by way of amendment as opposed to modification while other concerns
were raised as to the specifics of the development, at both the macro (e.g. job hiring/creation) and at the
micro level (e.g. protection of views). On the other hand, there was also support expressed for the
modification and for Council to do what was necessary to bring the project to fruition.
At a subsequent meeting held with MMAH and representatives of Seaside Waterfronts Inc. and
representatives of the Municipality on 15 April 2009 at the Ministry's offices in London, MMAH reiterated
its position that it would not support a modification to the new Official Plan as a basis for resolving the
concerns it has raised over the issue of conformity. Mr. Bruce Curtis, on behalf of MMAH, expressed the
view that the modification was far from minor (although not a statutory criterion) and that proceeding in this
manner would be inconsistent with the long established practice of the Ministry throughout the Province.
He also pointed out that other municipalities have pursued modifications resisted by regional staff to the
deputy minister level to no avail. In one specific instance, the modification, if accepted, would have
facilitated local economic development.
While it appears the modification being proposed is destined to be refused by the Ministry in light of its
position enunciated at the meeting as well as on previous occasions, there is some value in proceeding
with a final draft, adopting it by resolution of Council and submitting it formally to the Ministry for
consideration. This approach would serve at least two purposes, one being that it would formalize the
request by the Municipality and, secondly; it should precipitate a formal response from the Ministry along
with reasons related thereto. If the proposal by Seaside ultimately ends up at the Ontario Municipal Board,
which is increasingly likely, the Municipality will be able to demonstrate that it pursued a reasonable and
New Official Plan - Proposed Modification - Seaside Development
Municipality of West Elgin
20 April, 2009
page 2
#0018
practical solution to avoid such a hearing. On the other hand, some members of the public have been
critical of the Municipality for pursuing the modification as a wasteful expense in view of the position being
taken by the Ministry. Some individuals advocate for the Ministry's position that the matter precede by way
of an amendment and not a modification.
Our reservations in proceeding by way of an amendment are firstly; that amending the official plan, being
currently the Township of Aldborough Official Plan, would be a wasteful exercise as that plan will be
repealed upon the approval of the new Official Plan for West Elgin. Secondly, an amendment would be an
acknowledgement that the development being proposed by Seaside does not conform to the Official Plan
(i.e. existing or proposed) - a position that neither the Municipality nor Seaside has been thus far prepared
to accept.
In view of the forgoing, it would be appropriate for Council to confirm its directions as to whether to
proceed with the modification or by way of amendment (or perhaps do nothing) before any further
resources are spent on the draft modification. Although the Ministry has not commented specifically on the
modification and is unlikely to do so, given its position on its appropriateness, there are some significant
changes to the modification, which, in principle, should make it more appealing to the Ministry.
ORIGINAL SIGNED BY
Ted L. Halwa, MCIP, RPP
66
rgn
I
Planners hC.
20 April, 2009
MEMORANDUM #0008
TO: Members of Council
Municipality of West Elgin
FROM: Ted L. Walwa
SUBJ: Storage/Shipping Containers
Further to Council's consideration at its meeting of 26 March 2009 of the request by Cory Williams to erect a storage
trailer on his property as an accessory building, we have undertaken a preliminary review of these types of structures
as well as refurbished shipping containers now on the market for these same purposes.
MCS Containers (a division of Marine Container Services Inc.), based in Montreal, offers for sale new and used
shipping containers as storage units (both for farm and residential purposes), on-site offices and mobile laboratories.
The shipping containers are of all-metal construction with the exception of a wood floor. MCS will customize the
containers to suit specific needs. With respect to rust prevention measures, a special hardwearing, anti-corrosive
marine paint is applied to the units.
The shipping containers range in length from 6.1 metres (20 ft) to 12.2 metres (40 ft), and custom lengths are available
as low as 3.0 metres (10 ft). The smaller units (i.e. up to 6.1 m in length) may be practical for built-up residential areas
in keeping with the size of other accessory buildings and structures, although their outward appearance is not
residential in character. Longer units would appear suitable for agricultural applications. MCS Containers markets the
units for a number of uses and does promote the use of the larger units for general storage, hay storage, as a
workshop and even as a small livestock barn.
Mobile Mini Inc., based in Arizona, offers for sale or rent storage containers units ranging in size from 2.4 m x 3.0 m (8
ft x 10 ft) to 2.4 m x 12.2 m (8ft x 40 ft). The containers are new units as opposed to re-cycled and/or refurbished
containers. All units are of steel construction with plywood floors and are finished in a light beige, rust resistant paint.
There is no special rust prevention treatment applied and maintenance against rust is the responsibility of the owner,
although premature rusting is unlikely.
111 Ili t1` raj-
Shipping Containers
Municipality of West Elgin
April 20, 2009
page 2
#0008
In both the abovenoted cases and similar to other companies dealing with these product, a range of options exists with
respect to the number and location of doors. This permits more flexible siting of the storage containers on individual
lots and, in turn, potentially easier access.
The advantages of using shipping containers for storage purposes is largely related to their construction - solid steel
walls and roof with a thick wooden floor render the units virtually indestructible. The units are described as airtight,
waterproof, rodent/pest resistant and, when locked and secured, impenetrable. They are readily portable. Examples of
typical shipping containers (both new and used) manufactured and refurbished by Storage Systems, based in Toronto,
are attached.
Under the existing zoning by-laws in effect (Aldborough, West Lorne and Rodney), the use of shipping containers is
not expressly prohibited although truck, bus, coach, railway car or streetcar bodies are. Their omission is likely the
result of the fact that they were not generally available at the time the by-laws were drafted. This being the case, a
shipping container could be argued to constitute an accessory building or structure under the current zoning by-laws
and permitted subject to the yard and setback standards applying to accessory buildings or structures.
To preclude this from occurring if such was the wish of Council, an interim control by-law could be adopted. The by-
law would have the effect of prohibiting the erection of storage containers on lands prescribed in the by-law until a
review is undertaken (as required by the Planning Act) which addresses the issues pertaining to their use and
maintenance and their impact on neighbouring properties. The review is appropriately undertaken as part of the
preparation of the new comprehensive zoning by-law now in preparation for the Municipality of West Elgin. The
appropriate control measures could be readily incorporated in the new zoning by-law.
The Planning Act permits a municipality to establish the period during which the interim control by-law would be in
effect to a maximum of one year from the date of adoption unless the by-law is repealed sooner. At its discretion,
Council may extend the period for which the by-law applies for an additional one year period should this prove
necessary. There is no statutory notice or public meeting requirements to be fulfilled prior to Council adopting an
interim control by-law. Notice of the passing of such a by-law must, however, be given within 30 days of its adoption.
Any person or public body may appeal the by-law within 60 days of its adoption. Appeals are heard by the Ontario
Municipal Board.
_
I .an r 17
07A
#0008
Shipping Containers
Municipality of West Elgin
Apr1120, 2009
page 3
Alternatively, the three zoning by-laws still in effect in West Elgin (of the former municipalities Rodney, West Lorne and
Aldborough) could be amended to specifically address these types of structures. Notice would be required and a public
meeting convened. Finally, Council could elect to do nothing at this point in time, leaving the issues to be addressed in
the new comprehensive zoning by-law now in preparation for West Elgin.
Ted L. Halwa, MCIP, RPP
USED STORAGE/SHIPPING CONTAINERS
NEW STORAGE/SHIPPING CONTAINERS
i41
Y l ;
gy.~. c
? 2A NEW. CUSTOM CONTAINER
CB a)
PRELIMINARY DRAFT
For Discussion Purposes Only
2008 ANNUAL SITE MONITORING AND OPERATIONS REPORT
WEST ELGIN LANDFILL SITE
MUNICIPALITY OF WEST ELGIN
RODNEY, ONTARIO
PREPARED FOR:
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF WEST ELGIN
22413 Hoskins Line, Box 490
Rodney, Ontario NOL 2CO
Municipality of Wcst Elgin
WESA
A t CHU FIlVironment l'or BLOIICSS
PRELIMINARY DRAFT
For Discussion Purposes Only
2008 ANNUAL SITE MONITORING
AND OPERATIONS REPORT
WEST ELGIN LANDFILL SITE
MUNICIPALITY OF WEST ELGIN
RODNEY, ONTARIO
Prepared for:
Mum.ci.palay of Wcst Elgin
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF WEST ELGIN
22413 Hoskins Line, Box 490
Rodney, ON NOL 2CO
Prepared by:
MESA
A Better Environment For Business
WESA Inc.
