The URL can be used to link to this page

January 22, 2002 Agenda CORRESPONDENCE - January 22. 2002 Items for Information - (Consent Aaenda) 1. Bruce Hood, Air Travel Complaints Commissioner, Canadian Transportation Agency, announcing the availability of the 2nd Report on Air Travel Complaints. (ATTACHED) 2. P.J. Leack, City Clerk, City of SI. Thomas, with the names of the City 2002 Appointments to the Elgin-SI. Thomas Health Unit and the 9-1-1 Steering CommitteelElgin County Emergency Measures Committee. (ATTACHED) 3. Honourable Chris Hodgson, Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing, with information concerning the initiatives taken by the provincial government for new counter-terrorism measures. (ATTACHED) 4. Honourable Robert W. Runciman, Ministry of Economic Development and Trade, with information on the new web-based resource for economic development strategies. (ATTACHED) 5. John Dewancker, Director of Environmental Services, City of SI. Thomas, with a copy of the "Final Report on the SI. Thomas-Elgin Patient Shuttle (STEPS) Pilot Project- April 1999-July 2001". (ATTACHED) (Report is available for viewing in the Administrative Services Department) 6. Honourable Chris Hodgson, Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing, advising of the formal requirements for Year 2 of the Municipal Performance Measurement Program. (ATTACHED) 7. Easter Seal Society, requesting volunteers for the newly development "Elgin District Council". (ATTACHED) 8. Elgin 4-H Association, with "Friend of 4-H Award" recognizing Elgin County's contributions to the 4-H program. (ATTACHED) 9. Gar Knutson, M.P., Elgin-Middlesex-London, acknowledging Counil's support for the resolution of the Township of Havelock-Belmont-Methuen petitioning the province to return to the former health care system. 10. AMCTO Express, December 4, 2001 newsletter. (ATTACHED) 11. Honourable James M. Flaherty, Deputy Premier and Minister of Finance, aCknowledging Council's resolution regarding the proposed Public Sector Accountability Act, 2001. (ATTACHED) 12. G.H. Hallman, City Clerk, City of London, with a resolution concerning the need for the Province to provide the funding required to meet the area health care needs and representation from the Southwestern Ontario Pediatric Parents Organization for appointment to the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care's advisory committee on specialized pediatric services. (ATTACHED) 2 13. Honourable Brian Coburn, Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, acknowledging Council's resolution concerning Ontario Small Town and Rural (OSTAR) Development Infrastructure initiatives. (ATTACHED) 14. Pat Vanini, Director of Policy and Government Relations, with copy of correspondence regarding the creation of a Rail Renewal Task Force. (ATTACHED) 15. Gail Paech, Assistant Deputy Minister, Long-Term Care Redevelopment Project, Ministry of Health, with copy of correspondence concerning the delivery role municipalities play in long-term care facility services. (ATTACHED) 16. Honourable Tony Clement, Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care, acknowledging Council's support of Brant County's resolution to standardize a cost for cross-border Municipal services. (ATTACHED) 17. Frank Hall, Manager of Technical Services and Standards, Ontario Good Roads Association, regarding the Federal Government's move to designate inorganic chloride road salts as CEPA toxic. (ATTACHED) 18. W.H. Brock, Acting Executive Director, Children's Safety Village, with a thank you for the 2001 grant and a copy of the Village information book. (ATTACHED) (Book is available for viewing in the Administrative Services Department) 19. Steve Peters, M.P.P., Elgin-Middlesex-London, supporting Council's resolutions to: 1) Honourable Tony Clement, Minister of Health and Long-Term Care and the Honourable Allan Rock, Minister of Health, calling on the Government to ensure that Ontario returns to the former health services system. (ATTACHED) 2) Honourable Chris Hodgson, Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing, asking the Minister to review Council's resolution on Bill 8 - Safe Streets Act. (ATTACHED) 3) Honourable Chris Hodgson, Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing, concerning Council's support ofthe Town of Caledon's resolution with regard to the Provincial Consultation on Smart Growth Management Councils amended by Elgin County Council to include all of the Councils in Ontario. (ATTACHED) 4) Honourable Brad Clark, Minister of Transportation, concerning the issue of detours and deteriorating roads throughout the County. (ATTACHED) 20. Thank you card from the Harry Mezenberg Family. (ATTACHED) 21. AMO Member Communication ALERT: (ATTACHED) 1) Federal Budget Makes Added Infrastructure Commitments 2) Municipalities Get A New Municipal Act 3) New Legislation Mandating Move to Full Cost Recovery for Water and Sewer 4) AMO and Province Sign Historic Agreement 5) Prorogation of the Second Session of the 3yth Parliament Means..... AMO Member Communication FOR YOUR INFORMATION: (ATTACHED) 1) AMO Discusses Disability and Alternative Fuel Issues 3 2) Legislation of Significance to the Municipal Sector - Status Report 3) SuperBuild Hosts Drinking Water Financing Strategy Forum 22. Federation of Canadian Municipalities - Member Advisory: (ATTACHED) 1) Federal Budget Responds to FCM Investment Priorities - "Strong communities, stronger Canada" 2) FCM Position on Recommendation to List Road Salts as Toxic Under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act 23. Jack Layton, President, Federation of Canadian Municipalities, with a Preliminary Conference Program for the 2002 Sustainable Communities Conference and Trade Show. (ATTACHED) 24. Thank you card from Perry Clutterbuck. (ATTACHED) 25. Lori Chamberlain, Executive Director, SI. Thomas-Elgin Public Art Centre, thanking Council for the $5,000 grant in support of the Centre's visual arts program. 26. Honourable Chris Hodgson, Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing, with update on framework legislation to ensure safe and sustainable water services to Ontario. (ATTACHED) 27. Bryan Hall, Kettle Creek Conservation Authority, with news release concerning additional testing of Port Stanley Harbour. (ATTACHED) 28. Marlene Pink, Executive Director, Tillsonburg & District Multi-Service Centre, thanking Council for the $2000.00 grant. (ATTACHED) 29. AI Edmondson, Middlesex County Warden, with copy of correspondence to the Minister of Health and Long-Term Care petitioning the Province to fund 50% of the salary increases of land ambulance personnel. (ATTACHED) 30. Steve Peters, M.P.P., with copy of correspondence from the Honourable James Flaherty, Minister of Finance, regarding Council's resolution concerning gasoline taxes. (ATTACHED) 31. 2002 AMO Annual Conference registration form for the Conference and accommodation information. (ATTACHED 32. Honourable Tony Clement, Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care, concerning ministry funding re: ambulance labour negotiations and first contract arbitration. (ATTACHED) Office des transports du Canada Canadian Transportation Agency DEC 20 20m ,,'-ii'7 E·-".;.' Commissaire aux plaintes relatives au transport aérien December 2001 Air Travel Complaints Commissioner, .. <-.-. Dear Sir or Madam: On November 29, I had the pleasure of releasing to the public my 2nd Report as Air Travel Complaints Commissioner. The Report covers the period ITom January I, 2001 to June 30, 2001, during which my office received 1,664 written complaints that included more than 4,500 issues of concern ITom consumers who fly on domestic and foreign air carriers that operate in this country. This Report was also an opportunity to look back on the Office of the Air Travel Complaints Commissioner's tIrst full year of operation. Every complaint received was given deserved respect and consideration. In fact, the infoTmation thus collected forms the heart of the [mdings that I hope will go a long way to building a foundation upon which we can even better monitor future complaints and improve the quality of air travel service for both consumers and the air travel industry. This is especially important in light of the major changes in this country's air industry over the past year or so: ITom the acquisition of Canadian Airlines by Air Canada to the recent bankruptcy of Canada 3000. Under the legislation passed in July 2000, air carriers have a series of obligations relative to the services they provide to Canada's communities. The Air Travel Complaints Commissioner and the Canadian Transportation Agency can assist in finding a solution should you feel that a carrier is not living up to its responsibilities. Although there is no doubt that the introduction of a Complaints Commissioner has given the public a trusted place to voice its concerns, our job is far ITom over. We will continue to act as a champion for consumers who have legitimate complaints about their treatment by airline companies. We will also continue to track complaints to determine if any systemic trends are developing. And we will actively seek and encourage participation by consumer groups and industry representatives - ITom air carriers to travel agents and other air travel-related organizations - to ensure that air travel in Canada is the best it can be. The Report is available on the Canadian Transportation Agency's website www.cta.gc.ca. or for a copy, please contact the Agency at 1-888-222-2592 or bye-mail atatcc.cprta@cta-otc.gc.ca. Sincerely, ~~ Bruce Hood Ottawa (Ontario) K1A ON9 www.otc.gc.ca Ottawa Ontario K1 A ON9 www.cta.gc.ca Canadã 100 ", Peter J. Leack, M.P.A. City Clerk d¡J' . Ã..a(J:;"'-'J"". .<,~ ~4i'-:b'k,:'I,þ ,~i.C\1~ ~19,}..."" 'It/i. I·'," ,¡tl ¡~ )-'~ .- 'j' ¡I~' ," .....~ . . \_: "I' :¡i.,,' ~: '_,(i:-bJ /\_~ Office of the Clerk P. O. Box 520. City Hall 51. Thomas, Ontario N5P 3V7 Telephone: (5]9) 631-1680 Ext.lOO Fax: (5]9) 633-9019 \i~~~;¿¡ 'HE-;,~¡H~ ~é,~ DEC i 9 2001 Corporation ofthe City of St. Thomas December 14th, 200 I Ms. Cynthia St. John, Administrator Elgin-St. Thomas Health Unit 99 Edward Street St. Thornas, Ontario N5P 1 Y8 Re: 2002 Aooointments - Elgin-St. Thomas Health Unit Dear Ms. St. John: Please be advised that the Council of the COrPoration of the City ofSt. Thomas has appointed the following as the City representatives to the Elgin-St. Thomas Health Unit for 2002: Alderman Ray Parks Alderman Terry Shackelton AMerman Marie Turvey 9 McGregor Court, N5P 4H7 53 Luton Crescent, N5R 5V4 42009 McBain Line, N5P 3TJ 633-5832 633-6535 631-0936 A P. J. Leack City Clerk pc: Mrs. S. HefITen, Deputy Clerk, County of Elgin ~ 1 01 Peter J. Leack, M.P.A. City Clerk , ~~;;':~\'~~-' ,~ ~t"c""--'h ,r~.(~~ tHJ:t~ '.~·'-l'j, 0/1.,- ,"-i''-:-·'-·, ;~ ¡~ ",0jy; ~f;~~__- ',_ -,/~_~¿~,~. ~IV!':':~ ~~E~J-rJ.~,# Office of the Clerk P. O. Box 520, City Hall St. Thomas, Ontario N5P 3V7 Telephone: (519) 631-1680 Ext.! 00 Fax: (519) 633-90t9 DEC 20 2001 Corporation of the City of St. Thomas December 18th, 2001 Mrs. Sandra Hefften, Deputy Clerk County ofElgin 450 Sunset Drive St. 111omas, ()ntario N5R 5Vl Re: Appointments - 9-1-1 Steering Committee/El!!:in County Emer!!:encv Measures Comm. Dear Mrs. Heffien: Please be advised that the Council of the Corporation of the City of Sf. Thomas has appointed the following to the 9-1-1 Steering CommitteelElgin County Emergency Measures Committee for the year 2002: Alderman Marie Turvey 42009 McBain Line, RR#6 Sf. 111omas, N5P 3TI 631-0936 Fax:: 631-2778 Sincerely, P. J. Leack City Clerk ¡mlv 1rfr. Peter 1. Leack, City Clerk 631-1680 Ext.120 Mr. Roy Lyons, Fire Chief 63 I -0210 " y "~ ..J ŸJ. u"" . ;~v\O\ 102 In Case of Transmission Difficulties, Please Call 416-863-2101 Attention: Heads of Council Please Deliver To: The County of Elgin Ministry of Municipal AlIBil'5 and Housing Office of the Mlnis1er 7T7 Bay Stroot Toronto ON M5G 2E5 Tel: (41S) 585-7000 www.mah.gov.on.ca Mln1stère des Affail'êti munlelpales et du Logaman! Bureau du mil1is!tê !eÆ Ontario 777 ruo Bay Toronto ON M5G 2E5 Tél: (416) 585·7000 www.mah.gov.cn.ca December 19, 2001 To Heads of Council: The tragic events of September 11, 2001 have reminded us all of the key role governments play in maintaining public safety. As we work to ensure our citizens remain safe, it is essential that a balance be struck between the goal of protecting public safety, and the need to provide the public with information and services they may require. The need for such a balance is apparent in cases where a person or business requests aCcess to building plans held by a municipality. Care and sensitivity must be taken in authorizing disclosure, or in the decision to withhold access to the information. The Municioal Freedom of Information and Privacy Act grants municipalities the legal authority to restrict access to any records when disclosure could be reasonably expected to endanger the security of a building, or represent a serious threat to the health or safety of an individual. In making decisions about whether or not to disclose information, municipalities need to balance the goals of protecting public safety with the need to provide the public with information they may require. The provincial government has taken decisive steps to protect the citizens of this province. We are moving forward on tough new counter-terrorism measures designed to keep Ontario safe and prosperous. More information on these initiatives is available from the Government of Ontario's website, at www.gov.on.ca. Sincerely, ~ Hon. Chris Hodgso Minister 103 In Case of Transmission Difficulties, Please Call 416-663-2101 Attention: Heads of Council Please Deliver To: The County of Elgin Minister of Economic Dev~lopment end Trade Hearst B!od<. 811'1 Floor 900 Bay 51. Toronto, OntariO M7A 2E1 (416) 32S·6900 Fax (416) 325·6918 www.ontario-canada.com Mlnlstre du Développement écanomlque et du Commerce ÉdWce Hearst. 8& Biage 900, rue Bay Toronto (Onfario) M7A 2E1 (416) 32S·6900 Télécopieur (416) ~25-6918 www.ontarlo-canada.com ~tÆ ,,"".. Onl,'1r;e Dccember 19,2001 Dear Friends; Weare pleascd to announcc, on bebal f of Ontario government ministries invol ved in providing community and economic development services, a new resource tool which has bcen developed - the Community and Economic Development Resource (CEDR). This new web-based resource is designed to help you advance your community's economic development strategies. Whether you are just getting started, or looking to rejuvenate your community and economic development plans, CEDR can help you identify tl1e range of strategies available and show how Ontario's programs and serviccs can help you. This web site was developed through a partnership of provincial ministries involved in delivering community and economic developmcnt programs and services. Thc information is presented by topic areas which will be of intercst to Ontario communities as they consider their community and economic development opportunities. For each topic area, information is provided on: the strategy and it's importance; provincial programs and services; . specific examplcs of the strategy in action; and . possible next steps for your consideration, including web site locations for furthcT Ontario government infommtion and the contact in your area. We hope that you will find CEDR useful and welcome your comments and suggestions for future site enhancements. Please visit the CEDR site at: www.cedr.gov.on.ca. ~ "mcerely, L~ I ... ~(! Robert W. Runciman, MPP Leeds-Grenville Minister ~ ...4 c. The Honourable Chris Hodgson The Honourable Dan Newman The Honourable Nonnan Sterling The Honourable Tim Hudak The Honourable Cam Jackson The Honourable Brian Coburn The Honourable Diane Cwmingham , 104 JOHN G. DEW ANCKER, P.Eng. Director of Environmental Services All correspondence to be addressed to: PO Box 520 - City Hall Annex St. Thomas, Ontario N5P 3V7 Telephone (519) 631-1680 Fax (519) 633-9019 BURT LONG Manager of Operations PETER HEGLER, MASc. P.Eng Manager, Engineering & Transportation The Corporation of the City of St. Thomas December 12, 2001 File No. 05-051-03 Mark G. McDonald Chief Administrative Officer County of Elgin Administration Building 450 Sunset Drive St. Thomas Ontario N5R 5V1 DEC 1'<' 2001 Re: St. Thomas - Elgin Patient Shuttle Project -Final Report The St. Thomas - Elgin Patient Shuttle Advisory Committee has discontinued the S.T.E.P.S. demonstration project as of July 31st, 2001. The NEAT committee has prepared its report whichhas be presented to the Ministry of Health regarding non emergency ambulance transfers in the southwest region of the Province. It would appear that any S.T.E.P.S. funding from the Province is on hold. On October 10, 2001 the Provincial Government announce a 3billion dollar program for transit in Ontario which would require a two thirds funding commitments from the Federal and Municipalities Government. Details of the Provincial plan are not yet available but early information indicates that funds may be available for alternative no emergency medical transportation. From its inception in May of 1999 through July 31, 2001, STEPS delivered 3,115 patient trips in St. Thomas, Elgin County, and to and from medical facilities in London. Ofthese 531 (17%) werefor ambulatory patients, 1967 (63%) for patients in a wheelchair, and 617 (20%) were for stretcher patients. These relative proportions must be viewed with caution, since STEPS ambulatory patient transportation only operated from April 1999 to April 2000, and the transportation of stretcher patients did not begin until January 2000. STEPS resumed limited transportation of ambulatory patients late in 2000, as part of the arrangement to take dialysis patients from the A ylrner area to specialized treatment in London. This arrangement, brokered by the YON volunteer transportation program, is noteworthy because five or more patients travelled on the same STEPS vehicle to coordinated appointments at the London Dialysis Centre. In the three-month period from July through September 2000, following the suspension of ambulatory trips, 70% of STEPS patients used a wheelchair, while 30% used a stretcher. -- 105 With the wrap up of the S.T.E.P.S. demonstration project, staff and the S.T.E.P.S. Advisory Committee has prepared a final report to be presented to the Elgin County and St. Thomas City Councils. The final report will include usage figures, and a complete costing of the S.T.E.P.S. program is attached for your infonnation. In November 1997 the Elgin - St. Thomas Community Transportation Project (CTP) was started at a cost of $46,252 (Provincial Government - $43,000, St. Thomas $3252). A recommendation from the CTP established the S.T.E.P.S. demonstration project which began in May of 1999 transporting non emergency medical clients to appointments in Elgin County, St. Thomas and to health service providers in London. The STEPS demonstration project concluded July 31, 2001 at a total cost of $215,293. Funding for the STEPS demonstration project has been provided by the County of Elgin - $83,560, City of St. Thomas - $63,7333, Elgin Community Care Access Centre - $43,000 and the St. Thomas Elgin General Hospital- $25,000. The S. T.E.P .S. Advisory Committee would like to thank Council for their support and direction with the S.T.E.P.S. Demonstration Project. Respectfully submitted on behalf of the STEPS Planning Committee, J:kwh~g Director Environmental Services cc: Members of the STEPS Planning Group Mr. Charles Fitzsimmons, Transportation Consultant, Techknowledge Consulting John Roberts, Transportation Coordinator, City of St. Thomas Karen Dunn, Emergency Measures Coordinator , 106 Final Report on the St. Thomas Elgin Patient Shuttle (STEPS) Pilot Project April 1999 -July 2001 Elgin-St. Thomas Community Transportation Committee July 2001 Prepared by TechKnowledge Consulting Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................... 1 2. DESCRIPTION OF THE STEPS PROJECT ..................................... 3 3. EVOLUTION OF STEPS SERVICE ............................................4 4. STEPS PERFORMANCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 5.. EVALUATION DATA. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7 6. CONCLUSIONS ........................................................... 11 APPENDIX ONE: ............................................................ 13 APPENDIX TWO ........................................................... .14 APPENDIX THREE .......................................................... 