The URL can be used to link to this page

06 - April 10, 2012 County Council Agenda PackageORDERS OF THE DAY FOR TUESDAY, APRIL 10, 2012 - 9 :00 A.M. ORDER 1st Meeting Called to Order 2nd Adoption of Minutes - March 27, 2012 3rd Disclosure of Pecuniary Interest and the General Nature Thereof 4th Presenting Petitions, Presentations and Delegations 5th Motion to Move Into "Committee Of The Whole Council" 6th Reports of Council, Outside Boards and Staff 7th 2012 Composite Budget 8th Council Correspondence 1) Items for Consideration 2) Items for Information (Consent Agenda) 9th OTHER BUSINESS 1) Statements /Inquiries by Members 2) Notice of Motion 3) Matters of Urgency 10th Closed Meeting Items - see separate addendum 11th Recess 12th Motion to Rise and Report 13th Motion to Adopt Recommendations from the Committee Of The Whole 14th Consideration of By -Laws 15th ADJOURNMENT LUNCH WILL BE PROVIDED NOTICE: Deputy Warden for April - Jack Couckuyt April 24, 2012 9:00 a.m. - County Council Meeting 1:00 p.m. - Code of Conduct Session May 8, 2012 9:00 a.m. - County Council Meeting 1 DRAFT COUNTY COUNCIL MINUTES Tuesday, March 27, 2012 The Elgin County Council met this day at the Administration Building at 10:34 a.m. with all members present. Warden Walters in the Chair. ADOPTION OF MINUTES Moved by Councillor Mennill Seconded by Councillor Couckuyt THAT the minutes of the meeting held on March 13, 2012 be adopted. - Carried. DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST AND THE GENERAL NATURE THEREOF — Warden Walters and Councillors Couckuyt and Wiehle declared, at the appropriate time, a conflict of interest with regard to the Closed Meeting report concerning 99 Edward Street, St. Thomas, as it might prejudice their position as Council appointees on the Elgin St. Thomas Public Health Board. At the appropriate time, they vacated the Council Chambers and refrained from discussing and voting on the item. Moved by Councillor McIntyre Seconded by Councillor Marr THAT we do now move into Committee Of The Whole Council. - Carried. REPORTS Health Partnership Activities and Budget for 2012 — Councillor Appointee to the Health Recruitment Partnership Councillor McWilliam presented the report, updating council on the activities of the partnership. Moved by Councillor McWilliam Seconded by Councillor Couckuyt THAT the 2012 budget for the Health Recruitment Partnership be approved; and, THAT Barbara Murray be reappointed as the Health Recruitment Specialist. - Carried. Hair Care Services: Bobier Villa — Director of Homes and Seniors Services The director presented the report regarding the contract for hair care at Bobier. Moved by Councillor Marr Seconded by Councillor Jenkins THAT Hair On Wheels be awarded a three -year contract for hair care services at Bobier Villa commencing on June 5, 2012; and, THAT based on satisfactory performance, cost and service, subsequent renewal up to a five - year term may be granted; and, THAT the Warden and Chief Administrative Officer be authorized to sign the contract. - Carried. 2 International Plowing Match Legacy Fund Scholarship Criteria — Director of Community & Cultural Services The director presented the report on the criteria for awarding two agricultural scholarships each year. Moved by Councillor McIntyre Seconded by Councillor Mennill THAT the attached criteria in the International Plowing Match (IPM) Legacy Agricultural Scholarship dated March 6, 2012, be adopted; and, THAT the Warden, a representative of the 2010 IPM Executive Committee and the Director of Community & Cultural Services serve on the scholarship committee until otherwise notified. - Carried. Updated Expense Report Forms — Financial Analyst The Director of Financial Services presented the new format for expense forms. Moved by Councillor Jenkins Seconded by Councillor Marr THAT the updated expense report forms be approved; and, THAT the County's Procedural By -law and relevant policies be amended to reflect that change. - Carried. Tourism Siqnaqe Grant: Non - Profit Organizations — Marketing Assistant The Marketing Assistant presented the report, recommending signage for non - profit organizations. Moved by Councillor Couckuyt Seconded by Councillor Wiehle THAT County Council approve the applications from the East Elgin Community Complex, Lake Erie Salmon and Trout Club and the Catfish Creek Conservation Authority for tourism directional signage grants; and, THAT the report titled "Tourism Signage Grant: Non - Profit Organizations" dated March 15, 2012 be received and filed. - Carried. CORRESPONDENCE Items for Information (Consent Agenda) 1. Paul Shaffer, Executive Director, Elgin -St. Thomas United Way, with a letter thanking the County for the hockey game held in support of the local United Way. 2. Frank Lattanzio with a press release regarding Arbor Week's 140th anniversary celebration. 3. Jeff Lawrence, Elgin County Tree Commissioner and Weed Inspector with a press release regarding an education campaign launched by the County to help woodlot owners. 4. Information regarding the Power of Solar — A one -day seminar showcasing solar opportunities for home, business, and farm. 5. Economic Development — 2011 Year in Review 3 Moved by Councillor Mennill Seconded by Councillor Marr THAT Correspondence Items #1 — 5 be received and filed. - Carried. OTHER BUSINESS Statements /Inquiries by Members Warden Walters noted that the provincial and federal budgets were being introduced this week and invited councillors to forward information to the Chief Administrative Officer of any pertinent developments that may be of interest to the county. Notice of Motion — None. Matters of Urgency Warden Walters inquired about the condition of the Lake Road. The Director of Engineering Services reported the road is still safe to drive on and the condition is being monitored. Closed Meeting Item Moved by Councillor Marr Seconded by Councillor McWilliam THAT we do now proceed into closed meeting session in accordance with the Municipal Act, Section 240.2 (a) the security of the property of the municipality or local board — 99 Edward Street. - Carried. Warden Walters and Councillors Couckuyt and Wiehle vacated the Council Chambers at 10:55 a.m. Deputy Warden Mennill in the Chair. The Director of Financial Services presented the report on 99 Edward Street. Motion to Rise and Report Moved by Councillor Jenkins Seconded by Councillor Ens THAT we do now rise and report. - Carried. Moved by Councillor Ens Seconded by Councillor Marr THAT the confidential report titled "The Amendment to Sale of 99 Edward Street" dated March 19, 2012 be received and filed. - Carried. Warden Walters and Councillors Couckuyt and Wiehle returned to the Council Chambers at 11:00 a.m., and the Warden took the Chair. Motion to Adopt Recommendations of the Committee of the Whole Moved by Councillor McIntyre Seconded by Councillor Jenkins THAT we do now adopt recommendations of the Committee Of The Whole. - Carried. 4 County Council 4 March 27, 2012 BY -LAWS Moved by Councillor Marr Seconded by Councillor McWilliam THAT By -Law No. 12 -07 "Being a By -Law to Establish a Pay Schedule for Employees Covered by the Job Evaluation Scale" be read a first, second and third time and finally passed. - Carried. Moved by Councillor Mennill Seconded by Councillor Couckuyt THAT By -Law No. 12 -08 "Being a By -Law to Confirm Proceedings of the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the County of Elgin at the March 13, 2012 Meeting" be read a first, second and third time and finally passed. - Carried. ADJOURNMENT Moved by Councillor Marr Seconded by Councillor McIntyre THAT we do now adjourn at 11:02 a.m. and meet again on April 10, 2012 at the County Administration Building Council Chambers at 9:00 a.m. Mark G. McDonald, Chief Administrative Officer. 5 - Carried. Bill Walters, Warden. REPORTS OF COUNCIL AND STAFF April 10, 2012 Council Reports — (ATTACHED) Councillor Jim McIntyre — St. Thomas Elgin General Redevelopment Project Staff Reports — (ATTACHED) Manager of Archives — Elgin County Archives — Recent Acquisitions and Activities Business Development Coordinator — Farm to School Web Partnership Directory of Community and Cultural Services — Funding for Library Radio Program Director of Engineering Services — Ambulance Base Building Committee — Reactivation Director of Engineering Services — Emergency Services Response Time Performance Plan Director of Engineering Services — Ambulance Year End Report - 2011 Director of Engineering Services — Emergency Medical Services — Bayham Deputy Director of Engineering Services — Signage Removal and Installation 6 REPORT TO: Mayor Jackson and Members of St. Thomas City Council and Warden Walters and Members of Elgin County Council FROM: Special Joint Committee on Hospital Redevelopment DATE: March 30, 2012 SUBJECT: St. Thomas Elgin General Redevelopment Project DISCUSSION: The special committee on hospital redevelopment met on this date to consider the recent announcement regarding the hospital's project funding which was included in the provincial budget. While disappointed to learn that the redevelopment initiative will be "re- scoped" in some yet unknown fashion, the committee recommends that both City and County councils send a strong signal of support for the project to the Minister of Health, the Minister of Finance and the Premier of Ontario. The following resolution is therefore recommended for consideration. WHEREAS the redevelopment of the St. Thomas Elgin General Hospital is vitally important to the Elgin -St. Thomas community; and, WHEREAS the revitalization project is now being "re- scoped" as part of the provincial government's austerity measures contained in its budget package released on March 27th, 2012; and, WHEREAS the details of the provincial commitment and the new "scope" of the project remain unknown at this time; and, WHEREAS municipal budgets must be approved in the very near future; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Councils of the City of St. Thomas and the County of Elgin do hereby officially declare their support for the redevelopment of the St. Thomas Elgin General Hospital as originally proposed and provincially approved; and further, THAT both Councils commit to providing a contribution to the redevelopment campaign during future budget deliberations and after the project parameters are finally determined; and, THAT this resolution of support be sent to the Ministers of Health and Finance and the Premier of Ontario with copies to M. P. P Jeff Yurek, Chris Bentley and the hospital foundation. All of which is respectfully submitted, The Special Joint Committee on Hospital Redevelopment 7 Ministry of Health and Long -Term Care Office of the Minister 10th Floor, Hepburn Block 80 Grosvenor Street Toronto ON M7A 2C4 Tel 416- 327 -4300 Fax 416- 326 -1571 www.health.gov.on.ca April 2, 2012 Ministere de la Sante et des Soins de longue duree Bureau du ministre 10e stage, edifice Hepburn 80, rue Grosvenor Toronto ON M7A 2C4 Tel 416- 327 -4300 Telec 416- 326 -1571 www.health.gov.on.ca Mr. Bill Walters Warden Elgin County 450 Sunset Drive St. Thomas ON N5R 5V1 Dear Warden Walters: H LTC2966 M C- 2012 -1362 Thank you for your letter regarding the St. Thomas Elgin General Hospital (STEGH) redevelopment project. My staff will be in touch to set up a meeting, however I'd like to take this opportunity to provide you with an update. In light of the current fiscal situation, the ministry was asked to review major hospital projects not yet under construction to determine potential for savings. The province carefully reviewed its multi -year infrastructure investment plan, in order to find savings to help Ontario balance the budget. As indicated in the Budget released March 27, the STEGH Emergency, Ambulatory and Mental Health (EAMH) Project will be subject to a review of its scope to ensure both affordability and alignment with the priorities indicated in the Action Plan for Health Care. I'd like to assure you that the decision to re -scope this project was not taken lightly. On Wednesday March 28, 2012, ministry officials met with STEGH and the South West Local Health Integration Network to discuss the details and implications of the decision to re -scope the STEGH EAMH project. The hospital has been asked to re- examine and prioritize the programs and services components to be included within the re- scoped project. The Acute Mental Health Bridging Plan project and the Demolition of the Snell Building will be included in the re- scoped project. The ministry awaits the hospital's decisions on the re- scoped project and its revised plan to support its decisions. At this time, the previously set project timelines, including project tendering in 2014/15 remain in place. The ministry has not committed to a grant for the STEGH EAMH project beyond the $900,000 approved on July 23, 2006, for completing the Stage 1 Proposal and Stage 2 Functional Program submissions. ...2 1671 -01 (03/04) 8 7530 -4658 -2- Warden Walters Upon ministry approval to implement the STEGH EAMH project, the timing of the release of funds for the project will be determined based upon the procurement approach selected and the project schedule. A final Total Project Cost and the corresponding ministry grant will be determined at the time of the Commercial Close based on the bid results, when the Final Estimate of Cost is known. It's important to note that only once the bid results are known would the province commit to providing a grant for the STEGH EAMH project. Also, please be aware that the ministry approved grant is the maximum amount of funding that would be provided. To be clear, the STEGH project has not been cancelled, nor delayed. But we will be re- scoping the size of the project. hope this update is of assistance. We'll be in touch to set up a meeting in the near future. Sincerely, Deb Matthews Minister c: Heather Jackson - Chapman, Mayor, City of St. Thomas Wendell Graves, Chief Administrative Officer, City of St. Thomas Mark McDonald, Chief Administrative Officer, County of Elgin Michael Barrett, CEO, South West LHIN Paul Collins, President and CEO, St. Thomas Elgin General Hospital 1671 -01 (03/04) 7530 -4658 box' ,fib REPORT TO COUNTY COUNCIL FROM: Stephen Francom Manager of Archives DATE: March 21, 2012 SUBJECT: Elgin County Archives — Recent Acquisitions and Activities INTRODUCTION: The Elgin County Archives is pleased to present an overview of recent acquisitions and activities for Council's information. DISCUSSION: This report provides information on recent initiatives of the Elgin County Archives focusing on five principal areas: Acquisitions; Programming and Outreach; Research; Projects; Strategic Planning. Acquisitions Key collections of records recently acquired or in prospect include: - Lt. Col. Ian D. Cameron collection - Elgin Federation of Agriculture records - 2010 I.P.M. Executive Committee records - Ron Payne collection - Ford St. Thomas Assembly Plant records - Steve Peters papers (prospective) - Thames Valley District School Board records relating to closed Elgin County/ City of St. Thomas schools (prospective). A future report will be brought forward for Council's consideration in the coming months regarding the scope and implications of such an acquisition. Programming and Outreach Activities undertaken to promote greater public awareness of and appreciation for the resources and programs of the Archives include: - Exhibits mounted in the Archives reference room - Virtual exhibits mounted online via the Archives website - Using social media tools - Public speaking engagements - Acting as a resource for local media Projects Key projects completed or continuing include: - Alma College history book - Elgin County Women's Institutes Tweedsmuir History Books digitization - Post - amalgamation constituent municipality records transfers - St. Thomas Times - Journal photographs digitization 10 DISCUSSION (continued): Research Archives staff provide timely, in -depth research assistance to a broad range of clients. Examples include: - County Council/ Officials — Administrative Services staff for historical background on capital funding issues requiring Council deliberation and decision - Lower -tier municipal officials — Dutton /Dunwich drainage superintendent for by -laws re: construction and funding of municipal drains - Genealogists — Information on two Japanese Alma College students, 1930s and `50s, for a family member on a personal research visit from Japan arranged through M.P.P. Steve Peters' office - Academics — University of Guelph Ph.D. candidate for thesis on the evolution of women's roles in agricultural fairs - Community Organizations — West Elgin Master Gardeners for Heritage Farm Show display on the history of potato cultivation in Elgin County - Media — CTV National News for images used in broadcast story on the closure of the Ford St. Thomas Assembly Plant Strategic Planning The Archives has identified the following as key strategic operational objectives: - To continue and accelerate the digitization and online publication of key components of its collections - To continue to identify and acquire high value collections of significance in documenting the history of Elgin County - To establish and foster relations with community partner/ support organizations - To contribute to planning and implementing solutions to the Archives' long -term storage needs CONCLUSION: The Elgin County Archives is pleased to present this overview of recent initiatives, with particular respect to acquisitions, programming and outreach, research, projects and strategic planning. Staff continue to receive positive feedback about the scope of services provided by the Archives to local municipalities, community organizations and the general public. RECOMMENDATION: THAT the report titled "Elgin County Archives — Recent Acquisitions and Activities" dated March 21st, 2012 be received and filed. All of which is Respectfully Submitted Stephen Francom Manager of Archives Brian Masschaele Director of Community and Cultural Services 11 Approved for Submission Mark G. McDonald Chief Administrative Officer n REPORT TO COUNTY COUNCIL FROM: Kate Burns, Business Development Coordinator DATE: April 2, 2012 SUBJECT: Farm to School Web Partnership INTRODUCTION: Elgin St. Thomas Public Health received funding under the Healthy Communities Partnership fund towards developing a web presence for their Farm to School fundraising program. In order to best promote the fundraising campaign and local food initiatives staff of both Economic Development and the Public Health discussed partnering to host the Farm to School program on the Savour Elgin website (www.savourelgin.ca). DISCUSSION: In order to build the Farm to School web presence with the existing Savour Elgin website a Letter of Agreement between Elgin County and the Elgin St. Thomas Public Health Unit needs to be signed to complete the transfer of funds. As noted in the Letter of Agreement (Appendix 1), Elgin County agrees to; - Work in partnership with Elgin St. Thomas Public Health on the creation and maintenance of the Farm to School pages - Lead the development of the online pages - Host and maintain the Farm to School pages as part of the Savour Elgin website Elgin St. Thomas Public Health agrees to; - Provide a one time grant of $5000 to the County of Elgin to cover the mutually agreed upon fees - Provide guidance, advice and work in partnership to develop the best possible pages The Farm to School pages will be developed under the Local Food tab of savourelgin.ca and will include building up to 10 pages of content and forms. Public Health staff will supply content for these pages. CONCLUSION: The partnership between the Economic Development Department and Elgin St. Thomas Public Health continues on the goals and objectives of the Economic Development Strategy and Action Plan 2011 -2014 in promoting local food and building productive partnerships within our communities. 