12 - June 23, 2026 Committee of the Whole Agenda Package110c,
ElginCounty
Elgin County Council
Committee of the Whole Meeting
Orders of the Day
Tuesday, June 23, 2026, 10:30 a.m.
Council Chambers
450 Sunset Drive
St. Thomas ON
Note for Members of the Public:
Please click the link below to watch the meeting livestream:
https://video.isilive.ca/elgincounty/live.html
Accessible formats available upon request.
Pages
1.
Meeting Call to Order
2.
Approval of Agenda
3.
Adoption of Minutes
2
4.
Disclosure of Pecuniary Interest and the General Nature Thereof
5.
Members' Motions
6.
Reports of Council, Staff or Outside Boards
6.1 Policy Planner - PLN 26-10 Hospital Expansion Lands Official Plan
6
Amendment No. CE OPA-01-26
6.2 Director of People and Culture - PAC 26-04 Non -Union Job Evaluation
14
and Market Comparators
6.3 Director of Engineering Services - ENG 26-16 County Asset Transfers
19
7.
Adjournment
Elgin County Council
Committee of the Whole Meeting
Minutes
June 9, 2026, 9:30 a.m.
Council Chambers
450 Sunset Drive
St. Thomas ON
Members Present: Warden Dominique Giguere
Deputy Warden Grant Jones
Councillor Ed Ketchabaw
Councillor Mark Widner
Councillor Jack Couckuyt
Councillor Andrew Sloan
Councillor Todd Noble
Councillor Mike Hentz
Councillor Richard Leatham
Staff Present: Blaine Parkin, Chief Administrative Officer
Nicholas Loeb, Director of Legal Services
Brian Masschaele, Director of Community & Cultural Services
Jennifer Ford, Director of Financial Services/Treasurer
Peter Dutchak, Director of Engineering Services
Mat Vaughan, Director of Planning and Development
Joe Anne Holloway, Director of Homes and Seniors Services
Katherine Thompson, County Clerk/Manager of Administrative
Services
Carolyn Krahn, Manager of Economic Development, Tourism &
Strategic Initiatives
Diana Morris, Senior Planner
Stefanie Heide, Executive Performance Coordinator
Meeting Call to Order
The meeting was called to order at 11:33 a.m. with Warden Giguere in the chair.
2. Approval of Agenda
Resolution Number: CW26-58
Moved by: Councillor Noble
Seconded by: Deputy Warden Jones
RESOLVED THAT the agenda for the June 9, 2026 Committee of the Whole
Meeting be approved as presented.
Motion Carried.
3. Adoption of Minutes
Resolution Number: CW26-59
Moved by: Councillor Leatham
Seconded by: Councillor Hentz
RESOLVED THAT the minutes of the meeting held on May 26, 2026 be adopted.
Page 2 of 25
Motion Carried.
4. Disclosure of Pecuniary Interest and the General Nature Thereof
None.
5. Members' Motions
None.
6. Reports of Council, Staff or Outside Boards
6.1 Director of Community and Cultural Services - CCS 26-06 Elgin St.
Thomas Age Friendly Strategy: 2026 Update
Wendy MacMillan and Meagan Lichti, Co -Chairs of the Elgin St. Thomas
Age Friendly Committee, provided a presentation detailing the
Committee's 2026 updated strategy.
The Director of Community and Cultural Services provided a report that
highlights some of the current activities of Elgin County that support the
age friendly community and provides additional initiatives where Council
can play a leading role in improving the life of older adults in Elgin County
Following the presentation, Warden Giguere presented Wendy MacMillan
with the Ministry of Seniors and Accessibility's 2026 Senior of the Year
Award.
Resolution Number: CW26-60
Moved by: Councillor Couckuyt
Seconded by: Councillor Noble
RESOLVED THAT the delegation from the Elgin St. Thomas Age Friendly
Committee and related document "Elgin St. Thomas Age Friendly
Strategy: 2026 Update" as presented at the June 9, 2026 meeting be
received and filed, and;
THAT the "Elgin St. Thomas Age Friendly Strategy: 2026 Update" be
utilized as a planning resource for the provision of services provided by
the County of Elgin, and;
THAT Elgin County Council hereby affirms its commitment to maintaining
the County of Elgin's status as an age friendly community, and;
THAT an annual contribution of $2,000 to support the activities of the Elgin
St. Thomas Age Friendly Committee be referred to 2027 budget
deliberations.
Motion Carried.
6.2 Senior Planner - PLN-26-07 Draft Plan of Subdivision 34T-SO2502
9210 Union Road (Township of Southwold)
The Senior Planner presented the report that provides County Council
with information required to consider granting approval to the draft plan of
subdivision, file 34T-SO2502, located at 9210 Union Road in the
Township of Southwold.