171 Victoria Street North
Kitchener, ON N21-1 5C5
April 2009
File No. W-B4718-05
Ref 84718-05 Annual repel doc
2008 Annual Site Monitoring and Operations Report Preliminary Draft
West Elgin Landfill Site For Discussion Purposes Only
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION
.......................................1
1.1 Background
........................................1
1.2 Limiting Conditions
2
1.3 Site Sensitivity and Comparison Criteria
3
2.0 2007 ENVIRONMENTAL MONTORING PROGRAM ..........................................3
2.1 Methodology
........................................3
2.1.1 Groundwater Monitoring Program
3
2.1.2 Methane Vapour Monitoring
4
2.2 Results and Discussion
5
2.2.1 Site Geology
5
2.2.2 Hydrogeology
........................................6
2.2.3 Vapour Concentrations
8
2.2.4 Groundwater Quality
8
2.2.4.1 Background Groundwater Chemistry and Reasona
ble Use Calculations......... 9
2.2.4.2 Leachate Indicator Parameters
9
2.2.4.3 Site Groundwater Quality
11
2.2.4.4 Quality Assessment and Quality Control (QA/QC)
......................................15
3.0 ANNUAL OPERATIONS REPORT
......................................15
3.1 Historical Site Operations
.......................................15
3.2 Existing Conditions
.......................................16
3.3 Waste Disposal
.......................................17
3.4 Final Contours and Site Capacity
.......................................19
3.5 2007 Site Operations
20
3.6 Changes to Operational Procedures and Infrastructure
.......................................21
4.0 RECOMMENDATIONS
......................................22
5.0 REFERENCES
......................................25
WESA
u: Page i
2008 Annual Site Monitoring and Operations Report Preliminary Draft
West Elgin Landfill Site For Discussion Purposes Only
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1: Groundwater Elevation Data
Table 2: Methane Vapour Data
Table 3: Groundwater Geochemistry Data - General and Elemental Metals Scan
Table 4: Groundwater Geochemistry Data - Volatile Organic Compound Data
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure'l:
Site Location Map
Figure 2:
Site Plan
Figure 3:
Location of Cross Sections
Figure 4:
Cross Section AW
Figure 5:
Cross Section B-B'
Figure 6:
Groundwater Elevations and Flow Directions May 2007
Figure 7:
Groundwater Elevations and Flow Directions November 2007
Figure 8:
Groundwater Chemistry May 2007
Figure 9:
Groundwater Chemistry November 2007
Figure 10:
Final Contours
Figure 11:
Revised Landfill Layout
LIST OF APPENDICES
(Not Included In Draft Report)
Appendix A: Borehole Logs
Appendix B: Laboratory Reports of Groundwater Chemical Analyses
Appendix C: Certificate of Approval
Appendix D: Landfill Inspection Forms (Spring and Fall 2008)
WESA
Page H
2008 Annual Site Monitoring and Operations Report Preliminary Draft
West Elgin Landfill Site For Discussion Purposes Only
1.0 INTRODUCTION
WESA Inc. (WESA) was retained by The Corporation of the Municipality of West Elgin
(Municipality of West Elgin) to complete the 2008 annual site monitoring and operations
for the West Elgin Landfill site (the site) located near Rodney, Ontario. The monitoring
program consisted of semi-annual (spring and fall) monitoring of the site groundwater
quality. The Municipality of West Elgin currently operates the West Elgin Landfill site
under the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) Amended Provisional Certificate of
Approval (C of A) for Waste Disposal Site No. A051101 (dated December 21, 2005). This
annual report summarizes the results of the 2008 environmental monitoring program,
site operations for 2008 as well as comments from the MOE (letter dated December 3,
2008) on the 2007 Annual Site Monitoring and Operations Report for the site. A site
location map is provided as Figure 1.
1.1 BACKGROUND
WESA was retained by the Municipality in 2006 to prepare an environmental monitoring
and design/operational plans for the West Elgin landfill (WESA, 2006a). The work
components were completed to fulfill the requirements of the Amendment to the
Provisional Certificate of Approval (C of A) provided to the Municipality by the MOE
(MOE, 2005).
In response to recommendations provided by WESA in the Hydrogeological Investigation
and Design and Operations Report (WESA, 2006a) and to the Ministry of the
Environment (MOE) in their comments on the report (MOE, 2007), WESA was retained
by the Municipality to complete a subsurface investigation and leachate delineation study
for the West Elgin Landfill (WESA, 2007).
The subsurface investigation and leachate delineation study allowed for delineation of
leachate impacts down gradient of the landfill. The study concluded that towards the
east the impacts are limited to just beyond the property boundary but are not a concern
due to aggregate operations and the wetland. To the south east and south impacts are
limited to within <20 m of the property line. Impacts towards the south east are less of a
concern due to the wetland but are a concern to the south.
`i WESA
Page
2008 Annual Site Monitoring and Operations Report Preliminary Draft
West Elgin Landfill Site For Discussion Purposes Only
The impacts to the south west are localized effect of metal storage on site and can be
mitigated over time with the implementation of proper operation procedures.
To fulfill the requirements of the Reasonable Use Guideline (RUL) (B-7) and the
contaminant attenuation zone (CAZ), the Municipality has two recommended options;
purchase surrounding property, or, 2- purchase the water rights and obtain land access
agreements for the surrounding properties. Based on the conclusions of the study a 30
meter buffer to the south east and a 50 meter buffer to the south have been proposed.
The recommended extent of the CAZ satisfies the current MOE requirements and allows
for some additional buffer room, if required. At this time no action is needed towards
the south west. The Municipality is continuing to assess the results of the investigation
and are considering their options at this time.
In addition, it was strongly encouraged that the design and operations recommendations
made by WESA as part of the Hydrogeological Investigation and Design and Operations
Report (WESA, 2006a) be implemented to minimize any additional leachate impacts and
the potential need for an extension of the CAZ in the future.
1.2 LIMITING CONDITIONS
The conclusions presented in this report represent our professional opinion, in light of the
terms of reference, scope of work and any limiting conditions noted herein. All work is
limited to the areas identified in the report. WESA cannot make any conclusions beyond
these limits.
The information and opinions expressed in this report is prepared for the sole benefit of
Municipality of West Elgin and the MOE. No other party may use or rely upon this
report or any portion thereof without the express written consent of WESA.
i i WESA
% 11,:T'. I"'..•, u:.m h., 6:nm„` Page 2
2008 Annual Site Monitoring and Operations Report Preliminary Draft
West Elgin Landfill Site For Discussion Purposes Only
1.3 SITE SENSITIVITY AND COMPARISON CRITERIA
The MOE Reasonable Use Guideline B7 (MOEE, 1994) was established by the MOE to
determine the reasonable use of groundwater on properties adjacent to sources of
contaminants (such as a waste disposal site). The guideline allows the determination of
acceptable levels of various contaminants that may potentially migrate from a waste
disposal site.
The limits are calculated considering the natural background quality of groundwater
existing and potential reasonable uses of groundwater in the area. The Reasonable Use
Limits (RUL) were calculated based on the 2007 results for the site groundwater and
Ontario Drinking Water Standard, Objectives and Guidelines (ODWS) (MOE, 2006) and
will be used to asses the landfill impacts at this site.
Analytical results are compared to RUL and/or ODWS and/or background conditions
where no RUL has been established.
2.0 2008 ENVIRONMENTAL MONTORING PROGRAM
The methods and results of the 2008 environmental monitoring program (spring and
fall) are presented below.
