June 26, 2001 Agenda
ORDERS OF THE DA Y
FOR TUESDA Y. JUNE 26TH, 2001 AT 9:00 A.M.
ORDE8.
1 st Meeting Called to Ordér
2nd Adoption of Minutes - meeting held on June 12, 2001
3rd Disclosure of Pecuniary Interest and the General Nature Thereof
4th Presenting Petitions, Presentations and Delegations
PAGE #
PRESENTATIONS
9:00 A.M. - Employee Long-Service Recognition
st)
DELEGATION
11 :00 A.M. - Mr. Chester Hinatsu, Director, Ontario Works, Joint Local
Transfer Plan for Social Housing (enclosed separately)
Motion to Move Into "Committee Of The Whole Counci
Reports of Council, Outside Boards and Staff
Council Correspondence seé attached
(see attached
5th
6th
7th
1
2-43
Consideration
Information (Consent
OTHER BUSINESS
Items for
Items for
i)
ii)
44-52
53-97
Agenda)
Statementsllnquiries by
Notice of Motion
Matters of Urgency
Items - see separate agenda
Members
1 )
2)
3)
8th
the Committee Of The Whole
n-Camera
Recess
Motion to Rise and Report
Motion to Adopt Recommendations from
Consideration of By-Laws
ADJOURNMENT
9th
10th
11th
12th
13th
14th
98-101
LUNCH WILL BE PROVIDED
July, 2001 St. Thomas-Elgin General Hospital - Annual Report to Council by County Rep.
July, 2001 Tillsonburg District Memorial Hospital - Annual Report to Council by County Rep.
Aug. 19,20.2 &22/01 Association of Municipalities of Ontario Annual Conference - Toronto
COUNCIL MEETING
EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION - JUNE 26. 2001
HOMES
Home
Elgin Manor
Terrace Lodge
Elgin Manor
Bobier
(full-time)
(full-time)
(full-time)
(full-time)
25 years
20 years
20 years
20 years
Pamela Stewart
Carol Beauchamp
Ernest Schned
Nettie Wieler
Elgin Manor
Terrace Lodge
Elgin Manor
Terrace Lodge
Terrace Lodge
(full-time)
(full-time)
(full-time)
(full-time)
(full-time)
15 years
15 years
15 years
15 years
15 years
Joanne Bolt
Patricia Emerson
Servat Sobhani
Joyce Terpstra
Loree Vandemaele
Elgin Manor
Bobier Home
Elgin Manor
(full-time)
(full-time)
(part-time)
10 years
1 0 years
10 years
Carol Adams
Dianne Uitvlugt
Dorothy Fife
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
me)
(part-ti
10 years
Marilyn Payler
Library
Library
1
(part-time)
(part-time)
15 years
15 years
LIBRARY SERVICES
Mary Brown
Shelley Flemming
REPORTS OF COUNCIL AND STAFF
2001
June 26th
(ATTACHED)
Staff Reports
Exception Lot 11
Minor
Elgin County Tree Commissioner - Application for
Conc. 5, West Elgin
Paqe #
3
Results
Road Sign Replacements - Tender
Technical Services Officer - Year 2001
13
Traffic (Parking By-Law)
Manager of Engineering Services - Pioneer Line, County Road 2, Vegetation
Damages
Engineering Services - Regulation of
Manager of
14
26
System (AMS) Software
Attendance Management
Human Resources
Director of
29
ity Annual Report
Emergency Measures Co-Ordinator - Response to County of Brant Request to
Support Their Lobby to the MOH to Standardize a Cost for Cross-Border Municipa
Services
1999 Long-Term Care Faci
Director of Financial Services -
32
33
Emergency Measures Co-Ordinator - Response to County of Simcoe Request to
Petition to the Discontinuation of Bell Neutral Answering Service (BNAS)
36
"
Director of Homes - Selection of Fundraising Consultant
Assistant
1
Registered Nurse Shortage at Terrace Lodge
2
Director of Homes and Seniors Services
REPORT TO ELGIN COUNTY COUNCIL
From: Rob Lindsay - Elgin County Tree Commissioner
Date: June 12, 2001
Subject: APPLICATION FOR MINOR EXCEPTION. Lot 11,
Conc. 5, WEST ELGIN
Minor Exception from
Commissioner has received an application for
Conc. 5, West Elgin.
Introduction: The Office of the Tree
Mr. Allan Binks to clear 1.01 hectares of bush from Lot 11
Discussion: The proposed clearing is 1.01 hectares in size and the landowner wants to do this clearing to
square the working area of the farm for row crop uses. The area consists predominately of declining scotch
pine, poplar, regeneration of green ash and soft maple. A field inventory on April 27, 2001, did not
determine the presence of any rare or significant tree species. The site is located within 25 metres of a
locally significant wetland.
All neighbours have been contacted regarding this clearing and have no objections to LTVCA
has responded with concerns of a locally significant wetland and the tree commissioner was refereed to the
Ontario Ministry of Natural Resource (OMNR). Upon review with OMNR staff, it was determined that the
area to be cleared was not located in the wetland but was located 25 metres away.
the proposal.
management.
maintain a treed
Conclusion It is my opinion that this application meets the goals of the Elgin County's forest
However we should have some regard towards the locally significant wetland and try to
buffer around the area.
Recommendation: That the application for minor exception be approved subject to a 10 metre wide treed
buffer (250 trees) being placed along the northern edge of the wetland area located on applicant's property
and LTVCA's confirmation of their receipt of funding to replant the buffered area. Further, to maintain the
integrity of the County's "No Net Loss Policy" it is recommended that an additional 1500 trees be replanted
for a grand total of 1750 trees or a donation equivalent to 1750 trees be made to the LTVCA.
Rob Lindsay
Elgin County Tree Commissioner
or Submission
M.G. McDonald. Chief Administrative Officer
3
)-
~
~
')<..
~v
frðposeJ
C(eavÎ;j
/,01 Hct
~AY'eq +0 he
~ RE:p Jc¡n f~d.
as Bu ffev.
w¿;/ Ar~« -It) be
/ /j c /""« 'eel(·
t
tV
Wood {D+
(3¡).p-rev +0 be plc<n-leJ.
¡Ome-f....es Wìcle.
r
Lð+ II
West £f8ì..,
vJooJ ltì+'
..'þ.
,-
r
Co '1 5
k (6 re- Í- ì""e
MARK G. McDONALD ~SO SUNSET DRIVE
)UNfT~I"'NIS",,"rgI\ICU! ST. THOMAS. ONTARIO
(MI'$,}SAN.ORAJ.HEFFREN N5RSVl
IU\JTTCOUNfTcu.~"
PHONE \S19j 631·1460
FAX (519 63.3-7661 q~
,---..', ! \
.:.L.:__~ ° !
THE TREES ACT \'</~J , 200:,...,1 .
!
I:
LTo
APPLICATION FOR MINOR EXCEPTION 'j "'......,.- \>-! \,,-=; .
--_..-.,.._--~ --'..- ..--.-.,..---.........
II We wish to apply for a minor exception from the provisions of the County of Elgin By-Law No.
which restricts and regulates that destruction of trees. In order to be allowed to remove trees as
outlined in this application.
1. NAME(S) OF OWNER(S): /) Ú-.4 ,J tJí"J/d
.
MAILING ADDRESS: ;;.a>{. PIT v;E J(S HFrrYI IJ-vé.
ßliRL. IN Gro ~J t)",-í
/
Postal Code /....7 ¡þ ¡Wi Phone No.o (:ð<¡) sSe;. . 71 J)"
2. LOCATION OF LAND:
Municipality (Town, Village, Township) w£$r e: LG ¡,J
Lot No. II Concession No. t) (k""TVJ<!!é.. L-;r..;"E. )
Lot No. Registered Plan No.
3. Reason for wishing to Remove trees.
-~ SQ<.(I'!K'~ &-JM!..iC I~ 6 ;'f/fE/J O+- F /1-< ,r1
- ;Ž aL/~ f-v f'AA;~ d..c<v~a~ Ý -Æ../ (wd-v ~ ~
~ luJ ~ ~,¿U J~'¡) . 0
4. .. d . b - a ~.$-4 f'~b->- " s(è.,rJ!/!"
Describe species of trees an size of trees to e remove . - ~ a ..
to lar- ;2.-0 - COC"'" 5;,!lß Ie '-fOc"'"
C-V'e-e'1 Jf5~ f () - 70 .-. r1 ()' ~j ha .-vI wood ~-!h"/~
5co-lc f..t ¡;l/11 0:: 2-0 -? ()c VI? £< .~,,- roc.,., ~"",,"'/...I--:
5. Area to be cleared (inmetric)
Length 101-/ Meters YVidth éf7 Meters
Area I. 0 t Aa. (in sqLPáre meters or hectares :5
p,
---.-.....
_ì
,
,"/
ST. THOMAS. ONTARIO
N5R5V1
PHONE (519) 6:11.1460
F"(s~"J;i":·
\1.'·.. .......
,...-..
Ü",: Ii!
"
. 85
MARl< G. "'~OONALD
IU"TTAClM....'nu.t1JlIIO.fl
(MI$,}SANOAAJ.tlEFFAe~
Otf'UTTCClU"TTC1.t"1(
P.
THE TREES ACT
..
______..___~ --I.
APPLICATION FOR MINOR EXCEPTION
II We wish to apply for a minor exception from the provisions of the County of Elgin By-Law No
which restricts and regulates that destruction of trees. In order to be allowed to remove trees as
outlined in this application.
liV'/"5
NAME(S) OF OWNER(S)
1
vé.
¡;) IV-r
Phone No
It v;£ RS H,:rM
tV .f;¿ro ,J
t.:
L
Postal Code
MAILING ADDRESS
LOCATION OF LAND:
Municipality (Town. Village, Township)
2.
LtNë)
e: L6 ¡,J
W £$ ¡-
i<uvrVI<"!E
Concession No.
Registered Plan No.
I
Lot No
Lot No
w,d;~ .A..u-,.." ~
. '0
~~aZ~ Porto-.- v S,e..,M/L
40c">1
trees
CJ
-4~E/'J
t--Jo,<¿K /,.1 (.
wishing to Remove
«tl~ ~
Reason for
~
3.
ha.-d wood ,,-~h;Yf
roC..... ...! '" ... ",I..r,
removeð.
5;,-Nßpk
r!¡7c-J
,,~r
Describe species of trees and size of trees
fo.t:7!c, ~
,
C-V'c-c-n ¡:;7~
5co-lc 4 P;~h<::
to be
4.
C;Oc"'"
vYl
70
2-G-?ÒC
;2-0 -
(0 -
"'?
Area to be cleared (inmetrjc)
l 0 ~/ Meters
5.
6
Meters
(in sqlJáre meters or hectares)
1"7
Width
,
A-a-
t
o
/,
Length
Area
trees?
previously applied for and been granted permission to remove
No ( )
Has the owner
Yes (I") ~
6
removed approximate size of area
If yes, please indicate the purpose to which they were
cleared and date.
t:,t .
r
/'11'7)
g ¿J¡Z~r
t!thc.
/J>-r2
P/fp¡?E RTÝ
ItNoLiL~.;!?
..¡- ON
Names, maiiing addresses and phone numbers of all owners of property which abutts the
land of the owner of the trees in respect to which this application is made as per section
9.2 of the act. (if insufficient space below please attach another sheet of paper)
7.
N6'-:J.CO
'J.;ÐL ;;J.CtJ
N6L :<.ð
IVOl-
Other information deemed pertinent to this application.
Each application must be accompanied by a sketch. no smaller than 20 centimetres by
35 centimetres, showing
8.
9.
The parcel of land that is the subject of this application, clearly indicating the
area proposed to be cleared and the area or trees which will remain.
(a
etc.
buildings on the owner's property and also on the abutting property.
residential agricultural. cottage, commerciai
use of abutting lands (e.g.
(b
(c)
remain if this
means, to clearly
As an on site inspection will be made. Use perimeter of trees which wi
application is granted, must be marked by spraying or some other
indicate during this visit what is proposed to be removed.
10.
Signature of Applicant or
Authorized Agent
7
Note: If this application is signed by other than the owner, written authorization of the owner(s)
must accompany the application. if the applicant is a corporation, the application must be signed
by an officer (end that position must be indicated) end the corporate seal shall be affixed.
trees?
and been granted permission to remove
Has the owner previously applied for
Yes (V) .f(- No ( )
6
If yes, piease indicate the purpose to which they were removed approximate size of area
cleared and date.
t:.t .
r
11'17)
g ¿J€.$r
t!th<G
/..Þr ~
EKIÝ
P.&
It NðrJit:; ¡<!
*" t)tJ
-
Names, maiiing addresses and phone numbers of ali owners of property which abutts the
iand of the owner of the trees in respect to which this application is made as per section
9.2 of the act. (If insufficient space below piease attach another sheet of paper)
7.
Other information deemed pertinent to this application.
Each application must be accompanied by a sketch, no smalier than 20 centimetres by
35 centimetres, showing
8
9
The parcei of land that is the subject of this application, clearly indicating the
area proposed to be cleared and the area or trees which wiii remain
(a)
etc.)
buiidings on the owner's property and also on the abutting property.
residential agricultural, cottage, commercial
use of abutting lands (e.g.
(b
remain if this
means, to clearly
(c)
As an on site inspection wiii be made. Use perimeter of trees which wi
application is granted, must be marked by spraying or some other
indicate during this visit what is proposed to be removed.
10
Signature of Applicant or
Authorized Agent
8
Note: If this application is signed by other than the owner, written authorization of the owner(s)
must .accompany the application. If the applicant is a corporation, the application must be signed
by anofficer (and that position must be indicated) and the corporate seal shali be affixed.
::;
t,J
- tÇ;qB:T€C T J..;¡-N 1>
- 5¡{o,ù ,,.) f, S', t2 Ro '-(IV /) I ,...¡ G LFì"Jj)
¡¿
1I-&-1c5
/'
/....r'/ ~S
,
o'5þ¡ þ,/
(4-r-t4/;./f Vw"c N r f")
N'
(!{)¡JCI£S5/or1 b
VI{òOc<{;/!¿¿ L,¡.J£
.>t ¡"¡/,,!(;.£
,J
0'
"\ 1\
^ /)~ -1 I) /11)1
¡j I) f\1\11~ A
1\ '1/]1 ^f'1,^~111
ti~¡A^ 4 ~11¡j/]
~/(./l /] 'Î /! ~ ^ ¡¡ -1AI\
71' i 'M~· ~ -1/1
'37 IJI¡,: , 1~j1
11~loa 1 ..J
~I~S:I/
~\
~'''c~
I'
\.-o(
~
\:¡
~
,J
s1(;
5DI1Y
~o\C9 vi'
t.\.-\Ý ~/
~
clþg.;ft-
1';:""" <Ý
CciZr>uJ!.-
"/1Af--I'
---
J
<t::
~
,
'<
"<
'"
~
""
H,c>l$'f
Ô
G ft<fl S
v 'b
b
/.. /lJ IE
,
¡4.C'-($t::. 0
~
í3111!-"'¡!
,,"",;1:--
L-~
5<f8:Je<T '-II"';:>
~ _ r-'" f3qMO'NC.5 .
<;u .bf/N0'.t/ dr-
:J .-<a..J J'Ý'ð1'--,11.,....
W~ð
~',J'v::~
~v.
ý~/
1I-&-1c5
/-...,- , / (.ev-.£ <{'
/
O'5jb I µ>j
(¡¡'r-t/fC-/f /'VI ¿ '" r .J)
.J
çLßP-
~ \Þ
toK~'~--
?1M'-~
.---
OAI!ft7
v 'C=J
b
- {';e¡ß:T€C T L;t-.-v 1>
- SHOt,) 1t0 b S 'i f? Ro '-(IV D ( ,.J G Lf\,Jj)
>t: '
;-I¡)!j~t:-
,J
"'\ -1 A
^ /)" II I) /j I) 1
1\ I)~ f\ fI /1 1 A
(\ '1 '11 1\ 1\ 1\ H 1 1
t1 A ~ ~ A 4 (\ /111 tI/
1mi.. 't... /j /j '1 / ~ ^!) t1 /jAI\
~31' t '~.1. A.' ". /I -1! 1
o II 11'_ , 1nJl
-41f2i:--- 10;>' 1 V
'~5"",/
~\
'" /
'" (~
- 1\ ,;;::;/
\.-V
c5<1f!J€<í '-'1-",þ
~ _ rJ" fjuMO (N& S
~ .bf-/N2-".tI.¿;"¡w-
:J --fa-J ~",,-,I-P..-
cb.~¡;¡ ,
. Õ
(!.t'!Jc¿S5Ið,J b
"
s1{)
,\11"~
'SD~
~\I ./
.,ýý~ ~
t7~'
'c-"J--
L-~
(f'.- ~ø
/f~
140USt:.
6
Kel{$ ~ 0
1Ø
"811"-"'>
c:
5
~
N
VlCòc>c</'P/!U_ LI>-'£
/..//,1 tf
<1;:
<::,
~
J
<t
-::,
,
"<
'1(
"
G
Ifrm¿/-fh,CNr JÞ-
3
\
'1)1\
IIJ
f k:- 1~;;'----71
Sl'
t
- -.- - - - - -
f,lfNP 5 e; () ~¿£-1-/i?INc, /1~E/t {EXI?4N/)'£~ Þ ~~ I
IQ.da-v- is w-:.(c5
~j If e¡z.~~
O?/µ/ 1 1
Jl-rm!.liht~NT Jt;-
3-
\
'\)1\
II¡
ff'~ N'~'
51'
t
- -"- - - - - -
f,l(~ tð 5 £ () ~éE-1-r.:ING /f~E/t {E'~..t?4"¡f)'£¡f r ./k(¡lJ~ r
la~ ßw-:Jc5
,/
kr I', ~"ú-S
O?¡P/ 12
REPORT TO COUNTY COUNCIL
PETER DUTCHAK,
ENGINEERING SEI
JUNE 13, 2001
YEAR 2001 ROAD SIGN REPLACEMENTS - TENDER RESULTS
TECHNICAL SERVICES OFFICER
RVICES DEPARTMENT
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Introduction
As part of the approved 2001 Capital Program, road signs in the Municipality of Dutton I Dunwich and in
the Township of Southwold will be replaced and updated to current standards and policies.
Discussion / Conclusion
Scugog Signs has already been selected by Council to supply all of the signs for this project. A wood
post supplier has been selected to supply approximately 500 posts for this project. Staff has ordered
these posts in advance of this report to ensure availability and delivei)l, Materials will only be accepted if
they comply with the quality expected. A summary of quotation results are as follows for your interest.
$11,8
$ 12,112.38
$12,413.68
$13,536.08
Dutton Building Prod
Geerlinks Home Hardware
Elgin Co-op Services
Copp's Buildal
Those results are as follows
$28,2
$ 31,431.25
$ 31,685.38
Quotations have been received from potential sign installers.
~
Mobile Striping and Sweeping Li
Elgin Contracting and Restoration Limited
ADDA Construction
Mobil Striping and Sweeping submitted the lowest price to complete the sign installations. They
completed last year's sign installations in the Township of Malahide and the Municipality of Bayham
(inclusive of al
18
827
Recommendation
THAT Dutton Building Products supply sign posts for their quoted price of $11
taxes), and;
THAT Mobile Striping and Sweeping be selected to replace road signs for their quoted price of
$28,221.25 (inclusive of all taxes)
APPi: ,U8MISSION
CLAYTON D. WATTERS, MANAGER
ENGINEERI RVICES
RESPECTFULL Y SUBMITTED
PETE DUTC K,
TECHNICAL SERVICES OFFICER
3
1
MAR LD
CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER
of
page
Reports\2001\Sign Replacemeots.doc
F:\USERS\DEPlìROADS\Counci
REPORT TO COUNTY COUNCIL
FROM: CLAYTON WATTERS, MANAGER
ENGINEERING SERVICES
12,2001
JUNE
DATE:
SUBJECT: REGULATION OF TRAFFIC (PARKING BY-LAW)
Introduction
Presently the County of Elgin has in force By-Law No. 90-48 for the Regulation of Traffic. This
by-law regulates areas for no parking, one way streets, areas for parking meters and the fine for
the violations.
Discussion
Itis desirable to have one generic by-law in place for use by the County and the municipalities for
ease of consistent enforcement of regulations by the OPP County-wide. There have been
several meetings held with Municipal and County staff and a "model" by-law has been drafted by
the County Solicitor reflecting the input from these meetings. All participants have been asked to
approve the wording for the "model" by-law. Once the wording is approved, each municipality will
pass an adopting by-law and the documents will be forwarded to the solicitor general's office for
approval. Once approval is received from the Solicitor General's office, then the fee structure can
be finalized. After all approvals are received, Schedule B, restricting parking areas will be
incorporated into the by-law.
Conclusion
The wording in the draft "model" by-law requires County Council approval as the first step in the
process of passing a comprehensive by-law. Once the wording is approved, the process will
enter its next phase.
regulation of
for the
"model" by-law
of the attached draft
Recommendation
That County Council approve the content
traffic.
APPROVED FOR SUBMISSION
RE;J~:SUBMnED
CLAYTON D. WATTERS, MANAGER
ENGINEERING SERVICES
4
1
Corporation of the County of Elgin
By-Law No. EG1
Elgin enacts as follows:
The Council of the Corporation of the County of
PART "A"
DEFINITIONS
this By-Law:
"ANY PROVISION OF THIS BY-LAW' means any provision of this By-Law for the
contravention of which the Municipal Act permits a procedure for the voluntary payment
of penalties out of court.
DEFINITIONS in
1
"AUTHORIZED SIGN" means any sign or device placed or erected on a highway under
the authority of this By-law by the Roads Superintendent for the purpose of regulating
warning or guiding traffic.
BICYCLE" is a vehicle as defined under the Highway Traffic Act.
"BOULEVARD" shall be construed to mean that portion of every highway within the limits
of the County of Elgin which is not used as a sidewalk or a travelled roadway.
"
which buses stop to
at
"BUS STOP" means a part of a highway designated as a point
take on or let off passengers.
"COMMERCIAL MOTOR VEHICLE" means a motor vehicle having permanently
attached thereto a truck or delivery body and includes ambulances, hearses, casket
wagons, fire apparatus, buses and tractors used for hauling purposes on highways
"CORNER" with reference to a highway intersection means the point of intersection of
the prolongation of the lateral curb lines or in the absence of curbs the prolongation of
the edges of the roadways
Elgin
the Corporation of the County of
CORPORATION" means
"
"CROSSWALK" means,
(i) that part of a highway at an intersection that is included within the connections of
the lateral lines of the sidewalks on opposite sides of the highway measured from
the curbs, or, in the absence of curbs, from the edges of the roadway, or
any portion of a roadway at an intersection or elsewhere distinctly indicated for
pedestrian crossing by signs or by lines or other markings on the surface.
Council of the Corporation of the County of Elgin
the current
COUNCIL" means
)
(
CURBLlNE" means, where the curb is constructed "curbline" shall be construed as
meaning the edge of the travelled portion of the highway.
