February 27, 2014 MUNICIPALITY OF WEST ELGIN
AGENDA
COUNCIL MEETING
FEBRUARY 27, 2014
Council Chambers, West Elgin Municipal Building
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
MINUTES (Al —A7)
February 13, 2014 Council
BUSINESS ARISING FROM MINUTES
DELEGATIONS:
9:30.a.m. Public Meeting --Zoning Amendment—Lot 8, Concession 14 (131)
1:30 p.m. Pori Glasgow Trailer Park—2014 Budget (C9b)
(this portion of the meeting will be held in the Training Room, Rodney Fire Hall
adjacent to the municipal building)
PLANNING: (131-133)
1.* Report re: Zoning By-law Amendment— Lakewood Trailer Estates
2.* Report re: Proposed Severance - Lot 1, Concession 14 (McGill)
3. Verbal report re: Aldborough Public School site plan application
REPORTS: (C1-C10)
1. ROADS
2. RECREATION
i
February 27, 2014..........Page 2
3. WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
a) *Section 11 Annual Report
4. WASTEWATER
a) *Rodney WPCP — MOE Inspection Report
5. BUILDING
6. BY-LAW ENFORCEMENT
7. DRAINS
8. WEST ELGIN PRIMARY SYSTEM
9. ADMINISTRATION
a) *WESA— Draft Fall 2013 Monitoring Report
b) * 2014 Port Glasgow Trailer Park Budget
10. ACCOUNTS
CORRESPONDENCE: (131-1313)
1.* United Townships of Head, Clara & Maria — support of a resolution regarding site septic
system inspections;
2.* Town of Atikokan — Council resolution supporting the new police billing model;
3.* Town of Arnprior— request for support of a resolution regarding rate increases for
electricity;
4.* Lupus Foundation of Ontario —financial support for lupus research;
5.* Elgin County— Invitation of the Annual Wardens Charity Golf-Tournament;
RECOMMENDED TO ACCEPT & FILE:
6. AMO
• Watch file —February 16, 2014
• AMO — 2014 Federal Budget;
• Watch file —February 13, 2014;
• AMO — Prime Minister Announces Additional Building Canada Fund Details;
7. Ontario Farmland Trust - Invitation to seminar for Permanent Land Protection;
8. Ministry of Citizenship & Immigration — Nomination for Newcomer Champion Award;
February 27, 2014..........Page 3
9. Elgin County— Notice of Decision —Application # E 77113 — Ro er & Paul Lupsor;
10. Minutes of Marina Board of Management Meeting — January 309h, 2014;
11. Township of Greater Madawaska — Resolution regarding OPP proposed new billing
model;
12. 2014 OSUM Conference & Trade Show— invitation to the Town of Parry Sound;
13. Elgin County— Notice of Decision —Application # E 88/13 — Bradley & Susan Bandeen;
BY-LAWS:
By-law No. 2014-11 Zoning Amendment (Kopriva)
MINUTES (E)
NOTICE OF MOTION (F)
OTHER BUSINESS: (G1-G2)
1. Closed session — disposal of property
*Information enclosed
CONFIRMING BY-LAW
ADJOURNMENT
NEXT MEETINGS
March 13, 2014 Council
March 13, 2014 Tri-County Management Committee Special Meeting, 7:00 p.m.
March 18, 2014 Special Budget Meeting 9:30 a.m.
March 20, 2014 Special Budget Meeting, 9:00 a.m.
March 27, 2014 Council
Information will be gathered in accordance with the Municipal Freedom of Information and
Protection of Privacy Act(MFIPPA). All comments and communications received will become
part of the public record unless you expressly request the Municipality to remove it. Questions
about the collection of personal information may be directed to the Clerk.
41
MINUTES
OF THE CORPORATION OF THE
MUNICIPALITY OF WEST ELGIN
WEST ELGIN COUNCIL CHAMBERS
FEBRUARY 13,2014
PRESENT Mayor Bernie While, Deputy Mayor Mary Bodnar
Councillors Norm Miller, Dug Aldred, Richard Leatham
STAFF PRESENT Scott Gawley,Administrator/Treasurer
Norma Bryant, Clerk
Lee Gosnell, Public Works Superintendent
CALL TO ORDER
The Mayor called the meeting to order at 9:30 a.m.
DECLARATION OF PECUNIARY INTEREST
None declared
ADOPTION OF AGENDA
RES. NO. 1 Moved by Miller
Seconded by Leatham
RESOLVED that the Council of the Municipality of West Elgin
approves the agenda for February 13, 2014 as printed and
circulated with the following addition:
Notice of Public Consultation—Seaside Developments
DISPOSITION: Carried
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
RES. NO. 2 Moved by Bodnar
Seconded by Aldred
RESOLVED that the minutes of the meetings held on the following
dates be adopted as printed and circulated:
January 16,2014 Special Council
January 23, 2014 Council
DISPOSITION: Carried
BUSINESS ARISING FROM MINUTES
REPORTS
1. ROADS
a) Monthly Report
RES. NO. 3 Moved by Bodnar
Seconded by Leatham
RESOLVED that the January 2014 Roads Report be received.
DISPOSITION: Carried
February 13, 2014 .....Page 2 of 7
2. RECREATIONIEMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
3.WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
a) Monthly Reports for December 2013 and January 2014
RES. N0.4 Moved by Miller
Seconded by Bodnar
RESOLVED that the December 2013 and January 2014 Operations
Reports for the West Elgin Distribution System be received.
DISPOSITION: Carried
4.WASTEWATER
5. BUILDING
a Monthly Report
RES. NO. 5 Moved by Aldred
Seconded by Leatham
RESOLVED that the Building Report for January 2014 be received.
DISPOSITION: Carried
6. BY-LAW ENFORCEMENT
7. DRAINS
8. WEST ELGIN PRIMARY SYSTEM
9.ADMINISTRATION
a) Report--2013 Council Remuneration and Expenses
RES. NO. 6 Moved by Miller
Seconded by Bodnar
RESOLVED that the report from the Deputy Treasurer re: 2013
Council Remuneration and Expenses be received.
DISPOSITION: Carried
10. PLANNING
Mr. Halwa attended the Council meeting at 1:30 p.m.to discuss the new zoning
by-law. See below for comments.
11.ACCOUNTS
RES. NO. 7 Moved by Miller
Seconded by Bodnar
RESOLVED that the Mayor and Administrator/Treasurer are hereby
authorized to sign Payment Voucher#2 amounting to$426,649,08
in settlement of General, Road,Water, and Arena Accounts
(including cheques#16086-16221)
DISPOSITION: Carried
i
A-3
February 13, 2014 .....Page 3 of 7
CORRESPONDENCE:
1. Randy Pettapiece, MPP-Perth-Wellington—request for support of a
resolution on Joint and Several Liability
RES. NO. 8 Moved by Aldred
Seconded by Bodnar
RESOLVED that Council of the Municipality of West Elgin is in
support of a resolution put forth by Randy Pettaplece, MPP asking
the government to protect taxpayers from higher property taxes by
implementing a comprehensive, long-term solution to reform joint
and several liability insurance for municipalities by no later than
June 2014, addressing the alarming rise in insurance premiums due
to rising litigation and claim costs.
DISPOSITION: Carried
2. Aldborough Volunteer Parent Council—request to waive fees
RES. NO. 9 Moved by Miller
Seconded by Aldred
RESOLVED that the Council of the Municipality of West Elgin
authorize the waiving of rental fees for the use of the West Elgin
Recreation Centre on March 6,2014,2007 from 4:00 to 10:00 p.m.
for the Aldborough Volunteer Parent Movie/Fun Night fundraising
event.
DISPOSITION: Carried
3. Rodney&District Horticulture Society—requesting 2014 grant
4. M.P.o.W.E.R.—request for funding
5. Ken Gibson—Port Glasgow Trailer Park—removing $100.00 lakefront fee
6. M.P.o.W.E.R.—request for road closure July 12,2014
RES. NO. 10 Moved by Aldred
Seconded by Leatham
RESOLVED that Council of the Municipality of West Elgin supports
the request of the Cactus Cattle and Cowboys Committee to close
Furnival Road from Queen Street to Victoria Street on Saturday
July 12'", 2014 from 12:00 p.m.to 1:30 p.m.
DISPOSITION: Carried
7. Heritage Conservation Workshop—Invitation
8. Thames Valley District School Board—postpone of the school closures for
renovations
9. Rodney Horticulture Society—request for flower watering
10. Thames Valley District School Board—Special Olympics--invitation
11. AMO—OPP Policed Communities: Update 1
12. AMO—Recent Developments in Joint and Several Liability—Municipal
Action Needed
A4
February 13, 2014 .....Page 4 of 7
RES. NO. 11 Moved by Leatham
Seconded by Miller
RESOLVED that Council of the Municipality of West Elgin is in
support of sending a letter to the Attorney General regarding the
impact of joint and several liability on municipalities.
DISPOSITION: Carried
13. AMO
• Watch file--January 23,2014
• Watch file—January 30, 2014
• Highlights of January, 2014 Board Meeting
• AMO President's letter to OPP Policing Municipalities
• 2014 LAS Town Hall Information Sessions
14, Elgin County—Application#E 76113(Fleming) no appeal
15. Municipal Employer Pension Centre—2012 Annual Report
16, 2014 Ontario Senior of the Year Award
17. Greenstone—copy of resolution opposing requalification of Municipal
Building Officials
18. County of Lambton—resolution opposing the requalification of Municipal
Building Officials
19. Tillsonburg—Council Resolution—OPP billing model resolution
20. Notice of Public Consultation Session—Seaside Development—Port
Glasgow
RES. NO. 12 Moved by Leatham
Seconded by Aldred
RESOLVED that the above correspondence items numbered 3,4,
5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13-20 be received and filed.
DISPOSITION: Carried
BY-LAWS
1. By-Law No. 2014-09—Interim Tax Lew
RES. NO.13 Moved by Bodnar
Seconded by Aldred
RESOLVED that the mover be granted leave to introduce a By-Law
to provide for an interim tax levy for the year 2014 and this shall be
the first and second reading and provisional adoption thereof.
DISPOSITION: CARRIED
RES. NO. 14 Moved by Miller
Seconded by Leatham
RESOLVED that a By-law to provide for an interim tax levy for the
year 2014 be now read a third time and finally passed,signed,
sealed and numbered By-law Number 2014-08—Interim Tax Levy
DISPOSITION: Carried
J
February 13, 2014 .....Page 5 of 7
2. By-law No. 2014-09—Discharge of Lien
RES. NO. 15 Moved by Miller
Seconded by Leatham
RESOLVED that the mover be granted leave to introduce a By-Law
to authorize the discharge of a lien and this shall be the first and
second reading and provisional adoption thereof.