12 RECOMMENDATION: THAT staff be authorized to accept a contribution of $5,000 from Elgin St. Thomas Public Health Unit in support of the Farm to School portal; AND THAT County Council directs the Chief Administrative Officer to sign the letter of agreement with the Elgin St. Thomas Public Health Unit pertaining to the Farm to School portal. Respectfully Submitted Approved for Submission Kate Burns Mark G. McDonald Business Development Coordinator Chief Administrative Officer Alan Smith, General Manager Economic Development 13 Letter of Agreement Between County of Elgin AND Elgin -St Thomas Public Health Re: Farm to School Portal Preamble: Elgin St. Thomas Public Health recently initiated a large scale community planning and engagement strategy funded through the Ministry of Health Promotion and Sport. The goal of this initiative is to support and encourage the development of healthy public policy locally. To achieve this goal Public Health was charged with creating a partnership, developing and regularly updating a community picture, and developing and implementing a plan to support healthy public policy development. The Healthy Communities Partnership led a community engagement and planning process in 2011. Through this process it was identified that in Elgin St. Thomas there is a need to increase access to local healthy food. In order to increase opportunities for residents to enjoy local produce the Healthy Communities Partnership, led by Elgin St. Thomas Public Health, will be funding a Farm to School Web Portal. This Portal will include the creation of an online tool to enable the expansion of the piloted Farm to School Fundraiser initiated in 2011 by Elgin St. Thomas Public Health. The Farm to School Fundraiser provides opportunities for local growers to sell their produce as a school fundraiser. It also provides educational materials for the classroom and in the home. The primary goal of this project is to improve access to local healthy foods in Elgin St. Thomas. It is anticipated that this project will be completed by March 315t, 2012. The County of Elgin agrees to: • Work in partnership with Elgin St. Thomas Public Health on the creation and maintenance of the Farm to School Portal. • Lead the development of the online portal. • Host and maintain the Farm to School Portal as part of the Savour Elgin website. Elgin St. Thomas Public Health agrees to: • Provide a one -time grant of $5,000 to the County of Elgin to cover the mutually agreed upon fees. • Provide guidance, advice and work in partnership to develop the best possible portal. Letter of Agreement 14 2012 This agreement will be valid for a two year period. Upon which the Portal will be reviewed to determine program performance and if continuation is warranted. r4%� 1 . 56/72_ C ia0 John , Date Executive Director Elgin -St Thomas Public Health Mark MacDonald Chief Administrative Officer County of Elgin Date Letter of Agreement 15 2012 n REPORT TO COUNTY COUNCIL FROM: Brian Masschaele, Director of Community and Cultural Services DATE: March 26th, 2012 SUBJECT: Funding for Library Radio Program INTRODUCTION: This report informs Council that Elgin County Library has received $10,000 from Mennonite Community Services, Aylmer to further support the library's award winning radio program, "Check It In... Check It Out ". DISCUSSION: Staff are pleased to report that Mennonite Community Services, Aylmer has made a $10,000 contribution to the Elgin County Library as part of a larger grant of $116,000 received by MCS from the Ontario Trillium Foundation in 2011. These funds will be used to pay for broadcasting time until the end of March 2013 for the library's "Check It In... Check It Out" radio program which airs bi- weekly on 105.9 FM, De Brigj. The library also allocates $2,500 per year from its annual operating budget towards this program in order to cover production costs. Approximately 50 shows have been produced since the program was first launched in March 2010. This investment by the Ontario Trillium Foundation through MCS is further proof that the library is achieving its intended goal of reaching out to the low- German speaking community in Elgin County through this program and further builds upon the success that was acknowledged recently through the Minister's Award for Innovation. CONCLUSION: Staff recommend that the funds be accepted and that the Warden issue a letter of appreciation to MCS for this generous contribution. RECOMMENDATION: THAT Elgin County Library be authorized to accept a contribution of $10,000 from Mennonite Community Services, Aylmer to support expenses for the library's "Check It In, Check It Out" radio program into 2013; and, THAT the Warden issue a letter of appreciation to Mennonite Community Services, Aylmer in appreciation of this funding. All of which is Respectfully Submitted Approved for Submission Brian Masschaele Director of Community and Cultural Services 16 Mark G. McDonald Chief Administrative Officer Progressive by Nature REPORT TO COUNTY COUNCIL FROM: Clayton Watters, Director of Engineering Services DATE: March 5, 2012 SUBJECT: Ambulance Base Building Committee - Reactivation INTRODUCTION: At the November 23, 2003 County Council meeting, Council approved the creation of the Ambulance Base Building Committee for the Edward Street and Shawside Bases. The Committee was reactivated in 2007 for the Aylmer Base. This report seeks Council's approval to again reactivate this committee to begin planning the new Dutton Base (see attached letter from the Municipality of Dutton /Dunwich) and to request the appointment of members of Council to this committee. DISCUSSION: Included in the 2012 budget are monies for the design of the new base in the Dutton area and in 2013 monies are allocated for the construction of the new Dutton base. To commence the planning of this new base, approval for the reactivation of the Ambulance Base Building Committee is requested. Two members of County Council have expressed an interest in participating on this committee, the Mayor of Dutton /Dunwich and the Mayor of Southwold, with support from the Corporate Facilities Officer, the Director of Engineering Services and other member(s) of County Council that council sees fit. County Council will be requested to approve major details such as floor plans, building design and budget. The building process with responsibility and approval functions is outlined below: ® County Council sets and approves budget; ® County Council approves location; ® County Council approves floor plans and building design; ® Building Committee approves awarding contracts within County Purchasing Policy; ® Building Committee approves all change orders over $5,000. 17 It is envisioned that there would be close on -site supervision of the building by the Corporate Facilities Officer, Director of Engineering Services and staff from Thames EMS. Thames EMS, the Corporate Facilities Officer and Director of Engineering Services would have the on -site decision making authority as necessary. Also, the Committee would report to County Council periodically. CONCLUSION: To commence the planning for a new Dutton Base it is requested that Council approve the reactivation of the Ambulance Base Building Committee. The committee provides accountability and line of responsibility delegated by Council and would be comprised of two members from County Council supported by the Corporate Facilities Officer, Director of Engineering Services, Thames EMS and other Council member(s) if required by County Council. RECOMMENDATION: THAT Council approve the reactivation of the Ambulance Base Building Committee comprised of Councillors , the Corporate Facilities Officer, the Director of Engineering Services, and Thames EMS; and others that Council sees fit to serve; and also, THAT Council delegate the decision making authority to the Committee to build the Dutton Base within budget; and also, THAT the Building Committee report periodically to County Council. Respectfully Submitted Clayton Wafters Director, Engineering Services 18 Approved for Submission Mark G. McDonald Chief Administrative Officer MAYOR Cameron McWilliam 2874o Celtic Line, R. R. # 1 Dutton, NoL 1Jo DEPUTY MAYOR Bob Purcell 158 Shackleton Street Dutton, NoL IJo March 30, 2012 County of Elgin 450 Sunset Drive St. Thomas, On • N5R 5V1 9Kumapa rity of Dutton/Dun Box 329, 199 Currie Road, DUTTON, Ontario NoL iJo Telephone: (519) 762 -2204 Fax No. (519) 762 -2278 CIerk Administrator Ken Loveland Attention: Clayton Walters RE: Dutton Ambulance Facility COUNCILLORS Ian Fleck 272 Miller Road Box 542 Dutton, NoL iJo Donald H.Page 7949 Coyne Road R. R. Y Wallacetown, NoL aMo Dan McKillop 29094 Silver Clay Line, R.R. # 3 Dutton, NoL YJo Dear Mr. Walters: On behalf of the Council of the Municipality of Dutton Dunwich we would request that you take action to have a new ambulance base constructed by January 1, 2014. The Municipality has a use for the facility at that time. Ken Loveland Clerk Administrator KL:sc 19 REPORT TO COUNTY COUNCIL FROM: Clayton Watters, Director of Engineering Services DATE: March 5, 2012 SUBJECT: Emergency Services Response Time Performance Plan INTRODUCTION: Ontario Regulation 267/08 requires a performance plan respecting response times for all designated delivery agents. The response times are required for CTAS (Canadian Triage Acuity Scale) 1 to CTAS 5. These are defined in the attached appendix. The response times must be filed with the Ministry of Health and Long Term Care each year. This report examines call responses for 2010 and 2011 and recommends a performance plan for 2012. DISCUSSION: The Ontario government, through regulation 267/08, requires each delivery agent, to file a performance response plan by October 31 each year. The information required is as follows: • The percentage of times that a person equipped to provide any type of defibrillation has arrived on scene to provide defibrillation to sudden cardiac arrest patients within six minutes of the time notice has received, • The percentage of times that an ambulance crew has arrived on scene to provide ambulance services to sudden cardiac arrest patients categorized as CTAS 1 within eight minutes of the time of the notice is received respecting such services, • The percentage of times that an ambulance crew has arrived on scene to provide ambulance services to patients categorized as CTAS 2, 3, 4 and 5 within the response times targets set by the delivery agent under its plan. It is not the intent of the regulation for the performance plans to require additional resources or provide a rationale to reduce resources. The majority of the variables that influence response time performance are out of the control of the Elgin St. Thomas EMS. The variables of demand, deployment of resources, recording of response times, access to data, and emergency department off load delays are all actively considered. There remains little medical evidence to support any response time standard for other than 20 cardiac arrest patients. For the two years 2010 and 2011 there were 126 cardiac arrests (vital signs absent) and where resuscitation was required for patients within Elgin County or St. Thomas. If intervention is received within 4 minutes the patient has a great chance of a full recovery, after the 4 minutes the brain begins a rapid decline in functions. In order to provide a technical response to the Ministry, staff reviewed all the relevant information, sudden cardiac arrest for the last two years (2010 and 2011), within the designated area, the County of Elgin and the City of St. Thomas. There were 67 sudden cardiac arrest calls in 2010. The defibrillator was on scene under 6 minutes 49.3 % of the time. In 2011 there was 59 cardiac arrest calls. Due to limited cardiac arrest calls, the percentage could be significantly changed if more calls are distant from ambulance stations, from inclement weather or other time consuming factors. The defibrillator was on scene in under 6 minutes 54.5 % of the time. In the two year span 126 calls were completed for cardiac arrest calls. The defibrillator was on scene under 6 minutes, 51.6 % of the time. For sudden cardiac arrests staff recommend 45% of the time under 6 minutes. There were 112 calls for CTAS 1 in 2010. The paramedics arrived on scene under 8 minutes 67% of the time. In 2011 there were 122 calls and the paramedics arrived on scene under 8 minutes, 66.4% of the time. In the 2 year span 234 calls were made and paramedics arrived on scene in under 8 minutes, 66.7 % of the time. Due to limited CTAS 1 calls, the percentage could be significantly changed if more calls are distant from ambulance stations, from inclement weather or other time consuming factors. For CTAS 1, staff recommend that paramedics will arrive on scene in under 8 minutes 60% of the time. There were 3,601 calls for CTAS 2 in 2010 and 2011 and the paramedics arrived on scene under 10 minutes, 80% of the time. Statistically the response times should be greater than CTAS 1 time discussed above. A response time of 10 minutes is reasonable, due to distance from the stations and weather. For CTAS 2 staff recommend that paramedics arrive on scene in under 10 minutes 75% of the time. There were 5,177 calls for CTAS 3 in 2010 and 2011 and the paramedics arrived on scene under 10 minutes, 91.5% of the time. Presently, response times for all calls for the County and City is 14 minutes and 15 seconds. Given that the patient condition may be worse than described to the dispatcher, a prompt response time is appropriate. For CTAS 2 staff recommend 75% of the time in under 10 minutes. For CTAS 4 and 5 most of the cases a delay would have very little or no impact on the patients' condition with a high number of calls from a medical institution or a nursing home. It is reasonable to set the benchmark time at 20 minutes. A total of 3,749 calls were completed and with a response time of 20 minutes, 95% of the calls were completed. For CTAS 4 and 5 staff recommend 90% of the time under 20 minutes. 21 CONCLUSION: In order to comply with Regulation 267/08 staff reviewed all accident call records for 2010 and 2011. The information on cardiac arrest calls is the most supported by medical evidence. The response times recommended by staff, with input with Thames Emergency Services, are realistic and attainable. Caution should be exercised since the information that is available is of insufficient size to predict with accuracy the response times requested by the Province of Ontario. The response times could increase due to environmental factors outside the County of Elgin emergency medical service provider control, such as weather and distance to name a few. RECOMMENDATION: THAT the following Response Time Performance Plan for Elgin St. Thomas be forwarded to the Ministry of Health and Long Term Care. Respectfully Submitted Clayton Watters Director, Engineering Services 22 Approved for Submission Mark G. McDonald Chief Administrative Officer Target Response Time % Achieved Sudden Cardiac Arrest 6 minutes 45 CTAS 1 8 minutes 60 CTAS 2 10 minutes 75 CTAS 3 14 minutes 85 CTAS 4 20 minutes 90 CTAS 5 20 minutes 90 Respectfully Submitted Clayton Watters Director, Engineering Services 22 Approved for Submission Mark G. McDonald Chief Administrative Officer Definitions CTAS A tool to triage patients according to the type and severity of their signs and symptoms CTAS 1 Conditions that are threats to life or limb (or imminent of deterioration) requiring immediate aggressive interventions. Examples of the types of conditions that would be a Level 1 are: cardiac / respiratory arrest; major trauma; shock states; unconscious patients; and severe respiratory distress. CTAS 2 Conditions that are a potential threat to life or limb or function, requiring rapid medical intervention or delegated acts. Examples of types of conditions which would be a Level 2 are: altered mental states; head injury; severe trauma; neonates; myocardio infarction; overdose; and cardio vascular accident. CTAS 3 Conditions that could potentially progress to a serious problem requiring emergency intervention, may be associated with significant discomfort or affecting ability to function at work or activities of daily living. Examples of types of conditions which would be Level 3 are: moderate trauma; asthma; gastro - intestinal bleeding and pregnancy; acute psychosis and or suicidal thoughts; and acute pain. CTAS 4 Conditions that are related to patient age, distress, or potential for deterioration or complications would benefit from intervention or reassurance within 1 to 2 hours. Examples of types of conditions which would be a Level 4 are: headache; corneal foreign body; and chronic back pain. CTAS 5 Conditions that may be acute but non urgent as well as conditions which may be part of a chronic problem with or without evidence of deterioration. The investigation or interventions for some of those illnesses or injuries could be delayed or even referred to other areas of hospital or health care system. Examples of types of conditions which would be a Level 5 are: sore throat; urinary tract infection; mild abdominal pain which is chronic or reoccurring; Minor trauma, sore throat, minor symptoms. 23 REPORT TO COUNTY COUNCIL FROM: Clayton Watters, Director of Engineering Services DATE: March 5, 2012 SUBJECT: Ambulance Year End Report - 2011 INTRODUCTION: This report is a summary of the quarterly reports presented to county staff in relation to services provided by the County of Elgin's service provider, Thames Emergency Medical Services Incorporated. As a general statement, emergency medical services provide emergency care to stabilize a patient's condition, initiates rapid transport to hospitals and facilitates both emergency and non emergency transfers between medical facilities. The objectives of EMS are: all citizens should have equal access to ambulance services; ambulance services are an integrated part of the overall emergency health care services; the closest available and appropriate ambulance will respond to patient regardless of political, administrative and other artificial boundaries; ambulance service operators are medically, operational and financially accountable to provide service to the highest possible calibre and ambulance services must adapt to the changing health care, demographic, socio- economic and medical needs in their area. Thames Emergency Medical Services Incorporated is meeting the needs of the County of Elgin, the City of St. Thomas and the Province of Ontario. DISCUSSION: Semi annually, the County of Elgin's service provider for emergency services, Thames Emergency Medical Services (TEMS), provides a written report on the performance in a number of key measures. The information used by TEMS to measure key performance indicators, originates from the Province of Ontario. It is widely known that the data has errors, TEMS does make changes to obvious errors but cleaning up the entire year is an enormous staff time commitment. Other jurisdictions have from time to time reviewed the data and have found there was approximately a 20% error rate. That being said, the following are important statistics that can be used as comparables on a yearly basis. 