"DESIGNATED PARKING SPACE" or "DESIGNATED DISABLED PERSON PARKING
SPACE" means a parking space located on any public highway under the jurisdiction of
the Corporation of the County of Elgin or on any property owned or occupied by the
Corporation of the County of Elgin or any local board thereof and designated for parking
of vehicles and marked by an official sign indicating such space to be for the sole use of
vehicles displaying a disabled person parking permit.
"DISABLED PERSON PARKING PERMIT" means a disabled person parking permit
issued under the Highway Traffic Act or a permit, numbered plate or other marker or
device issued by another jurisdiction and recognized under the Highway Traffic Act.
5
Elgin
Corporation of the County of
Bv-Iaw EG1
"DRIVEWAY" means improved land on a highway which provides vehicular access from
the roadway to a laneway or a parking area on adjacent land.
the combined weight of vehicle and load
GROSS WEIGHT" means
HANDICAPPED PERSON" means an individual who has been issued a disabled
person parking permit by the Province of Ontario and who has met the requirements of
the Highway Traffic Act.
"HEAVY TRUCK" means any commercial motor vehicle which has a rated gross vehicle
weight exceeding 4,535.92 kilograms (10,000 pounds) according to the current permit or
vehicle registration which has been issued under the Highway Traffic Act, or its foreign
equivalent for such vehicle, regardless of the actual weight of such vehicles, but does
not include a vehicle operated by or on behalf of the Corporation or a school bus which
is in the course of transferring children or mentally retarded adults to and from schools.
"HIGHWAY" includes a common and public Highway, Street, Avenue, Parkway,
Driveway, Square, Place, Bridge, Viaduct or Trestle, any part of which is intended for or
used by the general public for passage of vehicles and includes the area between the
lateral property lines thereof.
"HOLIDAY" includes Sunday, New Year's Day, Good Friday, Easter Monday, Victoria
Day, Dominion day, the day proclaimed as a Civic Holiday, Labour Day, Thanksgiving
Day, Remembrance Day, Christmas Day, Boxing Day, the day proclaimed as birthday of
the reigning sovereign, and any day appointed by proclamation of the Governor General
or the Lieutenant-Governor-In-Council as a public holiday or for a general fast or
thanksgiving and the next following day when any such holiday falls on a Saturda
Sunday, and any day appointed by proclamation of the Municipal Council.
y or a
"INTERSECTION" means the area embraced within the prolongation or connection of
the lateral curblines or, if none, then of the lateral boundary lines of two or more
highways that join one another at an angle, whether or not one highway crosses the
other.
"LANEWAY" means improved land adjacent to the highway which provides access from
the highway to a parking area on adjacent land
"LOADING ZONE" means the part of a highway set apart for the exclusive purpose of
parking a vehicle to load or unload same
"METERED PARKING SPACE" means a parking space for which a meter or other
mechanical device is provided or any space adjacent to which a parking meter or other
mechanical device is located.
"MOTOR VEHICLE" includes an automobile, motorcycle, motor-assisted bicycle and any
other vehicle propelled or driven otherwise than by muscular power, but does not include
the cars of electric or steam railways, or other motor vehicles running only upon rails. or
a motorized snow vehicle, traction engine, farm tractor, self-propelled implement of
husbandry or road-building or winter control machine.
Ontario
the Ministry of Transportation of
means
"
M.T.O
OFFICER" means the By-Law Enforcement Officer of the Municipality or any other
person authorized by Council and charged with the enforcement of this By-Law.
Ontario
"PARK" or "PARKING", when prohibited, means the standing of a vehicle, whether
occupied or not, except when standing temporarily for the purpose of and while actually
engaged in loading or unloading merchandise or passengers.
2
OFFICIAL SIGN" means a sign approved by the Ministry of Transportation of
6
1
Elgin
Corporation of the County of
Bv-Iaw EG1
stopping of a vehicle
"PARKING INFRACTION" means any unlawful parking, standing or
that constitutes an offence.
"PARKING METER" means a device that shall indicate thereon the length of time
which a vehicle may be parked which shall have as a part thereof a receptacle for
receiving and storing coins, a slot or place in which such coins may be deposited, a
timing mechanism to indicate the passage of the interval of time during which the parking
is permissible and which shall also display a signal when said interval of time shall have
elapsed.
during
"PARKING METER COVER" means a hood, bag or other covering for a parking meter
that is placed over a parking meter by an authorized official to indicate that a parking
meter is not to be used.
POLICE OFFICER" means a member of the Police Force having jurisdiction In the area
"ROADWAY" means the part of the highway that is improved, designed or ordinarily
used for vehicular traffic, but does not include the shoulder, and, where a highway
includes two or more separate roadways, the term "roadway" refers to anyone roadway
separately and not to all of the roadway collectively.
such parts of a highway as are set aside by the Municipality for
use by the general public for the passage of pedestrians.
SIDEWALK" includes al
use of pedestrians or
"STAND" or "STANDING", when prohibited, means the halting of a vehicle, even
momentarily, whether occupied or not, except when necessary to avoid conflict with
other traffic or in compliance with the directions of a constable or other police officer or of
a traffic control sign or signal.
"STOP" or "STOPPING", when prohibited, means the halting of a vehicle, even
momentarily, whether occupied or not, except when necessary to avoid conflict with
other traffic or in compliance with the directions of a constable or other police officer or of
a traffic control sign or signal.
"TIME" means that where an expression of time occurs or where any hour or other
period of time is stated, the time referred to shall be standard time except in periods
when daylight saving time is in effect, in which periods, it shall be daylight saving time.
"TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL" means any device, manually, electrically or
mechanically operated for the regulation or control of traffic.
the
to proceed in
turning of a vehicle within a roadway so as
the
U-TURN" means
opposite direction
"VEHICLE" includes a motor vehicle, trailer, traction engine, farm tractor, road-building
machine and any vehicle drawn, propelled or driven by any kind of power, including
muscular power, but does not include a motorized snow vehicle, the cars of electric or
steam railways running only upon rails.
2. ABBREVIATIONS
In this Schedule to this By-Law the following abbreviations and symbols stand for the
words respectively set forth opposite thereto as follows:
7
1
3
Avenue
Boulevard
Place
Street
Crescent
Court
Drive
Road
Ave.
Blvd.
PI.
St.
Cres.
Ct.
Dr.
Rd.
(a)
Elgin
Corporation of the County of
Bv-Iaw EG1
Hour
Millimetre
Centimetre
Metre
Kilometres Per
Kilograms
mm
cm
m
km/h
kg
(b)
Ante Meridian
Post Meridian
AM
P.M
(c)
DISTANCES:
Where a distance is used in this By-Law as part of a prohibition of parking or stopping
within a specified distance of an object, structure, land or a part of a highway, such
distance shall be measured:
(a) from the limit of the road allowance; or
(b) from a point referenced to a lot line or limit; and
(c) all distances/dimensions are measured in the metric measurement of
metres.
3.
INTERPRETAT
In this By-Law
(a) words purporting the singular number or the masculine gender only include more
persons, parties or things of the same kind that one and females as well as males
and converse.
a word interpreted in the singular number has a corresponding meaning when
used in the plural.
"May" shall be construed as imperative.
definitions and interpretations not otherwise included herein but otherwise
provided for in the Highway Traffic Act, RSO 1990, Chap. H. 8, or any successor
legislation thereto, shall extend and apply to this By-Law.
ION - GENERAL
(b)
(c)
(d)
4.
5. SCHEDULES ADOPTED:
All schedules referred to in this By-Law shall form part of this By-Law and each entry in a
column of such a schedule shall be read in conjunction with the entry or entries across
therefrom, and not otherwise
PART "8"
GENERAL TRAFFIC
APPLICATION OF BY-LAW:
This By-Law applies to all highways under the jurisdiction of the Corporation of the
County of Elgin.
6.
AUTHORITY TO IMPLEMENT TERMPORARY PROVISIONS:
The By-Law Enforcement Officer is hereby given authority as the occasion arises and
when required in order to assist in the care of moving traffic, to set apart and indicate or
designate on highways in the Municipality space or spaces for the parking of a vehicle or
vehicles by causing lines to be painted, signs to be erected or otherwise upon the
pavement, curbs or surface of the roadway or immediately adjacent thereto, or on the
highway or highways or portions of highways, as a temporary provision for the restriction
of parking on highways or portions of highways and to make such other temporary
provision for directing the traffic as may be necessary. Such temporary changes shall
not be effective after the next subsequent Council meeting unless confirmed by
resolution of the Council at such meeting, which resolution shall stipulate the length of
time such change(s) shall be in effect.
7.
8. BY-LAW SUBJECT TO THE HIGHWAY TRAFFIC ACT
The provisions of this By-Law are subject to the provisions of the Highway Traffic Act
RSO 1990, Chap. H. 8, as amended and any successor legislation thereto.
8
1
4
Elgin
Corporation of the County of
Bv-Iaw EG1
9. DISPLAYING FOR SALE:
No person shall park any vehicle on any highway for the purpose of displaying the same
for sale.
10. EMERGENCY FIRE REGULATIONS:
No driver of any vehicle shall drive his vehicle within 150m of any building which is
fire; nor shall he drive his vehicle over or across any line of a hose laid by the Fire
Department, and at the direction of the Fire Chief for the area, the Police authority shal
place signs on the highway on which the building on fire is situated, and any adjoining
highways which may be deemed necessary for the purpose, closing such parts of
highways to traffic until the fire is out, and no driver shall pass such sign or approach
nearer to the fire than such sign.
on
FUNERALS AND PARADES:
No person shall drive any vehicle, except emergency vehicles, between the vehicles in
any duly authorized parade or funeral procession on any highway, provided the vehicles
in such parade or procession are properly designated.
11
12. INTERFERENCE WITH AUTHORIZED/OFFICIAL SIGNS AND PARKING METERS:
No person shall alter, deface, remove or destroy any sign erected by the Municipality or
any pavement lines or other marks for guiding the parking of vehicles or the regulations
of traffic, or deface, injure, tamper with, open, wilfully break, destroy or impair the
usefulness of any parking meter, and no person shall alter, interfere with, or change the
position of any such sign, line or other mark or parking meter, unless he has been duly
authorized so to do.
13.0BEDIENCE TO ALL PARKING METERS, SIGNS, AND SIGNALS:
It shall be the duty of all persons using the highways to observe the directions indicated
by any permanent or temporary meters, signs, or signals erected or placed for the
purpose of regulating or directing traffic.
14. PLAYING ON PAVEMENTS
No person shall engage in any game or sports activity upon a roadway and no person
upon roller skates or skateboards, or sleigh, express wagon or riding in or by means of
any coaster, toy vehicle or similar device go upon any roadway
15.PROHIBITION OF THE REPAIRING, WASHING, WAXING OR GREASING OF
VEHICLES:
No person shall make use of the roadway for the purpose of washing, waxing, greasing
or repairing any vehicle, except such emergency repairs as are necessary to enable the
vehicle to be removed from the highway and disabled vehicles shall be removed or
caused to be removed from the highway by the driver or owner without delay.
16.NO DRIVING ON SIDEWALK, PATH, OR BOULEVARD
No driver of any vehicle shall drive within, upon, across or along any sidewalk, path or
boulevard except at a driveway.
17.ABANDON VEHICLES:
No person shall abandon any vehicle, including any vehicle that is incapable of being
propelled or driven by any kind of power, on or near a highway or roadway.
18. UNAUTHORIZED SIGNS
No person shall place, maintain or display on any highway any unauthorized device
which is an imitation of, or purports to be, or resembles any official sign or signal, or
which purports to direct parking or the movement of traffic or the actions of operators of
vehicles. Any such device shall be deemed a public nuisance and any Police or other
Officer authorized to enforce this By-Law may remove the same without notice
19.BUS STOPS
(i) Buses operated over a highway in the Municipality shall take on or discharge
passengers only on the right-hand side of the bus. When stopping all buses shal
stop in such a manner as not to obstruct traffic.
9
1
5
Elgin
Corporation of the County of
Bv-Iaw EG1
When an authorized bus stop sign IS on display, no vehicle shall stand any closer
than 15m before the said sign
(ii)
PART C
REGULATED PARKING
no person shall stop or
20.GENERAL PARKING REGULATIONS:
Subject to or in conjunction with the provisions of Sections 21
park a vehicle or permit a vehicle to be stopped or parked:
On or within any sidewalk, crosswalk, crossover or boulevard;
In front of or within 1 m of any lane, driveway or alley entrance;
Except at points where parking is otherwise designated, with the right-hand
wheels of the vehicle at a greater distance from the curbline than 0.15m or in
Winter, subject to Subsection (5), as nearly within such distance as the conditions
of the highway permit;
On the roadway side of a vehicle stopped or parked at the edge or curb of a
highway;
At the edge or curb on the left side of the roadway having regard to the direction
such vehicle was proceeding except where parking is permitted on the left-hand
side of the roadway of a highway designated for one-way traffic;
In such position as to obstruct traffic;
Within 8m of any Fire Hall on the side of the highway on which the Fire Hall is
located or within the 30m of such Fire Hall on the opposite side of the roadway;
On any street within 8m of the projection of the curbline of any intersecting street
except where such intersection is visibly and lawfully designated as a "Bus Stop"
at which intersection all vehicles shall be parked in accordance with the
instructions set out on the designating sign or signs;
On any bridge, subway and/or any approach thereto;
Within 3m of the point of the curbline which is nearest any fire hydrant;
Within 2m of the spacè on the same side of the highway directly in front of the
entrance to church, hospital, hotel, theatre, hall or other public building where
large numbers of people assemble, except while actually taking on or discharging
passengers, other than a bus in a bus stop, or other than a taxi-cab in a taxi-cab
stand, when any such stop or stand has been officially designated and
appropriately signed;
Within 15m of an intersection with Signal Light Traffic Control System installed;
Within 15m of the nearest rail of a level Railway Crossing;
In a position or place that prevents or is likely to prevent the removal of any
vehicle already parked on the highway;
On any highway where the travelled portion of the roadway is less than 6m wide;
Within 15m of a pedestrian crossover;
Alongside or adjacent to the tracks of any railway;
Within a loading zone;
On any lands owned by the Municipality where signs prohibiting stopping or
parking have been erected;
Where appropriate signs are erected and on display at any place or location for
emergency vehicles only;
Where appropriate signs are erected and on display on highways and between
the limits set out respectively in Schedule "A" hereto.
(1 )
(2)
(3)
(4)
(6)
(7)
(9)
(10)
(11 )
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)
(18)
(19)
(21)
(20)
(5)
(8)
21.SPECIFIC PARKING REGULATIONS
(1) Church Services
Where appropriate signs are displayed and authorized by a By-Law of the
Municipality, persons in attendance during church services and church functions
are exempt from general parking regulations set out above
Restricted Parking
Subject to Subsection 21 (3) through Subsection 23(8) inclusive below, and where
appropriate signs are erected and on display, no person shall park a vehicle on
any highway at the side and between the limits set out respectively in Columns
20
6
(2)
Elgin
Corporation of the County of
Bv-Iaw EG1
1,2, and 3 of Schedule "8" to this By-Law during the times or days set out In
Column 4 of the said Schedule for a longer period of time than that set out in
Column 5 of the Schedule.
Maximum Parking Time Limits
No person shall permit a vehicle to remain parked or standing upon any part of
any street in the Municipality for a period longer than five (5) hours.
(3)
Overnight Parking on Municipal Roads
Notwithstanding any provisions of this Section, no vehicle shall remain parked or
standing upon any part of any street in the Municipality between the hours of 3:00
A.M. and 5:00 A.M.
(4)
Parking on One-Way Streets
Notwithstanding Section 20 (3) hereof, where Council, under this By-Law, has
designated certain streets as one-way streets, vehicles parking on the left-hand
side of the street shall park with the left-hand wheels of the vehicle at not more
than 0.3m from the curbline or, in winter, as nearly as possible within such
distance as the conditions of the highway permit.
(5)
Parking in Space Contro
(i) Parking Times
No driver of a vehicle shall park such vehicle in a parking meter zone
between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m., Mondays to Fridays
inclusive, and except where such days are legally and lawfully proclaimed
holidays, unless the driver of such vehicle deposits in the parking meter
provided for the parking space the sums as indicated in Columns 1 and
of Schedule "D" hereto and thereafter activates the meter.
2
ed by Parking Meter
(6)
Maximum Parking Limit on Meter
(a) No driver of a vehicle shall allow such vehicle to remain parked for a
longer period than that for which payment has been made in the
form of coins deposited in the parking meter or meters, provided,
however, that this shall not prevent the driver of the vehicle from
using the unexpired time remaining in the meter from its previous
use without depositing a coin therein.
(ii)
No driver of a vehicle shall allow such vehicle to remain in a parking
space for a longer period than the maximum time permitted on the
parking meter.
(b)
No driver of a vehicle shall park such vehicle in such a manner that
it is not wholly within the area designated as a parking space, and if
the vehicle is of such length as to prevent it from being parked within
one parking space, then the person parking same shall make the
necessary deposit of coins in the parking meter or meters for
adjoining parking space(s).
(c)
Parking Procedures at Meter
No driver of a vehicle shall park such vehicle in a parking space unless the
front and rear of such vehicle is alongside or as close as practical to the
parking meter provided for such space.
)
(
Parking Meter Locations
The highways or parts of highways set out in Column 1 of Schedule "D" of
this By-Law are designated as parking meter zones between the limits set
out in Column 2 of the said Schedule.
(iv)
Parking Meter Rates
The parking meter rates, as set out in Column 2 of Schedule "D" of this By-Law
for the type of parking meter set out in Column 1 shall be the parking rates for on-
street parking as approved by Council.
1
2
7
(v)
Elgin
Corporation of the County of
Bv-Iaw EG1
Parking of Heavy Trucks and Buses
(i) No person shall park a heavy truck, or a bus, or a school bus, or allow a
heavy truck, or a bus, or a school bus to stand on any highway in any
residential zone within the territorial limits of the Municipality.
(7)
The provisions of subsection (i) of this section do not apply to prohibit the
parking or standing of any heavy truck upon a highway in any residential
zone while the operator thereof is actually engaged in the delivery of goods
or services to any premises within such zone or to prohibit the parking or
standing of any bus or school bus upon a highway in such zone while the
operator thereof is actually engaged in the embarking or disembarking of
passengers within that zone.
)
(
Parking in Designated Disabled Person Parking Space
(i) Subject to that set forth in subsection (ii) to this section, no person or
organization shall park a vehicle in a designated disabled person parking
space unless a currently valid disabled person parking permit has been
issued to that person, organization or to a passenger being picked up or
transported in the vehicle and such permit is displayed on or in the vehicle
in accordance with the requirements of the Highway Traffic Act.
(8)
Vehicles displaying currently valid permits, numbered plates, or other
markers and devices bearing the international symbol of access for the
disabled and issued by other jurisdictions are entitled to the same
privileges as vehicles displaying disabled person parking permits issued by
the Province of Ontario.
(ii)
PART "0"
STREET DESIGNATIONS AND TRAFFIC SIGNS
22. ONE-WAY STREETS
The highway set out in Column 1 of Schedule "C" to this By-Law, within the limit set out
in Column 2 of the said Schedule, are hereby designated for one-way traffic only in the
direction set out in Column 3 of the said Schedule.
23. EXEMPTION - MUNICIPAL VEHICLES PERFORMING WORK ON HIGHWAYS:
The provisions of Part "C" of this By-Law do not apply to vehicles of the Municipality
where such vehicles are actually engaged in the performance of cleaning, maintenance
duty, repair, construction, snow or ice removal or other work on any highway or any
vehicle under contract to the Municipality and engaged in any of the aforesaid activities.
PART E
PAYMENT OF PENALTIES OUT OF COURT
24. PROVISIONS FOR PENALTIES:
A specified penalty payable out of court within seven days time may be imposed for the
contravention of any provision of the By-Law that constitutes a parking infraction, by the
inclusion in a parking infraction notice under Part II of the Provincial Offences Act of the
words and penalties set out in Schedule "F" of this By-Law.
25. METHOD OF PAYING VOLUNTARY PENALTY:
An early penalty payment out of court may be made on or before the date specified on
the parking infraction notice by cheque or money order payable to the Corporation of the
County of Elgin sent by prepaid mail to an address or post office indicated on the parking
infraction notice and on such payment being made, no further proceedings will be taken.
22
8
Elgin
Corporation of the County of
Bv-Iaw EG1
26. DEFAULT IN PAYING VOLUNTARY PAYMENT:
If default is made in paying a penalty out of court in accordance with this part, any fine
imposed under this By-Law for thé contravention thereof shall be recoverable under the
provision of the Provincial Offences Act, all the provisions of which shall apply.
PART "F"
GENERAL PROVISIONS
27.GENERAL PENALTY:
Except where otherwise expresslY provided by this By-Law or the Highway Traffic Act,
every person who:
Contravenes any provision of the By-Law; or
(a)
s parked or stopped in contravention of any
that
s the owner of a vehicle
provision of this By-Law;
(b)
Is guilty of an offence and on conviction IS liable to a fine not exceeding Two Thousand
Dollars ($2,000) exclusive of costs.
28.ILLEGALL Y PARKED VEHICLES:
Where a vehicle has been parked, stopped or left standing in contravention of this By-
Law, the owner of the vehicle, notwithstanding that he was not the driver of the vehicle at
the time of contravention of the By-Law, is guilty of an offence and is liable to the fine
prescribed for the offence unless, at the time of the offence, the vehicle was in the
possession of some person other that the owner without the owner's consent.
29. REMOVAL OF VEHICLES
Any officer duly appointed or otherwise holding jurisdiction for enforcement of the
provisions of the By-Law and/or Highway Traffic Act, upon discovery of any vehicle
parked in contravention of this By-Law may cause it to be moved or taken to a placed or
stored in a suitable place and all costs and charges for removing, care, and storage
thereof, in any, are a lien upon the vehicle, which may be enforced in the matter
provided by Section 52 of the Mechanics' Lien Act or any successor legislation.
30.AUTHORITY TO ENFORCE THIS BY-LAW:
Any By-Law enforcement officer duly appointed by the Municipality and any police officer
holding jurisdiction within the territory limits of the Municipality is authorized to enforce
the provisions of this By-Law. In addition, any other officer appointed by the Municipality
for purposes of enforcement of the non-moving violations of this By-Law is authorized to
enforce such non-moving violations. For the purposes as so set forth, the said officers
shall be considered Provincial Offences Officers for the purposes of enforcement of this
By-Law.
ENFORCEMENT - PROVINCIAL OFFENCES ACT (ONTARIO):
Subject to any provisions set forth above, enforcement herein shall be pursuant to the
provisions of the Provincial Offences Act (Ontario), and any conflict between the
provisions of the By-Law and the said Provincial Offences Act (Ontario), save and except
that relating to payment of penalties out of court, shall be resolved in favour of the said
Provincial Offences Act (Ontario).
31
32. EXCESS COINS AND PARKING METERS
Where a person deposits one or more coins In a parking meter in excess of that required
for the parking time allowed by the meter, no change shall be remitted and no increase
in parking time shall be allowed.
things and the Mayor
and under seal of the
23
33. EXECUTIVE ACTS AUTHORIZED:
The Mayor and the Administration are hereby authorized to do all
and the Administrator are hereby authorized to execute on behalf
Municipality any document necessary to give effect to this By-Law.
