Loading...
April 23, 2009MUNICIPALITY OF WEST ELGIN AGENDA COUNCIL MEETING APRIL 23, 2009 Council Chambers, West Elgin Municipal Building DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST APPROVAL OF AGENDA DELEGATIONS: 9:30 a. m. Lorne McLeod re: proposed severance (131) 1:30 p.m. Mr. Pearce, 214 Graham Road re: various issues 2:00 p.m. WESA re: Annual Report (C8a) 2:30 p.m. Grace McGartland re: Arts & Cookery Bank 3:00 p.m. Jeff Slater re: arena parking lot quotes PLANNING: (131-136) (See also correspondence items #1 and #2) 1.* Proposed severance - Lot Z, Concession 2 2.* Community Improvement Plan Draft #2 (under separate cover) 3.* Workplan for Class EA for marina improvements (Tables 1 & 2 available at meeting) 4.* Report re: Official Plan modification Seaside Developments 5. Seaside Developments - Submission of Pre-Consultation Report and draft plan 6.* Report re: Storage/Shipping Containers REPORTS: (C1-C8) 1. ROADS 2. RECREATION 3. BUILDING April 23, 2009 .............Page 2 4. WATER 5. BY-LAW ENFORCEMENT 6. DRAINS 7. WEST ELGIN PRIMARY SYSTEM 8. ADMINISTRATION a) *WESA Annual Report b) Building Canada Fund application Intake 2 c) JEPP funding application d) Enabling Accessibility Fund Program application e) Manulife renewal f) Election - ward boundaries g) 2009 Budget ACCOUNTS CORRESPONDENCE: (D1-D5) 1.* West Elgin Chamber of Commerce - proposed modification to Official Plan 2.* West Elgin Chamber of Commerce - Community Improvement Plan 3.* John Baird, MP and George Smitherman, MPP re: Building Canada Fund 4.* Joe Preston, MP re: Building Canada Fund 5. Jim Bundschuh, County Treasurer re: Police Services Board Budget BY-LAWS: By-law No. 2009-29 Agreement with MTO - transit funding April 23, 2009 .............Page 3 OTHER BUSINESS: (E1) Closed session, if deemed necessary `information enclosed CONFIRMING BY-LAW ADJOURNMENT NEXT MEETINGS • April 23, 2009 Council • April 30, 2009 Special Council Meeting re: Budget, 9:00 a.m. • April 30, 2009 Public Meeting re: Community Improvement Plan International Club, 7.00 p.m. B! MINIM NW, i tt `1 S I 16 April, 2009 Community Planners Inc. fvliddlesex Counb y Building 399 Ridout Street North London, Ont-Wo W N 2?1 (519) S$3-1123 l:ax: (019) 438-7770 e-bail: ior~don rr cflr~zr;^r:nit~l^nref-s.e:~lr MEMORANDUM TO: Members of Council Municipality of West Elgin FROM: Ted L. Halwa PAU ICHIALI'rY MST eLGIN RECOWD APR 2 0 2009 #0008 SUBJ: Proposed Severance - Robin & Maria Welts - 26685 Crinan Line - Part of Lot Z, Concession II - south side of Crinan Line - west of Dunborough Road 1. Purpose • to create a lot out of a 40.5 hectare (100 acre) parcel for the purpose of disposing a surplus farm dwelling; • the lands proposed to be conveyed have a frontage of 76 metres (250 ft), a depth of 131 metres (430 ft) and an area of 1.0 hectares (2.5 acres). The parcel is occupied by an older single unit dwelling (erected circa 1910), barn and shed. The shed straddles the proposed side lot line and is to be re-located. No change in use is proposed; • the lands being retain have a frontage of 524 metres (1,719 ft) on Crinan Line, a flankage of 700 metres (2,297 ft) on Dunborough Road and an area of 39.5 hectares (97.5 acres). The parcel has been cleared extensively for agricultural purposes with the exception of a small woodlot in the southwest corner of the farm. Several small oil pumping and storage units are situated in the easterly portion of the farm. No change in use is proposed; • the current owners of the subject lands, Robin & Maria Weits, have resided in the dwelling for approximately 10 years. They intend to convey the lands (in total) to Lorne and Ryan McLeod who are prepared to purchase the lands on the assurance that they would be able to sever the surplus farm residence; • neighbouring lands comprise a mix of agricultural use, primarily cash crop, interspersed with scattered residential lots. A large woodlot extends to the south of the subject lands. No intensive livestock operations have been identified in the vicinity of the proposed lot. Robin & Maria Welts 26685 Crinan Line Part of Lot Z, Concession II Municipality of WEST ELGIN AIR PHOTO R ~ L E ia" Y I t- ~k1 i$ ~ ~M.+kY Sk 41.7 Y ~ i t r Fib- 5 ~ 'fy L l~ J ~ r~ t f 1 } - At k v! _ ~ ! i J ~ ~ 1 }s r : Y 1 f L _ 1 I t l~1 ~~y _F F -~Ti ~,'7 r to;76 fTl t. s std t F;~ 't€Lip A LCD 2F] ~ tiTI~ < CRII~ANLINS= ` 'As1?~`c f tr' 1 ha (2.47 ac.) (}z 39.5 ha f! lid z~ (97,5 aC) t _ CELTIC_LINE. lff t n,~~ ~ ; z~` ~ . ~ f 9~ r e'er 7's• ~ b~ ' 1 fl Fit ~ '>..V t - if It i i'r: , .}r. ".x ,c , r- < _ 1F>;n 4`n ~?sr .s~'w.'i1GY,t+'`~ ~ p, ~,T'; t4.- rr yr it { ka r oN X04`. nn"~ 4Aiy. .~4 f i ~ ' l Kt k- f r L r -O r , Sr r a 'e R w . 4, il LANDS PROPOSED TO BE CONVEYED 0 SCALE 1: 7,500 Metres LANDS PROPOSED TO BE RETAINED 0 50 100 200 300 400 L ~~a n r lln~rvl oJn l'' Robin & Maria Welts - Proposed Severance #0008 Municipality of West Elgin April 16, 2009 page 2 2. Provincial Policy Statement {PPS} and Official Plan • in prime agricultural areas, the creation of a lot for the purpose of disposing a residence surplus to a farming operation is permitted by the PPS. A surplus residence is defined as an existing farm residence that is rendered surplus a result of farm consolidation. Farm consolidation is defined by the PPS as: the acquisition of additional farm parcels to be operated as one farm operation; • in this instance, the dwelling on the lands being conveyed is considered surplus to the needs of the proposed purchasers, Lorne and Ryan McLeod, whose principle residence (and home farm) is located at 14094 Dunborough Road in the Municipality of Dutton Dunwich. The McLeods own and farm approximately 243 hectares (600 acres) of land elsewhere in the Municipality of West Elgin; the PPS requires that residential dwellings are prohibited on any vacant remnant parcel of farmland created by the severance. Such a restriction is appropriately addressed as a condition of consent, if granted, through the application of a 'site-specific' zoning consistent with past practice in the Municipality. The application would be consistent with the PPS; • the subject lands are designated 'Agricultural' in the Township of Aldborough Official Plan. The creation of residential lots in such areas to dispose surplus farm dwellings is permitted provided: a) the dwelling was in existence prior to adoption of the Plan; b) it is not practical or feasible to relocate the dwelling to an existing vacant lot; c) the dwelling is structurally sound and suitable for human occupancy,• d) the remainder of the farm is zoned to prohibit a dwelling (Section 2.1.15). the abovenoted criteria are satisfied or are capable of being satisfied as addressed elsewhere in this report. There is no stipulation in the Plan or the PPS for that matter that the principle residence of the owner (or proposed owners in this instance) be located in the Municipality of West Elgin. Mr. Lorne McLeod has advised that the dwelling and the barn are structurally sound and require only cosmetic improvements; • other criteria to be satisfied include compatibility with surrounding lands use, availability of water supply, suitability of the lot for on-site sanitary waste disposal, access and compliance with the Zoning By-law. The }ppommui~{Epij~ry~~1y}~y 1~~~~ planneva X311 iFc Robin & Maria Welts - Proposed Severance #0008 Municipality of West Elgin April 16, 2003 page 3 lands being conveyed have an existing entrance to Crinan Line. Access to the lands being retained is available from Dunborough Road and Crinan Line and no additional entrances are required or proposed. With respect to sanitary waste disposal, confirmation will be required to ensure that the existing septic tank and tile field system is wholly contained on the proposed lot which, based on the sketch provided, appears to be the case. This matter is appropriately addressed as a condition of consent, if granted; conformity with the Official Plan of the Township of Aldborough appears capable of being maintained; the size of the proposed lot, at 1.0 hectares (2.5 acres), is somewhat large for rural residential purposes although justifiable under the circumstances. The proposed lot boundaries are determined by the location of the dwelling and the barn, the on-site water supply and sanitary waste disposal system serving the dwelling. The loss of agricultural land appears to have been minimized by confining the new lot boundaries to landscaped open space not under cultivation. 3. Zoning By-law • the subject lands are zoned Agricultural (Al). The proposed residential lot (i.e. lands being conveyed) would require a re-zoning to Special Agricultural (A2) given its use and size. The lot would satisfy the minimum lot area, maximum lot area and minimum lot frontage requirements (4,000 sq m, 1.0 ha and 50 m respectively) of the A2 zone; • the lands being retained would satisfy the minimum lot area and lot frontage requirements (19 ha and 150 m respectively) of the Al zone. A re-zoning to 'site-specific' Agricultural (A14) would be required to prohibit a dwelling being erected on the parcel in the future as stipulated by the PPS and the Official Plan; 4. Conclusions the proposed severance would represent a type of lot creation which is both contemplated and permitted by the Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) and the Township of Aldborough Official Plan. The Official Plan provides for the creation of lots occupied by dwellings considered surplus to the farm operation and suitable for habitation. There is no particular stipulation regarding ownership of the farm or residency of the prospective owners, only Cormunr1w nn,OF~_s Inc ;r Robin & Maria Weits - Proposed Severance Municipality of West Elgin April 16, 2009 page 4 #0008 that the acquisition of additional farm parcels to be operated as one farm operation be taking place which is the case in this instance. 5. Recommendation That the proposed application for consent be supported (based on the lands being transferred in title to Lorne and Ryan McLeod) subject to the following conditions and, upon receipt of an Application for Consent in the name of Lorne and Ryan McLeod, the Elgin Land Division Committee advised accordingly: i) That the requirements of the Municipality, if any, are satisfied with respect to the existing on-site sanitary waste disposal system serving the dwelling on the lands being conveyed; ii) That the lands being conveyed be re-zoned to Special Agricultural (A2) to permit their size and use for residential purposes; iii) That the lands being retained be re-zoned `site-specific' Agricultural (A1-#) to prohibit the erection of a dwelling thereon in the future. REASONS i) The severance is 'consistent with' the Provincial Policy tatement; ii) Conformity with the Official Plan of the Township of Aldborough would be maintained; iii) The requirements of the Township of Aldborough Zoning By-law are capable of being satisfied; iv) The matters set out in the Planning Act would be satisfied; v) A legitimate surplus dwelling scenario would appear to exist. _r- Ted L. Halwa, MCIP, RPP MUNICIPALITY OF WEST ELGIN APPLICATION FOR PROPOSED SEVERANCES PLEASE COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING: I PROPERTY OWNER( evi c NAME: iMc~v~tt ~w VIr2 min~v~ ADDRESS: 26GQ,S"' G" (401L' PHONE: ' Lq r 76 Z 2. LOT S CONCESSION Z ACREACE OF TOTAL PARCEL: 3. PARCEL TO BE SEVERED: ACREAGE ;2 • 41 Ac. FRONTAGE 2504 DEPTH L+3®0 4. ACREAGE TO BE RETAINED: g i ,s 3 Az-, 5. REASONS FOR SEVERING AN AGRICULTURAL PARCEL - SURPLUS DWELLING ONLY IS THE DWELLING SURPLUS TO THE NEEDS OF THE FARM? YES s! NO WHEN WAS DWELLING CONSTRUCTED? el 10 (YEAR) IS THE DWELLING STRUCTURALLY SOUND & SUITABLE OR POTENTIALLY SUITABLE, FOR HUMAN OCCUPANCY? YES 4-of NO WHERE IS YOUR PRINCIPLE RESIDENCE? 4ao9+-t- Tc MUNICIPALITY ►~w6. REASONS FOR SEVERING A PARCEL FOR OTHER THAN FOR SURPLUS DWELLINGS? 7. OTHER COMMENTS: DATE- o SIGNATURE NOTE: There is no charge for the first time Council reviews a proposed severance application. The fee for additional reviews and re-submissions by Council is $100.00 per instance. If you wish to attend the council meeting, please contact the Clerk. Proposed severance applications are reviewed by Council at their meeting held on the 4th Thursday of each month. Please submit this application by the 3`d Wednesday of the month for inclusion in the agenda. FROM :DC JACKSON REALTY FAX NO. :519-633-2132 Apr. 09 2009 09:05AM P2 04108/2009 16:30 5196525360 C, H. EXCA.IATIIG PAGE 01 ~RG44 :AC JFc[SCSOFE Fl4.Tf FFi7C iVa. :~~9^6 i^?132 Rpi•. 09 2009 01:00 PI CONS. 'S' AGREEMENT Robin and Wes Wain 2668 Celli n Line R.R, #1 Wort Lame Con 2, ED N Part Lot 2 100 Aare Farm 'Ibis low xms we bttve oivm W. Lomc McLeod our conmt to do any predimlrAry worla,or m" empWcs, at his c gxwe, re g a lure sweranu of our proputy at 26683 Crwa Lima, Wesi: Eigia T\%p"q c1uwy d M& we 4100 givv Mr. Mclwd ft riOd to am= the v=ds for the putposc of pnefthm q surveyin fba a aeveram mawdon. Robin w 'ts r r . ~ a X29 Smoot Drive. 3t. thotll~s, Onto NSf~ 3C2 (619) 939.2131 Fax (SM 06-2132 J~m ''07 7- / ...,~...~..s f , g ~ f / f" ,i ~ ~ +slL_! s Jot' Vol ~o TF- 47 t-D Ag? 613 CLASS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT STUDY for IMPROVEMENTS to the PORT GLASGOW MARINA WORK PLAN Municipality of West Elgin April 201h, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 OVERVIEW .......,..................,.......2 1.1 Introduction ..................................2 3 1.2 Study Area ti ..................................3 1.3 ves Study Objec 2.0 PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND CONSULTATION ..................................4 2.1 Project Team ..................................4 5 2 2 Government Agencies Consultation . 