15 Final Report on the STEPS Pilot Project April 1999 -July 2001 1. INTRODUCTION The attached report summarizes the operational phase of the St. Thomas Elgin Patient Shuttle (STEPS) project, from April 1999 through July 2001. This report presents a description of the STEPS project, an overview of its perfonnance, the most significant evaluation criteria, and conclusions. STEPS was designed to demonstrate the concept of an alternative non emergency medical transportation service. It was intended to address the need for dependable, low-cost, readily available transportation for patients who would otherwise have used an ambulance. STEPS was based on the brokerage model, whereby one agency maintains service contracts with several different transportation providers, and provides centralized access to these services. Requests for transportation are routed by the brokerage operator to the appropriate class of service, i.e., wheelchair-accessible vehicle, or stretcher van. Within a given class of service, requests are assigned to the various providers by a rotation system intended to provide an equitable distribution of work among the contractors. Among the strengths of the brokerage model are that it can be implemented with a minimum of administrative overhead. A brokerage eliminates the need for capital investment, and provides a "pay as you go" arrangement under which charges are only incurred when service is actually being provided. While high,volume operations might eventually find it economical to own and operate vehicles, a modest-scale start-up such as STEPS benefited significantly from the brokerage model. STEPS was designed, implemented and monitored with assistance from a project consultant, Charles Fitzsimmons ofTechKnowledge Consulting, who specializes in alternative patient transportation, and could help apply lessons learned from similar projects in Waterloo Region and Kingston. Criteria for evaluating the project are set forth and discussed in some detail in Section 4. However, the general conclusion of the Elgin St. Thomas Community Transportation Committee is that the STEPS project has been an encouraging success that has accomplished all of its major objectives. The most important conclusions are that: · STEPS has shown that there is significant demand for an alternative to the ambulance for non emergency transfers. · It has demonstrated that this type of transportation can be provided safely and efficiently, earning a high degree of acceptance from agencies in the health care sector. · It has proven that an initiative of this type can lead both pri vate and public sector transportation providers to create new resources. Two St. Thomas taxi companies each purchased and staffed a stretcher van, and made wheelchair-accessible vans available to STEPS. St. Thomas Paratransit, the municipal provider of accessible transportation, made a vehicle available to STEPS when it was not occupied with its primary assignment of paratransit. A similar contribution was made by the Canadian Red Cross with its wheelchair van. Final Report on the STEPS Pilot Project April 1999 - July 2001 1 of 15 . STEPS stimuIatedcreative, cooperative solutions to transportation problems, in which relationships that developed during the project between people from organizations in the health care, volunteer and transportation sectors, led to innovative approaches. The initiative to transport five dialysis patients three times per week from the Town of A ylmerto synchronized appointments at the London Health Sciences Centre at a fraction of the cost of separate trips is the most noteworthy example of this outcome. Planning, funding and operating the STEPS project required bringing together people from the municipal, health care and transportation sectors, and from private, public and volunteer-based organizations, with a wide range of professional expertise and experience. For this achievement, much credit is due to the initiative shown by council members and staff of the City of St. Thomas, which seized the opportunity for start-up funding made available between 1995 and 1998 by the Community Transportation Action Program (CT AP) of the Government of Ontario. Closely associated with the City from the outset was the County of Elgin, whose unfailing financial support and encouragement enabled STEPS to continue through all the phases of its development. At the end of December 2000, the relative contributions totalled approximately $83,560 from Elgin, $69,520 from St. Thomas, and $43,000 from the Province of Ontario. In January of2001 the Community Care Access Centre and the St. Thomas Elgin General Hospital donated $43,000 and $25,000 respectively to continue the STEPS program while alternate funding sources where explored. The origins of the STEPS project can be traced back as far as 1992, when the Victorian Order of Nurses conducted a County wide transportation survey. This study revealed that both rural and urban residents with special mobility needs often had problems with their medical transportation needs. When the Elgin-St. Thomas Community Transportation Committee began in 1997, in response to the Provincial CT AP program, its own data and analysis confirmed that medical transportation was a definite need, and gave it the highest priority for a pilot project. In summary, STEPS demonstrated important benefits. · Efficiency and cost-control. The modem health care system, characterized by the concentration of services in fewer facilities, and high volumes of out patient procedures, requires punctual, readily available patient transportation to run at maximum efficiency. STEPS provided this needed logistical support, virtually eliminating missed appointments and reducing time facility staff spent on patient transportation issues. · STEPS trips, at an average cost of$62, cost substantially less than using ambulances for transfers. Brokerage vehicles are less costly than ambulances, and their crews are paid at a lower rate than paramedics. · STEPS relieved the ambulance system ofIow priority calls that would either tie up local ambulances, or result in costly billings for the use of ambulances from other municipalities. · As a purelynon-emergency service, whose schedules are immune from interruptions for emergencies, STEPS offered a degree of reliability that made it a valuable complement to the ambulance. Ambulances are a limited resource. STEPS made it possible to conserve this resource for emergencies and for transferring high-risk patients. · From the patient's perspective, an assured on-time service reduced anxiety and suspense, and the frustration and consequences of missed appointments. Final Report on the STEPS Pilot Project April 1999 . July 2001 20115 2. DESCRIPTION OF THE STEPS PROJECT The St. Thomas Elgin Patient Shuttle (STEPS) project was an initiative to provide stable medical patients with transportation to and from medical facilities by creating a brokerage to act as intermediary between those requesting transportation, and those who provide it. Hospitals n-home care services (CCAC) Request for transportation Request for transportation Request for transportation STEPS Brokerage St. Thomas Paratransit Cox Cabs Best! Cabs and Couriers Figure 1: Schematic of the STEPS brokerage final Report on the STEPS Pilot Project April 1999 - July 2001 30115 The brokerage operated as a clearing house. It perfonned the following functions: · It accepted reservations (only by fax, and only from health care professionals), · It assigned a provider from the pool of available vehicles, according to a rotational system, · It scheduled the trip, and confinned the booking by telephone to the requester, · It functioned as a dispatch centre, adjusting the service as required, and providing fast turn around of short notice requests. · It prepared reports for the City of S1. Thomas (STEPS Administration) These brokerage activities were perfonned by Cox Cabs, under contract to the City of S1. Thomas. Cox Cabs also has the contract from the city to operate S1. Thornas Paratransit. The schematic in Figure 2 below illustrates these processes. Receive request by fax from health care professional Book the trip with provider Call back requestor, canfinn booking time. Prepare monthly operations report Figure 2: Schematic of the STEPS brokerage operation 3. EVOLUTION OF STEPS SERVICE The STEPS project was an outcome of the community transportation coordination process initiated by the City ofS1. Thomas in September 1997, and guided by the Elgin S1. Thomas Community Transportation Committee. When the service began in May 1999, it served ambulatory and wheelchair passengers within a 20-km radius ofS1. Thomas. The single exception to this was that a STEPS transfer point was established at the Bobier Home forthe Aged in Dutton, to enable residents of West Elgin to travel to and from any part of the service area. During the first seven months of service, STEPS camed about fifty trips per month, for a total of nearly 300 patients. In January 2000, in response to encouragement from its partners in the health care sector, STEPS introduced two major enhancements: it made stretcher service available, and began carrying patients to and from medical facilities in London. STEPS could introduce stretcher services due to the fact that Cox Cabs and Bestt Cabs and Couriers had each purchased a van capable of carrying a stretcher, and had trained two-person crews to operate the vehicles. Offering London as a destination was aresponse to advice from the representatives of the St. Thomas Elgin General Hospital, the Victorian Order of Nurses, and the Elgin Community Care Access Centre, that there was a definite need for STEPS service to be extended to London. Final Report on the STEPS Pilot Project April 1999 - July 2001 40t 15 The response to these two service enhancements was dramatic - STEPS Ridership doubled almost immediately. This was definite confirmation of the need to add stretcher capability and to serve London facilities. A Sharp Rise in Demand fot Service Within four months of initiating stretcher service and service to London, demand for SJEPS transportation was moving steadily upward toward 300 trips per month - a level that was well beyond what the pilot project budget could sustain. Since, as a brokerage, STEPS settled its invoices individually with each service provider, with invoices arriving at different times during the month, it was only gradually apparent that STEPS' financial situation was becoming unsustainable. However, by the Spring of2000, it was cIearthat SJEPS was heading for financial difficulty. Service costs were exceeding revenues, and something had to be done to restrain demand and increase revenues. To address these issues, the project consultant advised the City of St. Thomas to do two things, suspend service to ambulatory persons, and to begin charging patients a fee for all trips except those between medical facilities. City officials agreed, and these measures were introduced in April 2000. The rationale for suspending ambulatory service was that reductions had to be made somewhere, and that patients who can walk have more choices fortransportation than wheeIchair or stretcher patients, and therefore could get along better without STEPS than the non-ambulatory patients. The argument for charging a user fee was that this practice is common in municipally-supported services, that a user fee could be expected to depress the soaring demand to some extent, and would generate some much-needed additional revenue. A Lesson about Process These measures were introduced with very little notice to health care providers. Soon afterwards, the STEPS Planning Committee took issue with the lack of consultation before these major decisions were taken and implemented. While these measures were successful, and did in fact enable STEPS to keep going, an important lesson about process was leamed. STEPS was a partnership. Major decisions in a partnership have to be made by a process of consultation among all the partners. Aside from the issue of process, it is also possible that if the STEPS Committee had been properly consulted, better solutions might have been found than those that were adopted, and our health care partners would not have been inconvenienced and made to scramble to find other arrangements for their patients. Collection of the User Fee Because STEPS was an experimental project, with the bare minimum of administrative resources, the introduction of the user fee had to be done without incuning additional administrative costs, as would have been the case if it had to move towards a system of invoicing and cash management. The introduction of the userfee was really only possible because Cox Cabs and Bestt Cabs and Couriers agreed to collect this fee on STEPS' behalf, and deduct it from their own billings to the program - one of the many ways in which these two companies made vital contributions to the project. Final Report on the STEPS Pilot Project April 1999 - July 2001 50t 15 In the event, suspension of ambulatory service and the user fee, plus additional injections of money from Elgin County and the City of St. Thomas, kept STEPS in operation for all ofthe Year 2000. Ensuring the Long-term Survival of STEPS As the STEPS pilot project was coming to an end at the close of the Year 2000, the two councils set in motion a process to ensure the long tenn survival ofthe service. They each voted interim funding to enable the service to operate into the new year 2001, and delegated a member of each council to work with local health care agencies to obtain additional interim operating funds. But the key to the councils' strategy is to enable STEPS to make its transition from a municipally-supported service to one that is funded primarily by the health care sector. Crucial to this long tenn strategy is the collection and analysis of data on the impacts of STEPS on the efficiency and effectiveness of health care facilities and programs. To enable such data to be assembled, the Councils have put forward a project, developed by the Elgin St. Thomas Community Transportation Committee, that calls for Ministry of Health funding so that STEPS can be extended for a three to five year period. In March of2001, this proposal receivedfonnal support from the Thames Valley District Health Council. It is now in the hands of the Ministry of Health, awaiting a decision. 4. STEPS PERFORMANCE Ridership From its inception in May of 1999 through July 31, 2001, STEPS delivered 3,115 patient trips in St. Thomas, Elgin County, and to and from medical facilities in London. Of these 531 (17%) were for ambulatory patients, 1967(63%) for patients in a wheelchair, and617 (20%) were for stretcher patients. Notes: 1. These relative proportions must be viewed with caution, since STEPS ambulatory patient transportation only operated from April 1999 to April 2000, and the transportation of stretcher patients did not begin until January 2000. 2. STEPS resumed limited transportation of ambulatory patients late in 2000, as part of the arrangement to take dialysis patients from the Aylmer area to specialized treatment in London. This arrangement, brokered by the VON volunteer transportation program, is noteworthy because five or more patients travelled on the same STEPS vehicle to coordinated appointments at the London Dialysis Centre. 3. In the three-month period from July through September 2000, following the suspension of ambulatory trips, 70% of STEPS patients used a wheelchair, while 30% used a stretcher. Distribution of STEPS Usage by Facility Type All STEPS trips were initiated by a request placed on behalf of a patient by a health care professional, such as a VON nurse, a hospital nurse, ward clerk or discharge planner, or an in-home care case worker. Periodically, these requests were tabulated to determine the relative usage by the three principal health care contexts: acute care (hospitals), long tenn care (licensed nursing homes) and in-home care (multiple providers, coordinated by the Elgin Community Care Access Centre). Final Report on the STEPS Pilot Project April 1999 - July 2001 60115 For the sample period from July to November 2000, the proportions were: · Long Term Care facilities: 40 % · Elgin Community Care Access Centre (In-home care): 35% · St. Thomas Elgin General Hospital: 25% About 70% of the requests originating at Long Term Care institutions came from privately-owned facilities. Further details of this tabulation are available in the Appendix One. Proportion of trips to and from London During the sampled period, July through October 2000, about 40% of STEPS trips had London medical facilities as the origin or the destination. Such trips were always to or from Elgin County. STEPS did not provide local transportation within the City of London or Middlesex County. Cost per Trip For 2000, the average cost of a STEPS trip was $62, which included the cost of transportation and the brokerage fee that covered reservations, scheduling and dispatching. Not included in this cost were the administrative support provided by the City of St. Thomas and the project consultant. 5. EVALUATION DATA Safety In 24 months of operations, from May 1999 through May 2001, STEPS provided more than 2,800 patient trips without accident or injury. This perfect safety record is a tribute to the quality of the services provided by STEPS' contractors. Risk Management As a component of the start up process, the STEPS project had the consultant prepare a risk assessment. This document identified areas of potential risk, and strategies to manage and minimize risks. Six risk factors were identified, ranging from operational to administrative risks. This assessment was undertaken as an element of due diligence in this experimental project. In view of the perfect safety record of STEPS, this risk assessment seems to have been a productive one. Maintaining Service Quality Responsibility for the quality of STEPS service was maintained through the terms of the service contract with the brokerage operator and with the service providers. These contracts made the providers responsible for equipping and maintaining their vehicles to high standards, and ensuring the training and readiness of their crews. Similarly to the risk assessment, the project developed a quality assurance process, that identified measures to ensure adequate quality in the areas of planning, bookings, service quality, complaints, liaison with clients, standards for service providers. Even though it was an experimental project that brought togetherpeople and services from the public, private and voluntary sectors, and required an effective interface to be established between the vastly different worlds of health care and transportation, STEPS generated very Final Report on the STEPS Pilot Project April 1999 - July 2001 70115 few complaints, and developed a solid reputation for quality in the brokerage operation and in service delivery. In this connection, the high standards maintained by the service providers: Cox Cabs, Bestt Cabs and Couriers, and the Red Cross, were an important factor in the success of STEPS. One of the key lessons of the project was that taxi companies can provide very high quality transportation services to the brokerage. A key factor was the high degree of personal commitment on the part of Cox and Bestt management to ensuring excellent quality service. The Brokerage Concept in a Mixed Rural-urban Area SIEPS has demonstrated that a transportation brokerage in a large, predominantIyruraI area with a strong urban base can work very successfully if the core city is strongly supportive. The initial impulse to start SIEPS, and all the basic services of the program came from St. Thomas. However the survival of the project was made possible by the commitment and support of the County, and of local health care providers. This support was encouraged and mobilized by the firm foundation of community support. The core membership of the Elgin-St. Thomas Community Transportation Association consists of 18 organizations. For the list of these core members, please see Appendix Two. Development of Effective Working Relationships Projects similar to SIEPS have been successful in Waterloo Region (Moo-Lift), and in Kingston Ontario (Kingston Area Patient Shuttle). However, initiati ves of this type have been unsuccessful in other parts of the province. Certainly a major factor in all these successful projects has been that municipal governments, transportation providers and health care agencies were able to develop the effective working relationships that have empowered STEPS from the beginning. Community Support The Community Transportation Committee, which evolved into the SIEPS Planning Committee, made a decision in 1998 to assign the highest priority for action to improving non emergency medical transportation. As the SIEPS project began to take form, the Committee oversaw the planning and management of the service. The list of the core members, in Appendix Two, reveals a diversified body: the City of St. Thomas, Elgin County, the community hospital, the in-home care coordinating body, several longterrn care facilities, the ambulance service, transportation providers, voluntary associations and registered charities. The support ofleading people in the health care sector undoubtedly played an important role in the survival of SIEPS as a pilot project. The City ofSt. Thomas and Elgin County received continual encouragement from representatives of the St. Thomas Ambulance Service, the Elgin Community Care Access Centre, and the Victorian Order of Nurses. Representatives of these agencies were usually on hand at council meetings to speak in favour of SIEPS and to answer questions. This firm and united community support may well have been a decisivefactorin maintaining municipal support for the project. Positive coverage in the St. Thomas and County press was also a positive factor. Final Report on the STEPS Pilot Project April 1999 - July 2001 80115 Transportation Forums Another very significant contribution to STEPS were the two public forums on transportation organized by the Volunteer Program of the Victorian OrderofNurses. Each of these events attracted approximately 80 people from a broad spectrum of city and county community organizations. The presentations and discussions at these forums heightened awareness of officials, the media and the public of the transportation problems and the services available, with due emphasis on the STEPS pilot project. Use of the Service The fact that the service was embraced and used by health care facilities and professionals was also of great significance. S1EPS deliberately raised barriers to the use of the service, to help ensure that patients whose medical condition required transportation by ambulance would not find their way onto S1EPS. One of these barriers was the requirement for a written and signed request for transportation to be faxed in to the brokerage. Compared to the ease of picking up the phone and dialling the ambulance number to request an ambulance, the STEPS procedure was not user-friendly. Health care professionals are increasingly busy and stressed, and less and less disposed to procedures that make claims on their time. The requesters had to find a form, take the time to fill it out, and then find an available fax machine. The fact that S1EPS actually provided 2,800 trips in 24 months in spite of this ordering process suggests that there was a great need for STEPS, and that the service reliability and quality lived up to expectations. Creation of New Transportation Resources The existence ofS1EPS provided local transportation companies with the prospect of an additional market for their services. Theirresponse was to create the resources that would enable them to compete for this market. As a result, S1EPS had the effect of increasing the transportation resources available not only to STEPS itself, but to the general public. The creation of wheelchair and stretcher resources was especially important, as prior to S1EPS there were few local wheelchair vans available for hire, and no locally operated stretcher vehicles. Three additional wheelchair vans were brought into service - one by Cox Cabs and two by Bestt Cabs and Couriers. Each of these two companies obtained and staffed a stretcher vehicle - the first ever operated in Elgin County. STEPS was therefore a stimulus to substantial investment on the part of locally-owned businesses. Developing medical transportation brokerage skills The S1EPS project enabled a local taxi company, Cox Cabs, to obtain experience in operating a medical transportation brokerage, and in dispatching non emergency medical trips. Fostering Innovatiou The S1EPS project encouraged innovation. Among the features of the project that were innovations in Elgin-St. Thomas, and in some cases for the entire Province of Ontario, were the following: 1. The reservations, scheduling and dispatching functions of the brokerage were perrormed entirely by a private sector company under contract to the brokerage. 2. The fleet available for STEPS service combined vehicles from public, private and volunteer sector organizations. Final Report on the STEPS Pilot Project April 1999 - July 2001 9 of 15 3. The brokerage contractor dispatched trips to a competing company, under the umbrella of STEPS cooperation. In the highly competitive taxi environment, this was a very significant innovation. The rotation system introduced, while not in itself novel, was an innovation in the sense that it was extended to companies that compete with one another. 