2.1 METHODOLOGY
2.1.1 Groundwater Monitoring Program
The groundwater monitoring programs were conducted on May 121h (spring) and
October 1611 and September 1611 (fall), 2008. Water levels were obtained from each
monitoring wells to calculate groundwater elevations and flow directions. Locations of
the monitoring wells are detailed in Figure 2. All borehole logs/ monitoring well
construction logs are provided in Appendix A.
WESA
Page 3
2008 Annual Site Monitoring and Operations Report Preliminary Draft
West Elgin Landfill Site For Discussion Purposes Only
Samples collected were analysed for a series of inorganic parameters (including metals
and chloride) and volatile organic compounds (VOCs). The list of parameters includes,
but is not limited to, the leachate indicator parameters previously established (VESA,
2006a). The list of leachate indicator parameters includes dissolved organic carbon
(DOC) as requested by the MOE in their letter dated December 3, 2008. All parameters
were analyzed to confirm the appropriate indicators.
All monitoring wells were developed prior to sampling by purging a minimum of three
well volumes or until the well was dry three times. The wells were then sampled using
dedicated Waterra inertial lift foot valves and polyethylene tubing
Clean, disposable nitrile gloves were worn when sampling. Inorganic parameter and
metal samples were collected in sealed, laboratory provided bottles. Depending on the
parameters analyzed, the appropriate preservative was placed in the bottle by the lab.
Care was taken in the field to limit cross contamination of preservative and loss of
preservative during sampling. In addition, metal samples were field filtered using a 0.45
µm filter. VOC samples were collected in three, 40ml- clear glass vials with Teflon septa.
All samples were stored at approximately 40C during shipment to the laboratory.
Chain of Custody forms accompanied the samples from the field to the laboratory and
until chemical results were presented to WESA. All groundwater samples were submitted
to ALS Laboratories (ALS) of Waterloo, Ontario. A full list of parameters analyzed is
provided in Table 3 and 4 and full analytical results are provided in Appendix A.
2.1.2 Methane Vapour Monitoring
Methane concentrations were measured in the both sampling events in 2008, at all
groundwater monitoring locations at the same time as the groundwater elevation
measurements using a portable Eagle@ combustible gas monitor calibrated for methane
with a Multi-gas methane sensor. Methane readings in parts per million methane, % LEL
of Lower Explosive Limit) and % methane were measured within the riser pipe at
each location.
WESA
Ek I rn rr<.rrnrm I
Page 4
2008 Annual Site Monitoring and Operations Report Preliminary Draft
West Elgin Landfill Site For Discussion Purposes Only
2.2 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The results of the 2008 monitoring program are presented below. The 2008 results are
compared with historical data, established targets or Provincial guidelines where
appropriate.
2.2.1 Site Geology
The surficial geology in the area of the site is classified into three units. The upper unit is a
lacustrine deep water deposit consisting of sand, silt and clay till. These are underlain by
lacustrine shallow water deposits consisting of gravel and sand. The gravel and sand unit
in the area overlies a well laminated to massive clayey silt till. Drift thickness of the gravel
and sand units are upwards of 10 m in the area (P.Map, 1973).
Observations during the test drilling program (excluding the boreholes completed in the
landfill material) (WESA, 2006a) identified an overlying till unit present across the area.
A gravel/sand, gravel or sand unit that was up to 2.5 m thick was beneath the till and
overlying a clay unit. In places throughout the landfill, some or all the units overlying the
clay had been removed and replaced with landfill material. Borehoies were not
advanced more than 2 m into the clay and therefore the full depth of the clay is not
known. Based on MOE wells records for the area the clay extends to the top of bedrock
that is approximately 90 m below ground surface (bgs). The distribution of units can be
seen in two cross sections that were constructed north- south and east - west across the
site. The location of the cross sections is outlined in Figure 3 the cross sections are
included as Figures 4 and 5. The additional off site investigation confirms the geology in
the area (WESA, 2007).
The bedrock geology in the subject area is described as an inter-bedded limestone and
shale with fossilliferous zones. Bedrock in the area is part of the Dundee formation and is
Middle Devonian in age (P.2544).
WESA
%IL,u, Imiu run:vf b" Page 5
2008 Annual Site Monitoring and Operations Report Preliminary Draft
West Elgin Landfill Site For Discussion Purposes Only
2.2.2 Hydrogeology
Historical hydrogeological information for the area suggests that the direction of regional
groundwater flow is generally from the northwest to the southeast towards Lake Erie
(Chapman, 1984).
Shallow groundwater flow on site has been characterized by wells completed within the
landfill material or the native sand and gravel units (with the exception of MW2D).
Monitoring well MW2D is completed within the clay layer that underlies the landfill and
is therefore not part of the shallow groundwater flow.
Based on the historical site operations as a former sand and gravel pit, it was determined
during the initial hydrogeological investigation on site where areas of native sand and
gravel remained. These areas were identified along the property boundaries as
preferential pathway for leachate migration (WESA, 2006). The areas were confirmed in
2007 to continue off site MESA, 2007).
The results of the initial hydrogeological investigation (WESA, 2006a) concluded that the
hydraulic conductivity of the sand and gravel unit (1.0 x 10-3 m/s) is two orders of
magnitude higher than that of the landfill material (1.5 x 10.5 m/s) tested and therefore
could act as a preferential pathway for leachate impacted groundwater to migrate off
site. The clay that is present around the area has a measured hydraulic conductivity (1.0 x
10-8 m/s) that is two to three orders of magnitude less than the overlaying units and
therefore will help to restrict water and leachate movement.
S rin 2008
Static groundwater elevation data collected on May 12th, 2008 for the monitoring well
network is summarized in Table 1.
The groundwater within the shallow flow ranges between 95.26 and 96.5 meters below
ground surface (m bgs). Groundwater flow on site is generally towards the east. There is
a mound (an area where water levels are elevated above the immediate surrounding
area) in the groundwater table located along the western property boundary between
MW5 and MWl.
WESA
1: 1 - Page 6
2008 Annual Site Monitoring and Operations Report Preliminary Draft
West Elgin Landfill Site For Discussion Purposes Only
The mound causes a component of the groundwater flow in the south western corner of
the site to flow towards the south (away from MW5 towards MW10). Due to the
mounding effects there is the potential for a small component of flow to be directed
towards MWI (the background well). In the spring 2008 the horizontal gradient
between MW5 and MWI was negligible and therefore there is no component of
groundwater flow from MW5 towards MWI due to the mounding. In addition, no
leachate indicator parameters above the RUL were noted in MWI during the spring. The
groundwater quality of MWI will continue to be monitored for any leachate impacts. If
impacts are noted additional wells maybe required and the background groundwater
quality monitoring location reassessed.
Flow along the south western property boundary (MW5) is towards the landfill. A
groundwater elevation map indicating the groundwater flow patterns on site is shown in
Figure 6.
Vertical flow between the landfill material, measured in MW2 and clay unit, measured in
MW2D was downward at a gradient of 0.15.
Fall 2008
Static groundwater elevation data collected on September 161h, 2008 is summarized in
Table 1.
The groundwater within the shallow flow ranges between 94.97 and 95.86 meters
below ground surface (m bgs) in September 2008. A groundwater elevation map
indicating the groundwater flow patterns on site is shown in Figure 7. Groundwater flow
on site is generally towards the east. Similarly to the spring event, there is a mound (an
area where water levels are elevated above the immediate surrounding area) in the
groundwater table located along the western property boundary between MW5 and
MWL The mound causes a component of the groundwater flow in the south western
corner of the site to flow towards the south (away from MW5 towards MW10). The
high in the groundwater flow is located in MW5, completed in the native material in the
southern portion of the site and the low is in MWII located just off site to the north east.
A horizontal gradient is present across the landfill towards the south east. These results
are consistent with historical observations (WESA, 2006b).