DISPOSITION: Carried
RES, NO. 16 Moved by Bodnar
Seconded by Aldred
RESOLVED that a By-law to authorize the discharge of a lien be
now read a third time and finally passed, signed, sealed and
numbered By-law Number 2014-09—Discharge of Lien (217
Argyle)
DISPOSITION: Carried
MINUTES
RES. NO. 17 Moved by Aldred
Seconded by Leatham
RESOLVED that the minutes of the following committee meetings
be received:
West Elgin Arena Board Minutes—December 10,2013
Four Counties Transportation Services—December 10, 2013
Tri County Management Committee—Special Meeting—December
17,2013
West Elgin Arena Board—January 14, 2014
West Elgin Chamber of Commerce Business Meeting—January 14,
2014
DISPOSITION: Carried
OTHER BUSINESS
1. Council Announcements
• Next Neighbourhood Watch meeting on March 3`d, 7 p.m. at Rodney Legion
• March 5th—Joint Horticultural meeting between Rodney,West Lorne and
Dutton, 7 p.m. at West Lorne Legion—topic Whistling Gardens
• Chilli Cook-off—judged by Mayor Wiehle, Councillor Miller and John
Johnston—3 entries,winner Optimist Club
• Chamber of Commerce meeting on January 14th—enquiries about priorities
in budget regarding streetscape, sidewalks
• County of Elgin budget for 2014 adopted
• Graham Road in budget—need to discuss"hump"—will be West Elgin
responsibility to lower and county will pave and gutter
• Good turnout for wrestling fundraiser, raised $9,000.
CLOSED SESSION
RES. NO. 18 Moved by Aldred
Seconded by Miller
RESOLVED that the Council of the Municipality of West Elgin
adjourn to a closed session to discuss:
• Litigation or potential litigation (M.A.s.239(2)(e)
DISPOSITION: Carried
February 13, 2414 .....Page$of 7
RES. NO.19 Moved by Miller
Seconded by Leatham
RESOLVED that the Council of the Municipality of West Elgin do
now rise and report
DISPOSITION: Carried
RISE AND REPORT
Mayor reported that a report on potential litigation has been received.
DELEGATIONS
11:30 a.m. West Elgin Nature Club—policy for roadside mowing
In attendance: Stan Caveney, Chris Leys, Bill Prieksaitis, Public Works
Superintendent, 12 ratepayers.
Mr. Caveney presented a document which identified a problem with timing of
roadside mowing and included 6 recommendations for Council to consider. It
was suggested that Gray Line be used as a pilot project
Comments:
• Have the farmers been approached about cutting close to drainage ditches?
• Is there a financial benefit to cutting every other year? How do we address
the ratepayers that ask we are letting the weeds to growl
• Need for a written policy so understood by all
• Need to set up bee gardens
• Need to educate entire community about issue and not cut road allowances
in front of their property.
RES. NO. 20 Moved by Leatham
Seconded by Bodnar
RESOLVED that Council appoint the Public Works Superintendent,
Administrator and Councillor Miller to meet with the Nature Club to
bring forward a workable policy for roadside mowing.
DISPOSITION: Carried
1:30 p.m. Planner Ted Halwa—new draft zoning by-law
Mr. Halwa referred to page 29 of Volume 1 and reviewed the different zones.
Severed lots will be zoned A3. There was discussion regarding the sizes of an
A3 zone versus an RR zone. Staff to review maps and provide reports on lots
affected by changes in designation. Cemeteries refer to active cemeteries. Mr.
Halwa presented a draft zoning schedule(Map 29)showing the Conservation
Authority regulatory lines which include drains, ravines,wetlands. It was decided
to show the regulatory line along Lake Erie and Thames River only.
Questions regarding the zoning maps were addressed by the Planner.
Discussion was held regarding the size of an A3 zone, Councillor Aldred referred
to page H-6. Should 1.5 acres be the minimum?
Discussion was held regarding the minimum size of an Al zone. It was agreed
that 19 ha, not 40 ha, be the minimum.
The next meeting was scheduled for March 27th at 1:30 p.m. Requested changes
would be made to the documents for Council to review. At that meeting, an Open
Al
February 13, 2014 .....Page 7 of 7
House and Public Meeting will be scheduled. Documents will be available for
public review at the libraries, office and on the web.
CONFIRMING BY-LAW
RES. NO.20 Moved by Leatham
Seconded by Miller
RESOLVED that the mover be granted leave to introduce a By-Law
to confirm the proceedings of the meeting held on February 13th
2014 and this shall be the first and second reading and provisional
adoption thereof
DISPOSITION: Carried
RES. NO.21 Moved by Aldred
Seconded by Bodnar
RESOLVED that a By-law to confirm the proceedings of the
meeting held on February 13th,2014 be now read a third time and
finally passed, signed,sealed and numbered By-law Number 2014-
10- Confirming By-law February 13 2014
DISPOSITION: Carried
ADJOURNMENT
RES. NO.22 Moved by Bodnar
Seconded by Aldred
RESOLVED that this Regular Meeting of Council shall adjourn at
3:28 p.m.to meet again for a special meeting on February 27,
2014.
DISPOSITION: Carried
These minutes were adopted on the 27th day of February, 2014
Mayor Clerk
MUNICIPALITY OF WEST ELGIN "
NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING
ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT
Lakewood Trailer Estates Inc. (P-112014)
Part of Lot 8, Concession XIV
DATE&TIME: 9:30 a.m.Thursday, February 27", 2014.
LOCATION: West Elgin Municipal Building -22413 Hoskins Line north of the Village of Rodney.
PURPOSE: To consider a proposed amendment to the Zoning By-law to permit the expansion of a
long-established trailer park for passive recreational purposes.
The proposed amendment would change the zoning of undeveloped lands situated on the south side of Gray Line
east of the Hamlet of Port Glasgow, comprising part of Lot 8, Concession XIV, from the 'site-specific' Lakeshore
Residential — Holding (LR-1-H) Zone to the Trailer Park (TP) Zone. The amendment would fulfill a condition
imposed by the County of Elgin Land Division Committee in granting Application for Consent E128113 to enlarge
Lakewood Trailer Estates through the conveyance of abutting undeveloped lands.
The lands proposed to be re-zoned to Trailer Park (TP)comprise an area of 9.2 hectares (22.8 acres), a frontage
of 336.6 metres (1,104 ft) on Gray Line and an irregular depth. The parcel is without buildings or structures and
has been left primarily in its natural state. The lands are to be merged in the same name and title as abutting
lands to the west, being the location of the long established Lakewood Trailer Park. The additional lands are to be
used for passive recreational purposes associated with the Trailer Park, namely, walking trails and shoreline
access to Lake Erie.
Permitted uses of the Trailer Park (TP) Zone include a campground or trailer park and a dwelling unit or single
unit detached dwelling as an accessory use. In this instance, no additional camp sites are proposed.
The subject lands are designated `Agricultural Area' in the County of Elgin Official Plan and are designated
`Lakeshore Area' in the West Elgin Official Plan. The proposed amendment is considered to be in conformity
with both official plans.
ANY PERSON may attend the public meeting and/or make a written or verbal representation either in support of, or in
opposition to, the proposed amendment. IF A PERSON OR PUBLIC BODY that files an appeal of a decision of the Council of
the Corporation of the Municipality of West Elgin in respect of the proposed zoning by-law does not make oral submissions at
a public meeting or make written submissions to the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of West Elgin before the
proposed zoning by-law is adopted, the Ontario Municipal Board may dismiss all or part of the appeal. ADDITIONAL
INFORMATION relating to the proposed amendment is available between 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. at the Municipal Office or
from the Municipal Planner, Mr. Ted Halwa, at(519) 686-1300(London, Ontario). THE information and material required under
Sections 34(10.1)and 34(10.2) of the Planning Act have been provided and this shall serve as sufficient notice of same under
Section 34(90.4)of the Act.
DATED AT RODNEY this 4'" day of February, 2014.
Municipality of West Elgin
22413 Hoskins Line
P.O. Box 490
Rodney, Ontario
NOL 2CO
Norma Bryant tl Telephone: (519) 785-0560
Clerk Fax: (519) 785-0644
Email: nbryant @westelgin.net
ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT
Lakewood Trailer Estates Inc. (Wendie Dupuis)
Gray Line Municipality of
Pt Lot 8, Concession XIV WEST ELGIN
Municipality of West Elgin KEY MAP
BF
BEATTIE LIN ZONING
FLEMIIVG LINE A9 AGRICULTURAL
LR LAKESHORE RESIDENTIAL
O TP TRAILER PARK
I �
GI68 LINE ZO 336.Bm(1,104R) QRAYLINE
N
it F'N RES 11111,111NIX11 V
Clac[ban JOHNSTON LINE G 2 L 7 £ Lp7 8
9.2 ha
A B 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1U 11 f2 (22.8 ac)
Ili W
MCLEAN LINE Lakew 1 11 rFsta I
IV
KINTYRE LINE O
U z
g w
v MCDOUGALL LINE e
HWY 401 m
VI `O
HOSKINS LINE
VI 8e VII Ai Phato 20ad
DOWNIE LINE
103 LANDS PROPOSED TO BE RE-ZONED w
FROM'SITE-SPECIFIC'LAKESHORE 1:6,000 .
VII Rodney RESIDENTIAL-HOLDING(LR-1-H)TO s F
MCMILLAN LINE QUEEN TRAILER PARK(TP) Meters
10 0 2550 100
vu1 West Lorne
PIONEER LINE
2
0
X B C D 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
= MARSH LINE
f x
Y16 Q I HOMSON LINE
d
o x
0
z XI SILVER CLAY LINE
U X C9
X!I New
Glasgow 3 Eagle TALB07 LINE
IX: SUBJECT LANDS
Pig GRAY LINE
Glasgow
LAKE ERIE
9:100,000
3,000 1,500 0 3,000 Metres 8,
Monteith Brown 1P
plan n rrjg.don'su Rents
610 Princess Avenue
London, ON N613 2B9
Tel: (519)686-1300
Fax: (519)681-1690
M ilfl � �B �Df!il E-Mail: mbpcOmbpc.ca
r��arit-r�riCr Esr��isu'ttan3 Web: www.mbpc.ca
25 February 2014
MEMORANDUM #13-2285
TO: Members of Council
Municipality of West Elgin
FROM: Ted Halwa
SUBJ: Public Meeting — February 27th, 2074 - Amendment to the Zoning By-law — Lakewood
Trailer Estates Inc. (Wendle Dupuis)--Part of Lot 8, Concession XIV
The purpose of the public meeting is to consider a proposed amendment to the Zoning By-law with
respect to the abovenoted lands to fulfill a condition imposed by the Elgin County Land Division
Committee in granting a related Application for Consent (E 128113) on August 28th, 2013 for the purposes
of enlarging Lakewood Trailer Estates by the conveyance of abutting undeveloped lands.