Resolution Number: CW26-61
Moved by: Councillor Noble
Seconded by: Councillor Leatham
RESOLVED THAT the Council of the Corporation of the County of Elgin
grants draft plan approval to Draft Plan of Subdivision 34T-SO2502,
Township of Southwold, 9210 Union Road, certified by Thomas J. Stirling
Page 3 of 25
O.L.S on behalf of Domus Developments Inc., dated November 6, 2025;
and
THAT staff be directed to provide notice of decision subject to the
conditions of final approval in accordance with the requirements of the
Planning Act.
Motion Carried.
6.3 Senior Planner - PLN-26-08- Draft Plan of Subdivision 34T-SO2503
10141 Talbotville Gore Road (Township of Southwold)
The Senior Planner presented the report that provides Council with the
information required to consider granting approval to the draft plan of
subdivision, file 34T-SO2503, located at 10141 Talbotville Gore Road in
the Township of Southwold.
Resolution Number: CW26-62
Moved by: Deputy Warden Jones
Seconded by: Councillor Noble
RESOLVED THAT the Council of the Corporation of the County of Elgin
grants draft plan approval to Draft Plan of Subdivision 34T-SO2503,
Township of Southwold, 10141 Talbotville Gore Road, certified by Gavin
PT Seaman, OLS., dated November 23, 2025; and
THAT staff be directed to provide notice of decision subject to the
conditions of final approval in accordance with the requirements of the
Planning Act.
Motion Carried.
6.4 County Clerk/Manager of Administrative Services - ADM 26-20
Updates to the Elgin County Procedural By -Law
The County Clerk/Manager of Administrative Services presented the
report that proposes minor adjustments to the Procedural By -Law to
further clarify processes and procedures.
Resolution Number: CW26-63
Moved by: Councillor Couckuyt
Seconded by: Councillor Hentz
RESOLVED THAT the proposed updates to the Elgin County Procedural
By-law, as contained in the report titled "ADM 26-20 Updates to Elgin
County Procedural By-law" be approved; and
THAT said By-law be prepared for adoption.
Motion Carried.
7. Adjournment
Resolution Number: CW26-64
Moved by: Deputy Warden Jones
Seconded by: Councillor Widner
RESOLVED THAT we do now adjourn at 12:23 p.m. to meet again on June 23,
2026 at 9:30 a.m.
Motion Carried.
Page 4 of 25
Katherine Thompson, Dominique Giguere,
County Clerk/Manager of Warden.
Administrative Services.
Page 5 of 25
/00
,000 0
ElginCc),L,inty
Report to Committee of the Whole
From: Lindsay King, Policy Planner
Date: June 23, 2026
Subject: PLN 26-10 Hospital Expansion Lands Official Plan Amendment No. CE OPA-
01-26
Recommendation(s):
THAT Elgin County approve Official Plan Amendment No. CE OPA-01-26, adopted by
the Council of the Municipality of Central Elgin on April 13, 2026; and
THAT staff be directed to provide Notice of this Decision in accordance with the
requirements of the Planning Act.
Introduction:
The purpose of this report is to provide Elgin County Council with a recommendation
regarding Official Plan Amendment No. CE OPA-01-26, adopted by the Municipality of
Central Elgin on April 13t", 2026, respecting the former St. Thomas Psychiatric Hospital
lands. The proposed Official Plan Amendment establishes a comprehensive planning
policy framework to guide the long-term redevelopment of the subject lands as a mixed -
use community containing residential, commercial institutional, open space, and
supporting land use designations.
As the approval authority for the local municipal official plans and official plan
amendments within Elgin County, County Council is required to consider and render a
decision on the adopting amendment.
Background and Discussion:
The subject lands are located within the Municipality of Central Elgin and were
previously brought into the Elgin County Tier 1 Settlement Area designation through the
approval of Elgin County Official Plan in 2025. The subject application serves to
redesignate the subject lands under the Central Elgin Official Plan. Accordingly, the
proposed development represents growth within a designated settlement area that is
aligned with Elgin County's long-term land use vision.
Page 6 of 25
The redevelopment of the former hospital lands is occurring in the context of significant
economic growth anticipated in the region. In 2023, the Governments of Canada and
Ontario announced an investment agreement with Volkswagen Group to establish an
electric vehicle battery manufacturing facility within the City of St. Thomas. The facility is
anticipated to create approximately 3,000 direct jobs and is expected to generate
significant demand for housing and supporting services throughout the surrounding
area. The Municipality of Central Elgin has identified the former hospital lands as a
strategic opportunity to accommodate a portion of this anticipated growth through the
development of a complete community containing a mix of residential, commercial,
institutional, and open space uses.