9
Elgin
Corporation of the County of
Bv-Iaw EG1
are Inserted for
of the By-Law but
34. HEADINGS NOT PART OF THE BY-LAW:
The headings in the body of this By-Law form no part
convenience of reference only.
35. DEVIATION FROM FORMS
Where a form of words or expressions are prescribed in any schedule to this By-Law,
deviations therefrom not affecting the substance or calculated to mislead do not vitiate
them.
36.CONFLlCT WITH HIGHWAY TRAFFIC ACT:
In the event of conflict between the provisions of this By-Law and the Highway Traffic
Act, the provisions of the Act prevail.
37. DATE EFFECTIVE - FORMER BY-LAWS REPEALED:
This by-law shall come into effect on a date to be specified by Council, upon which
effective date all other by-laws pertaining to the regulation of traffic and parking on
highways in the County that are inconsistent upon the terms thereof, including but not
limited to By-law as amended, shall be repealed.
READ a first time this
Warden
this
this
time and finally passed
Administrative Officer
me
ti
READ a second
third
READ a
Chief
"A"
SCHEDULE
By-Law No
PART "A" - DEFINITION OF ROAD ALLOWANCES
PART "B"
When properly worded signs have been erected and are on display no person shall park a
vehicle on the highway or part of the highway known as
PART "C'
The following locations are hereby designated as Crosswalk Zones of 2.0m In width
24
10
Corporation of the County of Elgin
Bv-Iaw EG1
SCHEDULE "B"
By-Law No.
RESTRICTED PARKING
::;olumn 1 Column 2 Column 3 Column 4 Column 5
-liqhwav Side TolFrom Times of Da Time Lenqth
SCHEDULE "C"
By-Law No.
DESIGNATED ONE-WAY STREETS
Column 1 Column 2 Column 3
Hiqhwav To/From Direction
SCHEDULE "D"
PARKING METER RATES
Column 1 Column 2
Maximum Time Period Parkinq Meter Rate
SCHEDULE "E"
PARKING METER LOCATIONS
Column 2 Column 3
Side From To
SCHEDULE "F"
PENAL TIES - PARKING INFRACTIONS
-
Offence Section Fine
- - Set Voluntar'
11
25
REPORT TO COUNTY COUNCIL
FROM: CLAYTON WATTERS, MANAGER
ENGINEERING SERVICES
19. 2001
PIONEER LINE. COUNTY ROAD 2, VEGETATION DAMAGES
JUNE
SUBJECT:
DATE
Introduction
The County of Elgin is in receipt of a letter from a concerned ratepayer on 29318 Pioneer Line, in the
Municipality of Duttonl Dunwich. This letter is in regard to the purported over use of road salt on the road
system.
Discussion
The attached letter raises concerns about the over use of salt on the environment. The County of Elgin
provides the training each year on winter control. The training involves but is not limited to the review of
the County of Elgin By-Law 96-15, which establishes the standards for the minimum and desirable
roadway service levels and the application rates for de-icing. We provide specific training on the
application of road salt as part of our due diligence obligation.
It is difficult to prove that salt has damaged the vegetation. For your information, MTO policy is that al
damages are to be proven in the courts, therefore, monies are only awarded after it has been proven
through litigation that the application of road salt caused damages.
Furthermore, if this claim was accepted, the County would be subjecting itself to a virtual plethora of
claims including people assuming rust on their automobiles was caused by municipal road salt.
Conclusion
The County of Elgin takes proactive steps for the application of salt to maintain the county roads as per
our minimum maintenance by-law. Plants can be damaged by many factors and it is advisable that the
property owners prove this through the court system, otherwise, many other claims may arise, as this
will be a precedent setting case for the County of Elgin.
ratepayer on Pioneer Line in
the a concerned
the letter from
Recommendation
THAT the County of Elgin acknowledge
Dutton I Dunwich; and
MARK MC
CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER
no action be taken
REiJ:t;;UB
CLAYTON WATTERS, MANAGER
ENGINEERING SERVICES
MITTED
That
26
2001
I
Date: June
TO: Mark Mac Donald'
FROM: Lisa Henson
29318 Pioneer Line
R.R. #1 Dutton, ON
(519) 762-3640
CONCERNS: Over use of road salt is contaminating the Environment.
History of the Contamination.
I have lived for twenty-two years at this location. 29318 Pioneer Line, Dutton. We have
continually tried to plant trees or shrubs to act as a barrier to wind on the south side of our
property adjacent to the road.
Each and every Cedar tree we have planted has died or is dying, even though they are
supposed to be resistant to road salt. I have replaced them twice but they have never thrived.
Cedars planted at the same time but in different locations are now up to 8 feet high.
This past spring so far I have pulled out 75 dead rose bushes, some ornamental shrubs, small
trees, a Hoopsi Blue Spruce 80 feet from the road, and a cherry tree. Many of the 310 aluminum
markers are corroded and the soil has heavy white deposit on it. The mushroom compost was
only put on last summer and there was a white crust on top.
I have spent thousands of dollars on my property to create a healthy climate and environment.
Road salt is destroying it.
I have a map of the dead plants in my garden and it indicates a definite pattern. The trucks
with the large blades direct the snow & salt in specific directions and that "kill pattern" is now
showing up in my garden. I have seen the snow thrown from the blades of the trucks and land
30 feet and more away from the road side. The air is very heavy and moist and with the wind it
carries the salt in the air for hundreds of feet further.
I have bushes 80 feet away from the road which have been burned or killed by salt.
I have added gypsum to my soil to neutralize the soil but am afraid that the contamination may
cause further damage. Salt stays in the soil for years and now all of my barriers are gone. The
few trees I did have were cut down by Ontario Hydro due to interference with high voltage lines.
My garden is now very vulnerable. If the excessive use of road salt continues I will lose every
plant in my garden.
I am also worried that it is contaminating my ground water and affecting the wildlife.
I have taken the appropriate precautions to protect my
I wonder if road salt is also damaging my health as well.
27
This is damaging the environment.
garden and my plants are still dying.
Request:
commitment to.
Environmental
my garden from this year's salt.
Reduce and monitor the use of road salt.
2. Replace the cedars with large enough trees to protect
I
I felt it
information on road
& Mr. Hull
After having conversations with Mr Loveland, Mr Van Brenk, Mr. Walters,
necessary to include a little extra information on road salt damage.
Included with this letter is a map of the garden, pattern of damage,
salt damage to trees
& misc.
Mr. Rein Van Brenk
Mr. Ken Loveland
Mr. Cliff Walters
Mr. Mike Hull
cc.
Sincerely
28
-
Counci
Report to Coun
FROM: Paul Vandenberg
June 14, 2001
SUBJECT: Attendance Management System (AMS) Software
DATE:
NTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND
While the transition to the Attendance Management System (AMS) has not been easy, it has clearly
achieved the mandate: to reduce employee absenteeism. Employees are now recognising their obligation to
their employer to be at work each day, and to be accountable for all manageable absences. Attendance has
improved within the County, reducing our wage and benefit costs.
Since the implementation of AMS, the Human Resources depar1ment has taken on the responsibility of
tracking all attendance issues. This process is completely manual ftom the aspect of tracking employees in
the AMS to the notification of supervisors. As with all manual systems, we have encountered several
drawbacks, the system is slow, time consuming and not without errors. Over the past two years it has
occupied approximately 30 % of a full-time employees duties. We anticipate that through staff re-allocation
we will realize these savings. The other issue is accuracy. We have had situations where the information
produced was not correct, and employees have had interviews when they should not have. Although
measures have been taken to minimise these issues, the fact is that the credibility of the system has been
affected which has caused a number of concerns among the bargaining units.
DISCUSSION
The Human Resources depar1ment utilises the Kronos software TKC to track our employees time and
attendance for payroll. Kronos has a module specifically designed for TKC to track attendance. This
module, called NexTrak, will track all aspects of the County of Elgin's AMS policy and produce the
required letters and reports. This will eliminate the time consuming manual system currently in place.
The cost for NexTrak is $16,500.00, negotiated down IS % ftom the quoted price, which includes the
software, programming our AMS policy into the software, installation and staff training. There is also an
annual maintenance fee of $1,300.00, which allows for changes to the program to reflect updates to the
policy. (see attachment #1 for the comparison of the manual and automated systems)
The AMS system has proven to be an effective policy to reduce employee absenteeism, which in turn
reduces the employer's costs. The credibility of the AMS system relies on current information that is
accurate. The NexTrak system gives us a tailored package, addressing our needs in regards to AMS, which
allows us to create efficiencies while at the same time taking out the errors and delays incurred with manual
OF2
PAGE
29
DRAFT
late reports for the supervisors
also be used to produce perfect attendance reports and
tracking. NexTrak will
in the Homes.
CONCLUSION
Kronos developed NexTrak to meet the growing demands from business to create an effective
and efficient monitoring system for AMS policies. The unions are constantly looking at
weaknesses with the AMS system to discredit this policy. An automated system eliminates the
manual processes, reducing errors and delays in tracking employees' attendance.
The AMS administration needs to:
1. Be effective: current information that is easy to access and review
2. Have credibility: the information and reports generated must be accurate
3. Be cost-efficient:Utilise staff to promote the policy and HR initiatives rather than manually
count the absences
manual
The cost savings, produced by the AMS policy, is partially being eroded by our inefficient
system. The NexTrak system address all these issues.
RECOMMENDATIONS
THAT the County of Elgin purchases the NexTrak system, at the upset limit of 16,500.00, to
automate the current manual tracking system used for the administration of the AMS policy, and
that funds for this purchase, including the annual maintenance fee, be allocated from the
automation budget.
mission by Mark McDonald
Chief Administrative Officer
PAGE20F2
30
DRAFT
PROPOSED AUTOMATED
SYSTEM
ATTACHMENT #1
CURRENT MANUAL
SYSTEM
Kronos TKC tracks
employee hours worked
Kronos TKC tracks
employee hours worked
·
Absent slips are
completed by
Departments
NexTrak:
. processes employee absences
as per our AMS Policy
produces reports for the
supervisor
.
·
r---------
: HR Receives and
: processes absent slips +
: verifies with Kronos TKC
,
r-----------~ .
: Employee absences are :
, '
: tracked manually and :
: updated every pay- ¡
'------------~-------------
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
Letters are created
manually to be sent to
the supervisor
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
..
·
..----
: Supervisor verifies data :
, '
: with employee to ensure :
: the accuracy :
I______--------------------~
·
Letter sent to the
Employee
Letter sent to the
Employee
COST OF NEXTRAK:
Initial (one time) Cost:
Software Programming + Training =$16,500.00
300.00
$1
+ Annual Maintenance Fee
1
3
ESTIMATED ANNUAL COST:
Wages and benefits X 30 % time for
AMS is approx. $ 17,000.00 per year
REPORT TO COUNTY COUNCIL
Deputy Treasurer
John David Huether,
FROM
12,2001
1999 Long-Term Care Facility Annual Report
June
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Discussion
The Ministry of Health requires an Annual Report on all funded homes for the
aged on an annual basis. This report has been completed and audited for the
period covering January 01, 1999 to December 31, 1999. All finalized annual
reports are on file and available for review in the Financial Services Department.
1999 Long-Term Care
bmission
Recommendation
That, the Warden and CAO. be authorized to sign the
Facility Annual Report for the Ministry of Health.
Respectfully Submitted
CAO
Mark
Director of Financial
Linda Veger,
Services
.-=G
32
John David Huether
Deputy Treasurer
County Counci
To:
Karen Dunn. Emergency Measures Coordinator
From:
May 15, 2001
Response to County of Brant Request to Support their Lobby to the
MOH to Standardize a Cost for Cross-Border Municipal Services
Date:
Re:
Introduction:
Attached is a copy of a resolution from the County of Brant seeking our Council's support
to lobby the Ministry of Health to implement a standardized cost for cross-border municipal
ambulance service
Elgin/St. Thomas ambulances are assigned to calls that sometimes originate or terminate
outside the boundaries of Elgin/St. Thomas. The recent policy implemented by Council
limits the use of vehicles for non-emergency transfers in other municipalities; however,
there are times when ambulances return residents, are required to provide standby, or
have to respond to emergency calls outside of Elgin/St. Thornas jurisdiction. All these
types of calls have a cost, which is paid for by the UTM in which the call originated.
Discussion:
The 1999 Ministry estimated standards (our latest update) indicate the average cost per
call of an ElginlSt. Thomas vehicle is $307.90 per trip. This cost is calculated by dividing
the cost to run the service by the number of calls per year. In comparison the average
cost per call of a Middlesex vehicle is $150.72 per trip.
On average, larger centres have a lower cost per ca because they have higher call
volumes - this drives the costs per call down. Larger centres, such as London and
Brampton, also have the Medical Mecca's where large volumes of patients are being
transported to and from
they
large medical facilities
jurisdictions
While these centres reap the financial benefits associated with
are also subject to paying for return ambulance trips from their
In the past the Ministry did not worry about which municipality an ambulance was drawn
from to service the larger centres To date, Elgin County vehicles are still being relied
upon to service other UTMs.
In 2000, the Elgin/St. Thomas fleet transferred 1248 patients from other UTMs, 953 of
these transfers were in London/Middlesex. In return, the Middlesex fleet transferred 86
patients in ElginlSt. Thomas. Within the same year other UTM services transferred 357
Elgin patients. The Oxford services provided Elgin/St. Thomas with 234 transfers in the
Bayham area
33
2
At the present time, if the UTMs do not come to an agreement with respect to a cost for
cross-border municipal service, the default provision of the Ambulance Act will be
implemented. This provision stipulates that ElginlSt. Thomas transfers are worth $307.90
per trip. This revenue is factored in to our CRF calculations. Any negotiated reduction in
the cost per trip would negatively affect our revenue stream
Conclusion:
The issue of cross-border municipal transfers is not an issue that the Provincia
Government should have a part in determining. The individual providers of the services
should be able to come to some sort of agreement amongst one another, and if an
agreement cannot be reached the default provision of the Ambulance Act should be
invoked
Since it was the Ministry of Health who created the larger medical centres, and reduced
services of local hospitals in smaller centres, larger centres such as London and Brantford
should look toward the Ministry of Health and Long-term care for subsidies, if they feel
they are paying too much
If larger UTMs with lower cost per call rates are unhappy with the cost of an ElginlSt.
Thomas trip, they should be encouraged to up-staff their fleet to the standards required to
meet their ambulatory needs.
Thomas
the ElglnISt.
remain In
This will also imply that ElginlSt. Thomas ambulances wi
catchment area to service residents of the community.
ambulance billings
Brant regarding cross-border
the County of
Recommendation:
THAT the resolution from
be received and filiad, and
the
to
the Emergency Measures Coordinator be forwarded
THAT a copy of the report from
AMO and the County of Brant.
34
All of which is respectfully submitted
Page 666
05/05
P
1 519 633 7661 CLERK-Elgin CO
FAX NO. 416 971 6191
ASSOCIATIon OF?->
AMO
WED 09:48 PM
EST
65/69/61 22:23:32
MAY-09-0
COLJn~ Admlnh.ndvc Sundlnf
1249 Colbarac Sacct Wo.st
Hichwll)' 59. Mount Vc:rnon
MaUini:' AddrtMl
P,O,90)1'\61)
B",Ion!, On","o I'DI' ,\.O
May 8, 2001
the following reoommendation of the
Please be advised the Brant County Council approved
Amb\llanCð Committee at their May 1, 2001 meeting;
COlSlIty of Orant
!l..e.p. (Ron) Eddy, M.yor
1tIcL: l'kbhr.. Cldc:t.Admll\btr..1t1vc:Oniccr
(519)449-1.451
151~)44~-1~J4 (FA).)
e-n".'1 hl'"Jll'lr/ðu::ollrn\l hn.tH on Cß
Wþb Site blTf):IIW~.:.S$1I11y..Jm.~
from
received
calls
respond to 6\1
requlre~ ambulances
to the
that arO! billed
to
in crOS5-border ambulance SBNlces
Act
And Whereas this commonly results
recipiel1t municipality;
"Whereas the Ambulance
Di&patch Servlœs;
ae
cal
And Whereas these cosls are based on the provider munlc1pallty's aV6ra~e cest per
prescribed in Part IV of Ontario Regulation 129/99 made under The Ambulance Act;
to municipalities
And Whereas the COSU; for these cro$s-border ambulance service5 ar~ unfair
with lower ¡¡verage costs per call;
request the
Initiate the
Brantford
Health to
Therefore be It resolved that the County of Brant and the City of
Association of Munioipalities of Ontario to lobby the Ministry of
standardization of cross-municipality ambulance seNices CO$t5;
And that this fesolutlon be forwarded to municipalities province wide fOf endorsement and for
the purpose of lobbyIng tht! AsGoclatlon of Municipalities of OntariQ and the Ministry ot Health
to stendardize these costs."
the
Ontario to lobby
We would appreciate the assislance of the Association of Municipalities of
MInistry of Hoalth to 5tendardlze cross-municipality ambulance servic~ costs.
f;.urs
~~ Carman
Deputy Clerk
County of Brant
truly,
u.J
Hen. Tony Clement, Minister of Health and Long-term Care
Dave Levac, M.P.P., Brant Riding
Toby Barrett, M.P.P., Haldlmand-Norfolk-Br3nt Riding
Kevin Bain. Clerk, City of Brantford
All municipalities in Ontario
cc
35
Elgin County Counci
To:
Karen Dunn
From:
the
to
May 7, 2001
Response to County of Simcoe Request to Petition
Discontinuation of Bell Neutral Answering Service (BNAS)
Date:
Re:
from the County of Simcoe petitioning our
to discontinue the BNAS.
Introduction:
Attached is copy of a letter and council report
support to prevent the CRTC from allowing Bell
Discussion:
At a recent ElginlSt. Thomas 911 Steering Committee meeting, and at City and County
Council meetings, members of the Committee and Councillors expressed a desire to test
the market, and seek viable alternatives for the answering service at a lesser cost.
Recently, agencies such as police and fire departments, which are not motivated by profit
have begun providing this service. With the recent emergence of alternate Primary
Answering Services, this application presents the residents of Elgin County and the City of
St. Thomas with an opportunity to reduce costs.
the BNAS
to discontinue
Recommendation
THAT County Council, take the official position that if Bell wish
they should be permitted to do so, without objection; and,
the sarne
take
to
Counci
Thomas
St.
the City of
encourage
THAT, County Counci
position
All of which is respectfully submitted
~
aSl:!res Co-ordinator
Chief Administrative Officer
36
Elgm County Counci
To:
Karen Dunn
From:
the
Introduction:
Attached is copy of a letter and council report from the County of Simcoe petitioning our
support to prevent the CRTC from allowing Bell to discontinue the BNAS.
to
May 7. 2001
Response to County of Simcoe Request to Petition
Discontinuation of Bell Neutral Answering Service (BNAS)
Date:
Re:
Discussion:
At a recent Elgin/St. Thomas 911 Steering Committee meeting, and at City and County
Council meetings, members of the Committee and Councillors expressed a desire to test
the market, and seek viable alternatives for the answering service at a lesser cost.
Recently, agencies such as police and fire departments, which are not motivated by profit,
have begun providing this service. With the recent emergence of alternate Primary
Answering Services, this application presents the residents of Elgin County and the City of
St. Thomas with an opportunity to reduce costs.
the BNAS
to discontinue
wish
Recommendation
THAT County Council, take the official position that if Be
they should be permitted to do so, without objection; and,
the same
take
to
Counci
Thomas
St.
the City of
encourage
THAT, County Counci
position
All of which is respectfully submitted
37
~
Co-ordinator
\'
es
5- 4-01 3:07PM:County ot Simcoe :7057263991 ~ 1/ 6
"
~ ADMINISTRATION CENTRE
~" 1110 Highway 26 West
~ MIDHURST,ONT. LOL lXO
(705) 726-9300 FAX (70S) 726-3991
Be.",. AN, (?OS) 729·2294
COUNTY OF SIMCOE
FACSIMILE COVER LETTER
TO: Upper Tier Municipalities - Ontario
FAX PHONE NO.:
TOTAL NO. OF PAGES INCLUDING THIS COVER: 0
DATE: May 4,2001 TIME
FROM: Clerk's Department
MESSAGE/REFERENCE:
ORIGINALS TO FOllOW: YES 0 NO 0
CONFIDENTIAL
Release of this information may breach legislation and
may cause legal implications to the County of Simcoe and others.
-
38
Corporation of the
COUNTY of HURON
524-8394
524-2044
(519)
(519)
Fax
N7A 1M2
CLERK-ADMINISTRATOR
Court House, Goderich, Ontario,
June 8, 2001
Canadian Radio and Telecommunications Commission
Ottawa, Ontario
K1A ON2
2001
"'I'M I",,"" ,"" .., "1"
1VVlÐ~\' ij 'J{ tE¥" tLi:Â t'tJ
ßlJMI""Sl''''''''!\þ¡: ~I::'~"'f"~'"
rU ij J\'jf nti}.i~iJl"" v!:""n~hA«>~
n
-
JUN
Sir/Madam
Dear
the Bel
from
Application by Bell Canada to Withdraw
Neutral Answering Service
Re
On June 7, 2001, Council of the County of Huron adopted the attached report from
the Committee of the Whole meeting of May 22, 2001. The specific recommendations
approved were
That the County of Huron petition the Canadian Radio and Telecommunications
Commission to deny the application by Bell Canada to withdraw from the Bell
Neutral Answering Service.
1
That the Association of Municipalities of Ontario and the upper tier
municipalities in Ontario be asked to endorse this recommendation and forward
their position to the Canadian Radio and Telecommunications Commission
2
Parliament be so notified
Parliament and Provincia
That the Local Members of
3
Yours truly,
A)r;;1urray !
k-Administrator
J
Huron-Bruce
Association of Municipalities of Ontario
Upper Tier Municipalities
The Honourable Helen Johns, M.P.P
Paul Steckle, M.P., Huron-Bruce
JAM/b
enc
cc
Committee of the Whole
May 22, 2001
Neutral Answering Service
Bel
5
BACKGROUND
On April 6 2001 Bell Canada requested authorization from the Canadian Radio &
Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) to withdraw the BNAS service
Ontario municipalities and Bell Canada agreed to implement and provide 911 Public
Emergency Response Service (PERS) services to their respective residents. The 911
PERS system facilitates an easy to remember one number approach to accessing fire,
police and ambulance services. The Ontario 911 PERS system is the cornerstone of the
provincial first response operation and has resulted in more efficient dispatch of
emergency personnel, especially in rural Ontario. The Canadian Radio Television and
Telecommunication Commission (CRTC) approved the 911 PERS system citing that it
would be in the public interest to permit manual access by the Municipality to Bell's
Automatic Location Identification database
Under the 911 PERS Agreement the Ontario municipalities have certain obligations,
one of which is to provide and operate a Central Emergence Reporting Bureau (CERB)
for the 911 serving area
During the initial implementation of the 911 PERS system, Bell Canada agreed to
provide and operate, on an as requested basis, the CERB on behalf of many Ontario
municipalities. The municipalities paid Bell Canada for providing and operating the
CERB in accordance with the rates and charges as set out in Article 3 of General Tariff
Item 141 5 as approved by the CRTC
The CERB service provided by Bell Canada commonly referred to as Bell Neutral
Answering Service or (BNAS) has become an Integral part of the Ontario 911 system
BNAS provides Ontario municipalities with the following benefits
affordable and economical solution to distribute 911
especially in non urban areas where the call volume is low
provide an
calls
.
maintains a consolidated approach to the delivery of 911 services
through one vendor {existing 911 network is comprised of Bell
infrastructure and databases;
.