The subject lands, being 9.2 ha (22.8 acres) in area, abut the trailer park along its easterly boundary and
are primarily in a natural state and are devoid of any buildings or structures. Two natural watercourses
(the easterly most being Ox Creek) meander through the parcel before joining as one and emptying into
Lake Erie. The lands have been used used for passive recreational purposes i.e. walking trails and to
provide access to Lake Erie. The owners are proposing a rezoning of the parcel from its current 'site-
specific' Lakeshore Residential— Holding (LR-1-H)Zone to Trailer Park(TP).
The owner has not submitted plans, at least as yet, to establish additional trailer sites on the subject lands
area. In the event this is proposed, site plan control would apply and various supporting technical studies
would be required. Under the Planning Act, developments subject to site plan control includes the laying
out of three or more trailer sites. A site plan agreement would be required.
Portions of the subject lands have been identified as 'Woodlands' in the West Elgin Official Plan and the
County of Elgin Official Plan. Whether they constitute 'significant' woodlands has not been determined.
Development and site alteration are not permitted in 'significant' woodlands unless it is demonstrated
(usually in the form of a professionally prepared study) that there will be no negative impacts on the
woodland and its function (Section D1.2.3). Under the County Official Plan a determination of significance
is contingent on a natural heritage system being established by the County(Section D1.2.4).
The Ministry of Municipal Affairs has recently (February 24, 2014) forwarded comments to us via email
from the Ministry of Natural Resources (February 21, 2014). MNR questions the need for the re-zoning
Lakewood Trailer Estates MONTEITH BROWN PLANNING CONSULTANTS
25 February 2014
page 2
and did not consider the transfer of land to the abutting trailer park as constituting a "minor boundary
adjustment" notwithstanding that the consent was ultimately granted by the Elgin Land Division
Committee. MNR is concerned that under the Trailer Park (TP) zoning proposed, the owner could
proceed with the development of additional trailer sites even though the expressed intent is not to do so
at this time.
Although the lands are designated 'Agricultural Area' in the County of Elgin Official Plan, the Plan
recognizes that certain lands outside settlement areas have been designated for non-agricultural
development by lower tier official plans and these lands are deemed not to be in the prime agricultural
area but rather are subject to the relevant policies of the County Plan and policies of the lower tier plan.
The subject lands lie in the 'Lakeshore Area' of the West Elgin Official Plan. Campgrounds and trailer
parks are permitted and criteria established for evaluating proposals for new development and
expansions to existing development (Section 7.10). The proposed re-zoning is considered to be
consistent with the FPS and in conformity with both official plans. A reference plan (survey) has been
prepared and deposited with the Land Registrar.
In the interim, a 'site-specific' (i.e. TP-#)zoning along with a "H' symbol would seem to be the best course
of action to restrict the permitted uses of the subject lands to those of a passive recreational nature (e.g.
nature trails) pending the preparation, submission and approval of the necessary plans and studies.
(original signed by)
Ted L. Halwa, MCIP, RPP
610 Princess Avenue
London, ON N613 2B9
Tel: (519)686-1300
Fax: (519)681-1690
IUlt til Bi h'►B�'O n. E-Mail: mboc(&[Dboc.ca
tilSrirti'na'cort ,lYants Web: www.mbec.ca
PLANNING REPORT- PRE-APPLICATION: Municipality of West Elgin
Proposed Severance: Patsy& Mark McGill, Part of Lot 1, Con XIV February 24,2014
E y Patsy& Mark McGill
r Part Lot 1, Concession XIV
To sever a rectangularly shaped parcel from a larger,. irregularly shaped parcel for the purposes of
' creating a residential building lot.
`k Aria(rn.)`' Frontage(mj ;Depth (m),
Area& Dimensions: 3,170 sq m (0.8 ac) 32 m (105 ft) 99 m (325 ft)
Existing Buildings: none
• single unit detached dwelling proposed
" Other: • connection to municipal piped water supply available
• private, on-site sanitary waste disposal system required
new entrance to Gray Line required
Area, m( : Franta e, m
_. ..
Area & Dimensions: 15.5 hectares 38.4 ac) 427 m (1,400 ft) irregular
43 trailer sites and accessory buildings associated with Leisure Heights Trailer
Existing Buildings: park owned and operated by the applicants
Other: • no change in use proposed
• owners currently reside in a double-wide mobile home on a separate
lot(21105 Gray Line) created by a previous owner. The owners intend
i to re-locate to a new dwelling on the lands being conveyed
• a significant portion of the parcel is in cash-crop,
Planning Act no issues of Provincial interest apparent [Section 2], Criteria for plans
of subdivision/consents capable of being satisfied [Section 51(24)].
• creation of residential building lots not permitted in `prime agricultural
areas', although in this instance the subject lands are in a non-
PPS 2005 ✓ agricultural designation and the loss of prime agricultural land not at
Issue
•
application considered "consistent with" PPS
Page 1 of 3
Planning Report- Pre-Application: Municipality of West Elgin
Proposed Severance: Patsy& Mark McGill
24 February 2014
Designation: . 'Agricultural Area'
• the Plan states: It is recognized that certain
lands outside of settlement areas have been
designated for non-agricultural development by
the lower tier Official Plans and these lands
are deemed to not be within the prime
County Official Plan ✓ agricultural area and are instead subject to the
Policies: relevant policies of this Plan and the policies of
the lower tier Official Plan (Section C2.2)
• proposed severance capable of satisfying the
general consent criteria (Section E1.2.3.1)
• conformity capable of being maintained.
Designation: • 'Lakeshore Area'
+ proposed residential lot lies outside 'Hazardous
Lands', and any natural heritage feature
• proposed lot lies above and outside 'Regulated
West Elgin Official ✓ area' (LTVCA) associated with Lake Erie
Plan
Policies: • year round residential development permitted
• creation of lots permitted subject to Section 7.9
and Section 7.10)
• conformity capable of being maintained.
• lands proposed to be conveyed (i.e. proposed building lot) would require a
re-zoning from 'site-specific' Trailer Park - Holding (TP-1-H) to Lakeshore
Residential (LR)
Zoning By-law • minimum lot area and minimum frontage requirements (1500 m2 and 30 m
respectively) satisfied.
• lands proposed to be retained zoned Trailer Park - Holding (TP-1-H) and
TP-1. No change in zoning required. Proposed to be zoned RVP in new
Zoning By-law.
• proposed consent would result in the creation of a residential lot in a non-agricultural
Other land use designation where limited opportunities still exist for development
• loss of productive agricultural land not at issue.
Page 2 of 3
Planning Report-Pre-Application: Municipality of West Elgin
Proposed Severance: Patsy& Mark McGill
24 February 2014
That the proposed consent by Patsy & Mark McGill be supported subject to the following conditions and the
Elgin Land Division Committee advised accordingly.
® e s
i. That a connection to the municipal piped water supply is provided to the satisfaction of the Municipality;
ii. That the proposed building lot is able to support independent, on-site sanitary waste disposal system to the
satisfaction of the Municipality;
iii. That the location and design of an entrance to Gray Line is designed and constructed to the satisfaction of the
Municipality;
iv. That the lands being conveyed be re-zoned Lakeshore Residential (LR),
e
i. Consistency with the Provincial Policy Statement would be maintained.
ii. Conformity with the County of Elgin Official Plan would be maintained.
iii. Conformity with the West Elgin Official Plan would be maintained.
iv. The requirements of the Zoning By-law are capable of being satisfied.
V. The matters set out in the Planning Act would be satisfied.
(original signed by)
Ted L. Halwa, MCIP, RPP,
Page 3 of 3
APPLICOON
.. .