2 3 Stakeholder Consultation 5 . 2.4 Public Consultation ..................................5 3.0 STUDY TASKS ..................................6 3.1 2 3 Outline Alternative Solutions (Class EA: Phase 2) ..................................6 ..................................7 . 3 3 Selection of Preferred Alternative Solution (Class EA: Phase 2) ..................................7 . 4 3 Alternative Design Concepts for the Preferred Solution (Class EA: Phase 3) • • • • . . 3.5 Class EA Study Documentation (Class EA: Phase 4) . 1 D 4.0 Study Products ................................10 4.1 Study Fees and Study Schedule ................................11 Attachments Resumes - Study Team Timetable and Budget Work Plan Class EA Study - Port Glasgow Marina page 1 Municipality of West Elgin Work Plan for Class Environmental Assessment (EA) Study Port Glasgow Marina 1.0 OVERVIEW 1.1 Introduction The Municipality of West Elgin, situated in the westernmost end of the County of Elgin, is undertaking a Class Environmental Assessment Study (Class EA) to address navigational safety issues related to the marina at Port Glasgow on Lake Erie. The marina is operated by the Port Glasgow Yacht Club, a not-for-profit organization comprised primarily of local boaters. The lands occupied by the marina are owned in part by the Municipality and in part by the Port Glasgow Yacht Club (Figure 1). An agreement exists between the two parties over shared use, operations and improvements. The EA study would build upon the findings and recommendations of the following studies prepared by Shoreplan Engineering Limited and authorized by the Municipality: a) Port Glasgow Marina & Yacht Club, Entrance Feasibility Study, 2006 b) Port Glasgow Marina Entrance Modifications Design Brief, 2008 c) Sediment Transport Impact Assessment for Proposed Harbor Entrance lmprovements, Port Glasgow Marina, 2008. The recommended marina improvements consist of "new shore line works such as off-shore breakwaters, shore-connected breakwaters, groynes and seawalls" identified in the Municipal Engineers Association, Municipal Class Environmental Assessment October 2000 as amended in 2007 document as matters subject to the preparation of a Class EA. The Shoreplan studies anticipate that the entrance modifications to the Port Glasgow Marina for the purposes of improving navigational safety could include the following works: a) dredging of the boating channel, b) acquisition of water lots from the Ministry of Natural Resources, c) realignment of the east pier, d) extension of the west pier and e) construction of breakwaters. Work Plan Class EA Study - Port Glasgow Marina page 2 Based on an nature of the improvements that would be required to improve navigational safety, the Municipality of West Elgin, acting as proponent, proposes to undertake the preparation of a Class EA Study in accordance with the aforementioned Municipal Engineers Association, Municipal Class Environmental Assessment guidelines. The Class EA Study will be carried out as a Schedule C project, in accordance with Phase 1 through Phase 4 of the Class EA planning process. Consultation with Oceans and Fisheries Canada will be undertaken to determine any additional screening requirement under the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act. In addition, confirmation will be sought from the Ministry of Natural Resources that the undertaking qualifies as a Category "B" Project and that the work plan addresses the Ministry's requirements under its Class EA process. A study process has been established to conform to a level considered appropriate given the nature of the works being considered. The Municipality reserves the right to modify the process to accommodate additional information received or new issues or solutions that may arise during the course of the study. 1.2 Study Area The primary study area will consist of the area including and surrounding the Port Glasgow Marina & Yacht Club situated in Lot 6, Con XIV in the former Township of Aldborough now in the Municipality of West Elgin. Upon the identification of alternative solutions (Phase 2) and alternative design concepts (Phase 3) to modify the channel to improve navigational safety, the study area may be expanded to identify and assess the anticipated environmental impacts associated with the alternatives. 1.3 Study Objectives The purpose of the study is to identify alternatives and a preferred design solution to address current issues at Port Glasgow Marina related to navigational safety in a comprehensive, environmentally sound manner in accordance with accepted marine engineering principles which responds to the interests of potentially affected property owners, residents, government agencies, other stakeholders and the general public. The following objectives have been identified: 1. To protect the environment, as defined in the Environmental Assessment At through the wise management of resources and effective monitoring and mitigation measures; 2. To identify a solution which will significantly improve navigational safety with minimal disruption to affected property owners and neighbouring residents and to the natural environment; 3. To provide opportunities for the participation of a broad range of stakeholders to allow for the sharing of ideas, education and evaluation of alternatives; 4. To document the study process and findings in compliance with all phases of the Class Environmental Assessment process. Work Plan Class EA Study - Port Glasgow Marina page 3 The Entrance Feasibility Study prepared by Shoreplan confirmed the need for, and the feasibility of, navigational safety improvements to the Port Glasgow Marina. The study examined three design solutions for improving boater safety. The Class EA Study will identify and examine broader based alternatives prior to evaluating the alternative design solutions already developed, identify additional alternatives if appropriate and provide an examination/evaluation of each alternative. A reasonable range of alternatives will be carried forward for consideration as required to comply with the Class EA process. In consultation with the Ministry of Natural Resources and the Lower Thames Valley Conservation Authority (LTVCA) as well as other federal and provincial agencies, a number of issues have been identified to be examined during the study. These issues include, but are not limited to: a) environmental considerations, b) social and economic considerations, c) viability/effectiveness of alternatives, d) navigational safety, e) maintenance requirements and f) phasing of construction. The aim of the Class EA process will be to identify the `preferred' solution being the alternative which best addresses the 'problem' statement. 2.0 PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND CONSULTATION 2.1 Project Team The study will be undertaken by Community Planners Inc. in association with Shoreplan Engineering Limited, Tarandus Associates Limited and Amos Environment + Planning on behalf of the Municipality of West Elgin. Community Planners Inc. will act as Project Manager. Providing input to the Project Team will be the Municipality, the Port Glasgow Yacht Club, government agencies, stakeholders and the general public. Key members of the Project Team will be: ■ Mr. Ted Halwa, MCIP, RPP, Project Manager, Community Planners Inc. ■ Mr. Milo Sturm, P. Eng., Coastal Engineer Shoreplan Engineering Limited ■ Mr. Don Speller, Biologist Tarandus Associates Limited Work Plan Class EA Study - Port Glasgow Marina page 4 ■ Ms. Janet Amos, MCIP, RPP, Class EA Consultant Amos Environment + Planning The Project Team will be expanded to include persons with various areas of technical expertise on an as-needed basis. The Project Manager will be the primary contact and liaison with the Municipality, the Port Glasgow Yacht Club and the general public. 2.2 Government Agencies Consultation Government agencies to be consulted through the EA process will include but not necessarily limited to: a) Fisheries and Oceans Canada, b) Transport Canada (including the Coast Guard), c) Ministry of Natural Resources, d) Ministry of Environment, e) Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing, f) County of Elgin, g) tower Thames Valley Conservation Authority. The Project Team, under the direction and co-ordination of the Project Manager, will maintain contact with key government agencies at an appropriate level to ensure their interests are considered and taken into account. Early consultation with key government agencies; namely, the Ministry of Natural Resources, the Lower Thames Valley Conservation Authority and Fisheries and Oceans Canada is considered critical to the successful completion of the study. 2.3 Stakeholder Consultation Other stakeholders that will be consulted through the EA process will include: a) Port Glasgow Yacht Club, b) First Nations and c) residents, businesses and property owners which are potentially affected. 2.4 Public Consultation Public consultation is also essential to the success of this study and is ensured through the provisions of the Environmental Assessment Act. Encouraging public input through a process that provides opportunities for learning, sharing and responses will be paramount. The general public will have the opportunity to learn about and provide input at a minimum of four points in the process, namely: Work Plan Class EA Study - Port Glasgow Marina page 5 h) 'Notice of Study Commencement' - to notify the public of the study/problem statement (Phase 1); i) Public Meeting - to review broad alternative solutions, their evaluation and the recommended or 'preferred' alternative (Phase 2); j) Public Meeting to review the alternative design concepts, their evaluation and the recommended or 'preferred' design alternative (Phase 3); k) 'Notice of Study Completion' - to notify the public of the completion of the draft Environmental Study Report (Phase 4) and to provide an opportunity for public review and comments thereon and to elicit any requests for Part 11 Orders (or'bump- up') for the project. A minimum of two instances must be provided for public consultation during the EA process. These occasions will take the form of public meetings in combination with an open house, presentation and opportunities for questions and submissions. Members of the Project Team will attend and participate in the public meetings where their attendance is appropriate. 3.0 STUDY TASKS 3.1 Outline The tasks associated with the Class EA study are listed below. They have been grouped into main headings each representing areas of similar types of activities/analyses or decision points in the process. The study tasks/process has been structured to ensure compliance with the environmental assessment process for Class EAs. 1) Prepare draft 'Problem Statement', define 'Study Area' and confirm (modify as necessary) 'Study Objectives' (Class EA: Phase 1); m) Solicit initial comments from government agencies and key stakeholders; n) Finalize `Problem Statement', 'Study Area' boundary and `Study Objectives'; o) Publish 'Notice of Study Commencement'. p) Undertake background review and analysis (Class EA: Phase 2). Obtain and review all pertinent background studies and documents, characterize existing conditions of the study area including population, land use, marina use and demand, natural features, physiography, shoreline characteristics, fishlaquatic habitat, proposed development and changes in land use and proposed improvements to West Elgin/ Port Glasgow Yacht Club facilities. The profile will rely on existing studies, development proposals and consultation with key stakeholders. Fieldwork and research, as needed, will be undertaken to supplement and verify the information necessary to complete the profile. The purpose of this task will be to establish the 'base line conditions' under which the alternative solutions (Phase 2) and the alternative design concepts (Phase 3) will be identified and evaluated. The findings would be documented into a draft report and male available for public and government agency review. Work Plan Class EA Study - Port Glasgow Marina page 6 3.2 Alternative Solutions (Class EA: Phase 2) In Phase 2, all reasonable alternatives to address the `Problem Statement' will be identified and evaluated. The alternatives would be broadly based and would include relocating the marina to a site that offers safer entry; modifying the existing channel to improve safer entry and abandoning the existing marina. The 'do nothing' alternative would also be addressed to provide a baseline comparison for alternative design solutions. Alternatives and combinations of alternatives that meet the study objectives would be carried forward. Descriptions of each alternative would be compiled along with maps and other supporting materials as necessary. To assess and evaluate the viability of the alternatives, a series of criteria will be developed by which to measure each alternative. The evaluation criteria would include, but not necessarily be limited to, the following: Social Environment a) community b) land use c) land ownership d) accessibility e) outdoor recreation f) public safety g) construction Natural Environment