4. The possibility of transferring between volunteer-based and professional transportation was introduced through the STEPS transfer point at Bobier Villa, by which West Elgin residents could transfer to or from a STEPS vehicle to complete a journey anywhere in Elgin, or to a London medical facility. 5. The Aylmer group transportation to dialysis treatments introduced the concept of ride-sharing in medical transportation, in which a number of patients share a high-capacity vehicle that is able to accommodate both ambulatory and wheelchair patients. 6. STEPS made possible the introduction of block booking of specialized treatment appointments at the London Health Sciences Centre Dialysis Unit (LHSC). Under this concept, patients from the same geographic area are booked for treatment at the same time. The LHSC was able to implement block appointment booking because it was confident that STEPS would get patients to their appointments reliably and at the same time. This arrangement was as a result of collaboration between the Victorian Order of Nurses, the LHSC, STEPS and Cox Cabs. 7 . Vehicle and service quality standards were set and maintained through the brokerage service contracts. Because there is no regulatory framework fornon-ambuIance medical transportation, this mechanism was necessary to ensure service quality. It has been effective, vehicles and crews perfonned to acceptable standards, there were virtually no complaints about service quality, and there have been no safety incidents. 8. High usage of the service by in-home care programs. A significant number (35%) of referrals are being done by in-home care professionals, whereas in Waterloo and Kingston this function is perfonned almost entirely by facility staff Job Creation STEPS had a modest, but positive impact on employment in Elgin-St. Thomas. The 2,800 trips provided in 1999 and 2001 are estimated to translate into about 5,000 paid hours of work, which is roughly equivalent to two and a half full-time positions for a year. Impacts on Patients STEPS seems to have brought significant improvementto the quality ofIife of the people it transports. The Transportation lifelines conference sponsored by the Victorian Order of Nurses in October 2000 provided insights into one such story. A dialysis patient from Aylmer, with severe physical and sensory disabilities gave amoving testimony of what STEPS meantto her, saying that it had made a tremendous difference in her life. She no longer worried about her transportation to dialysis, whatever the weather. Her STEPS ride was always on time. The vehicle was easy to board and to ride in. The driver took good care of her . She Final Report on the STEPS Pilot Project April 1999 - July 2001 100115 no longer had to struggle to cross the hospital parking lotin rain and snow. STEPS always saw her right to the door of the hospital. Impacts on health care system There is little hard data at this time on which to base an evaluation of the impacts of STEPS on the health care system. Indeed, this lack of data is the basis of the argument for extending STEPS into the future while a systematic evaluation of its impacts on the health care system can be monitored. However, anecdotal evidence gleaned from the health care agency representatives on the STEPS Planning Committee supports the conclusion that STEPS achieves the following benefits: · A reduction in the staff required to arrange for transportation. · Increased confidence that scheduled patient appointments will be kept. · Increased ability for facilities to send and repatriate clients according to the facilities' scheduling needs, rather than on the basis of when transportation will be available. · Physicians whose offices are not accessible to wheelchairs can more easily schedule patient appointments at the hospital, knowing that the patient can get to the appointment on time. · Enhanced ability for in-home care programs to maintain patients in their homes. Access to treatments that are only available in medical facilities is more readily available, whatever the patient's mobility needs may be. STEPS probably does reduce the operating costs of facilities and health care programs. The wiIJingness of the St. Thomas Elgin General Hospital and the Elgin Community Care Access Centre to provide financial support for STEPS in 2001 indicates that these providers consider STEPS to be of significant benefitto their mandates. 6. CONCLUSIONS 1. STEPS has successfully demonstrated the feasibility of a non emergency medical transportation brokerage in Elgin-St. Thomas. 2. STEPS has been beneficial to patients, health care programs and facilities and to the community. 3. More data is needed on the impacts of STEPS on the efficiency and operating costs of health care programs and facilities. 4. There is a need for comprehensive data on ambulance volumes and costs, including comparative data from elsewhere in the region, on which to base conclusions about the potential for containing ambulance costs, improving dispatch efficiency and enhancing Elgin's net position relative to neighbouring municipalities with respect to inter-municipal ambulance billings. 5. A systematic study is needed of the impacts of STEPS on the efficiencies and costs of health care programs and facilities. Ideally, this study would include data from a neighbouringjurisdiction with similar characteristics, but without an organized non emergency medical transportation brokerage, so Final Report on the STEPS Pilot Project April 1999 . July 2001 110115 as to have experimental control data. It should also contrast the situation for local facilities and programs before and after STEPS as much as possible. Final Report on the STEPS Pilot Project April 1999 - July 2001 120115 APPENDIX ONE Origins of Requests for STEPS Service (Based on all requests for STEPS service in the sample period: July - September 2000) Requester I Trips Percentage Long Term Care (LTC) Bobier Villa 20 4.4% Caressant Care 20 4.4% Chateau Gardens 6 1.3% Elgin Manor 22 4.8% Extendicare 96 20.9% Terrace Lodge 8 1.7% Valleyview 14 3.1% Subtotal LTC 186 40.5% Home Care Elgin Community Care Access Centre 160 34.9% (includes London Health Sciences Centre) Acute Care St. Thomas,Elgin General Hospital 113 24.6% Totals 459 100% Final Report on the STEPS Pilot Project April 1999 - July 2001 130115 APPENDIX TWO Core membership of the Elgin-St. Thomas Community Transportation Committee January 2001 Organization Contact 1 Association for Community Living Tom McCallum 2 Bestt Cabs and Couriers Kathy Cook 3 Canadian Red Cross Society Sharon Lechner 4 Caressant Care Nursing Home Vicki Snowsel1 5 City of St. Thomas Sharon Crosby 6 County of Elgin Mark McDonald 7 Cox Cabs Terry Banghart 8 Elgin Community Care Access Centre Nancy FazackerIey 9 Elgin Paramedics Association Jim Malik 10 Elgin County Homes for Senior Citizens Marilyn Fleck 11 Elgin-St. Thomas United Way Terry Carrol1 12 Extendicare Charles Marczinski 13 London Health Sciences Centre Westminister Gail Crook 14 St. Thomas Elgin General Hospital Ambulance Service R. Furnish 15 St. Thomas Elgin General Hospital Anne McVety 16 Town of Aylmer Bob Habkirk 17 ValIeyview Homes for the Aged Keith Lunn 18 Victorian Order of Nurses DJ Smale 1n addition to these, a further 18 organizations and facilities receive updates on the STEPS program. Final Report on the STEPS Pilot Project April 1999 - July 2001 14 of 15 APPENDIX THREE STEPS Ridership Figures April 1999 - July 2001 Cox Cabs Best! Cabs and Red Paratransit Totals Couriers Cross Ambulator Whee1cha Stretche Wheelcha Stretche Wheelcha Wheel y iT f if f if Chair 1999 May 5 2 0 0 0 0 7 June 38 6 0 0 0 0 0 44 July 14 0 0 0 0 0 18 32 Auvust 12 0 0 0 0 0 18 30 Sentember 12 0 0 0 0 2 4 18 October 26 0 0 0 0 2 8 36 November 22 0 2 0 0 0 12 36 December 25 0 II 0 0 3 9 48 Total 1999 154 8 13 0 0 7 69 251 2000 J anuarv 51 0 20 0 0 0 14 85 February 107 20 49 0 0 0 II 187 March 161 2 60 0 0 20 28 271 Amil 58 23 36 35 16 16 36 220 May 0 31 28 70 21 18 6 174 June o ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 July 0 30 13 36 15 I 0 95 Awmst 0 59 22 59 18 6 0 164 Sentember 0 39 23 52 10 6 0 130 October 0 55 18 60 18 5 0 156 November 0 86 3 81 22 0 0 192 December 0 70 3 75 13 2 0 163 Total 2000 377 415 275 468 133 74 95 1,837 2001 J anuarv 0 61 13 55 2 8 0 139 Februarv 0 48 23 44 16 3 0 134 March 0 63 II 55 13 9 0 151 Ami! 0 52 18 43 17 8 0 138 May 0 70 14 60 18 0 0 162 June 0 62 8 59 19 4 0 152 July 0 48 7 76 17 3 0 151 Total 2001 0 404 94 392 102 35 0 1027 Grand Total 531 827 382 860 235 116 164 3,115 Ambulatory 531 17% Wheelchair 1,967 63% Stretcher 617 20% 3,115 100% Final Report on the STEPS Pilot Project April 1999 - July 2001 15 of 15 In Case of Transmission Difficulties, Please Call 416-863-2101 Please Deliver To; Chief Administrative Officers Municipal Treasurers The County of Elgin Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing Office of the Minister 777 Bay Street Toronto ON MSG 2ES Tel: (416) 585·7000 www.mah.gov.on.ca Ministère des Affaires mLfnrclpales et du Lcgement Bureau du ministre 777 rue Bay Toronto ON MSG 2ES Tél: (416) 685·7000 www"mah.gol¡,on,ca 1eÆ ~ Ontario December 10, 2001 To Heads of Council: I am writing to advise you of the formal requirements for Year 2 of the Municipal Performance Measurement Program and to acknowledge the great efforts and spirit of co-operation that went into revising the program for 2001. At the suggestion of municipal leaders, my ministry formed an advisory committee last spring. Committee members provided advice on both the process of refining the measures used for the first year of the program and the 25 measures for Year 2. Attached is a list of measures that apply to reporting for municipal fiscal year 2001. You will notice that the deadlines for sUbmitting data to the province and for reporting to constituents are June 30, 2002 and September 30,2002, respectively. You may access the formal requirements made under Section 83.1 of the MuniCipal Act at www.mah.aov.on.ca. Detailed definitions and instructions for the 2001 financial information return will follow shortly. I owe special thanks to committee members: the Association of Municipalities of Ontario (AMO), the Ontario Municipal Administrators Association, the Association of Municipal Managers, Clerks and Treasurers of Ontario, the Municipal Finance Officers Association of Ontario, the Ontario Good Roads Association and the Ontario Municipal Chief Administrative Officers' Benchmarking Initiative. I also want to thank municipal leaders for their efforts in submitting performance data to the province as well as acknowledge the many interesting models that municipalities developed for reporting this information to their taxpayers. This program is a key component of the Government's efforts to improve accountability to the citizens of Ontario and to support the case for wider powers for municipal councils as outlined in Bill 111. We can all agree that taxpayers are entitled to this information. Taxpayers can use it to become more involved in discussing services needs and priorities with their councils. Councils can use it not only as an accountability tool but also in business planning and operations. , 107 12 -2- To Heads of Council Most important, municipalities province-wide Can use this program to share and adopt best practices. To facilitate that exchange, the Ministry will work with AMO and other organizations to create a Centre for Ontario Municipal Best Practices this winter. In the meantime, I continue to welcome your feedback and suggestions. If you have questions on the requirements of Year 2, please contact your local Municipal Services Office. Sincerely, d4-- Hon. Chris Hodgson Minister Attachment c: Chief Administrative Officers Municipal Treasurers MPMP Advisory Committee Members 108 easter seal SOcietlJ Creating solutions, changing lives. 4dW)l~ Helping kids with physical disabilities and their families THE EASTER SEAL SOCIETY Call for Elain County District Council Members The Easter Seal Society, Ontario has been helping children and young adults with physical disabilities reach their highest level of independence since 1922. Today, over 8000 families rely on the Society to purchase expensive equipment needed for mobility and communication, send kids to summer camp and respite, provide access to information and resources and invest dollars in research and prevention. Recognizing the benefit of local community support, The Easter Seal Society is pleased to be developing the Elgin District Council. The Elgin District Council will bring together everyone in the community who is interested in Easter Seals - parents, service club members, teachers, nurses, doctors, social workers, volunteers, donors, business leaders, professionals and many others. The Society is presently recruiting volunteers for the following positions: · Chair · Vice Chair · Chairs of Administration, Finance, Fundraising, Community Service, Communications & Advocacy and Public Education. If you have a passion for helping children and youth with physical disabilities and possess the skills, energy and enthusiasm to assist the Easter Seal Society in this new and exciting direction, please forward a covering letter and resume to: The Easter Seal Society 332 Wellington Rd. S. Unit #2 London, Ontario. N6C 4P6 Tel: (519) 432-9669 Fax: (519) 432-7679 Email: Isharma@easterseals.org ,~ ,"109 TlON ~. "",:'?ì' Date: Sl6NIFICANT 1:(£ 4-11 PR06f!1lJ!~ üt~ i§ I ~?~ f1~ ~ %1~i. &;. î# U¡; W',{,,<. ~ )¡- ,,~,~~~i' ~"', "f4 -'''MS¡';- Si I 110 HOUSE OF COMMONS CANADA qar'l(nutson, :M.P. Elgin ~ Middlesex - London DEC 5 2001 December 4,2001 f~LGHr~ Mrs. S.l Heffren Deputy Clerk County of Elgin 450 Sunset Drive St. Thomas, ON N5R 5V1 Dear Mrs. Heffren: Thank you for forwarding rne a copy of council's endorsement of the resolution of the Township ofHavelock-Belrnont-Methuen petitioning for the 'return of the fonner health care system. ' Noting, specifically, council's concern about downloading from the province to the municipality of the delivery of health care services. I appreciate being apprised of the interests of the community. Your correspondence of November 28,2001, helps to keep me infonned. Yours ttuly, ~ Gar Knutson, MP OK: smc OTTAWA OFFICE Room 832 Confederation Building House of Commons K1AOA6 Tel. (613) 990-7769 Fax (613) 996-0194 E-Mail: knutsg@parLgc.ca .+. CON5TITUENCYOFFICE 499 Talbol St. 51. Thomas, Ontario N5P 1C3 TeL (519) 631-3921 1-800-265-7810 Fax (519) 631--8555 E-Mail: gknutson@execulink.com Please circulate to: Mark G. McDonald ... !i!AMCTO EXPRESS... December 4, 2001 AMCTO MEMBERSHIP SURVEY Just a reminder, if you have not already completed the AMCTO Membership Survey, it only takes 15 minutes to complete. We need your input! The survey is being conducted through www.amc!o.comin the "MEMBER LOGIN" section of our site. Please refer to the instructions noted below to obtain access to the MEMBER LOGIN area. If you have a user name (login) and password that is all you need. All responses go directly to a third party who will be collecting the data and compiling it for analysis. Your responses are confidential. Please respond by Thursday December 20th so that the results can be compiled and available for consideration by the AMCTO Board of Directors at its February meeting. If you have not received your user name and password to enter the members' section, or if your e-mail address has changed and you are not able to access this section, you must e-mail your name, membership number and your individual e-mail address to: siqnup(àlal11cto.com and a password will then be forwarded to you via e-mail. Once you've received your password please go to Y.!!'£!I~.?D.l£1,ç-,£QŒ.! to complete the survey. You will see the Member Login button in the bottom left corner on the home page. Click this button and enter your user name and password and hit the login button. The Member Survey Button is located first (to the left), just click this button and fill in the survey. Please note, if you have access to any computer with internet and e-mail capabilities you will be able to complete the survey on-line by following the instructions noted above. Please take 15 minutes to give us your feedback. We are listening and we will respond. If you are unable to access the survey from the AMCTO web site please call Lori at 905-602-4294 (ext. 25), or fax her at 905-602-4295 or contact her bye-mail at Lmicucci@.amcto.com and Lori will fax you a copy of the survey. Complete it and fax it back to the Corporate Renaissance Group, to John Hitsman at 613-232-7276. The final analysis of survey results is expected to be completed by early February. A Fax Express will provide information on the results to all members. Thank you for your participation. PROVINCIAL AUDITOR'S 2001 ANNUAL REPORT: COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT FUND (COURTESY OF THE C.G. GROUP) The Provincial Auditor, Erik Peters, issued his 2001 Annual Report yesterday (November 29h, 2001). Part of the Report addressed the effectiveness of the Community Reinvestment Fund (CRF) in achieving the goal of revenue neutrality as a result of the Local Services Realignment (LSR) -- the municipal downloading exercise begun in January 1998. The Auditor acknowledged that although the revenue neutrality objective is not set out in legislation, the then-Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing, in discussing the CRF in the Legislature, stated on October 8, 1997 that "we'll be able to distribute the Community Reinvestment Fund so that every municipality will come out revenue neutral." It was the aim of the government to achieve revenue neutrality not only annually, but also between the government and municipalities as a whole, and also between the government and each individual municipality. The Auditor noted that the Ministry recognizes that: "... the current structure of the CRF demands a high level of accounting and administration effort. It also recognizes that, with its current focus on LSR costs and residential education tax room, the current CRF does not address the full range of municipal expenditure needs and fiscal capacity. " Therefore, the Ministry started a review of the CRF program and a range of options was being considered for providing financial support to municipalities in future. The year 2001 was considered a transitional year pending potential program changes resulting from the review. It should be noted that the Auditor's Report encompasses the period to March 31, 2001. Because LSR ministries were still in the process of finalizing data for the 2000 calendar year at the time of the audit, most ofthe analysis and testing was conducted on data for the 1999 calendar year. Page 10f2 1 1 1 Audit Objectives The objectives of the audit were to assess the extent to which: "Adequate procedures existed to measure and report on whether the CRF was meeting its objective of ensuring that the LSR initiative was revenue neutral; and . CRF system controls and related procedures were adequate to ensure that municipal payments were properly authorized and accurately processed." Audit Conclusions The Auditor concluded that the Ministry did not have adequate procedures to measure and report on whether the CRF was meeting the revenue neutrality objective. In addition, evidence indicated that the CRF did not ensure the ongoing revenue neutrality of the LSR initiative, either as a whole or for individual municipalities and that this problem had been growing over time. The divergence from revenue neutrality was observed in both directions: some municipalities have gained financially from the LSR trades, while other municipalities have lost. Therefore, the Auditor believes the CRF as structured at the time of the audit did not meet the objective of ensuring revenue neutrality of the LSR initiative. In addition, it has led to varying impacts on individual municipalities. other Observations: · "For programs fully transferred to municipalities, LSR costs for CRF entitiement purposes were frozen at the amounts existing at the time of program transfer. As a result, the actual costs incurred by municipalities in subsequently delivering these programs were not being taken into account in determining each municipality's CRF entitlement. . For cost-shared and provincially administered programs, LSR costs for CRF entitlement purposes were frozen at the year 2000 amounts, rather than being set at the expected actual levels for 2001. Unlike past years, with the exception of the Land Ambulance program, there will be no year-end reconciliation and additional payments to reflect actual LSR costs exceeding those expected. · The CRF allocation formula takes into account only those LSR costs that remained after the deduction of approximately $500 million annually to reflect a provincially-imposed savings target. That target is a percentage of total municipal spending. The imposed savings target varies by size of municipality and the Ministry has little empirical or analytical support for this approach. Furthermore, since $1.3 billion in LSR programs is still administered by the province, the savings target presents municipalities with the challenge of finding savings in programs they do not control. . Because of the intricacies of the CRF funding formula, the savings target has had no effect in some municipalities. Such municipalities experienced annual windfall gains from the LSR initiative without having to find any local savings, while other municipalities experienced a significant, negative fiscal impact. . The Ministry did not update the residential education tax-room component of the CRF payment formula to reflect recent changes in assessment data, including changes in the latest province-wide current value assessment (CVA). Property assessments increased by an average of 14% above those used for CRF purposes. Updating the tax room component to reflect these changes would have increased the CRF entitlement of some municipalities and decreased the entitlement of others." The Auditor made a single recommendation to deal with the above concerns: "With respect to program administration, we concluded that overall system controls and procedures were adequate to ensure that CRF payments were properly authorized and processed. However, we did note areas where procedures could be strengthened. Specifically, we recommended that the Ministry: · Improve its monitoring and follow-up efforts with municipalities to ensure that CRF funds are used by municipalities as directed; · Implement procedures to recover or minimize CFF overpayments, which have amounted to $98 million over the three-year period from 1998 to 2000; and · Improve the timeliness of providing CRF information to municipalities to enable municipalities to better estimate their budgetary requirements and report on their fiscal results." To obtain a complete copy of the Auditor's Report go to: www.qov.on.calooafenQlishfenclish.htm. Page 20f2 11 2 Deputy Premier, and Minister of Finance The Hon. James M. Flaherty ~ - Ontario Vice-premier ministre et ministre des Finances L'hon. James M. Flaherty 7 Queen's Park Crescent Toronto ON M7 A 1Y7 Telephone: 416325-0400 Facsi~iJe: 416 325-0374 7, Queen's Park Crescent Toronto ON M7 A 1Y7 Téléphone: 416 325-0400 Télécopieur: 416325ø0374 DEC 19 2001 DEC 20m Mr. Mark G. McDonald Chief Administrative Officer County of Elgin 450 Sunset Drive St. Thomas ON N5R 5Vl Dear Mr. McDonald: Thank you for your letter dated May 30, 2001, regarding the proposed Public Sector Accountability Act, 2001 (the Act). Mr. Steve Peters, MPP, Elgin-Middlesex-London, also wrote to me on your behalf on June 18, 2001. This government believes that accountability is required, not just of Ontario's Government, but of all governments. We are determined to make government more open and accountable to the public because taxpayers deserve to know exactly how their money is being spent. At this point in time, the proposed legislation would apply to municipalities. Many municipalities are already meeting the requirements of the proposed Act. It is not our intention to create redundant administrative requirements or to compromise the working relationships between ministries and their broader public-sector partners. In this regard, Ministry of Finance staff are currently consulting with other ministries and outside organizations. Thank you again for writing. m~ . Flaherty c: Mr. Steve Peters, MPP Elgin-Middlesex -London 1 13 , 300 DuffeñnAvenue P.O. Box 5035 London, ON N6A4L9 DEC .:::: f" ?1JG1 London CANADA November 20, 2001 Tony Dagnone, President & CEO London Health Sciences Centre P.O. Box 5010 London ON N6A 4G5 The Honourable Tony Clement Minister of Health and Long Term Care Hepburn Block, 10th Floor 80 Grosvenor Street Toronto ON M7A 2C4 I hereby certify that the Municipal Council, at its session held on November 19, 2001 resolved: 15. That the following actions BE TAKEN: (a) the London Health Sciences Centre BE REQUESTED to hold a Health Care Forum so that all stakeholders across the entire catchment area (including hospital administration, community groups, parent groups, patients and City Administrations) forthe London Health Sciences Centre and the St. Joseph's Health Care Centre can discuss the provision of health care to the area residents and future health needs and services; (b) the Federal and Provincial Governments BE. ENCOURAGED to co!laborate on health care funding and they both BE ENCOURAGED to provide the local health care providers with the necessary financial support to meet the health care needs of the area; and (c) the Minister of Health and Long Term Care BE ENCOURAGED to appoint at least one representative of the Southwestern Ontario Pediatric Parents Organization to the Minister's new advisory committee on specialized pediatric services; it being pointed out that the Civic Administration, on behalf of the Municipal Council, has already asked the Minister to permit the City of London to be a delegation at a future advisory committee meeting. (15/31/BC) (AS AMENDED) /1. 