24 Annual Total Call Volumes (Codes 1 — 4 and 8): The annual total calls give a big picture of the growth in the number of calls. Generally, the calls remained static from 2007 until 2009 at around 11,850. In 2010 there was an increase in calls of 13.6% and a 13.4% increase in 2011. The two year increase was 29 %. The cross border caIIS remained static at approximately 625 or 4% of the total calls. Appendix A lists all stations and their calls for the last five years. Other Municipalities made pickups in the County of Elgin: Bruce (36); Chatham Kent (4); Grey (26); Huron (2); Middlesex (239); Norfolk (4); Oneida (86); Oxford (188); and Perth (1). Data is not available for years 2006 to 2007 for other municipalities providing service within the County of Elgin or the City of St. Thomas. It should be noted that the Elgin County EMS contractor made the following pickups within the following municipalities: Chatham Kent (14); Chippewa (2); Oneida (3); Oxford (2); and Middlesex (91). Call volumes for Code 3 (Prompt) and 4 (Urgent) by municipality in 2011: Municipality 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 All Stations 11,874 12,091 11,713 13,309 15,098 The annual total calls give a big picture of the growth in the number of calls. Generally, the calls remained static from 2007 until 2009 at around 11,850. In 2010 there was an increase in calls of 13.6% and a 13.4% increase in 2011. The two year increase was 29 %. The cross border caIIS remained static at approximately 625 or 4% of the total calls. Appendix A lists all stations and their calls for the last five years. Other Municipalities made pickups in the County of Elgin: Bruce (36); Chatham Kent (4); Grey (26); Huron (2); Middlesex (239); Norfolk (4); Oneida (86); Oxford (188); and Perth (1). Data is not available for years 2006 to 2007 for other municipalities providing service within the County of Elgin or the City of St. Thomas. It should be noted that the Elgin County EMS contractor made the following pickups within the following municipalities: Chatham Kent (14); Chippewa (2); Oneida (3); Oxford (2); and Middlesex (91). Call volumes for Code 3 (Prompt) and 4 (Urgent) by municipality in 2011: Municipality # of Calls Population Calls per 1,000 pop Aylmer 699 7,249 96 Bayham 307 6,989 44 Central Elgin 898 12,743 71 Dutton - Dunwich 299 3,876 77 Malahide 417 9,146 46 Southwold 384 4,494 85 West Elgin 433 5,157 84 Sub- total 3,437 49,654 69 St. Thomas 3,711 37,905 98 Total 7,148 87,559 82 The above chart is specific only to the Code 3 and Code 4 calls within the geographical borders of each municipality. The above chart is a depiction of the calls in each municipality which is normalized (per population density). Bayham (lowest) has 44 calls per 1,000 population while Aylmer (highest) has 96 calls per 1,000 population. The average within the County was 69 calls per 1,000, while in the City there were 98 calls per 1,000 population. Chute Time, time from crew being paged, to vehicle en -route to destination (T2 — T3): Codes 1 and 2 (non- emergency), maximum 3 minutes 90% of the time, 2011 statistic, 82.1 %. 25 Codes 3 and 8 (prompt call or standby call), maximum 2 minutes 90% of the time, 2011 statistic, Code 3, 98.8% and Code 8, 97.1%. Code 4 (urgent call), maximum 1.5 minutes 90% of the time, 2011 statistic, 94.9 %. The most important response is for the urgent call (Code 4) and TEMS does meet the benchmark more than 95% of the time. Response Time, time from crew being paged, to vehicle arriving at destination (T2 - T4) for individual municipalities: Municipality 2009 2010 2011 Aylmer 6.60 6.58 6.87 Bayham 23.90 23.55 24.42 Central Elgin 13.47 14.12 13.52 Dutton Dunwich 13.05 14.10 14.27 Malahide 13.83 14.90 15.15 Southwold 15.13 15.68 15.02 West Elgin 11.92 13.22 12.80 St. Thomas 7.22 7.76 7.53 There are four areas where the response times are greater than the provincial standard response times of 14.25 minutes (Bayham, Dutton /Dunwich, Malahide and Southwold). Staff is monitoring the situation. Since the present service is exceeding the response times mandated by the Ministry of Health and Long Term Care, Council should resist the temptation to solve an individual situation given that the change will inevitably have a major financial implication in the future in other areas within the County. Response Time, overall: For code 4 calls the response time is mandated for Elgin County at 14.25 minutes (14 minutes 15 seconds, in 2011 the response time was 12.53 minutes (12 minutes 32 seconds). The 14.25 minutes was established in 1996 by the province and was not based on any scientific evidence but is simply a historical number, of the 90 percentile for the year 1996. Year Response time minutes for County and City of St. Thomas 2005 13.41 2006 13.25 2007 12.28 2008 12.19 2009 12.20 2010 12.53 2011 12.55 26 TEMS provides a 19% faster service than what is required by the province. But, the response times have been slightly increasing in the last two years. Staff is monitoring the situation to determine if the trend is an anomaly or will increase for various factors beyond Thames EMS control. The County of Elgin will be implementing a response time standards (see report - Response Time Performance Plan dated March 5, 2012), and report the findings to the Ministry of Health and County Council starting for the 2012. Station Utilization: The station utilization is an indicator used to illustrate the ambulance activity at a specific location. If the utilization factor is nearing the 40% range this will signify a review of the call volumes to determine if a change is required at that location. The time for an ambulance to be cleared from the hospital is 57 minutes and staff has estimated an additional 13 minutes to return to the base, clean and restock the vehicle. Therefore the total estimated time per call was set at 1 hour and 10 minutes or 1.17 hours The following chart illustrates the overall utilization per station ( %) for the last five years. Stations 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 St. Thomas - Edward Street 36 % 36 % 38 % 45 % 46 St. Thomas - Shaw Valley 40 % 40 % 38 % 38 % 38 Aylmer 18% 19% 22% 17% 17% Dutton 24 % 21 % 22 % 32 % 50 Rodney 22 % 19 % 11 % 15 % 20 % Total 29 % 29 % 28 % 24 % 37 Dutton and Edward Street have a high utilization rate of 50% and 46 % respectively but once the Code 8 calls are removed (45% of the calls) the utilization rate declines to 26 and 25 %. The utilization rates are within a reasonable range. As a background Edward Street has one 24 hour shift and one 12 hour shift each day and the Aylmer, Shaw Valley, Dutton and Rodney have one 24 hour shift. Public Relations: TEMS attended 43 events and spent 181 hours at those events. The events included: educational awareness; school visits (daycares, public schools and colleges); funerals; emergency services open houses and ceremonies to name a few. Public relations are a very important component for this service as it ties the community to the service on a non life threatening manner. 27 CONCLUSION: Thames Emergency Medical Services Incorporated is exceeding the Ministry response time standards of the residents of the County of Elgin. TEMS service for Code 4 is better than mandated, which is a critical industry benchmark. Simply stated the objectives are: accessible; integrated; seamlessness; accountable; and responsive. Thames EMS provides services that exceed those objectives. RECOMMENDATION: THAT this report be forwarded to the City of St. Thomas for their records; and also, THAT this report "Ambulance Year End Report — 2011" dated March 4, 2012 be received and filed. Respectfully Submitted Approved for Submission Clayton Watters Mark G. McDonald Director, Engineering Services Chief Administrative Officer 28 Definitions Code The response priority as determined by the call taker at the time of the initial call receipt, or as updated from subsequently learned information, as well as the transport priority as determined by the attending emergency medical attendants / paramedics. Code 0 Administrative / other: movement of vehicle for any non patient reason other than covered by codes 7, 8 and 9 Code 1 Deferrable call: a non emergency call which may be delayed without being physically detrimental to the patient. Code 2 Scheduled call: a non emergency call which must be done at a specific time due to limited availability of special treatment or diagnostic / receiving facilities. Such scheduling is not done because of patient preference or convenience. Code 3 Prompt call: an emergency call which may be responded with moderate delay. The patient is stable or under professional care and not in immediate danger. Code 4 Urgent call: An emergency call requiring immediate response. The patient is life, limb, or function threatened, in immediate danger and time is critical. Code 5 Obviously dead: The patient is unmistakably dead but has not been pronounced dead so by a physician. Code 6 Legally dead person: The patient has been pronounced dead by a physician. Code 7 Down staffed vehicle: A regularly scheduled vehicle is available for a call, but one or more staff is unavailable such as due to illness or delayed driving to work. Code 8 Standby call: Vehicle or ambulance crew utilization to provide emergency coverage or for anticipation of a call. Code 9 Maintenance call: a vehicle is either out of service for maintenance at base or is sent to the garage for servicing. Time 0 Time when the ambulance communication officer initially answers the telephone to commence call taking. Time 1 Call received / committed: time at which the ambulance communications officer has elicited sufficient address and problem / nature information from the caller to be able to code and commit the request for service to be assigned an ambulance resource. Time 2 Crew notified: time at which the ambulance communications officer has completed selecting which ambulance resource to assign and provided the ambulance crew with response code and sufficient call location information (by base page, radio, telephone, belt page, PDA) to begin responding. Time 3 Crew mobilization: time at which the ambulance crew advises the ambulance communication officer (by radio or status messaging) that they are mobile and proceeding to the calls location. Time 4 Arrived scene: time at which the ambulance crew advises the ambulance communications officer (by radio or status messaging) that they have arrived at the calls location. Time 5 Departed scene: time at which the ambulance crew advises the ambulance communications officer (by radio or status messaging) that they have left 29 30 the calls location. Time 6 Arrived destination: time at which ambulance crew advices the ambulance communications officer (by radio or status messaging) that they have arrived at the destination location. Time 7 Departed destination: time at which ambulance crew advises the ambulance communications officer (by radio or status messaging) that they have departed from the destination location. Time 8 Returned to base: time at which the ambulance crew advises the ambulance communications officer (by radio or status messaging) that they have arrived back at the base. Time 9 Emergency department notified: time at which ambulance communications officer advises the hospitals emergency room staff of an incoming ambulance patient. Time 10 Police service notified / tiered: Time at which the ambulance communications officer notifies the police service of a call requiring police assistance and / or a call that meets the tiered response criteria for police assistance Time 11 Call information completed: time at which the ambulance communications officer disengages from the caller after having completed pre -alert and tiered response notifications, collection of geographic and patient information and provisions of pre - arrival instructions. Time 12 Crew updated: time at which the ambulance communications officer completes providing the ambulance crew with additional information or verification of original information. Time 13 Pre - empted / cancelled: time at which ambulance communication officer has advised the ambulance crew that the assignment has been cancelled for one of the seven incomplete call reasons (i.e. cancelled by double dispatching to a closer unit under the control of another communications centre; cancelled by doctor; cancelled by police / fire; patient refused transport; other such as patient travelled by private car or no patient at the scene; higher priority call; and cancelled by reason of death). Time Fire service notified / tiered: time at which the ambulance communications officer notifies the fire service of a call requiring fire assistance and / or a call that meets tiered response criteria for fire assistance. Response Time Time elapsed between Time 2 and Time 4. Reaction Time Time elapsed between Time 2 and Time 3. 30 Appendix A Total CaII Volumes Stations 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 St. Thomas - Edward Street 4,068 4,006 4,227 5,009 5,185 St. Thomas - Shaw Valley 2,973 3,011 2,853 2,824 2,874 Aylmer 1,338 1,445 1,656 1,237 1,274 Dutton 1,771 1,568 1,660 2,361 3,709 Rodney 1,634 1,382 810 1,084 1,470 Other Municipalities 679 507 794 586 Total 11,784 12,091 11,713 13,309 15,098 31 REPORT TO COUNTY COUNCIL FROM: Clayton Watters, Director of Engineering Services DATE: March 5, 2012 SUBJECT: Emergency Medical Services - Bayham INTRODUCTION: The County Councillor from the Municipality of Bayham requested staff to review the service provided within Bayham and recommend improvements to the service in order to reduce the response times to the municipality. This report will discuss the present standards for the County of Elgin and the Municipality of Bayham and also methods to improve response times. DISCUSSION: The County of Elgin is the Designated Delivery Agent for emergency medical services for the County of Elgin and the City of St. Thomas. As such the County of Elgin has the full responsibility to manage the system within the County and City. An integral part of this discussion is that other service designated delivery agents (DDA) provide service within the County of Elgin and City of St. Thomas. In 2011 other DDA completed 586 calls within Elgin County and the City of St. Thomas and 120 of those calls were completed by Oxford County (Tillsonburg station) within the Municipality of Bayham. Presently, the response time standard within the County and City is for the paramedics to arrive at the scene within 14.25 minutes (14 minutes 15 seconds) 90% of the time for Code 4 calls. Additionally, the response time does not stipulate for individual areas within the County or City, such as Luton or Iona. Since providing the service the County of Elgin has always met the response time requirements of 14 minutes and 15 seconds. In summary, since the County is meeting the present response time standards of 14 minutes and 15 seconds there is no requirements to make any changes, such as additional staff or stations. That being said, the request was for service improvements to the Municipality of Bayham area. The chart below lists the response times for each municipality / township for the last three years. 32 Response Time Municipality 2009 2010 2011 Aylmer 6.60 6.58 6.87 Bayham 23.90 23.55 24.42 Central Elgin 13.47 14.12 13.52 Dutton Dunwich 13.05 14.10 14.27 Malahide 13.83 14.90 15.15 Southwold 15.13 15.68 15.02 West Elgin 11.92 13.22 12.80 St. Thomas 7.22 7.76 7.53 Overall for DDA 12.20 12.53 12.55 Mandated 14.25 14.25 14.25 The times greater than 14.25 minutes are bolded. In 2011 there are four municipalities / townships were the response times are greater than the provincial standard response times of 14.25 minutes (Bayham, Dutton /Dunwich, Malahide and Southwold). Generally in the last three years all the response times have marginally increased. The increase in response time is usually related to weather and distance. It should be noted that all Designated Delivery Agents will have a response time performance plan that replaces the 14.25 minutes that has been in existence since 1996. A separate report titled "Emergency Services Response Time Performance Plan" - dated March 5, 2012 provides further details. Below is general information that should be considered during this discussion. Response time is an important parameter for patients that are in need of medical assistance. There is little medical evidence to support improved patient outcomes resulting from shorter ambulance times. The principle argument for shorter response times is cardiac arrest survivability however the best outcomes are found in early detection, early CPR and early defibrillation. Stroke, STEMI and trauma have longer windows of 90 minutes or more between the onset of the event to in- hospital intervention. A review of the Code 4 calls per hour indicated that from 7 am to 3 pm would address 40% Of the calls. From 7 am to 5 pm would address 50% of the calls. From 7 am to 7 pm would address 63 % of the calls. So if additional service is endorsed by the County a staff would recommend a 12 hour shift from 7 am till 7 pm. If additional service is provided to Bayham the costs are made up of several components. The approximately costs include: vehicle; paramedic(s); consumables; buildings; and others. A vehicle operating cost is $15,000, vehicle amortization cost is $40,000, one paramedic shift is $275,000, consumables is $5,000, building operating and capital cost is $65,000, defibrillator amortization is $5,000 and other costs are $10,000. The cost for the paramedic includes 12 working hours per day and 365 days per week or 4,380 worked hours. A paramedic averages 42 hours per week and with holidays and sick time, approximately 2.5 paramedics are required to cover the one shift. 