Figure 1 - Overview of the Subject Lands
To support the redevelopment of the lands, Central Elgin has undertaken a
comprehensive planning process including the preparation of a vision and guiding
principles framework, technical studies, public consultation, agency circulation, and the
preparation of Official Plan Amendment No. CE OPA-01-26. The Amendment
establishes a detailed framework respecting land use designations, housing mix and
density, transportation and servicing considerations, parks and open space planning,
cultural heritage conservation, archaeology, and implementation mechanisms for future
development approvals.
Plannina Anaivsis:
The subject lands are comprised of approximately 168 hectares, located within the
Municipality of Central Elgin. Through the approval of the Elgin County Official Plan in
2025, the lands were incorporated into the County Tier 1 Settlement Area, establishing
Page 7 of 25
the long-term policy framework for the subject planning application and future
development of the site.
The purpose of the Official Plan Amendment No. CE OPA-01-26 is to redesignate the
lands from the existing "Special Policy Area 1 — St. Thomas Psychiatric Hospital" and
"Agricultural" designations to a mix of residential, commercial, institutional, and open
space designations within the Central Elgin Official Plan, as illustrated Figure 1, and
attached as Appendix A in greater resolution. The Amendment establishes a
comprehensive policy framework intended to guide the long-term redevelopment of the
former hospital lands through future planning approvals, including zoning by-law
amendments, plans of subdivision, and site plan control applications.
Figure 2 - Land Use Plan
The redevelopment of the former hospital lands is occurring within the context of
significant economic growth anticipated in the region related to the planned Volkswagen
electric vehicle battery manufacturing facility. From a county perspective, the principal
land use question respecting the future urbanization of the lands has already been
addressed through the County Official Plan process, which identified the subject lands
as part of the County Settlement Area. As such, County staff generally defer to the
Municipality of Elgin with respect to the detailed land use planning framework and the
appropriateness of specific land use designations, provided they are consistent with the
broader settlement area objectives established through the County Official Plan.
County staff are satisfied that the proposed Amendment implements the County Official
Plan's settlement area policies by providing a framework for a complete community
containing a range of residential, commercial, institutional, and open space uses. The
Page 8 of 25
Amendment supports the efficient use of designated settlement area lands and provides
an appropriate policy basis for future growth and development.
With respect to municipal servicing, the subject lands currently benefit from existing
municipal water and wastewater infrastructure associated with the former hospital lands.
While upgrades to water, wastewater, and stormwater infrastructure will be required to
accommodate the full build -out contemplated through the Amendment, the supporting
planning work recognizes these requirements and identifies a phased approach to
development. Given the size of the lands and the long-term nature of the proposed
development, County staff are satisfied that future development can be coordinated with
infrastructure improvements, servicing capacity, and stormwater management
requirements through subsequent planning and engineering approvals.
�mc�cn��ntiyuc�
County staff are also satisfied that natural heritage features located on the subject lands
have been appropriately considered through the planning process. The proposed land
use framework directs development away from identified natural heritage features and
establishes and open space network intended to protect environmental functions while
accommodating future growth. A detailed natural heritage review of the site confirms
that an Environmental Impact Study will be submitted for review through subsequent
planning stages.
County staff further note that portions of the former hospital complex are subject to
heritage designation and contain buildings of recognized cultural heritage value.
Through the preparation of the proposed land use framework, consideration has been
given to the retention and adaptive reuse of select heritage resources, particularly those
Page 9 of 25
located within the front portion of the complex, as identified in the supporting concept
plans. At the same time, the applicant has advised that a number of the existing
structures have deteriorated significantly and many not be suitable for long-term
retention. County staff acknowledge that any future alterations, demolition, or
redevelopment involving designated heritage resources will be subject to the
Municipality of Central Elgin's heritage review processes and the applicable heritage
requirements, including any necessary heritage and demolition approvals. As such, the
proposed Official Plan Amendment does not preclude the appropriate evaluation and
management of heritage resources through subsequent planning and municipal
approval processes.
The agricultural implications of the redevelopment were previously considered through
the County Official Plan process when the lands were incorporated into the County Tier
1 Settlement Area. Nevertheless, an Agricultural Impact Assessment was prepared in
support of the application. The Assessment concluded that the subject lands represent
a lower -priority agricultural area due to the proximity to existing settlement areas,
established non-agricultural uses, existing fragmentation of the surrounding agricultural
areas, and the limited agricultural activity occurring on the lands. The Assessment
further concluded that redevelopment of the lands would not adversely impact the ability
of nearby agricultural operations to continue or expand and that the subject lands
represented the preferred alternative from an agricultural perspective.