M.UrilcipaUty, Of
Wesl Elgin I r
fit,}rL}
kk
•
/j;� {{;�� I
TIP -. - .._ + s �„w7r+la� h, a _ 1-6;%' d`?a3,s k.�. 'r?? 't r�`r _,,r c..e x"-".,r.S'
1dy
I ; -r ap-r r� lrf�J� f(la; xt€���}5" r4-.ii"kS : r.1 �x 1 I I-.;�Ixr "4S xp} y jY z} t f r .�
-11-11 ns I�lFRrr ?S�SI,rr1Sle`�ti Rri c 1 = ti Sf ?3nc1n7 at4llft1
{ !° C�.�'y) �t 3'd �5. `! y t�. � 7 r i x h� _ 'Pr r u� r"1 - .' 3}I{' a ? _f
y (8')- �,s'J ty� y,�'•G'"S J 4 Y r 3IF!S _ tR y 4 y 1 c
fl f X35 V Y 5 /� � -1l'� 4 -� 1 4
r��y� - i':_ ,kr'.'t S tt a '�`a t G k rh,'`ii i j t ' . { { rr
r< 1 t 4,,.,Is� e r , ?_ _
3 I.r /'`! ply..a-r LL 1�<�' t H`;{,1r , s o a. s -r i is
c,.A L' y ��, w f i r _
F✓S } • r ury w� � ,�s�� ,'c �.,s s h < r i 1 i'
- q_,' % `!``� ! � 1 0 pi r ,,' 1 7�r i G��1.ti fir'f I 1 ti ° 1 y
�°
ii�if �� �� I I 1J3 t' ss } 5 -SSt'1}I 'F�I'- tk ( - f 6 y
{ �y}�rrY�,� Sr r+ 4s lf,,�a a7 } t r �" Sya'ctl; LyF'S Yk "tS r(S s. r S- . . r
E J f i n ,711 y f- s } 1S s E
;,r i y�J . w. c t ,t; t 1 r�o "t ,
h
r
' -
J e! sc chi ar t o u kTEiS );s ^ 'Is z
I r"".4.1 hrt 1 ar P t:;.I c LW.J LI 1 a r r t F 'ig p 0 .r4 r- �' p Y
} _ �i 1 YX y E y r _' 1 '� s s Ix a 1 Ir 51)x��� n! n !) t > d '11 =i� 6 g c v - r �r}��,��r� 1 µry;py""i I <�.Jr r t S 1 1' i 3 ", ,,r,..-,:
3 s J
h� -rs _ / ;r a r';{n•x.�.�1,-l� 't �Y Jzr r� [�� c�t�r S $ 1-, r 4 1 1 ,I
E 7i._rr IS Ar .t - °y I'll p s _ >. 3r+ r.-,.rW-4'%'k.f ) ' r'_sr 1 1 _
I il" 1 rr t° [ r r c �YT ,I '° "�le' S.'—"-'J "r'�rfr a'i,# �' I--7.sr,"s l['�' 1 �1 e 1 r l
t -�J ,� 7 u;1 a r� �-1 u I j any t ,, t }�rl 1sY >tv 1 k 7 I
- ? �rf 1 $sl u! sft; r Ld �)a'K;�0� tr- ssnhj;i rt r�rl 1 ' r 1
!r a f 7 ril l N. 4 r t=1} D <� 1 { r s --i
�r1 n > �1r,fk lam-{�"' �yFlr') Ir'
z 1 y-vlu r �• rr}r ti F r 'T"X : t ,� �� /I -{
1 - i ss�'r J i� r �- r' IF,fi�v f d',Ifa 5'} ,m rl li s 1 1 1 S r I
I: "pl " r°t �F {. a ttl- r F' §s�! r-, ri 4 5 Z - ;1 Im E ` 1 _' 3 "r�a'r' Zi }: 2 r cr �fil r' i ,�}) t -+{ s ��Il. 1 ' h • r' �; a ti er=t 1 3 f t °F i 1 ' r -
f ! yi, ljF I i t / a of fl3f Sr v: s T } `1 1.�� r�c 1"kr l sir a a t }c �' �+FI i ty)Sri f' i'i ! ti4 I -S 1 59 4..ty t r - -�
1 •l pia kr �,f5-s y{[i-. ' - {5S{( s5 sr a Y#1/izr S r ],5�7{ 1 r I
f _ I l t i�. Y.'lt -�({Y� t` yf! ;3 �'�A (5 1(f f,U k 11 '�I
E r - IG ! , r ,iP IS rs t" --, e r !VI 1 r 1 s I ;{
�'•,- 3 _i
i
4 - m;l r. .
{ I�t',;tar 9 a ,I r
i1 q�G-�� i t 4 g3 i {p}
€ r c-',iy.F L 11 2.__ i'\:
f cy Tf, ' _ r r.
` 0
a:i i a a, r �"�' _,
" s fl
!Jii 1
t 9 t 1 ' r
_�� ?
�a
1,I j 3 ` Q :
i
.
�r :� r "s 1. }
` y`
�iJ � 41
r r tk ! (ad r�+ ry/�1v1 r 1 q Y j
`r » s�R�t s r�i�'tq�+.k 5s r
' 1 r-.e r Fiacr "Wry $�vAl'-" � j t �'R I 1rfi ," - :J
1 I t t r +tee},3�" i� x_, '" I'17 _t st 3� a I 's . ,ir?�4
s I I1. "� L 7 t �' s ht ',Ar l; ''ei 1 -aa��i4S lwi� 3t,,rl 3 --il,-k�;'
r r r p a it- --..t Z 1 1 1 r I- zt3"+h rr � 'zl sn'_ r JYb`Lr .E 5 txf�, Sfli �rl �S,t-'��t}L.er r 1 'ti Ito �:' ,9,F wy, 5 v J* Ir n -rIS' N m' t Y L 1r 1 n ! �'�. i�`Ef
1 r i el 1 c '9 9 h -f r ,r�'rt err a r• r,hr�'� s�� a iLr,J arFa '-"Ft' 'r,, „�, �'r,Y<^`�,Lyrk. 'hl-'�
f, � m;r r r Ir 1 r-is 1 1.S a 5 R { arm` r r
�• e y � `
f l;.ilf 17. 4 f t �
....-. 1 -
. . 0- LANDS B n CONVEYED
4-..
.
Ili
—'' TO BE RETAINED III w www= -
1 1 75 100
fir ontarb Drinking-Water Systems Regulation O. Reg. 170103
ANNUAL REPORT
Drinking-Water System Number: 260091117
Drinking-Water System Name: West Elgin Drinking Water System
Drinking-Water System Owner: Corporation of the Municipality of West Elgin
Drinking-Water System Category: Large Municipal Residential
Period being reported: January I"to December 315, 2013
Complete if your Category is Large Municipal Complete for all other Categories.
Residential or Small Municipal Residential
Does your Drinking-Water System serve Number of Designated Facilities served:
more than 10,000 people? Yes [ ] No [X]
Is your annual report available to the public Did you provide a copy of your annual
at no charge on a web site on the Internet? report to all Designated Facilities you
Yes [X] No [ ] serve?
Yes [ ] No [ ]
Location where Summary Report required
under O. Reg. 170103 Schedule 22 will be Number of Interested Authorities you
available for inspection. report to:
West Elgin Municipal Office
22413 Hoskins Line Did you provide a copy of your annual
Rodney, ON NOL 2C0 report to all Interested Authorities you
report to for each Designated Facility?
Yes [ ] No [ ]
List all Drinking-Water Systems (if any),which receive all of their drinking water from
ours stem:
Drinkin Water System Name Drinking Water System Number
Southwest Middlesex Distribution S stem 260005502
Did you provide a copy of your annual report to all Drinking-Water System owners that
are connected to you and to whom you provide all of its drinking water?
Yes [X] No [ ]
Drinking Water Systems Regulations Page 1 of 7
(PIBS 4435e01)December 2011
Ur Ontario Drinking-Water Systems Regulation O. Reg, 170103
Indicate how you notified system users that your annual report is available, and is free of
charge.
[X] Public access/notice via the web
[X] Public access/notice via Government Office
[ ] Public access/notice via a newspaper
[X] Public access/notice via Public Request
[ ] Public access/notice via a Public Library
[ ] Public access/notice via other method
Describe your Drinking-Water System
The West Elgin Water Treatment Plant is a membrane filtration surface water treatment
facility with a total design capacity of 12,160m3/day, located at 9210 Graham Road in the
Municipality of West Elgin. The low lift pumping station is located south of the Water
Treatment Plant at 8662 Graham Road, on the shores of Lake Erie.
The water treatment facility consists of an intake system, a low lift pumping station, a
treatment system and distribution pumping system that supplies water to the following
secondary distribution systems: West Elgin, Dutton-Dunwich, Southwest Middlesex,
Newbury, and Bothwell.
Intake
The intake consists of one 700mm diameter polyethylene pipe extending approximately
610m into Lake Erie at a depth of 5.7m. A zebra mussel chemical control system is used
seasonally. There is a second intake located at the shoreline,this is used only as a backup if
required due to water quality or a blockage. The raw water is screened by two coarse
screens.
Low Lift Pumping Station
Raw water is pumped from the low lift wet wells by four low Iift pumps to the Water
Treatment Plant.
Treatment Plant
Filtration
At the water treatment plant the water is pre-filtered by four automatic strainers to protect the
filter membranes from coarser particles and algae in the raw water.
After the water has been strained it enters the membrane filtration system which removes fine
particles, sediment, algae, protozoa and bacteria. Filtered water can be directed through the
UV advanced oxidation process (AOP)unit to the treated water storage tanks.
Drinking Water Systems Regulations Page 2 of 7
(FIBS 4435e01)December 2011
(� OntariO Drinking-Water Systems Regulation O. Reg. 170103
Disinfection
Disinfection is achieved by the use of sodium hypochlorite for primary disinfection. Note
that UV is intended for use with hydrogen peroxide(AOP) for taste and odour control. The
treated water is stored in treated water storage tanks where it is pumped into the distribution
network by the High Lift pumps. Post chlorination of the treated water is done at two points.
The first dosing point is upstream of the Treated Water Storage Tanks and the second dosing
point is downstream of the four High Lift Pumps before the distribution header.
Process Drain Water
Waste water from the floor drains and online analyzers are directed to the process water
handling facilities that include a settling basin and constructed wetlands. Flush water that
cleans the pre-strainers and the membranes is also sent to the process water handling
facilities.
Monitor and Control
The water treatment process and distribution components are controlled by a dedicated
Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition(SCADA) computer system and monitored by
certified operators.
Standby Power
Two diesel generators are available to permit the treatment plant to remain in operation
should a power failure occur.
Distribution
The West Elgin WTP serves several communities. The primary transmission line from the
WTP ends at the West Lorne Standpipe. Included in the distribution system is the Iona Re-
Chlorination Station. The West Lorne Standpipe and Iona Re-chlorination Station are
controlled and monitored from the WTP via SCADA.
The West Elgin Water Distribution System consists of various size and types of watermains
in the village of West Lorne, Rodney and rural West EIgin. There are auto flushers situated
throughout the distribution system to maintain chlorine residuals.
List all water treatment chemicals used over this reporting eriod
Chlorine Gas
Sodium Hypochlorite 12%
Hydrogen Peroxide 50%
Citric Acid 50%*
Caustic Soda 50%*
Sodium Bisulphite 38%*
*used in the cleaning process of the membranes
Drinking Water Systems Regulations Page 3 of 7
(PIBS 4435e01)December 2011
�i ontariO Drinking-Water Systems Regulation O. Reg. 170103
Were any significant expenses incurred to?
[X] Install required equipment
[X] Repair required equipment
[X] Replace required equipment
Please provide a brief description and a breakdown of monetary expenses incurred
-Compressor repairs ($3,843)
-Replace solenoids on flow control valve ($796)
-Repair kit for actuator valve($316)
-Repair high lift pump ($1,906)
-Repair flow control valve($5,326)
-Repair main WTP generator($8,624)
-Repair air release valve ($304)
-Repair turbidity meter($411)
-Replace neutralization tank pH probe ($800)
-Repair pinhole leaks on stainless steel piping($3,000)
-Replace gas chlorine equipment($15,000)
-Repair high lift pump motor mounts ($3,000)
-Hydrant steamer($1,700)
-Hydrant maintenance ($5,000)
-Replace check valve on Pioneer Line ($2,340)
-Watermain repair/maintenance($12,400)
-Replace 4"water meter($3,400)
-Rodney Tower Engineering Report on Disinfection Residuals($15,000)
-Rodney Tower building maintenance ($4,700)
Provide details on the notices submitted in accordance with subsection 18(1) of the Safe
Drinking-Water Act or section 16-4 of Schedule 16 of O.Reg.170/03 and reported to
Spills Action Centre
Incident Parameter Result Unit of Corrective Corrective
Date I Measure Action Action Date
n/a I n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
Microbiological testing done under the Schedule 10, 11 or 12 of Regulation 170103,
Buring this rep rting period.