33 That being written the following are options to improve the response times for the Municipality of Bayham. Option 1. Seek improvements to Time 3, time paramedics must be mobilized. This would have minor improvements such as 10 to 15 seconds per call. No cost for this option. Option 2. Move ambulance from the Aylmer station easterly to the Talbot Line and Heritage Line area. An ambulance should be located that services the greatest number of patients. In 2011 Aylmer had 722 calls and Bayham had 307 calls (Code 8 calls excluded). Moving the ambulance from Aylmer easterly would have positive affect for Bayham but negatively affect Aylmer and Malahide. There are situations were ambulances are moved from the station due to an increase in calls from other areas. So, if the Aylmer station was on a call, the St. Thomas station(s) would relocate one vehicle to New Sarum. If St Thomas was down two vehicles, Aylmer would relocate to new Sarum and Dutton would relocate to Shedden. If St. Thomas was down three vehicles then, Aylmer would relocate to New Sarum, Rodney would relocate to West Lorne and Dutton would relocate to Shedden. In other words due to the seamless nature of the business and the other designated delivery agents (Oxford station in Tillsonburg), even if a vehicle was located in Straffordville the vehicle would be relocated if there was a series of calls within other municipalities. No cost for this option. Option 3. One paramedic (12 hours) with an emergency response vehicle at a mobile location Having one paramedic and vehicle located in Straffordville would assist patients and provide an earlier response but that paramedic could only control the patient until a vehicle with two paramedics arrived at the scene to transport to the nearest medical facility. The estimated cost is $340,000. Option 4. Two paramedics (12 hours) with an ambulance at a mobile location, Two paramedics and a vehicle located in Straffordville would be able to treat patients and also transport to medical facility. The estimated cost is $625,000. Option 5. Two paramedics (12 hours) with an ambulance at a permanent station, Two paramedics and a vehicle located in Straffordville would be able to assist patients and also transport to medical facility. The estimated cost is $690,000. Option 6. Two paramedics (24 hours) with an ambulance at a permanent station. Two paramedics and a vehicle located in Straffordville would be able to assist patients and transport to medical facility. The estimated cost is $1,240,000. 34 Since the present service is exceeding the response times mandated by the Ministry of Health and Long Term Care, Council should resist the temptation to solve an individual situation given that the change will inevitably have a major financial implication in the future in other areas within the County. CONCLUSION: The emergency medical services provided to the residents of the County of Elgin and the City of St. Thomas exceeds the response time criteria mandated by the province of 14 minutes and 15 seconds (14.25 minutes) 90% of the time by 12 %. As such no additional resources (staff, rolling stock or building) is required or contemplated at this time. Staff however, are constantly reviewing data to ensure resources meet or exceed standards and if a change is required then Council will be informed. RECOMMENDATION: THAT this report "Emergency Medical Services — Bayham" dated March 5, 2012 be received and filed. Respectfully Submitted Clayton Watters Director, Engineering Services 35 Approved for Submission Mark G. McDonald Chief Administrative Officer Definitions Code The response priority as determined by the call taker at the time of the initial call receipt, or as updated from subsequently learned information, as well as the transport priority as determined by the attending emergency medical attendants / paramedics. Code 0 Administrative / other: movement of vehicle for any non patient reason other than covered by codes 7, 8 and 9 Code 1 Deferrable call: a non emergency call which may be delayed without being physically detrimental to the patient. Code 2 Scheduled call: a non emergency call which must be done at a specific time due to limited availability of special treatment or diagnostic / receiving facilities. Such scheduling is not done because of patient preference or convenience. Code 3 Prompt call: an emergency call which may be responded with moderate delay. The patient is stable or under professional care and not in immediate danger. Code 4 Urgent call: An emergency call requiring immediate response. The patient is life, limb, or function threatened, in immediate danger and time is critical. Code 5 Obviously dead: The patient is unmistakably dead but has not been pronounced dead so by a physician. Code 6 Legally dead person: The patient has been pronounced dead by a physician. Code 7 Down staffed vehicle: A regularly scheduled vehicle is available for a call, but one or more staff is unavailable such as due to illness or delayed driving to work. Code 8 Standby call: Vehicle or ambulance crew utilization to provide emergency coverage or for anticipation of a call. Code 9 Maintenance call: a vehicle is either out of service for maintenance at base or is sent to the garage for servicing. Time 0 Time when the ambulance communication officer initially answers the telephone to commence call taking. Time 1 Call received / committed: time at which the ambulance communications officer has elicited sufficient address and problem / nature information from the caller to be able to code and commit the request for service to be assigned an ambulance resource. Time 2 Crew notified: time at which the ambulance communications officer has completed selecting which ambulance resource to assign and provided the ambulance crew with response code and sufficient call location information (by base page, radio, telephone, belt page, PDA) to begin responding. Time 3 Crew mobilization: time at which the ambulance crew advises the ambulance communication officer (by radio or status messaging) that they are mobile and proceeding to the calls location. Time 4 Arrived scene: time at which the ambulance crew advises the ambulance communications officer (by radio or status messaging) that they have arrived at the calls location. Time 5 Departed scene: time at which the ambulance crew advises the ambulance communications officer (by radio or status messaging) that they have left 36 37 the calls location. Time 6 Arrived destination: time at which ambulance crew advices the ambulance communications officer (by radio or status messaging) that they have arrived at the destination location. Time 7 Departed destination: time at which ambulance crew advises the ambulance communications officer (by radio or status messaging) that they have departed from the destination location. Time 8 Returned to base: time at which the ambulance crew advises the ambulance communications officer (by radio or status messaging) that they have arrived back at the base. Time 9 Emergency department notified: time at which ambulance communications officer advises the hospitals emergency room staff of an incoming ambulance patient. Time 10 Police service notified / tiered: Time at which the ambulance communications officer notifies the police service of a call requiring police assistance and / or a call that meets the tiered response criteria for police assistance Time 11 Call information completed: time at which the ambulance communications officer disengages from the caller after having completed pre -alert and tiered response notifications, collection of geographic and patient information and provisions of pre - arrival instructions. Time 12 Crew updated: time at which the ambulance communications officer completes providing the ambulance crew with additional information or verification of original information. Time 13 Pre - empted / cancelled: time at which ambulance communication officer has advised the ambulance crew that the assignment has been cancelled for one of the seven incomplete call reasons (i.e. cancelled by double dispatching to a closer unit under the control of another communications centre; cancelled by doctor; cancelled by police / fire; patient refused transport; other such as patient travelled by private car or no patient at the scene; higher priority call; and cancelled by reason of death). Time Fire service notified / tiered: time at which the ambulance communications officer notifies the fire service of a call requiring fire assistance and / or a call that meets tiered response criteria for fire assistance. Response Time Time elapsed between Time 2 and Time 4. Reaction Time Time elapsed between Time 2 and Time 3. 37 REPORT TO COUNTY COUNCIL FROM: Peter Dutchak, Deputy Director of Engineering Services Sonia Beavers, Purchasing Coordinator DATE: March 27, 2012 SUBJECT: Signage Removal and Installation INTRODUCTION: As part of the approved 2012 Capital Budget, a quotation was advertised as per the County's Procurement Policy and submissions were received until Tuesday, March 20, 2012 for the Signage Removal and Installation, Contract No. 6200 -12- 10 (A). DISCUSSION: Three companies submitted bids for the Signage Removal and Installation Quotation. The submitted bids are as follows: COMPANY TENDER BID (exclusive of H.S.T.) Sparta Tree (1640313 Ont. Inc.) $117,625.00 Gary D. Robinson Contracting Limited $132,250.00 Laemers Excavating $350,625.00 Sparta Tree submitted the lowest bid for the Signage Removal and Installation Quotation at a total price of $117,625.00 exclusive of H.S.T. The lowest submitted bid is within budget estimates. As per the County of Elgin's Purchasing Policy, if change orders are required and the cost increases above the tender amount approved by Council by less than 10 %, and the amount is within the overall budgeted project amount, work will proceed upon authorization by the Director. However, if the cost increases above the tender amount approved by Council by more than 10 %, the Director will prepare a further report to Council outlining the expenditures. RECOMMENDATION THAT Sparta Tree (1640313 Ont. Inc.) be selected for the Signage Removal and Installation, Contract No. 6200 -12 -10 (A) at a total price of $117,625.00 exclusive of H.S.T. and, 38 THAT if the cost increases above the tender amount approved by Council by more than 10 %, the Director will prepare a further report to Council outlining the expenditures. All of which is Respectfully Submitted; Peter Dutchak Deputy Director of Engineering Services Sonia Beavers Purchasing Coordinator Clayton Watters Director of Engineering Services 39 Approved for Submission; Mark G. McDonald Chief Administrative Officer REPORT TO COUNCIL FROM: Jim Bundschuh - Director of Financial Services DATE: April 2nd, 2012 SUBJECT: 2012 Proposed Budget INTRODUCTION: On February 21S1 Council approved a budget in principal that included a special hospital levy of 2.1% and the first phase of the grant worth $0.5 million to be paid in 2012. With the recent provincial budget and the uncertainty surrounding the re- scoped hospital project, the City /County Hospital Committee recommended the hospital donation decision be deferred to a future budget deliberation, once the revised scope of the project is understood. A further change is a reduction in costs for social services, as approved by St. Thomas City Council, of $81 thousand. This report contains the budget presented on February 21St, revised to reduce social service costs, and remove the hospital special levy and donation. A further $167 thousand has been added to the hospital donation reserve to demonstrate the County's continued commitment to this project. DISCUSSION: In 2009 and 2010, the County achieved a total of $1.8 million in annual efficiencies. Despite these significant operational improvements, the County was faced with potential double digit tax increases in 2011 as a result of a loss of revenue from OMPF (Ontario Municipal Partnership Fund - $3 million annually) and Ford property tax (up to $0.7 million annually). In response, a ten year plan was developed to address this challenge, driven by Council's strategic direction, which included the moderate use of reserves, maintaining service levels and moderating the effect on local taxes. The resulting plan included 4% annual tax increases bringing revenue back in line with cost by 2016. The 2011 performance to budget of $1.4 million surplus is being applied in 2012 to reduce the impact on the ratepayer. In addition, $1 million in Capital Spending surpluses was used to fund unexpected road slope failures on Plank Road and Calton Line. Once again, the 2012 budget includes $0.4 million in operational efficiencies. These improvements are allowing the County to absorb the ever - increasing legislative requirements (e.g. accessibility and levels of care) and to make further strategic investments in economic development to support local business (Aylmer EBRC). As a result of these various actions, County residents will see a slight reduction in the 2012 tax rate. The 2012 proposed budget is presented to Council with a levy increase on the average household of 4% totalling $1.1 million. The tax increase is the predominate contributor in reducing the 2011 budgeted loss of $3.9 million to $2.6 million for 2012. The 2012 tax will equate to a 0.6% decrease in the property tax rate. An average home that had no change in assessed value would see an $8 decrease in County taxes, and a more typical home would see a 4% increase equal to $50. 40 Attachment I Schedule A outlines the tax ratios which remain unchanged from prior years. Schedule B summarizes the budget request by department. Schedule C provides the tax rates. The causal factors driving changes in the 2012 budget from 2011 levels are found in Attachment 11 and are summarized as follows: • 2011 budget planned for a net loss (expenses in excess of revenue) of $3.9 million (line 1). The 2012 budget is a net loss of $2.6 million (line 31); an improvement of $1.3 million compared to the 2011 approved budget. This net loss will be funded by reserves resulting in a reduction of municipal position. • The special one -time tax increase (line 30b) for the hospital redevelopment and the associated donation to the hospital (line 10) have been deferred until a later date, but a further $167 thousand is being contributed to the hospital reserve in 2012. Since the scope of the project is unknown at this time, no amounts have been included in the plan for future years. • Inflation (lines 11 -14) contributes a further net $0.7 million in cost increases. • OMPF funding (lines 2) is resulting in a $0.6 million loss in revenue. • County staff have continued to improve the efficiencies of the operation with a commitment of $0.4 million for 2012 (line 27). The 2012 Capital Budget of $9,011,000 is found in Attachment III. The 2012 Balance Sheet and Reserves Budget found in Attachment IV shows a 2012 Ending Municipal Position of $186.0 million (line C), down by the budgeted $2.6 million negative net income. Attachment V contains the 2012 Grants of $66,248. CONCLUSION: The attached budget is resulting in a $2.6 million reduction in the Municipal Position and a corresponding reduction in Reserves contained within the Municipal Position. A primary purpose of reserves is to soften the impact of external shocks to the rate payers. Given that the cumulative annual impact of a loss of $3 million in OMPF funding and the loss of Ford tax revenue potentially growing to $0.7 million annually, the next five year period will require the use of Reserves. Measured increases (4% annually) in residential taxes proposed in the first nine years of the ten year plan will bring Net Income back to a favourable position. Subsequently, tax increases will be reduced to the rate of inflation. RECOMMENDATION: THAT the 2012 Proposed Budget, which includes the Operating Budget, the Capital Budget and Grants be approved; and THAT the 2012 Tax Rates and Ratios in Attachment I be approved; and THAT the necessary by -law be prepared. Respectfully Submitted Jim Bundschuh Director of Financial Services Approved for Submission Mark G. McDonald Chief Administrative Officer 41 COUNTY OF ELGIN By -Law 12 -09 SCHEDULE A Ratios PROPERTY CLASS 2012 2011 Attachment 1 RESIDENTIAL /FARM 1.0000 1.0000 MULTI - RESIDENTIAL 2.3458 2.3458 FARMLAND AWAITING DEVELOPMENT - RESIDENTIAL 0.5000 0.5000 COMMERCIAL OCCUPIED 1.6376 1.6376 COMMERCIAL VACANT LAND 1.1463 1.1463 INDUSTRIAL OCCUPIED 2.2251 2.2251 INDUSTRIAL VACANT LAND 1.4463 1.4463 LARGE INDUSTRIAL OCCUPIED 2.8318 2.8318 LARGE INDUSTRIAL VACANT 1.8407 1.8407 PIPELINES 1.1446 1.1446 FARM 0.2500 0.2500 MANAGED FORESTS 0.2500 0.2500 42 Attachment 1 V O 6) N CO N- O d O ( ) co I N O 0 O 0 O U) O) D 7 m O) • 0 O m • E N E N a) O CO U) 'U LL U) O) 0 7 m 0 U) N O Q O d O C N E Q O U) U) 0 U) O) 0 7 m U) O LL > C > O J E O O E 0 a) Levy Increase Net Income Attachment 1 COUNTY OF ELGIN By -Law 12 -09 SCHEDULE C t0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c E cfl�..—rncn�..—rnaocvcn..— CO V) 6 M 6.— M N 4 M O 6 N 4 L co co U N °a Cl) 000000000000 �, O co co co co co co co co co co co co O O O O O O O O O O O as < O O O O O O O O O O O O _ X o < W N O Si"1 N N X O "'o r- 00 CO 00 (:) C) Co co W H a o� N X PROPERTY CLASS 0.575531 % RESIDENTIAL 1.350081% MULTI - RESIDENTIAL 0.287766% FARMLAND AWAITING DEVELOPMENT - RESIDENTIAL 0.936840% 0.942490% COMMERCIAL OCCUPIED 0.655776% 0.659732% COMMERCIAL VACANT LAND 1.272937% 1.280615% INDUSTRIAL OCCUPIED 0.827401 % 0.832391 % 1.620019% 1.629790% 1.053029% 1.059381% 0.654804% 0.658753% 0 0 O O N N O O O O 0.143883% 0.143883% c a) Q E O N N Q Q) CD V) CD C L CO (0 (0 a) CO +-' a O a) •5 u U a) (0 _a Q O CO a) E 2 .0 L a) X /Q . N Q LL Z rte+ 0 Q U U c ai. J U CO a O a) 0 zJJ i E a) Q U -- U) a) L Q I Et 2 Q Q Q Q 0 I— x as c0 a) (n Q SO- Ct Z Z W W c 0 5W Wz C0 o vN) Q' J Q z J J d LaL Q N O Attachment 11 2012 Ten Year Business Plan CV O N CO M O O O O V a0 N- O O O O _ O V O CO O 0 ,— o 0 O O N V CO W O) 202.5 o O O O O) U3 O N O N co N ,- O O O ,- V CO I� O O O O (i-' O V O (O O `-' CO. ,— o 0 O O (O M I� V O) 198.3 M O N O M `-' U3 N O) U3 0) O N M O O 0 N O O O 'Cr CO I� O O O O O V O (O O In ,— . o 0 O O (O N N O I� V O) CO In co (O O `-- EA .7 O) d3 CO V M O O ,- 0 N,- O O O V CO I� O O O O O N N 7 V O N M `-' V ,— 0 '64:2 O O W. — L° O O) 7 N O) 7 O) - O — d3 (O O) d3 n N co N O O N O O V CO I� O O O O 0 N to N 0 O O N 0 CO O O Q O In O `-' M ,— 0 '64:2 O O V co I. CO LO O CO (O a CO - O) r U3 CO O) d3 co O N O O O 0 CO O O V CO I� O O O O O N O O V O .— M .— 0 0 O O (O N In V 00 r n 00 V In 00 r n U3 O O N U3 to O N CO O _ V O O O O M O O 7 M I� CO O O O O O V O 00 O co. ,— 0 0 O O O co V W 184.5 00 N 00 ..— I: U3 O In d3 ct N 00 O O O O ,— 0 00 O O O ,— M I- M O O O O O O V O O `-' N .— 0 0 O O co O `-' N If) 00 co V 00 In N 00 N U3 O n d3 co O N Co' N O O O In O N CO O O O O M M I� CO O O O O 7 O , V O CO O 7 ,— 0 0 O O V O CO O 0 (O W 185.2 CO M 00 CO EA d3 Oil O N M M N co C M ,— O O O O O,— O O MMI�(O WO 0 0 0 0 0 ,- O - 0 0 — 0 M 0 0 M O ,- V O O N O 00 O O V O (O N I� W W O (O 00 38) Prior Business Plan 185.3 te w G) 0 O V Explanation 2) OMPF 3) Social Service Prov. Upload 4) Soc. Serv. Caseload &Cost /Case impac 5) 99 Edward St. /Public Health 6) Adjustment for Tax Appeals /Write -Offs 7) Payment -In -Lieu Toronto Greelane Pro' 8) Interest 9) Legal Disputes 10) Hospital Donation 11) Benefits 12) Wage Inflation 13) Supplies Inflation 14) Revenue Increases 15) Loss of Road Infrastructure Funding 16) Capitalization of Software 17) Accessability Coordinator 18) Karen St. Pumping Station 20) Planning Consultant Costs 23b) Terrace Lodge Rebuild Prov. Grant 23c) Admin Building Space Needs 23d) Accessibility /Museum Grants 30b) Residential Household Increase 30b) Hospital Special Levy 137) Ending Muncipal Position Attachment III cts a z c1 >_ J, O W LL O E z N U O N 0 Q O L a 2012 -2021 Average ' O O O i co O O "10 10 ' n Tr O N M O N M O T ' 0000 0000 ' O N O N ' CO CD — N h — N 0 0 0 0 0 0 O N h T — 0— — N N 000 000 ' O M M' CD � — CO O N 0 0 T co- M 10 N- ' ' ' h — N M M M O CO ' O T — O O ' O M M O O ' ' 13,564,230 2017 -2021 Total ' o O 0 - O O 0 L() in N CO - LC) CO CO N LO O O O O 0 0 0 0 0000 - - - - O O LC) LC) LO 0 I� N O CO r N— N— O O O 0 0 0 000 - - - 0 0 0 LO LO 0 N- O O O 0 0 0 000 - - - 0 0 0 LO 0 LO O O .