The application has been circulated to the applicable review agencies and government
ministries, including the Conservation Authorities. No objections to the proposed Official
Plan Amendment have been identified. County staff further note that Infrastructure
Ontario, as owner of the lands, has authorized the application and that archaeological
matters have been addressed to the satisfaction of the Ministry of Citizenship and
Multiculturalism.
Based on the foregoing, County staff are satisfied that Official Plan Amendment No. CE
OPA-01-26 conforms with the Elgin County Official Plan, is consistent with the
Provincial Planning Statement, 2024, and represents an appropriate implementation of
the County's previously approved settlement area framework for the subject lands.
Financial Implications:
There are no direct financial implications associated with the approval of Official Plan
Amendment No. CE OPA-01-26. Future development of lands may result in long-term
assessment growth, increased housing supply, and economic development
opportunities within Elgin County and the Municipality of Central Elgin. Infrastructure
and servicing requirements associated with future development will be evaluated
through subsequent planning and engineering approval processes.
Advancement of the Strateaic Plan:
The proposed Official Plan Amendment advances Elgin County's Strategic Plan by
supporting coordinated and sustainable growth within a designated settlement area.
The Amendment facilitates the development of a complete community through the
Page 10 of 25
provision of a mix of housing types, commercial opportunities, parks and open spaces,
transportation connections, and community -supportive land uses. The Amendment also
supports long-term economic growth, housing supply objectives, and coordinated inter -
municipal planning.
Local Municipal Partner Impact:
The Municipality of Central Elgin is supportive of the proposed Official Plan Amendment
and adopted CE OPA-01-26 on April 13, 2026. Approval of the Amendment will permit
Central Elgin to proceed with subsequent planning approvals necessary to facilitate
redevelopment of the lands, including zoning by-law amendments, draft plan of
subdivision approvals, and site plan approvals. County Staff have worked
collaboratively with Central Elgin staff throughout the review process and are satisfied
that the Amendment appropriately implements the long-term vision established by Elgin
Council for the redevelopment of the former hospital lands.
Communication Requirements:
Central Elgin has administered a technical circulation consistent with the Planning Act
requirements and have no outstanding technical concerns. Furthermore, Central Elgin
administered a robust public consultation campaign including two Public Open House
on October 8t", 2025, and February 27t", 2026; an online survey from September to
November 2025; multiple stakeholder engagement meetings and workshops,
consultation with nine First Nations communities, and a public meeting on March 2,
2026. County staff are of the opinion that Central Elgin has exceeded the minimum
requirements for consultation and public notification.
Notice of Elgin County Council's decision respecting Official Plan Amendment No. CE
OPA-01-26 shall be provided in accordance with the Planning Act. Should the
Amendment be approved by Elgin County Council, notice of approval will be issued by
the County in accordance with the applicable legislative requirements including
information respecting the appeal rights and the effective date of the amendment.
County staff are satisfied that Official Plan Amendment No. CE OPA-01-26 conforms
with the Elgin County Official Plan, is consistent with the Provincial Planning Statement,
2024, and appropriately implements the County's previously approved Tier 1 Settlement
Area framework for the subject lands. County staff further note that all required technical
and public circulations have been completed and no outstanding concerns remain.
Attachments:
Appendix A — Schedule K1 Hospital Lands Land Use Plan
All of which is Respectfully Submitted Approved for Submission
Lindsay King Blaine Parkin
Policy Planner Chief Administrative Officer
Page 11 of 25
Reviewed for Submission
Mat Vaughan
Director of Planning
Page 12 of 25
-
U
Q
N
N
N
v °t
(O
r p p N
.o
m aci .� m
m
m aci
y m T
O
LL
LL .
LL E
>
m
N
d d
W J
o
n n
u
a a
LL
u m
N
g p> o
v 0 m
¢
c
3
a
Q
m N
C
C C
M M .-.
g `-
O
(n
a Y Y a
d' 'y 'N T �' a1 a
O
c_ Y O
N a)
O.2
a
a) C °�
co m ,9
—
VI v
a' Ul — m v
m Q) m o c
m e .= v
N p
-p Ut
v E_
c v° v
O
i5� Nd
m C
,ia
x a
O C Q.
. N
N
3 3
p p
.T.
m o a°
c c m
Y aa)
'c CO0
Y 0 a`
y x
.�
N a` ¢
> E° x vv c
� � ED
x J v o
� . �a
a,
a
°
U
m N fA m
/. ♦,
v= J
0
0 0¢.