Range of E.Coli Range of Total
Number Or Fecal Coliform Number Range of HPC
of Results Results of HPC Results
Samples (min#)-(max#) (min#)-(max#) Samples (min#)-(max##)
Raw 52 0-560 0-6200 n/a n/a
Treated 53 0-0 0-0 53 <10-240
Distribution 408 0-0 0-0 111 <10->2000
Drinking Water Systems Regulations Page 4 of 7
(PIBS 4435e01)December 2011
1' ontarb Drinking-Water Systems Regulation O. Reg. 170103
Operational testing done under Schedule 7,8 or 9 of Regulation 170103 during the
eriod covered by this Annual Report.
Number of Grab Range of Results Unit of NOTE: For
Samples min#)-(max# Measure
Turbidity(Rack 1) 8760 0.01 -0.99 ntu continuous
monitors use 8760
Turbidity(Rack 2) 8760 0.01 -0.43 ntu as the number of
Turbidity(Rack 3) 8760 0.01 -0.58 ntu samples.
Turbidity(Rack 4) 8760 0.01 -0.66 ntu
Free Chlorine(Primary 8760 0.75 -2.69 mg/L
Disinfection
Free Chlorine
(Secondary 8760 0.92-2.02 mg/L
Disinfection
Free Chlorine 939 T 0.27-2.02 mg/L
Distribution—Grab
Summary of additional testing and sampling carried out in accordance with the
re uirement of an app roval,order or other legal instrument.
Date of legal instrument Parameter Date Sampled Result Unit of
issued Measure
2013-01-07 8
2013-04-15 14
2010-06-04 Suspended Solids 2013-07-08 <2 mg/L
2013-10-07 2
Avg.: 6.5
Summary of Inorganic parameters tested during this reporting period or the most
recent sample results
Parameter Sample Date Result Value Unit of Measure Exceedance
Antimony 2013-01-07 0.18 µg/L NO
Arsenic 2013-01-07 1.0 µg/L NO
Barium 2013-01-07 22.7 No
Boron 2013-01-07 23 ug/L No
Cadmium 2013-01-07 <0.003 pg/L NO
Chromium 2013-01-07 <0.5 �Ag/L NO
Mercury 2013-01-07 <0.01 µg/l- No
Selenium 2013-01-07 <1 µg/L No
Sodium 2009-05-19 12.1 mg/L No
Uranium 2013-01-07 0.43 µg/l, NO
Fluoride 2009-05-19 0.12 mg/L NO
Nitrite 2013-01-07 <0.005
2013-04-15 <0.003 mg/L NO
2013-07-08 <0.003
2013-10-07 <0.003
Nitrate 2013-01-07 0.134
2013-04-15 0.25 mg/L NO
2013-07-08 0.12
2013-10-07 1 0.04
Drinking Water Systems Regulations Page 5 of 7
(FIBS 4435e01)December 2011
�i ontariO Drinking Water Systems Regulation D. Reg. 970103
Summary of lead testing under Schedule 15.1 during this reporting period
(applicable to the following drinking water systems; large municipal residential systems,small
municipal residential systems,and non-rnunici al ear-round residential s stems
Location Type Number of Range of Lead Results Unit of Number of
Samples min# — max# Measure Exceedances
Plumbing n/a n/a n/a n/a
Distribution n/a n/a n/a n/a
Summary of Organic parameters sampled during this reporting period or the most
recent sample results
Parameter Sample Date Result Unit of Exceedance
Value Measure
Alachlor 2013-01-07 <0.02 L No
Aldicarb 2013-01-07 <0.01 L No
Aldrin+Dieldrin 2013-01-07 <0.01 L No
Atrazine+N-dealkylated metobolites 2013-01-07 0.09 4L No
Azinphos-methyl 2013-01-07 <0.02 L No
Bendiocarb 2013-01-07 <0.01 /L No
Benzene 2013-01-07 <0.32 L No
Benzo(a)pyrene 2013-01-07 <0.004 L No
Bromoxynil 2013-01-07 <0.33 /L No
Carbaryl 2013-01-07 <0.01 L No
Carbofuran 2013-01-07 <0.01 L No
Carbon Tetrachloride 2013-01-07 <0.16 g L No
Chlordane(Total) 2013-01-07 <0.01 L No
Chlorpyrifos 2013-01-07 <0.02 /L No
Cyanazine 2013-01-07 <0.03 L No
Diazinon 2013-01-07 <0.02 L No
Dicamba 2013-01-07 <0.2 L No
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 2013-01-07 <0.41 /L No
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 2013-01-07 <036 /L. No
Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane(DDT)+ 2013-01-07 <0.01 �tg/L No
metabolites
1,2-Dichloroethane 2013-01-07 <0.35 /L No
1,1-Dichloroethylene 2013-01-07 <0.33 n/L No
vin lidene chloride
Dichloromethane 2013-01-07 <035 L No
2-4 Dichlorophenol 2013-01-07 <0.15 L No
2,4-Dichlorophenoxy acetic acid(2,4-D) 2013-01-07 <0.19 L No
Diclofop-methyl 2013-01-07 <0.4 L No
Dimethoate 2013-01-07 <0.03 L No
Dinoseb 2013-01-07 <036 L No
Diquat 2013-01-07 <1.0 L No
Diuron 2013-01-07 <0.03 L No
Drinking Water Systems Regulations Page 6 of 7
(PISS 4435e01)December 2011
ontarb Drinking-Water Systems Regulation O. Reg. 170103
Glyphosate 2013-01-07 <6.0 /L No
Heptachlor+Heptachlor Epoxide 2013-01-07 <0.01 /L No
Lindane(Total) 2013-01-07 <0.01 aL No
Maathion 2013-01-07 <0.02 L No
Methoxychlor 2013-01-07 <0.01 I gg/L No
Metolachlor 2013-01-07 <0.01 L No
Metribuzin 2013-01-07 <0.02 L No
Monochlorobenzene 2013-01-07 <0.3 L No
Paraquat 2013-01-07 <1.0 No
Parathion 2013-01-07 <0.02 L No
Pentachiorophenol 2013-01-07 <0.15 49JL No
Phorate 2013-01-07 <0.01 L No
Picloram 2013-01-07 <1.0 L No
Polychlorinated Biphenyls(PCB) 2013-01-07 <0.04 /L No
Prometryne 2013-01-07 <0.03 /L No
simazine 2013-01-07 <0.01 /L No
THM Annual 47.2 n/L No
(NOTE: show latest annual average) Average
Temephos 2013-01-07 <0.01 /L No
Terbufos 2013-01-07 <0.01 /L No
Tetrachloroethylene 2013-01-07 <0.35 /L No
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol 2013-01-07 <0.14 /L No
Triallate 2013-01-07 <0.01 /L No
Trichloroethylene 2013-01-07 <0.44 /L No
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 2013-01-07 <0.25 /L No
2,4,5-Trichlorophenoxy acetic acid(2,4,5-T) 2013-01-07 <0.22 /L No
Trifluralin 2013-01-07 <0.02 /L No
Vinyl Chloride 2013-01-07 <0.17 /L No
List any Inorganic or Organic parameter(s)that exceeded half the standard prescribed
in Schedule 2 of Ontario Drinking Water Quality Standards.
Parameter Result Value Unit of Measure Date of Sample
n/a n/a n/a n/a
Drinking Water Systems Regulations Page 7 of 7
(PIBS 4435e01)December 2011
Ministry of the Environment Mlnist8re de PEnvironnement
t
Safe Drinking Water Branch Direction du contr8le de la qualU de 1'eau potable
3232 While bait Road,3'd Floor Bureau du district de London
London ON N6E 1 L8 3"dtage I/r- �.nt ri,
Tel(519)873-5094 3232,chemin While Oak i►
Fax(5 19)873-5096 London(Ontario)N6E 1 L8
Tel(519)873-5094
Fax(519)673-5096
January 31, 2014 File no.EL-WE-HO
Municipality of West Elgin
22413 Hoskins Line
Rodney, Ontario NOL 2CO
Attention: Scott Gawley
Administrator/Treasurer
Re: Wastewater Inspection Report-Rodney WPCP
Please find enclosed the Ministry of the Environment Inspection Report for the Rodney WPCP
inspection (Site number 110001667). The compliance assessment took place on Dec. 4, 2013.
The primary focus of this inspection was to confirm compliance with Ministry of the Environment
legislation and control documents, as well as conformance with Ministry wastewater related policies
for the inspection period. The Ministry is implementing a rigorous and comprehensive approach in
the inspection of wastewater treatment systems that focuses on the collection, treatment, and
discharge components as well as wastewater treatment system management practices.
If you have any questions regarding the report, please feel free to call me at(519) 873-5019.
Yours truly,
Stephen Dunn
Drinking Water Inspector
Ministry of Environment
CC. OCWA
I
Ontario
Ministry of the Environment
WW RODNEY LAGOON AND WPCP
Inspection Report
Site Number: 110001667
Inspection Number: 1-AR076
Date of Inspection: Dec 04, 2013
Inspected By: Stephen Dunn
Ministry of the Environment
�r Ontario Inspection Report
OWNER INFORMATION:
Company Name: WEST ELGIN, MUNICIPALITY OF
Street Number: 22413 Unit Identifier:
Street Name: HOSKINS Line
City: RODNEY
Province: ON Postal Code: N01-2C0
INSPECTION DETAILS:
Site Name: WW RODNEY LAGOON AND WPCP
Site Address: LOT 7, CONCESSION 8, RODNEY
County/District: West Elgin
MOE District/Area Office: London District
Health Unit: ELGIN-ST.THOMAS HEALTH UNIT
Conservation Authority NIA
MNR Office: NIA
Site Number: 110001667
Inspection Type: Announced
Inspection Number: 1-AR076
Date of Inspection: Dec 04, 2013
Date of Previous Inspection: Nov 17, 2009
COMPONENTS DESCRIPTION
Site(Name): Rodney Wastewater Treatment Plant
Type: Plant Classification Sub Type: Class II
Comments:
The Rodney Water Pollution Control Plant and Lagoon is a Class II plant. The wastewater treatment
plant operates under Environmental Compliance Approval M 3-0871-88-949 dated March 8, 1994 with
amendments on April 15, 1994 and September 24, 1998.