1J. -1J Nt! .MAW'-- G. H. Hallman City Clerk /crg c. Sue Barnes, M.P. Joe Fontana, M.P. Pat O'Brien, M.P. Gar Knutson, M.P. The Honourable Dianne Cunningham, Minister of Training, Colleges & Universities Bob Wood, M.P.P. Frank Mazzilli, M.P.P. Steve Peters, M.P.P. V'Area Municipalities / The Corporation of the City of London Office: 519.661.6400 Fax: 519.661.4892 council&committees@city.london.on.ca www.city.!ondon.on.ca .... < i/4 Minister of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs lei Ministre de I'Agriculture, de I'Alimentation et des Affaires rurales Ontario Queen's Park, Ontario M5S 1 B3 Dec 19, 2001 DEC 24 2001 Mrs. Sandra J. Hefften Deputy Clerk County of Elgin 450 Sunset Drive St. Thomas, Ontario N5R 5V1 Dear Mrs. Heffi'en: Mr. Steve Peters, MPP for Elgin-Middlesex-London, has forwarded the resolution adopted by the County of Elgin about the Ontario Small Town and Rural COSTAR) Development Infrastructure initiative. As stated in a November 1, 2001 letter sent to heads of municipal councils applying under OST AR, Ontario will provide a one-third contribution toward the eligible costs of all successful applications under OST AR Round 1. This commitment emphasizes the health and safety of Ontario's communities as one of the provincial government's top priorities. The federal government has indicated that it will match the province's contribution for projects approved under the Canada Ontario Infrastructure program, and we expect to announce approved projects in the near future. In addition, under Option 1 of the OST AR Infrastructure initiative, the province will provide a commitment of two-thirds of the eligible costs, the entire senior government share, towards the mandatory engineering study. Should you have any questions regarding the status of your application, please do not hesitate to contact the OST AR Secretariat at 1-866-306-7827. .../2 , 11 5 -2- Thank you for sharing your views on this important initiative, and I trust the province's recent announcement regarding funding rates has resolved your concerns. Sincerely, c: The Honourable Chris Hodgson Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing Mr. Steve Peters, MPP Elgin-Middlesex- London 11 6 ,- -c 0" ^, ~nOi Dt ,''^'", December 20,2001 S. J. Heffren Deputy Clerk County of Elgin 450 Sunset Drive SI. Thomas, ON N5R 5V1 Dear Mrs. Heffren: Re: Rail Renewal Task Force Thank you for your resolution regarding the creation of a Rail Renewal Task Force. AMO forwarded your concerns to the Minister of Transportation for his comments. On November 29, 2001, we received a letter from Mr. Jim Whitestone, Director of the Transportation Policy Branch, Ministry ofTransportation, regarding the establishment of the Task Force. According to Mr. Whitestone, the government does not feel it is necessary to create a Task Force in view ofthe recent funding commitments to transportation. Attached is a copy of that letter to provide you with the details of this decision. AMO will continue to promote the concept notwithstanding this response. Pat Vanini Director of Policy and Government Relations Attachment AMOR"'01ma 11 7 393 Uriiversity Ave., Suite 1701 Toronto, ON M5G 1E6 tel: (416) 971-9856 · toll free: 1-877-426-6527 . fax: (416) 971-6191 . email: amo@amo.municom.com , Ministry of Transportation Ministère des Transports ® Ontario Transportation Policy Branch 3'd Floor, Bldg 'c" 1201 Wilson Avenue Downsview, ON M3M U8 , "~!nv7~íQJ MfW 2. 9 2001 November 13,2001 _n_~.__________ Pat Vanini Director of Policy and Government Relations Association of Municipalities of Ontario 393 University Avenue, Suite 1701 Toronto, Ontario M5G lE6 Dear Pat Vanini: Thank you for providing the Honourable Brad Clark, Minister of Transportation with a copy of your letter to the County of Elgin and the Township of South Stormont, regarding the establishment of a Rail Renewal Task Force. I have been asked to respond on his behalf. In the response to your previous letter about a Rail Renewal Task Force, the minister noted your comments about financial assistance from the province for municipal rail proj ects. Since the time of that letter, the originally announced budget of $250 million for the Golden Horseshoe Transit Investment Partnerships (GTlP) Fund has been increased by up to $1 billion. On September 27,2001 the Premier announced that the province is taking responsibility for GO Transit operating and base capital funding. The decision was based on recognition of the need to ensure a seamless transit system in the GTA and Golden Horseshoe. GO Transit is a vital part of this system. This new funding commitment builds on the almost $3.2 billion in transit funding provided by the province since 1995 and existing SuperBuild cornmitments. The major new commitments that provide support for rail and related infrastructure, together with the other range of activiÚes conducted by this government, described in the minister's letter, will provide ongoing renewal of the province's transportation network. . Therefore, in view of everything outlined above, the government does not consider it necessary to create a Rail Renewal Task Force. Thank you again for writing. YOr:Sin~ ~Whitestone Director http://www.mto.gov.on.ca . 11 S Made from recovered materials Fait de ma!érlaux recyc!és Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care Ministère de la Santé et des Soins de longue durée ® Ontario Assistant Deputy Minister Long-Term Care Redevelopment Project 415 Yonge Street, 10th Floor Toronto, ON M5B 2E7 Sous-ministre adjointe Projet de réaménagement des soins de longue durée 415, rue Yonge, 10eétage Toronto ON M5B 2E7 DEC 21 20m Telephone; Toll free; Fax; 416-326-6485 1-877-767-8889 416-326-5533 T éléphone; Sans frais: Télécopieur: 416- 326-6485 1-877-767-8889 416-326-5533 December 17, 2001 Mark G. McDonald Chief Administrative Officer The County of Elgin 450 Sunset Drive St. Thomas, ON N5R 5Vl Dear Mr. McDonald: As you may be aware, the Government of Ontario has recently reaffirmed its position on the current role municipalities play in long-term care, and has decided not to alter the existing statutory requirement for municipalities to operate a home for the aged. The attaéhed letter ftom Health and Long-Term Care Minister Tony Clement to the President of the Association of Municipalities of Ontario clarifies in greater detail the government's decision in this matter. I believe this reaffirmation of the government's direction with respect to municipal participation in the delivery ofIong-term care facility services will help expedite planning for municipal long-term care facility redevelopment. We intend to work closely with all municipal operators and their associations in supporting their redevelopment efforts. If you have any questions, please call the Long,Term Care Redevelopment Project of the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care at (416) 326-6485 or toll ftee at 1-877-767-8889. Sincerely, ~ Gail Paech Assistant Deputy Minister Long-Term Care Redevelopment Project ~ 119 7198-93 (99/06)* 7530-4601 Ministry of Health and Long-Term Csre Mlnlstère de la Senté et des Solns de longue durée ~ O"ta,1O Office of the Minister Bureau du ministre 101h Floor. Hepburn Block 80 Grosvenor Street Toronto ON M7A 2C4 Tel (416) 327-4300 Fax (416) 326-1571 10e élege, édifice Hepburn 80. rue Grosvenor Toronto ON M7A 2C4 Tét (416) 327-4300 Téléc (416) 326-1571 'NININ"gov"on"ca/hea!th VN/IN. gOY ,on"ca/heaJth December 14, 2001 Ms. Ann Mulvale President Association of Municipalities of Ontario 393 University Avenue, Suite 1701 Toronto ON M5G I E6 ., Dear Ms. Mu}vale:¡ V~ / As you may know, on October 18, Municipal Affairs and Housing Minister Chris Hodgson introduced a new Municipal Act. [fpassed by the Legislature, this act will become the cornerstone of a bctter, more constructive relationship between the province and municipalities. [ know there has been some interest in our government's current requirement for municipalities to operate homes for the aged. [ want to assure you our government believes municipalities have long played a vital role in Ontario's long-term care. They are a valuable provider of services, particularly in harder-to-serve areas of the province. Iknow you share our government's commitment to ensuring the people of Ontario have access to high quality long-term care as close to home as possible. As you know, there has been discussion over the past decade about the continuing role of municipalities in the operation of homes for the aged, and in particular, the obligation for a municipality to operate a home for the aged. With the growing needs of our elderly and the continuing contribution that municipalities make to their communities in this area, we will not be altering the existing statutory requirement for municipalities to operate a home for the aged. I want you to know this important and continuing role for municipalities will be supported by our unprecedented $1.2 billion investment in long- term care in your communities and the redevelopment of up to 16,000.long-term care beds. ~ 120 /2 1671-0J (99/06) 7530-4658 -2- Ms. Ann Mulvale We intend to work closely with all municipal operators of homes for the aged and with their associations, to find viable solutions to meeting the long-tenn care needs of the people of Ontario. This effort will includc learning from municipalities who have had positive experience working with their community partners and the private sector in discharging the obligation to operate a homc for the aged. [fyou have any questions, please call the Long-Term Care Redevelopment Project of the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care at (416) 326-6485 or toll free at 1-877-767-8889. / A / /} /(!/~ / / ///)': / / ·/:)'l_ l þ~~rJ ! / / Tony Clement Minister Yours very truly, I ; C. Donna Rubin, Chief Executive Officer Ontario Association of Non-Profit Homes and Services for Seniors (OANHSS) Karen Sullivan, Executive Director Ontario Long-Term Care Association (OL TCA) "l21 2782-01199/061 7530~4588 Office of the Minister Bureau du ministre lij ..-.. Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care Ministère de la Santé et des Soins de longue durée 10th Floor, Hepburn Block 80 Grosvenor Street Toronto ON M7A 2C4 Tel (416)327-4300 Fax (416) 326-1571 www.gov.on.ca/health 10e étage, édifice Hepburn 80, rue Grosvenor Toronto ON M7A 2C4 Tél (416) 327-4300 Téléc (416) 326-1571 www.gov.on.calhealth ¡lh1-\fI Mr. Mark G. McDonald Administrator/Clerk County of Elgin 450 Sunset Drive 81. Thomas ON N5R 5Vl DEC 19 2001 Dear Mr. McDonald: Steve Peters, MPP, Elgin-Middlesex-London, has forwarded your letter in response to a Brant County resolution to standardize a cost for cross-boarder Municipal services. I appreciate receiving the views of the Corporation of the County of Elgin on this matter. Before municipalities assumed the responsibility for land ambulance services, the Association of Municipalities of Ontario and the ministry established a joint committee, the Land Ambulance Implementation Steering Committee (LAISe) to work together on outstanding issues related to the transfer of ambulance services. Although the transfer is now complete, LAISC continues to work with the ministry on issues of concern to municipalities. We will continue to work with LAISC and its municipal and health care partners to resolve outstanding transition issues. The ministry is taking the necessary action to ensure Ontario residents receive, and continue to receive, ambulance services that meet established government standards and the needs and requirements of patients and public safety I trust this infonnation is helpful. c: Steve Peters, MPP " 122 1671-01 (01/04) 201-12683 753G-4658 Please circulate to: Clayton Watters; Mark G. McDonald TO: OGRA Members sUP FROM: Frank Hull, Manager of Technical Services and Standards DATE: December 17, 2001 Federal Government moves to designate inorganic chloride road salts as CEPA toxic The Assessment Report on road salts carried out by Environment Canada, has recommended road salts that contain inorganic chloride salts (with or without ferrocyanide salts) should be added to Schedule 1 (List of Toxic Substances) of the Canadian Environmental Protection Act 1999 (CEPA 1999). However, Environment Canada is neither proposing a ban on the use of road salts nor a course of action that compromises road safety. During the 60-day consultation period, beginning Dec. 1, the Ontario Good Roads Association will be will be taking an active role. OGRA will provide comment to the Federal Government that municipalities are cognizant of the impact of salt on the environ- ment; and that municipalities support the responsible use of road salt to ensure road safety, and the safety of the motoring public during winter months. Under CEPA1999, Environment Canada has two years to develop and propose management measures to reduce the impacts of road salts on the environment. These control measures will be selected and developed with input from provinces and territories, municipalities, and stakeholders such as other transportation and road maintenance authorities, Industry and environmental groups. A full range of management options includes: reducing losses at salt storage sites, improved salt application technology and practices, meteorological forecasting tools that could lead to reduced salt use, and the use of alternate products. Although not toxic to humans, the assessment found that because of the high releases of chlorides around storage of salts and snow disposal sites-and run-off and splash from roadways into soils, streams and rivers-road salts pose a serious thraat to the aquatic environment, ground water, plants and animals. For further information regarding road salt, the assessment process and the Assessment Report visit Environment Canada's web site: iYWW,[ì,Ç,gç,Qi.. On the national scene, a Road Salt Working Group representing national, provincial and municipal road authorities has been formed. The Working Group has developed a model Communications Plan and a framework for developing a Road Salt Management Plan to provide assistance to road authoritiss. These documents can be found on the Transportation Association of Canada's (TAC) Web site: www.tac-atc.ca/roausalt/roausalt.hlm. An Ontario Municipal Working Group on Road Salt is also being formed and OGRA will be participating. The inaugural meeting is tentatively scheduled for mid December 2001. Input from municipal and corporate OGRA members is welcome. OGRA will continue to communicate regularly to our member- ship on this important issue. Contacts at the OGRA offices are: Diana Summers, OGRA, Manager of Policy and Research: diana(aJoara.o'9 Frank Hull, OGRA, Manager of Technical Services: frª-IJ.~IéiJQgG1"1[g 123 ONTARIO GOOD ROADS ASSOCIATION ·A;!.':'~L.ji:i 530 Otto Road, Unit #2 Mississauga, ON Tel: (905) 795-2555 Fax: (905) 795-2660 Email: info@ogra.org Chndren's .safety ViUage Mailing Address: P.O. Box 24039 London, Ontario, N6H 5C6 of London Area Located in: Fanshawe Conservation Area 1424 Clarke Road, London, Ontario December 21,2001 Council of the Corporation of the County of Elgin 450 Sunset Drive St. Thomas, Ontario N5R 5V1 ,IMI 2 2002 Attention: Linda Veger. Treasurer Re: Grantof$5000 to Children's Safety Village of the London Area. 2001 Dear Ms. Veger, On behalf of the Board of Directors I would like to thank the Council of the Corporation of the County of Elgin for the grant of $5000 the funds have been put towards the cost of getting the Village operating. Our first class was held on April 17, followed by the official opening on May 4 and full operation commencing in September 2001. As of December 14, 2001 over 8000 children have gone through our programs. We are presently examining the addition of programs such as fann safety, Internet safety training and preschool (aged 3-5) fire prevention. Included with this thank you letter is a copy of our latest book and a list of the schools that have visited us ITom the County of Elgin to date. Please note, the Council of the Corporation of the County of Elgin will be recognized on our "Recognition Board" at the Safety Village. Sincerest appreciation, ~/5 /' "i'".... - W. H. Brock Acting Executive Director 124 Tel: (519) 455-5437 Fax: (519) 455-7102 Toll Free: 1 (866) 455-5437 Website: www.safetyvillage.ca E-mail: info@safetyvillage.ca Business No. 89764 0538 RROOI 121zal2BB1 13:17 5197651943 EA5T ELGIN SEe SCH PAGE ..... . DEe. 19,2001 E.E.S.S. 362 TALBOT ST. W. AYLMER, ONT. N5H lK6 SAFETY VILLAGE STAFF: THANK YOU FOR LETTING US COME TO YOUR VILLAGE. WE HAD FUN AND LEARNED ALOT. YOU WERE ALL VERY KIND AND HELPFUL. WE REALLY THOUGHT THE VILLAGE AND SMOKE ROOM WAS COOL. E.E.S.S. DEVELOPMENTAL CLASS JESSICA LIBERTY . 125 12f2Ðf2BÐ1 13:1& 5197&51943 EAST ELGIN SEC SCH PAGE B1fÐ1 ~ Chí/dren's Safety Village of London Area - .It Fire & Police Education Follow-up Questionnaire Thank you for taking the time to complete this questionnoire! Your input is ¡.ery important to us. Please return within 3 weeks to: Chi Idren's Safety Village of London Area Fox to: 455-7102 or mail: P.O. Box 24039. London, ON, N6H 5C6 Grade: lac IJrf~1U. L<.k~ IYiU4 04te of Visit: ~, ;i, 01 School: E ~ ðf;~ 4on..cla.'(j Teacher: p~ ¡>LZ/V~J.L 1. Did our presentation motivate any further discussion on Safety? Yes ;/ No 2. In your opinion, did the children understand the information given during the presenta1ion? ~ Yes ~ tùd No 3. In your opinion, will the children be able to communicate the informotion to their families? Yes.tJó'JtJu. ,tvti/.. No 4. Did the Cldult volunteers who were with your class benefit from our presentation? Yes v No 5. Do you have any suggestions or comments about how we could improve our program? Û4t;: _«~~ieÓM~~ ";::;é}.:);t~L;¡' L/ .J.¡'; fA -;;/1 < It. ~ ø.-4 L/ -4l" ./- ../ ~ ' . '. t4.ßj;t ~:L ~7Jv:;1rÆ, 1þ,r~ ~/0?<1~~~ 126 and Grade One Classes That Grade Four the Children's Safety Village Have Visited the County of Elgin. 2001 from Updated December 19,2001 Phone Address Name of School Date of Attendance # of Kids Teacher Fax Grode Four (April through June) May 8 AM May 8 PM May 18 PM June 25 AM 40 26 25 57 Barbara Granger Linda Chapman Christine Cook 452-8159 631-1382 631-1006 773-3115 452-8150 631-5020 631-4930 773-3117 840 Hami Iton Rd., London, ON, N5Z 1 V5 50 Scott Street, St. Thomas, ON, N5P 1K6 20 Balaclaya St., St. Thomas, ON, N5P 3C2 48 Smith Street, E Aylmer, ON N5H 1P6 Ealmg Scott Street Balaclaya Assumption Tina Berry Grode One (September through December) Oct 11 AM Oct 25 PM Oct 29 PM Noy 2 PM Dec 6 PM Dec 18 PM 41 25 64 44 18 9 Anna Bailey Michelle Jackson Anne McLaughlin Linda Bowden Jane Berardini Phoebe Parish 631-3010 631-4375 631-5625 773-5708 633-8097 765-1943 631-1022 631-4940 631-5997 773-5185 631-3770 773-3174 10 South Edgeware Rd., St. Thomas, ON, N5P 2H2 43 Myrtle Street, St. Thomas, ON, N5R 2E6 3926 Fingal Line, RR#l 9473 Belmont Road.. St. Monsignor Morrison Myrtle Street Southwold New Sarum ON, class what we teach gr. One West, Aylmer. ON, N5H 1K6 Thomas, Taught highschoo 362 Talbot St. * Arthur Voden ** East Elgin Secondary 349 10 Schools from Elgin County have attended the Village 349 Students from Elgin County have attended the Village ., * Instruction to Secondary school students who in turn were teaching children ** Special needs students put through appropriate pragram ~ N '! Children's ,safety Vi\\age of London Area 1111 ! ,.