C C T
y *5
m E E m >
0 E N
>c
E .-
3 m°
E W tQ
o m
O x O v F W J
F c
>.
y O i
y
O O o
N N
3 N N °. m E (6
E
O° x i6
N Y > V .'..' t6
.'..' N Q i0 i6
's
C% wwa..�ww h O
+`'M
'o
O`I`I`IIa
2 U
U
U O z�
m eft¢` z O
z J x x
C��
a
��j
o
/00
,000 0
ElginCc),L,inty
Report to Committee of the Whole
From: Holly Hurley, Director of People and Culture
Date: June 11, 2026
Subject: PAC 26-04 Non -Union Job Evaluation and Market Comparators
Recommendation(s):
THAT the following list of comparators for the job evaluation and market comparison
review, as contained in the June 11, 2026, report titled "Non -Union Job Evaluation and
Market Comparators" be approved.
• Oxford County
• Middlesex County
• City of St. Thomas
• The Municipality of Chatham -Kent
• County of Lambton
• County of Essex
• The County of Wellington
• The City of London
• Perth County
Introduction:
As part of the Elgin County Strategic plan, under Strategy 2 Organizational Culture and
Workforce Develop, Elgin County has two goals. First to develop competitive
employment packages that reflect the current labour market and second to regularly
update job descriptions to reflect current and future needs. We are looking for the
Committees recommendation and agreement on the comparators that will be used
during the market review of wages.
Background and Discussion:
Elgin County Council and the People and Culture department recognized the need for
improved job descriptions and an improved job evaluation tool. The non -union job
descriptions that were in place at the County had not been reviewed or updated in some
time. The County also has a job evaluation tool that is used to evaluate the job
descriptions. This job evaluation tool was based on different factors with a rating scale
Page 14 of 25
for each factor. The factors have a different weighting based on what was selected by
management at the time it was implemented. A need was identified for the job
evaluation tool to be updated to a more structured approach with well defined factors
and ratings. The current rating scale uses both negative, positive and whole numbers
which makes evaluating the jobs very subjective. There is also inconsistency in the
levels within the salary grid. This is due to inconsistency of job descriptions and job
requirements.
The People and Culture department included in its departmental plan for 2026 to
conduct a full job description review along with implementing a new job evaluation tool.
There are approximately 65 job descriptions that required updating. A new job
description template was developed that includes Elgin County's values and core
competencies (see attached). All employees were given the opportunity to take part in
the job description review. Employees were given one month to review their job
descriptions, and make suggested changes based on the work they do. After the month,
employees met with their managers to review the suggested changes. Managers had
one month to review their teams job descriptions and finalize. Once this was completed,
all the job descriptions were shared with People and Culture where another review was
completed to ensure consistencies across the organization.
The next phase of the project is to find a consultant through the RFQ process who will
provide a new job evaluation tool that is no longer subjective. All 65 job descriptions will
go through the new job evaluation tool. The consultant will also be tasked with doing a
market comparison for the non -union positions and will put forward a suggested salary
grid based on the comparison.
This comparison will include salary surveys with local comparators who are similar in
size and nature or where both pull from the same talent pool. People and Culture staff
would like Committees input on who they would like to see used as comparators. Staff
recommend the following list be used as a comparator based on location and size-
- Oxford County
- Middlesex County
- City of St. Thomas
- The Municipality of Chatham- Kent
- County of Lambton
- County of Essex
- The County of Wellington
- The City of London
- Perth County
Once Council agrees on the comparators, the Consultant will conduct the survey and
salary comparison to help formulate the new grid.
Once the project is completed, the consultant will prepare a final report for Council to
share the results of the market comparators.
Page 15 of 25
Financial Implications:
The cost of the project was included in the People and Culture Department for 2026.
The estimated cost of this project is approximately $35,000.
Advancement of the Strategic Plan:
This initiative supports a respectful, productive workplace culture by promoting
staff wellness and development, enabling the County to continue delivering high -quality
public services. It also aligns with the County's values of respect, integrity, and service
focus, fostering a positive organizational environment.
Local Municipal Partner Impact:
N/A
Communication Reauirements:
Communication will be provided to the employees to understand the status of the
project. Once the consultant is completed the review, a presentation to Council with
outcomes will be scheduled.
Conclusion:
All of which is Respectfully Submitted
Holly Hurley
Director of People and Culture
Approved for Submission
Blaine Parkin
Chief Administrative Officer
Page 16 of 25
10000& E I gi n C 0 j rii µ
Summary of Position:
Elgin County is guided by four core values —Respect, Integrity, Collaboration, and Service Focus.
These principles shape how we work, how we behave, support our collective success, and ensure
strong alignment across our organization.
Reporting to Title, the Title ......
Our employees play a vital role in advancing our mission, and the competencies and
responsibilities outlined below represent the skills and attributes that drive excellence across our
organization.