3
retain the BNAS service as
recommends that Bell Canada
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The County of Huron strongly
an essential public service
it w be seen as the
network. Since the
have been no citizen
Should the CRTC permit Bell Canada to withdraw from BNAS,
critical first step in the dismantling of the entire Ontario 911
inception of the Huron County 911 program in 2000, there
complaints with respect to CERB operations provided by BNAS.
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
The County of Huron currently pays $87,366.46 annually. If the County of Huron
elected to directly deliver the CERB services it is estimated that the annual CERB costs
would increase by 580 percent to approximately $507,000 annually. This estimate
includes the required 10 dispatchers and computerloffice equipment This number was
estimated as the minimum requirement by the County of Simcoe
intent
level
n a letter of March 12, 2001, Bell Canada advised the County Engineer of their intent
n an alert of May 3, 2001, AMO advised municipalities of the concerns and their
to represent municipalities. Huron's concerns were expressed to AMO at a staff
RECOMMENDATIONS
That the County of Huron petition the Canadian Radio and Telecommunications
Commission to deny the application by Bell Canada to withdraw from the Bell
Neutral Answering Service.
1
That the Association of Municipalities of Ontario and the upper tier
municipalities in Ontario be asked to endorse this recommendation and forward
their position to the Canadian Radio and Telecommunications Commission
2
Members of Parliament and Provincial Parliament be so notified
Carried
Moved by J. Hogan
Seconded by L. Steffler
That the recommendations be approved
That the Local
3
REPORT TO COUNTY COUNCIL
Marilyn Fleck, Director of Homes and Seniors Services,
Irene Rimnyak, Assistant Director of Homes and Seniors Services and
Sonia Beavers, Administrative Officer, Homes and Seniors Services.
FROM
2001
SUBJECT: SELECTION OF A FUNDRAISING CONSULTANT
June 21st
DATE
ntroduction
Council has previously authorized staff to develop and issue a "Request For Proposals'
regarding the feasibility of conducting a capital fund raising campaign for the new Elgin
Manor. We have received four proposals from firms specializing in such endeavours and
have interviewed the proponents. This report discusses staff findings and recommendations.
Discussion
The main goal of the exercise is to determine the true fundraising potential for the Elgin
Manor project. To accomplish this task, fundraising consultants were asked to submit bids on
conducting a feasibilitylplanning study with an estimated goal of $1 m. Firms were also asked
to provide estimates of the cost of implementing the findings of the study.
sted below:
assess the image of the Elgin Manor project
determine the community support for the project
identify the willingness for prospective key supporters to participate
assess the goal of the campaign
examine the administrative implications for implementing the campaign
evaluate the competition for dollars
provide recommendations on how best to achieve the campaign goal
assess the availability of leadership and volunteer support
determine the likelihood of pacesetting gifts
provide a fund raising plan and organizational structure
determine the appropriate time period for the campaignì
I
n essence. each firm was asked to bid on providing the services
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
sis
Each bid proposal was analyzed according to the following criteria: relevant experience in the
field; completeness of presentation; dependency on County staff resources; understanding
of requirements; familiarity with market situation; price; and, most importantly, personal
suitability.
The Anal
2
$15,000.00 plus GST and expenses
$17,000.00 plus GST plus expenses
plus an operation allowance of $1 ,500
$18,000.00 plus GST all inclusive
$18,000.00 plus GST plus expenses
The Bids
One to One
DVA Navion
The Goldie Company
Anne Moore and Associates
Conclusion
After having reviewed each proposal and interviewed the principals, it is safe to conclude that
all four firms are qualified to conduct the planning study. The second phase of the project is
the professional assistance in the implementation of the capital campaign and those costs
identified by the bidders vary from $5,000 per month to $18,000 per month based on our
needs for consultant involvement. However, staff recommend that the most qualified to suit
our needs, based on the above-mentioned criteria is Anne Moore and Associates. Staff were
particularly impressed with their genuine passion towards seniors' needs, their depth of
experience, their creativity and their personal suitability.
Recommendation
THAT Anne Moore and Associates be retained to conduct the Capital Campaign Planning
Study for the new Elgin Manor Building Project on behalf of the County of Elgin at the upset
fee of $18,000 plus GST and expenses, and provide professional consulting for the
implementation of the Capital Campaign as identified by our needs and according to their
submission dated June 1 ih, 2001; and,
the Building Reserve Account.
be allocated from
That the funding for this project
ALL of which is respectfully submitted
(J IÞCJJ
Marilyn Flecl"
Director, Homes and Seniors Services
Mark G. McDonala,
Chief Administrative Officer
Approved for
Irene Rlmnyak,
Assistant Director,
Homes and Seniors Services
Sonia Beavers,
Administrative Officer,
Homes and Seniors Services
REPORT # 2 TO ELGIN COUNTY COUNCIL
FROM: Marilyn Fleck, Director of Homes and Senior Services
SUBJECT: Registered Nurse Shortage at Terrace Lodge
DATE: June 26, 2001
Backaround/lntroduction:
As council is aware there is a much publicised nation wide shortage of Registered Nurses. The
County of Elgin Homes along with other facilities is experiencing difficulty in recruiting Registered
Nurses as there are so few available. To add to this issue is our efforts to ensure that we retain
the nurses that we currently employ. Terrace Lodge is presently in a crisis situation related to
Registered Nurses.
Discussion/Conclusion:
During the past 6 months efforts to recruit the 2 regular part-time RN vacancies at Terrace Lodge
have proven unsuccessful. Currently there are 4 full-time RN's and 1
Part-time RN.
Statistics:
1. During the past 6 weeks (April 30 to June 14) 40 RN shifts were filled by RPN's.
2. During the same time frame there was 56.5 hours of overtime paid out to RN's and
RPN's to cover the required shifts.
3. On 3 occasions there was no RN available and the Director of Nursing was on-call.
The registered staff (RN's and RPN's) at Terrace Lodge are aware of this situation and have
been most supportive. Both groups have been willing to work together to ensure that the Home is
staffed to meet the increasing complex needs of our residents: It is evident that the nursing
shortage will continue for some time forcing us to be creative in developing new ways of recruiting
RN's. Moreover, we must be mindful of the possibility of losing our current RN's due to illness,
stress, and other job markets. At the present time there are RPN's available, and we must
recognize the contribution that they offer to quality resident care.
Recommendation:
THAT Director of Homes and Seniors Services and the Director of Human Resources be
authorized to hire 2 regular part-time RPN's for a 6 month term to fill the RN vacancies and that
we continue to explore options available for recruitment and retention of Registered staff.
Respectfully submitted, Approved for Submission
ÎJ1~r0 (tm1J
Marilyn D. Fleék
Director of Homes and Senior Services
2001
CORRESPONDENCE - June 26th
Items for Consideration - ATTACHED
Mr. George MacDonald, Mayor, Town of Midland, with a resolution petitioning the
Provincial Government to provide legislation to municipalities permitting the option of
determination of opening prayer by municipal councils.
1
Ms. Kathy Reid, Clerk-Administrator, Township of Stirling-Rawdon, with a resolution
concerning the deferral of radio communication fees collected by the Federal
Government and municipally owned vehicle licensing fees collected by the Provincial
Government.
2
Mr. Edward R. Sajecki, Assistant Deputy Minister, Ministry of Municipal Affairs and
Housing, with an invitation to attend the Ontario Smart Growth strategy with Ministry
staff on Thursday, June 28, 2001, 1-4 p.m County of Middlesex Building, London
3
Theresa Wates, Circulation Control, Municipal World Inc., with information concerning
the Municipal World Charter Program available to subscribers of the magazine
44
4
Page 1J1J2
01
P
CLERK-Elgin Co
lR2
8191
!A~
418 97
The Corporation of the Town of Midland
575 Dominion Avcnue, Midland, Ontario
Phone: 705-526-4275
Fax; 705-526-9971
Emai c1cr1cs@!()wn.midJ¡JJjJl.on.ca
1 519 633 7661
FAX NO,
ASSOCIATion OF?->
AMO
08:58 PM
EST
1J6/IJB/1J1 22:IJB:1J2
FR
.
JUN-08-0
June 6, 2001
of All Municipalities of Ontario
Procedures in the Conduct of Council
Part of Council
Members
Use of Or.nin¡: Prayer
Meetings
he Mayors and Cound
To
He:
~.s
Wo are s(:eking enabling logislation that gives Municipal Councils the right to deterrníne tho !ISO
of an opening prayer of their choosing. We trust you will find the following resolution self-
explanatory and seek yuur support in petitioning the senior levels of government for the
permissive legislation. Without it, for cxample, COllneils cannot recite the Lord's PI'ayer as pe¡' a
ruling of the Onlario Court of Appe,,! (Freitag ats Town of Penctanguishene, 1999)
Thcre is. of course, the clemont of tradition and concern, too, as to the potential impact on other
Christia.n obsc,'v<lllces such as recognitloll of Christmas Day. Easter Sunday alld Good Priday as
statutory holidays. 1f government offices can be closed in recognition of Good Friday, a
Christian holiday, it scems consistent and reaôonable that a government body can recite the
Lord'.I Prayer as a matter of procedura I choice
WHIŒEAS the M,micipal Act of the Statutes of Ontario provides that Councils for
municipalities shall adopt a proccdural by-law for governing the calling, placc, and proceeding uf
mce.tìngs, and;
detennining their
of
WHF.REAS Council herein deems it e~pòdie"t alld a right to have the optioll
opening prayer during the pl"Oceeding of their Council meetings, and;
this
WHEREAS it is herein deemed e~pedicn! to pursue pertincnt and permissive legislation 01
matter in viðw of a Sepwmbcr 23, 1999 Ontario Court of Appeal ruling;
NOW TnER1~FORE ßE IT RESOLVED THAT
The Ontario Legislaturò be herein petitioned to provide the nccessary legislation to
municipalities that would permit the determillation of an opening prayer by Municipal
Couucils in the proceedings of Council meetings
seek any required support in all
to ensure the continuod spirit and
The Ontario .cgislature be herein petitioncd to
appropriate manner from the Government of Canada
ÎnH'tlt of the Canadian Charter of Rights and l'reedoms
2.
Support for this motion be sought from the Association of Municipalities of Ontario, al
Memhers of the Provincial Legislature, all municipalities of Onlario, and local members
of Parliament.
3
Mayor
Ckorg¢ MacDonald
45
Tb.II ØlJ4It!tbl 16 pruvldrd undl't tQntrøCI.1I g [l1I.Ìd. .t:NÌ« b)'IhÐ o(iglblll.lmg OfþQitaUQa, aud d(lql 1101,
m.a,_fUr rl:n«t .lIe vil:"". "II' PI1:I.ÎUoÐII ut lbc AuðcialWa ot MIUllt.lpllitlu Ør Qntario (AMO),ltJ
r,ub:;\diArv fOLIII'I~lliu, O(Jt'~", dltt(l<lt.I or ø¡~ntl'_
Page 883
CLERK-Elgin Co
1 519 633 7661
ASSOCIATion OF?-)
EST
86/88/81 22:88:46
02
P.ØØ2/002
P
619
6191
416 97
TO:416 971
FAX NO,
613-395-0864
RAWDON
AMO
STIRLING
FR 06:59 PM
JUN-ØS-2ØØl 14:59 FRDM:TWP
JUN-08-0
---,,-~~ o/g9J
P,O. BOX 40, STIII~ING, ONTARIO MOM ,eo
r61~1 ~D$oOee4
FAX
June 7, 2001
of the Township of.Stù:ling.Rawdon
To All Ont8J:io MUI];cipnIities
At a rneeting held on June 4,2001 the COUIJci
pas$«I the following resolution
"That the Council of the Corporation of the Township of. Stirling-Rawdon requeslS the
indefmite deferraJ of radio communicntion fees, for municipal purposes, collected by the
Federal Government and furthcnnore (he indefinite deferraJ of municipality oW1led
vehicle IicenSÙ11! f<:c:s collcctc:d by thc Provincial Government respectively.
safcty and
Wberca.q deferraJ of $uc!:I fees aíds in the economic development of the health.
~lfm:e that thcse services provide to municipalities
And whereas the sllvings to munlcipaJ governments for radio licensing and vehicle
licensing go directly to reserve funds for fire protection police set\lices, publie works
departments and pubHc transportation s~rvices,
and equipment that
And wher~a..~ those reserve funds provide the necessary ".lIicles
c.nhancc the public welt';¡re. safety and protection
Now it be resolved that the Counei] for the COlpOration of tbe Township of Stirling-
Rawdou supports enactment of FedcraJ legislation to defer collecting licensing fees of all
rnulj,kipally owncd services rC(uiring radio communications including fire protection,
police services, public works services and transportation services
And funhcr resolved thal said council supports enoctment of ProvinciallegisJation to
defer collecting licensing fees for all municipally owned vehicles as pet ¡,¡bove,
And further resolved thllt the savings from said lìcensing fees be pUI directly into the
reserve funds of ~ sen-icc, respective to the savings, to be used {OJ: the procurement of
and the upgradÍlls to the vehicles and equipment necessary to pmvide these services.
And fw:tber resolved to so notify the Premier of Ontario, the Minister of Transportation.
the Association ofMunicípalíties ofOntlllio, the Ontario Fire Mauhal's Office, local
MPP's, the Federal Minis!e¡: ofJndustry, loca! MP's
And further resolve to petition fellow municipaUtics of Ontario, through AMO, to support
this resolution and forward this support 10 their respective Federal and Provincially
elected represen1atives." C'anicd.
would be appreciated if this resolution could be considered by your Counel
[I
YO\lU truly,
Kathy Reid, AMCT, CMO
Clcrk-Admin.istralor
46
~~-
~h~
ntlli m"h~r;111$ flrov~ll<\r ~'mlt>lc£ ata iJldd Benke- lIy th~ origlrllulnp: Ot'g:anÎ:Ul\!oD, I1nd does MI
IIcccnnrily rdl~d 11t~ ~ ¡1~"''1 tlr fI(\ïllíllll~ or Iho ^S~(~iLlI;(nI ut MLlldct(lalíli,,~ flf Onlfltj) (AMO), ~
"1.1\\'il¡¡¡.£!iromllntli";~!l~t~n, tli[rc~t~~~~~:."
Q.(fa
~ko-k
- ~?'W
o
® Ontari
Ministère des
Affaires municipales
et du Logement
Division des relations provinciales-municipales
777, me Bay 14c étage
Toronto ON M5G 2E5
Téléphone: (416) 585-6600
Télécopieur: (416) 585-6467
Ministry of
Municipal Affairs
aud Housing
Prov¡ncial~Municîpal Relations Division
777 Bay St 14th Fir
Toronto ON M5G 2E5
Telephone: (416) 585-6600
Fax: (416) 585-6467
2001
June 13
2001
JUN 14
Mark G. McDonald
Chief Administrative Officer
The County of Elgin
450 Sunset Drive
ST. THOMAS ON N5R 5Vl
Dear Mr. Mark McDonald:
On behalf of the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing, and further to our Minister's letter to your head of
council on May 22, I would like to invite you and your head of councilor your designate( s) to discuss the
government's Ontario Smart Growth strategy with ministry staff. You may wish to send additional staff or
council members, but space may be restricted to 2 persons per municipality, deperíding on the availability of
space and to ensure all municipalities are represented.
As you know, the government is developing a long-term Smart Growth strategy to promote and encourage
growth in ways that will sustain a strong economy, build strong communities and support a healthy
environment. Making Smart Growth work will require collaborating and forming partnerships and integrating
decisions on development, infrastructure and the environment. Municipal input will be essential to the success
of an Ontario Smart Growth strategy.
On May 18, 2001, the government began a stakeholder consultation process on Smart Growth which will visit
17 regions across the province. Municipal leaders and staff have been invited to these regional sessions. As a
follow-up to these meetings, our regional staff are organizing meetings with heads of council and senior
municipal staffto discuss in greater depth the government's goals and principles for Smart Growth as they
relate directly to l11unicipalities. The municipal consultatiQn me~ting in your region win be held «)ll
Thursday June 28, from 1:00 - 4:00 p.m. at the Middlesex Room of the Middlesex Building, 399 Ridout
Street North in London.
as innovative
We are interested in knowing how you are addressing Smart Growth in your municipality, as well
ideas you may have for encouraging Smart Growth in your community.
An agenda for the meeting is attached. Please let Lorilee Riddell from the Municipal Services Office -
Southwestern (519) 873-4020 or 1-800-265-4736 know if you will be able to participate or speak to William Pol
if your have any questions. In the meantime, I encourage you to visit our Smart Growth Web site
www.smartgrowth.gov.on.ca for a copy of our consultation gnide Get Engaged...in Ontario Smart Growth.
.12
47
322(06/95)
2
I look forward to hearing your views on how we can encourage Smart Growth in your region.
48
Sincerely: _ /
~~
Assistant Deputy Minister
ONTARIO SMART GROWTH
MUNICIPAL CONSULTATION
Lambton and London
Middlesex,
Elgin,
Middlesex Room, County of Middlesex Building
399 Ridout Street North, London
Thursday June 28, 1 - 4 p.m.
(See map on the back of this page)
AGENDA
Introduction
00 p.m.
I
Overview Presentation - Smart Growth Issues
Smart Growth Municipal Issues
Open Discussion with the municipal representatives
o p.m.
30 p.m.
I
I
I
Working Break
Round table discussion to prioritize proposed Smart Growth goals and actions
2:00 p.m.
Overview Presentation - Smart Growth Ideas
Smart Growth Innovations and Solutions
Round table discussion
2:20 p.m.
2:40 p.m.
Sharing of local Smart Growth ideas
Open discussion with municipal representatives
3:40 p.m.
Closing remarks and wrap up
Closing
3:55 p.m.
4:00 p.m.
To confirm your attendance or if you have any questions please call 1-800-265-4736 toll free or
(519) 873-4020 and speak to Lorilee Riddell, or William Pol, Ministry of Municipal Affairs and
Housing, Municipal Services Office - Southwestern. (Please note: Depending on the availability
of space, and to ensure all municipalities are represented, attendance may be restricted to 2
persons per municipality.)
49
Relurn 10
C¡lyMap
MAP
LEGEND
¡¡;;¡¡)p k
li;J!J ar s
~S7¡:.
1, I?N Ro
~ ~
.J~._._.\-._....
-.-'-'- \;1"~ ~
~5"i ~
ø--ro. {CI
.' 'i,. 11
~ \:I
. -..
s.i~
($i-..p'tY
..
~a.:.~1III
."
"
,....r~;.~·.,.·".·-
....~........
"'¡'.f:Y' _"""'0:'.:......
i.j'WC,.,.""""".·
........ .....
."
;,.
~ '\
~
~
'$.
o ,~
~ ....-
\:I ,,~ ...-."
tP~·~ --. ,-..,..-.-.-
...-....-...-.-. ~..
-0.15 þ}lj;.
rj)j;.P'
\.
o
L!ì.
1
H41\i'1l)"ON RO
~
~
\
~
-..
~
~\
. .
"co \:
. '\,
",<¡.
,.,
@2001 Œy of London ON
L
o
kilometres
1
2
3
4
5
Map Notes: Location Map - Middlesex County Building - Middlesex Room 399 Ridout 5t N Lone
Now use File / Print to print this map
For best results, print in Landscape mode
Mailing Address:
Box 399, Station Main, st. Thomas, ON N5P 3V3
MuniciRal World Inc.
com
Union. ON NOL 2LO
Phone: 519-633-0031 Fax: 519-633-1001
Email: mwadmin@municipalworld
Website http://www.municipalworld.com
Location/Courier:
42860 Sparta Line,
Municipal WorldThl- the oldest, continuously
Published monthly municipal magazine in the world,
Serving Canadian municipalities since 1891.
Publishers of Canadian Municipal Code
,TMRegistered Trade Mark in Canada of Municipal
World Inc.
! 2001
JUN
May 29, 2001
Dear Mark McDonald:
.~;, F~':), ,j,!," >:'" , '-,"_' " '_" __w J,I-,ß~J\J
For over a century, Municipal World has always been there recording aud reporting kéý,tñ.µnigÎp<\1.i'('eq
matters. We've always believed that for municipal officials - both elected aud appointed - to be' ""','
effective in their roles, they need to be aware and informed on the broad range of issues that impact
local government organizations: management issues, legislative issues, technology issues and
governance issues to name just a few. We believe the best tool is knowledge - and the Municipal
World Charter Program is a vehicle to help your municipality deliver that valuable commodity in a
team
cost-effective way.
The Past
In the not too distant past, most municipal organizations were comprised of a small but dedicated
of elected and appointed officials. These people worked together - and cooperatively with other
organizations - to deliver a wide range of services to their communities. The smallest of those
municipalities typically had need of about 10-12 copies of the magazine to distribute to council
members and key staff.
The Present
Today, as we all
world.
A new municipal model has emerged. Your municipality is larger, with an expanded service area,
increased specialization and departmentalization, and increased roles and responsibilities. Public
expectations have far from diminished - the community continues to expect the same or a greater level
of service as in the past, and delivery of those services still requires people - good, accountable,
informed people, who are aware of the enormous responsibility public service carries with it. While
rapid advances in technology continue to require your municipality to upgrade systems and software,
and invest in the education and training of employees, you must now also compete with big business to
s a different
it'
know,
keep these employees.
Everyone concerned about local government needs to have the fnll pictnre - insight to the changes that
are shaping our communities, legislation and case law that affect the day to day business of municipal
organizations, innovative, new ways of doing business and getting the job done. Chances are, there are
more than 10 or 12 people in the municipality who need to be infonned!
World Charter
to be "in the know'
and has developed the Municipal
who needs
1
5
The Charter Program
Municipal World has recognized this new reality,
Program to ensure that your mnnicipality can deliver copies to everyone
- at a special Charter Member price.
Charter Members receive 2 for 1
Your municipality will be eligible to receive 50 subscriptions to the magazine for the price of 25. That
means 50 people in your organization will receive the magazine each month, at a cost equivalent to 25
subscriptions at the regular annual price of $55 each. For example, they can go to the head of council,
and each council member; every director and department head; key support staff; your local libraries;
the Chamber of Commerce; members of business improvement area boards; the economic development
office; members of boards and committees; ratepayer associations.
and your
And, while you are billed annually, you can change your recipient list at any time,
PRICE IS GUARANTEED for five years!
knowledge really is the best tool- and the Charter Program
For people involved in local government,
delivers!
Added Benefits
As a Charter Member, your municipality will also enjoy other benefits, including:
· a 10% discount on the purchase of selected Municipal World publications;
· a 5% discount on the purchase of most Municipal World stationery and supplies listed in the
enclosed catalogue;
for the municipal library, a complimentary copy of the Municipal World annual bound volume-
containing 12 issues of Municipal World, including the valuable annual index - as well as
discounts on the purchase of additional bound volumes for other local libraries;
37.5% discount on classified advertising in Municipal World magazine;
place three ads on our Internet site and the fourth is free;
conference and training discounts with our partner organizations.