- "I ~I II! ¡ .. ! "I I~" .1 I ~, ¡ .1 ~ 1""* Fall of 2001 Room 331 Main Legislative Building Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1A4 lei ~ Ontario Constituency Office: 542 Talbot Street St. Thomas, Ontario N5P 1 C4 Tel: (416)325"7250 Fax: (416)325-7262 Email: steve_peters-mpp @ontla.ola.org STEVE PETERS, M.P.P. ELGIN - MIDDLESEX - LONDON Tel: (519) 631-0666 Fax: (519) 631-9478 'ToIIFr,ee: 1-800-265-7638 E-mail: steveyeters-mpp-co @ontla.ola.org J.l\ N 2 20Q? December 27,2001 Honourable Tony Clement Minister of Health and Long-Tenn Care 10th Floor, Hepburn Block 80 Grosvenor Street Toronto, ON M7 A 2C4 Dear Minister: Please find enclosed this resolution from the County of Elgin calling on your Government to ensure that Ontarians return to their fonner health services system. I feel strongly that you will find within this attached document several issues that require the immediate attention of your Ministry. Minister, the County has explored a variety of aspects of the Province's health care system in a careful and logical fashion. The conclusions and recommendations are based on serious and valid concerns expressed by residents throughout Ontario. I would appreciate your reviewing the material, responding to County of Elgin officials and forwarding a copy of your letter to my office. Thanking you in advance for your time and consideration. Sincerely, ~~ Steve Peters, M.P.P. Elgin-Middlesex -London Cc: County of Elgin 128 Room 331 Main Legislative Building Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1A4 lei ~ Ontario Constituency Office: 542 Talbot Street SI. Thomas, Ontario N5P 1C4 Tel: (416)325-7250 Fax: (416)325-7262 Email: steve_peters-mpp @ontla.ola.org STEVE PETERS, M.P.P. ELGIN - MIDDLESEX - LONDON Tel: (519) 631-0666 Fax: (519) 631-9478 Toll Free: 1-800-265-7638 E-mail: steve_peters-mpp-co @ontla.ola.org December 27,2001 ,)~!\! 2 ?0n? Honourable Allan Rock Minister of Health Room 44 I -S, Centre Block House of Commons Ottawa, ON. KlA OA6 Dear Minister: Please find enclosed this resolution from the County of Elgin calling on your Government to ensure that Ontarians,retum to their fonner health services system. I feel strongly that you will find within this attached document several issues that require the immediate attention of your Ministry. Minister, the County has explored a variety of aspects of the Province's health care system in a careful and logical fashion. The conclusions and recommendations are based on serious and valid concerns expressed by residents throughout Ontario. I would appreciate your reviewing the material, responding to County of Elgin officials and forwarding a copy of your letter to my office. Thanking you in advance for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Steve Peters, M.P.P. Elgin- Middlesex-London Cc: County of Elgin Î 29 , Room 331 Main Legislative Building Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1A4 1iÆ ~ Ontario Constituency Office: 542 Talbot Street SI. Thomas, Ontario N5P 1 C4 Tel: (416)325-7250 Fax: (416)325-7262 Email: steve_peters-mpp @ontla.ola.org STEVE PETERS, M.P.P. ELGIN - MIDDLESEX - LONDON Tel: (519) 631-0666 Fax: (519) 631-9478 Toll Free: 1-800-265-7638 E-mail: steveJ)eters-mpp-co @ontla.ola.org J.l!N 'ë 2r09 January 04, 2002 Honourable Chris Hodgson Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing l7'h Floor, 777 Bay Street Toronto, ON M5G 2E5 Dear Minister: Please find enclosed this resolution from the County of Elgin calling on your Government to amend Bill 8 - Safe Streets Act and to continue to allow the Canadian Fire Fighters to conduct fundraising campaigns supported by the general public. Minister, as you well aware this was and remains an issue of great concern to myself and my colleagues in the Provincial Liberal Party. On April 30, 2001 Liberal Essex M.P.P. Bruce Crozier's Bill 26 - Charity Fund-raising Activities Act 2001 - received first reading. Despite its worthy goal- to "recognize the fund-raising activities ofIegitirnate charities" -the Bill was lost on Second Reading, November 29, 2001. Minister, 1 urge you to carefully review this resolution, respond in the affirmative to Elgin County officials and forward a copy of your letter to my office. Thanking you in advance for your time and consideration. Sincerely, ~~ Steve Peters, M.P.P. Elgin-Middlesex-London Cc: The County of Elgin 130 Room 331 Main Legislative Building Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A1A4 yj ~ , Ontario Constituency Office: 542 Talbot Street SI. Thomas, Ontario N5P 1 C4 Tel: (416)325-7250 Fax: (416) 325-7262 Email: steve_peters-mpp @ontla.ola.org STEVE PETERS, IVI.P.P. ELGiN- MIDDLESEX - LONDON Tel: (519) 631-0666 Fax: (519) 631-9478 Toll Free: 1-800-265-7638 E-mail: steve_peters-mpp-co @ontla.ola.org '.:<:;;~. ",. JAN 'C 200? January 02, 2002 Honourable Chris Hodgson Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing 18th Floor, 777 Bay Street Toronto, ON M5G 2E5 Dear Minister: Please find enclosed a resolution ITom Elgin County Council responding to the Provincial Consultation on Smart Growth Management Councils. I believe the correspondence merits consideration rrom your Ministry. Minister, Elgin Council officials have included an additional amendment to the original Town of Caledon resolution calling for your Government to work with all Councils in Ontario, not just those in Central Ontario, to develop a Provincial vision for Smart Growth. I would appreciate your reviewing the enclosed material, responding to Elgin County Warden John Wilson and forwarding a copy of your letter to my office. Thanking you in advance for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Sl ~k. Steve Peters, M.P.P. Elgin-Middlesex-London Cc: Elgin County Warden John Wilson . 1 31 Room 331 Main Legislative Building Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1A4 YÆ ~ Ontario Constituency Office: 542 Talbot Street St. Thomas, Ontario N5P 1 C4 Tel: (416)325-7250 Fax: (416)325-7262 Email: steve_peters-mpp @ontla.ola.org STEVE PETERS, M.P.P. ELGIN - MIDDLESEX - LONDON Tel: (519) 631-0666 Fax: (519) 631-9478 Toll Free: 1-800-265-7638 E-mail: steve_peters-mpp-co @ontla.ola.org .If,~ 4 200? January 03, 2002 Honourable Brad Clark Minister of Transportation 3'd Floor, Ferguson Block 77 Wellesley Street West Toronto, ON M7 A IZ8 Dear Minister: Please [md enclosed a letter from the Elgin County Council focusing on the continuing and yet- to-be resolved issue of emergency detours and deteriorating roads throughout Elgin County. While you have contacted county officials, there are clearly still a variety of issues that require further explanation and clarification. Minister, Elgin County officials are concerned about what they feel is a contradiction in your November 06, 200 I letter over the cause of increased traffic volume and road damage. In addition, they are reiterating their request that the Province fund 20 per cent of the total cost of " this premature reconstruction of the roadways caused by detours nom Highway 40 I. As there is ample evidence of county and municipal road deterioration throughout the county because of these detours, a resolution to this matter is urgently needed before the condition of these roadways worsens. Minister, I would urge you to re-visit the County's concerns, respond and forward a copy of your letter to my office. Thanking you in advance for your time and consideration, Sincerely, ~\k Steve Peters, M.P.P. Elgin-Middlesex-London Cc: Elgin County Warden John Wilson 132 12/11/81 23:18:53 EST; ASSOCIATION OF?-) 1 519 633 7661 CLERK-Elgin Co Page 882 DEC-11-01 rUE 05:53 PM 260 FAX NO. 416 971 6191 P. 01 / [~;r Association of Municipalities of Ontario ~ "~ ""f¡¡ I ,) ,,'", Jo: ,þ,:.y." , , f,~i"''"'JJI,'¡¡, "'~,,,' ., . ~;~ ~þ'" - - ~4~ AI fI~ 393 Univeuity Avenuo, Suite 1701 Toronto, ON M5'G 1 E6 .......-- 1. ,~~~.-. -~ ~ - " - Tel: (416) 971-9855· fox: (416) 971-5191 Arn::I.[[· ;:!.nmØ'J::¡mn mlln1r.nm r:r>m To tile immediate attention of the Clerk and Council Please ensure that copies of this are distribvted to aU Members of Council December 11, 2001 Alert - 01i0031 Federal Budget Makes Added Infrastructure Commitments "The municipal voice has been heard," said Ann Mu!vale, AMO President, "Our message of increased support forinfrastructureto help stimulate the economy, create jobs and renew our investment in our communities clearly resonated with the federal government". HighliglJts of tile Budget that affect municipalities: --t Strategic Investment Foundation with a minimum $2 billion available for large infrastructure projects as well as the retention of previous budget commitments including $600 million for highways. -+ Green Municipal Fund Program has been doubled to $250 million. -+ $680 million for affordabie housing previously announced. (AMOwill provide input on a Federal- Provincial Agreement for Ontario that is to be developed). ...:¡, National Roundt;,ble on Environmenlal and Economy to develop a National Srownfields Hcdevelopmont Stmtegy (the work AMO has done in Ontario willl)c of immense benefit). ...:¡, Extension of support forb road band Internet coverage, particularlyforrurai and rerl"lote areas, $40 million for 2003-04 and $35 million-a-year for the following three years. -+ An undefined commitment fortraining of emergency pcrsonnel who respond to different hazards. (AMO'swork with Ontario's Solicitor General on emergency readiness will be critical to positioning Ontélrio's needs). ...:¡, f~e-<Iffirrnaiion of the Federal commitment to developing a "new, integrated and financially sustainable agricultural policy". As a member of its Board, AMO extends Ontario municipal congratulations to FCM on its offorts on positioning community interests in this Federal blldget AMO wíll work with FCM to ensure thatthese infrastructure monies and other Federal commitments work for Ontario municipalities and that we see an effective stre¡:¡mlined process for these invGstments. 1)JÎs in("rm~lion is avaílÐblo Ihrouah AMO's subscription based MUNICOM network at www.munlcom.com. For mo.'c Informntion conf.ncl (416) 971-9856: Pat Vanini, Direcf.or of Policy and Government Relations at ext. 316 Tran<m!s"lon problems: 416-971-9856 1 34 12/11/81 23:19:42 EST: ASSOCIATIOn OF?-> 1 519 633 7661 CLERH-Elgin Co Page 883 DEC-II-0l TUE 05:54 PM 260 FAX NO, 416 971 6191 p, 02 / 1'0(' Association of Municipalities Df Ontario ,:';"'. I· .-;..;r.::.t, . '~'.~à!,~, ,,:'¡i'!"~'E~ . ;1}.f~/·W"~1 . ._~~'Jh~ ....~'1· ,. ___- ~"""'i'" ~:i1í ~~ 393 Untvers~i Avenue, Su~e 1701 TOlonto, ON MSQ 1EG ~~~~..,-- .-...--..- - - rBI: (416) 971·9856· fox: (416) 971·6191 Am:aij' r;\Inu1/Í9)A/"I'In munt,.nm r:nm To the immediate attention of the Clerk and Council Please ensure that copies of this are distributed to afl Members of Council December 11, 2001 Alert - 01/032 Municipalities Get A New Municipal Act Issue: Bill 111, New Municipal Act received Third Reading today and Royal Assent is expected tomorrow. Status: Nler a numboroffalse starts and delays, municipal governments in Ontario will operate under new legislation. AMO appreciates thewol'k ofMínistor Hodgson and his Parliamentary Assistant Morley Kells 10 get this Act through the legislature. A numbcr of amendments were made to the Bill in rcsponse to AMO's submission. Of note Is a new provision that requires a review of the legislation In 200'1 and eV0ryfive (5) years. There is nothing in the legislation that would prevent changes outside of tho m¡mdntory review periods. During Third ReÐding debate, manyoftho speakers on each side of the House recognized the need for <:\ now legislative framework. Whether or not the Sill goes far enougll was the essence of the debate.. Whìlo the legislation remains somewhatprescriplìve, It does extend natural person powers, supports pre-consultation, rccognizes municipal governmont and provides several new managoment and financiQI tools A numberoftllcSC require regulation for implementation and AMO has been assured thalmunicipal input will be sought in their drafting. In torms oHhe pre-consultation provision, AMO is workillg on a Memorandum of Understanding with tile Province:¡ and is hopeful that it will be finalized shortly. We will also be looking at the preparation of other matorials and training and information sessions, however priority work will be the regulations. Theøovernmontwill be coming forward with a companion Bill that will deal with some housekeeping cll<1nges. This offers additional time to review commonts ;:md the Bill to ensure clarity and effective operations. AMO f1ppreciates Ihesupportofits members in helping gettothis stage. Theworkofmany municipal offici81$ has made a significant difference in the formation of this Bill. 135 Thi$ information is availablo through AMO's subscription based MUNfCOM network at www.municom.com. For mora InfoTiYlation contact (416) 971-9856: Pat Vaninl. Director of Policy and GDvernment Relations at exL 3113 12/12/B1 23:B8:49 EST; ASSOCIATION OF?-> 1 519 &33 7&&1 CLERK-Elgin Co Page BB2 DEC-12-01 WED 06:11 PM 260 FAX NO, 416 971 6191 p, 01/02 / r¥ r' Association of , ',', \. ' Municipalities 't-r of Ontario (,6/ /~!t ,~1;n<:11I .¡J¡,f.;"~ "'11- - Ie: rt 393 UnlversJty Avenue, Suite 1701 Toronto, ON MSG 1Eß Tel: (416) 971-9856· fax: (416) 971-6191 ¡:omRIt' Arnnt1hÞrm n'11U\ir.nmr.r'U'T'i To the Immediate attention of tile Clerk and Council PJeJise ensure tfJat copies of t/Jis are distributed to all Members of Council December 12, 2001 - Alert· 01/033 New Legislation Mandating Move to Full Cost Recovery for Water and Sewer Issue: Minister Hodgson introduced the Sustainr,bJe Water and Wasto Water Services Act today, which could result in steep rate increases for u~ers in many municipalities. Background: Today, the MinistorofMunicipalArrairsand Housing inlroduced enabling legislalìonthat, if passed will require that municipalities calculate the full cost of their waler and sow:;¡ge senlÌces, and develop and implement a plmlto recover the full cost. Although it is highly Imlil<ely that the 8111 will become law before the House rises tomorrow, lh() Government is sending a clear message that it will move ahead with mandatory full cost recovGry. Tho Bill outlines a series of steps that each water and sewage works must undertake. The following are some of tho highligtlls: First, each 'regulated entity' must submit a report to the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing for approval. A 'regulated entity' is broadly defined and not necessarily limited to municipalities, however. regulations could narrow !tIe application. The report is to provide a detailed accounting of the full cost of delivcring water and sewage services to the public. Full cost will include operational costs, financial costs, renewal and rcplaccment costs, improvements associated with extracting, treating or distributing water to the public, and any other costs outlined in regulation. Second, eael, 'regulated entity' must submit a plan lor approval on how it intends to recover the full cost of each service, again to the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing. The contents of the plan are subject to regulation and the Ministerwould be iJuthorizcd to cap water and sewage rates. Regulations under the Act may also imposo other limits on what sources of revenue can be included in the cost recovery plan. Third, c<Jch 'regulated entity' must implement its approved full cost recovery pian by a specified date est"bllshed in regulation and the Minister has the ability to order this if no action is taken. The legislation also requires that every 'rC!gulated entity' must establish a dedicated reserve accounllhat segregates funds forwatcr and sewage serviceslrom general revenues. Some of [he reviews and approvals under the legislation may bo dclc£jated by the Minister to a third body. The legislation provides no timelines for these roquircmentsand all details will be outlined in regulations to follow. The Minister will be using the legislation as 1M basis of a consult¡::¡lion process, however the details of 1his arc not yet available. While the Minister is committed to working with the sector, there are other m<Jtters tl,at affect the cost of water that need to be reviewed, including tile testing and treatment regime! und",r Regulation 459 and tho usa of new technologies_ 136 ../2 12/12/Bl 23:B9:42 EST; ASSOCIATION OF?-) 1 519 633 7661 CLERH-Elgin Co Page BB3 DEC-12-0! WED 06:11 PM 260 FAX NO, 416 871 6181 p, 02/02 Now Legislation Mendoting Move to full Cost Recovery for Water and SewGr - P. 2 Meml)or Cnmmunication - Aiert: AMO's Reaction: In Juno of 2000, AMO issued its Action Plan for Waler and called on the government to work with us to preparo a comprehcnsive pl,m. It is unclear how this free-standing pieceoflegislalion relates to other parts of the water and wasler water delivery system and it may create unnecessary anxiety amongst municip:Jlities, and water llsers. AMO has said that a move to full cost recovery makes sense in principle, particularly in the absence of any sustainable and predictable funding program forinfrDstructure, AMO's work donefor the Walkerton Inquiry clearly demonstrates [bat municipalities have done a good job in the delivery of safe drinking water notwithst~nding that over the last 10 years, the Province has made significant changes to water policy and plogmms. Tllere are a numberofveryvalid reasons as to why the investment in municipal water and sewer systems have not kept up with improvement and replacement nceds, including the role that periodic and short tcrm funding programs played. In ¡¡ddllion, the regul¡¡loryregime has changod several times. Most recently, municipalities have beon faced with the cost impacts of Regulation 459. As a result, more municipalities are working toward full cost recovory. However, as ùxperience dict,Jlcs, thoro will be transition impacts and where a municipality experiences this, ß transition plan is put in place lh.<¡t meets local needs and circumstances. Moving to a provincially m,mdatcd water and waste wator accounting, planning and reporting system will have a lot of consnquences, particularly since regulations by their nature tend to be prescriptive ¡¡nd uniform. In the absence of good rcsearch and information, and thorough analysis, there could be some significant consequences as a rcsult of this BilL For example, some municipalities have small systems and few ~10usetlolds on eiJch system, so they will be faced with high per household costs. Without greater clarity on [hI;) Government's plan to address prohibitively high water and sewage rates, it is unclear if and how residents can absorb these costs. Our own reseiJrch SllOWS that there will be significant impacts on water conSLlmers and that a mitigation stmtegywill be needcd. We urge the Minister to do the necessarywork, test assumptions, develop options, be thorough and transparent, and let us work together to develop arpropriate responses in lho interest of good public water and waste water policy. AMO is surprised thallhe Governmcnt has chosen to introduce this Bill so late in the legisla1ive session and in ,Idvance or its own SuperBuild infrastructure studies that are geared to identifying the extent of the infrnstructure problem and the impacts/options for a long term waterfinancing strategy. We need the benefit of this work and urge the Ministerto share that with us and to utilize it in the work ahead. We are similarly concerned tllat this Bill is in advance of the O'Connor Inquiry Reports and follows on a lot of speculation about the rc-orgrmization of water delivery in OntiJrlo.. We understand that SuperBuild is looking at the circumstances of other jurisdictions and their responses to financing waterandwasle water - including the role of privatization. This too must be put on the table if we are to develop an appropriate, welllhought out wCJter policy for Ontario's municipalities. If the leglslalion is passed in the next session, and if we see regulations by next summer, it is clear that municipalitios wlllllave a huge amount of work to do to prepare their accounting reports. AMO is urging the govcrnrnentto help fund this work through Superßuild. Municipal budgets for 2002 are being set and without the regulations intended to implement the Act, Ihere is no way 10 plan or budget for this work. AswclI, AMO again urges tile Provincc to rclease the funding commitments underOST AR One-water and sewer projects Hlat ¡¡rc noodcd for compliance willi the new regulated water quality standards. This is a priority Lind the announcemont or moving to a minimum 1/3 funding formula should expedite these commilrnonts. t\MO members were told in August lhat commitments would be made shor!ly and only a handful have been made. AMO will pursue these matters with the Minister ¡¡nd keep its members informed of any further drwclopmcnts. - 1 3 7 11Jis ¡n{"'lI/aU"" is vvailablG through AMOs subscription based MUNlCOM network at www.rnunÎcom.com. For more inform~tion contact (416) 971-9856: p<J( Vanini, Director of Policy <Jnd Government Relations at ox!. 316 or Nicola Crawhall, Sonior Policy Advisor at ex!. 329 12/19/81 23:14:48 EST; ASSOCIATIOn OF?-> 1 519 b33 7bb1 CLERK-Elgin Co Page 8H2 DEC-19-01 WED 05:35 PM 260 FAX NO, 416 971 6191 p, 01 . / r¥~ Association of Municipalities of Ontario - -- - 393 University Avonue, Suite! 17D1 Toronto, ON M5ß 1E6 Tel: (416) 971-9856' f..: (416) 971-6191 A/'I'Il\iI· ~I'N"I~~ITII"I mun1r:nrn room I e .Þ·t To the immediate att«ntion of the Clerk and Council December 19, 2001 - Alert· 011036 AMO and Province Sign Historic Agreement Issue: President Ann Mulvalo and Minister Chris Hodgson today signed an historic Memorandum of Und$rstanding 011 provincial-municipal con5ultation. "This Is a landmark for provincial-municipal relations in Ontario. Municipal governments and the provim:D serve OIlC taxpayer, We feel that today signals a new approach to framing legislation and regulatiMs affecting municipalities. AMO appreciates the leadership of Premier Harris and Minister Hodgson have exerted to make thi... Memorandum of Understanding a reality and we look forward to a productive future." (Ann Mu/vale, President, AMO) "T/lis Memorandum of Understanding is much more than a symbolic agreement. It is a key element in a new, more mature, more productive and cooperative relationship between municipalities and the province. We look forward to working with municipalities to provide the best service to Ontarians." (Minister CIllis Hodgson) Bi,\I.~kgmund: Among AMO's policy positions on the new Munic:iptll Act was the call for pre-consultation on matters that could have a significant financial impact on municipal budgets. The new Act, which received Royal Assent December 12, contains a provision that "The Province of Ontario endorses the principle of ongoing consultation between the Province and municipalities in relation to matters of mutual interest." (Section 3(1)) Thf;1 Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) signed today, sets out the principles and procedures that will dcliver this provision. The MOU's principles address commitment, respective areas of jurisdiction, the nature of i$SU~)S subject to prior consultation, responsibilities, information sharing and exclusions. In terms ofimplcrnentation, the Memorandum takes effect January 1,2002 and expires December 31,2004 and conL¡1ins a three-year rcnewal clause and a review clause.. Meetings will be held on a regular basis and can be called by either pmty. The scheduling of meet in os will be mutually agreed upon as will the agendas. To achieve the appropriate level of discussion, while being respectful of each other's propliety information and tl10 government's legislative/regulaloryprocess, the parties have agreed to confidentiality ofinformation. This reflocts the fairness, openness and good faith principles enunciated in the MOU. The MOll sets out that the Minister of Municipal Affairs and HOllsing will represent the Provinœ. The municipal sector will be rcprosented by AMO's President and Executive Committee along with the Chair of thE) lmge Urban Mayors' CatlctJs of Ontario, the Chair of tho Regional Chairs of Ontario and Single Tier Mayors and Chair of the Association of Francophonc Municipalities of Ontario. The MOU also provides that elLlier p¡¡rly con request the inclusion of other representatives. for example other Ministers and other municipal bodies. From AMO's perspective, we wHl want to continue \0 work closely with the various municipal staff Ðssociations as we proceed to imploment the MOU. Attacllcd pleasE> rind a copy of President Mulvale's statement at the signing. A copy of thl~ final draft MOll is available from AMO'swebsites along with pictures oftoday's historic event. Asigned version of the MOU will be available by Thursday morning. 