Site (Name): Main Pumping Station
Type: Collection System Component Sub Type: Pumping station
Comments:
The collection system collects wastewater via gravity into one pumping station, located at 155 Furnival
Road. The pump station wet well contains two submersible pumps(rated at 271-Is)and directs the
wastewater to the wastewater treatment plant or the lagoon. There is a diesel generator onsite to
provide backup power for emergencies which is enclosed in an onsite building. There is an ultrasonic
level control system for level indication and control of the pumps. An override float system is available
should the ultrasonic level system fail. A valve chamber is located near the wet well for isolation of the
forcemain. The wetwell is equipped with a high level float that is connected to the wastewater
treatment plants autodialer.
Report Generated for dunnst on 31101/2014(ddlmmlyyyy) Page 2 of 16
Site#: 110001667
WW RODNEY LAGOON AND WPCP
Date of Inspection: 44/12/2013(ddlmmlyyyy)
}r •
• �' Ministry of the Environment
�rltarlQ Inspection Report
Site(Name): Collection System
Type: Sewage Collection System Sub Type:
Comments:
Not Applicable
Site(Name): Rodney Wastewater Treatment Plant
Type: Mechanical Sewage Treatment Sub Type: Pre-treatment
Comments:
The wastewater flows through the inlet channel(3.87mx0.74mx0.81 m)to a mechanical bar screen.
This is designed for a peak flow of 2190m31d. The wastewater is then split to feed both trains, which
can be blocked to allow for maintenance of one side.
Site(Name): Rodney Wastewater.Treatment Plant
Type: Mechanical Sewage Treatment Sub Type: Secondary Treatment
Comments:
The secondary treatment system consisting of: aeration basins, clarifier tank, and two return activated
sludge/waster activated sludge pumps.
After the aeration tanks mixed activated liquid flows to a single clarifier with a diameter of 9.75m and
depth of 3.66m. The flow is directed through the stilling well with a diameter of 1.94m, this reduces the
velocity of the incoming liquid. Inside the clarifier the solids settle to the bottom. These solids are
collected via the sludge collector mechanism. This system consists of the centre support column,
collector arm, gear assembly and drive unit. Siphon tubes remove the settled sludge to the
return/waste sludge pumping unit. Much of the sludge is returned to the aeration tanks at the head of
the plant, excess sludge is wasted to the sludge management system. The formation of scum or
floatables on the top surface of the clarifier is common phenomenon. It is caused by denitrifying
sludge, oil and grease content or foam resulting from conditions in the aeration tanks. Scum that
forms on the surface of the clarifier is removed using an arm collection system as well. Clear water
flows over weir plates in the clarifier and flows for filtration. Flow is measured at this location using an
ultrasonic transducer and Parshall Flume.
Site (Name): Rodney Wastewater Treatment Plant
Type: Mechanical Sewage Treatment Sub Type: Tertiary Treatment
Comments:
The tertiary treatment system consists of three continuous back wash filter with a four(4) module 2
metre deep bed sand filter housed in the filter building. The disinfection system consists of a ultra-
violet(UV) unit through which the effluent is discharged.
Site (Name): Disinfection
Type: Method of Disinfection Sub Type: Ultraviolet
Comments:
Once the effluent is filtered it flows to the UV Disinfection Units, located in the same building as the
filters. UV lamps are arranged in quartz sleeves and are arranged in arrays, evenly spaced across the
width and depth of the channel. Wastewater passes between lamp banks and is expensed to the
light. The effluent water quality is tested after disinfection, using the autosampler or grab samples.
The treated water is then discharged to Sixteen Mile Creek.
Report Generated for dunnst on 31/01/2014(ddlmmlyyyy) Page 3 of 16
Site#: 110001667
WW RODNEY LAGOON AND WPCP
Date of Inspection: 04/12/2013(ddlmmlyyyy)
t r •
�' Ministry of the Environment
Ontario Inspection Report
Site(Name): Rodney Wastewater Treatment Plant
Type: Biosolids Stabilization Process Sub Type: Chemical Addition
Comments:
There is an alkalinity control system available should it be required to supplement the incoming
wastewater. This system is currently not in use as the alkalinity concentrations are acceptable. The
system consists of two high capacity gear driven mixers to keep the lime slurry in suspension and two
diaphragm pumps rated at 60Uhr.
Site(Name): Lagoon
Type: Effluent Discharge Frequency Sub Type: Continuous
Comments:
Not Applicable
Site(Name): Lagoon
Type: Biosolids Storage Method Sub Type:
Comments:
The waste sludge is pumped to the lagoon, by an automatic timer in the PLC. The timer is adjustable
based on observations made by the operator and through testing the mixed liquor suspended solids.
The sludge is allowed to settle and process in the lagoon. Liquid off the top of the lagoon is
transferred back to the head of the plant for processing. The lagoon will require dredging when the
solids have built up on the floor of the lagoon.
Site(Name): Sixteen Mile Creek
Type: Effluent Discharge Receiver Sub Type: Surface Water
Comments:
After the clarifier the effluent is seasonally disinfected using ultraviolet light, then discharged to
Sixteen Mile Creek.
Site(Name): Rodney Wastewater Treatment Plant
Type: Mechanical Sewage Treatment Sub Type: Chemical Addition
Comments:
Chemical storage and feed facilities for phosphorus removal and alkalinity control, consisting of.
-one (1) 30O00L fibre reinforced plastic tank, installed outside in a spill containment structure,for the
storage of phosphorus removal chemical;
-two (2) diaphragm type metering pumps , one(1)as standby each rated at 24 Llhr
Site(Name): Standby Power
Type: Stand-by Power Generation Sub Type: STP Generator
Comments:
The Main Pumping Station located on Furnival Road has backup power which is supplied by an onsite
generator.
Report Generated for dunnsl on 39/01/2014(ddlmmlyyyy) Page 4 of 16
Site* 910009667
WW RODNEY LAGOON AND WPCP
Date of Inspection: 04/1212013(ddlmmlyyyy)
t � Ministry of the Environment
- Ontario inspection Report
INSPECTION SUMMARY
INTRODUCTI,{,�N
The primary focus of this inspection is to confirm compliance with Ministry of the
Environment legislation and control documents,as well as conformance with Ministry
related policies for the inspection period.
This wastewater treatment and collection system is subject to the legislative requirements
of the Ontario Water Resources Act, 1990(OWRA),the Environmental Protection Act, 1990
(EPA), and the Nutrient Management Act, 2002 (NMA)and regulations made therein.This
inspection has been conducted pursuant to Section 15 of the OWRA,Section 156 of the EPA
and Section 13 of the NMA.
This inspection does not In any way suggest that all applicable legislation and regulations
were evaluated. It is,and remains the responsibility of the owner,to ensure compliance with
all applicable legislative and regulatory requirements.
The inspection consisted of a review of historical information contained in the Ministry files, a
review of plant operating data from the years October 1, 2009 to October 1, 2013, an assessment
of compliance with the terms and conditions of the current Environmental Compliance Approval
and a tour of the treatment facility.
This inspection focused on the sewage treatment plant and included a physical audit of the
pumping station. OCWA's Process and Compliance Technician was interviewed with respect to
general plant operation, maintenance, monitoring, and record-keeping practices.
AQTHORlZIN2Lg_0_NTROL DOCUMENI§
The owner had a valid Environmental Compliance Approval for the sewage works.
The wastewater treatment plant operates under Environmental Compliance Approval (ECA)3-
0871-88-949 dated March 8, 1994 with amendments on April 15, 1994 and September 24, 1998.
CAj?A_QUY ASSESSMENT
The annual average daily flow was approaching the rated capacity of the sewage works.
The ECA states that the sewage works has been approved to treat sewage at an average flow of
590 m3/day. The annual average flow for the inspection review period was below the design flow of
590 m3/day:
2012-496 m3/day (55% of plant capacity). The design average daily flow for the plant was
exceeded 12 times during the year. The hydraulic peak flow of 2,190m3/day for the plant was not
exceeded 2012.
2011 -521 m3/day, or 88.3% of the plant's rated design capacity of 590 m3/day. The design
average daily flow for the plant was exceeded 97 times during the year. The hydraulic peak flow of
2,190m31day for the plant was not exceeded 2011.
2010-397 ml/day(67.3% of plant capacity). The design average daily flow for the plant was
exceeded in several times during the year. The hydraulic peak flow of 2,190m3/day for the plant
was not exceeded 2010.
2009-340.8 m3/day(58% of plant capacity). The design average daily flow for the plant was
exceeded in several times during the year. The hydraulic peak flow of 2,190m3/day for the plant
was not exceeded 2009.
Report Generated for dunnst on 31/01/2014(dd/mm/yyyy) Page 5 of 16
Site#: 110001667
WW RODNEY LAGOON AND WPCP
Date of Inspection 04/12/2013(ddlmm/yyyy)
r •
Ministry of the Environment
Ontario Inspection Report
CAPACITY A§§ESSMENT
* The owner was in conformance with the designed rated capacity for average daily flow into
the sewage works.
The ECA states that the sewage works has been approved to treat sewage at an average flow of
590 ms/day. The annual average flow for the inspection review period was below the design flow of
590 mslday with the highest being 2011 with an annual average flow of 521 mslday, or 88.3%of the
plant's rated design capacity of 590 mslday.
* Flow measuring devices were installed, calibrated and maintained.
Flowmetrix Technical Services Inc. performed the annual calibration on the flow meter in April 2012
and May 2, 2013.
TREATMENT Z&Q_CESSES
* The owner had ensured that all equipment was installed In accordance with the
Environmental Compliance Approval
The physical inspection of the plant verified that all equipment was installed and operational in
accordance with the requirements of ECA#3-0871-88-949.
* The works, related equipment and appurtenances were being operated and maintained to
achieve compliance prescribed by the Environmental Compliance Approval.
Regular scheduled monthly preventative maintenance is assigned and monitored using the
Workplace Management System program. Annual maintenance on the generator was completed
in February by Albert's Generator Services. In house meters for pH and dissolved oxygen are
calibrated by OCWA operators as per manufacturer's instructions.