·
·
·
·
Consider this - for less than ten cents a day, per subscription, your municipality can keep the whole
team well informed. From the latest developments in water and wastewater management, new
technology, amalgamations, parks and recreation, court cases etc. No one will feel left out of the loop-
everyone gets to see the big picture. And, your municipality enjoys additional, valuable benefits
reserved only to our Charter members
to
For today's municipality, the Municipal World Charter Program makes sense. The enclosed deluxe
photo mousepad is our special gift to you, as we launch this new program. Thank you for continuing
make Municipal World Canada's magazine of choice in the municipal sector.
Call our circulation department now at 1-888-368-6125 for further information on how you can register
your municipality as a Charter Member. If you have already renewed, we thank you! We will be
pleased to help you convert your current subscriptions to our Charter program at the preferred rate
when you call.
I look forward to hearing from you soon
y;~. W~
Theresa Wates
Circulation Control
~
qp
52
ONTARI~ST
MUNICIPAl CONflRENCE
... .. f
..l1li Association 0
IIIIIlI Municipal-Manager.
. .. Clerks and Treasure,
III of Ontario
2001
CORRESPONDENCE - June 26th
end a
Honourable Brad Clark, Ministry of Transportation, acknowledging Council's resolution
concerning allocation of fuel tax revenues to municipalities. (ATTACHED)
nformation - (Consent A
Items for
1
AMO Member Communication - For Your Information: 1) "AMO Submits Report on
Financing of Waterworks to Walkerton Inquiry"; 2) "AMO and Ontario 911 Advisory
Board Make Submission to CRTC on BNAS". (ATTACHED)
2.
Federation of Canadian Municipalities, with information regarding FCM's National
Symposium: Communities in an Urban Century. (ATTACHED)
3
Terry Carroll, United Way of Elgin-St.Thomas, with a newsletter follow-up to the E5
"Where do you want Elgin to be in 5 years?" workshop held in May. (ATTACHED)
4
Honourable David Turnbull, Ministry of the Solicitor General, responding to the
County's support for the City of Weiland and the Town of Oakville's resolutions
regarding the funding proposal from the Ontario Association of Fire Chiefs.
(ATTACHED)
5.
Phyllis Ketchabaw, Clerk, Town of Aylmer, endorsing the resolution of the County of
Brant concerning cross-border ambulance services. (ATTACHED)
6.
Ontario News Release, Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs,
regarding "New Ontario Legislation will Protect Water and Set Clear Standards for
Farms". (ATTACHED)
7
training modules
AMO - Municom Network, with information regarding on-line
available over the Internet. (ATTACHED)
8
Judi Hartman, Deputy Registrar General, Ministry of Consumer and Business
Services, with information concerning the "Amendment to Regulation 1094 under the
VITAL STATISTICS ACT by the Ministry of Consumer and Business Services
(MCBS)" (ATTACHED)
9
Honourable James M. Flaherty, Minister of Finance, acknowledging Council's support
for the funding of fire services in the Province of Ontario.
10
Steve Peters, M. P. P., Elgin-Middlesex-London, with copies of correspondence to: 1)
the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing regarding funding for municipalities to
help with the cost of downloading of services; 2) the Attorney General and Minister of
Native Affairs regarding exemption for municipalities re: Provincial Court filing and
enforcement fees; 3) the Minister of the Environment regarding sharing of costs for
residential recycling programs by industry and municipalities.
11
53
2
12 St. Thomas REACT Inc. Newsletter (ATTACHED)
13 Honourable Chris Hodgson, Ministry Municipal Affairs and Housing, with an update on
recent changes to the Municipal Performance Measurement Program. (ATTACHED)
14. Honourable James M. Flaherty, Ministry of Finance, announcing the Ministry of
Finance's Community Reinvestment Fund consultations to begin shortly.
(ATTACHED)
15. Lucas Thacker, University of Guelph, with a copy of the Nutrient Management Bylaws
in the Province of Ontario report. (ATTACHED)
Additional Correspondence from the Township of Malahide introduced to Council by Deputy
Warden Wilson.
R. Millard, CAOIClerk, Township of Malahide, proposed entrances in Hamlet of
Copenhagen.
~tÆ
..''''''.
Ontario
Mlnistère des
Transports
Bureau du ministre
Édifice Ferguson, 3e étage
77, rue Wellesley ouest
Toronto (Ontario)
M7A 1Z8
(416) 327-9200
www.mto.gov.on.ca
Ministry of
Transportation
Office of the Minister
Ferguson Block, 3rd Floor
77 Wellesley 51. West
Toronto, Ontario
M7A 1Z8
(416) 327-9200
www.mto.gov.on.ca
2001
JUN 8
2001
Mrs. Sandra J. Heffren
Deputy Clerk
County of Elgin
450 Sunset Drive
St. Thomas, Ontario
N5R 5Vl
May 31
Heffren:
Thank you for your letter forwarding me a copy of the County of Elgin's resolution regarding
allocating a portion of fuel tax revenues to municipalities for dedicated road infrastructure
maintenance, which was also forwarded to me by Steve Peters, MPP, Elgin-Middlesex-London.
Dear Mrs.
As you may know, any proposal to change existing practices involving the use of provincial
revenues from transportation-related sources would need to be considered by my colleague, the
Honourable Jim Flaherty, Minister of Finance. I am therefore forwarding a copy of your letter to
him for his consideration.
Thank you again for bringing the County's resolution to my attention.
Yours sincerely,
Brad Clark
Minister
55
Hon. Jim Flaherty, Minister of Finance
Steve Peters, MPP, Elgin-Middlesex-London
cc
Page BB2
p, 01/01
AssociatÌl:)n of
Municipalities
of Ontario
CLERH-Elgin Co
-
416 971 6191
£.tt1j
393
1 519 £,33 7£,£,1
FAX NO.
ASSOCIATION OF?-}
AMO
rUE 05:24 PM
EST
B£,/B5/B1 22:18:29
JUN-05-0
For Your
6nformati
Unlvurtllty AVef'tU~1 .sul!ß 1701
Toronto, ON M5G 1f::e
(410) 971-9699' fa" (416) 97'1·6101
~"'BoII: ðMO@Bn\O,munloom.com
Tel:
on
Members of Council
To the attention of the Clerk and Council.
Please ensure that copies of this are distributed to all
011024
ry
AMO Submits Report on Financing of Waterworks to Walkerton ,"qui
FYI
June 5, 2001
Immediate Attl.!ntion
For
Municipa
AMO and its partners, MEA and OGRA, have prepared a study on the Financing of
Waterworks for the Walkerton Commission
SsIJ6
Facts
This week, the Association of Municipalities of Ontario, in association with the Municipal Engini~ers
Association (MEA) Clnd the Ontario Good Roads Association (OGRA) submitted a report to the
Walkerton Inquiry Commission, entitled, "Financing of Municipal Waterworks: Analysis and Case
Studies':
The report was prepared as AMO, OGRA and MEA's contribution to Part II of the Walkerton Inquiry.
AMO received funding from the Commission to prepare the report, The AMO/MEAlOGRA paper, along
with submissions from other parties, will be discussed at the Walkerton Inquiry Expert Meetinl~ on
Municipal Finance, on June 20ih in Toronto, and again at the Inquiry's Public Meeting on the same
subject, later in the summer,
The report includes four case studies of the capacity and sustainability of municipal financing of their
water works. The case studies were prepared by Pricewaterhouse Coopers.
A major conclusion of the report is that a move to full cost recovery for municipal water services would
provide municipalities with increased revenue to invest in water infrastructure and services. However,
it would also result in a significant increase in water rates. In some cases, for water systems with low
customer density, this increase could prove prohibitively expensive. Any move towards full cost recovery
must therefore begin with a sound analysis of the impact on water rates in all parts of Ontario, and the
capacity for rate payers to pay these increased costs, Even with full-cost recovery, other financing
sources and tools, including senior government assistance, may be needed to help municipalities
finance their waterworks.
The report will be posted on theAMO website at~.mu/1icom.coro.. and on the Walkerton Commission
web site at ~,~.ªJk~.tI.9D'n.ç.uj.tY&.9_m
senior policy advisor, at 416-971-9856. ext 329
For more information, please contact Nicola Crawha
or at I!£[awb-ª!I(ã)aJJ}Q,.!I)1!.t1icQ!I1J<om
This in/ormation is DVa/ïable througlJ AMO's subscription based MUNICOM network at !t!!Yf.'!!Jn/.lnic.o'J1..c.om.
56
(416) 971-9856
For transmission problems. contact:
Page 882
CLERK-Elgin Co
1 519 G33 7GGl
ASSOCIATion OF?-)
EST
8G/18/81 22:8G:42
01/01
Association of
Municipalities
of Ontario
p,
6191
~~.
416 97
FAX NO.
393 UniversitY AI/enu~r Suite 1701
Toronto, ON M5G 1E!3
Tel: (416) 971·9656' ",,' (416) 971-6191
emalt: amo@Bmo.munlcom,oom
For
6nformation
AMO
PM
5
MON 04
JUN-18-0
Members of Council
To the attention of the Clerk and Council.
Please ensure that copies of this are distributed to all
June 18, 2001
FYI" 01/025
ADVISORY BOARD MAKE SUBMISSION TO CRTC ON BNAS
mmediate Attention
For
Canada Application to Destandardize and Withdraw the Bell Neutral Answer
AMO AND ONTARIO 9-1-1
Bel
Issue: Tariff Notice No.65-(8-
Service (BNAS).
and to further withdraw the
Background:
Beil Canada's application is to destandardize BNAS effective July 2,2001
service in Its entirety no later than February 2003.
Point for al
Primary Answer
Numerous Ontario municipalities have come to reply on BNAS as their
9-1-1- calls
.
Thejoint submission outlines how Bell's application understates the Impact to these municipalities and
that the lime frames outlined for the withdrawal of BNAS are restrictive and impractical.
The submission among other matters sets out:-
the practical concerns with renewing agreements on a monthly basis effective July 2 (Bell's
proposal) and the lead time to do a municipal tendering process;
the work Involved In re-configuring a municipality's 9-1-1- network to route to an alternative
provider;
lhe added time and municipal resources and;
the unknown capacity of alternative providers to assume the BNAS role for the large number of
municipalities affected in the next 20 months.
'!!:;NW.111 unic_Qffi.C_Om
A complete copy of the submission is available on
.
www.municom.com.
Director of Policy and Government Relations at (416) 971-9856 ex\. 316.
tl¡rough AMO's subscription based MUNfCOM network at
1'l1i5 information is availnble
Info: Contact Pat Vanini
(416) 971-9856
further
Transmission problems:
For
57
.---...-
.y.--......
...--,....--.
(FCM)
Attend FCM's National Symposium
Communities in an Urban Century
Toronto, Ontario, October 4-5, 2001
15, 2001
Complete Below and Fax Back to (613) 241-2126 Before June
to Receive Your Program and Registration Package.
Federation of Canadian Municipalities
Elected and Appointed Municipal
Municipal governments in Canada have far fewer legislative and financial options
available than European and U.S. counterparts. This inadequacy must be addressed. In
response to the Prime Minister's Caucus Task Force on Urban Issues, FCM is organizing
a national symposium to rethink municipal powers and to develop a toolkit of mechanisms
needed to ensure the competitiveness of Canadian communities.
Invited to Attend
Officials are
Hear from international and Canadian experts in municipal finance, governance, urban
planning, sustainability, economic development, and global competitiveness. Other
participants include senior federal and provincial representatives as well as members of
the private sector. Send a team of political and managerial representatives. A team
approach will allow for comprehensive discussion of these complex issues.
Symposium Highlights
Creating a New Legislative Framework for Municipal Governments. in Canada
Funding Mechanisms for Transit, Municipal Infrastructure and Affordable Housing
Overcoming Barriers to Implementing e-Government and e-Commerce
Developing New Partnerships with the Private Sector
New Revenue Sources for Municipal Governments
Enhanced UrbanlRural Cooperation
Innovative European and U.S. Funding Models
2001
Complete Below and Fax Back to (613) 241-2126 Before June 15,
to Receive Your Program and Registration Package.
Title
Name
Municipality
"
Address
Postal Code
Provice/T erritory.
Fax
Telephone
E-mai
United Way
Thomas
of Elgin-St.
June 8, 2001
3 200\
I
JUN
Mr. Mark G. McDonald
Chief Admin. Officer
County of Elgin
450 Sunset Drive
St. Thomas, Ontario
N5R 5VI
Day Workshop - May
Dear Mr. McDonald;
E5 "Where do you want Elgin to be in 5 years?" Full
11 th at the Southwold Keystone Complex in Shedden
Re:
We would like you to have a copy of our Newsletter/Report briefly outlining what a large
and diverse group of people accomplished in one day, and what it means for the future of
Elgin County ... for the next five years.
This event saw people gather together for a sharing of ideas, visions and concerns; to
pinpoint what it takes to build a strong and healthy community. Many were astounded to
realize the abundance of resources already available in their conununities, and at the
same time, were happy to learn they were not alone in what they believed was missing.
You will see an edited version of the many assets (resources) identified in each
community, and a list of needs or gaps, which, following the mapping exercise and
voting process, evolved as projects to be tackled.
We hope you will take part in the development of these projects as they begin to take
shape. If you see a role for yourself or your organization in helping a project in any way
become reality, your suggestions, conunents or ideas would be very welcome. So please,
just call me (the undersigned) at 631-3171.
YOl t y,
I
/ ~ /
Terry CalrØ'll, C.E.O
United W/.y
E5 Ordinator - Dorrell
Garraway
FAX 519-631-9253
59
ThomasONN5P IB8, 519-631-3171
Registered Charity No. 118897107 RROOOI
.
St.
Enclosure
400 Talbot St.
-9lep0Jd
In
May 11th - Southwold Keystone Complex - Workshop . . . 121 people comprising business
people, labour, municipal representatives and community leaders, as well as caring and interested
individuals came together to "brain storm". This sharing of ideas, visions, hopes and dreams was
anticipation of arriving at a common goal or goals for all communities in all of Elgin County.
Following a tasty breakfast, the day kicked off with a dynamic speech by keynote speaker, Mike
Bruce, Regional Manager for Community Capacity Building, H.R.D.C., Newfoundland and Labrador.
The enthusiastic participants then broke into 4 groups: East Elgin, West, Central and St. Thomas
to list assets (resources) and needs (gaps) in their communities. Using an asset-mapping process the
groups arrived at projects that they thought should be tackled. At the end of the day, many signed up as
volunteers to work on one or more of the projects which emerged.
During lunch there was a business panel composed of Doug Malloch, AI Riddell and Bob
Ashcroft. Each one spoke of the participation by industrylbig business in building better communities,
and indicated a willingness to expand that role beyond the financial.
Here is an edited version of the many and varied assets you identified which make you proud of
the places where you live, work and play. . . and what you decided is missing, identified as needs, which
evolved as projects.
Eaðt:
a,,,eið (Uðo.wtœ.ð)
Diverse Culture - Mennonite/Anùsh - Gathering Place;
Old Petes & Aylmer farm markets
Police College -large employer/outreach facilities
Grocery/Pharmacy & transportation for elderly/newcomers
Schools -leaders with the community; promote activities, sports
Churches - many; for all people
- Youth programs and community programs
TV lMedialNewspapers
- Aylmer Express, AM Telecom -low German radio station
Movement for Arena Development
M.C.C. - Meunonite Resource Centre
Old Town Hall
Service Groups (men's and women's) - too many to name
Seniors Homes/Long Term Care - Victoria Place, Kensington, Sunnyside, Myrtle, to name only a few
60
2
[f~ tIiat Enwtged-
East Elgin Health Centre; 2. Diversified Manufacturing & Industry
Weðt:
(L,ðdð (1te60UJtœð) -
Good access to Technology - Libraries, Information Elgin
Good trades people
Emergency Services
By-laws and law enforcement
Good mix of Ages & CulturesÆducation/Churches
W.E.D.S./Choral SocietyIYellow Cottage
ArenalRecreation Centre
Lots of Parks - Sports - Rec. - walking trails
Good sewage system; roads
Employment Workshops -learning opportunities all ages
Large & Small Businesses/jobs/entrepreneurs
Links to urban centres - 401, Hwy. 2, 3
Farm Markets/OrchardsIFall Fairs/ Swain's Greenhouse Seniors Groups & Long Term Care facilities -
Bobier Villa, Caledonia Gardens, Beattie Haven, to name only a few
Affordable Housing e.g. WECHC Supportive Housing Hospital/Funeral Homes/Cemeteries
Service Groups (men's & women's) in all regions - too numerous to name
Chamber of CommerceÆCDC
Volunteer Youth in the Millennium
V.O.N./Red Cross/Alzheimers/Walk-in Clinics, etc.
Aylmer Community Services/YWCAÆmployment Elgin/HRDC - provincial! federal/local
Police & Fire protection/emergency services
Donut "Capital" - Spicers
Amish Co-Op, manufacturing, newspapers, entrepreneurial Cross-Canada Trails
Good Agriculture, Scenery, Climate, Culture, Environment
BeachesIPortlcommercial fishing
Local businesses/skilled work force/low farm debt
New Main Street Program
water/sewers
.N eedð (gajJð) -
Community Centre, Youth Centre, more trees, clean water, better leadership,
diversified manufacturing & industry, health centre & accessibility
1
.Needð ( gajJð) -
Affordable family housing; Access to municipal water/better water security/affordable; wildlife
preservation; enhanced walking trails; indoor pool; communication network; centralized youth facility
with a variety of programs & services, trained & tolerant personnel; Economic Development Board for all
6
3
of West Elgin to plan strategies, attract large & small; environmentally ftiendly industry; encourage new
business; partnering by local business people to sell "ourselves"
:J~ tfwt Enwtgd-
I. Centralized Youth Facility - variety of programs & services - trained & tolerant personnel; 2.
Economic Development Board for all of West Elgin - to plan strategies to encourage new business;
partnership - i. e. local people - no consultants - sell "ourselves".
special
CALIPSO Days &
Child & Family Counselling
Campgrounds
Golf Courses,
Monteith Medical
~ðetð (~cuvtœð)
Lake Erie, Waterways, Kettle & Talbot Creeks
Port/Harbour - Commercial fishing
Beaches, hiking trails, conservation areas
Moore Water Gardens
Beautiful communities and public spaces
Tourist Accommodations - B & Bs, Iuns, Motels,
Emergency Services - 911
Favourable climate
Churches, Schools, Historical & Horticultural Societies
Artists
Good jobs/employment
Entertainment opportunities - Theatre, Winery, Restaurants,
events, Rosy Rhubarb, The H.U.B.
Arenas, skateboard parks
Youth Clubs - 4H, Cubs, Scouts, Girl Guides
Good Volunteer base
Medical Care facilities - C.A. Bell (Port Stanley),
Seniors and Long Term Care Facilities
Meals-On- Wheels & Palliative Care, Red Cross
Library services
Good roads, snow removal
Taxi services
Women's Shelter; Family & Children's Services;
.N eedð (gapð) -
Upgrades to water & sewers; Harbour development; Transportation - Port Stanley/St. Thomas/London
link; more social housing; pedestrian & biking lanes; universally paved roads; leadership training for
youth/young adults for planning & implementing projects; rural economic development
:J~ tfwt Enwtgd-
I. LeadershipTraining for Youth and Young Adults for Planning & Implementing Projects (expand
on Youth Start philosophy) in conjunction with intergenerational oversight (umbrella); 2. Rural
Economic Initiative: - bring stake holders together - could include - dedicated staff, i. e. not an add-on to
some else's job - develop partnerships in rural economic development.
62
4
St. [jfwtna6:
~ðdð (fteðCJWtœ¡)) -
25% More Life - Growth Potential
Downtown 2 Hours. "Free" Parking
Skilled Workforce
Iron Horse Festival
Art Galleries/Museums
Playhouse/Theatre
Academy of Music
Trans Canada Trail
Music in the Park (pinafore Park)
Chamber of Commerce
Service Groups
Recycling Program
At-the-curb Compo sting
Industrial Investment in Community
HospitallWalk-in Clinic/Doctors/Altemative Health Care
Seniors Centre & Long Term Care Facilities
St. Anne's Centre - recreational, charitable and entertainment facility
Affordable Housing
Bus Service (needs improvement)/Para Transit/Taxis
Airport
911 Emergency Service
YMCA
Doug Tarry Sports Complex
Public Access to Internet - Information Elgin - Library
YWCA
Elementary/Secondary Schools
Fanshawe College, Oxford Learuing Centre
Adult Leaming Centre
Speech & Language Services (ECCAC)
Churches - diverse
Arenas, Parks, Soccer Fields, Ball Diamonds, Teunis, Curling, Swimming
Summer Camps
99.9% houses on sanitary sewers
100% potable water
Water Purification/Sewer Treatment Plants
Crime StopperslNeighbourhood WatchIBlock Parents
Alzheimer Registration
Women's Shelter/2nd Stage Housing
Food Bank
L.EAP. - Learning, Eaming & Parenting - teen moms)
Junior Achievement
Sexual Health ClinicSc·
Volunteer Youth in the Millennium
Media - Rogers Cable TV/St. Thomas Times-Journal
Wildlife Appreciation, Animal Aide, Veterinarians
63
5
Pinafore Sanctuary & Pond
Naturalized Ravines
cm - Communities in Bloom
Downtown MuralsIParkettes
K.C.C.A. Tree Planting, Boulevard Tree Planting, Community Gardens - Red Cross & United Way
.Ned, (gapð)-
Policy re: non-use of pesticides; walking, cycling pathltrail- master plan; provide opportunities for re-
cycling on public property (parks); improved public transportation; expand sewage capacity; community
focus centre - Town Square/central gathering place; support for cultural centre, etc.; improve N/S links
between Talbot/William Streets; committee to the Main Street program; improve parking; more .
designated green spaces; Mentor Program for youth & seniors together; large community centre/variety of
partners; way to bring urban & rural communities together; technology counectivity across Elgin; more
accessibility to social services
3
[f~ tfwt Ûtw«pd-
1. Youth Strategy - Activities & Centre - skills/mentors; 2. Improved Public Transportation;
Main Street Program; 4. Large Commnnity Centre; 5. Social Planning Council.
64
~
Ontario
CM01-02000 & 02269
JUN 14 2001
Ministère du
Solliciteur général
Ministry of the
Solicitor General
the
Bureau du
mlnistre
25, rue Grosvenor
11' étage
Toronto. ON M7A 1Y6
Téléphone: (416) 326-5075
Télécopieur: (416) 326-5085
Office of
Minister
25 Grosvenor 8t
11th Floor
Toronto, ON M7A 1Y6
Telephone: (416) 326-5075
Facsimile: (416) 326-5085
JUN 0 5 2001
Mrs, Sandra J. Heffren
Deputy Clerk
County of Elgin
450 Sunset Drive
St. Thomas ON N5R 5V1
Heffren
Thank you for your letter advising me of the resolution passed by council in support
the motion by the City of Weiland and the Town of Oakville regarding the funding
proposal from the Ontario Association of Fire Chiefs (OAFC). I welcome the opportunity
to respond.
of
Mrs
Dear
The introduction of the Fire Protection and Prevention Act, 1997 (FPPA) established a
new framework for the provision of fire protection in Ontario. The FPPA shifted the
focus of the Ontario fire service to place a priority on fire prevention and public
education. While fire suppression will continue to be the most visible part of a fire
department's responsibilities, mandatory fire prevention and public education will send a
clear message that prevention and public education are the most important factors for
fire safety in Ontario today.