WESA
~
Page 7
2008 Annual Site Monitoring and Operations Report Preliminary Draft
West Elgin Landfill Site For Discussion Purposes Only
The horizontal gradients between MWI and MW5 due to the mounding effects in the
vicinity of MW5 were negligible and consistent with the conditions observed in the
spring of 2008. No leachate indicator parameters exceeded the RUL in MWI. MWI will
continue to be used to assess background groundwater quality on site. The use of MWI
may be re assessed if leachate impacts are observed at this location.
Vertical flow between the landfill material, measured in MW2 and clay unit, measured in
MW2D is downward at a gradient of 0.32, slightly higher than historical calculations.
2.2,3 Vapour Concentrations
Methane vapour survey results from each monitoring location are presented in Table 2.
Methane concentrations were measured at X100 % LEL in MW5, 850 ppm in MW2 and
7 % LEL in MW2D during the spring sampling event. The concentrations in the
remainder of the wells were below 50 ppm.
Methane concentrations were measured at X100 % LEL in MW5 with a 4% by volume
methane concentration, 30 ppm in MW2 and 4 % LEL in MW2D during the fall
sampling event. The concentrations in the remainder of the wells were below 25 ppm.
The high methane readings were noted in wells located within or below landfill material
(MW2 and MW2D) or in close proximity to historical and/or current land filling
operations (MW5).
2.2.4 Groundwater Quality
The results of the groundwater quality analyses are presented and discussed below.
Results are discussed based on background groundwater chemistry, leachate
characterization and groundwater quality. The groundwater chemistry is summarized in
Tables 3 and 4 and in Figures 8 and 9 of this report.
Analytical results are compared to RUL and/or ODWS and/or background conditions
where no RUL has been established. Complete analytical results are presented in the
original laboratory certificates of analyses provided in Appendix B.
WESA
uk::n Imun:aurm?-I i%t..u:.- Page 8
2008 Annual Site Monitoring and Operations Report Preliminary Draft
West Elgin Landfill Site For Discussion Purposes Only
2.2.4.1 Background Groundwater Chemistry and Reasonable Use Calculations
Based on the results of the on site hydrogeological investigations, it was shown that the
quality of groundwater from the groundwater monitoring well MW1 is representative of
background chemistry. The well is located approximately 20 m up gradient in the north
western corner of the site (Figure 2).
The groundwater quality at the site was compared to calculated RUL based on the
background conditions on site, as measured in MWl and the ODWS. Calculated RUL
values and ODWS are listed in Table 3.
The concentrations of parameters that exceed the RUL and/or background are
highlighted in Table 3. VOC concentrations were compared to the ODWS and
exceedences are highlighted in Table 4.
Background well MWl is well removed from the affects of the landfill yet has shown
exceedences of RUL for several parameters including hardness, TDS (total dissolved
solids), iron and manganese. These parameters often exceed ODWS in groundwater
supplies in south-western Ontario and may be attributed to natural variations in
groundwater quality. Therefore these parameters may not be suitable leachate indicator
parameters for this site but will be considered in conjunction with other leachate
indicator parameters in the assessment of leachate impact.
The parameter concentrations at MWl will continue to be monitored closely in
subsequent monitoring programs to verify that it is still representative of background
conditions.
2.2.4.2 Leachate Indicator Parameters
Upon review of the historical groundwater quality at the background location (MW1)
and that of the landfill (MW2), leachate on site has been characterized by high
concentrations of:
• Ammonia, alkalinity, arsenic, chloride, DOC (dissolved organic carbon), iron
and sodium
WE SA
IIl'l1 ~r, l111~ lr1151, n...
Page 9
2008 Annual Site Monitoring and Operations Report Preliminary Draft
West Elgin Landfill Site For Discussion Purposes Only
The seven parameters as outlined above, have historically defined the leachate indicator
parameters for the site (WESA, 2006a and b). In 2007, the additional investigations and
the historical analytical results were reviewed and the list of leachate indicator
parameters re-assessed. The off site groundwater quality, the natural features located off
site (wetlands) and the surrounding properties' current and historical operations were
used in this review. Based on this information DOC and iron are not believed to be
solely representative of leachate impacts originating from the landfill and therefore were
removed from the definitive leachate indicator parameters and were not used to
delineate leachate impacts off site. However, as requested by the MOE in their letter
dated December 2008, DOC has been added to the leachate impact parameter list in the
2008 analysis.
The landfill is positioned within a series of wetlands (northwest property boundary) and
provincially significant wetlands (east property boundary). As a result of the wetlands in
close proximity to the landfill and the groundwater monitoring wells, the DOC reported
in the wells could be attributed to secondary sources and not just from leachate. In
addition, deforestation activates have occurred on the property adjacent to the south
western property boundary (MW9). Deforestation could also attribute elevated DOC
within the groundwater (MW9). Further evaluation of DOC concentrations are required
to determine if DOC is in fact indicative of leachate impacts at this landfill.
Iron concentrations are variable across the site. Higher concentrations have been noted in
down gradient wells (MW3, M\V, 10 and MW11) than in wells completed with in the
landfill material (MW2) and wells with known leachate impacts (MW6 and MW7).
Given this trend iron concentrations can not be fully attributed to landfill activities but
maybe signs of localized impacts due to metal storage on site. On its own iron is not
representative of leachate impacts but in conjunction with other parameters, such as
chloride it can be an indicator for leachate impacts.
Organic Nitrogen concentrations are often used to assess the impacts of leachate and are
often preferred over just using ammonia concentrations for groundwater. The
concentration of Organic Nitrogen is based on a calculation using the concentrations of
ammonia and TKN reported in a sample. Organic Nitrogen will be used in conjunction
with ammonia to assess leachate impacts.
~6 WESA
M, t.,„„..,,,,,.,„ Page 10
2008 Annual Site Monitoring and Operations Report Preliminary Draft
West Elgin Landfill Site _ For Discussion Purposes Only
Based on the information presented above, a revised list of leachate indicator parameters
has been prepared. The revised parameter list is believed to be representative of leachate
impacts associated with the site are to be used to delineate the leachate impacts on and
off site.
• Ammonia, alkalinity, arsenic, chloride, DOC, iron, organic N, and sodium
The leachate indicator parameters are used to assess the quality of groundwater and will
be used to monitor changes in groundwater chemistry at each sampling location. It
should be noted that although certain parameters (i.e. iron) are leachate indicator
parameters for the site, they often occur naturally (i.e. at non-impacted wells) at
concentrations above RUL and/or ODWS. Therefore, concentrations of leachate indicator
parameters are compared to background concentrations to assess leachate impact.
Upon comparison of the groundwater chemistry at one or more monitoring locations on
site to calculated RULs, ODWS and background conditions several parameters exceed the
set value. Although exceedences were noted, the parameters are not considered leachate
indicator parameters for this site. The parameters include colour, hardness, TDS, fluoride,
sulphate, boron, and manganese. As discussed in the 2007 Annual Report (WESA, 2007),
the natural occurrence of these parameters and the concentrations of these parameters in
the background well indicate that these parameters are not indicative of leachate impact.
It is recognized that chloride represents the most mobile of the contaminant indicator
parameters encountered and would be expected to be the first contaminant indicator
parameter to reach a monitoring location if leachate migration was occurring.
Concentrations of chloride will be monitored closely to evaluate the migration of
leachate impacts off site.
2.2.4.3 Site Groundwater Quality
Spring 2008
The groundwater quality within the shallow flow and the clay unit are presented in
Table 3 with RUL and the background groundwater quality established for the site. The
parameters that exceeded the RUL and/or background have been highlighted.
~-i WESA
t fG^,~rr t nnioanir11 1-4 Ikianr..
Page 11
2008 Annual Site Monitoring and Operations Report Preliminary Draft
West Elgin Landfill Site For Discussion Purposes Only
Table 4 presents the VOC data and the VOC parameter levels that exceeded ODWS have
been highlighted. Groundwater chemistry results showing leachate indicator parameters
that exceed the RUL can also be seen in Figures 8.