Ouir Coiire Coiurmlpeteiirmcliie
Accountability:
As an organization we take responsibility for actions and outcomes. We follow through, learn
openly from mistakes and act with integrity.
Collaborative and Inclusive Relationships:
As an organization we build trust by listening, communicating clearly, and creating space for all
voices. We value diverse perspectives and show up with empathy and professionalism.
Growth Oriented:
As an organization we stay curious, keep learning, and adapt to change. We use feedback and
digital tools to grow, and we help others grow too.
Customer Focus:
As an organization we understand the needs of internal partners and external customers. We
design with people in mind and deliver consistently respectful service.
Decision Making and Problem Solving:
As an organization we gather the right information, consider multiple perspectives and make
timely, well -reasoned decisions. We implement, learn, and adjust.
l e„ IIV'tcsllr ourmsliilll liilllliitliics lr ecl' liic "to Youir Illtollle
• XX
• XX
• XX
Our Leadership Competencies
• Education
• Experience
• Other requirements
• Technological requirements
• Other
Reports to: X
Department: X
Status: X
Date Reviewed: X
Unionized: Yes or No
Grid Level: X
Page 18 of 25
/00
,000 0
ElginCc),L,inty
Report to Committee of the Whole
From: Peter Dutchak, Director of Engineering Services
Date: June 23, 2026
Subject: ENG 26-16 County Asset Transfers
Recommendation(s):
THAT staff proceed with the road and bridge asset transfers as identified in the adopted
Transportation Master Plan with a goal to finalize the transfers by January 31 st, 2027,
and;
THAT funding be provided to receiving municipalities between 2027 to 2030 and as
identified in the Asset Transfer Funding Schedule Table contained within this report,
and;
THAT current Road Maintenance Agreement allocations continue until December 31,
2027 when the agreement expires.
Introduction:
County Council has directed staff to meet with our LMPs to discuss the assets proposed
to be transferred emanating from the road and bridge rationalization initiative of the
adopted Transportation Master Plan. Those discussions have occurred and this report
recommends the asset transfer process begin with a goal of being completed early in
2027.
Backaround and Discussion:
The County's CAO and Director of Engineering Services met with municipalities who will
be receiving transportation assets from the County as directed by County Council at
their March loth meeting. A summary table of those discussions is included in Appendix
`C' — LMP Meeting Summaries. Generally, LMPs did not dispute the assets selected to
be transferred and agreed they did not fulfill a regional transportation purpose. LMPs
were also generally concerned with future costs and liabilities associated with owning
additional assets. Comments received during these meetings were consistent with
formal comments received during TMP engagement and from local staff during
committee work.
Page 19 of 25
The concerns regarding funding that were received throughout the TMP study
influenced the development of the proposed transfer protocol. County staff has been
cognizant of competing financial pressures and have proposed that funding that has
been earmarked in the County's 10-Year Capital Plan should accompany asset
transfers to address these concerns for the near and medium term. However, this is
contrary to past practice and the authority the County possesses under the Municipal
Act to transfer assets without funding.
Appendix `A' lists the assets to be transferred along with planned capital project costs
contained within the County's 10-Year Capital Plan. Activities to begin the asset transfer
process are recommended to commence immediately with a goal to have them
completed early in 2027. Once property records have been collected and transfer
documents have been completed, all information the County possess (i.e. plans,
reports, agreements, etc.) about these assets will be sent digitally to each receiving
municipality.
Financial Implications:
Appendix `B' provides a funding summary and payment schedule that totals just over
$11 million. The funding schedule has been tailored to occur over the next four-year
period, coinciding with the next term of Council and at an annual amount that can be
managed by the County.
To assist LMPs with transitional funding, staff recommend maintaining RMA funding
allocations at their current rate and until the agreement expires on December 31, 2027.
Advancement of the Strategic Plan:
This initiative formed part of the Transportation Master Plan and supports the
responsible maintenance and management of County assets as laid out in the Asset
Management Plan. This work reflects the County's ongoing commitment to maintaining
safe, sustainable, and efficient facilities and infrastructure.
Local Municipal Partner Impact:
The asset transfer process is recommended to commence immediately with a goal of
completing the transfers early in 2027. LMPs will receive all information the County
possesses in regard to these assets digitally. Transitional funding will be distributed as
per the proposed payment schedule in Schedule `B' of this report.
Communication Reauirements:
Municipalities will receive a copy of this report and supporting Council resolution.
Conclusion:
Staff have met with each LMP who will be receiving asset transfers from the County and
as directed by County Council. Comments received during these meetings were
Page 20 of 25
consistent with previous comments received during the TMP study engagement and
during committee work.