a) fisheries and wildlife b) natural heritage c) shoreline morphology Technical a) feasibility b) approvability Cost a) capital 3.3 Selection of Preferred Alternative Solution (Class EA: Phase 2) Using the evaluation criteria, the alternatives will be evaluated to identify a preliminary 'preferred' solution. A matrix evaluation method may be employed to ensure that each alternative is assessed fairly against the same criteria. Work Plan Class EA Study - Port Glasgow Marina page 7 Based on the 'base line' conditions and the evaluation criteria, the potential impacts and net effects of each alternative will be assessed. At this stage, the characteristics of each alternative will be presented in sufficient detail so that its advantages and disadvantages are identified, environmental impacts addressed and mitigation methods assessed. The preliminary `preferred alternative' or combination of alternatives will be identified along with the reasons for its selection. All government agencies having an interest or potential interest in the project will be notified by direct mail and a notice of public meeting published to solicit comments. Notice of the public meeting will be published on two consecutive occasions in the West Elgin Chronicle and elsewhere as determined by the Municipality. Comments and suggestions will be sought on the following: a) problem statement; b) existing conditions/background/study area profile; c) alternative solutions; d) evaluation criteria; e) evaluation of alternative solutions, and f) preliminary 'preferred' solution. A public meeting will be held consisting of an open house followed by a presentation of the findings to date, the alternatives considered and the preliminary preferred alternative. Ample opportunity will be provided for questions and submissions. A record will be prepared for inclusion in the final study report. As a result of the submissions made or issues raised, additional research or technical review on the study area profile or on the alternatives will be undertaken where considered appropriate to do so. 3.4 Alternative Design Concepts for the Preferred Solution (Class EA: Phase 3) Alternative design concepts will be identified based on accepted marine engineering principles and using the selected evaluation criteria in order to identify a 'preferred' design concept. At this stage and based on existing marine engineering done to date, the alternative design solutions are `east and west pier extension', 'west pier extension' and `offshore breakwater' (Figure 2 - Figure 5). A matrix evaluation method would be employed to ensure that each alternative is assessed against the same criteria. The evaluation criteria will include, but not necessarily be limited to, the following: Social Environment a) quality of life - safety b) access c) recreation d) visual impact Work Plan Class EA Study - Port Glasgow Marina page 8 e) construction Impacts Natural Environment a) fisheries and wildlife b) natural heritage c) water quality d) shoreline morphology e) 16 Mile Creek Technical a) design standards b) channel calming c) reliability/durability d) phasing ability e) approvability f) land and water lot requirements g) mitigation measures h) maintenance requirements Cost a) capital b) operating c) maintenance A detailed evaluation of the potential impacts and net effects (after mitigation) of each alternative design concept based on the evaluation criteria would be undertaken. The process will be an iterative one allowing for the refinement of alternatives, identification of new alternatives and combinations as they arise. At this stage, each alternative design would be presented in sufficient detail so that mitigation methods may be assessed and environmental impacts addressed. The preliminary 'preferred' alternative design concept will be identified along with the reasons for its selection. The second public meeting consisting of an open house followed by a presentation to consider the alternative design concepts and the 'preferred' design will be convened. Opportunities will be provided for questions and submissions. Notice of the public meeting will be published on two consecutive occasions in the West Elgin Chronicle and elsewhere as determined by the Municipality. Work Plan Class EA Study Port Glasgow Marina page 9 3.5 Class EA Study Documentation (Class EA: Phase 4) The results of all the tasks undertaken will be compiled into the Environmental Study Report (Class EA study document). The draft report will describe all components of the project which are to be implemented to address the problem statement and which have satisfied the Class EA process. It will include information on the following: a) design parameters b) functions and design features c) capital cost estimates d) construction requirements. The Environmental Study Report (ESR) will also include the mitigation/implementation measures for the preferred design solution outlining the steps necessary to mitigate any adverse environmental impacts. The ESR will also confirm all permits and approvals required for the project to proceed and a summary of the consultation with government agencies, stakeholders and the public along with how the comments received have been addressed. Copies of the draft report will be forwarded to government agencies for review and comment. All comments received will be reviewed and addressed as necessary prior to the finalization of the report. The final ESR will be presented to Council. `Notice of Study Completion' of the study will be published in the West Elgin Chronicle for the required 30 day review period and made available for review and comments. Any comments or submissions received resulting from the `Notice of Study Completion' will be reviewed and comments provided to the Municipality. 4.0 STUDY PRODUCTS The products arising out of the study will include at a minimum a) `Problem Statement' b) 'Notice of Study Commencement' c) draft ESR d) presentation maps and graphics e) final ESR f) 'Notice of Study Completion' Hard copies of the draft and final ESR will be printed, as necessary, for the Municipality and selected government agencies. Electronic versions will be distributed wherever possible to reduce printing costs. Printed materials, including the display materials for the public meetings will be fully reproducible and available to the Municipality of West Elgin in electronic form. Work Plan Class EA Study - Port Glasgow Marina page 10 4.1 Study Fees and Study Schedule The estimated cost of the study is A detailed breakdown by task and personnel assigned is provided in Table 1. Costs of publications of public notices and mailings, as well as room charges for public meetings would be borne by the Municipality of West Elgin. Due to the work already undertaken with respect to possible improvements to the marina entrance, the Class EA should be capable of being completed in a cost efficient timely manner. The study would take an estimated nine months (April - November 2009) to complete. The timetable to initiate and complete the study is outlined in Table 2. Contacts: Ted Halwa MCIP,RPP Principal & Senior Planner Community Planners Inc. Middlesex County Building 399 Ridout Street North London, Ontario N6A 2P1 Tel: (519) 963-1028 ext. 255 Fax: (519) 438-7770 thalwa@commUnitypianners.com M Sturm, P. Eng. Shoreplan Engineering Limited 139 Merton Street, Suite 631 Toronto ON WS 3G7 416-487-4756 x222 mstrurm shore lan.com Mr. Don Speller Tarandus Associates Limited 18 Regan Ave, Unit 24 Brampton ON L7A 1 C2 905-840-6563 dspellera-tarandus.ca Ms. Janet Amos, MCIP, RPP Amos Environment + Planning 1236 Butter and Egg Road, RR#6 Bracebridge ON P1 L 1 X4 705-764-0580 amos@primus.ca Work Plan Class EA Study - Port Glasgow Marina page 11 94 20 April, 2009 MEMORANDUM TO: Members of Council Municipality of West Elgin FROM: Ted Halwa RE: New Official Plan - Proposed Modification - Seaside Development #0018 As a result of the public meeting held on 19 March 2009 and in written submissions which followed, a number of concerns were raised which warrant Council's attention before proceeding further with the proposed modification. The proposed modification is designed to alleviate issues raised by the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing that the proposed Seaside development is not in conformity with the existing Official Plan for the Township of Aldborough or the new, adopted but as yet unapproved, Official Plan for the Municipality of West Elgin. The concerns raised by the public may be characterized as being of twofold. Concerns were raised as to the appropriateness of proceeding by way of amendment as opposed to modification while other concerns were raised as to the specifics of the development, at both the macro (e.g. job hiring/creation) and at the micro level (e.g. protection of views). On the other hand, there was also support expressed for the modification and for Council to do what was necessary to bring the project to fruition. At a subsequent meeting held with MMAH and representatives of Seaside Waterfronts Inc. and representatives of the Municipality on 15 April 2009 at the Ministry's offices in London, MMAH reiterated its position that it would not support a modification to the new Official Plan as a basis for resolving the concerns it has raised over the issue of conformity. Mr. Bruce Curtis, on behalf of MMAH, expressed the view that the modification was far from minor (although not a statutory criterion) and that proceeding in this manner would be inconsistent with the long established practice of the Ministry throughout the Province. He also pointed out that other municipalities have pursued modifications resisted by regional staff to the deputy minister level to no avail. In one specific instance, the modification, if accepted, would have facilitated local economic development. While it appears the modification being proposed is destined to be refused by the Ministry in light of its position enunciated at the meeting as well as on previous occasions, there is some value in proceeding with a final draft, adopting it by resolution of Council and submitting it formally to the Ministry for consideration. This approach would serve at least two purposes, one being that it would formalize the request by the Municipality and, secondly; it should precipitate a formal response from the Ministry along with reasons related thereto. If the proposal by Seaside ultimately ends up at the Ontario Municipal Board, which is increasingly likely, the Municipality will be able to demonstrate that it pursued a reasonable and New Official Plan - Proposed Modification - Seaside Development Municipality of West Elgin 20 April, 2009 page 2 #0018 practical solution to avoid such a hearing. On the other hand, some members of the public have been critical of the Municipality for pursuing the modification as a wasteful expense in view of the position being taken by the Ministry. Some individuals advocate for the Ministry's position that the matter precede by way of an amendment and not a modification. Our reservations in proceeding by way of an amendment are firstly; that amending the official plan, being currently the Township of Aldborough Official Plan, would be a wasteful exercise as that plan will be repealed upon the approval of the new Official Plan for West Elgin. Secondly, an amendment would be an acknowledgement that the development being proposed by Seaside does not conform to the Official Plan (i.e. existing or proposed) - a position that neither the Municipality nor Seaside has been thus far prepared to accept. In view of the forgoing, it would be appropriate for Council to confirm its directions as to whether to proceed with the modification or by way of amendment (or perhaps do nothing) before any further resources are spent on the draft modification. Although the Ministry has not commented specifically on the modification and is unlikely to do so, given its position on its appropriateness, there are some significant changes to the modification, which, in principle, should make it more appealing to the Ministry. ORIGINAL SIGNED BY Ted L. Halwa, MCIP, RPP 66 rgn I Planners hC. 20 April, 2009 MEMORANDUM #0008 TO: Members of Council Municipality of West Elgin FROM: Ted L. Walwa SUBJ: Storage/Shipping Containers Further to Council's consideration at its meeting of 26 March 2009 of the request by Cory Williams to erect a storage trailer on his property as an accessory building, we have undertaken a preliminary review of these types of structures as well as refurbished shipping containers now on the market for these same purposes. MCS Containers (a division of Marine Container Services Inc.), based in Montreal, offers for sale new and used shipping containers as storage units (both for farm and residential purposes), on-site offices and mobile laboratories. The shipping containers are of all-metal construction with the exception of a wood floor. MCS will customize the containers to suit specific needs. With respect to rust prevention measures, a special hardwearing, anti-corrosive marine paint is applied to the units. The shipping containers range in length from 6.1 metres (20 ft) to 12.2 metres (40 ft), and custom lengths are available as low as 3.0 metres (10 ft). The smaller units (i.e. up to 6.1 m in length) may be practical for built-up residential areas in keeping with the size of other accessory buildings and structures, although their outward appearance is not residential in character. Longer units would appear suitable for agricultural applications. MCS Containers markets the units for a number of uses and does promote the use of the larger units for general storage, hay storage, as a workshop and even as a small livestock barn. Mobile Mini Inc., based in Arizona, offers for sale or rent storage containers units ranging in size from 2.4 m x 3.0 m (8 ft x 10 ft) to 2.4 m x 12.2 m (8ft x 40 ft). The containers are new units as opposed to re-cycled and/or refurbished containers. All units are of steel construction with plywood floors and are finished in a light beige, rust resistant paint. There is no special rust prevention treatment applied and maintenance against rust is the responsibility of the owner, although premature rusting is unlikely. 