The following table summarizes all parameters measured in excess of the RUL and the
location of the monitoring well for the May 2008 sampling event:
Summaryof RUL Exceedances
Well Location
Monitoring
Well
Groundwater
Flow
Leachate Parameters RUL
Exceedences
Background
MW1
Shallow
-
Leachate
MW2
Shallow
Chloride, Alkalinity, Iron, and
DOC
East
MW3
Shallow
Alkalinity, Arsenic, Iron, and
DOC
Southeast
MW4
Shallow
Alkalinity and DOC
Southwest
MW5
Shallow
Alkalinity, Iron, and DOC
Off Site
M\V, 6
Shallow
Chloride, Alkalinity, Iron, and
DOC
East
MW7
Shallow
Chloride, Alkalinity, and DOC
Off Site
MW8
Shallow
Alkalinity and DOC
Off Site
MW9
Shallow
-
Off Site
MW10
Shallow
-
Off Site
MWI1
Shallow
Chloride, Alkalinity, Sodium,
and DOC
Off Site
MW12
Shallow
-
Clay
MW2D
Deep
DOC
The concentration of ammonia was compared to background levels measured in MW1.
The results were above the background levels in 12 of the 13 wells (not in MW10).
Organic nitrogen was compared to both background levels measured in MW1 and the
RUL. There were no instances of organic nitrogen exceeding the RUL, however it did
exceed the background level in M1VJ1 in 10 of the 13 wells (not in MWl, MW4, and
M\V11
WESA
Page 12
2008 Annual Site Monitoring and Operations Report Preliminary Draft
West Elgin Landfill Site For Discussion Purposes Only
Monitoring well MW2D, located within the landfill footprint, was completed within the
clay to see the effects of the landfill activates of the clay layer. The RUL was not
exceeded for any leachate indicator parameters in spring 2008 except for DOC. The
ammonia and organic nitrogen concentrations were reported above background
concentrations.
The analytical results observed during the monitoring event are consistent with those
historically observed and reported on site.
The results of the VOC analyses are summarized in Table 4. The results of the VOC
analyses had concentrations of all parameters measured below the ODWS in spring
2008.
A few parameters were detected above the laboratory detection limit and followed
historical trends. Benzene has been noted in MW4 and MW5 since May 2006 and was
detected again in MW4 in spring 2008. Benzene was also detected in MW3 in spring
2008 for the first time. Chlorobenzene, ethylbenzene and total xylene has also been
reported in MW5 over the same time period. Toluene and total xylene were detected in
MW2 in spring 2008. Concentrations of dichlorodifuoromethane (May 2006), methyl
ethyl ketone (November 2006), xylenes (November 2006 and May 2007) and
trichlorofluoromethane (May 2006 to May 2007) have also been reported above the
laboratory detection limits. Acetone, carbon disulfide, DCE, Trans 1,2-Dichloropropene
and trichorofluoromethane were detected in spring 2008. Chlorobenzene and the
fluoromethanes are associated with refrigerants. These parameters will continue to be
monitored to assess their impacts on the site.
Fall 2008
The parameters that exceeded the RUL and/or background have been highlighted in
Table 3. VOC concentrations were compared to the ODWS and exceedances highlighted
in Table 4. Groundwater chemistry results that exceed the RUL for leachate indicator
parameters can also be seen in Figures 9.
The following table summarizes all parameters measured in excess of the RUL and the
location of the monitoring well for the September 2008 sampling event:
WESA
Page 13
2008 Annual Site Monitoring and Operations Report Preliminary Draft
West Elgin Landfill Site For Discussion Purposes Only
Summary of RUL Exceedances
Well
Location
Monitoring Well
Groundwater
Flow
Leachate Parameters RUL
Exceedences
Background
MWI
Shallow
-
Leachate
MW2
Shallow
Alkalinity, Arsenic, Iron, and DOC
East
MW3
Shallow
Alkalinity, Arsenic, Iron, and DOC
Southeast
MW4
Shallow
Alkalinity, Iron, and DOC
Southwest
MW5
Shallow
Alkalinity, Iron, and DOC
Off Site
MW6
Shallow
Chloride, Alkalinity, Iron, and
DOC
East
MW7
Shallow
Chloride, Alkalinity, and DOC
Off Site
MW8
Shallow
Alkalinity and DOC
Off Site
MW9
Shallow
-
Off Site
MWI0
Shallow
Iron
Off Site
M\V1 1I
Shallow
Chloride, Alkalinity, Sodium, and
DOC
Off Site
MW12
Shallow
-
Clay
MW2D
Deep
Iron and DOC
The concentration of ammonia was compared to background levels measured in MW1.
The results were above the background levels in 10 of the 13 wells (not in MWI, MW10,
or MW12). Organic nitrogen was compared to both the background levels measured in
MWI and the RUL.
There were no instances of Organic Nitrogen exceeding the RUL, however it did exceed
the background level in MWI in 8 of the 13 wells (not in MWI, MW4, MW8, MW9, and
MW10).
Monitoring well MW2D, located within the landfill footprint, was completed within the
clay to see the effects of the landfill activates of the clay layer. The RUL was exceeded for
leachate indicator parameters iron and DOC in fall 2008. The ammonia and organic
nitrogen concentrations were reported above background concentrations.
L
6 . WESA
Page 14
2008 Annual Site Monitoring and Operations Report Preliminary Draft
West Elgin Landfill Site For Discussion Purposes Only
The analytical results observed during the monitoring event are consistent with those
historically observed and reported on site.
The results of the VOC analyses are summarized in Table 4. The results of the VOC
analyses had concentrations of all parameters measured below the ODWS in fall 2008.
A few parameters were detected above the laboratory detection limit but below the
ODWS and followed historical trends. Benzene is noted in MW3, MW4 and MW5 in fall
2008. Benzene had been noted in MW4 and MW5 since May 2006 and in MW3 in
spring 2008. Total Xylene was noted for the first time in MW4 in fall 2008 and
chlorobenzene was noted in MW5 as was noted historically. Acetone and chloroform
were detected in fall 2008 in MW2D. These parameters will continue to be monitored to
assess their impacts on the site.
2.2.4.4 Quality Assessment and Quality Control (QA/QC)
A duplicate sample was collected from MW5 while on site for QA/QC purposes in both
the spring and the fall. An additional trip bank sample was collected in the fall. The
analytical results indicated good correlation between samples (Table 3 and 4).
3.0 ANNUAL OPERATIONS REPORT
3.1 HISTORICAL SITE OPERATIONS
The West Elgin Landfill site has been in operation since 1971. A Provisional Certificate of
Approval (A051101) was first issued in 1971 and reissued in 1972, 1973, 1974, and 1976.
On July 16, 1980 the MOE reissued a Provisional Certificate of Approval (C of A) to the
Village of Rodney.
The MOE issued an amendment to the C of A on December 21, 2005 (Appendix E). A
Hydrogeologicai Investigation and Design and Operations Report was completed by
WESA and submitted to the Director of the MOE for approval on September 151, 2006
(WESA, 2006).
WESA
Page 15
2008 Annual Site Monitoring and Operations Report Preliminary Draft
West Elgin Landfill Site For Discussion Purposes Only
3.2 EXISTING CONDITIONS
The West Elgin Landfill site is owned by the Municipality of West Elgin, and operated
and maintained under contract from the municipality by a company operated by Mr.
Sam Kirschner. The site is located on Lot B, Concession 7 former Township of
Aldborough, West Elgin Municipality, County of Elgin (Figure 1).
The landfill services the entire Municipality of West Elgin. The population served is
approximately 5,500 which is estimated to increase to approximately 6,000 during the
summer months.
Adjacent land uses to the site include a low lying wood lot, wetlands and agricultural
fields to the northwest, an aggregate (sand and gravel pit) to the northeast, a wood lot
and low lying wetlands to the southeast, and land consisting of grasses, shrubs and trees
to the southwest. General topography, surface water drainage, and the hydrogeological
assessment of the site are included in Section 2 of this report.
There is one access road entering the site from the northwest at Downie Line. The gate
across the access road is locked whenever the landfill is closed or the attendant is not
present.