— .— O 0 0 - LC) I� LO M ' co CO - 0 a0 r .— O 0 CO 0 O 0 0 - O CO r N— ' 66,291,238 2012 -2016 Total ' O O O O co co O O ' ' O ' N. n � 0 O O el M T M ' 0000 0000 '0000 ' O N 0 'Ai c T� O M N �� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i O H O h N T M M NN 000 000 '000' 0 O M M 03 CD r 00 T 0 0 O T h N ' ' ' O CD I 0 N 1 10_ O O 1 0 T T T O O 0 O CD CO O O 0 ' 69,351,060 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 100,000 750,000 - - - 30,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 724,000 425,000 7,025,000 7,025,000 5,125,000 754,000 435,000 7,035,000 7,035,000 5,135,000 292,800 167,300 167,300 204,800 167,300 9,010,731 9,800,572 16, 858, 353 16, 616, 093 17, 065, 311 Capital Projects 1) Corporate 2) Administrative Building 0 J w C W E M O a)) a) U c-0 0 • o c a) a) a a N o rn 0) d d c .c o',f d) ', 'a c) 0) 3 5 c c Z m .N 'a a) (1) 3 .5 o) o) Z m O O O a) J J O 0 °) a) a) o a) i a) D D J O O H H a) m m U N Es n H . _ := m -v vv � - 0 V a) E 0 2 7) Information Technology 8) Ambul. & Emergency Meas. 9) Econ.Dev'I, Tourism & Plan. 10) Elgin County Prior Year's Business Plan 2012 -2020 Spend New Plan Average Capital Spend (Higher) /Lower than Prior Plan N 15/02/2012 1:41 PM a) O) 0 m .Q U as E as E E a) O a) CO a3 O c c C LL a) O) 0 m 0 a) N O Q O d N O c a) E Q O a) 0 a) 0 o m a) O c c C LL C O E E O U Attachment IV and Reserve Budget 2017 -2021 Total Change Ending Bal. c- CO N CO O 0n N- CO N- 0 M 0) N V N O 0n CO CO r 0) 0 M © N co V 0 N LC) CO V co N. OD LID N 00 N N N N CO O O LO N- O co co co O N CO O 00 CO V O N LO CO c- M LO N TF M O Y') CO N- 0 (9, co N- 0 CO CO CO 0 Tr CO N- 0 lfl O N O N V M O) f0 N- N " `-' O O O O O O O O O 0 O O ,—,— W 0 M 0A CO V N 0 N O co N CO N M Lf) M O M co T O N. CO N O N N O) 0 W 0 V O Tr O) co 0A CO LC) (N CO N N co O CO T O N. CO O M CO O f0 V O Tr CO c- N. LO N M Lf) CA co M N N CO N. M CO V N. M O 0 0 O O 0 N `-' r 0) CO CO r CO N O ' CO CA co M O 0 N u) N. N M N (0 V 0) r O) N N LO V 0 LID 0) V Li.) 0 M CA CO V N 0 N O co N 00 N M U O O N • R CO Cs C C W W 01 C- R L U O) co N CO © O LO N- co 0) © O N V co O N. N- CO N- N O L) N N M O O CA O) CO V O N M r N- O V Ti co N c- N O) 0 M N O) O CO CO Tr O 00 CO r O 00 O CO O N CO N- CO V N- N M O Y') CO N- © co CO r O CO CO LO O M N— O Lf) O N O N V CO O N- "" N N " `-' O O 0 0 O O O O 0 0 O O V V W N. 0 N- CO a- M CO co CO N CO N CO © f0 co M 0) O W CO M CO O CO N a- N O N O M © © O O) CA O N N CO CO O V TF M f- CO N O O N- N N O 0) 0 CC) CC) V O Tr V r ON. N. CO O M M CO N- N. N r N- N: W 0) CO CO r CO M N re: LC) CO CO LC) V ,r © ' f0 M N f■ N V CO a- Tr (9, CO CO N. N M O) CO CO V (N 0) N N N- 0) 0) V CO LLl N. O Tr N- CO e- M CO CO CO N CO N 2015 • R m Cs C C wc- W c R L U N- CO N V 0 N- CO r CO 0 0 Cr CO N V V C) CO LID CO N- LO O CO co N co CO O CO O co V co N. CO O) r CO r,- O N O) O O O O - 0 CO O CO CO CO 0 CO O O) O O CO 0A r M O W CO N- 0 M CO r O CO CO LO O V CO N- 0 CO O (N O N V M LO N ,— N O O O O O O O O O O O O CO W N N N CO V CO a- W co M M CA `-' V 0 Tr co O O O CO Cr O N LO 0 CO 0 CO 0 CO 0) CO Tr CO 0) r f0 M r c- 0A c- a- — O O O O CO O CO CO O CO O) O CA N r N- N Cr CO Lf) LLl CO CA O CO co CA N N- V N OD 0) CO O O 0 O O V 0 ' O V N. M CA O CO a- O CO CO CA a- CO V r LO M O) 0) O) V N N N CO V CO a- W CO M M CA �. 2014 • R CO CS C C w W 01 C- R 1: U CO CO N CO 0 CO r r co O O M CO N V CO O N N- CO N- CO O O N N CO CO 0 CO V co V O 00 r N- 0) 0 CO r- ,— 0A c- a- N Ln O 00 0) LO 0 M 0 N- O CC V O O co CO LO O a- r O •-- CO M O lfl CO N- O M CO r O CO CO LO O V CO N- 0 CO O (N O N V co N- V " " `_' O O 0 0 O O O O O 0 O O V V O CO lfl 0 CO Ti co N CO 0 f0 CO V M O M CO O O O CO CO O CO N CO O C0 O CO 0 CO 0) N- O CO O) O W co N- CO LO O Lfl LO 0 Cr - O CO O O CA LO O V r O N OD COO Cr O N: LLl Lf) N CA CO V CO CA V N O V N CO CO Cr co N- 0) CO V CO O CO V V V CO CO O O CO CO M N. O CO e co co CO V N O CO CO CO CO CO W N- CO `� 0 CO Cll 0 CO V CO N CO O CO CO V 2013 • R CO CS C C wa- W 0 C6 L U CO CO N M O co CO r CO LO 0 0) LC) N V (3) O N co co N- CO O CO CO N CO O Tr N CO V (3) O cf. r- 0 N N CO CC) 63 N r N- O CO LC) ' (9, O CO N : V N N V co C' M W CO N- M CO r ' CO CO LC) CO c- Lf) O N N V co N- ' Tr CO CO CA Lll 00 a- O M N co co 0 co co LO 0 LLl CO (3) O W N CO O CO 0 O 0) O) O CA CO O N N CO CO CO a- N N N- N. LC) ' LL) CO M V Tr Lf) CA N: O M CO CO a- N N. Lf) M Tr I� LC) V co V CO LID `� O 0 O O LO V CO V V co V — V M CO N CO M CO a- O W 0 N O O CO O M r... O) N- V CO CO CO CO Eic N- CO O 0) V CO CO CA Lf) CO a- 1:: 0 M r . : N co 2012 R m CS C C wa- W 0 C R U LO co N CO 0 Lf) CO N- CO CO 0 0 V N V co O CO V co N- co O co O N co O 0 N. LO CO V LOO N CO O N M co CC) I- O) O CO LC) N- LO N CO 0 (N a- O N V f- r CO Tr (N " co CO M lfl CO N- M CO r' CO co LC) V CO N- CO O N N V M f- ' N. O co O CO 00 a- CO N Tr CO CO O CO CO CO 0 CO CO M O M N co 0 M O O O O 0) LO O lfl CO O N N M CO CO a- O) O W LO CO 0 (N N N V CO CO N. " CO M M N CO M CA CO W CO a- W CO N CO N. M re: LO V CO 0) LO V `� CO V V V CO r CO r CO (N N CO CA U O N CO a- U V V V 0 Y') CO LO CO O) LO 0) M CO CO N V N. CC) CO O CO CO a- CO N Tr CO Balance Sheet Total Assets Total Liabilities Explanation of Municipal Position Reserve for Completion of WIP Anticipated Tangible Capital Assets TOTAL CAPITAL FUNDS TOTAL CAPITAL RESERVES Net Capital Portion TOTAL OPERATING RESERVES Q Q Q Q Q Q 01 01 01 m U O O 0 W u. 2 _ -1 Y J Attachment IV 2017 -2021 Total Change Ending Bal. O O O O O O ' 0 0 0 O O O O O O CO LC) N co CO N V a L. N N 0) LO 0 W ' co ' co LO O co N N LC) O O L) LC) ,r V co M 0 L. CO CO N I— O M N N N O 0 ' I— CO 0) M CO r CO , CO V O) co O) N- co O ' COO r O CO M O Ln CO CO CO N CO CO CO V O V ' IN— ,_ V 0 O V CO 0) N I— O CO CO N CO 0) r N— CO LC) LC) (3) CO O CO N Ln N O 0) LO CO CO LC) ' a cr W N. W e- N ll� O O N • R CO O) C C W W 01 C co L U W M N V O CO N N 0) LO O W ' CO ' ,— CO LC) O CO N- N LO 0 (0 Lo V V CO © N. CO CO N I— ,— M ) N M — .)— N .... CO co N O O f- N N 0) O O al M ' co O O (D r N O O CO LO V V O O U) CO CO N 0 N- �- Tr O O O ' I— CO O) M co I— CO — CO V a) co a) N- co 0 ' COO r O CO CO O LC) CO CO ,— ,— CO N CO CO CO CO CO CO CO O) V V ' N 0) CO N_ N I� 0) M CO M O) N N- O CO CO N M O) N- CO LC) LO 0) ,— ,— M O CO N LC) O O LC) CO CO LC) a O O `� ' a W M CO 4 fV W N (0 2015 • R CO is C C W a) CO c Ca L U CO CO co- V O LC) V co LO O V ' CO ' N r LC) O N V N 0 0 0 OO co co co © CO N V CO N 0 N CO CO O O O O O O ' 0 0 O O O O O O O O N— V V O O 0 ' N- CO 0) CO CO N- CO CO V O) co O) N- co O ' COO r O CO M O Ln O O O N CO CO CO CO CO CO CO N V ' M M N 0) 0) O V CO 0) N I- O) CO O N CO 0) r CO LC) n O CO O CO N LO O 0) LO n CO n O O O N ' O V CO 4 L. LP) M W W W N... 2014 • R CO O) C C W W 01 c L U CO CO co- V O Ln V CO LO O V ' CO ' N r 0 O N V N Ln LOO CO CO CO CO O CO _ N V CO — co (N CO V .... 0) V O V co co o © co N- ' O) ' LO O N CO LC) O W CO CO CO O O (D O CO V (0 CO 0 O V Tr. Tr O N- CO 0) CO CO N- CO ,— CO V 0) CO 0) N- CO O ' COO N- O CO CO O Ln CO CO CO N CO CO CO CO CO CO CO N V ' O CO N N N CO CO 0) N r O CO CO N CO 0) r CO Ln LO 0) ,— ,— CO O CO N Ln O (3) fl N- CO 0 N O O O ' a N O CO (0 (0 co M W N. O `-' 2013 • R CO a) C W W CO C R L U a30-0F co 0 CO V CO LP) r CO O N I - T r co V N LO co co co co co V M_VN V M N LP) O O O O O O 0 LO U) V N.. a CO © V V ' V CO co O O O O ' ' (0 V T r Tr O M O 0 0 V N- CO 0) CO CO N- CO CO V 0) CO 0) N- CO O ' COO r O CO CO O LC) CO CO CO N CO CO CO CO CO M CO N— O 0) O' O O CO N _ W 00 I� .� CO 0) N N- O CO CO N CO 0) N- CO LC) LO 0) ,— ,— CO O CO N Ln O 0) LC) 0) CO Ln CO O O N .� ' a W L. Tr CO O co M O .... 2012 • R CO CO C W W 01 c Ca U O) CO CO LO f� co 0 CO V CO LIl r CO O N I - T r CO V N LO CO M M CO M W CO V N N- LP) V ' a CO © " V V ' V CO I� r. r. 0) r. r. O O O I� © O O N V O O O M COO ' O O co V O co O co V CO .� LC) .� V .� ' ' r. © O O O (0 V T r Tr (0 N. .... O L. co N N- CO 0) CO CO N- CO ,— CO V 0) CO 0) N- CO O ' COO N- O CO CO O Ln CO CO CO N CO CO CO CO CO CO CO N— © r © © © © O O COO O O O O O COO ' ' LC) LC) LOO O CO N N O LO O CO V V .� .� 0) CO (3) ' CO N- (0 N r. CO LO N V .� CO 0) N N- O CO CO N CO 0) N- CO Ln LO 0) CO O CO N Ln O (3) LO CO Ln Ln r. © O O ' ' N .� ' r. r. � . © N © CO M O C N D V CO O LO CO O N LC) a co LP) M W 0 co M .-. CO C O N V ..., Balance Sheet E O W a) 4) W Q as E C o E C w .Q S C d O W W N W W N 0 07 C= -O W p C E W a) N W W U W i� W 0 ` C — L W C `p ,� N m-0 -0 ate) W W (_C6 aa)) O N E W).0 (.9W— a) (6 J a a5 >H Q > o W W HO]Q 9 th o L o J o a > O C (Q C N O E C C C C cC ( > n C 0 „0„.0„ m -0 ates m a ) a) E a N m a ao E � W m m m m ,, C CD W SnQHQ n N m Ca) 9 pL H C C C C w o C 7 aaaaaaa W 9 a a).- 5 E_ W 0 p) O O O O. O LL C C C C C C C � CN H J O] 1 Q > W - O W w w w Q mmmmmmm To W W W W W W LL to to to to to to to to _ ..Mm to to to to to to to to (in) To a a a a a a a W W W W W W aQ Q Q Q Q Q Q 'a 5-a)) a a a a a a a .Q a a a a a a a a a R a) a) a) a) a) a) a) R M W W W W W W W W co — W W W W W W W W W N co V LO CO N- S S S S S S S 2 N M V LO CO N- CO' E (n 0 a C U C C W W a) W E W 9 C O C a) W X C j W C,� �'i aaa O N C a) y U Q g (6 E a) E -o H o 2E C C W O a W � E W L 'J= O .0 W O (6 'Ot (a6 O Y VI to to to to to to to to to to to W W W W W W W W W W W W •- a a a a a a a a a a a Z 6 W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W Q O © N M CO - W O) O M N N N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 2012 Budget Grants COUNTY OF ELGIN GRANTS 2010 2011 1) Shedden Agricultural Society 4,500 4,500 2) Wallacetown Agricultural Society 4,500 4,500 3) Rodney - Aldborough Agricultural Society 4,500 4,500 4) Aylmer & East Elgin Agricultural Society 7,500 7,500 5) Elgin 4 -H Association 2,000 2,000 6) Tillsonburg & District Multi- Service Centre 4,500 4,022 7) Quad County Support Services 2,000 2,000 8) Seniors Picnic 2,500 2,500 9) Non - specific 5,000 5,000 10) Town Crier 2,000 2,000 11) Second Stage Housing 5,000 5,400 12) Elgin Community Nutrition Partnership 5,000 5,000 13) Elgin County Plowmen's Association 200 200 14) Med Quest Pilot Project 3,500 3,500 15) Ontario 911 Advisory Board 100 100 16) Tourism Signage Grants 2,654 17) IPM Legacy Scholarship 18) City Charity Hockey Game 19) Dutton Medical Centre 10,000 20) Total Regular Grants 21) St. Thomas Elgin General Hospital 22) Total Grants 62,800 55,376 2012 4,500 4,500 4,500 7,500 2,000 4,786 2,000 2,500 5,000 2,000 6,462 5,000 200 3,500 100 5,700 5,000 1,000 66,248 66,248 Attachment V 2012 (H) /L 2011 (764) (1,062) (3,047) (5,000) (1,000) - 10,873 J: \Common \Finance \Budget Development \2012 Proposed Budget \Corporate \Corporate Activities \Corporate Activities Grants 02/04/2012 11:28 AM 49 CORRESPONDENCE A ril 10 2012 Itentis for Carisicieratiori (Attached) 1. John Yakabtiski MPPI Renfrew-Nipissittig-Pembroke seeking support of his Private Member's Bill titled "Gasoline Tax Fairness for AI i Act, 2011", 2. Bill Tucker Director of Education providing corttact information if the need arises for a meeting with himself or the Capital Planning Cr:i-ordinating Cortimittee to discuss any issues or concerns., 50 From: Yakabuski, John Sent: VVednesday, March 28, 2012 6:22:52 PM To: County Warden Subject: Seeking Support for "Gasoline Tax Fairness for All Act" Dear Warden Walters, I am writing to ask for your support of my Private Member's Bill, Gasoline Tax Fairness for All Act, 2011, which will be called for Second Reading on Thursday, April 5. As I'm sure you're aware, this is not my first attempt at having this bill passed. I see this as an issue of fundamental fairness and will continue to attempt to rally support and push for change If passed, the bill would require the McGuinty government to amend the Public Transportation and Highway Improvement Act to allow municipalities without rapid transit or public transportation systems to apply for a rebate from the provincial gas tax for purposes related to public highways under their jurisdiction. The amount of the rebate that the municipality receives would be based an the number of inhabitants in the municipality and the total distance of public highways under the jurisdiction of the municipality, Over the years. I have heard repeatedly from municipal leaders all across the province who decry the unfairness of the current system - where only municipalities with public transportation systems can access rebates from the gas tax which is paid into by everyone. This imbalance was only exacerbated when the government recently announced that they would be increasing a number of fees for drivers licensing in Ontario. The cost of license plate renewals will rise 33% in the next three years. These inaes disproportionately affect rural Ontarians who need a vehicle to go about their daily lives because they don't have access to a public transportation system where they live. This at a time when average wages have stagnated. I am writing you today to that ask you lend your support for my bill by: • Providing quotations of support from yourself and/or your municipality; and • Contacting your local media to tell them that you support my bill. I look forward to your response and hope that you will support my motion, which will lua debated in the House on Thursday. April 5. Please contact my office at john.yakabuskiCftc.ola,orq or 416-325-2170 if you have any questions or concerns. As well, please find attached a copy of the bill Sincerely, John Yakabuski MPP Renfrew-Nipissing-Pembroke Chief Whip of the Official Opposition 51 27 ti Aa ighW r Ina ,L 1M ay tn'IP g lib(' tax tat ° k prOJ de 27 r (ices t X117 de Ia 'li esse a i f r1 t i t °t i rtl e 1" rig idhliv 1 am 1e PI 1ATOI w11 P ir4 twg w YIL C cr im 1i r9 Iii rn r; ra Cru Ysr p 1 wS P1 lr�, ar l 1111 i1L 11 Ir1E .'w SAY I 1SL l [0 nO lr �atll w° 1 91M1 IS I 1II lot Iauwr a Iri pt II hu : e xr 111 gran °i m&itlirut o tl 1m111a iltl�ii3Pu li5111,4 °. iFd sN`llw 1�u1 lla l.t 1111tc, irltIn 1tCy° ry a ° akt.. h Yn 11a tauatwia w° wr 'ilalrxthilut'il 1 gl 1 1 ram w+$ grlalli� I % . \° nawdre. 53 NC[11:1.r P CJC`' `liVIh! w i l du l , , "01 ■ larrtrarrr�� t� �a rr.I r i 1 r 1 C °rtwl�r 1 1,1 �l €allwr s, i i i c wwll 1 a1 tarm Pr err. I . rmw° Ilru a mar a lra 111mrr41 R li11 w °u;am of lr. r� lruaa t €orug d 1' I oalr do 1" ;xl lollww[ton ck roe u 1 r.� rl 1rarf1rHt g 1w lraa au, i� ",7w'4 14w�'m? awar 11 1 �9�^�..iltd aka ?CL 9wo t°. FtTti10 d'11IIPkt .kl'1ri Ca waa.0 ti .n 11 main e010. p lw x . r l uwut ml lal awlnls l wa iprw;6Vt , h r l0 ilti 1 i r Cr'ii. t1t L all uL" i Ir*wn l ir 1¢ r I 11 rtlw aft nlrar =,i ip l orr'wr °o In t I r i Lill t':1 silt a1 1 11 de it yawl Gill 27 2011 An At to amend the Public Transportation and Highway improvement Act with respect lo matching rebates of gasoline tax that the Minister provides to municipalities NQIc: Ibis ;pct ;upends the /'rrbJi,' `lire +t:s rot rcirir„1 and Highway lnrlu•,irCixcva Act. For the leeislaIi.,e history cif the Act, see the Table of Consolid recd Public Statutes Detailed Lc i4lativc history on ,aw =vv.e•1..avvs. oc ,..on.ca. Fier Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Legislative Assembly of the I'mvince of Onlai' i, enacts as follows: 1. Section 116 of the Public Transportation anti Highway Inrprrrre, rent Art is amended by ridding the following subsectionst M1lntrbint rehxlc (3) 11 the Minister, under elause (1) (b), enters into an ugrccmcrtt with n municipality 10 provide a rebate of' tax under the (nmo ?inc Tay.•fe./ to the municipality for o pur- pose described hi that c ?attsc, the Minister shall not refuse to enter into an agreement tilde:. clause (1) lo) to provide a rebate of tax under that :act to any other municipality for the purpose o' planning, designing_, constructing, maintaining, managing Of operating highways under the jurisdiction of the latter municipality if the Legislature by appropriation authorizes payment of the latter rebate• nt iiuiriuns (4) hr subsection (5), "first municipality" means the lnuni;:ipality that receives a rebate of lax under the (Rirsoliire ICU .vet t r d purpose described in rlausL (1)(h); ("hrorniere InunieipaIiit' "second municipality'. means th.e tnuniciptdity that re- ceives a rebate of tax under the (foists /lne Tax -1tt under subsection (3). ('•deuxieine municipality') Amuunl irrreimr (5) The amount of the rebate provided to the second potpie ipality shall be colctrl:r ed as f)�Ilcrvds: Ay(13 C) (D E) 54 Projet de Ioi 27 otliliartt la sur I'arnena gentent tics voles pul)liqucs et des transports en eomrnun is Pegard des rentboursentents de In taxe sur l'csscnce sirnilait'es consentis aux nttulicipatlites par k ntinistre 2(111 ftemarque ; 1.a presente Ioi i oditic la Lai seer' 1'nrrerta- CleFerrr SVs Vi.)/CS lurl?lklrres r1 rk.r tru+tsf.'n+'t.S' r'rr corrrtrnirr, dont I'historique Icgislatil' figure a la page pet-lincnte de I'flistorique Iegislatif detnill(3! des Iris J'int r i pr bli> coditices sur lc site www,lois- en- Iigne.gouw.an.ea. Ste \4aiestc. sur 1'avia et aaec le consentement de 1'Assentblec l:gislativc de Ia province de ('Ontario, edieir : 1. Val-tide 114 de to Loi s►rr !'trmenagentrttt relies prrhlignes• et des tr•anesprnts rte r nnuuun est nu)clili>t par adjonctinn Iles paragraphes suivants : Itcmhuursemrut slnrllaire (3) Si le ministre, en vertu de f'alinea { Il b), conclut avcc one nruniciprtlile urr accord prevnynni de lui c:unsen- tir tin rernbaursentcn de la :axe pitivile par la lot 40 ha ra1'c sot' l'ess'ercer is tine tin vise it cot ztlinCo, it ne doit pas iefuser de concture 1111 lel accord en vertu dc 1'alinr�r r.1) a) av:ec unc auu•c niunicipalitc en vile do la pltmitica• Lion, de la conception. de In construction, de I'eniretien, de Ia gcstion e i dc 1'exploitation de voles publicees rule- yard de la cornpctre:ice de cote mare manic :ipalitr? si la Leeisiature autarisc cc dcrnicr remh ►rrr'cemcni par affec- tation budectttire. I)fllnilion% (4) Les definitions qui suivcnr s'apl)tiquern au p1araRra- phe(5). udt tixi ne ntur;icipalite)r Aiunicipalite qui recoit un rcm- bourserncrtt dc Ia taxe prevuti par Ia l.oi de la tcrxe sat l'es.e• i (' ere application du Kara, rapl:e (3j. (<asecond municipality) rq)rcmUre municipality!, fvlurnicipalitc qui res;oit tin rcia- boursentcnt de In taxe prfvtle par Ia !.oi c4 la kw sat l essenr.c ;1 one tin vice a I'rrtinea (I) b). iora'st muni- c parlityi) Toil iii( du rerrtbaursement {) Le rontanl du rembaursement comsenti A la deaxi ern Inhi, eipalitir est eaten le cinnmesuit : A;�(13: C) (1) 1.1 dtA INI...w. a F tttwv o t i dig i rlrx « 1' hl r•c Wi i lri epar iIlt 6¢I ucii i S'IY I'4 IYP Cbl] I1.CJ irsl trr�alaiulit, cpr rti r rt�hr d chit n: d e s tt i t r2wiit i t s�rtllr 1 °lrl�b r s de �r7lrrrr rp i1e, l r° t i dl tine r 1e ti t s c uvre �thhge it i ° rtl 1e 1r e rtrtpd t r7 .1errxi i anu 1i a1i1 .; epr w 1 itr t1 1 rn t rtz 1l citr alr r�gri i rrhii L ct v rrt de i ,nrp t�rr aee deg Ia rrll i i iaJ I .; 55 le 201 / W (se., From: Theresa Levschuk [t.levschuk @t''& I ;b.on.ca] Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2012 3:28 PM To: Mark McDonald Sul p 'ct: Agreement with Thames Valley District School Board Dear a it On behalf of the Thames Valley District School Board, I would like to once again thank you for working so closely with us on the Letter of Agreement. As a follow -up to our Letter of Agreement, I want to let you know that at any time you are welcome to contact me if you believe a meeting is necessary to discuss issues concerning your municipality and the TVDSB. Our Agreement provides for an Annual Meeting to review any emerging issues and we would be pleased to schedule this. The members of our Capital Planning Co- ordinating Committee are always willing to openly discuss any opportunities and concerns that you may have. Please feel free to contact my assistant, Theresa, at 519 -452 -2000 ext. 20222 if required. Once again, thank you for working with us to provide the best possible opportunities for our : udents. BILL TUCKER Director of Education Theresa Levschuk Executive Assistant to the Director Thames Valley District School Board 1250 Dundas Street London, Ontario N6A 5L1 Ph: 519- 452 -2000 ext. 20222 Fax: 519- 452 -2396 email: t.levschuk(c�tvdsb.on.ca 56 CC — April 10, 2012 't-ms for Inforr1)n (Consent Agenda) - (Attached) 1. Hazel McCallion, Mayor, City of Mississauga requesting AMO officials meet with City nf Mississauga staff to discuss the need to have Hydro One reconsider its moratorium or the location of telecommunication antennas on existing hydro infrastructures, 2. Deb Matthews, Minister of Health and Long-Term Care confirming their support of the implementation of the Nursing Graduate Guarantee (NGG) initiative. 