111 Ili t1` raj- Shipping Containers Municipality of West Elgin April 20, 2009 page 2 #0008 In both the abovenoted cases and similar to other companies dealing with these product, a range of options exists with respect to the number and location of doors. This permits more flexible siting of the storage containers on individual lots and, in turn, potentially easier access. The advantages of using shipping containers for storage purposes is largely related to their construction - solid steel walls and roof with a thick wooden floor render the units virtually indestructible. The units are described as airtight, waterproof, rodent/pest resistant and, when locked and secured, impenetrable. They are readily portable. Examples of typical shipping containers (both new and used) manufactured and refurbished by Storage Systems, based in Toronto, are attached. Under the existing zoning by-laws in effect (Aldborough, West Lorne and Rodney), the use of shipping containers is not expressly prohibited although truck, bus, coach, railway car or streetcar bodies are. Their omission is likely the result of the fact that they were not generally available at the time the by-laws were drafted. This being the case, a shipping container could be argued to constitute an accessory building or structure under the current zoning by-laws and permitted subject to the yard and setback standards applying to accessory buildings or structures. To preclude this from occurring if such was the wish of Council, an interim control by-law could be adopted. The by- law would have the effect of prohibiting the erection of storage containers on lands prescribed in the by-law until a review is undertaken (as required by the Planning Act) which addresses the issues pertaining to their use and maintenance and their impact on neighbouring properties. The review is appropriately undertaken as part of the preparation of the new comprehensive zoning by-law now in preparation for the Municipality of West Elgin. The appropriate control measures could be readily incorporated in the new zoning by-law. The Planning Act permits a municipality to establish the period during which the interim control by-law would be in effect to a maximum of one year from the date of adoption unless the by-law is repealed sooner. At its discretion, Council may extend the period for which the by-law applies for an additional one year period should this prove necessary. There is no statutory notice or public meeting requirements to be fulfilled prior to Council adopting an interim control by-law. Notice of the passing of such a by-law must, however, be given within 30 days of its adoption. Any person or public body may appeal the by-law within 60 days of its adoption. Appeals are heard by the Ontario Municipal Board. _ I .an r 17 07A #0008 Shipping Containers Municipality of West Elgin Apr1120, 2009 page 3 Alternatively, the three zoning by-laws still in effect in West Elgin (of the former municipalities Rodney, West Lorne and Aldborough) could be amended to specifically address these types of structures. Notice would be required and a public meeting convened. Finally, Council could elect to do nothing at this point in time, leaving the issues to be addressed in the new comprehensive zoning by-law now in preparation for West Elgin. Ted L. Halwa, MCIP, RPP USED STORAGE/SHIPPING CONTAINERS NEW STORAGE/SHIPPING CONTAINERS i41 Y l ; gy.~. c ? 2A NEW. CUSTOM CONTAINER CB a) PRELIMINARY DRAFT For Discussion Purposes Only 2008 ANNUAL SITE MONITORING AND OPERATIONS REPORT WEST ELGIN LANDFILL SITE MUNICIPALITY OF WEST ELGIN RODNEY, ONTARIO PREPARED FOR: THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF WEST ELGIN 22413 Hoskins Line, Box 490 Rodney, Ontario NOL 2CO Municipality of Wcst Elgin WESA A t CHU FIlVironment l'or BLOIICSS PRELIMINARY DRAFT For Discussion Purposes Only 2008 ANNUAL SITE MONITORING AND OPERATIONS REPORT WEST ELGIN LANDFILL SITE MUNICIPALITY OF WEST ELGIN RODNEY, ONTARIO Prepared for: Mum.ci.palay of Wcst Elgin THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF WEST ELGIN 22413 Hoskins Line, Box 490 Rodney, ON NOL 2CO Prepared by: MESA A Better Environment For Business WESA Inc. 171 Victoria Street North Kitchener, ON N21-1 5C5 April 2009 File No. W-B4718-05 Ref 84718-05 Annual repel doc 2008 Annual Site Monitoring and Operations Report Preliminary Draft West Elgin Landfill Site For Discussion Purposes Only TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .......................................1 1.1 Background ........................................1 1.2 Limiting Conditions 2 1.3 Site Sensitivity and Comparison Criteria 3 2.0 2007 ENVIRONMENTAL MONTORING PROGRAM ..........................................3 2.1 Methodology ........................................3 2.1.1 Groundwater Monitoring Program 3 2.1.2 Methane Vapour Monitoring 4 2.2 Results and Discussion 5 2.2.1 Site Geology 5 2.2.2 Hydrogeology ........................................6 2.2.3 Vapour Concentrations 8 2.2.4 Groundwater Quality 8 2.2.4.1 Background Groundwater Chemistry and Reasona ble Use Calculations......... 9 2.2.4.2 Leachate Indicator Parameters 9 2.2.4.3 Site Groundwater Quality 11 2.2.4.4 Quality Assessment and Quality Control (QA/QC) ......................................15 3.0 ANNUAL OPERATIONS REPORT ......................................15 3.1 Historical Site Operations .......................................15 3.2 Existing Conditions .......................................16 3.3 Waste Disposal .......................................17 3.4 Final Contours and Site Capacity .......................................19 3.5 2007 Site Operations 20 3.6 Changes to Operational Procedures and Infrastructure .......................................21 4.0 RECOMMENDATIONS ......................................22 5.0 REFERENCES ......................................25 WESA u: Page i 2008 Annual Site Monitoring and Operations Report Preliminary Draft West Elgin Landfill Site For Discussion Purposes Only LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Groundwater Elevation Data Table 2: Methane Vapour Data Table 3: Groundwater Geochemistry Data - General and Elemental Metals Scan Table 4: Groundwater Geochemistry Data - Volatile Organic Compound Data LIST OF FIGURES Figure'l: Site Location Map Figure 2: Site Plan Figure 3: Location of Cross Sections Figure 4: Cross Section AW Figure 5: Cross Section B-B' Figure 6: Groundwater Elevations and Flow Directions May 2007 Figure 7: Groundwater Elevations and Flow Directions November 2007 Figure 8: Groundwater Chemistry May 2007 Figure 9: Groundwater Chemistry November 2007 Figure 10: Final Contours Figure 11: Revised Landfill Layout LIST OF APPENDICES (Not Included In Draft Report) Appendix A: Borehole Logs Appendix B: Laboratory Reports of Groundwater Chemical Analyses Appendix C: Certificate of Approval Appendix D: Landfill Inspection Forms (Spring and Fall 2008) WESA Page H 2008 Annual Site Monitoring and Operations Report Preliminary Draft West Elgin Landfill Site For Discussion Purposes Only 1.0 INTRODUCTION WESA Inc. (WESA) was retained by The Corporation of the Municipality of West Elgin (Municipality of West Elgin) to complete the 2008 annual site monitoring and operations for the West Elgin Landfill site (the site) located near Rodney, Ontario. The monitoring program consisted of semi-annual (spring and fall) monitoring of the site groundwater quality. The Municipality of West Elgin currently operates the West Elgin Landfill site under the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) Amended Provisional Certificate of Approval (C of A) for Waste Disposal Site No. A051101 (dated December 21, 2005). This annual report summarizes the results of the 2008 environmental monitoring program, site operations for 2008 as well as comments from the MOE (letter dated December 3, 2008) on the 2007 Annual Site Monitoring and Operations Report for the site. A site location map is provided as Figure 1. 1.1 BACKGROUND WESA was retained by the Municipality in 2006 to prepare an environmental monitoring and design/operational plans for the West Elgin landfill (WESA, 2006a). The work components were completed to fulfill the requirements of the Amendment to the Provisional Certificate of Approval (C of A) provided to the Municipality by the MOE (MOE, 2005). In response to recommendations provided by WESA in the Hydrogeological Investigation and Design and Operations Report (WESA, 2006a) and to the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) in their comments on the report (MOE, 2007), WESA was retained by the Municipality to complete a subsurface investigation and leachate delineation study for the West Elgin Landfill (WESA, 2007). The subsurface investigation and leachate delineation study allowed for delineation of leachate impacts down gradient of the landfill. The study concluded that towards the east the impacts are limited to just beyond the property boundary but are not a concern due to aggregate operations and the wetland. To the south east and south impacts are limited to within <20 m of the property line. Impacts towards the south east are less of a concern due to the wetland but are a concern to the south. `i WESA Page 2008 Annual Site Monitoring and Operations Report Preliminary Draft West Elgin Landfill Site For Discussion Purposes Only The impacts to the south west are localized effect of metal storage on site and can be mitigated over time with the implementation of proper operation procedures. To fulfill the requirements of the Reasonable Use Guideline (RUL) (B-7) and the contaminant attenuation zone (CAZ), the Municipality has two recommended options; purchase surrounding property, or, 2- purchase the water rights and obtain land access agreements for the surrounding properties. Based on the conclusions of the study a 30 meter buffer to the south east and a 50 meter buffer to the south have been proposed. The recommended extent of the CAZ satisfies the current MOE requirements and allows for some additional buffer room, if required. At this time no action is needed towards the south west. The Municipality is continuing to assess the results of the investigation and are considering their options at this time. In addition, it was strongly encouraged that the design and operations recommendations made by WESA as part of the Hydrogeological Investigation and Design and Operations Report (WESA, 2006a) be implemented to minimize any additional leachate impacts and the potential need for an extension of the CAZ in the future. 1.2 LIMITING CONDITIONS The conclusions presented in this report represent our professional opinion, in light of the terms of reference, scope of work and any limiting conditions noted herein. All work is limited to the areas identified in the report. WESA cannot make any conclusions beyond these limits. The information and opinions expressed in this report is prepared for the sole benefit of Municipality of West Elgin and the MOE. No other party may use or rely upon this report or any portion thereof without the express written consent of WESA. i i WESA % 11,:T'. I"'..•, u:.m h., 6:nm„` Page 2 2008 Annual Site Monitoring and Operations Report Preliminary Draft West Elgin Landfill Site For Discussion Purposes Only 1.3 SITE SENSITIVITY AND COMPARISON CRITERIA The MOE Reasonable Use Guideline B7 (MOEE, 1994) was established by the MOE to determine the reasonable use of groundwater on properties adjacent to sources of contaminants (such as a waste disposal site). The guideline allows the determination of acceptable levels of various contaminants that may potentially migrate from a waste disposal site. The limits are calculated considering the natural background quality of groundwater existing and potential reasonable uses of groundwater in the area. The Reasonable Use Limits (RUL) were calculated based on the 2007 results for the site groundwater and Ontario Drinking Water Standard, Objectives and Guidelines (ODWS) (MOE, 2006) and will be used to asses the landfill impacts at this site. Analytical results are compared to RUL and/or ODWS and/or background conditions where no RUL has been established. 2.0 2008 ENVIRONMENTAL MONTORING PROGRAM The methods and results of the 2008 environmental monitoring program (spring and fall) are presented below. 