Staff has proposed providing receiving municipalities with funding that has been
earmarked for these assets within the County's 10-Year Capital Plan. A funding
schedule has been created to distribute funding over the next four-year period.
Staff recommend initiating the asset transfer process immediately with a goal to have
transfers completed by January 31St, 2027.
All of which is Respectfully Submitted Approved for Submission
Peter Dutchak Blaine Parkin
Director of Engineering Services Chief Administrative Officer
Page 21 of 25
y
M
O
I
O
O
O
r�
O
O
O
N
O
O
O
O
M
O
N
N
W
O
O
M
M
O
H
M O
M O
O
O
r
W
N
I-
O
u,
CO
CO
M
O
O
N
I�
O O
O
O
O
m
of
O
j6
N
O
O
O
N
of
M
N
M
M O
CO
N
I�
M
M
N
M
M
O
N
O
O
N N
0
N
U
M
O
r
s
N
O
N
C
N
C
N
M
M
M
E
O
O
O
ON
R
MO
O
O
N
O
>>�
O
N
N
N
N
N
N
p
C
d
C C
C
O
C
O
O
C
75
O
75
p
O
N
W
`
O
00
s
N
.�-
of
W
N
N s
N
M
t6
t6
>i
N
N
C
-
O
0
O
O
0
0
O
N
0
O
O
N
Olal p
O
0
O
U
N
O
0
0
O
O
U
d'
0'
0'
0'
Z
0'
0'
0'
U
d'
d'
d'
>
i
co
N
Co
N
M
CO
O
N
O
O W
N
M
O
O
O
M M
CO
M
CO
1�
C
N
J
c
N
-p
J
U
<
Q
J
O
~
a
U
U
J
LL
N J
N
Z
ON
J
J
J
d
f d
N
�
�-
U)
�-
w_
�-
U)
iL
�_
J
�
E co
U
s
U)
O
M
N
N
M
L
L
N
O
V
O
O
O
(n O
N
'm
t6
O
C O
O
C
N
O
N
N
O
�p
J
d
p
U0�
W0�
J
0�
W
0�
N
E
w
LL
O
U U
W N
m
W
J
Y
J
d
J
J J
d d
J
N
C
J
Yk C
N
J W
W
N
C
N
C
i4 ?j
O
J
J
d
N
Wd
N J
Vl
f
f-
J
z
N
Z
O
w
N
>
N
N
W
m
O
m
O
W
L
co
LE
M (n
O
') (n
,
Os
00
-p
E >
L
L
m
-O
N
N>
0
o
O
OO
O
O
(n
O N
N
O
N
'6
0
'O
0
0
N
J
co J
(n
(n
d
� W
O
W
W
W
>✓
y
M
N
of
�W
N
-p
N
U
C -p
C
C
U
U
m
mcu
V
�p
N
J t6
m
J
J
N -O
C
to
N
O O
O
O
N
N
m
>✓
m
U
O
m
N
N
65 O
J
O
m m
m
m
(n
C
(D
m
N
15
(D
N t6
Y
Y
C
O
O
N
.E
O W
m
s
s
U
W
LL
LL
ECl)
W
s
N
>
cn
Q
1
N
N
N
N
N
Cf
N
N
C
C C
s
N
N
N N
N
t6
t6
t6
N N
N
N
s
T
s
T
s
T
s
T
s
T
N
N
C
C
C C
C
C
C
C
Q
Q Q
O
U
m
m
m
m
m
Q
g
U
U
U U
U
U
U
U
Q
Q
N
r
r
N
LO
N
l—
O
N
JN
W
O
F-
^^(U
LL
co co O 00 O
4 4 O co O m
'a LO) N O N �t
LO) N LO) O) O O)
O '}' M I-- N
LL — CO- co- LO) (O
d
th
i.
L
r
H
ts)
r
A,
_W •V_
a
W
V
cn
C
E N
CL �1
i a
LL
W
ti
N
O
N
R
R
O O O O O
O
LO OO LO)O
O
�OOioo
of
CD
O O
O O
M
O LO O LO) O
�-
LO) �t (D 00 O
to
(D O � LO)
Il-
61) 61) 61) 61) 61) fR l
i
U
0 L1J
C E
O
tj
R
0 C a+
0 U) U 0(0 I—O
O O O O
O Lq O O
LO) O to
O O O ti
O LO) O O
(0 00 LO) to
O � O ti
N N
N
O
N
R
i.