The site is bounded at each property boundary by natural forest and marshlands to deter
illegal access to the site. A temporary access road is maintained to access the active
landfill area. This road will be modified accordingly as waste disposal proceeds.
There is one attendant building on-site that is constructed on grade. There are no utilities
(electricity, gas, water, sanitary sewers, or phone) to the site. The site operator has a cell
phone in case of emergencies.
Existing signs include an entrance sign and signs denoting bins for recyclable material. As
per Condition 16 of the Amended C of A, the entrance sign states the owner's name and
hours of operation, the operator's name, the Provisional Certificate of Approval No., the
type of waste accepted, and a contact telephone number to call with complaints or in
the event of an emergency.
WESA
~,Y Page 16
2008 Annual Site Monitoring and Operations Report Preliminary Draft
West Elgin Landfill Site For Discussion Purposes Only
Landfill operating hours are from 8am to 5pm on Wednesday and Friday, and gam to 4
pm on Saturday. From December to March the operating hours change to 10am to 5prn
on Wednesday and Friday, and gam to 4 pm on Saturday.
Waste disposal records are kept at the local municipal offices. The Municipality of West
Elgin maintains a record of daily site operations, a record of complaints, a record of site
inspections, and a record of unacceptable waste for the West Elgin Landfill as per
Conditions 25 through 28 of the C of A, at the local municipal offices.
During the environmental monitoring events, WESA completes a landfill inspection and
maintenance record to determine if any adjustments are required for the operation of the
West Elgin Landfill. The completed inspection records for Spring, Fall and Winter 2008
are included in Appendix D.
3.3 WASTE DISPOSAL
The West Elgin Landfill site is currently licensed for the disposal of domestic and
commercial waste.
Waste surveys were conducted in February and April 2008 to identify the source of the
waste and recyclable materials, and the number of bags disposed of each day. The waste
survey conducted during this time period confirms the types of wastes and recyclables
collected at the West Elgin Landfill and is consistent with the waste survey conducted in
by the Municipality in February 2007.
In May 2007, WESA conducted a one-day waste audit to provide an approximate
average weight per bag of waste, as well as per car, truck, and van load accepted at the
West Elgin Landfill. In addition, the number of bags of waste collected from residential
versus commercial sources was counted during the survey.
Based on the May 2007 waste survey, the assumed average weight per bag is 5.2 kg and
the assumed number of bags per car, truck, and van is 3.3, 3.3, and 3, respectively. The
measured weight for pick-up runs from the residential areas has also been used to
calculate the total amount of waste coming into the landfill.
WESA
} &-,i, , h,, r....... Page 17
2008 Annual Site Monitoring and Operations Report Preliminary Draft
West Elgin Landfill Site For Discussion Purposes Only
As part of the daily records, the Municipality tracks the number of cars, trucks, and vans
entering the facility to drop off waste. In addition, they also track the pick-ups from local
residential communities and trailer parks. Based on the average weight per bag, per car,
per truck and per van, as well as the total brought in for commercial and residential pick-
ups, the total waste brought for deposit in the West Elgin Landfill in 2008 was
approximately 410 tonnes.
This quantity of waste does not include non-hazardous contaminated soil that was
brought to the site for use as daily cover material (refer to Section 3.6).
Domestic waste represents greater than an estimated 90% of the waste entering the
landfill. The domestic waste was delivered by commercial hauler or individual drop-off
and is typically comprised of the following:
• Mixed household garbage
• Plastic
• Glass
• Aluminum and tin cans
• Scrap metal
• Roof shingles
• Newspapers
Large items such as discarded appliances, furniture, and mattresses, are collected by the
haulers or delivered to the waste disposal site for recycling, re-use or deposition at the
landfill. Clean wood and brush are collected in a pile to the west of the approved waste
limits and burned.
Commercial waste represents less than an estimated 10% of the waste generated in the
municipality. Commercial waste is delivered by commercial hauler and includes:
• Paper and cardboard
• Restaurant kitchen waste
• Scrap metal
• Plastics
WESA
: Page 18
2008 Annual Site Monitoring and Operations Report Preliminary Draft
West Elgin Landfill Site For Discussion Purposes Only
Based on the information supplied to WESA by the municipality, the West Elgin Landfill
recycles a combined estimated average total of 217 tonnes of material in 2008. Although
this number is an average and considers recyclables collected in both 2007 but not
removed until 2008, as well as recyclables collected in 2008 and removed in 2008, this
number constitutes approximately 52% of the total material the landfill received in
2008.
The following is a breakdown of the recycled material received at the site, on an average
annual basis (average calculated from estimated quantities of recyclables in 2004 through
2008):
• Scrap metal, 95.4 tonnes
Glass, 29.1 tonnes
• Paper, 28.6 tonnes
• Plastic, 31.6 tonnes
• Aluminum and steel cans, 19.7 tonnes
• Cardboard, 12.2 tonnes
The estimated quantities of recyclables has been adjusted for 2004 through 2007 in the
above calculation based on a re-evaluation material removed from site for those
corresponding years.
3.4 FINAL CONTOURS AND SITE CAPACITY
The final contours plan is shown in Figure 10. The Municipality of West Elgin has placed
cement blocks to delineate the limit of the landfill in adherence to Figure 10. The final
contours are based on the local topography of the site and the estimated footprint area
of 1.42 hectares. All side slopes will be constructed to a maximum 250/0 grade. The
crown of the landfill will be constructed to a minimum 5% grade to promote surface
water runoff.
In 1984, MOE staff estimated the site capacity to be 100,600 m3. Prior to this time, the
site did not have an approved capacity. Based on the final contours plan included in this
report, the total site capacity is 134,823 m3.
MESA
, i-";,.,,,..,
Page
19
2008 Annual Site Monitoring and Operations Report Preliminary Draft
West Elgin Landfill Site For Discussion Purposes Only
Using this site capacity and based on the June 2006 contours at the site, the estimated
quantity of in-place waste is 110,884 m3 (WESA,2006).
Based on an estimated annual waste input rate of 410 tonnes, a compaction density of
0.5 tonne/m3 and a waste to cover ratio of 4:1, the annual air space utilization rate for
the site is calculated to be 1025 m3/annum. Using the estimated quantity of in-place
waste, calculated utilization rates, and a projected annual population (le., waste) growth
rate of 0.5% over the next 25 years, the estimated life of the landfill is 19 years from
December 2008 (that is, until December 2026). The estimated remaining site capacity as
of December 2008 is 21,503 m3.
Note that any estimate of remaining site life is highly sensitive to variations in waste
characteristics, waste generation rates, cover material utilization, waste compaction and
recycling efforts. The above projection of site life should therefore be interpreted as a
rough estimate only, and should be reviewed annually against actual changes in the
landfill volumes.
3.5 2008 SITE OPERATIONS
The Hydrogeological Investigation and Design and Operations Report prepared by
WESA (VESA, 2006) provides a detailed phased development plan for Landfill
operations over the site life.
In 2008, a total of 5 loads of clay were placed on the edge of the laneway as final cover,
however no other final cover was placed on the landfill foot print. Interim cover is
placed over the active face on a weekly basis. All locations that are not part of the active
face should be covered with 300 mm of intermediate cover material as discussed in the
WESA 2006 report. The municipality has placed cement blocks to visually delineate the
30 m buffer area so that the site operator can place waste to the edge of the design area
without extending into the buffer area.
As per Condition 18 of the Amended C of A, daily cover or suitable alternative must be
placed over the entire active face at the end of every operating week. In 2008, daily soil
cover is placed on the active face at the end of each operating day.
~ii WESA
Page 20
2008 Annual Site Monitoring and Operations Report Preliminary Draft
West Elgin Landfill Site For Discussion Purposes Only
The Hydrogeological Investigation and Design and Operations Report prepared by
WESA (\VESA, 2006) outlines the requirement for active face operations at the landfill.