* The operator-in-charge had ensured that all equipment used in the processes was
monitored, maintained, inspected,tested and evaluated.
Logbook entries and OCWA work orders demonstrate that the owner/operating authority monitor,
inspect and evaluate equipment used in the treatment processes. The OCWA Facility Work Order
Summary provides the work order number, equipment identification/description, activity description
and scheduling/completion dates as well as comments of activity upon its completion.
* The sewage works effluent was essentially free of foreign substances on the day of the
inspection.
EFFLUENT QUALITY AND QUANTITY
* The sewage works effluent limits were prescribed by the Environmental Compliance
Approval.
The wastewater treatment plant operates under Environmental Compliance Approval (ECA) 3-
0871-88-949 dated March 8, 1994 with amendments on April 15, 1994 and September 24, 1998.
There are prescribed limits for BOD5, Suspended Solids, Total Phosphorus, Total Ammonia as
Nitrogen and E. coll.
* The sewage works effluent sample results demonstrated compliance with BODS or CB0D5
limits prescribed by the Environmental Compliance Approval.
The prescribed concentration limit for BOD5 in the Environmental Compliance Approval is 10 mg/L
during the non-freezing period and 15 mg/L during the freezing period. There were no
exceedances of the monthly average limit during the inspection review period.
Report Generated for dunnst on 39/01/2014(ddlmmlyyyy) Page 6 of 16
Site#: 910001667
VWd RODNEY LAGOON AND WPCP
Date of Inspection: 04/1212013(ddlmmlyyyy)
Ministry of the Environment
L - Ontario Inspection Report
EFFLj1ENT QUALITY AND QUANTITY
The sewage works effluent sample results demonstrated compliance with total suspended
solids limits prescribed by the Environmental Compliance Approval.
The prescribed concentration limit for suspended solids in the Environmental Compliance Approval
is 10 mg/L during the non-freezing period and 15 mg/L during the freezing period. These limits
were not exceeded during the inspection review period.
The sewage works effluent sample results demonstrated compliance with total
phosphorous limits prescribed by the Environmental Compliance Approval.
The prescribed concentration limit for total phosphorus in the Environmental Compliance Approval
is 0.5 mg/L during the non-freezing period and 1.0 mg/L during the freezing period. These limits
were not exceeded during the inspection review period.
• The sewage works effluent sample results demonstrated compliance with total
ammonia/total ammonia nitrogenlu n Ionized ammonia limits prescribed by the
Environmental Compliance Approval.
The prescribed concentration limit for total ammonia as nitrogen in the Environmental Compliance
Approval is 3 mg/L during the non-freezing period and 5 mg/L during the freezing period. These
limits were not exceeded during the inspection review period.
• The sewage works effluent sample results did not demonstrate compliance with
microbiological parameter limits prescribed by the Environmental Compliance Approval.
The geometric mean for E. coli in April 2009 was 232 cfu/100ml which exceeded the limit of
200cfu/100ml listed in the Environmental Compliance Approval (ECA)3-0871-88-949.
The E. coil effluent limit exceedance in April 2009 was based on only one sample being taken
during the month upon start up of the system. The system was cleaned and there were no issues
for the rest of the disinfection period.
• The sewage works effluent sample results did not meet the effluent objectives stated in the
Environmental Compliance Approval.
The monthly effluent objective for suspended solids was not met in 2009(April, May). The monthly
effluent objective for E. Coli was not met in 2009 (April)and the monthly effluent objective for
BOD5 was not met in September 2011.
• The inspector collected audit samples during the inspection.
A grab sample of effluent was collected from the plant on December 4, 2013 and submitted to the
Ministry of the Environment's laboratory for bacteriological analysis.
• The results of audit samples collected by the Inspector did not meet the effluent limits or
operational guidelines.
The sample taken on December 4, 2013 at the Rodney WPCP had results of:
EC=2500 c/100ml and
fecal strep= 1800 c/100mi.
The effluent limit for E. coli for this system is based on a monthly geometric mean density of
biweekly grab sample results.
The results can be found in Appendix 1. It was noted that the E. coli level in the sample was
elevated as the sample was taken outside of the disinfection period and the effluent limit does not
apply.
MONITORING REQUIREPAgNTS
Report Generated for dunnst on 31/01/2014(ddlmmlyyyy) Page 7 of 16
Site#: 110001667
WW RODNEY LAGOON AND WPCP
Date of Inspection: 04/12/2013(ddlmmlyM)
� Ministry of the Environment
Y Inspection Report
MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
The sampling requirements were prescribed by the Environmental Compliance Approval.
Condition 13 (Monitoring and Reporting)of ECA#3-0871-88-949 establishes the regulatory
requirements(parameter, sample type and frequency)for influent and effluent monitoring
completed at the Rodney Wastewater Treatment Plant as follows:
INFLUENT MONITORING
• BOD5-biweekly composite sample,
•Suspended Solids-biweekly composite sample,
•Total Phosphorus-biweekly composite sample and
•Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen- biweekly composite sample.
EFFLUENT MONITORING
• BOD5-biweekly composite sample,
• Suspended Solids-biweekly composite sample,
•Total Phosphorus-biweekly composite sample,
• Free Ammonia as Nitrogen -biweekly composite sample,
• Nitrite-biweekly composite sample,
• Nitrate-biweekly composite sample,
•Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen- biweekly composite sample.
•Alkalinity-biweekly composite sample.
• Escherichia Coll. -biweekly grab sample,
• Dissolved Oxygen-biweekly grab sample and
•Temperature-biweekly grab sample.
All sewage works effluent sampling requirements prescribed by the Environmental
Compliance Approval were met.
Final effluent is sampled bi-weekly and tested for BOD5, total suspended solids, total phosphorus,
free ammonia nitrogen, total Kjeldahl nitrogen, nitrite, nitrate, pH and alkalinity. Samples are
collected using an automatic composite sampler and collected over a 24 hour period. A grab
sample of temperature and dissolved oxygen is collected bi-weekly. A grab sample for E. coli is
sampled bi-weekly during the disinfection period from April 15 to October 15. A review of the
records provided by the operating authority indicate that this requirement has been met for the
records reviewed.
All sewage works influent(raw sewage)sampling requirements prescribed by the
Environmental Compliance Approval were met.
Raw sewage is sampled bi-weekly and tested for BOD5, suspended solids, total phosphorus, total
Kjeldahl nitrogen, and alkalinity. The raw samples are collected as 24 hour composite samples. A
review of the records provided by the operating authority indicate that this requirement has been
met for the records reviewed.
The owner had maintained the monitoring records since the date of the last inspection.
REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
Report Generated for dunnst on 31/01/2014(ddlmmlyyyy) Page 8 of 16
Site* 110001667
VVW RODNEY LAGOON AND WPCP
Date of Inspection: 04/12/2013(ddlmmlyyyy)
r •
} � Ministry of the Environment
Ontario Inspection Report
REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
The reporting requirements were not prescribed by an Environmental Compliance Approval.
* The annual performance reports met the submission and contents requirements of the
Environmental Compliance Approval.
Condition 15 of ECA#3-0871-88-949, states that the Owner shall prepare, and submit to the
Regional Director, a performance report, on an annual basis,within ninety(90) days following the
end of each calendar year. The reports shall contain, but shall not be limited to, the following
information;
(a)a summary of all monitoring and compliance reports submitted in the reporting period including
an overview of the success and adequacy of the Works;
(b)a comprehensive interpretation of all monitoring data and a comparison to the effluent quality
and quantity criteria described in sections 11 and 12,
(c) a summary of any effluent quality assurance or control measures undertaken in the reporting
period;
(d)a summary of all maintenance carried out on any major structure, equipment, apparatus,
mechanism or thing forming part of the Works;
(e)a description of any operating problems encountered and corrective actions taken;
(f)a summary of any proposed alteration, extension or replacement in the process or operation of
the works to be completed over the next reporting period which may require approval under the
Ontario Water Resources Act
(g) a tabulation of the volume of sludge generated in the reporting period, an outline of anticipated
volumes to be generated in the next reporting period
(h)an outline of the sludge handling methods and disposal areas to be utilized over the next
reporting period
(i)an evaluation of the calibration and maintenance procedures conducted on all monitoring
equipment
0)an evaluation for the need for modifications to the works to improve performance and reliability
and to minimize upsets and bypasses
Records provided during the inspection verified that the owner of the wastewater treatment plant
complied with all annual performance reporting requirements during the inspection review period,
in accordance with the requirements of Condition 15 of ECA#3-0871-88-949
All reports were submitted in accordance with Ministry recommendations.
ECA#3-0871-88-949 does not require the Municipality of West Elgin to prepare and submit
monthly Municipal Utility Monitoring Program (MUMP) reports. Nevertheless, the Municipality and
the operating authority has undertaken the preparation and submission of monthly MUMP reports
for its municipal sewage treatment works. The Inspector was provided with electronic copies of the
monthly MUMP summary reports for inspection review period.
BYPAS§g§AND OVERFLOWS
A process was in place for the monitoring and reporting of bypasses and overflows should
they occur.
There were no bypasses, overflows or spills during the inspection review period.
CERTIEIC611-0-N AND TRAINING
Report Generated for dunnst on 31/01/2014(ddlmmlyyyy) Page 9 of 16
Site#: 110001667
VWV RODNEY LAGOON AND WPCP
Date of Inspection: 04712/2013(ddlmmlyyyy)
t o'- � Ministry of the Environment
Ontario Inspection Report
CERTIFICATION AND TRAINING
The classification certificates of the subsystems were conspicuously displayed at the
workplace or at premises from which the subsystem was managed.
Section 4(5) of Ontario Regulation 129104(Licensing of Sewage Works Operators)states that the
owner shall ensure that the certificate of classification of the facility is conspicuously displayed at
the facility or at premises from which the operations of the facility are managed.
The owner of the wastewater treatment plant ensured that the certificate of classification for the
Rodney Wastewater Treatment Plant and collection system were conspicuously displayed at the
facility at the time of inspection, in accordance with the requirements of section 4(5)of Ontario
Regulation 129104.
Operator licences were displayed In a conspicuous location at the workplace or at the
premises from which the subsystem was managed.
Section 13 of Ontario Regulation 129104(Licensing of Sewage Works Operators)states that owner
of a facility shall ensure that a copy of the licence of every licensed operator who is employed in
the facility is conspicuously displayed at the operator's workplace or at premises from which the
operations of the facility are managed.