2.1 METHODOLOGY 2.1.1 Groundwater Monitoring Program The groundwater monitoring programs were conducted on May 121h (spring) and October 1611 and September 1611 (fall), 2008. Water levels were obtained from each monitoring wells to calculate groundwater elevations and flow directions. Locations of the monitoring wells are detailed in Figure 2. All borehole logs/ monitoring well construction logs are provided in Appendix A. WESA Page 3 2008 Annual Site Monitoring and Operations Report Preliminary Draft West Elgin Landfill Site For Discussion Purposes Only Samples collected were analysed for a series of inorganic parameters (including metals and chloride) and volatile organic compounds (VOCs). The list of parameters includes, but is not limited to, the leachate indicator parameters previously established (VESA, 2006a). The list of leachate indicator parameters includes dissolved organic carbon (DOC) as requested by the MOE in their letter dated December 3, 2008. All parameters were analyzed to confirm the appropriate indicators. All monitoring wells were developed prior to sampling by purging a minimum of three well volumes or until the well was dry three times. The wells were then sampled using dedicated Waterra inertial lift foot valves and polyethylene tubing Clean, disposable nitrile gloves were worn when sampling. Inorganic parameter and metal samples were collected in sealed, laboratory provided bottles. Depending on the parameters analyzed, the appropriate preservative was placed in the bottle by the lab. Care was taken in the field to limit cross contamination of preservative and loss of preservative during sampling. In addition, metal samples were field filtered using a 0.45 µm filter. VOC samples were collected in three, 40ml- clear glass vials with Teflon septa. All samples were stored at approximately 40C during shipment to the laboratory. Chain of Custody forms accompanied the samples from the field to the laboratory and until chemical results were presented to WESA. All groundwater samples were submitted to ALS Laboratories (ALS) of Waterloo, Ontario. A full list of parameters analyzed is provided in Table 3 and 4 and full analytical results are provided in Appendix A. 2.1.2 Methane Vapour Monitoring Methane concentrations were measured in the both sampling events in 2008, at all groundwater monitoring locations at the same time as the groundwater elevation measurements using a portable Eagle@ combustible gas monitor calibrated for methane with a Multi-gas methane sensor. Methane readings in parts per million methane, % LEL of Lower Explosive Limit) and % methane were measured within the riser pipe at each location. WESA Ek I rn rr<.rrnrm I Page 4 2008 Annual Site Monitoring and Operations Report Preliminary Draft West Elgin Landfill Site For Discussion Purposes Only 2.2 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The results of the 2008 monitoring program are presented below. The 2008 results are compared with historical data, established targets or Provincial guidelines where appropriate. 2.2.1 Site Geology The surficial geology in the area of the site is classified into three units. The upper unit is a lacustrine deep water deposit consisting of sand, silt and clay till. These are underlain by lacustrine shallow water deposits consisting of gravel and sand. The gravel and sand unit in the area overlies a well laminated to massive clayey silt till. Drift thickness of the gravel and sand units are upwards of 10 m in the area (P.Map, 1973). Observations during the test drilling program (excluding the boreholes completed in the landfill material) (WESA, 2006a) identified an overlying till unit present across the area. A gravel/sand, gravel or sand unit that was up to 2.5 m thick was beneath the till and overlying a clay unit. In places throughout the landfill, some or all the units overlying the clay had been removed and replaced with landfill material. Borehoies were not advanced more than 2 m into the clay and therefore the full depth of the clay is not known. Based on MOE wells records for the area the clay extends to the top of bedrock that is approximately 90 m below ground surface (bgs). The distribution of units can be seen in two cross sections that were constructed north- south and east - west across the site. The location of the cross sections is outlined in Figure 3 the cross sections are included as Figures 4 and 5. The additional off site investigation confirms the geology in the area (WESA, 2007). The bedrock geology in the subject area is described as an inter-bedded limestone and shale with fossilliferous zones. Bedrock in the area is part of the Dundee formation and is Middle Devonian in age (P.2544). WESA %IL,u, Imiu run:vf b" Page 5 2008 Annual Site Monitoring and Operations Report Preliminary Draft West Elgin Landfill Site For Discussion Purposes Only 2.2.2 Hydrogeology Historical hydrogeological information for the area suggests that the direction of regional groundwater flow is generally from the northwest to the southeast towards Lake Erie (Chapman, 1984). Shallow groundwater flow on site has been characterized by wells completed within the landfill material or the native sand and gravel units (with the exception of MW2D). Monitoring well MW2D is completed within the clay layer that underlies the landfill and is therefore not part of the shallow groundwater flow. Based on the historical site operations as a former sand and gravel pit, it was determined during the initial hydrogeological investigation on site where areas of native sand and gravel remained. These areas were identified along the property boundaries as preferential pathway for leachate migration (WESA, 2006). The areas were confirmed in 2007 to continue off site MESA, 2007). The results of the initial hydrogeological investigation (WESA, 2006a) concluded that the hydraulic conductivity of the sand and gravel unit (1.0 x 10-3 m/s) is two orders of magnitude higher than that of the landfill material (1.5 x 10.5 m/s) tested and therefore could act as a preferential pathway for leachate impacted groundwater to migrate off site. The clay that is present around the area has a measured hydraulic conductivity (1.0 x 10-8 m/s) that is two to three orders of magnitude less than the overlaying units and therefore will help to restrict water and leachate movement. S rin 2008 Static groundwater elevation data collected on May 12th, 2008 for the monitoring well network is summarized in Table 1. The groundwater within the shallow flow ranges between 95.26 and 96.5 meters below ground surface (m bgs). Groundwater flow on site is generally towards the east. There is a mound (an area where water levels are elevated above the immediate surrounding area) in the groundwater table located along the western property boundary between MW5 and MWl. WESA 1: 1 - Page 6 2008 Annual Site Monitoring and Operations Report Preliminary Draft West Elgin Landfill Site For Discussion Purposes Only The mound causes a component of the groundwater flow in the south western corner of the site to flow towards the south (away from MW5 towards MW10). Due to the mounding effects there is the potential for a small component of flow to be directed towards MWI (the background well). In the spring 2008 the horizontal gradient between MW5 and MWI was negligible and therefore there is no component of groundwater flow from MW5 towards MWI due to the mounding. In addition, no leachate indicator parameters above the RUL were noted in MWI during the spring. The groundwater quality of MWI will continue to be monitored for any leachate impacts. If impacts are noted additional wells maybe required and the background groundwater quality monitoring location reassessed. Flow along the south western property boundary (MW5) is towards the landfill. A groundwater elevation map indicating the groundwater flow patterns on site is shown in Figure 6. Vertical flow between the landfill material, measured in MW2 and clay unit, measured in MW2D was downward at a gradient of 0.15. Fall 2008 Static groundwater elevation data collected on September 161h, 2008 is summarized in Table 1. The groundwater within the shallow flow ranges between 94.97 and 95.86 meters below ground surface (m bgs) in September 2008. A groundwater elevation map indicating the groundwater flow patterns on site is shown in Figure 7. Groundwater flow on site is generally towards the east. Similarly to the spring event, there is a mound (an area where water levels are elevated above the immediate surrounding area) in the groundwater table located along the western property boundary between MW5 and MWL The mound causes a component of the groundwater flow in the south western corner of the site to flow towards the south (away from MW5 towards MW10). The high in the groundwater flow is located in MW5, completed in the native material in the southern portion of the site and the low is in MWII located just off site to the north east. A horizontal gradient is present across the landfill towards the south east. These results are consistent with historical observations (WESA, 2006b). WESA ~ Page 7 2008 Annual Site Monitoring and Operations Report Preliminary Draft West Elgin Landfill Site For Discussion Purposes Only The horizontal gradients between MWI and MW5 due to the mounding effects in the vicinity of MW5 were negligible and consistent with the conditions observed in the spring of 2008. No leachate indicator parameters exceeded the RUL in MWI. MWI will continue to be used to assess background groundwater quality on site. The use of MWI may be re assessed if leachate impacts are observed at this location. Vertical flow between the landfill material, measured in MW2 and clay unit, measured in MW2D is downward at a gradient of 0.32, slightly higher than historical calculations. 2.2,3 Vapour Concentrations Methane vapour survey results from each monitoring location are presented in Table 2. Methane concentrations were measured at X100 % LEL in MW5, 850 ppm in MW2 and 7 % LEL in MW2D during the spring sampling event. The concentrations in the remainder of the wells were below 50 ppm. Methane concentrations were measured at X100 % LEL in MW5 with a 4% by volume methane concentration, 30 ppm in MW2 and 4 % LEL in MW2D during the fall sampling event. The concentrations in the remainder of the wells were below 25 ppm. The high methane readings were noted in wells located within or below landfill material (MW2 and MW2D) or in close proximity to historical and/or current land filling operations (MW5). 2.2.4 Groundwater Quality The results of the groundwater quality analyses are presented and discussed below. Results are discussed based on background groundwater chemistry, leachate characterization and groundwater quality. The groundwater chemistry is summarized in Tables 3 and 4 and in Figures 8 and 9 of this report. Analytical results are compared to RUL and/or ODWS and/or background conditions where no RUL has been established. Complete analytical results are presented in the original laboratory certificates of analyses provided in Appendix B. WESA uk::n Imun:aurm?-I i%t..u:.- Page 8 2008 Annual Site Monitoring and Operations Report Preliminary Draft West Elgin Landfill Site For Discussion Purposes Only 2.2.4.1 Background Groundwater Chemistry and Reasonable Use Calculations Based on the results of the on site hydrogeological investigations, it was shown that the quality of groundwater from the groundwater monitoring well MW1 is representative of background chemistry. The well is located approximately 20 m up gradient in the north western corner of the site (Figure 2). The groundwater quality at the site was compared to calculated RUL based on the background conditions on site, as measured in MWl and the ODWS. Calculated RUL values and ODWS are listed in Table 3. The concentrations of parameters that exceed the RUL and/or background are highlighted in Table 3. VOC concentrations were compared to the ODWS and exceedences are highlighted in Table 4. Background well MWl is well removed from the affects of the landfill yet has shown exceedences of RUL for several parameters including hardness, TDS (total dissolved solids), iron and manganese. These parameters often exceed ODWS in groundwater supplies in south-western Ontario and may be attributed to natural variations in groundwater quality. Therefore these parameters may not be suitable leachate indicator parameters for this site but will be considered in conjunction with other leachate indicator parameters in the assessment of leachate impact. The parameter concentrations at MWl will continue to be monitored closely in subsequent monitoring programs to verify that it is still representative of background conditions. 