R
n
LO
N
O
m
N
N
O1
cc
N
O
N
C
cc
co
cc
ti
cu
cu
—
ON
O
N OIn
cu
>'
cu
(n
p p
0
c
Ocu
Uo
E
�
M O
U
L
U��Q
0 , >
0-a)
cu
_Q
E�c�-Q�c�
0
�
4L—
�
cu
_0 cu
^"—m
U
�
m�
O U
Q
�
�
�cvvE70
�
L
�
fn
�
(Cf
cu
cu
m
(Q O
O = O
cQ
(
O
L O
' O�
O
O
,�
O O
,_ -
U�
O
cCf
C-
0
v
Q�0Em�._
=_ H
cn
cn
c�
O
��,cm
m
E
-.>�
�- p
o�
O
�_
m
����
:t--
cn
cI
L c
o4=
L
�-0z
p 2
O L O
��
�'�
E
O75
�
W
O
a
E
.� >+ 0
O
-5
A�
O
= O _I
�
L
O O
L
O —
�
>,�
"�
of
0
U—
W
L
E u,
p c
O
U
--0 cn
O
O
J
m
O �-
0
O U
0
U�
`'- �
U
4-
O
. U
>, cn
�_
U
O
ry c
�- O-
O cu
CU cu
> O
N
O
.O
O
!
CO
O
tOn ai O cu
cQ
E -
--c
L
U
0 a)
j5•
in
in U
� . in
� a)
0
in
U
��
mE���Xx0�O0
��x��m�0`L°
mO
i- cu
U cu O
O
U U
_I cn
O O
c
cu - U
O
(n
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
O
O
—� N
m (n
_0
o
O
cu
to
0
cn
E
2
U
>,
O
O
U
0
cu
��
O
p
�E��
�0m
a)
(°'
4-(n
Z
0
Q
i
0
c 0-
U
CU
OU
n
L
m �
m E
6
O-0
�
�
O 0
-0 (n
�
� U
cu O
j
(n
cn
o
f
> °'
°'
°'
c-
p O
V
cu
OU
L
CO upi v
a)
a
W
0
cu
E
W
m
,_
v
a)
o
�-
cu
X cncm
O
f
O
U
cm
a) O 0
O-0
O
U
-0
a
ocm
O
o
cu
cu
>
O
U O
�_
O P
0 p O
0 W
0 0
0 0
O
O
O
(tf
> O
V
O
U U U
D
O
O
''
5
L 0
''
fn O
U cn
c� L
0-
O
E U >
o
p
>
cu
a�"—
-0
O
fn
E E
0
cu
�- L
O
O
U
p
O—
O
(B
p
>
a)
0
LL LL
O
(n 0
X>
O >
>�
>
cv
-0
,_
Z
0-
O
U
_
cm
W
cu
cm
Q
O
w
0
0
0
Q
U)
U
LO
N
O
N
N
0)
m
0-
_
_0
cu
cu
E
_
Lcu
O
(Q
U
LL
L
M
O�
cu 0
0-0
U
°`U
cn�m
U
xo
a)a)
E�
a)=�
a
aUO
700>,
a)
0)
E
4
a)
cu
.�
U a) O
cu
4—
O
CU
4— N
(n—
OL E L
(CS
0
L)
O
L
U
a)
(n cu
� U
O L a) in
U a) (n �
+- _Q
_
p-0
c -�
0 >,
U
:
c
E
(n
O O
-0
O L O
OCU
-0
c C�
a) 0
E c
O cu
(n
0_70
�
O —O
a) O O
O
(n,U
w E
W-a
O
w
U a)
E O
m QL
cu
cu
CU �__
cu
' —
(n
(n _
cCf
O
to
L .—
a)
O
- >
(Q
CU -
(Q L a) (Q O
L
cu
—
0
a)
E
E cu X
E a)
O
�-
�_
L
>
E
>
V CL a) L L L
a) >, (n
L O
O
`�cuD-0)�
L
O
a)
O
a)
O _0
m>�0
Z.
Q U
aa)i
2-0
O-
O
cCf
�E'X
cu
W U)
Ucvcccs
E cu
C�-
m
�
J
O
(Cf
0
O) (n
O
O -0
cu
cu
a)
cv �-
L3 cB Rf
cu
to '�
OL a)
4�-- O
O 0-0 a)
-0
Q�� cv
QEo
u,
CO
�.� O cu
(n
to -O
Ea)
�E�
O
a) X p
E c� —
= O
U
cu X cB (n
a)
0
CU �
0
L Q.
-0'~ CU ( V
0
L
(,)
(n -0
C L ,N
cu
cu
a)
cu
O 0 U
L
(n
L
(n
-� — _0 cu
cu
� cu CU
cu
OL
O O
3
O = 4�--
Z
W G
=
v) cu
U cu Z) U
E
c
cu
cu
Cc
G
co
LO
N
O
LO
N
(1)
O1