This new framework for the provision of fire protection in Ontario also included specific
roles for the province and municipalities. Within this framework, municipalities are
responsible for funding and delivering services and the province is responsible for
providing advice, guidance and support to municipalities.
The government, through the Office of the Fire Marshal and the Fire Marshal's Public
Fire Safety Council, already provides significant support to the fire service. The Office
of the Fire Marshal provides leadership, advice and assistance, education and expertise
through a variety of programs and activities, including the following: developing public
education programs; developing fire prevention programs and materials for use by the
fire service; participating in research activities; conducting fire investigations; operating
the Ontario Fire College; and delivering training programs in the field.
./2
I
I
I
65
Heffren
Mrs. Sandra J
Page two
c
In the recent Throne Speech, bur government announced that it was focusing on three
priorities: growth, fiscal responsibility and accountability. Responsible, and often difficult
choices are required to keep the economy growing. Governments at all levels
experience challenges in setting spending priorities from among competing demands.
I recently met with the representatives from the OAFC to discuss their funding proposal
and advised them that due to the current fiscal environment, the government is not in a
position to pursue the proposal. I realize that OAFC received this news with
disappointment.
Despite the challenges and difficult choices we all currently face, I continue to
encourage new ideas and approaches that enhance public safety.
advising me of
Thankyouagain for
trust that this information is of assistance to you
council's views.
Sincerely,
1r~µ1
David Turnbul
Solicitor General
Mr. Steve Peters, MPP
ElgincMiddlesex-London
C
Mr. Sean Conway, MPP
Renfrew-Nipissing-Pembroke
66
,
010 P.Ol
No
10
16
13'01
JUN
ID:519-765-1446
TOWN 01
AYLMER
OF AYLMER
Cw'k
)7
Kctd1rl/1uw
'h¡¡lIi,'
4ó 'hll".lt Strl!l't, W~"':F>l~ ^yIHlt;I,J'1 Ontan(") NS
omœ: (519) 773-3164I',x: (519) 765-1446
Adminif;tmltJr .
GrrwC'F:
W",,,}d
Admillistraliô
TOWN
13,2001
June
Honourable Tony Clement,
Minister of Health & Long Term Care,
80 Grosvenor Street,
He-Rburn Block,
10 H Floor,
TORONTO,ON M7A 2C4
Town Council on
resolution passed by Ayimer
Honourable Sir:
Please be advised of the following
May 14th, 2001
"That Aylmer Town Council endorse the resolution of the County of Brant
re: cross·border ambulance services, and that a copy of this resolution be
forwarded to the Ministry of Health, AMO, M.P.P. Steve Peters, County of
Brant, and County of Elgin."
serious consideration
resolution your
Yours truly,
I~~ ~~~
CI/rk
Phyllis Ketchabaw
Please give Aylmer's
Mr. Steve Peters, MPP Elgin/Middlesex/London
AMO
County of Brant
County of Elgin
67
c.c.
416-863-2101
news release
.. ,
communique
Please Call
The County of Elgin
In Case of Transmission Difficulties
Please Deliver To
® Ontario
Ministry 01 Agriculture, Ministère de l'Agriculture,
Food and Rural Affairs de 'Alimentation et des AI/aires
rurales
13, 2001
NEW ONTARIO LEGISLATION WILL PROTECT WATER AND
SET CLEAR STANDARDS FOR FARMS
June
TORONTO - The Ontario government is introducing a new law that would set and
enforce clear, consistent standards for nutrient management on farms and protect the
environment, announced Minister of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs Brian Coburn
today.
"We're proposing preventive measures to address the effects of agricultural operations
and municipal activities and the safe and effective management of land-applied
materials containing nutrients," Coburn said. "Clear requirements based on the work
developed with farmers - and the best practices many farmers already use - will
ensure sustainable growth, safeguard the environment and make rural Ontario
attractive to economic inves1ment."
"This proposed legislation will protect the environment with strong, new preventive
measures. Highly trained Provincial Officers with a knowledge of agriculture will ensure
focused and effective environmental enforcement of strong new standards," said
Environment Minister Elizabeth Witmer. "We thank all the individuals, organizations
and other stakeholders, who participated in the consultation process and encourage
them to comment further on this proposed legislation."
Under the proposed Nutrient Management Act 2001, clear new standards will be
developed for all land-applied materials containing nutrients relating to agriculture·
including livestock manure, commercial fertilizer, municipal biosolids, septage and
industrial pulp and paper sludge. Stakeholders and the Ministry of the Environment
(MOE) will partner with the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs over the
summer to develop the provincial standards.
The proposed legislation would provide authority for regulations governing several
areas including:
mandatory Nutrient Management Plans (NMPs).
certification of commercial land applicators of materials containing nutrients
distance requirements for manure and biosolids application near wells and
waterways.
banning the land application of untreated septage over a five-year period.
establishing and delivering associated education, training and certification programs
..
..
..
..
..
./2
68
materials containing
2
establishing a database system to record land applications of
nutrients, with an initial focus on biosolids and manure.
establishing minimum quality and application standards for land applied nutrients.
·
·
The bill would provide for a framework to phase in standards over time, depending on
the size of operations and the kinds of practices that are carried out.
the following categories would be defined
Large livestock operations (e.g. 450
Smaller livestock operations
Other agricultural operations (e.g. greenhouses, mushroom
livestock units)
a minimum
At
·
·
·
facilities. cash crops)
The proposed legislation responds to consultations conducted with municipal, farm and
environmental stakeholders; is consistent with the Environmental Commissioner's
report; responds to the "Managing the Environment Report"; and fits with the
government's Smart Growth vision.
(version frança.ise disponible)
30
Barry Wilson
MOE Minister's Office
(416) 314-6739
Contact
Jo-Anne Farq~har
OMAFRA Mini ter's Office
(416) 326-643
Mark Rabbior
MOE Communications Branch
(416) 314-6084
\.
Invite Ontario home
Invitez "Ontario à votre table
Randy Jackiw
OMAFRA Rescpurcas Management
(519) 826-35T~
\.
69
® Ontario
background
che d'information
fi
Ministry 01 Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs
Minístère de l'Agriculture. de l'Alimentation et
des Affaires rurales
Act 2001
Proposed Nutrient Management
Context
As part of the Ontario government's Operation Clean Water strategy, the proposed
Nutrient Management Act 2001 would provide for province-wide standards to address
the effects of agricultural practices on the environment, especially as they relate to
land-applied materials containing nutrients.
The proposed legislation would provide authority to establish province-wide standards
for the management of materials containing nutrients and set out requirements and
responsibilities for farmers, municipalities and others in the business of managing
nutrients.
The sources of these nutrients include manure and other materials generated through
agricultural operations, commercial fertilizers, biosolids generated by municipal sewage
treatment, septage and pulp and paper sludge. Currently, the land application of these
materials is governed by an array of legislative and regulatory provisions, guidelines,
voluntary best management practices and a patchwork of municipal by-laws.
There remains, however, a need for a comprehensive, clear, provincewide approach
that protects the water, environment and well-being of communities in rural Ontario,
while ensuring farmers can invest in and operate their farms with confidence. This need
was confirmed by farmers themselves, municipalities, environmental groups and others
during consultations held by the Task Force on Intensive Agricultural Operations in
Rural Ontario during early 2000.
The proposed legislation responds to the results of these consultations, and its
development was guided by the "Managing the Environment" report released in January
2001, which strongly recommended an integrated approach to environmental
management. The bill also addresses the issues and risks identified in the
Environmental Commissioner's special report of July 2000, "The Protection of Ontario's
Groundwater and Intensive Farming." It also builds on the government's Smart Growth
Strategy which calls for well-planned and environmentally sensitive development.
70
2
would the legislation do?
The proposed Nutrient Management Act was developed by the Ministry of Agriculture,
Food and Rural Affairs (OMAFRA) and the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) using the
recommendations of many private and public sector sources. It would:
What
land-applied materials and
set out a comprehensive and integrated approach to al
the safe disposal of dead stock;
ensure that all land-applied materials will be managed in a sustainable, beneficial
manner which results in environmental protection;
provide for clear, province-wide standards so that farmers can invest with
confidence in their businesses; and
increase public confidence in a sustainable future for agricultural and
development.
rural
·
·
·
·
What's In the legislation?
The bill is enabling legislation that would support the implementation of a
comprehensive regulatory framework regarding nutrient management and other related
farm practices in Ontario.
The key to this proposed framework would be the Nutrient Management Plan (NMP
which is a science-based tool identifying how manure, commercial fertilizers, other
nutrients and existing soil fertility are effectively managed in an environmentally
responsible manner. Different types of operations would have different requirements
and eventually all land-applied materials containing nutrients would be managed
according to a NMP.
)
Many guidelines and other reference documents have already been developed which
could provide a good basis for these standards. Examples include the Ontario Farm
Environmental Coalition's Nutrient Management Strategy, Environmental Farm Plan
and many Best Management Practices.
The legislation would also provide enforcement authority. In line with other
environmental legislation, provincial government officers who are knowledgeable in
agriculture and the environment would have the authority to inspect and issue
compliance and preventive orders. The legislation would also establish the right
appeal to the Environmental Review Tribunal.
to
Municipal responsibilities would be clarified under the bill. New standards would
replace the patchwork of municipal bylaws regarding nutrient management.
Municipalities would have this as support for their continued responsibility for land use
planning and building code approvals. It would also allow for the creation of local
advisory committees to promote awareness of the new rules, and mediate local nutrient
management noncompliance related issues.
'I
Invite Ontario home
Invilez l'Ontarlo à votre lable
\,~
1
7
3
Administratively, the legislation would provide for alternate delivery of the review and
approval of NMPs and for the establishment of a registry for NMPs. It would provide
the authority to establish fees for any activity undertaken. In the first two years MOE
wíll coordinate the review and approvals of nutrient management plans and other
requirements for large operations, while OMAFRA wíll review and approve NMPs for
mid-sized livestock operations. The proposed legislation prohibits the delivery of
enforcement through an alternative delivery mechanism.
The proposed Act would re-affirm the ultimate authority of the Environmental Protection
Act, the Ontario Water Resources Act and the Pesticides Act. It would also effect
complementary amendments to these Acts, and the Farming and Food Production
Protection Act.
work?
The proposed Nutrient Management Act, 2001 would provide the authority to develop
and implement new, enforceable standards, supported by new inspection and
compliance measures and new authority for remedial action and provincial
enforcement. By recognizing the roles of both the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and
Rural Affairs and the Ministry of the Environment, the bill would provide a framework for
these ministries to work with a broad range of stakeholders to develop the specific
standards.
It
How would
would provide authority for regulations governing several areas, including
Collecting, storing, handling, using and transporting materials containing nutrients;
Establishing qualifications, education, training and certification for farmers and
others applying materials containing nutrients to land;
Establishing requirements for NMPs, including record keeping and filing;
Providing for the use, establishment and access to a registry in which NMPs would
be recorded;
Enhancing regulations for the use and application of land applied nutrients;
Establishing minimum distance separation requirements for land application and
buildings to protect land and water;
Using innovative technologies (e.g. composting) to manage materials containing
nutrients;
Mediating issues locally, including establishing local advisory committees: MOE wi
deal with any issues related to noncompliance;
Establishing categories of agricultural operations and standards relating to farm
practices for these categories.
Banning the land application of untreated septage over a
\~
period
five year
\1
Invite Ontario home
nv¡tez 'Ontario à votre table
It
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
72
4
be Implemented?
The bill would provide the authority to implement a risk-based approach called for in the
Managing the Environment report. Different categories of operations would be
regulated in different ways, focusing a greater level of attention and resources where
the risk to the environment is greatest. The bill would provide for a framework to phase
in standards over time, depending on the size of the operations and the kinds of
practices that are carried out.
it
How would
At a minimum the following categories would be defined:
· Large livestock operations (e.g. 450 livestock units)
· Smaller livestock operations
· Other agricultural operations (e.g. greenhouses, mushroom facilities, cash crops)
· Non-farm operations generating materials containing nutrients such as municipal
sewage treatment facilities. Non-farm nutrient generators would be categorized
separately from the agricultural operations.
Any number of sub-categories could also be defined to ensure that different types of
operations would be regulated in the most effective way.
All farms would eventually be governed by new regulated farm practice standards. New
standards would be established immediately for the new construction or expansion of
large livestock operations. They would apply to existing larger animal operations within
three years. Appropriate standards will be established for all other farms within five
years.
The bill would establish authority for a range of new approval and review requirements
designed to minimize environmental risks. These would be most stringent for large
livestock operations, which would need provincial certification, including approval for
their NMPs. These operations would be inspected by a team of provincial government
staff who are knowledgeable in agriculture and the environment.
Mid-size livestock operations wanting to build or expand would be subject to provincial
review. These and other agricultural and smaller livestock operations would be
responsible for having up-to-date NMPs available for inspection and review.
The bill would provide authority for several funotions including the review and approval
of NMPs, education and training and certification to eventually be managed
independently outside government.
Education and training requirements would be an integral part of the new legislation, so
that farmers and others with new responsibilities would be well-equipped to adhere to
its standards and regulations
be held over the summer.
\1
Next Steps
Consultations regarding
the provincial standards wi
Invite Ontario home
Invllez I"Ontario à votre table
\.
73
8&/13/81 22:87:81 EST ASSOCIATION OF?-> 1 519 &33 7&&1 CLERK-Elgin Co
Page 882
JUN-13-01 WED 04:22 PM AMO FAX NO. 416 971 6191 P 01
----..----.. -
, ATTENTION: Hea Members of Cou I
. '
~ .' vu15i'~>
. un I t"~ f·'~ ~~'11i
. ,,) :U.~ k11 '" . ii,
network Municom is pleased to announce that it has teamed up
with Vu8iz.com to offer a wide range of over 50 on-line
training modules available directly over the Internet.
Now you can take courses whenever you want on such
topics as e-business, community development, stress
management, quality control and personal productivity.
Every module is designed for interactive, self-paced
learning, and provides effective, leading-edge, practical
information 24 hours-a-day, 7 days-a-week from any
Int(~rnet connection.
Visit
www.municom.com
today
and click on "VuBiz On-line Training"
just under PRODUCTS & SERVICES
Muni~~~~,~~ j,;/:~:;;;~t~~~1 ~~.
1 .. .~",,(.¡.I:'\III t,i .\t"'~:~:;')!"~·'"d()II[Mr'l
. -
" 74
416-863-2101
Please Call
In Case of Transmission Difficulties
Division Registrars
The County of Elgin
Attention
Please Deliver To
® Ontario
Mlnl$tère des Services
aux consommateurs
et aLlX entfoprisðs
250, rLle Yonge. 3SO' étage
Toronto ON MSB 2N5
Ministry of
Consumer and
Business Services
250 Yonge Street, 35111 Floor
Toronto ON M582N5
12,2001
June
Date
Amendment to Regulation 1094 under the VITAL STA TISTICS ACT by
the Ministry of Consumer and Business Services (MCBS)
Subject:
Sir/Madam
The Office of the Registrar General (ORG) would like to inform you of a new regulation
which has been filed under the Vital Statistics Act and has now come into effect.
Dear
The new regulation enables registered nurses in the extended class, RN(EC)s,. to complete and
sign medical certificates of death when a deatA :~ ~xpected.
RN(EC)s must complete an educational session with the ORG in order to be able to
complete and sign Medical Certificates of Death.
The Expanded Nursing SeNÍces for Patients Act, introduced by the Ministry of Health
and proclaimed on February 11, 1998, allows registered nurses who have
demonstrated competence as Primary Health Care Nurse Practitioners and obtained
registration in the extended class, to have additional regulatory authority to perform
specific activities.
The Ministry of Health requested that one of the expanded functions for RN(EC)s
should be the completion and signing of a Medical Certificate of Death when:
last
legally
last
The nurse had primary responsibility for the care of the deceased during hislher
illness;
The death was expected during the last illness of the deceased;
A documented medical diagnosis of a terminal disease had been made by a
qualified medical practitioner during the last illness of the deceased;
There was a predictable pattern of decline for the deceased during h
illness; and
No unexpected events or complications arose during the last I
deceased.
is/her
ness of the
·
·
·
·
·
75
All registered nurses in Ontario currently have the authority to pronounce death when
death is expected. However, under the Vital Statistics Act, administered by the ORG,
only licensed medical doctors and coroners were able to complete and sign a Medical
Certificate of Death. As the certificate is required before a body can be moved, or
funeral arrangements can be acted upon, this can be a problem with considerable
emotional and practical impact upon bereaved families. The problem is accentuated in
isolated communities, where a physician may not be readily available.
This regulatory change will aid bereaved families by making it easier to arrange the
timely removal of a body and to make funeral arrangements, particularly in small
communities.
The educational sessions are scheduled to begin in June 2001. RN(EC)s will receive
materials in advance. Information about the sessions will be provided directly to the
approximately 400 qualified RN(EC)s.
76
Sincerely,
Judi Hartman
Deputy Registrar General
Constituency Office:
542 Talbot Street
SI. Thomas, Ontario
N5P 1 C4
Tel: (519) 631-0666
Fax: (519) 631-9478
Toll Free: 1-800-265-7638
Emai
yj
Ontario
STEVE PETERS, M.P.P.
ELGIN - MIDDLESEX - LONDON
Room 331
Main Legislative Building
Queen's Park
Toronto, Ontario
M7A 1A4
Tel: (416)325-7250
Fax: (416) 325-7262
Email: steve@stevepeters.com
steve@stevepeters.com
20m
JUN 18
14,2001
Honourable Chris Hodgson
Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing
17th Floor
777 Bay Street
Toronto, ON.
M5G 2E5
June
with
Dear Minister:
Please find enclosed a correspondence from the County of Elgin endorsing a City of
Woodstock resolution calling on your Government for much needed and deserved
financial assistance. The funding in question would be used to assist municipalities
their budgetrequirements and offset any municipal tax increases.
Minister, the source of financial concerns for Ontario municipalities like the County of
Elgin is clearly rooted in the Mike Harris Government's seemingly endless policy of
downloading services on already overburdened municipalities. As the Province has
already funded the City of Toronto to offset its budgetary needs, this request is both fair
and rationale.
I would appreciate your giving serious thought to this resolution, responding to the
County of Elgin and forwarding a copy of your letter to my office. I thank you in advance
for your time and consideration.
Sincerely,
~-'c ~~
Steve Peters, M.P.P
Elgin- Middlesex-London
77
Cc: The County of Elgin
Constituency Office:
542 Talbot Street
SI. Thomas, Ontario
N5P 1 C4
Tel: (519) 631-0666
Fax: (519) 631-9478
Toll Free: 1-800-265-7638
Ernail: steve@stevepeters.com
~
Ontario
STEVE PETERS, M.P.P.
ELGIN - MIDDLESEX - LONDON
Room 331
Main Legislative Building
Queen's Park
Toronto, Ontario
M7A 1A4
Tel: (416)325-7250
Fax: (416)325-7262
Ernail: steve@stevepeters.com
JUN IS' 2001
14,2001
Honourable David Young
Attorney General and Minister for Native Affairs
II th Floor
720 Bay Street
Toronto, ON.
M5G 2K1
June
Dear Minister:
Please find enclosed a correspondence from the County of Elgin in support of County of
Renfrew resolution. The municipality is calling on your Government to exempt municipal
partners managing Provincial Offences Courts from the requirement to pay filing and
enforcement fees to both the Small Claims Court and Superior Court of Justice.
Minister, the municîpalities present a strong case for the adoption of this resolution. As
the County notes, municipalities are attempting to collect fine monies, including victim
surcharges payable to the Province. Although these surcharges represent about 21 per
cent of the total outstanding receivables, municipalities are not exempt from paying
enforcement-related fees to the Government.
letter to
I would apprecîate your responding to the County and forwarding a copy of your
my office. I thank you in advance for your time and consideration.
Sincerely,
~~~
Steve Peters, M.P.P.
Elgin-Middlesex-London
78
Cc: The County of Elgin
Constituency Office:
542 Talbot Street
SI. Thomas, Ontario
N5P 1 C4
Tel: (519) 631-0666
Fax: (519) 631-9478
Toll Free: 1-800-265-7638
Email: steve@stevepeters.com
JUN 18 2001
~
Ontario
STEVE PETERS, M.P.P.
ELGIN - MIDDLESEX - LONDON
Room 331
Main Legislative Building
Queen's Park
Tei: (416)325-7250
Fax: (416) 325-7262
Email: steve@stevepeters.com
Toronto, Ontario
M7A 1A4
14,2001
Honourable Elizabeth Witmer
Minister of Environment
1 zth Floor
135 St. Clair Avenue West
Toronto, ON.
M4V lP5
June
Dear Minister:
Please find enclosed correspondence from the County of Elgin calling on your Ministry
to adopt legislative. and funding changes outlined in a Town of Amprior resolution. I feel
strongly that these proposals reflect a positive and rationale approach to bettering the
Province's environmental status.
Minister, as your predecessor Honourable Dan Newman indicated he would introduce
legislation in the spring of 200 1, logic suggests that your Ministry would be eager to
support an agreement between Ontario municipalities and participating industries to share
50/50 the net cost of residential recycling programs. Industries would also be required to
produce projects and packaging that meets environmental obligations.
I would appreciate your considering all proposals, responding to the County and
forwarding a copy of your letter to my office. I thank you in advance for your time and
consideration.
Sincerely,
~~
Steve Peters, M.P.P
Elgin- Middlesex-London
Cc: The COu1lty of Elgin
79
2001
JUN 18
NEWSLETTER
ST.THOMAS REACT INC. .M~%
.:'·'i}·'
P.O.BOX 20047 456 TALBOT 5T ST.THOMAS,ONTARIO N5P4H4 ' .
Fire Muster September 1 &2 @ Pinafore
Park
Event Includes - Parade, Fire Truck Ride,
Crafts, Displays, Breakfast in the park and
more.
This is the 19th year, and the event has
40,000 spectators regularly. There will be a
voluntary boot toll with all donations going to
Muscular Dystrophy Canada.