2.2.4.2 Leachate Indicator Parameters Upon review of the historical groundwater quality at the background location (MW1) and that of the landfill (MW2), leachate on site has been characterized by high concentrations of: • Ammonia, alkalinity, arsenic, chloride, DOC (dissolved organic carbon), iron and sodium WE SA IIl'l1 ~r, l111~ lr1151, n... Page 9 2008 Annual Site Monitoring and Operations Report Preliminary Draft West Elgin Landfill Site For Discussion Purposes Only The seven parameters as outlined above, have historically defined the leachate indicator parameters for the site (WESA, 2006a and b). In 2007, the additional investigations and the historical analytical results were reviewed and the list of leachate indicator parameters re-assessed. The off site groundwater quality, the natural features located off site (wetlands) and the surrounding properties' current and historical operations were used in this review. Based on this information DOC and iron are not believed to be solely representative of leachate impacts originating from the landfill and therefore were removed from the definitive leachate indicator parameters and were not used to delineate leachate impacts off site. However, as requested by the MOE in their letter dated December 2008, DOC has been added to the leachate impact parameter list in the 2008 analysis. The landfill is positioned within a series of wetlands (northwest property boundary) and provincially significant wetlands (east property boundary). As a result of the wetlands in close proximity to the landfill and the groundwater monitoring wells, the DOC reported in the wells could be attributed to secondary sources and not just from leachate. In addition, deforestation activates have occurred on the property adjacent to the south western property boundary (MW9). Deforestation could also attribute elevated DOC within the groundwater (MW9). Further evaluation of DOC concentrations are required to determine if DOC is in fact indicative of leachate impacts at this landfill. Iron concentrations are variable across the site. Higher concentrations have been noted in down gradient wells (MW3, M\V, 10 and MW11) than in wells completed with in the landfill material (MW2) and wells with known leachate impacts (MW6 and MW7). Given this trend iron concentrations can not be fully attributed to landfill activities but maybe signs of localized impacts due to metal storage on site. On its own iron is not representative of leachate impacts but in conjunction with other parameters, such as chloride it can be an indicator for leachate impacts. Organic Nitrogen concentrations are often used to assess the impacts of leachate and are often preferred over just using ammonia concentrations for groundwater. The concentration of Organic Nitrogen is based on a calculation using the concentrations of ammonia and TKN reported in a sample. Organic Nitrogen will be used in conjunction with ammonia to assess leachate impacts. ~6 WESA M, t.,„„..,,,,,.,„ Page 10 2008 Annual Site Monitoring and Operations Report Preliminary Draft West Elgin Landfill Site _ For Discussion Purposes Only Based on the information presented above, a revised list of leachate indicator parameters has been prepared. The revised parameter list is believed to be representative of leachate impacts associated with the site are to be used to delineate the leachate impacts on and off site. • Ammonia, alkalinity, arsenic, chloride, DOC, iron, organic N, and sodium The leachate indicator parameters are used to assess the quality of groundwater and will be used to monitor changes in groundwater chemistry at each sampling location. It should be noted that although certain parameters (i.e. iron) are leachate indicator parameters for the site, they often occur naturally (i.e. at non-impacted wells) at concentrations above RUL and/or ODWS. Therefore, concentrations of leachate indicator parameters are compared to background concentrations to assess leachate impact. Upon comparison of the groundwater chemistry at one or more monitoring locations on site to calculated RULs, ODWS and background conditions several parameters exceed the set value. Although exceedences were noted, the parameters are not considered leachate indicator parameters for this site. The parameters include colour, hardness, TDS, fluoride, sulphate, boron, and manganese. As discussed in the 2007 Annual Report (WESA, 2007), the natural occurrence of these parameters and the concentrations of these parameters in the background well indicate that these parameters are not indicative of leachate impact. It is recognized that chloride represents the most mobile of the contaminant indicator parameters encountered and would be expected to be the first contaminant indicator parameter to reach a monitoring location if leachate migration was occurring. Concentrations of chloride will be monitored closely to evaluate the migration of leachate impacts off site. 2.2.4.3 Site Groundwater Quality Spring 2008 The groundwater quality within the shallow flow and the clay unit are presented in Table 3 with RUL and the background groundwater quality established for the site. The parameters that exceeded the RUL and/or background have been highlighted. ~-i WESA t fG^,~rr t nnioanir11 1-4 Ikianr.. Page 11 2008 Annual Site Monitoring and Operations Report Preliminary Draft West Elgin Landfill Site For Discussion Purposes Only Table 4 presents the VOC data and the VOC parameter levels that exceeded ODWS have been highlighted. Groundwater chemistry results showing leachate indicator parameters that exceed the RUL can also be seen in Figures 8. The following table summarizes all parameters measured in excess of the RUL and the location of the monitoring well for the May 2008 sampling event: Summaryof RUL Exceedances Well Location Monitoring Well Groundwater Flow Leachate Parameters RUL Exceedences Background MW1 Shallow - Leachate MW2 Shallow Chloride, Alkalinity, Iron, and DOC East MW3 Shallow Alkalinity, Arsenic, Iron, and DOC Southeast MW4 Shallow Alkalinity and DOC Southwest MW5 Shallow Alkalinity, Iron, and DOC Off Site M\V, 6 Shallow Chloride, Alkalinity, Iron, and DOC East MW7 Shallow Chloride, Alkalinity, and DOC Off Site MW8 Shallow Alkalinity and DOC Off Site MW9 Shallow - Off Site MW10 Shallow - Off Site MWI1 Shallow Chloride, Alkalinity, Sodium, and DOC Off Site MW12 Shallow - Clay MW2D Deep DOC The concentration of ammonia was compared to background levels measured in MW1. The results were above the background levels in 12 of the 13 wells (not in MW10). Organic nitrogen was compared to both background levels measured in MW1 and the RUL. There were no instances of organic nitrogen exceeding the RUL, however it did exceed the background level in M1VJ1 in 10 of the 13 wells (not in MWl, MW4, and M\V11 WESA Page 12 2008 Annual Site Monitoring and Operations Report Preliminary Draft West Elgin Landfill Site For Discussion Purposes Only Monitoring well MW2D, located within the landfill footprint, was completed within the clay to see the effects of the landfill activates of the clay layer. The RUL was not exceeded for any leachate indicator parameters in spring 2008 except for DOC. The ammonia and organic nitrogen concentrations were reported above background concentrations. The analytical results observed during the monitoring event are consistent with those historically observed and reported on site. The results of the VOC analyses are summarized in Table 4. The results of the VOC analyses had concentrations of all parameters measured below the ODWS in spring 2008. A few parameters were detected above the laboratory detection limit and followed historical trends. Benzene has been noted in MW4 and MW5 since May 2006 and was detected again in MW4 in spring 2008. Benzene was also detected in MW3 in spring 2008 for the first time. Chlorobenzene, ethylbenzene and total xylene has also been reported in MW5 over the same time period. Toluene and total xylene were detected in MW2 in spring 2008. Concentrations of dichlorodifuoromethane (May 2006), methyl ethyl ketone (November 2006), xylenes (November 2006 and May 2007) and trichlorofluoromethane (May 2006 to May 2007) have also been reported above the laboratory detection limits. Acetone, carbon disulfide, DCE, Trans 1,2-Dichloropropene and trichorofluoromethane were detected in spring 2008. Chlorobenzene and the fluoromethanes are associated with refrigerants. These parameters will continue to be monitored to assess their impacts on the site. Fall 2008 The parameters that exceeded the RUL and/or background have been highlighted in Table 3. VOC concentrations were compared to the ODWS and exceedances highlighted in Table 4. Groundwater chemistry results that exceed the RUL for leachate indicator parameters can also be seen in Figures 9. The following table summarizes all parameters measured in excess of the RUL and the location of the monitoring well for the September 2008 sampling event: WESA Page 13 2008 Annual Site Monitoring and Operations Report Preliminary Draft West Elgin Landfill Site For Discussion Purposes Only Summary of RUL Exceedances Well Location Monitoring Well Groundwater Flow Leachate Parameters RUL Exceedences Background MWI Shallow - Leachate MW2 Shallow Alkalinity, Arsenic, Iron, and DOC East MW3 Shallow Alkalinity, Arsenic, Iron, and DOC Southeast MW4 Shallow Alkalinity, Iron, and DOC Southwest MW5 Shallow Alkalinity, Iron, and DOC Off Site MW6 Shallow Chloride, Alkalinity, Iron, and DOC East MW7 Shallow Chloride, Alkalinity, and DOC Off Site MW8 Shallow Alkalinity and DOC Off Site MW9 Shallow - Off Site MWI0 Shallow Iron Off Site M\V1 1I Shallow Chloride, Alkalinity, Sodium, and DOC Off Site MW12 Shallow - Clay MW2D Deep Iron and DOC The concentration of ammonia was compared to background levels measured in MW1. The results were above the background levels in 10 of the 13 wells (not in MWI, MW10, or MW12). Organic nitrogen was compared to both the background levels measured in MWI and the RUL. There were no instances of Organic Nitrogen exceeding the RUL, however it did exceed the background level in MWI in 8 of the 13 wells (not in MWI, MW4, MW8, MW9, and MW10). Monitoring well MW2D, located within the landfill footprint, was completed within the clay to see the effects of the landfill activates of the clay layer. The RUL was exceeded for leachate indicator parameters iron and DOC in fall 2008. The ammonia and organic nitrogen concentrations were reported above background concentrations. L 6 . WESA Page 14 2008 Annual Site Monitoring and Operations Report Preliminary Draft West Elgin Landfill Site For Discussion Purposes Only The analytical results observed during the monitoring event are consistent with those historically observed and reported on site. The results of the VOC analyses are summarized in Table 4. The results of the VOC analyses had concentrations of all parameters measured below the ODWS in fall 2008. A few parameters were detected above the laboratory detection limit but below the ODWS and followed historical trends. Benzene is noted in MW3, MW4 and MW5 in fall 2008. Benzene had been noted in MW4 and MW5 since May 2006 and in MW3 in spring 2008. Total Xylene was noted for the first time in MW4 in fall 2008 and chlorobenzene was noted in MW5 as was noted historically. Acetone and chloroform were detected in fall 2008 in MW2D. These parameters will continue to be monitored to assess their impacts on the site. 2.2.4.4 Quality Assessment and Quality Control (QA/QC) A duplicate sample was collected from MW5 while on site for QA/QC purposes in both the spring and the fall. An additional trip bank sample was collected in the fall. The analytical results indicated good correlation between samples (Table 3 and 4). 3.0 ANNUAL OPERATIONS REPORT 3.1 HISTORICAL SITE OPERATIONS The West Elgin Landfill site has been in operation since 1971. A Provisional Certificate of Approval (A051101) was first issued in 1971 and reissued in 1972, 1973, 1974, and 1976. On July 16, 1980 the MOE reissued a Provisional Certificate of Approval (C of A) to the Village of Rodney. The MOE issued an amendment to the C of A on December 21, 2005 (Appendix E). A Hydrogeologicai Investigation and Design and Operations Report was completed by WESA and submitted to the Director of the MOE for approval on September 151, 2006 (WESA, 2006). WESA Page 15 2008 Annual Site Monitoring and Operations Report Preliminary Draft West Elgin Landfill Site For Discussion Purposes Only 3.2 EXISTING CONDITIONS The West Elgin Landfill site is owned by the Municipality of West Elgin, and operated and maintained under contract from the municipality by a company operated by Mr. Sam Kirschner. The site is located on Lot B, Concession 7 former Township of Aldborough, West Elgin Municipality, County of Elgin (Figure 1). The landfill services the entire Municipality of West Elgin. The population served is approximately 5,500 which is estimated to increase to approximately 6,000 during the summer months. Adjacent land uses to the site include a low lying wood lot, wetlands and agricultural fields to the northwest, an aggregate (sand and gravel pit) to the northeast, a wood lot and low lying wetlands to the southeast, and land consisting of grasses, shrubs and trees to the southwest. General topography, surface water drainage, and the hydrogeological assessment of the site are included in Section 2 of this report. There is one access road entering the site from the northwest at Downie Line. The gate across the access road is locked whenever the landfill is closed or the attendant is not present. The site is bounded at each property boundary by natural forest and marshlands to deter illegal access to the site. A temporary access road is maintained to access the active landfill area. This road will be modified accordingly as waste disposal proceeds. There is one attendant building on-site that is constructed on grade. There are no utilities (electricity, gas, water, sanitary sewers, or phone) to the site. The site operator has a cell phone in case of emergencies. Existing signs include an entrance sign and signs denoting bins for recyclable material. As per Condition 16 of the Amended C of A, the entrance sign states the owner's name and hours of operation, the operator's name, the Provisional Certificate of Approval No., the type of waste accepted, and a contact telephone number to call with complaints or in the event of an emergency. WESA ~,Y Page 16 2008 Annual Site Monitoring and Operations Report Preliminary Draft West Elgin Landfill Site For Discussion Purposes Only Landfill operating hours are from 8am to 5pm on Wednesday and