1 3 8 For morC! inforffliJtion contact (416) 971-9856: Pal VDnini, Director of Policy and Government Relations at ext. 316 ___~M~'~_______ 12/19/Bl 23:15:46 EST; ASSOCIATION OF?-) 1 519 633 7661 CLERK-Elgin Co Page BB3 DEC-19-0! WED 05:36 PM 260 FAX NO. 416 971 6191 P. 02 Hcmsrks by: Ann Mulvale, President Association of Municipalities of Ontario December 19. 2001,2:30 p.m. Legislation Building, Queen's Park Signing of the:; Provincla/-AMO Memorandum of Understanding {Chec/< AgDinst Delivery) Good afternoon ladies and gentlemen. Ministcr _. it is a pleasure to be with you today and members of the AMO Board of Directors émd other guests to sign this Memorandum of Understanding. As you said, it is an historic d¡IY. It is u day that says we have a sharod interest in developing the best public policy that serves both the provincial and municipal orders of government. Last August, over 1500 municipal elected and staff officials gathered in this City to explore excellence in municipal government. Tho conference theme was "The Art of the Impossible." We wore hoping lhat the municipal sector would be told that a new Municipal Act could be a reality. We asked that municipal governmont be recognized as the mature. responsible and accountable order of government that it is. We asked that the provincial-municipal relationship be based on prior consultation - one that involves effective information sharing. Thc now Municipal Act is now in place and it recognizes municipalities as governments for the first time. And with [he signing of this Memorandum of Understanding, we are witnessing what happens when the parlies are committed to making a difference - when the "Art of the Impossible becomes the Possible." I wunt to thunk the Minister for his commitment and leadership. I also want to thank his staff whose stewardship of the issues h()lped get us to this moment. And to the AMO Beard, staff und our members - your support sustaincd us in our efforts. Our membership can be proud of this day and we will work with dedicatien to make this MOU effective for both parties. As much as this is Ðn important moment for Ontario's municipal governments. it is an even more momentous occasion for our constilucnls - the taxpayer, the voter - the person we all selvo. We must not lose sight of this. Ultimately we are all committed to and motivated by making our communities better placcs to live and work. Strong communities mean a strong Ontario, Governments am expected to work together. This Memorandum sets out ¡¡ process that facilitates how we do this. I believe that putting our energies into the development of policy will bo of greater service than putting our energies into reacting and amending legislation or fixing its unintended impacts. The Memorandum's benefit is clear - we wil! be consulted on ¡¡ny proposed change in legislation or regulations that impact the municipal budget year or budget planning cycle. We believo that [his will help our members develop their budgets willl greater assuredness. We believe that through open and good faith discussions thaI we can develop helpful solutions and bùild effeclive public policy. To Premier Mike Harris and the provincial Cabinet, you have taken a bold step with us today. This is an historic occasion and I am so very proud to share it with you. 139 ~---~~- 12/18/B1 23:29:52 EST; ASSOCIATION OF?-) 1 519 &33 7&&1 CLERK-Elgin Co Page BB2 DEC-18-01 TUE 07:25 PM 260 FAX NO, 416 971 6191 p, 01/06 / !¥(' Association of Municipalities of Ontario - I. ..: ~. r' "'1\1,.- '~~;; L 393 University Avenue, Suite 1701 Toronto, ON MSG 183 OM cvw" ~.~ Te~ (416) 971-9855· fax: (416) 971-6191 an'll'tj" A.,......tR1~mn mlln<t:.l'\m t"n", To the immediMe attention of tfle Clerk and Council Pfc¡¡se ensure that copies of this are distributed to ail Members of Council December 18, 2001 Alert - 01/034 Prorogation ofthe Second Session of the 37th Parliament Means ... Issue: So what happerled to Bill,.. Stii'llus: This Session was another busy one with 186 bills introduced, including a numberin the last two days. A motion was passed that authorized, notwithst£1nding the prorogation of the House, that all bills (Government, Private Members' and Private bills) are to be continued at the same stage of business for the l10xt Session. (See attached Status Sheet on Government Bills). So what does this mean for legislation affecting municipal government? Some key bills were passed and Iwve received Royal Assent, including: MlInicipnl Act, 2001- Royal Assent December 12. (see AMO Alert December 11) Two sections, 477 (council's ability to prohibit/regulate publiG nuisances and council opinion not subject to court review) and 485 (short title) came into force at time of Royal Assent. Oak Ridges Moraine Act, 2001 - Royal Assent December 14 . Ontarians witl) Disabilities Act, 2001- Royal Assent December 14. Two key amendments were made, onc that eliminates the population threshold for preparation of plans (all municipalities will have to do this) 8nd a $50,000 penalty for the lack of a plan. Rosponsible Choices for GroWtll and Fiscal/~esponsibllity Act, 2001- Royal Assent December 5. This bill repatriates GO Transit among other budget aspects. Of particular disappointment to the municipal sector was the lack of unanimous Gonsent for the passage of 8iJ1 BO, Waste Diversion Act. AMO, <1long with others including Corporations Supporting Recycling did a full court press lo get each party to support its passage. AMO burned the phones and appeared in the House to lend support. This bill would strengthen product stewardship and provide a new revenue source for municipal waste diversion programs. Lack of passage will not help municipal budgets for 2002 out AMO will continue its efforts to ensure that this legislation is not lost during the legislature's break and that it gets priority when the House convenes. 140 ../2 12/18/B1 23:3B:4B EST; ASSD~IATIDH DF?-) 1 519 633 7661 ~LERH-Elgin ~o Page BB3 DEC-IS-01 TUE 07:26 PM 260 FAX NO. 416 971 6191 P. 02/06 Mombcr Communica\ìons - Alert: --- Prorogation of tho Second Session of [he 37'" Parliament MeMs "". - Page 2 Also notal)lc was the failure to pass Bill 81. the Nutrient Management Act; which would create a legislativo framework for the management of farm nutrients and municipal sewage. On thG other hand, Bill 46, Public SectorAccountability Act. 2001 remains on the Order Paper. AMO and its members havo been cloar that this legislation's applicability to the municipal sector is no longer necessary in light of the nGW Municipal Act. And theHl (hero arc the Private Members' bills and Private bills. Of note is the passage of Bill 105, J-/eÐflh Protection i'lncl Promolion Amendment Act. The Act empowers a medical officer of health to make an order requiring thetaklng of a blood sample from a person where the MOH is of the opinion that the applicant for thc order has come into contact with a bodily substance as a result of being a victim of a crime, providing emergency heEJlth care services or emergency first aid or performing a function prescribed by regulation. The legislation raises a number of privacy concems and may prove dirficult (0 implement. AMO will work with the Association of Local Public Health Agencies in monltorlnn its implementation. Private Mernbers' Bill 95. Ethics and Transparency in Public Matters Actwill also continue. This Bill duplicates parts of existing conflict of interest legislation and accountability measures in the new Municipal Act. AMO has advised the Standing Committee that such duplication and some drafting flaws will, al\1ong other matters confuse the public and make council work more difficult. While the House stands adjourned. AMO is expecting January to be the beginning of anothcr busy yem. A number of the approved bills require the preparation of regulations and we will be there to provkJc input to tl1ese proccsses. In addition. we will be working with Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing (MMAH) to dcvelop an information and education program forthe new Municipal Act. And thcn there is the new full cost accounting forwater and wastewater legislation. We will have work to do onthis bill as well as the Bui/ding Code Enforcement Act, among others, as they work their way through tho legislative process. We will also bc positioning municipal sector interests and will be monitoring the Tory leadership candidates' respective policy platforms as they emerge over the cominfl wecks. AMO stafr recoflnizcs thatthis has been a vcry busyyearand that our many successes are due to [he hackinu and input of our members. To you, our members. a very big thank you for your enduring support and encouragement. Please be sure to renew your membership for 2002. AMO's offices will be closed effective Friday, December 21, re-opening January 2. Remember to circle YOLJrcalendarforthe 2002Annual Conference, in Toronto from August 18 to 21. See you there. Scason~Greeûngs fram AMO St<¡f( This il1fof1l1Mion is available t!Jrougf, AMO's sllbscriplion based MUNICOM no/work at www.municom.com. For more infonn~tion contact (416) 971-9856: patVanini, Direotor of Policy and Government Relations at ext. 316 Tr~msmissjQn problems: 416-971-9856 141 ..... N ..... ..... CD ..... ~ ..... N I.ù I.ù ..... I.ù ..... "" en .... :D en en c::> '"' - :D .... - c::> = c::> ..., ..;J I v <::> m c:> I ~ ex> , = ~ -3 c: m = --.J ~ --.J -0 ::;: Government Status of Government Bifls That Impact Munícipai (As of December 18, 20Q1) l 1 , . I i , Status Comm:tee Purpose Consolidate and Royal Assent iega¡ actions. the proceeds of Ll1llawfu Second Reading and plans business annual present ~ 0> = Require public-sector organizations balance their budgets every year. rules for preventing manure and fertilizers from entering local to ..... U1 ..... '" '" I.ù I.ù ....., '" '" ..... ¡::¡ "" '" '" I "" - '" ~. " '"' o Second Reading Second Reading Royal Assent .., :I> :x: ::z:: s=> ",. ~ 0> (0 --.J ~ 0> ~ (0 ~ Assent Second Reading Royal Assent Royal Assent Royal Assent Allow Mmistry of Labour inspectors to apply for warrants if they believe an offence has been committed. Second Reading Second Reading ,." '" '" " ~ "" .... :-0 = U> "- = 0> Second Reading cost accountir¡g for water and sewer services Mandates ful Bill and Name Bill 1 0 Limitations Act (Hon. D. Young) Bill 30 Remedies far Organized Crime and Other Unlawfu! Activities Act (Hon. D. Young) Bill 46 PUblic Sector Accountability Act (Hor¡. J. Flaher.y) Bill 81 Nutrient Management Act (Hon. B. Coburn) Bill 90 Waste Diversion Act (Hon. E. Witmer) Bill 111 Municipal Act 2001 (Hon. C. Hodgson) Sill ~22 Oak Ridges Moraine fl.ct (Hon. C. Hodgson) Bill 124 Buifding Code EnforcementAct (Hon. C. Hodgson) 8111125 Ontarians With Disabilities Act (Hon. C. Jackson) 8ill127 Responsible Choices for Growth and Fiscal Responsibì1ìty Act (Hon. J. Flaherty) BilI14S Occupational Health and Safety Amendment Act (Hon. C. Stockwell) Bill 148 Emergency Readiness Act (Hon. D. Turnbull) BiII1S0 Toronto Waterfront Revitalization Corporation Act (Hon. Jim Flaherty) BiIIi5S Sustainable Wa Systems Act {Hon. C. HodQsonl i , , freeze, seize and fDrfei~ lav,/s on time limíts for law to reform AI!ow :he use of civi act ivity. i water broader fund implement and Establish supplies. Establish a permanenl, long-term organization to develop waste diversion programs. Update legislation governing municipalities, including giving authority [0 deliver services. Protect na1ura! and water resource features on the Oak Ridges Morair¡e them . I Roya Overhaul building code enforcement to enhance qualifications anc accountability of building practitioners Require the province, municipaUties and the broaderpubiic sector to plan for the removal of barriers to the disabled. Provide a one-time, tax-free payment of S1 00 per child under age sever¡ to low- and middle-income famiiies; repatriate GO Transitto the provincial government. ¡ ~ ..þ. N Mandates plan preparation. training and exercise of designated Ministries Establishes a permanent corporation to develop strategies for the redevelopment and rejuvenation of the Toronto waterfront municipalities and for al ter and Sewage 12/B6/B1 23:B5:B2 EST; ASSOCIATIOn OF?-) 1 519 633 7661 CLERK-Elgin Co Page BB2 DEC-06-0J THU 04:40 PM 260 FAX NO, 416 971 6191 p, 01 £lh1_ Assocjationof _ Municipalities . of Ontario For Your 6nformation 393 Univar~tll~ ;wønue, Su¡to-1701 Toronto, ON M~O 1E;"G Te1: (416) 971-0856' fl]X: (41G) S71-S191 small: arno@'i'tnCl.rnun1COnl.con1 1'0 the attention of the Clerk alld Council. Please onsure t¡¡at copies of tl¡is are distributod to aU Members of Council For Immediate Attention December 6, 2001 - FYI - 01/038 AMO DISCUSSES DISABILITY AND ALTERNATIVE FUEL ISSUES Issue: On Decomber 5,2001, AMO made two separate presentations, one regarding Bill 125, Ontarians wit/¡ Disabilities Act (ODA), ¡¡nd the second regarding Alternative Fuel Soun;es. . Ontarians with Disabilities Act Sandra Ilames, Chaírof AMO's Barrier Free Access Task Force, AMO Board Memberand Councillor City of Brampton, presented AMO's response to Bill 125, Ontarians wit/¡ DisabilítíøsActto the Standing Committee on Finance and Economic Affairs. The response, which built on the theme of "Working Townrds Barrier Free Communities", communicaled ¡:¡ number of points. These points included that the: Bill WElS a goocl first stop and was an improvement on what was in place before; municipalities will need loc¡:¡1 flGxibilityto make local policy and financial decisions in creating and sustaining barrierfree communities; Ltw regulation should allow municir>¡:¡lIties ths opportunities to go further if they choose; municipali!iø¡) arc loaders in creaUng and sust<Jining barrier free communities; and municipalities are alrom1y sponding millions of dollars and involving the disabled communityto meet the goal ofbarríerfree communities. AMO's presenté1tion also called on the Province to do a number of things. AMO called on the Province to allocate tl1c nccessary funding to municipalitics to create barrier free communities: to create a level pl¡¡ying field by requiring the private sector to meetlhe same requirements faced by municipalities, to consult municipalities on tile developmenlofthe Act's rcgulations or any other issues resulting from tile Act, to put more focus on the issuance of disabled parking permits not only the enforcement oftheir misuso; and to cover any unexpected costs trignered by the Acts or its regulations. . Alleflldtive FlIflJ Sources Marvin Caplan, AMO Board Member and COllncillor of City of Hamilton, presented AMO's position regarding alternative fuel sources to the Provincial Select Committee on Alternative Fuel Sources. AMO's presenbtion discussod the effective and progressive work municipalities arE) doing to reduce air emissions in their communities, particularly in the areas of fleet management and landfill gas recovery. AMO highlighted the potenlial benefits of promoting ethanol fuel production and distribution to mducc (¡ir omissions and for economic development in rural/agricultural communilies. AMO <II so outlined how municipalities con continue to demonstmte leadership in the area of reducing emissions. Sorno suggestions were to adapt iow emission initiatives (i.e, low sulfur fuel policy, low emissions vÐhicle procurement or conversion policy, promote energy efficient programs), and capture and use methaneuasfrom landfills, The Commilleewill be doing further consultations and AMO has been asked to m;¡I\O 8dditiollsl contributions. The complete versions of the two presentations can be found on the AMO's subscription based MUNICOM network fJt \'J.)NWJ!1.\lnjC9m~com. 1 43 For more information contact: Pat Vanini, Dirctlor of Policy and Government Relations at416-971-985G ex!. 316. 11/27/B1 23:16:42 EST; ASSOCIATION OF?-> 1 519 633 7661 CLERK-Elgin Co Page BB2 NOV-27-01 TUE 05:33 PM 260 FAX NO. 416 971 6191 P. 01 .M'øxíiÞer.Communiçation Â~_ Associationof , Municipalities . ofOmaño For Your On formation 3S3 U'llvo.fafty Avenue. suit. 1701 Toronto, ON MSG 1E6 Tel: (.II16) 971-9856· 'aJe:: (416) 071-6191 emall: tafT.lO@nmo.mun!comcom To the attention offhe Clerk and Council. Please ensure that copies of this are distributed to all Members of Council For Immediate Attention November 27,2001 - FYI· 01/036 Legislation of Significance to the Municipal Sector - Status Report Issue: AMO appears atthe Standing Committee on the New Municipal Act and continues to advocate rcmoval of the municipal sector from Bill 46 and Bill 95, among other things. Stalus: · 8i/J '111, MunicipaJAct, 2001: The Standing Committee on General Government has concluded the public heming cQrnponent of Bi11111. Clause by clause is scheduled for Wednesday, November 28. AMO m¡:¡de a presentation to the Committee last Wednesday and has been busy in the ensuing clays advocating its recommendations for improving the legislation. One of the key recommendations is that the Icgislation and related regulations should be reviewed every five years. A copy of AMO's submission can be downloaded from www.m.\Jpiçgfl1com. AMO al¡;o worked with OMAA, AMCTO. OGRA and MFOA on their technical reviews. We anticipate that some of these recommendations will be motions during clause by clause. We are advised thata companion piece of legislation will come forward next year to deal with some housekeeping matters and it allows LIS time to continue to work on changes that require some additional time to analyse and to discuss with the government. AMO tms been very supportive of tile pre-consultation provisions of the Bill and is pleased that Minister Hodgson has committed to involving the municip<:11 sector in work on various key regulations required to implement tile Act. In addition, we have strongly urged the government to have these regulations in place by the Spring so that municipal councils and their staff have the appropriate training, information ¡:¡nd time to undertake tile necessary work to get readyforthe Acfs proclamation. This is still anticipated for Janu;:uy2003 provided the Bill is brought back to the House before this current Session concludes. We have been given some confidence that this is the intent. · Bill 46, Public Sector Accountability Act,2001, was introduced as part ofthe May Budget and has yetta receive Second Reading. AMO, wilh its membership support, has been advising the government that tile Bill is not necessary for the municipal sector. There are already numerous mandated accoun!¡¡bility and reporting measures that municipalities must undertake and the new Municipal Act sufficiently cleCls with the matter. As an order of government that goes to the polls at predictable and regular intclVals, and that involves the public in Cllmost all of its decision-making processes, including its budget process, municipal governments are by far the most accountable and the most accessible. 144 .../2 11/27/B1 23:17:35 EST; ASSOCIATION OF?-> NOV-27-01 rUE 05:34 PM 260 Momber Communication - FYI: . .. 1 519 &33 7&&1 CLERK-Elgin Co Page BB3 FAX NO, 416 971 6191 P. 02 Legislatio~ of Significance to the Municipal Sector - Status Report _ P. 2 · Bill 95, Ethics and Transparency in Public Matters Act, 2001, is a private member's bill. It received Socond Reading and is currently atthe Public Accounts Standing Committee. AMO had sent a letter to the member outlining a number of reasons why the Bill is poorly drafted and why the duplication and vagLlcmcss in the Bill would be problematic, particularly for the public that it is intended to serve. Our understanding is that the concern that initiated the Bill was related to a local school board matter. AMOfeelsthatthe municipal sector has clearrules on accountability and conf1ict of interest. AMO has made a written su brnission to the Committee again expressing our concems with the confusion that this Bill will generato given the existing provisions and penalties. AMO reiterated its c@1I at last week's Standing Committee appearance that the sector be removed from these Bills. AMO Advocacy on Yet More Important Legislation: · Bill 90, Waste Diversion Act: Clause by clause on this Bill concluded yesterday with some é1mrmdrnents that the municipal sector was requesting. This legislation, if passed, will provide additional product s!ewardshipsupport as well as revenue for municipalities for recycling programs, beginning with the Blue Box system. If the Bill passes, it will establish on a permanent basis, the WDO (Waste Diversion Ontario) and will set up various industry funding organizations (IFOs). AMO has been telling the government and the opposition parties that this legislation must get into the House and dealt with bofore!lm Session ends so that municipalities may considerthe revenuè potential in their2002 budget deliberations. · Bill 81, NutrientManagementAct, 2001: The Bill, if passed, sets out a framework, which will allow the govemmentto develop province-wide standards forthe collection, storage, handling, transporh;¡tion and é1pplication of nutrients on agricultural/and. Without passage ofthe legislation, regulatoryworkwill be delayed. Thore are municipalities with interim control bylaws that will be running out shortlywhìch will acId furlher difficulties. AMO is reviewing the recent court decision on West Perth's zoning bylaw in terms of this µroposod legislation. Thero are other pieces of legislation that affect our members, For example, 8i1l127, Responsible Choices for Growth and Fiscal Responsibility Act. 2001, which further implements the provincial budget and notably provides for the provincial take-back of GO Transit, and Bill 122, Oak Ridges Moraine. In addition, Bill 125, On/ario Disability Act, has received Second Reading and is going to Committee next weol~. AMO has requosteej the opportunity to make a presentalion. AMO's advice to the government in the dmfting ofthe Bill can be downloaded and our COmments on the BiU itselfwill be available next week. And if that is not enough.., AMO is working on a submission to Minister Hodgson on the province's propoSGd Smart Growth initiative. Members have been keeping us informed of their perspective ofthe Ministry's consultation process. AMO's Executive Committee had the opportunity to informally discuss the matter with Secretariat staff at a recent meeting and directed staff to prepare a submission. With the assistance of our Planning Task Force, AMO provided advice on the Ministry's review of the Provincial Policy Statements and howtlley can be improved to deal with what are considered provincial interests. These aro only a few ofthe many issues AMO's policytearn is working on. Please feel free to cfJlI us. A thank you to the many members that supported AMO's resolution calling for a return to a 1/3 funding fOmlUlfJ forinfrastructure and special consideration for municipalities that would find a 1 f3 contribution difficult. To date, we have received 232 supporting resolutions. AMO's work with its members support has made a differenCGwìth the Province announcing its agreement to a 1/3 funding formula for OST AR 1 applications. While this is shortof ourexpectéltion that it apply to all SuperBuild municipal programs, it is a significant improvement. We expect a roll-out of a large numberof OST AR 1 announcements very soon. - 1 45 12/87/81 23:88:32 EST; ASSOCIATIon OF?