3. Dan Cowin, Executive Director, Municipal Finance Officers Association of Ontario (MFOA) providing a 2012 Provincial Budget Update dated March 27, 2012. 4. Lloyd Perrin, Director, Physical Services, Municipality of Central Elgin, with notice of East Side Development Area — Sanitary Servicing Class Environmental Assessment Project Completion review. 5. Jeff Yurek, MPP, Elgin-Middlesex-London requesting a stakeholders meeting to discuss the current budget's mandate to hrescope" the St, Thomas Elgin General Hospital Redevelopment project. 6. Bob Hammersley, President & CEO, St. Thomas & District Chamber of Commerce with Media Release requesting Ontario Government to reconsider delaying or reducing plans for the redevelopment of the St. Thomas Elgin General Hospital, 7. Tim Beckett, OAFC President, Ontario Association of Fire Chiefs announcing OAFC Municipal Politicians Seminar, The Essentials of Firefighting and Firefighting 101 to be held on May 6 th & 7th, 2012. 8. Greg Henderson, Water Compliance Coordinator, Elgin Area Water Supply System, with copy of : 1) Elgin Area Primary Water Supply System 2011 Compliance Report 2) Elgin-Middlesex Pumping Station 2011 Compliance Report (Reports are available upon request in Administrative Services) 9. Allison Stuart, Assistant Deputy Minister and Chief, Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services congratulating County for completing the mandatory emergency management program elements. 10. Jim Price, Executive Director, Association of Municipal Emergency Medical Services of Ontario with News Release announcing Emergency Medical Services Week 2012. 11, Aileen Murray, Manager of Economic Development, County of Middlesex inviting municipal councils and staff to a workshop hosted by Middlesex County on Resident Attraction and Retention to be held May 20th, 2012. 12. Grace McGartland, Chair, The Arts & Cookery Bank thanking Council for the honour of being named the Elgin County's 2011 Ambassador. 57 OFFICE OF THE MAYOR March 12, 2012 Ms. Pat Vanini Executive Director Association of Municipalities of Ontario 200 University Avenue Suite 801 Toronto„ Ontario M5H 3C6 Dear Ms. Vanini: iST Re: City of Mississan Te/ecommuni cation Tower/Antenna FaciIitis Interim Protocol The Council of the Corporation of the City of Mississauga at its meeting on March 7, 2012, adopted the enclosed Resolution 00046-2012 with respect to the City of Mississauga's interim telecommunication tower/antenna facilities protocol. I urge the Association of Municipalities of Ontario (AMO) to work with the municipalities across the Province of Ontario and wireless service providers to request that Hydro On reconsider its moratorium on the location of telecommunication antennas an existing hydro infrastructures. In the interim I would ask that AMO officials meet with City of Mississauga staff to discuss the growing need to have Hydro One change its practice. To facilitate this meeting contact Timothy Lee, Planner, Planning and Building, (905) 615-3200, ext. 3205 or by email at timothy,Icenississauga.ca, On behalf of the members of Council, I ask that serious consideration he given to the requests outlined in the enclosed Resolution. I look forward to your favourable reply. McCALLION, C.M., LL.D. MAYOR Leading today for tomorrow THE CCFORATICN OF HE CITY OF MISSISSAUGA 7300 n:TV CENTRE DRIVE, MISSISSAUGA, 07,1 L59 3E1 TEL: 05-B96-555E: FAX: 905-89G-5879 rr2vordrr.ssittega.ca CC: Enc The Honourable Cinistiart Paradis. Nlinister of Industry and Minister of State (Agriculture) Nlississauga Mississauga MP s Members of Council All Municipalities across the Province of Ontario l'ederation of Canadian Manielpalities Nlatthew Milil n, Real Estate anti NIturicipal Relations Advisor, Bell !viol:alit), Inc. Tatyana Moro, Municipal Relations Specialist, Network Iniplealeritatinn, Rogers Wireless Karim Balbaa, Manager, Real Estate, Public Mobile Joseph Boutros, Network DePloYmera Projects & cost Control Manager, N't Ind Mobile 13111 Reach., l)irectior, Real Estate, IVIcibilicity Joey Sayantliarajaft, Manager, Tecluto logy Strategy Property Management, Tutus Ed Sal ecki, Commissioner, Planning and Building 59 RESOLUTION 0046 -2012 adopted by the Council of The Corporation of the City of Mississauga at its meeting on March 7, 2012 0046 -2012 Moved by. Pat Saito Seconded by: Katie Mahoney 1. That the Report dated March 5, 2012 from the Commissioner of Planning and Building entitled "City of Mississauga Telecommunication Tower /Antenna Facilities Protocol ", be received for information. 2. That the revised "City of Mississauga Telecommunication Tower /Antenna Facilities Protocol" attached as Appendix 2 in the Report dated March 5, 2012, from the Commissioner of Planning and Building entitled "City of Mississauga Telecommunication Tower /Antenna Facilities Protocol ", be adopted as an interim protocol. 3. That the Report dated March 5, 2012, from the Commissioner of Planning and Building entitled "City of Mississauga Telecommunication Tower /Antenna Facilities Protocol" and resolution of Council be circulated to all Mississauga wireless service providers, local Members of Parliament and Ratepayer Assct:i,- .itions in Mi f;sauga. 4. That a fee of $2,500.00 be approved for the processing and consultation required far Telecommunications Tower /Antenna Facilities Request Forms and that the necessary amendment to the City's Fees and Charges By -law be brought forward to Council for consideration. That a fee of up to $4,000.00 plus 15% administration fee be approved for the purposes of retaining a consultant, when and if required, to assist with the review and consultation required for Telecommunication Tower /Antenna Facilities requests and that the necessary amendment to the City's fees and Charges By- law be brought forward to Council for consideration. That the Commissioner of Planning and Building report back on the effectiveness of the new process by December 31, 2012. t'age1of2 60 That the City f Iii request fiat the Association of Iuniipiitl f° and nt ri work with � r l i a liti r their in nt ri wireless �rl providers t request that ro Ode reconsider its rrrrtrirr "'aril the i ti n oft l mmun ti antennas n is�thi hydro inf strr tar Th t the It l i is rr s ro t it t foils pns l in view 01 1issis �u � and other 'munl ip liti ' growing n d have Hydro r change its practice,, and that the local Members f Parliament nd l n i Members f F r rirn l i M rU m nt are : d t support this r t u ritlr� to ,the Province of Ontario rd Ir n. It t It lisis request that !flutist.' r rnsldr the e i si rit i st li h d In their document - ti n 6, t r lr r _ants to acre it with the fan less t rid the p Ni r� tlmrranitin tr it hlt less than ft. above rd l Page of 61 Ministry ot Health and Long-Term Care Office of 1I Kiiister 101 Roar, Hepburn Blo ck BO Grosvenor Street Toronto ON M7A 204 Tel 418-327 4300 Fax 416-326-1571 vvw.v.heath.gov.on.ca March 13, 2012 Minister° de la Sante et des Solns de longue duree BureaL th rninisre elage, tLJifie Hepburn 60, rue G='05V4310r Tororto ON M7A 204 Tel 416-327-431M Tc 416-:326-1571 VAwifeallh.gov,on.ca Mr. Dave Mennill Warden County of Elgin (Elgin Manor) 450 Sunset Drive St. Thomas ON N5R 5V1 Dear Mr. Mennill: HLTC2968FL-2011,515. IFIS#: NS505 I am pleased to confirm our ministry's commitment to support the implementation of the Nursing Graduate Guarantee (NGG) initiative within your organization. The NGG stabilizes the nursing profession by providing Ontario's newly graduated nurses with the opportunity to gain full-time employment through a comprehensive orientation program. Please refer to the funding agreement and Schedule B, accessible through the Nursing Graduate Guarantee Management Module (NGGMM), at htto://www.healthtorceontaric cathfoiobs, to access the terms and conditions governing the ministry's funding and various accountability and administrative details. I would like to take this opportunity to thank you for your continued commitment and dedication to create a healthier system through the efficient integration of Ontario's newly graduated nurses. Sincerely, Deb Matthews Minister c: Mark McDonald, Chief Administrative Officer, County of Elgin (Elgin Manor) Rhonda Roberts, Director of Senior Services, County of Elgin (Elgin Manor) Jeff Yurek, MPP, Elgin-Middlesex-London Mil .01 (11.14) 7530.46EZ 62 FO MUNICIPAL FINANCE OFFICERS' ASSOCIATION OF ONTARIO 2012 Provincial Budget Update March 27, 2012 T O OUR P I tc RS On Tuesday, March 27 the Honourable Dwight Duncan presented the first budget of the Liberal government since the clectior. of October 2011. This budget comes close on the heels of the Drummond Report, which made a number of significant recommendations with regard to cost reductions for the Province. In addition, this represents the 'irst budget of the minority Govcrnn,:ent_ 1. Municipal Highlights The budget does not contain a great deal that is specific to municipalities. A chapter on the municipal sector is largely a summary of past Support to the sector for infrastructure, social service uploads and OMPF. However, there are a number of initiatives that will have impacts on the sector. o. Pensions (pp 269 -27 0) OMERS is a jointly sponsored pension plan (JSPP). The budget contains important proposals for such plans that have funding deficits. Traditionally, such deficits are addressed through increased contribution rates or reduced benefits. In recent years, increased contribution rates_ have been the primary method for addressing shortfalls. Currently, contribution rates are in the range of 11% to 13% forJSPPs and, in some cases, additional increases are already planned for future years. The governrnent proposes to initiate consultations to make these plans sustainable and affordable such that they do riot add to employer and taxpayer expense, The government vdill consult with stakeholders before introducing legislation that will incorporate the following framework. • In case of a deficit, plans would be required to reduce future benefits or ancillary benefits before further Increasing contributions; c.. In exceptional circumstances, a limit would be set on the amount of value of benefit reductions before additional contribution increases could be considered o Any benefit reductions would involve future benefits only, not those that have already accrued. Current retirees would not he affected; o Where employee contributions are currently less than employer contributions, increased employee contributions would also be available as a toll to reduce pension benefits; Where plan sponsors cannot agree on benefit reductions through negotiation, a new third party dispute resolution process would be invoked; and IMFDA Provincial Budget Update, March 27, 2012 63 P1 0 The framework would be reviewed after the provincial budget is balanced. • It may be several years before this affects ©MERS since these provisions will take effect at the next actuarial filing, which is several years off. • None of these proposals will affect contribution rates for municipal employers in the immediate term. Announced contribution rate increases are expected to come into effect b. DARPF (p. 51) The budget repeats the Premier's announcement at the end of February at the ROMA /OGRA conference that there will be a review of the OMPF, OMPF will be phased down to 5500 million by 2016. There is a commitment to consult with the municipal sector on how to reform this program at the $500 million level. c. Provincial Social Service Upload (p. 51) The budget repeats a commitment, made on several occasions already, to keep to the schedule of social service uploads coming out of the Provincial - Municipal Fiscal Service Delivery Review. d. Provincial Offences Act (p. 52) • The Province is committed to improving the recovery of unpaid POA fines and supporting municipalities in this regard by granting improved collection methods. • The Province is proposing a mechanism whereby the issuance or renewal of a vehicle license plate would be refused for unpaid fines related to the vehicle. In addition, the Province is proposing a mechanism whereby unpaid POA fines would be offset against tax refunds issue by the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA). • The government will consult with municipalities and stakeholders, including the CRA, on these initiatives. e. Business Education Tax (BET) Reductions (p. 103) • Since 2007, high BET rates have been reduced by the Province, Under the original BET reduction plan, reductions were to continue to 2014. The province will be freezing further reductions beginning in 2013. The government will resume the BET reductions when the province returns to a balanced budget position in 2 017 -1.8. f. Regional Fund • The following funds will be maintained: o The proposed Southwestern Ontario Development Fund o The Eastern Ontario Development Fund (EODF); and o The programs administered by the Northern Ontario Heritage Fund Corporation (NOHFC). MFC)A Provincial Budget Update, March 27, 201 64 P2 2. PronciaI Financial Position Th Provirwe still plans to Eialance the budget in 2D17-18. Th balanced budge reflects very significant program expenditure retraInt until 201748. The government will hold spending |n program expenses to 0.9% that is consiste.nt with the Drummond Report recommendations. The budget ppears to accept the nElIysis in the Drurnrnond Report tIt the provincial deficit will be $30.2 billion in 2017-18 if no corrective Artions on spending andlor revenues are taken. ° A variety of meastires are proposed iri the hudget to achieve balance inJO17'18. Savings are planned through removing overlap and duplication, more efficient and effective delivery models and focusirlg on core business. See Apper,dix A for more details. m Expense measures iriclude: o [xpense management measures o Compensation restraint o Cost avoidance w On the revenue side, the budget envisions: o A/ree/e on the corporate incon`e tax rate at o o A foeprecf business education tax reductions o Increases for a number of fees tu move tm full cost recovery o Optimizing LCBC potential revenue enhancements Table 2.24:Ontario's Recovery PIan ($ billions) (b. 84) Budget ExLendeoOudook Interim Plan Medium Term 11'12 12'13 13-14 14-15 15'16 16'17 17-18 Revenue 109.3 112.2 116.1 12I/0 126.2 131.2 135.9 Expense Programs 114.5 115.8 117.0 117.9 118.5 118.7 118.9 |nt�ncst�nD�bt 10.1 10.6 112 12.3 I4.l 15.1 15.4 Total Expense 124.6 126.4 128.2 130.3 132.6 133.8 134.4 Reserve 2.0 12 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 Surplus/Deficit (15.3) (15.2) (13.3) (10.7) (7.8) (4.2) 3. Economic Outlook Table Z.8(b. l22) has u number *f key economic indicators projected to 2015. The projections are froni the Ministry of Finance. HOA Provincial Budget Update:, rch 27, 2 1? 65 mem P3 Table 2.5: Ontario onomic Outlook (%) 2009 2010 201I 2012 3013 2014 2015 Real GDP Growth (3.2) 3.0 1.8 1.7 2.2 2.4 2.5 Nominal GDP Growth (0.9) 5.3 4.2 3.4 4.1 4.2 4-3 Employment Growth /2.5\ 1,7 1.8 0.9 1.3 1.5 1'6 a. Employment Since the recessiori Iaw in June 2009, &most 300000 net jc±s hav€ been credttd in 0ntrio wIJi most of these in industries paying above average wages. The unemployment rate has faller from a recession high of9.4%|n]mne 2009 to7.B%in February 2012. b. GDP Ontario real GDP has fully recovered from the recession of 2008 '2'2. Since 2003, real GDP has grown by 10.996. In 2011, consumers and business nvestnient contributed stroriIy to real GOPgnzvxth of 1.8%. Government was a net drag or GDP. Exports continued to Ia below pre-recession levels. Ontarios estimates of future real GDP are generally conservative relative to province sector forecasts (see Table 7.10 for private sector forecasts ofOntario real GDP). c. Interest Rates and Canadian Dollar Table 2.7: Outlook for External Factors I009 2010 20I1 2012 2013 2014 2015 Cnd. Dollar /centJ 87.6 97.1 101.1 98 101 1.82.5 102 3rmV.TBill Rate (%) 03 06 0.9 0L9 1.4 2.4 3.4 a. New Economic Reality The Drummond Report indicated that Ontario's economy has seen significant changes in recent years. The budget too talks about the "new economic reaIty' in Ontario. The budget identifies key economic challenges: Emerging markets that are capturing a share ofOntario's export markets. for example, Chinas share of the U.S. merthandise iricreased fi'om 8%to 18% from 2O80toZ012. During this time Ontario's share declined from 11% to 7%. � Higher oil prices. This is both a blessing and a curse. HiEh oil prices drive costs for businesses and manufacturers. On the other hand, Canada is an oil exporter. o HgIi Catiadiari dollar, which reduces the cornpetitiveness of our exports In the Joner-terrn, an aging popu3ation will result MPO.A Provincial Budget Update, March 27, 2012 66 P4 4. Other Initiatives a. Public Sector Comperation The balanced budget is predicated on restraining public-sector compensation for the full five year on the plan. Various steps included in this plan are: w two year wage freeze for education and school board with no incremental increases - details provided below; freeze IV1PP'n pay for another two yers, bringing the pay freeze for five years; • extending pay freezc for executives are Ontario's hospitals, colleges, universities, school boards and agencies for another two years; m total physician comp€nsation to remain at current Ievels in the next agreemriL with Ontario Medical Association; • Ontario Public Service Employee Union (OPSEU) and Association of Management Administrative and Professional Crown Employees of Ontario (AKqAPCEO) will be negotiated within the Budget's EscaI plan. The fiscal plan provides no funding for incremental compensation increases for new collective agreements. * Greater transparency anci acco.untability for arbitration \112 a