Friday, and gam to 4 pm on Saturday. From December to March the operating hours change to 10am to 5prn on Wednesday and Friday, and gam to 4 pm on Saturday. Waste disposal records are kept at the local municipal offices. The Municipality of West Elgin maintains a record of daily site operations, a record of complaints, a record of site inspections, and a record of unacceptable waste for the West Elgin Landfill as per Conditions 25 through 28 of the C of A, at the local municipal offices. During the environmental monitoring events, WESA completes a landfill inspection and maintenance record to determine if any adjustments are required for the operation of the West Elgin Landfill. The completed inspection records for Spring, Fall and Winter 2008 are included in Appendix D. 3.3 WASTE DISPOSAL The West Elgin Landfill site is currently licensed for the disposal of domestic and commercial waste. Waste surveys were conducted in February and April 2008 to identify the source of the waste and recyclable materials, and the number of bags disposed of each day. The waste survey conducted during this time period confirms the types of wastes and recyclables collected at the West Elgin Landfill and is consistent with the waste survey conducted in by the Municipality in February 2007. In May 2007, WESA conducted a one-day waste audit to provide an approximate average weight per bag of waste, as well as per car, truck, and van load accepted at the West Elgin Landfill. In addition, the number of bags of waste collected from residential versus commercial sources was counted during the survey. Based on the May 2007 waste survey, the assumed average weight per bag is 5.2 kg and the assumed number of bags per car, truck, and van is 3.3, 3.3, and 3, respectively. The measured weight for pick-up runs from the residential areas has also been used to calculate the total amount of waste coming into the landfill. WESA } &-,i, , h,, r....... Page 17 2008 Annual Site Monitoring and Operations Report Preliminary Draft West Elgin Landfill Site For Discussion Purposes Only As part of the daily records, the Municipality tracks the number of cars, trucks, and vans entering the facility to drop off waste. In addition, they also track the pick-ups from local residential communities and trailer parks. Based on the average weight per bag, per car, per truck and per van, as well as the total brought in for commercial and residential pick- ups, the total waste brought for deposit in the West Elgin Landfill in 2008 was approximately 410 tonnes. This quantity of waste does not include non-hazardous contaminated soil that was brought to the site for use as daily cover material (refer to Section 3.6). Domestic waste represents greater than an estimated 90% of the waste entering the landfill. The domestic waste was delivered by commercial hauler or individual drop-off and is typically comprised of the following: • Mixed household garbage • Plastic • Glass • Aluminum and tin cans • Scrap metal • Roof shingles • Newspapers Large items such as discarded appliances, furniture, and mattresses, are collected by the haulers or delivered to the waste disposal site for recycling, re-use or deposition at the landfill. Clean wood and brush are collected in a pile to the west of the approved waste limits and burned. Commercial waste represents less than an estimated 10% of the waste generated in the municipality. Commercial waste is delivered by commercial hauler and includes: • Paper and cardboard • Restaurant kitchen waste • Scrap metal • Plastics WESA : Page 18 2008 Annual Site Monitoring and Operations Report Preliminary Draft West Elgin Landfill Site For Discussion Purposes Only Based on the information supplied to WESA by the municipality, the West Elgin Landfill recycles a combined estimated average total of 217 tonnes of material in 2008. Although this number is an average and considers recyclables collected in both 2007 but not removed until 2008, as well as recyclables collected in 2008 and removed in 2008, this number constitutes approximately 52% of the total material the landfill received in 2008. The following is a breakdown of the recycled material received at the site, on an average annual basis (average calculated from estimated quantities of recyclables in 2004 through 2008): • Scrap metal, 95.4 tonnes Glass, 29.1 tonnes • Paper, 28.6 tonnes • Plastic, 31.6 tonnes • Aluminum and steel cans, 19.7 tonnes • Cardboard, 12.2 tonnes The estimated quantities of recyclables has been adjusted for 2004 through 2007 in the above calculation based on a re-evaluation material removed from site for those corresponding years. 3.4 FINAL CONTOURS AND SITE CAPACITY The final contours plan is shown in Figure 10. The Municipality of West Elgin has placed cement blocks to delineate the limit of the landfill in adherence to Figure 10. The final contours are based on the local topography of the site and the estimated footprint area of 1.42 hectares. All side slopes will be constructed to a maximum 250/0 grade. The crown of the landfill will be constructed to a minimum 5% grade to promote surface water runoff. In 1984, MOE staff estimated the site capacity to be 100,600 m3. Prior to this time, the site did not have an approved capacity. Based on the final contours plan included in this report, the total site capacity is 134,823 m3. MESA , i-";,.,,,.., Page 19 2008 Annual Site Monitoring and Operations Report Preliminary Draft West Elgin Landfill Site For Discussion Purposes Only Using this site capacity and based on the June 2006 contours at the site, the estimated quantity of in-place waste is 110,884 m3 (WESA,2006). Based on an estimated annual waste input rate of 410 tonnes, a compaction density of 0.5 tonne/m3 and a waste to cover ratio of 4:1, the annual air space utilization rate for the site is calculated to be 1025 m3/annum. Using the estimated quantity of in-place waste, calculated utilization rates, and a projected annual population (le., waste) growth rate of 0.5% over the next 25 years, the estimated life of the landfill is 19 years from December 2008 (that is, until December 2026). The estimated remaining site capacity as of December 2008 is 21,503 m3. Note that any estimate of remaining site life is highly sensitive to variations in waste characteristics, waste generation rates, cover material utilization, waste compaction and recycling efforts. The above projection of site life should therefore be interpreted as a rough estimate only, and should be reviewed annually against actual changes in the landfill volumes. 3.5 2008 SITE OPERATIONS The Hydrogeological Investigation and Design and Operations Report prepared by WESA (VESA, 2006) provides a detailed phased development plan for Landfill operations over the site life. In 2008, a total of 5 loads of clay were placed on the edge of the laneway as final cover, however no other final cover was placed on the landfill foot print. Interim cover is placed over the active face on a weekly basis. All locations that are not part of the active face should be covered with 300 mm of intermediate cover material as discussed in the WESA 2006 report. The municipality has placed cement blocks to visually delineate the 30 m buffer area so that the site operator can place waste to the edge of the design area without extending into the buffer area. As per Condition 18 of the Amended C of A, daily cover or suitable alternative must be placed over the entire active face at the end of every operating week. In 2008, daily soil cover is placed on the active face at the end of each operating day. ~ii WESA Page 20 2008 Annual Site Monitoring and Operations Report Preliminary Draft West Elgin Landfill Site For Discussion Purposes Only The Hydrogeological Investigation and Design and Operations Report prepared by WESA (\VESA, 2006) outlines the requirement for active face operations at the landfill. The active face should be kept to a maximum width of 10. m wide. The height of the active face should be the shorter of 1.5 m or the distance to the final waste contour. Site inspections in 2008 indicate that the active face is within the 10 m width requirement and the height is greater than the 1.5 m recommendation. Site inspection forms are provided in Appendix D. The natural surface water drainage at the site is controlled by the low topographic relief. There are no on-site drains and little evidence of surface water ponding or channels were identified during WESA's site visits. The landfill is situated on a local topographic high and therefore surface water run-on has not been a problem. According to the site operator, the site did not have concerns associated with litter, noise, dust, odour, or vectors in 2008. The May and October site inspections conducted by WESA did note some minor litter beyond the landfill footprint, however an inspection in December 2008 identified that litter had been picked up and was being picked up on a regular basis. The site currently maintains a record of complaints received about the site or any environmental emergency situations that occur at the site at the local municipal offices. There were no complaints in the log for 2008. Site inspections performed by WESA in May and October 2008 indicated that recyclable materials storage could be better contained and improved so that mixing of materials does not occur. This task was completed and the inspection performed by WESA in December 2008 indicated that excess recyclables had been removed. Bins used to collect recyclables must be kept in good condition without leaks as per Condition 24 of the Amended C of A 3.6 CHANGES TO OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES AND INFRASTRUCTURE There were no changes to operational procedures or infrastructure. ,Mj WESA Page 21 2008 Annual Site Monitoring and Operations Report Preliminary Draft West Elgin Landfill Site T For Discussion Purposes Only 4.0 RECOMMENDATIONS The recommendations derived from 2008 annual site monitoring and operations for the West Elgin Landfill site are outlined below. The recommendations for the Annual Site Monitoring and Reporting and Site Operations are consistent with those from the previous annual reports. Recommendations for the contaminant attenuation zone (CAZ) are consistent with those in the Subsurface Investigation and Leachate Delineation (WESA, 2007). Annual Site Monitoring and Reporting 1. The site groundwater monitoring network should be sampled in the spring and fall 2009 for a full set of parameters, as listed in Table 3 and 4 of this report, to establish site conditions. Subsequent monitoring should take place twice per year (spring and fall) for each of the following years. 2. By no later than April 30th, 2009, and by April 301h of every year thereafter a site operation and environmental monitoring report will be prepared and submitted to the Ministry of the Environment. This recommendation is outlined in the provisional Certificate of Approval for this site. Annual Operations Report 1. The landfill site should continue to maintain a record of daily site operations, monthly site inspections conducted by a trained person, all occurrences of receipt of unacceptable waste, and complaints received about the site or any environmental emergency situations that occur at the local municipal offices. In order for the landfill site to be in compliance with the Amended C of A, these records containing the information specified in Conditions 25 through 28 must be maintained. 2. It is recommended that the site operator and the Municipality meet on a monthly basis to provide records on waste accepted, quantities recycled, and to review the completed landfill inspections and the inspection results. 3. The site operator should continue to use the delineated landfill footprint to ensure operations adhere to the detailed phased development plan and active face operations as provided in the Hydrogeological Investigation and Design and Operations Report (WESA, 2006). WESA Page 22 2008 Annual Site Monitoring and Operations Report Preliminary Draft West Elgin Landfill Site For Discussion Purposes Only 4. Bins used to collect recyclables must be kept in good condition without leaks as per Condition 24 of the Amended C of A. 5. A layout of recycling collection bins and burn pile sorting area has been developed and is shown in Figure 11. 