-> 1 519 633 7661 CLERK-Elgin Co Page 882 DEC-07-01 FRI 07:01 PM 260 FAX NO. 416 971 6191 P. 01 £~_ Association or l Municipaiitie-s .¡. of Ont~rjo For Your 6nformation $03 Unh/Cmily AvonuQ, Suile 1701 T"lonlo. ON M5G 1E6 Tel: (418) 971~9B56 ~ fs,x: (416) 971-61!>t CIT130!!~ l"uY1o@.¡)mo,n\unJcom,com Fo" the immediate attention of the Clerk and Council. December 7,2001 . FYI - 01/039 SuperBuild Hosts Drinking Water Financing strategy Forum I~;suc: AMO presGnted its position on infrastructure financing at the SuperBuild Water Infrastructure Policy and Financing Forum earlier this w8ek. Background: SuperBuild hosted a policy forum on issues and ideas for the future of water infrastructure financing in Ontario in Toronto, December 3-4,2001. AMO was invited to make a presentation at the Forum, on a municipal perspective on the challenges of water infrastructure financing in Ontario. The presentation was made by Nigel B0l1chamber, Secretary-Treasurer of AMO, and Commissioner of Financc for the City of London, and Nicola Crawhall, AMO staff. In tho presontation, AMO outlined the areas wherc it felt thcre is growÌllg consensus, and areas where there is ~.till need for in-depth analysis and public debate. Consensus issues include: 1. The cconomics of drinking water delivery in Ontario is in the process offundamental change, due to a reduclion in senior government grants, the cost of replacing maturing infrastructure, and new costly regulations ünd technologies. 2. In the absence of government grants, thew is liltle choice but to move to full cost recovery. Municipalitics will need transition funding to help get to full cost recovery, and there may be some municipal systems that will require ongoing assistance given the high costs per household on small wator systems. The move to full cost recovcry could affect human seltlement patterns, land use plannin~l decisions, and economic development throughout the province. The process must therefore tJecurefully ana lysed and modelled. phased-in, and it must be transparent and inclusivc, giving water rolc paycrs and managers plenty of notice and opportunity to provide input. 3. Given [he above changes In financing watcr infrastructure, municipalities will have to adjust their finance management strategies towards long term, sustainable asset management practices. 4. Small water systems will most likely be the hardest hit with the increased costs of drinking water delivery. Tllis could produce unwanted consequences, like we have seen with Regulation 459, with pcople drilling their own wells to avoid the increased costs of public water delivery. AMO ¡¡Iso offercd perspectives on the pros and cons of reorganizing water delivery into larger service areas to benefit from ewnomies of scale. AMO pointed out. larger does not necessarily mean cheaper. In ¡¡mas wllh only small waterworks that cannot be physically connected and no larger waterworks wllere costs can be cross subsidized, therc are no economic efficiencies to be gained. AMO also indicated that some municipalities may gain some managerial and technological advantages where needed by entering into public-private partnerships. However, full privatization did not seem to be in the bcst interest of water consumers. given the nature of the s0rvice, which is essential to human health, and is a natural monopoly. Public sector ownership and oversight are key to the accountability required Llr1der these circlJlTlstances. Status: Clearly, the delivery of water in Ontario is being reconsidered by the Province in terms of pricing, cost recovery, and org,misational structure. SupcrBuild has been charged with developing a long-term investment and financing strategy for water and ¡¡eWer infrastructure. SuperBuild has commissioned a number of studies, including an invcntory of water and sewer infrastructure assets, and a comprehensive database of water and wastewater pricing in Ontario, and current practices. AMO believes that these con$u1tinfJ studies are important to the analysis f)nd consideration of future pricing, financing, and organisational practices and options. Please find the presentation on AMO's subscriplion based MUNICOM, www.municom.com. For more inforl113tioll contact: Nicola Crawhall, Senior Policy Advisor at 415-9'/1-9855 ex t. 329 - 146 December 10, 2001 Federa.don of Camdian Muniåpaliûes MEMBER ADVISORY Federal budaet responds to FCM investment priorities "Stronger communities, stronger Canada" 'Today's budget announcements put local communities at the centre of Canada's economic, social and environmental goals," says Jack Layton, FCM President. 'The Govemment of Canada has heard many of our messages." In its 2001 Federal Budget submission FCM called for: · Accelerated/increased spending in the Infrastructure Canada program emphasizing water; and movement toward a permanent municipal infrastructure program; · greenhouse gas reductions; · brownfields redevelopment; · an integrated, multi-modal transportation program; · initiatives aimed at increasing availability of affordable housing; · funding for connectivity and e-government; and · foreign aid spending for poverty reduction and HIV/AIDS in Africa. The Government of Canada today responded to almost all of FCM's priorities, including: · A Strategic Investment Foundation with a minimum $2 billion. available for large infrastructure projects, including urban transportation, conventiôn centres, sewage treatment and highways (with an initial allocation from this year's year-end surplus funds) and $600 million for border infrastructure program; · A doubling to $250 million for the Green Municipal Funds and interest rate flexibility to make loans to the municipal sector more competitive; · A National Brownfield Redevelopment Strategy; · An additional $1 billion for intemational development; · An affirmation of the earlier commitment of $680 million for affordable housing, to be matched by the provinces and territories; and · A Production Incentive for wind energy and tax incentives for renewable energy and certain energy efficiency projects. 'We are concerned that the Govemment of Canada did not indicate its long-term intentions for public transit and affordable housing, nor respond favourably to our proposed tax measures in these areas, but the Strategic Infrastructure Foundation could be a useful instrument if municipal governments are involved in the development and planning. 'The doubling of the resources available to the Green Municipal Funds is clearly welcome and FCM intends to put this money to work in communities across Canada to achieve sustainable community development," added Layton. For more information, contact: James Knight, Chief Executive Officer 613-241-5221, ext223 Jack Layton 416-721-6151 147 Federation of Canadian Municipalities Fédération canadienn. des municipalités November 30,2001 MEMBER ADVISORY FCM POSITION ON RECOMMENDATION TO LIST ROAD SALTS AS TOXIC UNDER THE CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ACT The Govemment of Canada today recommended that road salt be added to Schedule 1 under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act (CEPA). A substance listed on Schedule 1 is considered toxic either to human health or the environment because it is inherently toxic or because it can reach concentrations that are toxic. Road salt is recommended fOr Schedule 1 because it can reach concentrations that can be toxic to the environment. The Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM) will take the fOllowing actions: 1. FCM will work with its members, the Transportation Association of Canada, provincial road authorities, and the Govemment of Canada to identify cost-effective measures to responsibly manage the use of road salt while maintaining public safety on road systems; and 2. FCM will ensure that member interests are prDtected as management options are developed during the two-year risk management phase. FCM will consult with its members and seek apprDval of its National Board of Directors fOr any proposed management instruments. The Risk Management Phase will end in December 2003. ApprDved management options will be implemented by Winter 2005. Members may wish to provide comments over the next 60 days to Environment Canada on its recommendation to list road salt on Schedule 1. FCM will post its submission on its Web site at www.fcm.ca. For more information, contact Sylvestre Fink at 613-241-5221 , ext. 230. Mission Statement The F~on cfC.tmøJiJm Munid/,ahtk (FCM.J hiis bmI ;/;c notiomlV(Ji·(uf7l1Wtiâpd.f!J!renimentsdnc~l90J. FCM is~tfJ imprrn'ÜlgtlJtqlJdlity DI~ß i.<¡. nlJœmmwÛM°by promoting rtlrmg. ~ llIitllirrowtliibk mwzici¡Jd! ffwemmetlt.. Énoncé de mission La FidlfratÙ;1I MuuJimnt' In munídpa1ith (FCM) <'!:St Is mJix 7fæhonafrda golrt~ m:JI.1IidpdrJXdqmj,¡ 19tH. LtFG'J ~11",1Ik à 4I11iIiøm- fa qI$«liti d~ vie dmJs tf¡um /(¡ (oUn:#uitls th fill'trriJdnt rh ,'ljJIm'fJJcJ!ttnts J/tf171icipa1!X firts. 4!imus d mptJmab!ð: C'..ouncillorJa.ds:l.ayton Toronro. Onw1o Presidel'lt President Alderman John Sdunat C'.a1gary, Al~l'ta pj~ Vice Pnsident Premier viCl:'--p[ésident Maire \\'t:S Ducharme Hull (Qu;'=) Second Vìœ Pres1dem De1.ciême vice-pr6ickm Mavor Ann M~n N;" Gl«.sgQw. Nova Scotia Third Vice Preskknr Troi.~ièmf: vice-présJdente Councillor Joanne Monaghan Kitim;¡t, Brici!:h CoJumb.î2 P:z.",Prcsidc:nt Pres¡d~nte sottu,t~ James w: Knight Chitf .E.'œt:u!:Î\'e Offi~t Chef de 1a direction 24ru.eCJ.treoœSmet Ottawa, OmariQ KIN 51>3 'Zt (613) 241-5221 18 (613) 241-744" Ccdcration@Fcm.ca W~b ¡itclsitcv.~: www.fcm..c:J. Economic and Soci:¡J Poliry Poliríque$ économiqu~ ~t ¡¡aciates 18 (6131244-225" policy@!"".<a Sustainable Commu.niries and EuvirUluut:ntal Policy Col~c:rivités:"iahleset . politiqL1~ c=t.lI'Üonl1t:mo.1tales 18 (613) 244-/515 conununities@fan.ca Co.rpOtate De'\.'elopmem Développement oorporaàf 18 (6/31241-2126 corpu.t'ilœ@fcm.ca InœmatiomJ. Ccinre fi)r Mm~iclpal DmJopment únue In[{;rcatio!l;]1 pour k d¿V'ek\pp~mf;:nr municipal [f!. (6131241-7117 intttna:tiona.l@fc:m.CiI. 148 ~ Federation of Canadian Municipalities JÞN 2 2002 Fédération canadienne des municipalités December 7, 2001 Elected and Appointed Municipal Officials: Take Note Plan Now to Attend FCM's Second Annual Sustainable Communities Conference and Trade Show Ottawa. Ontario. Februarv 7 - 9, 2002 Help build a better quality of life through sustainable community development by attending the Federation of Canadian Municipalities' (FCM) Second Annual Sustainable Communities Conference and Trade Show. Find out how your community can benefit from FCM's Green Municipal Funds. Learn from world leaders in sustainability. Retool, rethink and reinvest with hands-on workshops. Network with your peers and meet senior federal officials who can help your municipality implement sustainable strategies. From seminars and workshops to plenary sessions and a trade show with leading environmental firms, everyone with a stake in the municipal sector should attend Canada's most important conference on sustainability. Space is limited, so please review the attached Preliminary Program and Registration Information and send the required forms to FCM before January 19, 2002. Members of FCM's Partners for Climate Protection Program participate at $95.00. The fee for all other delegates is $295. I look forward to meeting you in Ottawa. Yours sincerely, ~~ Jack Layton President Federation of Canadian Municipalities 149 Mission Statement The Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM) has bem the national voice (If municipal governments since 1901" FCM is dedicated to improving the quality of life in aiL communities by promoting strong, effictive and accountable municipal government. Énoncé de mission La Fédératioll amadimne desmunicipalités (FCM) est In. voix l!/ltionale des gOllvememems municipal/x depuis 1901. La FClv! est vOilà ÌI améliorer fa qualité elf vie dans (outes les colleäivités en þ¡¡¡orisant deli gout'erneme1lts mmÛcipaux ¡Om, efficaæs e~ responsables. Counci!lor Jack Layton Toronro, Omario ,Presidem 0Présidenr Alderman John Schmal Calgary, .-\1berra Firsr Vice Presidem Premier vice-présidenr Maire Yves Ducharme HuU(Québec) Second Vice President Deuxième vice-présjdem Mayor Ann MacLean New Glasgow, Nova Scoria Third Vice President Troisième vice-présidenre Councillor Joanne Monaghan Kitimar, British Columbia PastPresidem Présideme sortame James \XI: Knight ChiefExecurive Officer Chef de la direction 24 rue Clarence Srreet Ottawa, Ontario KIN 5P3 'fi' (613) 241-5221 Qìi (613)241-7440 federation@fcm,ca Web site/site web: www.fcm.ca Economic and Social Policy Poliriques économiques er sociales Qìi (613) 244-2250 policy@fcm.ca Sustainable Communities and Environmental Policy Collectivités vtables et politiques environnememales Qìi (613)244-1515 comrnunities@fcrn.ca Corporare Development Développemem corporatif Qìi (613)241-2126 corporate@fcm.ca International Centre for Municipal Developmem Centre international pour Ie développemem municipal Qìi (613)241-7117 international@fcm.ca ~ ~; Jl,N 9 2002 January 8th , 2002 Warden John Wilson, Members of Elgin County Council, Mark McDonald, & Linda Veger c/o Elgin County Administrative Offices 450 Sunset Drive St, Thomas, ON N5R 5V1 Dear Warden Wilson, Members of Council, Mark, & Linda; On behalf of the SI. Thomas-Elgin Public Art Centre, I would like to thank you for your annual support of $5,000 to help fund the Centre's visual arts programs for Elgin County youths. I acknowledge our receipt of this grant for which we are truly grateful. Once again, thank you very much for supporting this important cómmunity project. Your contribution makes all the difference. Sincerely, d~ Lori Chamberlain Executive Director -- In Case of Transmission Difficulties, Please Call 416-863-2101 Please Deliver To: The County of Elgin Ministry of Municipal Affairs and I-Iousing Office of the MInister 777 Bay Street Toronto ON M5G 2E5 Tal: (416) 585-7000 WV'M.mah.gov.on.ca Mlnlstère des Affaires municipales et du Logement Bureau du ministre TT7 rue Bay Toromo ON M5G 2E5 Tél: (416) 586·7000 W'\VW.mah.gov.on.ca Ni ~ Ontario January 7, 2002 To Heads of Council: In December 12, I introduced framework legislation that would help ensure safe and sustainable water services for Ontario. If passed. the proposed legislation would be an important step to ensuring long-term financial stability for water and sewage systems. Moving toward full-cost recovery is good stewardship. If the true cost of using water services is paid, we hope to see it is no longer taken for granted and this important natural resource will used more wisely. Municipalities know it is critical to have water and sewer systems that are well- maintained and up to date, and many of you have taken steps to ensure this. I applaud your actions and look forward to working closely with municipalities through the legislative and regulatory processes to meet the objective of providing clean, safe and sustainable water services to the people of Ontario. Together we can ensure the proposed legislation is practical and effective. The Sustainable Water and Sewage Systems Act, 2001 has now received first reading and we will work together throughout the legislative process to find practical solutions for preserving groundwater and our many lakes and rivers as one of Ontario's most precious resources. The analysis of the full cost of water use will enable the public to see the true cost of providing these services and help municipalities develop strategies to ensure water and sewage systems are sustainable. These strategies will provide certainty in hOw needed infrastructure costs will be financed. Details would be provided through regulation. For more information, I refer you to the ministry's web site at www.mah.gov.on.ca. Sincerely, ¿/L Hon. Chris Hodgso Minister -- 156 rrom. K~ttl~ Cr~~k C.A. r ~l9 63l ~026 P..g~ l of 2 OlIO? 102 l4ll~ January 8, 2002 For im~d¡'ate re1ea.~c Exclusive to the Times-Journal Attcntìon~ Mr. Mark ButtC';["ioVick Page 2 of2 Faxed: 631·5653 Report says more tests needed at Port Stanley creek contamination site ST. THOMAS - Kettle Creek Conservation Authority (KCCA) says additional testing in Port Stanley harbour may be needed to dctennine thc to"icity of sediments fonnd in Kett1e Creek. KCCA gcneral manager Bryan Hall has received a report from Acres and As""ciates of Toronto saying testing of bottom sediments for conuunination confinned a coal tar deposit upstream of the King George VI Lifibridge. KCCA and the Municipality of Central E1gin paid $35,000 for the Acres' study. Dredging in Kettle Creek to prevent ice jams and flooding was halted two years ago when conœminants were discovered near the Ultnunar lank funn site, about 10-20 metres off,hore and across from Harbour C1ub Condominiums. This site, said Hall, and another site downstream of the George Street drain, weœ targeted for further study by KCCA before more dredging could take place. Hall said while the contamination is not known to be of immediate danger to people, "eonœntra!Ìon of contamination at the George Street drain site exceeds all government guidelines, wilhin the drain and at least 2,000 metros of creek bonom downstream of the drain," according to the repOl!. Sediment quality guidelines are established by the Ontario Ministry of the Enviromuent (MOE) and Environment Canada. "The contaminants are moving slowly downstream, at an unknown rale, through grovel and sand scdimcnt.. tow81'd the main harbour," said Hall. The Acres' report, which was just received by the KCCA board of directors and Central Elgin Council, concludes the highest levels of coal tar are found at the oullet of the George Street drain, indicating that ¡¡it unknown reservoir of coal tar may be found in drain sedimenlS. The original source of the contamination, upstream at the fonner Shamrock Chemical site, was subject to an MOE-sponsored clean-up in the mid 1990s. The source was capped from any further leakage to the George Street drain. The: cQnti:uninants arc primarily organics and petroleum hydrocarbons, $aid Hal], although testing was limited to specific agents. The Acres' report showed contaminant and concentration levels have not dropped between studies conducted by the MOE;n 1987 and KCCA last year. Hall said KCCA plans to study maintenance of the hydraulic capacity of the creek. a project that will cost KCCA about $15,000. "If dredging upstream and downsrream of the contamination site continues, safe passage of flood flows may be possible," he said. -30- For additional infonnation, contact: Bryon D. Hån, Kettlc '-'reck Comcrvalion Authority, Tel. 631-1270 Don Leitch, Municipality of Central Elgin, Tel. 631·4860 Brian Boudreau., Ministty of the Environment, Tel. 873·5055 George Dawson, Elgin St. Thomas Health Unit, TeL 631-9900 157 Tillsonburg & District Multi-Service Centre Telepbone (519) 842-9000 Fax (519) 842-4727 Tbe Livingston Centre 96 Tillson Avenue, Tillsonbnrg, ON N4G 3Al Mission To provide human support resources Vision Enabling individual independence January 8, 2002 J'N ., O· 2",°0 I-P', ---. 