The active face should be kept to a maximum width of 10. m wide. The height of the
active face should be the shorter of 1.5 m or the distance to the final waste contour. Site
inspections in 2008 indicate that the active face is within the 10 m width requirement
and the height is greater than the 1.5 m recommendation. Site inspection forms are
provided in Appendix D.
The natural surface water drainage at the site is controlled by the low topographic relief.
There are no on-site drains and little evidence of surface water ponding or channels were
identified during WESA's site visits. The landfill is situated on a local topographic high
and therefore surface water run-on has not been a problem.
According to the site operator, the site did not have concerns associated with litter, noise,
dust, odour, or vectors in 2008. The May and October site inspections conducted by
WESA did note some minor litter beyond the landfill footprint, however an inspection in
December 2008 identified that litter had been picked up and was being picked up on a
regular basis. The site currently maintains a record of complaints received about the site
or any environmental emergency situations that occur at the site at the local municipal
offices. There were no complaints in the log for 2008.
Site inspections performed by WESA in May and October 2008 indicated that recyclable
materials storage could be better contained and improved so that mixing of materials
does not occur. This task was completed and the inspection performed by WESA in
December 2008 indicated that excess recyclables had been removed. Bins used to collect
recyclables must be kept in good condition without leaks as per Condition 24 of the
Amended C of A
3.6 CHANGES TO OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES AND INFRASTRUCTURE
There were no changes to operational procedures or infrastructure.
,Mj
WESA
Page 21
2008 Annual Site Monitoring and Operations Report Preliminary Draft
West Elgin Landfill Site T For Discussion Purposes Only
4.0 RECOMMENDATIONS
The recommendations derived from 2008 annual site monitoring and operations for the
West Elgin Landfill site are outlined below. The recommendations for the Annual Site
Monitoring and Reporting and Site Operations are consistent with those from the
previous annual reports. Recommendations for the contaminant attenuation zone (CAZ)
are consistent with those in the Subsurface Investigation and Leachate Delineation (WESA,
2007).
Annual Site Monitoring and Reporting
1. The site groundwater monitoring network should be sampled in the spring and fall
2009 for a full set of parameters, as listed in Table 3 and 4 of this report, to establish
site conditions. Subsequent monitoring should take place twice per year (spring and
fall) for each of the following years.
2. By no later than April 30th, 2009, and by April 301h of every year thereafter a site
operation and environmental monitoring report will be prepared and submitted to
the Ministry of the Environment. This recommendation is outlined in the provisional
Certificate of Approval for this site.
Annual Operations Report
1. The landfill site should continue to maintain a record of daily site operations,
monthly site inspections conducted by a trained person, all occurrences of receipt of
unacceptable waste, and complaints received about the site or any environmental
emergency situations that occur at the local municipal offices. In order for the landfill
site to be in compliance with the Amended C of A, these records containing the
information specified in Conditions 25 through 28 must be maintained.
2. It is recommended that the site operator and the Municipality meet on a monthly
basis to provide records on waste accepted, quantities recycled, and to review the
completed landfill inspections and the inspection results.
3. The site operator should continue to use the delineated landfill footprint to ensure
operations adhere to the detailed phased development plan and active face
operations as provided in the Hydrogeological Investigation and Design and
Operations Report (WESA, 2006).
WESA
Page 22
2008 Annual Site Monitoring and Operations Report Preliminary Draft
West Elgin Landfill Site For Discussion Purposes Only
4. Bins used to collect recyclables must be kept in good condition without leaks as per
Condition 24 of the Amended C of A.
5. A layout of recycling collection bins and burn pile sorting area has been developed
and is shown in Figure 11.
6. As per Condition 18 of the Amended C of A, daily cover must be placed over the
entire active face with a minimum thickness of 150 mm of soil cover at the end of
every operating day. As stated, a tarp can be used as an alternative and the
Municipality should continue its efforts in utilizing this tarp. Final cover should be
placed over the areas where the waste footprint is within the 30 m buffer area.
Contaminant Attenuation Zone
To fulfill the requirements of the Reasonable Use Guideline (MOE Guideline B-7) and the
contaminant attenuation zone (CAZ), the Municipality has two recommended options;
purchase surrounding property, or, 2- purchase the water rights and obtain land access
agreements for the surrounding properties. Based on the conclusions of the leachate
delineation study (WESA, 2007) a 30 m buffer to the south-southeast and a 50 m buffer
to the south have been proposed. The recommended extent of the CAZ satisfies the
current MOE requirements and allows for some additional buffer room if required. At
this time no action is needed towards the southwest (MW10). The Municipality is
exploring there options at this time and will await comment from the MOE before
proceeding.
WESA
Page 23
01
West Elgin Chamber of Commerce
P.O. Box 276, Rodney, ON. NOL 2C0
April 13, 2009 t c svco sr¢
Mayor and Council ~1 29
The Municipality of West Elgin 22413 Hoskins Line
PO Box 490
Rodney, Ontario. NOL 2C0
Rc: Proposed Modification to Draft Official Plan for The Municipality of West Elgin
At its April general meeting the West Elgin Chamber of Commerce had the opportunity to discuss the proposed
modification indicated above. The Chamber asked its' executive members to review the modification in more
detail and respond on behalf of the group. After due consideration, the Executive feels that there are no
substantive issues with the proposed modification and wishes to express its' recognition of the importance of
encouraging the proposed development at Port Glasgow. The Executive is of the opinion that a well-planned
and carefully executed development at the intended location holds much promise for the economic viability of
the entire community. This is an opportunity that the community cannot afford to miss. Please make every
effort to adapt the Draft Official Plan to accommodate the proposed development.
Yours truly,
Keith Fretter
Vice-President
West Elgin Chamber of Commerce
Tel. 519-785-0916
Email: keith@theirispatch.ca
D aj
West Elgin Chamber of Commerce
P.4. Box 276, Rodney, ON. NOL 2C0
April 9, 2009
Mayor and Council
The Municipality of West Elgin
22413 Hoskins Line
PO Box 490
Rodney, Ontario. NOL 2C0
REC01VEI) V e ki
Ai I ~ 2909
Re: Draft Community Improvement Plan
The West Elgin Chamber of Commerce would like to go on record as being strongly in support of the general
direction of the draft plan noted above. Individual members have been urged to attend the Public Meeting
planned for April 30, 2009 and the Chamber executive will have members in attendance.
It was the consensus of members present at our April 7 meeting that it would be logical to start with the creation
of a Business Improvement Area and the association of businesses that this implies. From that point forward,
the Association should be involved with the implementation and possible modification of the rest of the plan.
Maintaining strong connections between the association that would be formed under the proposed plan and the
Chamber of Commerce would also be vital to the success of the venture. Given that the Chamber's meetings are
typically held within the area that is encompassed by the BIA, perhaps there could be mutual membership of
each organization by the other. It also makes sense, when attempting to build a new entity and achieve `buy-in'
from potential members, to consider more creative ways of funding the organization in the formative first two
years.
We look forward to early adoption of the Community Improvement Plan and the opportunity to get to work on
driving more business to the area.
Yours truly,
00
Keith Fretter
Vice President
West Elgin Chamber of Commerce
Tel. 519-785-0916
Email: keith@theirispatch.ca
Canad
Dear Head of Council,
ankirVrCiPaIITY OF NEST OWN
n
2009
Ontario
The current economic crisis is of great concern to all Canadians.
Both the Government of Canada and the Government of Ontario have
undertaken and are committed to making significant investments to help
communities weather this economic storm and get much needed stimulus money
into the economy.
Through the recent federal and provincial budgets, our
governments have recognized that improving Ontario's infrastructure backbone
will also help boost the economy, create jobs and will improve the daily quality of
life in communities across the province. We want to take this opportunity to tell
you about a new way for you to have your municipality's short-term priority
infrastructure projects that can be built within two years identified for funding
consideration.
As many of you know, we recently announced 290 projects in Ontario valued at
over one billion dollars under the Communities Component of Building Canada.