6. As per Condition 18 of the Amended C of A, daily cover must be placed over the entire active face with a minimum thickness of 150 mm of soil cover at the end of every operating day. As stated, a tarp can be used as an alternative and the Municipality should continue its efforts in utilizing this tarp. Final cover should be placed over the areas where the waste footprint is within the 30 m buffer area. Contaminant Attenuation Zone To fulfill the requirements of the Reasonable Use Guideline (MOE Guideline B-7) and the contaminant attenuation zone (CAZ), the Municipality has two recommended options; purchase surrounding property, or, 2- purchase the water rights and obtain land access agreements for the surrounding properties. Based on the conclusions of the leachate delineation study (WESA, 2007) a 30 m buffer to the south-southeast and a 50 m buffer to the south have been proposed. The recommended extent of the CAZ satisfies the current MOE requirements and allows for some additional buffer room if required. At this time no action is needed towards the southwest (MW10). The Municipality is exploring there options at this time and will await comment from the MOE before proceeding. WESA Page 23 01 West Elgin Chamber of Commerce P.O. Box 276, Rodney, ON. NOL 2C0 April 13, 2009 t c svco sr¢ Mayor and Council ~1 29 The Municipality of West Elgin 22413 Hoskins Line PO Box 490 Rodney, Ontario. NOL 2C0 Rc: Proposed Modification to Draft Official Plan for The Municipality of West Elgin At its April general meeting the West Elgin Chamber of Commerce had the opportunity to discuss the proposed modification indicated above. The Chamber asked its' executive members to review the modification in more detail and respond on behalf of the group. After due consideration, the Executive feels that there are no substantive issues with the proposed modification and wishes to express its' recognition of the importance of encouraging the proposed development at Port Glasgow. The Executive is of the opinion that a well-planned and carefully executed development at the intended location holds much promise for the economic viability of the entire community. This is an opportunity that the community cannot afford to miss. Please make every effort to adapt the Draft Official Plan to accommodate the proposed development. Yours truly, Keith Fretter Vice-President West Elgin Chamber of Commerce Tel. 519-785-0916 Email: keith@theirispatch.ca D aj West Elgin Chamber of Commerce P.4. Box 276, Rodney, ON. NOL 2C0 April 9, 2009 Mayor and Council The Municipality of West Elgin 22413 Hoskins Line PO Box 490 Rodney, Ontario. NOL 2C0 REC01VEI) V e ki Ai I ~ 2909 Re: Draft Community Improvement Plan The West Elgin Chamber of Commerce would like to go on record as being strongly in support of the general direction of the draft plan noted above. Individual members have been urged to attend the Public Meeting planned for April 30, 2009 and the Chamber executive will have members in attendance. It was the consensus of members present at our April 7 meeting that it would be logical to start with the creation of a Business Improvement Area and the association of businesses that this implies. From that point forward, the Association should be involved with the implementation and possible modification of the rest of the plan. Maintaining strong connections between the association that would be formed under the proposed plan and the Chamber of Commerce would also be vital to the success of the venture. Given that the Chamber's meetings are typically held within the area that is encompassed by the BIA, perhaps there could be mutual membership of each organization by the other. It also makes sense, when attempting to build a new entity and achieve `buy-in' from potential members, to consider more creative ways of funding the organization in the formative first two years. We look forward to early adoption of the Community Improvement Plan and the opportunity to get to work on driving more business to the area. Yours truly, 00 Keith Fretter Vice President West Elgin Chamber of Commerce Tel. 519-785-0916 Email: keith@theirispatch.ca Canad Dear Head of Council, ankirVrCiPaIITY OF NEST OWN n 2009 Ontario The current economic crisis is of great concern to all Canadians. Both the Government of Canada and the Government of Ontario have undertaken and are committed to making significant investments to help communities weather this economic storm and get much needed stimulus money into the economy. Through the recent federal and provincial budgets, our governments have recognized that improving Ontario's infrastructure backbone will also help boost the economy, create jobs and will improve the daily quality of life in communities across the province. We want to take this opportunity to tell you about a new way for you to have your municipality's short-term priority infrastructure projects that can be built within two years identified for funding consideration. As many of you know, we recently announced 290 projects in Ontario valued at over one billion dollars under the Communities Component of Building Canada. The Government of Ontario and the Government of Canada remain committed to working together to continue to build modern public infrastructure in our municipalities across Ontario. In its Budget 2009, the federal government announced a Communities Component Top-Up of $500 million available to municipalities for projects that could be started and completed by March 31, 2011. The Government of Ontario has set aside matching funds for Ontario's portion of the Top-up funding in its recent provincial budget. We are launching a new intake for applications for the remaining funding and for the Top-up Funds available under the Communities Component of Building Canada for municipalities of under 100,000 people. The Government of Canada has also announced the creation of a new $4-billion Infrastructure Stimulus Fund, aimed at getting shovels in the ground for infrastructure projects that can be completed over the next two years. The Government of Ontario will match this federal funding and work together with the Government of Canada to ensure that these funds are delivered expeditiously and efficiently to municipalities in the province. These funds are focused on the rehabilitation of existing assets, but new construction is eligible, D3 provided it can be fully completed by March 31, 2011, and it represents an incremental investment on the part of the municipality. The Infrastructure Stimulus Fund works by having the federal and provincial governments match municipal contributions towards infrastructure projects on an equal basis. All parties share one-third of the total eligible project cost. This funding will help create jobs and provide much-needed stimulus to the economy. It will also help municipal governments meet their varied and growing infrastructure needs. Proponents will be required to attest that the projects would not have been built over the next two construction seasons without the federal and provincial funding. A program guide and a very short application form can be accessed at: www.bcfontario.ca. Your municipality can complete applications for up to three economic stimulus projects. You can also access application forms for the Communities Component of the Building Canada Fund through this web site. Municipalities are encouraged to contact the Canada-Ontario Infrastructure Secretariat at 1-866-306-7827 to get a username and password to access the on-line application form. All applications are due on May 1, 2009. Successful proponents will be notified quickly so that construction may begin. Financial agreements will be signed between the Province of Ontario and municipalities. Prior to final approval of your funding and the conclusion of an agreement with the Province, the Municipality must provide proof of Council support for the approved project and the municipal contribution. We hope that you share our enthusiasm for this significant new funding and our new streamlined application process. We believe that it will make our decision-making process more efficient and get this much-needed infrastructure money flowing faster. We look forward to learning more about your municipality's infrastructure priorities. We value our collaboration with municipal governments in ensuring Ontario's infrastructure needs are met. Sincerely, L9L~ 4&11~ -0 John Baird, P.C., M.P. Canada's Minister of Transport, Infrastructure and Communities George Smitherman, M.P.P. Ontario's Deputy Premier and Minister of Energy and Infrastructure 519 637 3358 Joe Preston MP Ottawa Confederation Bldg, Room 142 Ottawa, ON K1A OA6 Tal: (613) 990-7769 Pax: (613) 996-0194 www.joeprestonmp.ca f®e. Prestos NP Eggin glfidAesex-London To The Mayor, Members of Council and. Administration' 09:56:25 a.m_ 04-15-2009 214 D~ Constituency 24 First Avenue, Unit 2 St. Thomas, ON NSR 4M5 Tel: (519) 637-2255 Pax: (519) 637-3358 Toll Free: 1-866-404-0406 We are launching ,a new intake for applications for the remaining funding and for the Top-up Funds available under the Communities Component of Building Canada for municipalities of under 100,000 people. Proponents will be required to attest that the projects would not have been built over the next two construction seasons without the federal and provincial funding. A program guide and a very short application form can be accessed at- www.bcfontario.ca..Your municipaIity.can complete applications for up to three economic stimulus projects. You can also access application forms for the Communities Component of the Building Canada Fund through this web site. Municipalities are encouraged to contact the Canada-Ontario Infrastructure Secretariat at 1-866-306-7827 to get a username and password to access the on-lime application form. All applications are due on May 1, 2009. Successful proponents will be notified quickly so that construction may begin. Financial agreements will be signed between the Province of Ontario and municipalities. Prior to final approval of your funding and the conclusion of an agreement with the Province, the Municipality must provide proof of Council support for the approved project and the municipal contribution. We hope that you share our enthusiasm for this significant new funding and our new streamlined application process. We believe that it will make our decision-making process more efficient and get this much-needed infrastructure money flowing faster.. Although our office has received a list of priority projects from your community we want to remind you that a formal application is necessary and request that you advise our office of the projects that you are applying for. Preston Member of Parliament Elgin-Middlesex-London 519 637 3358 Joe Preston MP 09:56:41 a.rn _ 04-15-2009 314 17U"L4j11g l.iu14 UiA - %_.U1111AAU1uUUcJ L, V111~.JVU.G1l11 ra6u A UL I ® A~ Infrastructure i ci,i66 il* Canada Home a Media Centre - News Releases Communities Component New in Canada's Economic Action Plan Through Canada's Economic Action Plan; the federal government will top up the Building Canada Fund's Communities Component to accelerate infrastructure projects in small communities. An additional $500 million has been committed over the next two years, which will be allocated to projects that are ready to get started, and will be completed, In the next two construction seasons. About the Program The Communities Component of the Building Canada Fund recognizes that smaller communities have unique infrastructure needs, and therefore targets projects In communities with populations of less than 100,000. Projects are selected through an application-based process. Projects are cost-shared on a one-third basis among federal, provincial and municipal counterparts. Projects related to safe drinking water, disaster mitigation, brownfield redevelopment, and local roads and bridges are funded through the Communities Component. How it Works Municipalities will be able to participate in-the applications-based programs that are managed to best fit circumstances in each province. Application intakes will take place in each province and those intakes will be communicated to municipalities. Projects will be eligible under the existing seventeen categories of the Communities Component. Through the extra $500 million, work funded must be completed within two years. Furthermore, the existing Communities Component allocation for a province must be committed to projects before municipalities in that province can access the $500 million top-up. Who is Eligible? Canadian municipalities with a population of less than 100,000, as determined by the Statistics Canada's Final 2006 Census, are eligible to apply for funding under the Communities Component. A private sector body or non-profit organization whose application is supported by a Council resolution from the local municipality could also apply. March 26, 2009 Date Modified: 2009-04-09 http:l/www.buildingeanada-chantierscanada. ge. calmedialnews-nouvellesl2009/cc-vc-eng.... 15/04/2009 51 B 637 3358 Joe Preston MP 09:56:59 a_m. 04-15-2009 4 14 our-untarlo: t-,On]1]]11nnies rage I of 1 FRANr,Ais i HOME I CONTACT US I PARTNERS I CANADA.CA I ONTARIO.CA Home > Communities 7 Intoke 2 About Us Intake 2 News Intake Two of the Communities Component Is open for business - Apply Now! Communities ISF Application: Applications can be submitted online Contact (Is For login Information, please call the Joint Secretariat at 1-666-306-7827. Deadline: Applications must be received no later than 5:00p.m. EST an May 1, 2009 Migible project categolkles: Under Intake Two there are 18 project categories. To be deemed eligible a project must fall under one of these categories. Each eligible application is evaluated against how It meets the relevant project category's specific objectives, mandatory screening criteria, and project benefits. The project must also be directly related to one of Its sub-categories. • Brownfield Redevelopment. • Collaborative Projects • Connectivity And Broadband • Core National Highway System • Culture o Disaster Mitigation • Drinking Water • Green Energy • Local And Regional Airports • Local Roads • Public Transit • Recreation *NOW, • Shortline Railways • short-Sea Shipping • Solid Waste Management • sport • Tourism • Wastewater Infrastructure Selection Process: Once assessed, applications are reviewed by a joint federal-provincial oversight Committee that forwards recommendations for funding to senior governments for approval. Online Guide Application- FAQs Agreement http://www.bcfontario.ca/english/communities/Intake2/index.html 15/04/2009 4-1 ntario Canada