1);'.1' Council Members County of Elgin 450 Sunset Drive St. Thomas ON N5R 5Vl At!: Linda Veger, Treasurer/J.D. Huether, Deputy Treasurer Dear Council/Staff: On behalf of the TiIIsonburg & District Multi-Service Centre we would like to thank you for your recent grant of $2,000.00. As you may know, the TiIIsonburg & District Multi-Service Centre has been providing community services since 1978. We often reflect on our humble beginnings, starting with one service, in the house on Rolph Street and marvel at the development that has occurred in the provision of services in TiIIsonburg. Our present location, in a multi-partner building called The Livingston Centre, reflects those changing times. Enclosed is a pamphlet describing our many current programs. The generosity of the surrounding community has contributed to our ability to respond to community and individual client needs - our primary focus. While we do receive regular funding in some of our programming areas, this is not the case for every service. That is why we host two regular fundraising events each year and encourage grants such as the County of Elgin has provided. These funds allow us to commit to programs that require community support in order to receive regular funding. It also allows us to plan for future needs. If you have any questions about your grant, or have any other comments or questions, we would like to hear from you. Thank you for investing in our current needs and future plans. ~~ Marlene Pink, Executive Director ~ IIJM~ Maureen Vandenberghe, Fund Development Coordinator 158 The Tillsonburg & District Multi-Service Centre History A Short dignity Believes in. Treating the individual withrespect, and compassion o The Centre was formed because a group of community minded citizens was concerned about services available the lack of social j¡) Tillsonburg The Centre began operations in at 185 Rolph Street, in a building donated by Geny Livingston Prior to the Centre, many service · The value of community volunteers and staff of Equal opportunities for the development each perSOll 'spotential o o 978, · The Tillsonburg & District Multi-Service Centre Being accountable ¡oour communities through the evaluation and reporting of our results and the effective and efficient use of our resources o rm A work envir(mmentthat promotes cooperation, participation and effective communications o Contmuous quality improvement of all our new and existing prograJl.1s and services o to Thursday to 8:30 p.m. Friday to 4:30 p.m. 8:30 a.m. The continuous development and application of new skills and knowledge o a casual space Various services came into tpe Centre over the years depending upon need In August 1998 the MSC moved into the Livingston Centre, named after Gerry Livingston, along with Fanshawe College, Human Resources Developmell Canada, Thames Valley District School Board and COlT munity Living Tillsonburg Mr. Livingston was well known in the com lunity for is busmess abilities and his support ofmuny causes (community services, spolis). He supported Canada's Olympic male basketball teams in 1952 and 1960, received Papal honours in 1962 and died in 1988 The Livingston Centre provides a number of community, health, educatiónand social services in qne locatiqn ~ an impOl1ant gqal Of~I~... , founders of the Tillsonburg and Dis with consumers on wherever they could find providers met basis · · .,¡.." · · Monday 8:30 a;m. Working h? parinership with the community and other service providers to identify community needs and to develop effective service and program responses o ~ VI 'Û · The Livingston Centre 96 Tillson Avenue Tillsonburg, ON N4G 3Al Phone: (5 I 9) 842"9000 Fax: (519) 842-4727 ¡;;;¿ www. ocl. flet/projects/¡¡vÌ1lgstoflceflt~e u..... original Multi-Service Centre ~ Personal Support Services/Homemaking. personal care, meal preparation, light housekeeping, laundry and care giver relief provided by trained Home Support Workers Home Maintenance: indoor/outdoor tasks · Protective Services client: "/ can talk and she helps me Wit/I nCluding: lawn/garden care,snow removal painting, windows, eaves cleaning, etc. Meals on Wheels: A hot meal delivered to · Former Ai/ult to my worker about III/ythillg " Adult students benefit through improvement in reading, writing and mathematics skills: · Literacy Bridging Initiative: small group instruction - three options: reading/writing, literacy/conlputer, literacy/internet. · One-an-One Tutoring: one to one instruction for adults based on individual goals. potato, and the security check are also provided by volunteers home consisting of soup, meat, vegetable and dessert. A brief visit the · left alone allowing caregiver go way for a day, a weekend 24 hour care for someone be Respite Care. who cannot to relax or daily rest or Supportive Housing: assistance with living activities and access to on-cal support services 24 hours a day in designated buildings. Volunteer Transportatiòn: assistance for For youth and adults all T&DMSC employment programs provide: one on one employment counselling and planning; job search supp0l1 and workshops [resumes, cover letters, interview skills]; career exploration and assessment; daily job postings; resources [computers, internet, telephones, faxing, photocopying, job banks, printed material]. Further information on options: · Job Connect (Youth Employment): on the job training/employer subsidy for individuals 16-24 (29 if disabled) if non EI/WSIB eligible and out of full-time school/work. realland write, / Ihejob. Former SIIII/ent: ~'Now tlla! I C(II¡ fee/like I allljustlike Ihe reIt of ti,e guys Oli I CIII/ do lilY job beller alll/fee/like I alll contributing. I dOll 't "live 10 rely on a co-worker to help file out. " · developmentally disabled COll1l11unity Counsellil1g: individua marital, family and group counselling on fee-far-service basis with professional counsellors. Free walk in clinic first longer. · supp0l1 Program. the Services and advocacy services fOl Protective Adull · a · · to help them go shopping or who have no one else clients get to medical appointments, visiting. Services: available to EI eligible Adull · Monday of the mont Employer Assislance Supportive Housing cIienl:"My HOllle Supporl Worker help" lIle dllY l/nd nighl so I dOli 'I have 10 go to a nursing home. " youth and all adults. Summer Jobs Services: a placement and employer subsidy program for students 15- 24 years of age who are returning to schoo · Program: quick access to counselling services (no cost) for ndividuals and their families employed by ~ 0---. C> Former Home Maintenance clients: It We are proud of ollr hOllle - inside alll/ olltside. TIIlII/k., to YOllr service it continuej' to be ,ltat way." "There WIIS a sellse of belonging 10 ill the same position I am llnd It WWi encouraging Former client: II group of people who are (loss of hearl, self-esteem). gives hope. " whom we Giver Supporl Group: weekly support, tated by a professional, for those 19 with the stress of care giving. with businesses have contracts. faci dea nclustries and Care · ~ blliltup UThe progral1 my resllme." Former training placement: my confidence llIIl' imprOl'ed Former Counselling dient: "/ really appreciate all tile support and under.\'tandillg. I (1I11 starting to fWile poÛtive days /lOW aud itfeel.~ great." CORPORATION OF THE COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX County Building, 399 Ridout Street N., London, Outario N6A 2P1 (519) 434-7321 FAX: (519) 434-0638 JM,I I ~ ?On? MIDDLESEX COUNTY January 10, 2002 The Hon. Tony Clement Minister of Health & Long Term Care 80 Grosvenor Street Hepburn Block, 10th Floor, Toronto, Ontario M7A 2C4 Dear Minister: On December 11,2001, Middlesex County Council adopted the following resolution of its Community Services Committee: "That we petition the Province of Ontario to fund 50% of the salary increases of land ambulance personnel. Currently the Province funds the salaries of land ambulance personnel based on 2000 rates plus 2% for the year 2001, while most increases were arbitrated by Provincially appointed arbitrators of approximately 17%" I am sure this issue is not new to you. Regardless, it is a very important issue to the County of Middlesex, and continues to be a very important issue with a significant cost impact. The principle of 50% funding by the Province for land ambulance services is at stake. I would be pleased to meet with you to discuss this issue further. Members of Middlesex County Council, and myself, wish to have this matter resolved. AE/kb C.C.: Counties and Regions in Ontario AMO Opposition critics in the Provincial Legislature AI Edmondson Middlesex County Warden 1 61 Room 33t Main Legislative Building Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A1A4 ~ "- Ontario Constituency Office: 542 Talbot Street St. Thomas, Ontario N5P 1 C4 Tel: (519) 631-0666 Fax: (519) 631-9478 Toll Free: 1-800-265-7638 steve_peters-mpp-co @ontla.ola.org Tel: (416) 325-7250 Fax: (416)325-7262 Email: steve_peters-mpp @ontla.ola.org STEVE PETERS, M.P.P. ELGIN - MIDDLESEX - LONDON .IbN 2 2002 December 27,2001 Warden John Wilson Elgin County 450 Sunset Drive St. Thomas, ON N5R 5Vl Dear Warden Wilson: Please find enclosed a response from Honourable James Flaherty, Minister of Finance to the Elgin County resolution concerning the high costs of gasoline taxes. As the Minister has indicated that a further letter on August 15, 2001 from Mr. Tom ~~i;¡" Sweeting, also from the Ministry of Finance, has been sent to you, I would appreciate ~ ,.,.-,) 0 your keeping me infonned as to the contents and tone ofthat correspondence. ..¡JP Should you require any other assistance or input from me on this or any other matter of a provincial nature, please feel free to contact me at any time. Thank you for keeping me informed on this important issue. Sincerely, ~\k- Steve Peters, M.P.P. Elgin-Middlesex'London , . .. Vice.premier ministre et ministre des Finances L'hon. James M. Flaherty ~ [t~.] -~ Ontario Deputy Premier. and Minister of Finance The Hon. James M. Flaherty 7 Queen's Park Crescent Toronto ON M7A 1Y7 Telephone: 416 325·0400 Facsimile: 416325-0374 7. Queen's Park Crescent Toronto ON M7 A 1 Y7 Té!éphone: 416325-0400 T élécopîeur: 416 325-0374 '\"i 3 0 ?~un' Ul.. _ '!Jj Mr. Steve Peters. MPP Elgin-Middlesex -London 542 Talbot Street St. Thomas 0:-< N5P IC4 Dear Mr. Peters: Thank you for your letter dated August 16, 200 I, regarding a resolution from the County of Elgin concerning gasoline taxes. In your letter. you requested that I address the County of Elgin's concerns directly. Mr. Tom Sweeting, Assistant Deputy Minister, Office of the Budget and Taxation, Ministry of Finance, has already responded to the resolution of the County of Elgin, in a letter mailed on August, 15,2001, to Ms. Sandra J. Heffren, Deputy Clerk. I have enclosed a copy for your information. You also indicated in your letter that you would like to see the Government of Ontario regulate fuel taxes, as other provinces have done. Regulation is usual1y applied where there is a monopoly supplier or where a "natural" monopoly exists. One exarnple of a natural monopoly is the provision of natural gas service, where it rnakes sense to build only one gas line, rather than several, to the home or business. The fuel business is dominated by a small number of large marketers who compete with each other and with smal1er independent marketers for the motorists' business. We may disagree on how competitive the fuel market is. but it is clearly not a monopoly or even a natural monopoly. The experience of other jurisdictions suggests that regulation may result in higher, not lower, prices to consumers over time. One reason for this is that regulation may dul1 the incentive for rnarketers to be as efficient as possible, denying consumers the best quality products at the lowest possible prices. Ten years ago, the Government of Nova Scotia ended many years of regulation of its market for petroleum products because it came to believe that regulation was no longer serving the consumer's interest. Although the Government of Newfoundland recently regulated its fuel market, it did so to smooth out price fluctuations, not to reduce prices. ...2 .", '.'''- """." ·-C· ~.. ,....-.. . ,- , ",' '.'_.. '~:' ',', .", :-~- '0", ~-~"'-';:'>~",~~~::",- Mr. Steve Peters, MPP Page 2 The Ontario Government has taken several steps to address high fuel prices. In the 2000 Ontario Budget, the government announced it would phase out by 2004 the provincial sales tax on vehicle insurance premiums and vehicle repairs made under warranty. Last fall, the government rnailed out a cheque of up to $200 to every taxpayer in the province. Taxpayers can use this money to help offset their high fuel bills. With regards to the issue of the federal surtax on fuel, Mr. Sweeting forwarded a copy of Ms. Heffren's correspondence to the federal Minister of Finance, the Honourable Paul Mar1in, for his consideration. Thank you again for writing. Should you have any further concerns about Ministry of Finance issues in your role as MPP for Elgin-Middlesex-London, please feel free to contact me directly. 1M, . Flaherty Enclosure .~< ",., .-",,-,~ .,.,·..",,-·,'··¿·"c ,'; ",:'<':":';~:;~' ~,'~":'-~">~ :''''"T, ..-.....;.:.'.,,-.'.'.: "." ".-:~ .-....-.._.~ .,:_ç ~ ~:. .T,"·· '::'.;':~; . .'.,.....-, ) August 16. 200 I Honourable James Wilson Minister of Ener!!\. Science and Technolo!!\ 41h Floor. Hearst ....Block '...d 900 Bay Street Toronto. ON M7A 2E1 Dear Minister: Please find enclosed a resolution from the Township of Middlesex Centre calling on your Government to regulate gas taxes for the benefit of the consumer. Considering the mounting frustration over the cost of gasoline prices both locally and nationally. I feel this is an issue that merits your prompt attention. Minister. as other pro\inces have regulated their gasoline taxes. such a suggestion for Ontario to follow suit appears to be both sound and reasonable. Such a regulation would unquestionably benefit the consumer. I would appreciate your looking into the matter. responding to the Township and forwarding a cop~ of your letter to my office. I thank you in advance for your time and consideration. Sincerely. Stew Peters. M.P.P. Elgin-Middlesex -London Cc: Township ofl\1iddlesex Centre . _ -. . -". ...,~- ~~.,.. . .....-.-...........-........---+ _....~-------_._-~--------,._.__.- . - _..'__ __.....-.-.-...----4n-~~--.~----------~-------'·~;... , ,~.. . -. .-.-' - .-,. -,...,,-~..,-- : .".'-.-..' ... ,~"'--;;~.,.~,,:,~-..~.,'~.~ ;:.,<;;~.~~J(;ftf;i~-~j~~i*~¡~ '-..-' - . . :',~ :_~_:."': ~~-~ -~~::'::'~'.,;,~...;_.- ;c-",,,'_'. ~"- . . -}--~ ·"-....'.....:.;.7_~~_...~.......~~· ,.,,,.";'-;.,:' À' ttI :: ¡( ./. " .;;. '" 11' A~Wl.h{~)a.;»~~~~Qf()n~J p.T··',',I'."··,,· .,', · II·, , , · ' , , , , ' . . . -.> . · - .. , ,. .' :-. ,':'--. '--;: 2···',,·',0··· ", ,0',·'··,'·,· 2'", ..' '" .. '" .. . . .. . .. - . . ., ... - - - . , ../":::.: .'::.,- .../ . ~. . "'. : -.".:... '-. . -' . AHO Confèrenœ ATTENTION: Heads of Council, Members of Council and Senior Municipal Staff Dear Municipal Colleague: Municipal government in Ontario has a good track record when it comes to planning and huilding for the future. 2003 will see some major changes with the implementation of a new Municipal Act - a significant piece of legislation that has been a long time coming. It will require a great deal of priority work and decision-making by municipalities. I can tell you that the 2002 AMO Annual Conference will equip you with infonnation and ideas that will help you to get ready for the some of the new Act's key legislative provisions such as licensing, user fees, service management boards and the tax tree option. I can also assure you that the conference will continue to profile new ways of doing municipal business while providing quality services, not the least ofwbich is water and waste water delivery. Topics will be timely, networking opportunities will be extensive and there will be significant opportunities to hear members of a new provincial cabinet and perhaps even the new Premier. With over a dozen workshops being planned and several policy discussion forums; delegates will get an incredible return on their registration investment. Early registration to the 2002 AMO Annual Conference ensures a spot is reserved for you - and early registration provides you with a conference you know to be an invaluable resource at a savings of over 30%. Enclosed you will find an AMO conference registration form. Please complete the registration form and return to AMO with payment to take full advantage of the savings. Reservations for accommodation at the Fainnont Royal York can be made as follows: National Reservations: Direct to hotel: Direct fax: Toll free 1-800-441-1414 416-863-6333 4 I 6-860-5008 Group Rate Code: CAM02 Make sure you register today! Yours very sincerely, &~ Ann Mulvale, AMO President \ \Amomainserver\d_MTIOpdc\ User\COIpOtô1t\AMOAnnua/Conferences\Conr-2002\Registration \president_1stRegJettec200Z wpd À'" ~: '" '" ... . '" .".."".".,. .. , :A~~~&.A~_;i~@~<$:~<~~ REGISTRATION FORM 2002 AMO Annual Conference August 18 - 21, 2002 - Royal York Hotel Toronto.Ontaño 2·,·,',:,·,···,··.',·.'.:'0, " ',:,·,o',y·",','2·',/,·,'",','.,',','.',' . '.. . .. - '" , ' .....f' --',::. : ",. ,;.;;. _ .-/"- _;:; AHO Comerenèe INSTRUCTIONS: Please type or print firmly. List your name as it should appear on your name badge. Use this form to register ONl V ONE delegate and ONE companion. This form CANNOT be processed unless accompanied wilh proper pa ment. DELEGATE: First Name: Last Name: Title: Municipality/Org. '" Address: City: Phone: { COMPANION: First Name: Province: Postal Code: Fax: I Email: Last Name: Earty Regular On-Site Fee(s) Earty Regular On-Site Fee(s) Early Regular On-Site Fee(s) Bird (¡""'""",,'" (AlJg.18-21. Enclosed Bird (¡""'",.""" (Aug.1tJ.21. Enclosed Bird (¡,."",.""" (Aug. 18-21. Enclosed -'" ,,~ 20021 -'" "'" 2002) """"",,'" .... 2002) GST A¡xi/19. Apt/ltg, AprI/19, Registration # prllXlodlld 2002 up la & pr/ot'to¥ld 2002up/p& prlcrtoi1l1d 2OO2upto& Including including lncludìng including InclUding including R106732944 Aprl119. Aug. 2.2002) Aprl/19. Aug. 2. 2002) Apri/19. Aug. 2. 2(02) 2002) 2002) 2002) FulJ Registration $ 414,,01 $463..44 $ 549,,95 .- $438.90 $ 485,,10 $ 583.28 s_ $ 519.06 $ 574.67 $ 698..26 .- Full Registration (no Banquet Ticket) $ 352.22 $ 401.65 $ 488.16 . $ 381.15 $ 427.35 $525.53 . $ 457.26 $ 512.88 $ 636.46 S One Day - Monday $ 210.09 $ 240,,99 $ 284,25 .- $ 219.45 $ 248,,33 $ 300.30 .- $ 259.53 $ 290..42 $ 352.22 .- One Day· Tuesday $ 210.09 $ 240,,99 $ 284,,25 .- $ 219..45 $ 248,,33 $ 300.30 .- $ 259.53 $ 290..42 $ 352,,22 .~ Half-day-Wednesday $111.23 $111.23 $111.23 .- $127.05 $127.05 $127.05 .- $154.48 $154.48 $154.48 .- Companion $154.48 $173.02 $ 203.92 .- $167.48 $184.80 $ 219.45 .- $ 203.92 $ 222.45 $ 259.53 .- includes ban uet Extra Banquet TIckets )x $85.00 .- )x $95.00 .- )x $105.00 .- Total Fee(s) Enclosed .- Total fee(s) Enclosed .- Total Fee(s) Enclosed s_ PAYMENT VOTING DELEGATES Registration forms CANNOT be processed unless accompanied with proper payment. ONLY PAYMENTS BY CREDIT CARD MA Y BE FAXED TO 416·971-9372 (to be completed ONL Y by municipally elected officials) )- declarations made on this form are final and CANNOT be changed )- ballot issued will be in accordance with declaration on this form LI - Cheque payable to: ASSOCIATION OF MUNICIPAlITIES OF ONTARIO 393 University Ave., Suite 1701 Toronto, Ontario M5G 1E6 My municipality is an AMO Member: [j-YES [j·NO I am an elected official in my municipality: [j ·YES [j -NO CREDIT CARD: j - VISA 0 - MasterCard j - American Express For voting purposes, Elected Officials need to declare choice of Caucus (pick one only). PRINT NAME: CARD #: EXPIRY DATE: SIGNATURE: LI - County Caucus [j - Northern Caucus LJ - Rural Caucus o - Toronto Caucus o - Large Urban Caucus o - Regional Caucus LJ - Small Urban Caucus REFUND POLICY: Cancellations must be requested in writing and received by AMO on or before August 2"",2002. An administration fee of $69.55 ($65 + GSn will appryto all refunds. REQUEST FOR REFUNDS WILL NOT BE ACWTIC AFTER AUGUST znd 2002. REGISTRATION INQUIRiES: Gwen Rideout 1·877·426·6527 EXi. 330. fmail: conference@amo.municðm.com \ \AMDMAfNSERVER\D_AMOPDC\USER\CORPORAnAMOANNUALCONFERENCESlCONF-2002\REGISTRATJON\AMO.REGFORM_2002.DOC Office of the Minister Bureau du ministre NÆ ,,- Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care Ministère de la Santé et des Soins de longue durée 10th Floor, Hepburn Block 80 Grosvenor Street Toronto ON M7A 2C4 Tel (416) 327-4300 Fax (416)326-1571 www.gov.on.calhealth 1 De étage, édifice Hepburn 80, rue Grosvenor Toronto ON M7A 2C4 Tél (416) 327-4300 Téléc (416) 326-1571 www.gov.on.calhealth Ilh-wfl Mr. Duncan McPhail Chair Western Ontario Wardens' Association 450 Sunset Drive St. Thomas ON N5R 5VI DEC 19 2001 Dear Mr. McPhail: The Honourable Chris Stockwell, Minister of Labour, forwarded to the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care, your letter and the Western Ontario Wardens' Association's resolution about the London-Middlesex ambulance service and labour negotiations. I apologize for the lengthy delay in responding. In your resolution, you propose that the ministry fund wage increases beyond 2 per cent that are awarded as a part of first contract arbitration. In February, 2000, Minister Stockwell announced that the government expects the broader public sector to follow the example set by the government with its own employees and negotiate reasonable collective agreements. This direction did not make an exemption for first contract arbitration and it is our position, therefore, that the ministry is only able to consider sharing the costs of wage increases up to 2 per cent, whether negotiated or arbitrated. I trust this information is helpful and I assure you that we look forward to working with you to ensure the provision of ambulance service for the citizens of London-Middlesex. c: Hon. Chris Stockwell, MPP ZOI-08298 7530-4658 1671-01 (01/04) Minister of Canadian Heritage Ministre du Patrimoine canadien Ottawa, Canada K1A OM5 JAN 1 7 2002 Mr. Duncan McPhail Warden COUNTY OF ELGIN 450 Sunset Drive St. Thomas, Ontario N5R5V1 .lâN 22 2002 Dear Mr. McPhail: I am pleased to inform you that I have approved a contribution up to a maximum of$127,708 to the County of Elgin under the Cultural Spaces Canada Program. The contribution is to defray part of the costs associated with the Elgin County Archives renovation project. This contribution is subject to the execution of an agreement which sets out the conditions under which the contribution will be released to you. Two originals of the Contribution Agreement will be sent to you in the corning weeks for your signature. We have every reason to be proud of the partnership we have built together. In this regard, I would expect you to emphasize, in your communication plans, the contribution that Canada has made toward your project. I also encourage you to do it publicly, whenever appropriate. . In expending these contribution monies, I am confident that you and your organization will assist in helping Canadians corne to a fuller awareness and appreciation of our country and citizenship, which remain the envy ofthe entire world. I would like to take this opportunity to wish you every success with your project. Yours sincerely, ~~ Sheila Copps Canadã Administrative Services Department Administration Building 450 Sunset Drive, St. Thomas, Ontario, N5R 5V1 Phone: (519) 631-1460 Ext.103 Fax: (519) 633-7661 County of Elgin Fax To: Dènnis Crevits From: Sandra Heffren, Deputy Clel1< E-Mail heffresj@elgin-county.on.ca December 3, 2001 2 Fax: Phone: Re: Date: Pages: cc: o Urgent o For Review o Please Comment o Please Reply o Please Recycle -Comments: Hi Dennis I believe the Tourist Association Board is meeting this week. Could you please present the following letter from the EDC to the group and ask the Board to let me know, in writing, if they have comments on it. Thanks, Sandy. ~~ ~/:;¡r THE INFORMATION IN THIS FACSIMILE IS INTENDED FOR THE NAMED RECIPIENT ONLY. IT MAY CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT IS PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL AND EXEMPT FROM DISCLOSURE UNDER APPLICABLE LAW. IF THE READER OF THIS MESSAGE IS NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, OR RESPONSIBLE FOR DELIVERING THE MESSAGE TO THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, ANY DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION OR COPYING OF THIS COMMUNICATION IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, OR THERE ARE ANY PROBLEMS IN TRANSMISSION, PLEASE NOTIFY US BY TELEPHONE. 7 / Bill Bryce, Director of Education and Secretory January 14, 2001 . Mark MacDonald Chief Administrator Elgin County Council 450 Sunset Drive Sf. Thomas, Ontario N5R 5Vl Dear Mark: We àre very pleased to have the opportunity to provide information about The Thij1I1es Valley Education Foundation at the Elgin County Council Meeting on Tuesday, January 22,2001 at 9:30 . . . .. , a.m. As discussed, we wm be providing a brief (10 minutes) awareneSS presentation on the newly created Foundation. Sandra Westaway wm be joinìng me. I am pleased to provide copies of our FoUndation brochure. ThaJ.Jk you for the opportunitYatl£l we look forward to being in. your Council Chambers next TueSday. . Sincerely>? ./ A772¿0. / ~L-- Rena M. Princis ' (519) 452-2392 Thomes Volley District School Board 1250 Dundòs Street, P.O. Box 5BB8, london,Ont¡ PublicAffoirs and Community RelatIons Deportment. N6A 511 Tel: (519) 452-2153 Fox: (519)452-2201 website: wwW.!vdsb.on.co "Our ~tudent$, Our Future"