The Government of Ontario and the Government of Canada remain committed to
working together to continue to build modern public infrastructure in our
municipalities across Ontario. In its Budget 2009, the federal government
announced a Communities Component Top-Up of $500 million available to
municipalities for projects that could be started and completed by March 31,
2011. The Government of Ontario has set aside matching funds for Ontario's
portion of the Top-up funding in its recent provincial budget.
We are launching a new intake for applications for the remaining
funding and for the Top-up Funds available under the Communities Component
of Building Canada for municipalities of under 100,000 people.
The Government of Canada has also announced the creation of a
new $4-billion Infrastructure Stimulus Fund, aimed at getting shovels in the
ground for infrastructure projects that can be completed over the next two years.
The Government of Ontario will match this federal funding and work together with
the Government of Canada to ensure that these funds are delivered
expeditiously and efficiently to municipalities in the province. These funds are
focused on the rehabilitation of existing assets, but new construction is eligible,
D3
provided it can be fully completed by March 31, 2011, and it represents an
incremental investment on the part of the municipality.
The Infrastructure Stimulus Fund works by having the federal and
provincial governments match municipal contributions towards infrastructure
projects on an equal basis. All parties share one-third of the total eligible project
cost. This funding will help create jobs and provide much-needed stimulus to the
economy. It will also help municipal governments meet their varied and growing
infrastructure needs.
Proponents will be required to attest that the projects would not
have been built over the next two construction seasons without the federal and
provincial funding. A program guide and a very short application form can be
accessed at: www.bcfontario.ca. Your municipality can complete applications for
up to three economic stimulus projects. You can also access application forms
for the Communities Component of the Building Canada Fund through this web
site. Municipalities are encouraged to contact the Canada-Ontario Infrastructure
Secretariat at 1-866-306-7827 to get a username and password to access the
on-line application form.
All applications are due on May 1, 2009. Successful proponents
will be notified quickly so that construction may begin. Financial agreements will
be signed between the Province of Ontario and municipalities. Prior to final
approval of your funding and the conclusion of an agreement with the Province,
the Municipality must provide proof of Council support for the approved project
and the municipal contribution.
We hope that you share our enthusiasm for this significant new
funding and our new streamlined application process. We believe that it will
make our decision-making process more efficient and get this much-needed
infrastructure money flowing faster.
We look forward to learning more about your municipality's
infrastructure priorities. We value our collaboration with municipal governments
in ensuring Ontario's infrastructure needs are met.
Sincerely,
L9L~ 4&11~
-0
John Baird, P.C., M.P.
Canada's Minister of Transport,
Infrastructure and Communities
George Smitherman, M.P.P.
Ontario's Deputy Premier and
Minister of Energy and
Infrastructure
519 637 3358 Joe Preston MP
Ottawa
Confederation Bldg, Room 142
Ottawa, ON K1A OA6
Tal: (613) 990-7769
Pax: (613) 996-0194
www.joeprestonmp.ca
f®e. Prestos NP
Eggin glfidAesex-London
To The Mayor, Members of Council and. Administration'
09:56:25 a.m_ 04-15-2009 214
D~
Constituency
24 First Avenue, Unit 2
St. Thomas, ON NSR 4M5
Tel: (519) 637-2255
Pax: (519) 637-3358
Toll Free: 1-866-404-0406
We are launching ,a new intake for applications for the remaining funding and
for the Top-up Funds available under the Communities Component of Building Canada for
municipalities of under 100,000 people.
Proponents will be required to attest that the projects would not have been built
over the next two construction seasons without the federal and provincial funding. A program
guide and a very short application form can be accessed at- www.bcfontario.ca..Your
municipaIity.can complete applications for up to three economic stimulus projects. You can also
access application forms for the Communities Component of the Building Canada Fund through
this web site. Municipalities are encouraged to contact the Canada-Ontario Infrastructure
Secretariat at 1-866-306-7827 to get a username and password to access the on-lime application
form.
All applications are due on May 1, 2009. Successful proponents will be notified
quickly so that construction may begin. Financial agreements will be signed between the
Province of Ontario and municipalities. Prior to final approval of your funding and the
conclusion of an agreement with the Province, the Municipality must provide proof of Council
support for the approved project and the municipal contribution.
We hope that you share our enthusiasm for this significant new funding and our
new streamlined application process. We believe that it will make our decision-making process
more efficient and get this much-needed infrastructure money flowing faster..
Although our office has received a list of priority projects from your
community we want to remind you that a formal application is necessary and request that you
advise our office of the projects that you are applying for.
Preston
Member of Parliament
Elgin-Middlesex-London
519 637 3358 Joe Preston MP 09:56:41 a.rn _ 04-15-2009 314
17U"L4j11g l.iu14 UiA - %_.U1111AAU1uUUcJ L, V111~.JVU.G1l11 ra6u A UL I
® A~ Infrastructure
i ci,i66
il*
Canada
Home a Media Centre - News Releases
Communities Component
New in Canada's Economic Action Plan
Through Canada's Economic Action Plan; the federal government will top up the Building Canada
Fund's Communities Component to accelerate infrastructure projects in small communities. An
additional $500 million has been committed over the next two years, which will be allocated to
projects that are ready to get started, and will be completed, In the next two construction seasons.
About the Program
The Communities Component of the Building Canada Fund recognizes that smaller communities
have unique infrastructure needs, and therefore targets projects In communities with populations
of less than 100,000. Projects are selected through an application-based process.
Projects are cost-shared on a one-third basis among federal, provincial and municipal
counterparts. Projects related to safe drinking water, disaster mitigation, brownfield
redevelopment, and local roads and bridges are funded through the Communities Component.
How it Works
Municipalities will be able to participate in-the applications-based programs that are managed to
best fit circumstances in each province. Application intakes will take place in each province and
those intakes will be communicated to municipalities. Projects will be eligible under the existing
seventeen categories of the Communities Component. Through the extra $500 million, work
funded must be completed within two years. Furthermore, the existing Communities Component
allocation for a province must be committed to projects before municipalities in that province can
access the $500 million top-up.
Who is Eligible?
Canadian municipalities with a population of less than 100,000, as determined by the Statistics
Canada's Final 2006 Census, are eligible to apply for funding under the Communities Component.
A private sector body or non-profit organization whose application is supported by a Council
resolution from the local municipality could also apply.
March 26, 2009
Date Modified: 2009-04-09
http:l/www.buildingeanada-chantierscanada. ge. calmedialnews-nouvellesl2009/cc-vc-eng.... 15/04/2009
51 B 637 3358 Joe Preston MP 09:56:59 a_m. 04-15-2009 4 14
our-untarlo: t-,On]1]]11nnies rage I of 1
FRANr,Ais i HOME I CONTACT US I PARTNERS I CANADA.CA I ONTARIO.CA
Home > Communities 7 Intoke 2
About Us Intake 2
News
Intake Two of the Communities Component Is open for business - Apply Now!
Communities
ISF Application: Applications can be submitted online
Contact (Is For login Information, please call the Joint Secretariat at 1-666-306-7827.
Deadline: Applications must be received no later than 5:00p.m. EST an May 1, 2009
Migible project categolkles: Under Intake Two there are 18 project categories. To be
deemed eligible a project must fall under one of these categories. Each eligible application is
evaluated against how It meets the relevant project category's specific objectives,
mandatory screening criteria, and project benefits. The project must also be directly related
to one of Its sub-categories.
• Brownfield Redevelopment.
• Collaborative Projects
• Connectivity And Broadband
• Core National Highway System
• Culture
o Disaster Mitigation
• Drinking Water
• Green Energy
• Local And Regional Airports
• Local Roads
• Public Transit
• Recreation *NOW,
• Shortline Railways
• short-Sea Shipping
• Solid Waste Management
• sport
• Tourism
• Wastewater Infrastructure
Selection Process: Once assessed, applications are reviewed by a joint federal-provincial
oversight Committee that forwards recommendations for funding to senior governments for
approval.
Online Guide
Application-
FAQs
Agreement
http://www.bcfontario.ca/english/communities/Intake2/index.html 15/04/2009
4-1 ntario
Canada