For more info. Visit
www.oeocities.com/MadisonAvenue/2902
Or Contact Ray Ormerod (519) 631 - 6991
or (519) 631 - 0210 or (519) 631 - 4771
Canada Summer Games 2001 -Basebal
August 12 -18 @ Doug Tarry Complex
For more info. Visit
www.canadaaames
call 1-866-773-2001
.com or for tickets
St. Thomas REACT's Upcoming
Events
June
Eastway Ford every Friday & Saturday Night
Kiss and Ride at St. Gabriel's School
Auto Fest June, 16th
Emergency Response Day June. 20th
Michelle Wright Concert June. 29th
Chatham Ontario
July:
Eastway Ford every Friday & Saturday Night
REACT car wash July. 14th
August:
Eastway Ford every Friday & Saturday night
Opening of Elgin Trail Pavilion AU9ust. 4'"
Aylmer Fair August. ah_12th
Railway Days August. 24th & 25th
St. Thomas Fire Muster August. 31st
Driver fatigue is the # 1 cause of
accidents during long weekends. Through
the years it has been our pleasure to assist
travelers by providing them with the
opportunity to enjoy refreshments, obtain
travel directions, as well as the use of a cell
phone in case of an emergency.
Our May.24 Safety Awake Break for
2001 was a great success. We had
approximately 100 travelers stop in and
enjoy coffee, a cold drink, popcom. and
hotdogs. We would like to thank all who
helped to make this Safety Awake Break
possible.
Dutton DunwichTownship - for the Eagle
Rest Area
Charltons Quality Meats - Hotdogs
Briwood - Hotdog Buns
Elgin Regional Mental Health Centre -
Popcorn Machine and supplies
Tim Hortons - Coffee
Lovedays - Gas for our generator
Corner Store - Ice
We would also like to thank all
StThomas REACT members and their
families for their time and support for making
this evenI possible.
REACTer Of The Month
January - Fred Satteriey
February - Mary-Ellen Hicknel
March - Robert Satteriey
April - Janice Soulliere
May - Angie Hillier
Safety Awake Break
September:
Eastway Ford every Friday & Saturday Night
St. Thomas Fire Muster September. 1st & 2hd
Kiss and Ride at St. Gabriel's School
80
Upcoming Events Around Town
Autofest June.15-17 @ Pinafore Park
Event includes - Car Show, Elgin Auto
Tour, Cruise night and much more.
Aylmer Rodeo June.23 -24
Aylmer Fair August. a -12
Event Includes - Rides, games and more.
Iron Horse Festival August. 16 -19
Event Includes -Ribfest, Rides, Railway
Display, Crafts, Exhibits and more.
If the need to take shelter does arise be sure
to take all medications and personal items
with you.
Never leave children unattended in or
around the water. Use C.S.A life vests
(Also known as Canadian Safety
Association) on boats docks, and
around deep or swift water.
Make sure children always wear a
helmet when riding a bicycle, scooter,
roller blades or a skateboard.
Protect children from excessive
exposure to sun - especially from 10am
- 4pm. Use a sunscreen with a SUN
PROTECTION FACTOR (SPF) of 15 or
higher.
Supervise children whenever they use
play equipment.
Keep children away from areas where
any lawn mowers are being used. Never
allow children to ride on mowers.
Minimize the risk of bee and insect
stings by having children wear shoes
and light colored clothing. Use insect
repellent sparingly on older children and
never on infants.
Know the plants in your yard and teach
your children not to pick or eat anything
without first checking with an adult.
CALL POISON INFORMATION
CENTRE AT 1-800-268-9017 if you
suspect a poisoning has occurred or to
receive a list of poisonous plants.
Keep children form playing around
barbecues and bonfires and always
have water present when fire is
involved. Only adults should use lighter
fluid.
Strap children in a properly fitting seat
belt, car seat or booster seat when
traveling by car or plane.
10. BE SAFE AND HAVE FUN THIS
SUMMER.
10 SUMMER SAFETY TIPS
1
2.
3.
How Not To Get Stung
Be aware of the presence of bees outdoors
especially in the vicinity of flowers. Bees
tend to sting if they feel threatened, so take
the following precautions when outdoors
- never disturb stinging insects' hives or
nests. Have a professional remove
them.
Don't swat I It angers bees and wasps
instead stay still - most likely they will
go away.
When outdoors cover sweet drinks and
fruit which attract bees.
Avoid wearing floral pattems or flowery
peñume around gardens. Stinging
insects are attracted by bright colors or
aroma's similar to real flowers.
Use caution outdoors following rain.
Stinging insects become aggressive
after pollen has been washed away.
4.
7.
8.
5.
6.
1
8
9.
What To Do If A Tornado Finds You
Tomado wamings and watches are on the
rise in Elgin County. Here is what to do if a
tomado finds you.
AT HOME - got to a basement, or move to
you homes lowest floor. Find an interior
room, such as a bathroom, closet or
hallway, and use your arms to protect your
head.
OUTDOORS - get inside a building or lay in
a ditch or low -lying area
IN A CAR - Leave your car and get into a
building, or take cover under a bridge
overpass or in a ditch.
It is best to be prepared, take a little time
now to assemble a few necessary items
- flashlight & batteries
portable radio & batteries
first aid kit
manual can opener
enough canned & dry goods to last 5
days
bottled water
fire extinguisher
blankets
extra clothes
-
In Case of Transmission Difficulties, Please Call 416-863-21Øl
Please Deliver To CAO/MAYOR/CLERK/TREASURERS
The County of Elgin
Minl&try of Minlslere des ~
Mun1cipal Affairs Affaire5 munlcipales
and Housing at du LogemÐnt
Office of the Minister Bureau du miolsue
777 Bay Street 777 rue Bay OntarIo
Toronto ON M5G 21:5 Taronto ON M5G 2E5
Tel, (416) 585·7000 Tol: (416) 585-7000
VoN{W,mÐ.h.gov.on,ca www.mah.gov.on.ca
June 18,2001
To heads of council:
I am writing to bring you up-to-date on recent changes to the Municipal Performance
Measurement Program, which we made in consultation with municipal representatives.
I also wish to advise you of the program's formal requirements for reporting to
taxpayers in 2001 (please see attached).
After we announced the program in October 2000, municipal stakeholders came to us
with concerns about the timing for reporting and the reliability of some of the data they
were asked to collect. Together, we worked out solutions that meet the objectives of
both levels of government and work for the citizens we all serve. As a result, this year's
deadlines and reporting requirements have been revised, but the program's goals -
higher-quality services, better value for tax dollars and greater accountability to
taxpayers - remain the. same.
The feedback we received was invaluable, and I appreciate the input and co-operation
of everyone involved. Specifically, I want to thank the Association of Municipalities of
Ontario, the Ontario Municipal Administrators Association, the Association of Municipal
Managers, Clerks and Treasurers of Ontario, the Municipal Finance Officers
Association of Ontario, the Ontario Good Roads Association and the Ontario Municipal
Benchmarking Project.
The new deadlines for submitting data to the province and for reporting to taxpayers are
June 30 and September 30, respectively. Although municipalities are still required to
collect data on all 35 measures, and submit them to province, they will report to their
taxpayers on fewer measures -16 rather than 35 (please see attached list of
measures). Most municipalities have been able to collect data for these measures
without difficulty and feel confident that the data are accurate and reliable.
The ministry has also set up an advisory committee with representatives from key
municipal stakeholders and the ministry. The committee recommended which
measures municipalities would report on this year and will advise the ministry on how to
further enhance the program for Year 2 and beyond. It will also look into the idea of
creating a Centre of Municipal Best Practices on Performance Measurement.
/2
82
2
have been encouraged to hear that many of you support performance measurement
as a management and accountability tool. I also think that measuring your
performances will assist you in business planning and operations. As the government's
recent Throne Speech stated, we remain committed to increasing accountability in the
public sector. I firmly believe that this program takes us a step forward in that direction
We should all keep in mind that this year is a starting point. Our program will evolve
further as we add service areas and further refine the measures. Over time,
municipalities will report publicly on a full range of results.
Within the next few weeks, you will receive detailed information on how you may
present the results of your performances to your taxpayers. In the meantime, please
continue to give me your feedback on the program and your ideas for further
improvements.
Sincerely,
d
Hon. Chris Hodgso
Minister
83
Chief Administrative Officers
Municipal Treasurers
Consolidated Municipal Services Managers
District Social Services Administration Boards
MPPs
c:
SCHEDULE
MUNICIPAL PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENTS
YEAR 2001 INFORMATION PUBLICATION FOR TAXPAYERS
of the Municipal Act on Junc 18,2001
(J) A municipality shall in respect of municipal fiscal year 2000 publish for the taxpayers of the
municipality the performance measurcment information designated in the attached chart (the
"chart"). The chart forms part of this Schedule.
1
Designated by the Minister under section 83
1
(2) The information publishcd by a municipality under subsection (I) shall include performance
measurement information for any planning board, police services board, public utility
commission or transit commission of the municipality.
(d)
(3) This section does not include any requirement for an entity described in clause (b), (c)
or (e) of subsection 83.1(1) of the Municipal Act to provide perfonnance measurement
information directly to taxpayers.
not later than September 30
shall publish the information required by section
A municipality
2001
2.
1
shall include with the information published under section
to which
in the chart and the fiscal year
A municipality at a minimum
the name of each perfonnance measure
it relates; and
(a)
(1)
3
the resuJt generated for the measure by the Ministry of Municipal Aftàirs and
Housing's electronic financial information return software, after the municipality
submits the relevant performance measure information to the Minister of
Municipal Affairs and Housing.
(b)
(1) through one or
the information referred to in subsection
(2) A municipality shall publish
more ofthe following methods,
a direct mailing to taxpayers or households;
(a)
(b) an insert with the property tax bill
one or more notices in local newspapers or advertising periodicals; or
posting the mformation on the Intemet.
(c)
(d)
84
APPLICATiON
If a municipality does not supply a service or function at any time in a fiscal year, section 1 does
not include any requirement for the municipality to publish information related to a service or
function designated in the chart for the fiscal year.
4.
In this Schedule, "supply" means supply pursuant to a statute, bylaw or resolution or an
arrangement or agreement with any person or municipality, and "supplied" has a corresponding
meaning.
5.
85
d
Minister
CHART
MUNICIPAL PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT INFORMATION
PUBLICATION FOR TAXPAYERS
MEASURES YEAR 1
Garbage (Solid Waste Management)
ton or per household.
A municipality providing information under item 1 shall provide the information on a per
household basis only if the information is not available on a per ton basis.
Operating costs for waste collection per
1
Percentage of residential solid waste diverted for recycling and tons of solid waste rccycled.
2
of sewage and stormwater per cubic metre treated.
Sewage
Operating costs for treatment and disposal
3
released into a lake or natural
sewage was
Number of hours when untrcated or partially treated
water course.
4.
Water
treated.
litres of water
water treatment per míllion
Operating costs for
5.
n water mains per kilometre of water main pipe.
Medical Officer of Health and
Number ofbreal<s
Number of days when a boil-water advisory issued by the
applicable to a municipal water supply was in cffect.
6.
7.
Roads
maintenance of roadways per lane kilometre.
Percentage of winter-event responses that meet or exceed municipal road maintenance
standards.
86
tòr winter control
Operating costs
8
9.
Transit
]0. Number of conventional transit passenger trips per person in the service area.
11. Operating costs tòr conventional transit per regular service passenger trip.
Fire
12. Operating costs for fire services per $1,000 of assessment.
Police
13. Operating costs for police services per $1 ,000 of assessment.
14. Perccutage of cases cleared for the following Statistics Canada categories: violent crimes and
property crimes. *
"'For the purposes ofreporting in 2001 the Year 1 (2000) results to taxpayers, municipalities shall only
report on violent crime and property crimc cases.
Local <;overnrnent
15. Operating costs for municipal administration as a percentage of total municipal operating costs.
Land-Use Planning
6. Percentage of designated agrieulturalland preserved.
87
~tÆ
~-~
OntarIO
Please Call 416-863-2101
The County of Elgin
Minìstère des Finances
Bureau du ministre
In Case of Transmission Difficulties
Please Deliver To
Édifrce Fros1 sud
7 Queen's Park Cres
TOlonto ON M7A 1Y7
1'él (416) 325-0400
Téléc (416) 325-0374
Ministry of Finance
Office of the Minister
Frost Building South
7 Queen's Park Cres
Toronto ON M7A 1Y7
Tel (416) 325·0400
Fax (416) 325·0374
12,2001
June
Co unci
I am pleased to announce that the Ministry of Finance's Community Reinvestment Fund
(CRF) consultations will begin shortly. During this time, the Province will seek input
from key stakeholders on the CRF for 2002 and subsequent years.
Head of
Dear
As a follow-up to our discussions with municipalities that took place in the fall of 2000,
we will be requesting input from municipalities and other key stakeholders through
written submissions, regional workshops and roundtables on the CRF. Specific details
on the consultations will follow shortly from staff. All municipalities are encouraged to
participate.
A number of changes have occurred since the Community Reinvestment Fund system
was designed. The Province believes it is now time to explore improvements to the
current approach so that it is more responsive to the future needs of our taxpayers. We
remain committed to a municipal-provincial relationship that will support the needs of
both the municipalities and the Province in building and maintaining vibrant, strong
communities.
1N1
Sincer y,
hit
James M. Flaherty
Minister of Finance
88
c: The Honourable Chris Hodgson
Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing
@
UNiVERSITY
ø<GUELPH
SCHOOL OF RURAL PLANNING ANI) DEVELOPMENT
Faculty pf Envimnmental Desìgn and Rural Development
Ontario Agricultural College
®
JUN 15 2001
is now complete.
in this important
Madam,
Our report on Nutrient Management Bylaws in the Province of Ontario
We would like. to thank you for your participation and cooperation
proJect. Pleasé find enclosed a copy ofthe report. .
Dear Sir or
The report will soon be available electronically via the website of the School of Rurdl
Planning and Development at the University of Guelph (www.uoguélph.ca/OAC/SRPD).
Please notify your lower tier municipalities about this source and its accessibility. We
will also notify municipalities independently through electronic mail. .
In order to fully understand the futl'reofNutrientManagerrient,we must first be aware of
current trends and practices in Ontario. Your assistance .indeveloping and sharing this
information is essential and greatly appreciated. Thank you once again.
89
Sincerely
~~vQ ,~/!-
Lucas Thacker
(5]9) 767-]692
FAX
.
(519) 824-4]20
N]G2W]
CANADA
ONTARIO
GUELPH
Report on
Nutrient Ma.nagement Bylaws
· t'h'P' · f'O" t ..
In"LeTOVlnce 0' '·)n iarlO
A Component of
Profiles of Livestock Agriculture and Impacts of
Regulation
,.-,
ì
,
I'
I
I
!
r
ì
I
I
,
r
I
r
I
I
Supported by OMAFRA Special Projects Fund
May 2001
r"
I
i
r"
I
r'
i
i
I
r-'
!
I
I
Prepared by:
School of Rural Planning and Development
University of Guelph
John FitzGibbon & Lucas Thacker
"
I
I
(
,.-,
I
I
Dr.
,.-,
I
I
(
UNIVERSITY
¡fGUELPH
r
I
I'
I
I,
('
I
I
1.0 Introduction
As concerns regarding agricultural nutrient production, storage, and use have become more
prevalent among Ontario's rural citizens, the concept of using legal avenues to manage these
nutrients has also become more common. Municipalities have taken steps to ensure that their
citizens are protected through the implementation of Nutrient Management Bylaws. The degree
of variation and coverage of these bylaws has not been fully explored. With Provincial
Legislation regarding Nutrient Management on the horizon it is important to examine existing
bylaws in order to provide insight of current trends and understandings of nutrients and
r~
I
I
r-
management.
Management Bylaws
The following is a list of municipalities in Ontario that currently have Nutrient Management
(NM) bylaws. This infonnation was collected through telephone canvassing and bylaw analysis
during the week of May 7, 2001. Italicized counties do not have a county-wide NM bylaw but
some municipalities within do. A map with this data is attached to this report (see Fig. I).
2.0 Municipalities with Nutrient
I
~
I
,
West Wawanosh
Lambton County
Lennox & Addington County
Stone Mills
Middlesex County
Adelaide Metcalfe
Lucan Biddulph
Middlesex Centre
South West Middlesex
Strathroy-Cardoc
Thames Centre
Norfolk County
Delhi
Norfolk
Northumberland County
Port Hope & Hope
Oxford County
Perth County
Perth South
Prescott & Russell
East Hawkesbury
Prince Edward County
Stormont, Dundas & Glengarry County
Wellington County
Erin
Minto
Puslinch
Wellington Centre
Wellington North
Durham Region
Scugog
Uxbridge
Brant County
Bruce County
Brockton
Huron-Kinloss
Kincardine
Saugeen Shores
South Bruce
South Bruce Peninsula
DujJerin County
East Garaftaxa
Melancthon
Mono
Elgin County
West Elgin
Grey County
Hastings County
Tyendinaga
Huron County
Ashfield
Colbome
Goderich
Grey
Hay
Howick
Hullet
McKillop
Morris
Stanley
Stephen
Tuckersmith
Turnberry
East Wawanosh
Usbome
:-
I
I
'I'
,
I
~
,
I
~
I
,
j
r~
,
:-
I'
r~
~
\
I
I
I
Bylaws has been complied and is
(see Table I). It provides a means of
summary of the infonnation is provided in
3.0 Detailed Comparison of Bylaws
A detailed comparison of existing Nutrient Management
presented in spreadsheet fonn as an attachment to this report
evaluating each bylaw in a number of general areas. A
4.0 of this report.
"
]
"
4.0 Summary of Bylaws
widely accepted to be the basis of most Nutrient Management bylaws are analyzed.
compared based on the most stringent requirement, least stringent requirement, normal
(most frequent) requirement, and the Oxford County (working model) requirement. Numbers in
parenthesis indicate the number of bylaws that comply with said requirement.
Categories
Each is
"
,
"
I
54
3 (OFEC, Niagara Region, Kent County)
57
56
Number of existing bylaws:
Number of models:
Number ofNM documents (total):
Number ofNM documents examined:
~
,
I
r
I
j
April 1997 (Morris, Huron County)
March 2001 (Melancthon, Dufferin County)
1999
Earliest Bylaw:
Most recent bylaw:
Oxford:
OMAFRA:
I'
i
Management Plan (NMP) bv Livestock Units (LU
25 L U (Lambton County)
200 LU (Prince Edward County)
150LU
150LU
any liquid facility or storage (Grey County)
Trigger for a Nutrient
Most stringent:
Least stringent:
Normal:
Oxford:
Note
"
i
I
~
I
I
& Glengarry County)
Dundas
1 LU/hectare (Stormont,
5 LU/hectare (41)
5 LU/hectare
2 LU/acre (5 LUlhectare)
Trigger for a NMP b
Most stringent:
Least stringent:
Normal:
Oxford:
r~
I
r
,
Definition of a Intensive Livestock Operation
Most stringent: 1.0 LU/acre (Stormont, Dundas & Glengarry County); 25 LU (Lambton
County)
200 LU or, when >50 LU, 2 LU/acre (Prince Edward County)
150 LU or, when >50 LU, 2LU/acre
150 LU or, when >50 LU, 2LU/acre
"
,
Least stringent
Normal:
Oxford:
OMAFRA
r
I
I
"
I
I
2
ODeratiOns
10 LV (20), 10%
20%(9)
any intensive operation (before or after expansion)
any intensive operation (before or after expansion)
(4)
increase
Re-tr er for a NMP for
Most stringent:
Least stringent:
Nonnal:
Oxford:
Maximum Distance from Land Base to Livestock Facili!
Most striugent: 4 km (Ashfield and Hay, Huron County)
Least stringent: no maximum distance (42), 25 Ian (Huron-Kin loss, Bruce County)
Normal: no maximum distance
Oxford: 10 Ian
66% (Lucan Biddulph, Middlesex County)
0%(42)
0%
0%
ReQuirement
Land Ownershi
Most stringent:
Least stringent:
Normal:
Oxford:
Centre and Middlesex Centre, Middlesex County)
5 years (Prince Edward County)
year (Thames
none required (25)
none required
NMP Renewal Period
Most stringent:
Least stringent:
3 years
Nonnal
Oxford:
Note:
many require annual manure lease agreements
365 days (Brockton, Saugeen Shores [Bruce County], Ashfield [Huron
County], Lucan Bictdulph, Middlesex Centre [Middlesex County])
o days (Perth County); 0 days for dry only (Grey County)
240 days
240 days
240 or 200 days
Least stringent
Nonnal:
Oxford:
Note
(15)
required with a twenty year agreement (Stephen, Huron County)
none required (11)
required
required
lot size for construction (96 acres) is only considered in Saugeen Shores (Bruce County).
(Bruce County) requires that at least 100 acres be owned in total
Lot size
Minimum
Kincardine
Incorporation
Incorporation of manure within 24 hours of application when near to dwellings is required by Saugeen
Shores (Bruce County) and West Elgin (Elgin County) while Huron-Kinloss (Bruce County) requires it
always except on hay.
3
Third Party A rova
Third Party Approval ofNMPs is required by most bylaws with the third party being OMAFRA,
Consultants or professionals certified by OMAFRA. Only four allow for Peer Review (Brockton, South
Bruce, South Bruce Peninsula [Bruce County], Grey County, Lambton County)
r
r--
I
í'
,
I
~
I
I
r-"'
i
I
r--
,
,
I
r
i
r--
i
i
r
I
,
r--
I
,
r'·"
i
I
I'
I
r
i
,
~-
uired
Stora
Most stringent:
is common
with third party approval
reements
Manure Lease A
Most stringent:
Least stringent:
Nonnal:
Oxford:
Enforcement
The municipality enforces each bylaw with inspection being the primary fonn of detection. Employees of
the municipality or others under authority of municipality perform inspections.
UniQue Traits
Some bylaws contain unique traits or interesting requirements. These are presented below.
Engineering reports (hydrogeological) are required by Saugeen Shores (Bruce County), Stone Mills
(Lennox & Addington), and Tyendinaga (Hastings County) while Lucan Biddiph (MIddlesex County)
requires them for liquid facilities only.
·
is
5 bylaws, dry manure storage
as liquid. In
wel
Nearly all hylaws apply to dry (solid) manure as
required to have considerations for liquid runoff.
·
II. Zoning hylaws are also
A consultant is required to prepare the NMP in 22 hylaws.
All hylaws comply with Minimum Distance Separation (MDS) I &
considered as are flood plains and environmentally hazardous areas.
102.0 and/or S. 210.0
Municipal Act S.
All NM bylaws are under the
·
is required in Norfolk and Delhi (Norfolk County)
Bacterial water test
·
is required in Hope (Northumberland County).
Elgin (Elgin County) and Hope (Northumberland
Liability insurance must be acquired in Saugeen Shores (Bruce County)
·
Road access in Saugeen Shores (Bruce County)
must have Class
Developments
·
in Saugeen Shores
land can be used for manure application in any year
Only 80% of total allocated
·
(EFP) is required in Saugeen Shores (Bruce County)
is required in Saugeen Shores (Bruce County)
monitoring
issues and
determine the distribution of costs
aids in nnderstanding the
5.0 The Future of this Project
This report is a component of a larger study that will
associated with Nutrient Management regulation. This report
collecting a general consensus about the realm of Nutrient Management regulation.
4
Any assistance or information that can be provided to update this report would be greatly
Please contact the authors of this report as follows.
Phone: (519) 824-4120 x3173
Fax: (519)767-1692
·
·
testing
is prohibited in West
Environmental Farm Plan
Tile drain and wel
appreciated.
School of Rural Planning and Development
C/o John FitzGibbon
Attention: Lucas Thacker
University of Guelph
Guelph, Ontario
NIG2Wl
~
I
r
I
r
!