more efficient process. This will include: written submissions by both parties, a written rational of the decision by the arbitrator and will include a dialogue with the employer related to the fiscal impact 0fthe seltiernent for tliose who have autornatk access to this process bout additional tools they may need to live within their fundig envelopes. • There are 4r000 coflective agreements in the Droadr public sector. To increase effectiveness, there isa move towards greater centralization o[bargaining over time. w reduction af Ontario Public Services by a further I,000 Full Time Equivalents (FTE's) while ensuring fronl-line services are not cornpromnised. Specifically related to education and school boards, the follovving parameters are outlined: ° a freeze om banked sick days with payout upon retirement; • introduction ofsick-leave plan with six full days per year auvnePted with 24 weeks at two-thirds; and * no rncreasing coriLributions to Ontario Teachers Pension PIan. ��FouPrcivincial Buhiget Bndute'Mxrcn2:/.2.UL1 67 P 5 5. Appendix A: Report *n Expense Management Measures a. Removing Overlap and Duplication • Ministry of Childre.n and Youth services - Youth Centers downsizing and closing 3 • Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation will be consolidating business support programs into one bbs and Prosperity Fund (p. 5' Repert or Expense Management Measures) • Merge Ministry of economic development and trade with Ministry of Research and Innovation — saving $12 million over three years (p. 5) » Ministry of Education • Amalgamation of neighbouring district boards —saving $27.2 million over 3 years (p.6) • MMAH rationalizing and consolidating functions, eliminating work in certain areas and discontinuing non-core functions saving $1l3 million over three years (9, 7) • 4 grants consolidated into one Cultural Strategic Investment Fund — Museum and Technology Fund, International Cultural Initiatives, Creative Communities Prosperity Fund and Cultural Strategic|ovestmertFuod —sawng 511 million over three years (p.7) • Entertainment and Creative Cluster Partnership Fund sunsetting one year early (p, 7) • Combine Electric Vehicle Incentive Program and Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure —saving $411 million over 3 years (p.8} b. More Efficient wid Effective Delivery Models • Community Start-up and Maintenance Benefit and Home Repairs Benefit vvill be removed from social assistance - housing supports delivered through Long Terrn Affordabie !Housing Strategy — contribute to lower 'welfare wall' - $16Z.5 million (p. 11) • Heath and non-•Iiealth related ciiscretioruary henetits capped at $lU per case — save $55.]million over 3 years (p.Il) continuing with closure of Toronto West Detention Centre —saving 523l.6 million over ]years (p. 12) w Reduce incentives in education funding formula that facilitate the continued operation of underutilized school sites — saving $lI6'3 million over 3ysars(p.I4) w Cap on secondary credits will reduce the number of students who return for a fifth year of high schoo| — saving $35.9 million over l years (p.14) w Student transportation — impiementat ion of a competitive procurement process — saving $34.3 million over 3years (p. 15) • Drive Clean is becoming a Delegated Administrative Authority (DAN; will be fully funded by its own revenue — saving $I1miNon over three years (p,1S) • Moving towards full self-Insurance and elimination of General and Roads Liability Protection Program — saving $6.4 million over 3 years (p16) ° Otitaro Labou Relations Board moving to part tlnie rnembers — saving $0.6 million over 3 years (P. 17) • MPWAH ending its enforcement role forpropertynoahntenonc*standurdo — saving $D.1 million over 3 years (p, I7) • MNR will move away from detaUed review and approval oI site-specific actwities and dehiver services on larger geographic scales; stocked fishing and park-based recreational activities will be reduced —saving 553.6 milIon over 3 years (p. 18) .N1[nA Provincial Budget Update, March 27'20l2 68 ,feery��n�� P6 • MNR reorienting stewardship assistance away from direct staff support to incentives and grants focused on achieving government priorites and biodiversity conservation - sar:ing $11.6 million over 3 years (p, 19) • MNR - moving away from ongoing individual species related activities to a focus or ecosystems - saving $11.2 mil ion over 3 years (p. 19) • Tourism, Culture and Sport - focusing on online marketing (p. 20) • Ministry of Transportation reviewing©ritario's intercity bus regulatory regime to achieve greater efficiencies and other transit initiatives - saving $111,8 million over 3 years (p. 20) + Ministry of Transportation reducing support for road used safety efforts - saving $1.1 million over 3 years (p. 21) I\1inistry of Transportation pursuing alternative delivery methods - saving $2.1 minion over 3 years (p. 21) c. Focusing on Core Businesses + Finistry of Aboriginal Affairs - -New Relationship Fund and Partnership Fund reduced, reducing community capital grants; administrative efficiencies (p. 23) • Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs - capping Business Risk Management Programs - saving $39.7 million over 3 years (p. 24) • OMAFRA looking at transfer payment accountability ;p. 25) • Ministry of the Attorney General - alternative strategies for constructing courthouses, building shared spaces (p, 26) + Ministry of Children and Youth services- agency amalgamations., back- office consolidations, shared service delivery, new funding model, etc. - saving $48.4 million over 3 years (p. 2.7) • Staged increase to Ontario Child Benefit (p. 27) • Ministry of Citizenship and Immigration seeking efficiencies in language training services and newcomer settlement services • Ministry of Community Safety and Correction Services - reduce overtime costs in corrective services and OPP - saving $10.5 million over 3 years ip. 28) • Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation - capping funding under operating and capital components of the Ontario Research Fund; not extending Next Generation of Jobs Fund, scaling back transfers to Commercialization and Innovation Network Support (pp 29 -30; • Ministry of Education reduce or eliminate discretionary grants to school boards; reductions for funding special projects and to grants provided to third parties - saving $107 million over 3 years (p. 31); 2,5% reduction in the transfer payment to the Education Quality and Accountability Office; Program Enhancement Grant discontinued; reduce number of positions for curriculums and teaching specialists; reduce capital grants for schools by $75 million + Ministry of Energy - Ontario Clean Energy Benefit Cap of 3,000 kWh per month - capping benefit to largest users - saving $470 million over 3 years (pp 33 -34) • f41inistrr of Environment - trying to reduce costs of Selected Household Hazardous Waste Initiative - $8.7 million • Ministry of Environment - No funding under Water Opportunities and Water Conservation Act because no regulations in place (p. 34) • Ministry of Finance - Upload of PMFSIDR; phase down of °MPF to $500 million by 2D16 - combined savings of $160 million over .3 years (p. 35) • Servir e©ntario shifting to Tess expensive online services -- (p. 35) VOA I'rovi Budget Update, March 27, 2012 69 areminsiminna P7 • Ministry of Health an longterm care - High Income seniors will pay a new income tested deductible, increase gradually with income beginning August 2 014; 5% of seniors Ontario Drug Benefit recipients will be paying more - swing $3D million over 3 years (p. 37) • Cancellation of tour previously announced major hospital projects and re- scoping of two others (p. 39); longer term planning shifting delivery of services to community setting; agencies receiving funding will have to reduce administrative costs (p. 40); reducing per- resident funding to medical schools and funding for indirect teaching costs reduced • MMAH - Discontinuing Dr. Albert Rose Bursary for postsecondary students living in social housing • saving $3.5 million over 3 years (p. 42) • MMAH - scheduled reductions in Canada - Ontario Social Housing Agreement reflect the decrease in provincial expense as a result of decreases in projected federal funding - saving million over 3 years (p. 42) • MNR reducing capital funding for Ontario Parks, prioritizing rehabilitation and repairs to the Ontario Parks system (p. 43) • Ministry of Northern Development ancl h1ines - parts of the Ontario Northland Transportation Commission will be divested and ari alternative business model will be developed for key transportation services in northern Ontario - no longer subsidizing ONTC- saving $265.9 million over 3 years (pp 43 -14) • Investing in northern highways rehabilitation will he reduced by $208 million over the next 6 years (p. 44) • Tourism, Culture and sport - reducing attraction agency operating grants (p. 45) • Convention Development Fund is sunsetting one year early (p. 46) • Flatline Renewal Funding for Tourism Agencies - investments in renewal will be reduced by $21 million over the next six years (p. 46) • Ministry of Col eges, Trairing and Universities - discontinuing some bursaries and scholarships, phased elimination of the Small Northern and Rural Grant for some colleges (p. 47) • Elimination of subsidies for non -PhD International students provided to institutions to pay for municipal taxation in lieu of property taxes (p. 48) • Reduce unallocated postsecondary capacity funding $164 million over the next six years (p. 48) • Ministry of Transportation - bringing Provincial Highways Management In house - was previously contracted out - too expensive as offered by private sector (p. 49) • Delaying previously approved highway expansion and high- occupancy vehicle lane projects will save $229 million over six years - $14.2 million ever 3 years (p. 49) • Investments in highway rehabilitation and in Go Transit wiU be reduced by $1.4 billion over the piext 6 years, $15.6 million over 3 years (p. 50) IvIF()A Prnvincal Budget Update, March 27, 2 012 70 P8 For r r inforr iu Covvin live Direct rra, OA 4163629O1 x 223 d ..n@rm o n.c n c mu 17 Ha Policy Adv A 416-362,900, r sfoa onv a 7, 71 MAP, 2 J 2112 COUt.;'i 7 , is E L East Side Development Area -- Sanitary Servicing Class Enwironm tA}dgssess Notice of Project Completion The City of St. Thomas and the Municipality of Central Elgin jointly initiated the East Side Development Area (ESDA) Senticing Master Plan and Muricipal Class Environmental Assessment (EA) in 1999. This study recommended sanitary servicing for the ESDA be implemented in two phases. including the construction of three sanitary pump stations (PS) and associated 1ureernainitrunk severs, to convey sanitary flow from the ESDA to the St. Thomas sanitary collection system. The current v.ork undertaken by AECOM Canada Ltd., confirms the locations for the three pump slatiuns (Talbot Line Airport PS, Elm Street PS) and associated forcemainttrunk sewer alignments for Prase 1, as well as provides preliminary project costing and servicing details. The preferred locations for the pump stations and forcemainitrunk sewer alignments are illustrates on the attached figure, Due lo current septic system failures the Municipality of Central Elgin is recommending construction of the Talbot Line Pump Station and associated sanitary sewers bo initiated In 2012. This work will be completed in four stages (Al, A2, B, and CJ as illustrated on the attached Figure. Construction and associated servicing of the remaining two puma stations will he undertaken in the future as - equired by residential and industrial development. By this notice, the draft Screening Report will be placed on public record an April 2, 2012 for thirty (30) calern . days to be reviewed by members of the public andfor any other interested party at the following locations: Municipality of Central Elgin 450 Sunset Drive, St. Thomas City of St. Thomas City Hall 545 Talbot Street, St. Thomas City of St. Thomas Public Library 3 Curtis Street. St. i homes The Municipal Class EA process entitles members of the public, First Nations communities, interested groups and review agencies who have significant concerns about the project which cannot be resolved, to request the Minister of the Environment to issue an order to comply with Part II of the EA Act. This is known as a 'Part II Order', bumping up Itre status of this project to a full Individual Environmental Assessment. The procedure for a Part II Orderrequest is as follows: First, the person with concerns directs there to the Municipality of Central Elgin and AECOM Canada Ltd., during the 30 calendar day rray.aw period for consideration and mitigation. Second, if the concerns cannot be resolved, the person may submit a Part II Order request to the Minister of the Environment at 135 St. Clair Avenue 'Nest, 129' Floor, Toronto ON, M4V 1 P5 by May 4, 2012 with a copy of the request being sent to the Municipality of Central Elgin and AECOM, Please contact the following team leaders if you have any questions or comments on the informaton provided in the draft Screening Report no later than May 4, 2012. Lloyd Perrin Director, Physical Services Municipality of Central Elgin Tony Fcdiw, P.Eng Project Manager AECOM Canada Ltd. 450 Sunset Drive 2511 York Street. Suite 410 St. Thomas, ON N5R5V1 London, ON N6A 6K2 Tel: (519) 331.4860 Fax: (519) 631 -403F, Email: Iperrinjcentralelgin.org Tel: (519) 063 -5808 Fax: (519) 673 -5975 Emaihantony ferfiw aecom.corn Subject to the comments received as a result of this notice and receipt of necessary approvals. implementation of the recommended works can proceed, This notice issued on March 24, 2 ©12 72 :i9GE4YARE LINE SJ L, IHtUG F/.'ARE AC! r 0 z fl Farcernaiii to Sinclair Are Senor From Talbot PS Sande. Area Airport PS Telbot Line PS 11 F saeemarl N'ollinytem Sewer from Airport PS SorviceArea i TA TL "NElvi;rr 'ELML .6ii'1 l.i fiC: 1' Forcomaln tr Ebro 5t Sewer from Errn Sr I. Ser dco Area ?roposed Purn,p Station Existing Sanitary Sewers Proposed Elm Line PS Forcerrraln (To Elm Sewer) Pro posec Airport PS Forcernain To Wellington Sower) Proposed Talbot PS Forcernain (To Sinclair Ave Sewer) Iirver'.Slrearn Railway Contours KCCAlCCCA Boundary 1,•Vaod Lots Lot lines �r:.uclon Service Areas Pump:' War Talbot Pump St ThornaslCentral Elgin Boundary The Municipality of Central Elgin & The City of St Thomas East Side Sanitary Servicing Master Plan rod -w* "Mr et 73 1 Elm St PS Service Area Airport PS Service Area == ration Service Area - Staging Talbot 5er vice Area Slav Al Talbot. Service Area Stage A2 Talbot Service Area Stage B Talbot Service Area Stage C Preferred Servicir Alternative & Servicing Staging Scala: 1 :2511OU PN pate: i7e� ember 2911 ratum NA1-J63 LIT'f 71 ?N Jeff Yurek, MPP Elgin- Midr1. Bx -Lond The Honourable Deb Ma (1110W ivliuislry of Health and Long (' ;wt' 10111 Floor, Hepburn Buck SO Grosvenor Street Toronto. Ontario rv`I7A ?C4 1)car 1`vlinistcr Matthews, 4uear.'s Park O Ice. .14.1 I.eqplativF. Eu.�illnn,,I 1 Por's •',1 r<. Tanya:), Oritarni rf7r,110 rut , 1 1 C ' ; , r;1x ;; +11i; :;:;:5-,591S9 E Rail le11 yurek' Cullstiluc;ric:y ]rfire. ;5(17a LA S1., Slllla' ; ?i�1'fat "SI'4` S1. Thomas,'lnlar:c1- N5F 1 E:: ICC 14i G:S1- Gt Toll F u r 1 sl • ;'r; :1[) r iktf In CI'; 1. O.a, 11 u.:' 1 'a �. •, Fun writing R. you on behalf of the concerned constttue.nts in my riding c•f Elgin - Middlesex- London. As you know. the current Iiuldgeet ITianclates i `rescoping' ()I the St. "Thomas- Elgin General Hospital Redevelopment project. While not a direct cut to the hospital project., the vagueness and uncertainty of the mandate has made all of us living in Agin County uneasy. think it is imperative that you sit down with the key stakeholders of the project as salon as possible. Certainly Paul Collins. Si. . Thomas Mayor Heather Jackson-Chapman, and Warden of Elgin County Bill Walters should be informed of the government's plan; irrlrl cdiatcly. The n1Lr11rCipalitics need to introduce their ov.n budgets and this project is a major component. I am inir:resleci in ensuring that communications between all those involved is clear so that appropriate plans can he made going forward. We in the St. 'fhctITas -Elgin zuea understand now vital this hospital is and as the, provincial representative, I lvan1. to make sure my constituents have SCAM chi ity ill this matter. I appreciate your attention and consideration and look Iorwarcl to working with you so that wc can provide the pcop:c of this area some answers. We want to nuke sure that the residents of this area have access to the hest health Car: abut hlal reactires us all Lo work together. 1 look forward to your response. Sine's r Jeff `1' kliyk. h11'I, E1 r(- Middlesex- London ('r'cl: Paul Collins, CEO and i'resiclent of S'TEGI-I; Health J,FC.kson ('hapm.all, I�lvoi of St. Thomas; Bill Walters. Warden or Elkin C'tlunty 74 I\i1a icl1 3(1 2 1'2 1 =i�r Ir11Irlcdiato iVIli[7IA t t::1 I:AsL II R [JOT liUi a .t liornIas and t._IgIn Courtly need tile, Government to enter plans al'JloL,Ii::ec: Ill Tuesday's budget :hat imply much- needt.td redevelopment of the 5t, I Ilonias Elg:n General Hospital tvgill oe or reduced, The St. Thomas & District Ciiarnbe- o° Commerce fully supports the avera.l positio- aid direction taken by the province the budget but is asking for complete reconsideration 01 `,Iin Ir1tnntinii to reduce lice investment in cur coI'11IrR I Ity by changing hospital plans rrrrnoonced prier to We Iasi e e::tioll_ Chamber r PI sidelit & CEO Bob Hammersley says he believes the province needs to dive (y..1- cuii'rnunity special eur1siderul'ur, saying "We urge the premier and the 'Amster of I-'leall:l to re :_;onsrder. The economy has hit area very hard with job losses and our work to "enev' ano rebuild will become Flock harder with any reductions at this lirne. We're asking the province to help, riot hurt u s as we work to renew our economic health.' The Chamber recognizes the St 'I homas Elgin Gene:nit Hospital as a key component in economic renewal. I-farnrn:- rsley explains Getting and keeping jobs here is based on lluch more that havirl9 businesses firrd the right people and a good site. C..alily-of -life s no.v ais essential ccrrporient that employers and investors reilul e as tney evaluate decisions to conic, leave or. grow_ The St Thomas tioSpi : :at is a high-value asset ti :•.'Ith an exceptional record of service and perforriance.' 7l renew anc expand emergency care. sii jicnl and rrenta1 health facilities in St. Thomas began in 1 995 and were the basis of a $100 million rebLlildirq p1::in confirmed last sunn rcr before the election. For n1 forriotian: c b) Na.r rrers!oy Presid ont 8, CEO bc :OssltI ie aide 'ainljer.e n.e.;r �1 ' t�31 I93i Extens :oil 524 it F• r .. `5 �° i i .,x: �., r �'7 iE �� #re.t�il1 It�l'77r'1'rs 1.I I .,, 6 #W Fi Chief! 2011 -2012 President CHIEF T. BECKETT 519 -741 -2926 Fax 51 - 741.2697 t_m hQnc�;�l F�.`kIIS?nPr,o 1st Vlce -F'r s Jent CHIEF K. FOSTER 705- 526 -1279 ert. 2234 Fax' 705-527-4543 2110 V::ce- Prestuen: DEPUTY CHIEF M. PEGG %5-874.2723 Fax 905. 