,
r"
I
I
¡-'-
I
r
!
I
\'
¡
I
r~
I
I
t~
r·
I
,.
I
I
r
,
!
r
!
,.
!
r
Global Positioning Satellite (GPS) soi
Application on frozen ground
County)
·
·
·
·
"
I.
6.0 Conclusion
It is evident that there are many similarities and differences between the Nutrient Management
bylaws in existence throughout the province. The range and variation demonstrates differing local
concerns yet highlights the need for standardization. Analysis of existing regulation is needed to
understand the issues surrounding nutrient management. Dealing with these issues is essential but
can carry with it certain costs.
r-
I
,
r-
I
)
farmers. The dynamic nature of
and this report an exciting and
to
project
In the future, this project will work to establish these costs
modern agriculture and nutrient management makes this
important aspect of life in the Province of Ontario
r
r
r',
n
i'
I
r-
i
I
¡
r
I
I
I'
I
!
r-
! '
¡
r
I
i
I
5
o
SUDBUR
\{)
County-wide Bylaw
..
County with individual Bylaws
~::~~~~f~~~,
ESSEX
I l__ L__~ [ [ l L__ L_~ r l___ [-~.-._. C:..... r r L~_ L._____ l
-----" L___ '----- , L____
.-- -.-
'[ "
0
0 .
. " · £ ~ i ~
> 0 " z
~ I · 0 ~ " "
~ > .
ð .ß . " .
" ! 0 <
.. j I ~ . · ~
w ~ ·
Ii 0 ~ 0 ë ~ ~ 0
· 2
0 2 E " Æ
0 " 5
> " , , œ 0 " ~ j
õ . 0 ~ i 0 "
e · >
0 . " ~ " ~ . z ~ 0 "
U Q Z " œ z Q " Q 0 0
8rant ," Jul-OO 50 and >2 lUlacre same 16 00 00 3+"""""'111"".«$ 240 yes - OMAFRA or Consuftant yes+!I.!!loff 00 yo, nomechani5ffi
Bruce Brocklon Mllr·99 150 or 1.5 lUlacre ~m' 10 50 00 J J65 yo:<s - Peer Review Committee y" 00 yo, PeefReviewCmle
BllJce Kincardine Oct·QO SO or 1.5 lUlacre same 10 25 00 3+.'"''01'''1'.'''''.''''' 240, yes-not specified y" y" Peer ReviewCmte
Bruce SolJll1Bluce Ja1'l-OO 1500r 1.5 LUfacre same J10ne 00 00 J 240 yes-PeerReviewCornmittee y" 00 00 nomecharlism
8"", s. Bruce Peninsu!a Apr-OO 150 or 1.5 LU/acre same none 00 00 J 240 y" Peer Review Committee y" 00 00 nomecharJsm
Bruce SaugeenShores Jan-aO 75 or 0.75 lUlacre slime 16 50 yes-24 hrs> near a dw-emng 3+ onn"''''I'.'''''''~' 365-1000 yes - OMAFRA Bod Peer Rvw yes+runoff y" yes-4yr Peer Review Cmte
Bruce Huroo-Kinloss Ju~99 150or1.5LUlacre same 25 50 yes-24 hrs. except for hay J 240 yes - OMAFRA yes+ruooff '" 00 oomecl\anism
Ouffeno East GarafraXi! Nov-OO 150 orwheo >50,2 lUlacre Încreaseof 10lU oone 00 00 00 240 or 200 wapprvl (liquid) yes-pros and certified y" '" 00 no mechanism
Oufferin Mono Jan-OO 150 or when >50, 2lUlacre increaseof10lU 0,"' 00 00 00 240 or 200 w apprvl (úquid) yes-prosandcertified yo, 00 00 nom~hanism
DufleM Melancthon Mar-01 150 orwhefl>50, 2 lU/acre increase of 10lU none 00 00 00 240 or 200wapprvl (ijquid) yes-pros and certified yo, 00 00 flomechanlsm
Efgifl WeslElgin Feb--01 150 or when >50,5 lUA1ectare iflcreaseof21J% flone 50 yes-24 hrs,neara dwelling J 240 yes-consuKant '" 00 00 nomechBnism
Grey ,n 1999 all ~quid same none 00 00 2 241J(365foreartl\enpits) yes - Peer Review Committee 00 y" 00 nomecl\aflism
Hastings Tyendinaga Jun-OO 100 or when >50, 5 lUA1ectare same none 40 00 J 240 yes - OMAFRA or Consu~ant yes +rufloff 00 y" no mechanism
Huron Ashfield (ACW) 1998 100orwhefl>50,1.5LUlacre same 4 60 00 J 365 yes - OMAFRA y" y" y" Peer Review Cmte
Huron Colbome (ACW) Oct-98 75 or when >50, 5,OlUA1ectare increase of 10% none 60 00 J 240 00 y" y" yes-3yr Peer Review Cmle
Huron Godench(CH} Mar99 150 or when >50, 2lUA1ecatre increase of 20% oOfle 00 00 00 240 00 00 >250 '" Peer Review Cmle
Hurofl Grey (HE) Oct-98 1500rwheo>50,5lUA1ectare increase of 10lU nooe 00 00 00 240 yes - OMAFRA 00 yo, y" Peer ReviewCm!e
Huron Hay (B) No...-98 100 orllot1en >50, 5lUA1ectare iflcreaseof20% 4 60 00 00 200 00 y" '" y" Peer ReviewCmte
Huron HOwlek 1997 1500rv.tleo>50,5lUA1ectare increase of 20% oone 00 00 00 240 00 00 y" y" Peer Re'View Cmte
Huron HuUet(CH) 1998 1500rv.tleo>5IJ,5lUA1ectare increaseof10lU none 00 00 00 240 yes - OMAFRA 00 y" y" Peer Review Cmte
Huron McKillop (HE) Sep-98 1500rwhefl >50,5 lUA1ectare increase of 10lU none 00 00 00 2400nlyeo...ered yes - OMAFRA 00 y" yo, Peer Re'ViewCmte
Huron Monis(MT) ~-97 1500rwhen>50.5lUA1eclare increase of 20% none 00 00 00 240 00 00 y" yo, PeefRe\liewCmte
Huron S!anJey{B) May-96 1500rv.tlen>50,1.5lUlacre increaseof10lU 5 50 00 00 280 yes - OMAFRA yo, '" y" Peer Re\liew Cmle
Huron Stepl\eo(SH) Oct-97 1000rwhen>50.5lUA1eelare iocrease of 10% 4 00 00 00 280 00 yes when> 100lU y" yes-20 Peer Re\liew Cmle
Huron Tuekersrrull\(HE) Jan-96 1500rwtJen>50,5lUA1ectare increaseof20% none 00 00 00 21J0 covered 240 closed 00 00 y" y" Peer Review Cmle
Huron Tumbeny(MT) Jut-98 150 or when >50,5 lUA1eetare increaseof10lU none 00 00 00 240 yes - OMAFRA 00 yo, y" Peer Rev!eWCmle
Huron Usbome(SH) May-98 150orllot1en>50,5lUA1eclare increaseof10lU 10 00 00 00 280 yes - OMAFRA yeswtJen>150LU yo, y" Peer Re\liewCmte
Hurofl E.Wawnaosh(NH) Mar-OO 1500rwtJen>50,5lUA1eclare increase of 10 LU none 00 00 00 240 yes - OMAFRA 00 y" y" Peef Re\JÍew Cmte
Huron W. Wawnaosh (ACW) 2000 150 or when >50, 5 LUA1ectare increaseof10LU none 00 00 J 240 yes- OMAFRA y" y" yeS·3yr Peer Review Cmte
Kent Înterimconlrolon!y Oct-OO 150 or when >50. 5 LUA1ectare same none 00 00 00 none yes - OMAFRA or Consu~ant y" 00 00 nomecl\anism
Lambton " May-OO 25lU same none 00 00 J 240 yes - OMAFRA yes +runoff 00 y" Peer Re\liew Cmte
lennox&Addington Slone Mills Jun-OO 100orwtJen>50, 5 LUA1ectare same none 40 00 J 240 yes - OMAFRA or ConsuKant yes+runoff 00 '" no mechanism
Middlesex S.W.Middlesex·Mosa Aug-96 150 or when >50,2 LUlacre same oone 00 00 3+OMLJBIqO+m.,,, 240 yes- OMAFRA yest-runoff 00 y" Peer Review Cmle
Mid(!lesex S.W. Middtesex"EklTid Jan-99 150 orwtJen >50. 5 LUA1ectare increase of 20% none 60 00 00 240 yes - OMAFf~A yo, 00 y" nomecharllsm
Middlesex Thames Centre Jun-99 150or5LUA1ectare same none 00 00 1 240 yes - OMAFRA or pros yes+runoff y" yo, Peer Review Cmte
Middlesex Adelaide-Metcalf May-OO 150 or when >50,2 LUlaere same 1J 60 00 J 240 yes - OMAFRA yes+runoff y" y" Peer Re\liewCmle
Middlesex lucanBiddulph Ju..98 50 and >1.5 lUlacre increase of 10% 14.5 66 00 J 365 {100 for dry + 365 runoff yes-OMAFRA yes+ruooff y" y" Peer Re\liew Cm!e
Middlesex MiddtesexCentre Jan-01 15Q-6000r>5LUA1ectare same none 00 00 1 365 00 yes+runoff '" yes-3yr Peer Revfew Cmte
Middlesex Strathroy-Cardoc Jut-98 150 orwhen >50. 5 LUA1ectare increase of 20% none 00 00 00 240 or 200 with approval 00 y" 00 y" no mechanism
Norfolk NOrfolk Oct-97 150.or..men>50, 5 LUA1ectare inereaseof10lU none 00 00 00 240 or 200 with approval yes-pros and certified y" 00 y" no mechanism
Norfolk Delhi Mar-99 1500rv.tlen>50,5lUA1eclare increase of 10 LU none 00 00 00 240 or 200 with e.pproval yes-pros and certified y" 00 y" no mechanism
Northumberland Hope Oct-99 150 orwhefl >50,5 LUA1ectare iflcree.seof10% none 00 00 3+.ntIUaI.~.om..., 240 yes - OMAFRA or ConsuKant yes +runoff 00 '" Peef Re\liew Cm!e
Oxford aU (working model) 1999 50 and >2 LUlacre same 10 00 00 3+'''''''''01''.'''''« 240 yes - OMAFRA or Consuftafll y" 00 y" Peer ReviewCmle
Perth " Dee-98 150orwhen>50,2lUlacre same none 00 00 3+8MIJ.ro<}"oomelll' none yes-OMAFRAorpros y" 00 y', Peer Review Cmle
Perth Perth South Nov-98 100or..men>51J.1.0lUlacre same none 40 00 J 240 yes - OMAFRA or pros yest-runoff 00 yo, Peer Re\liew Cmte
Preseott&Russelt East Hawkesbury
PñnceEdward ,n Sep-OO 200 orwheo >50, 2lUlacre same none 00 00 5 240 yes - OMAFRA or Consuftanl y" 00 y" Peef Review Cmte
stormont, Dundas '" Oct·OO 1lUll\ectare) same none 00 00 00 240 or 200 wltl\ approval yes-pros and certified y" 00 y" nomecl\e.nìsm
Wellington Centre May-99 50 and >2 LUlacre increaseof10lU oone 00 00 J 240 or 200 w apprvl (liquid) yes - OMAFRA or Consultant yes+runoff 00 yo, Peer Re\lÍewCmte
Wellington Enn Jun-99 50 and >2 LU/aere inereaseof10LU none 00 00 J 240or20ŒwapPM{liquid) yes - OMAFRA or Consu~ant yest-runoff 00 y" Peer ReviewCmte
Wemnglon Puslinch Jun-99 50 and >2 lUlacre inCfeaseof10LU none 00 00 J 240 or 200 witl\ appM{liquid) yes· OMAFRA or Consuftan! y" 00 y" Peer Review Cmte
Wemngtoo WellingtoflNorth Mar-99 50and>2LUlacre inereaseof10lU none 00 00 J 240or200wHhapprvl(ijquid) yes - OMAFRA or Consultant y" 00 yo, Peer Review Cmte
Wellington Minto 1999 50 afld>2 LUlaere inereaseof10LU none 00 00 , 240 or 200 witl\ appM{liquid) yes - OMAFRA or Consu~aflt yo, 00 yo, Peer ReviewCmte
""",,m Scugog Jun-98 150orwhen>50,5lUA1ectare increase of 20% none 00 00 00 240 or 200 with approval yes - OMAFRA or pros y" 00 00 no mechanism
Durham UxI;¡ridge Jun-98 150 or when >50, 2 LUlacre increaseof10lU none 00 00 00 240 or 200 withapprovaf yes - OMAFRA or pros '" 00 00 nomecl\anism
Niagara modefonly Jun-OO 50 afld>2 LUlacre same 20 tn""".~ 00 00 3+""""'.¡)ilI!Ifl,"^I, 240 yes - OMAFRA or Consu~anl y" 00 y" Peer Re\liew Cm!e
OFECModel model Mar-98 150 orwhen>50, 2 lUlacre iflCl"easeof10LU none 00 00 00 240 or200 witl\ a roval ". ros and certified " 00 " no meChanism
;t,;!'!/"i}~~;~j_;~;:~A~r i:-'~-i,tti,.! / !i i.'.·'
.' '.it! /-""i·,tj ':>.'!:
.0.:X>(,':¡'C'nrn>·'··"··,·'r
V.
.
"";Dtt ""..,.;. ';;!;: ;,"
r--
L_p
L_
L__
l___
1_
L..
L_ _
L_
[-
l
l_
L_
1_ _
L__
1_-
[
Ð1
87 John Street South,
Aylmer, Ontario N5H 2C3
Telephone: (519) 773-5344
Fax! (519) 773-533'1
Email: malahide@township.malahide.on.ca
www.tòwnship.malahide.on.ca
PAGE
MALAHIDE TOWNSHIP
TOWflShiþ of
MALAHIDE
7735334
10:03
06;'25/2001
.
June 22, 2001
County of Elgin
450 Sunset Drive
St. Thomas, ON
N5R 5Vl
ir:
Dear S
Draft Plan COndjtio~r
.-/
proved
County of Elgin
Further to our telephone call of June 22, 200 I, please find attached t
the three lots owned by Mr. Mervis, regarding entrances that
driveways for the lots offHwy. #73.
Engineer,
Clayton Watters
Attention
dministration; alahide
ounty rather than a
Since the roadhas\been down graded d transferred to the County for
Township Council anticipated separate driveways would be granted b
mutual access point within the existing Hamlet of Copenhagen,
If it is .the policy of the County, "not (0 grant entrance permits to lots created along their road~l£.
within the .hamlet" it is of such a sigr1Ìtìcant nature that this policy should be clearly identifieds
and sent out to the member municipalities.
A number of our hamlets that have a County Road running through them, exist only at lot depth.
The configuration of those hamlets and extension of urban development along your roads would
definitely have to be reviewed if this policy is implemented.
Yours very truly
TOWNSHIP OF MALAHIDE
A~
R. Millard
CAO/Clerk
cc: Mark McDonald, County of Elgin
SUSAN E. WILSON
Tl'MSUrer
trea:!iuret@tOwMhip.malahide,on,ca
Emsi'
RANDALL R. MJLLARD
C.A.o.¡Ck,k
Em.'1.iJ;' cl~.'I'k@cownship.n\3lahidc.on.ca
Ð2
_ TA.-~ ~;.,.. ~hro
PAGE
MALAHIDE TOWNSHIP
lÐ:Ð3 7735334
TÄ-'~ -'.
A~ £)-ff p~ t1~
~.
ÐS/25/2ÐÐl
I~
"
.:.".
'.
,.
\11e Ministry of Transportation advise the owner that they will not grant more than two
mutual access points to. serve four of the five lots fronting on Highway 73. Lot 16
currently has access to Highway 73 which It will be permitted to continue to use
Road, Box
Permits must be obtained from their distrIct office loc!!ted at 659 Exeter
5338,London, Ontario N6A 5H2. (519-681-1441
IS reek Conservation Authority advise that the gullied area behind Lot 14
should have all organic material and dèbrls removed prior to lot grading. ThIs Area
will be backfilled arid regraded with a clay seal, The ravine which is adjacent to the
gully, and Incorporating the back.portions of Lots 25-31, should be protected from
Increased surface runoff wIth a soli berm and buried perforated tile. Two catchbasins
located at the ends of Lot 25 and 31, with an outlet drain carrying excess runoff to the
ravine, will control any erosion at the top of the embankment. The berm must be
seeded to. ensure slope stability.
The Ministry of the Environment advise that they have not conducted an exhaustive
examination of the. subject lands and that their approval should not be construed as a
guarantee that the site is completely usable for the intended use or that there are no
environmental constraints which might cause an adverse effect on plant or animal life
or.theenjoymerit of the normal use of the property. Their review of this draft plan did
not Include soil, groundwater or atmosphere testing to discount the possibility that
waste materials andóther contaminants are present within or in the general vicinity of
the subject prQperly. If either the applicant or the Municipality require this assurance
before pròceeding with the plan of subdivision, a consultant(s) should be obtained to
conduct the necessary Investigations
8.
The Ministry of the Environment advise that they must be notified should the
developer discover yJaste materials during construction stages. The discovery of
waste materials may require approval under Section 45 of the Environmental
Protection Act.
If the agency condition concerns conditions In the subdivision agreement, a çopy of the
agreement should be sent to them. This will expedite clearance of the final plan, A copy of
the agreementis not required by the Ministry of Municipal Affairs.
'"
w
-0
J>
G)
fTl
:s:
J>
r
J>
I
H
t:)
fTl
-i
o
E
Z
(f
I
H
-0
.....
.....
w
U1
w
w
.p.
....
'"
'"
w
.'"
m
,
IV
U1
"-
IV
'"
'"
....
-"" ~
1
:r:.
h
=-\.
r
"
-i
'"
..."
7"
o
"'"
o
'"
(TI
(7
...s
~
.,..
"'-
......
V'
, .'
,
~r~~~·.
"
¡f. # 73
'7-~
. .
-'("
.
J ~
I"
"0 ( .. i~
I
L~ a; ~Ir
'" I
.....
I .. I ~
~ ~ ""
.' :J.:
-:0 r,
;;::
'- r
;;:: -
~ ., ~
"
þ
- ~
~~
\ID
\ />
,,://\
·7 '- \
\
~' ¡\
, '
". I }
. I '
'I
¡
; "'I
,~/,~,\
'/~i I/Í;~~i
" .. /
~ .~ ~!!
..
o
~
"
..
,r
fq,.."".",....
..
~G.
'.
l'
~
1
I
.J L
J. L
.;,.
.:>
.:-;
..
----
.~~..! ~...".
~T~
I ¡ .
'-'
...'...-..i
"<b .~~D
s .
~ ~
< '
'"
Lf
,
;
r;~''''
'IG-~
"I-
- .. ,--.....
"- -.':
.... ...... : =.
: ..
!of..
-'"
·1
.p.
'"
.
..
--
..
.,:-....:!>'¥.\
.~~
"~':~
.... ~
..
ID
,.,
,
.
;". .~
___,.~-'~c."( ~:-oc
I;
,
I'
,
I
¡
I
'"
>
41(,
..
"Ÿ
, '"
. y
... "r.
7",
,
71-
G
. 1·
.., t
"-
~J:I-¡,(.!O··(. _ ".
.
.
.
'"
o
«
, ""
I
,
,-
·
·
·
MEMORANDUM
Bruce Mungar
or
Todd Cook and Counc
Mark G. McDonald,
Chief Administrative Officer
Mr
TO
FROM
2001
2001
Meeting on June 26th
June 13th
DATE
SUBJECT
Thèvarious Mayors and Deputies have agreed to remain after the County
Counc meeting on June 26th, 2001. to hear your presentation
shes
be available at 2:00 P.M
There is a special meeting of the Police Services Board scheduled for the
Chambers at 2:30 P.M. that day, so you will have approximately 30
minutes to make your presentation and to answer questions. We are
assuming that Mr. Mungar will be contacting and inviting those he w
to attend the presentation
Chambers w
The Counci
please do
f you have any questions
I
th your approva
I trust this meets w
not hesitate to call
Yours truly,
Mark G. McDonald,
Chief Administrative Officer.
450 SUNSET DRIVE
ST. THOMAS, ONTARIO
N5R 5V1
PHONE (519) 631-1460
FAX (519) 633-7661
MARK G. McDONALD
CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER
(Mrs.) SANDRA J. HEFFREN
DEPUTY COUNTY CLERK
June 7. 2001
fFiè;
1310
- Suite
Mr. Todd R. Cook
Disability Consultant
383- Richmond Street
London, Ontario
N6A 3C4
Cook:
Mr.
Dear
the
to appear as a delegation to
to County Counci
Thank you for your letter of May 5th, 2001, requesting
June 26th, 2001 meeting of Elgin County Council.
Delegation
Subject:
As we discussed yesterday, the City of St. Thomas, through an agreement made with the
County of Elgin, is the delivery agent responsible for social programs, including the Ontario
Disability Support Program. Protocol dictates that your request should be directed to
Mr. Chester Hinatsu at the City of St. Thomas, who will then inform the County of the most
appropriate course of action in this matter.
hold
I
the meantime. we wi
n
Mr. Hinatsu may be reached at 631-9350 extension 128
your request to appear at County Council in abeyance
Yours
Mark G. cDonald,
Chief Administrative Officer.
Central Elgin 1J V FI'I'¡(
The Municipality of
Councillor Bruce Mungar,
Warden Duncan McPhail
Mr. Chester Hinatsu, Director
cc
01/01
PAGE
CONS
TRC DISAB
519-438-1403
19:09
OS/24/19%
T.R.C.
TV CONSULTANT!
383 ¡a..-.. BIRI8I " SIIII8 1310
london. Ontario N6A 3C4
DISABILI
I
438-8001
TEL: (519)
.~~__~,.-w-",..-__·,....-,-,.._--"
2001
I>1&y 05,
the County of Elgin
Clerk of
To
2001
26,
JU1Œ
OF
COW:i:Y COWCIL HEBTIIiG
RE:
I have had recent conversations with Mr. BruceiiMungar regarding a
proposed meeting scheduled for June 26, 2001. liMy name is Todd R.
Cook of T.R.C. Disability Consultants Inc. I would like to be
p~aced on the Agen~a a~ter 2 pm for this meeti#g. I plan to
d~scuss the followlng lssues: 'I
( 1 Canada Disability Pension Appeals II
- the applioation process r
- the appeal process (deadlines and max. qualifying periods
~ costs aseociated with representation [I
- significan~ delays that oocur. II
- proper medl0al documents and advlce i¡
- draw-backs to local government represen#ation
II
Appeal!!
I
Dear Clerk:
Ontario Disability Support Pro~ram
- time~frame deadlines
- disability qualifications
- costs
2
I will also be addressing the need for profess~onal
representation at the government Tribunals andllPension Appeal
Board levels. I will answer questions from th~ floor as well.
. ;1
h k' . d I· ,
T an 1ng you 1n a vance. awa1t your respons~.
I
I
i