874.272) 3rd Vice- Presider! CHEF T. BRYAN 705-205,13990 Fax 705 - 2956786 Treasurer DEPUTY CHIEF F. LAMIE 416 - 338•9 05 Fax 410 -33R -9060 Ppsl- Preb:dent CHIEF L. GRANT 305 -345 -7114 x4402 FPx 905 -33R -4403 DIRECTORS ASSISTANT CHIEF R. ARNEL 510 352 -840 1 ext. 3419 CHIEF W. BRINKMAN 607 -46' -6137 FAX' 607- 467 -2155 061••9526 0480 • DEPUTY CHIEF G. MILLS 13-590,2424 e I. 29431) FEU 613 - 590 -28E4 CHIEF 9. MIN 135- 333 -0772 I x 905333 - 9727 esedh,jrl ng;gn.c DEPUTY CHIEF N. MURPHY 313.548.4001 Eat 5202 Fax 613..384 -5233 CHIEF G. PIGEON 913.632 -1135 Fax 613. 632 -1700 2 cn Mayor and Members of Council: Experience what it feels like to fight a fire! Slip into bunker gear and 'feel the heat' at the............ OAFC Municipal Politicians , ar: The Essentials of Firefighting and Firefighting 101 Sunday, May 6th and Monday, May 7th, 2012 Now in its seventh year, the OAFC Politicians Seminar: The Essentials of Firefighting and Firefighting 101, offers municipal Councillors the opportunity to understand the challenges of the fire service and its importance to their communities. This two -day session will provide you with essential information about the fire service and ncludes an interactive experience that you will never forget! The seminar also includes a variety of presentations pertaining to fire service in your community and a variety of topics that your local Fire Chiefs are concerned with. Some of the exciting topics include: • Civil Liability: I Don't Wan: to See You in Court • A Personal Account of the 2011 Slave Lake Wildfire • Meaford Legal Case • Provincial Ministers Remarks • Fire Safety Hazards Involved in a Hoarding Situation On Sunday afternoon you will slip into bunker gear and experience firsthand the life cf a firefighter by participating i,n a live fire training session. This program has been specially tailored for politicians by the City of Toronto Fire Services, in partnership with the OAFC. Sunday evening you have the opportunity to attend the Annual OAFC Memorial Service where we will remember and memorialize the chief officers who have passed since our last conference. Following the service you are invited to join us at a wine & cheese reception. Monday afternoon you have the opportunity to visit the largest fire service Trade Show in Canada, where ycu will be able to see a wide variety of fire vehicles and equipment and talk directly to the supp'iers and manufacturers. Politicians who have previously attended this seminar have ro peatedly said that it was one of the best conferences and training sessions that they had ever attended! "Let me tell you, it was tough and de.rrrarrdirig work. 1 want to thank Chief Boyes, Chief Beckett. the Fire Chiefs Association and the training staff for that unforgettable experience". The Honourable Peter Fonseca, former Minister of tabour Full Seminar details are available online at www.oafcevents.com. Registration fee includes Monday breakfast, lunch on Sunday and Monday and the wine and cheese reception on Sunday. Registration is limited to 24 people. To register please complete the attached registration form and fax it to the OAFC office to 905- 426- 3032. If your Fire Chief is an OAFC member you will receive the special member registration rate. Yours truly, Tim Beckett OAFC President 1 TA Sunday, May 6th and Monday, May 7th , 2012 - DoubteTree Hotel, 655 Dixon Rd., Toronto, ON Experience what It feels like to fight a fire....... The Essentials of Firefighting and Firefighting 101, offers municipal Councillors the opportunity to understand the challenges of the fire service and its importance to their communities. This two -day session will provide you with essential information about the fire service and includes an interactive experience that you will never forget, The seminar portion will include a variety of present ii:iari.3 pertaining to the fire service in your community and a variety of topic that your local Fire Chiefs are concerned with. Rectietietion is limited to only 24 participants so book early to avoid disappointment. Some of the exciting topics include: Slave Lake Wildfire and Everything Since resented by Chief Jamie Coutts, Lesser S lave Regional Fire Services In May of 2011, Slave Lake, Alberta suffered a fire that .. _ it :.: l I including over 50 homes spread over 45 kilometers and forced in excess of 7,000 people to evacuate. The losses and subsequent rebuild cf this community is a tale for the ages and will address stories of fear, overwhelming odds, heroism, and the survival of the people and the place they call home Chef Coutls will share operaticrai details and the continuing stories as their community rebuilds from the ground up. Fire Safety Hazards Involved in a Hoarding Situation Presented by Trevor Bain, Acting Assistant Deputy Fire 1; %∎- 2.'shal, Office of the Fire t4;l u:shat The September 2010 high rise fire at 200 Wellesley St. in Toronto is known as the worst hoarding fire ever in Canada This has triggered numerous agencies such as public health, community housing and fire and police forces to get involved in hoarding task forces but the majority of the hoarding - prevention efforts have landed directly in the hands of many Ontario fire services. Civil Liability: I Don't Want to See rat h of 'i �" You In Court Presented by Gordon Graham, Graham Research Consultants Gordon Graham is a 33 year veteran of California Law Enforcement. His education as a Risk Manager and experience as a practicing Attorney. coupled with his extensive background in law enforcement have allowed him to rapidly become recognized as a leading professional speaker. Gordon's presentation will provide a legal and risk management approach to the elimination of civil liability through preincident plunning and post incident documentation, It also contains a section on recognizing incidents that regularly end up in litigation and what you need to do before lawyers get the case. Sunday afternoon you will slip into bunker gear and experience firsthand the life of a firefighter by partic.ating in a live fire traleiriig session. This program has been specially tailored for politicians by the City of Toronto Fire Services, in partnership with the OAFC. Politicians who have previousty attended this seminar have repeatedly said that it was one of the best conferences and training sessions that they had ever attended! "Let Rte fell you, if wus tough and deritanrtiriy work. 1 wont to thank Chief Boyes, Chief Beckett, the Fite Chiefs Association and the training staff for that unforgettable experience ". The Honourable Peter Fonseca, Minister of Labour Monday afternoon you will have the opportunity to visit the largest Fire Services Trade Show in Canada, where you will be able to see a wide variety of fire vehicles and equipment and talk directly to suppliers and manufacturers. 77 Full NFmi- Department/ Organization Stn t Address Pnone Fax Companions Name of offending the Conlparions PrcgraTi) Mamba Wcarili enliVr [1 n n itle ilylp'rovince Postal Ccde Errai Address DietaryJMedicel Restrictions Additional Trade Show Passes • $20 ea-h SUBTOTAL HST (13 %) Pr/ S7 122021785 Trade show pass is irduded in all Seminar Paciages. Cancellation Polk), Alter April 20, 2012 a cancel3x1ior fee or $130.00 will turliargee. After April 27, 2012 no refunds av l to fssr,,eu. Rooms are filling up fast! Avoid disappointment and reserve your room now. Conference Hotel: Clnubletree tnfernational Plaza hotel 655 Dixon Road, Toronto, ON Reservations: 1 -800- 668 -3656 Rodiss,on Suite Hotel Toronto Airport 640 Dixon Road, Toronto, ON Reservations: 1 -800- 333 -333 3 r: In Torei 2,or 600 Dixon Rd, Toronto, ON Reservations_ 416 -240 -7511 DOUBLETREE 6h Ensure to reference OAFC or Fire Chiefs Conference to receive the conference rates. O `Ms, I with to ehare rry Information w,Ih Conference Sporsars. i1 VISA Cr',dit Card Numb 17 MasterCard ',A Invoice ri Cheque Poyahfe to Ontario Assccvat;or7 of Fire Chiefs fSi9rIatLlre 0"1".'11!" ctl (I riPttittaryrrliritiititrhirtttr,iiiiitiihittfiertti March 31 2012 H Atientiorti CAOICIerk Re: Eigin Area Primary Water Supply System 2011 Conirptierice Report Dear Sir/Madam: Please fled the attached copy of the Elgin Area Primary Water Supply System (EAPtiVSS) 2011 Complier-toe Report.. This report has been prepared by American Water Canada Corp., the Operating Authority for the EAPWSS. The intent of this report is to meet specific reportirig obligations under Soirtedule 22 of aReg 170103 (Drinkirtg-VVater Systems). A copy of this report has bean sent to each of the benefitting rnunicipalities of the Elgin Area Primary. Water Supply System. in additit:in, a copy has been posted an the IRegional Water Supply webslte at tittp,ihrt,,Iw.ixatersu jytondori.dafreports,ntmt arid the report will be made available to the public upon request at the Regional Water Sup �y office in London Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact our office at your earliest convenience, Best regards, 4 h LuA „ureg He4dersor i Water Coinplierice Ccrordinator EJgm Area VVater Supply System Elgin Area Primary Water Supply System Office 519„930i3505 exti 2714 Fax 519 474 0451 gtlanderstt lordonka hit p Jt a tvrsn.ipri y rIrrini°.'1,c,a,' 79 cia The C'tY Cotten Reg oriel: Water' Supply DiYiSiOn 235 Nortti Centre Rd, Suite 200 London Ontario N5X 4( 1 March 31, 2012 Attention: CAO/Cierk Re: Elgin-Middlesex Pumping Station 2011 Compliance Report Dear Sir/Madam: Please find the attached copy of the Elgin-Middlesex Pumping Station (EMPS) 2011 Compliance Report. The EMPS encompasses the Aylmer Secondary pumping station, the Elgin-Middlesex (City of London) pumping station as well as the St. Thomas Secondary pumping station. This report has been prepared by American Water Canada Corp., the Operating Authority for the EMPS. The intent of this report is to meet specific reporting obligations under Schedule 22 of O.Reg 170/03 (Drinking-Water Systems). A copy of this report has been sent to each of the benefitting municipalities of the Elgin- Middlesex Pumping Station. In addition, a copy has been placed on the Regional Water Supply website at http://www.watersupply.london,caireports.html and the report will be made available to the public upon request at the Regional Water Supply office in London. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact our office at your earliest convenience. /Best regards, Greg Henderson Water Compliance Coordinator Elgin Area Primary Water Supply System Elgin Area Primary Water Supply Sys:1,Ai. Office 519.930.3505 ext., 2714 Fax 519,474.0451 ghenderstblordon.ca http://watersopply.loridon.ca' 80 co The City of London Regional Water Supply Division 235 North Centre Rd_ Suite 200 Tendon, Ontario NE-1X 4E7 itiS I t ' y (if Ca kittnitulty Safety 1iiiitie de lit t S e ' c i t t - k te conic] it et a u ta mid Ctil.t.ectiotink Set Aloes et d Services correctiattuels 11,11Itigemetli ().111=11 i Ei (JON SI4L1(t tons d'ufgellue Chit ,t1 to 77 NVellesley SII1Vk't West 77. rue Wellesley (3ticRi Box 222 Tot rift) ()14 10 7A 1N3 C.,P. 222 forealt(1 0I M"72‘ 1N3 liffice of tic Atitnstaril 1)ciuy Ivlinister and °lief B teALI du sock-triiiistre idioini t -t (41(t) 314-3723 EiteRietiile/ Teleeikrtietti (416) 314-375N ARkEiNttl(tituivtatin.eik kitaraa 27 2012 Mr. Walters Ciity of I gin E n 450 Sunset Drive Thc:frrlals, ON N5R 5V 1 Dear Warden Walters: yntautkr45' am wrt 't'rlg to oorigrattliate your ront'elpality r competing he mandatory emergency management program eenen ts r equired ender the Emergency Mat'ingemart and GM% Protecllon Act (EMCPA) and Ontario Regutatiort 380iO4 for 2011. Vour larly rtiod accomplishment, Pa ges, t ahal this Igelflnan t result a commended on t contralto s As a oiree ff 1,-e to be co— ot e 1. safety. government ub and eta- - of goy commitment P prepared cetdrici,, a which love r in wu!'-' the Sam e corn— better 'ill- are - a year that _e share ,rtielpat ouriee comforted tnat of your mu t for 2012. am com,0-* the resderl' I y r efforts, d yot jr ty the bes s an agile ycur coile wish you, Sincerely, Allison J. Stuart \ Assistant Deputy Minister and Chef Comrilunity Emergency Managerrient Coorclitiotor: Sector Field Officer Deputy Chief Joy McLeod 81 RELEA! ICY lit " ICAL April 2, 2012, Thunder Bay, Ontario. The Association of Municipal Emergency Medical Services of Ontario (AMEIVISO) announces that the week of May 19 "' — 26t" will be observed as Emergency Medical Services Week in Ontario. AMEMSO President Norm Gale states, "With the international theme, "EMS: More than a job ... a GALLING'; I encourage communities to learn more about the critical role paramedics and emergency medical dispatchers play in providing pre - hospital care for our citizens. Local services will be visible with appropriate programs, cereill lies, and :ies. The Association is dedicated to the advancement and the promotion of Emergency Medical Services in Ontario. Principal areas of interest include: excellence in customer service, best practices, performance standards and measurements, administrative and operational efficiencies, vehicle and equipment standards, and innovation and policy development and promotion, AMEMSO believes that the quality services rendered by paramedics are an integral part of the continuum of care that is the emergency health care system. The responsibility for providing these services was transferred to municipalities in year 2000. For more information contact: Executive Director Jim Price Email: x.dJemsorltarl^ Tel: (519) 878 -7367 82 ?CO Resident Attraction 'Workshop Page 1 of 1 1 VVO Ari 1 '1 1 1:ti II. 1,:,1.11di ' 1 J\ )1.1 )intinit Ilya CO dr.)k ;:;;I erely, n 1.11H; 1.,,dota in middlesex , http://campaign,r20.con intcontact,co / aceillr=inwciasdab&v=00 1 AR., 4/3/2012 1 EM: i,-116fitkarts.airlcookeryliink.com 1 (0:9 NCIAD, HIX 11'4 '1.1'S 1.01-tV, ONTARIO ID! 2Pil April 3, 2012 Bill Walters, Warden County of Elgin Administration Building 450 Sunset Drive St Thomas, Ontario N5R 5V1 Dear Warden Waiters and Council Members, A Thank you for the honour as having been named Elgin County's 2011 Ambassador for the year. The Ambassador Program offers a unique opportunity to shcwcase Elgin County and I am proud to be a part of this initiative. Promoting the County as a place that is "Progressive ay Nature", is easy. For the more than ten years that I have lived in Elgin, I've grown to value not only the quality of life but also have seen the County's interest in developing initiatives, such as The Arts & Cookery Bank. To be a part of the Ambassador team with other local volunteer executives has been a pleasure and working with the Elgin County Economic Development office always offers opportunities to learn more about the County. While Duncan did not know about the Ambassador honour, it goes without saying that he would have been delighted. For both of us, community is important, and being involved and committed was a huge part of our life together here in Elgin County. I intend to stay committed to my community and Aar to be .21.-Tielt-=!,c.d i iih:r contributing to Elgin County. Here's to another great year! Thank you again for this recognition. To be honoured in this way is humbling and I very much appreciate it. Best regards, cGartland, Chair Cc: Alan Smith Kate Burns 84 COUNTY OF ELGIN By -Law No. 12 -09 "BEING A BY -LAW TO PROVIDE FOR THE ADOPTION OF THE 2012 BUDGET OF THE CORPORATION OF THE COUNTY OF ELGIN AND TO ESTABLISH THE 2012 TAX RATIOS, AND TO ESTABLISH THE 2012 TAX RATES FOR THE COUNTY CONSTITUENT MUNICIPALITIES" WHEREAS Section 289 of the Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001, c.25, provides that the Council of each upper -tier municipality shall in each year prepare and adopt estimates of all sums required during the year for the purposes of the upper -tier municipality; and WHEREAS Section 308(5) of the Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001, c.25, provides that the Council of an upper -tier municipality shall in each year establish the tax ratios for that year for the upper -tier municipality and its lower -tier municipalities; and WHEREAS Section 308(7) of the Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001, c.25, provides that the Council of each upper -tier municipality establish for each property class, a single tax ratio for the upper -tier municipality and its lower -tier municipalities; and, WHEREAS Section 308(15 -18) of the Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001, c.25, provides that the Council of each upper -tier municipality may opt to have certain optional property classes apply within the County. NOW THEREFORE the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the County of Elgin enacts as follows: 1. THAT the 2012 tax ratios for the County of Elgin set out on Schedule "A ", attached hereto and forming part of this by -law, be approved and adopted by Council. 2. THAT the 2012 budget of the County of Elgin set out on Schedule "B ", attached hereto and forming part of this by -law, which incorporates estimates for revenue and for expenditures be approved and adopted by Council. 3. THAT the 2012 tax rates for the assessment in each property class set out in Schedule "C ", attached hereto and forming part of this by -law, be approved and adopted by Council. 4. THAT the large industrial class be chosen as an optional property class. READ A FIRST, SECOND AND THIRD TIME AND FINALLY PASSED THIS 10TH DAY OF APRIL 2012. Mark G. McDonald, Chief Administrative Officer. 85 Bill Walters, Warden. COUNTY OF ELGIN By -Law 12 -09 SCHEDULE A Ratios PROPERTY CLASS 2012 2011 Attachment 1 RESIDENTIAL /FARM 1.0000 1.0000 MULTI - RESIDENTIAL 2.3458 2.3458 FARMLAND AWAITING DEVELOPMENT - RESIDENTIAL 0.5000 0.5000 COMMERCIAL OCCUPIED 1.6376 1.6376 COMMERCIAL VACANT LAND 1.1463 1.1463 INDUSTRIAL OCCUPIED 2.2251 2.2251 INDUSTRIAL VACANT LAND 1.4463 1.4463 LARGE INDUSTRIAL OCCUPIED 2.8318 2.8318 LARGE INDUSTRIAL VACANT 1.8407 1.8407 PIPELINES 1.1446 1.1446 FARM 0.2500 0.2500 MANAGED FORESTS 0.2500 0.2500 86 Attachment 1 V O 6) N CO N- CO d O c ) co I N O 0 O 0 O U) O) D 7 m O) V CO L' O m E N E N a) O CO U) .0 LL U) O) D 7 0 U) N O Q O d O C N E Q O U) U) 0 U) O) D 7 m U) O LL > C > O J E O O E 0 a) Levy Increase Net Income Attachment 1 COUNTY OF ELGIN By -Law 12 -09 SCHEDULE C t0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c E cfl�..—rncn�..—rnaocvcn.— (0 to 6 M 6.— M N 4 M O 6 N 4 L co co U N °a Cl) 000000000000 �, O co co co co co co co co co co co co O O O O O O O O O O O < O O O O O O O O O O O O as ce _ X o < W N O 441. N N X O "'o r- 00 CO 00 O C) Co co W H a o� N X PROPERTY CLASS 0.575531 % RESIDENTIAL 1.350081% MULTI - RESIDENTIAL 0.287766% FARMLAND AWAITING DEVELOPMENT - RESIDENTIAL 0.936840% 0.942490% COMMERCIAL OCCUPIED 0.655776% 0.659732% COMMERCIAL VACANT LAND 1.272937% 1.280615% INDUSTRIAL OCCUPIED 0.827401 % 0.832391 % 1.620019% 1.629790% 1.053029% 1.059381% 0.654804% 0.658753% 0 0 O O N N O O O O 0.143883% c a) O E co CO O cn N Q Q) CD V) CD C L CO (0 (0 a) CO +-' a O a) •5 u U a) (0 _a Q O as a) E 2 .0 L a) X "o 0 LLI . N Q W Z o Q ° c a� J U c O 0 a a) 0 E ZJJ i a) QQQ u) a) L Q E ° W 2 Q 1 co Q U) U) a0 0 x as >, J Q Q M LL cn N Q Q Q (n Q Q Z Z W 7 W c 0 eL I-1-1 Zc) 0 O con Q J Q :E cn z J J Q LaL Q N o CLOSED MEETING AGENDA April 10, 2012 Staff Reports: (ATTACHED) 1) Director of Engineering Services - Municipal Act, Section 240.2 (a) the security of the property of the municipality or local board — Brad Bedford Lease & Central Elgin Lease