The owner ensured that the licence of every licensed operator who is employed in the facility was
conspicuously displayed at the facility at the time of inspection, in accordance with the
requirements of section 13 of Ontario Regulation 129104.
The overall responsible operator had not been designated for the wastewater treatment and
collection works.
Section 15(1)of Ontario Regulation 129104(Licensing of Sewage Works Operators)states that the
owner of a facility shall designate as overall responsible operator of the facility an operator who
holds a licence that is applicable to that type of facility and that is of the same class as or higher
than the class of the facility. (For example, the overall responsible operator of a Class III
wastewater treatment facility must be an operator who holds a Class III or Class IV wastewater
treatment facility operator's licence.)
The operating authority currently operates the wastewater treatment plant and collection system.
The Municipality operated the collection system prior to May 1, 2013. An ORO was not designated
for the collection system during the inspection review period.
All operators had the appropriate level of licences for the wastewater treatment and
collection works.
Only licensed operators made adjustments to the treatment equipment.
Records provided during the inspection verified that only appropriately certified operators made
adjustments.to the treatment equipment during the inspection review period.
Operators-in-charge were not designated for the wastewater treatment plant and all
associated collection works.
Section 17(1)of Ontario Regulation 129104 (Licensing of Sewage Works Operators)states that the
owner of a facility or a person authorized by the owner shall designate one or more licensed
operators as operators-in-charge of the facility.
The operating authority currently operates the wastewater treatment plant and collection system.
The Municipality operated the collection system prior to May 1, 2013. An operator-in-charge was
not designated for the collection system prior to May 1, 2013.
Report Generated for dunnst on 34/01/2014(ddlmmlyyyy) Page 10 of 16
Site* 110001667
WW RODNEY LAGOON AND WPCP
Date of Inspection: 04/12/2013(ddlmmlyyyy)
r •
Ministry of the Environment
Ontario Inspection Report
CERTIFICATION AND Ta6lbljNG
The operator-in-charge ensured that records were maintained of all adjustments made to
the processes within his or her responsibility.
Section 18(2)(c)of Ontario Regulation 129104 (Licensing of Sewage Works Operators) states that
an operator-in-charge shall ensure that records are maintained of all adjustments made to the
processes within his or her responsibility.
Records provided during the inspection verified that the operator-in-charge ensured that records
were maintained of all adjustments made to the processes within his or her responsibility during the
inspection review period, in accordance with the requirements of section 18(2)(c) of Ontario
Regulation 129104.
LOGBQOKS
The logs and other record keeping mechanisms did not comply with the record keeping
requirements.
Section 19(1)of Ontario Regulation 129104 (Licensing of Sewage Works Operators)states that the
owner of a facility shall ensure that logs or other record-keeping mechanisms are provided to
record information concerning the operation of the facility. Section 19(2)stipulates that entries in
the logs or other record-keeping mechanisms shall be made chronologically. Section 19(3) states
that no person shall make an entry in a log or other record-keeping mechanism unless the person
is an operator-in-charge or is authorized to make an entry by the owner or an operator-in-charge.
Section 19(4)states that a person who makes an entry in a log or other record-keeping mechanism
shall do so in a manner that permits the person to be unambiguously identified as the maker of the
entry. Section 19(5)states that an operator-in-charge or a person authorized by an operator-in-
charge shall record the following information in the logs or other record-keeping mechanisms in
respect of each operating shift:
1.The date, the time of day the shift began and ended and the number or designation of the shift.
2.The names of all operators on duty during the shift.
3.Any departures from normal operating procedures that occurred during the shift and the time
they occurred.
4.Any special instructions that were given during the shift to depart from normal operating
procedures and the person who gave the instructions.
5.Any unusual or abnormal conditions that were observed in the facility during the shift, any action
that was taken and any conclusions drawn from the observations.
6.Any equipment that was taken out of service or ceased to operate during the shift and any action
taken to maintain or repair equipment during the shift.
Records provided during the inspection verified that the owner of the wastewater treatment plant
ensured that logs or other record-keeping mechanisms were provided to record information
concerning the operation of the facility, in accordance with the requirements of section 19 of
Ontario Regulation 129104. However,with the exception of the pumping station, there was no
record keeping for record keeping for the remainder of the collection system prior to May 1, 2013.
Logs and other record keeping mechanisms were available for at least two(2)years.
Section 19(6)of Ontario Regulation 129104 (Licensing of Sewage Works Operators) states that the
owner shall ensure that logs and other record-keeping mechanisms are accessible in the facility for
at least two years after each entry in it was made.
Although the owner of the wastewater treatment plant was only required to retain operational
records for up to two years from the date of their creation, in accordance with the requirements of
Section 19(6) of Ontario Regulation 129104, the owner has kept the logs from a number of years
back.
Report Generated for dunnst on 31/01/2014(ddlmmlyyyy) Page 11 of 16
Site#: 110001667
WW RODNEY LAGOON AND WPCP
Date of Inspection: 04/12/2013(ddlmmlyyyy)
tr��
Ministry of the Environment
r Ontario Inspection Report
OegRATIONS MANUALS
The operations and maintenance manuals met the requirements of the Environmental
Compliance Approval.
Operators and maintenance personnel had ready access to operations and maintenance
manuals.
Section 20(1)of Ontario Regulation 129104 (Licensing of Sewage Works Operators)states that the
owner of a facility shall ensure that operators and maintenance personnel in the facility have ready
access to comprehensive operations and maintenance manuals that contain plans, drawings and
process descriptions sufficient for the safe and efficient operation of the facility.
The owner of the wastewater treatment plant ensured that operators and maintenance personnel
have ready access to up-to-date operations and maintenance manuals (kept on-site), in
accordance with the requirements of section 20(1)of Ontario Regulation 129104.
The operations and maintenance manuals contained up-to-date plans, drawings and
process descriptions sufficient for the safe and efficient operation of the system.
CONTINGEblgyLMRGENCY PLANNING
. Spill containment was provided for the process chemicals and/or standby power generator
fuel.
The owner had provided security measures for the facility.
OTHER INSPECTION FINDINGS
The owner had complied with all Orders or other control documents issued since the date
of the previous inspection.
There was only one order issued by the Ministry of the Environment during the inspection review
period. The MOE issued the Municipality of West Elgin a Provincial Officer's Order#3123-8PLRA2
to allow the one time authorization for an emergency discharge of the contents of the lagoon.
Report Generated for dunnst an 31/01/2014(ddlmmlyyyy) Page 12 of 16
Site* 110001667
WW RODNEY LAGOON AND WPCP
Date of Inspection: 04/1212013(ddlmmlyyyy)
}r Ministry of the Environment
Ontario Inspection Report
NON-COMPLIANCE WITH REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS AND ACTIONS REQUIRED
This section provides a summary of all non-compliance with regulatory requirements identified during the
inspection period,as well as actions required to address these issues. Further details pertaining to these
items can be found in the body of the inspection report.
1. The sewage works effluent sample results did not demonstrate compliance with microbiological
parameter limits prescribed by the Environmental Compliance Approval.
The geometric mean for E. toll in April 2009 was 232 cfu/100ml which exceeded the limit of 200cfu/100ml
listed in the Environmental Compliance Approval (ECA) 3-0871-88-949.
The E. coil effluent limit exceedance in April 2009 was due to only one sample being taken during the
month upon start up of the system. The system was cleaned and there were no issues for the rest of the
disinfection period.
Action(s) Required:
The E. toll effluent limit exceedance in April 2009 was based on only one sample being taken during the
month upon start up of the system. The system was cleaned and there were no issues for the rest of the
disinfection period.
2. The overall responsible operator had not been designated for the wastewater treatment and
collection works.
Section 15(1)of Ontario Regulation 129104 (Licensing of Sewage Works Operators)states that the owner
of a facility shall designate as overall responsible operator of the facility an operator who holds a licence
that is applicable to that type of facility and that is of the same class as or higher than the class of the
facility. (For example, the overall responsible operator of a Class III wastewater treatment facility must be
an operator who holds a Class III or Class IV wastewater treatment facility operator's licence.)
The operating authority currently operates the wastewater treatment plant and collection system. The
Municipality operated the collection system prior to May 1, 2013. An ORO was not designated for the
collection system during the inspection review period.
Action(s) Required:
No further actions are required as the operating authority has taken over the operation of both the
treatment plant and the collection system as of May 1, 2013 and an ORO has been designated for both.
3. Operators-in-charge were not designated for the wastewater treatment plant and all associated
collection works.
Section 17(1)of Ontario Regulation 129104 (Licensing of Sewage Works Operators)states that the owner
of a facility or a person authorized by the owner shall designate one or more licensed operators as
operators-in-charge of the facility.
The operating authority currently operates the wastewater treatment plant and collection system. The
Municipality operated the collection system prior to May 1, 2013. An operator-in-charge was not
designated for the collection system prior to May 1, 2013.
Action(s) Required:
No further actions are required as the operating authority has taken over the operation of both the
treatment plant and the collection system as of May 1, 2013 and OIC's have been designated for both.
4. The logs and other record keeping mechanisms did not comply with the record keeping
requirements.
Section 19(1) of Ontario Regulation 129104 (Licensing of Sewage Works Operators) states that the owner
of a facility shall ensure that logs or other record-keeping mechanisms are provided to retard information
concerning the operation of the facility. Section 19(2)stipulates that entries in the logs or other record
keeping mechanisms shall be made chronologically. Section 19(3) states that no person shall make an
entry in a log or other record-keeping mechanism unless the person is an operator-in-charge or is
authorized to make an entry by the owner or an operator-in-charge.
Report Generated for dunnst on 31/01/2014(ddlmmlyyyy) Page 13 of 16
Site#: 110001667
WW RODNEY LAGOON AND WPCP
Date of Inspection: 04/12/2013(ddlmmlyyyy)
tMinistry�� of the Environment
Ontario inspection Report
Records provided during the inspection verified that the owner of the wastewater treatment plant ensured
that logs or other record-keeping mechanisms were provided to record information concerning the
operation of the facility, in accordance with the requirements of section 19 of Ontario Regulation 129104.
However, with the exception of the pumping station, there was no record keeping for record keeping for
the remainder of the collection system prior to May 1, 2013.
Action(s) Required:
As per s. 19(1)of O. Reg. 129104, the owner of a facility shall ensure that logs or other record-keeping
mechanisms are provided to record information concerning the operation of the facility.
No further action as the owner has now indicated that the operating authority has record keeping
mechanisms for both the treatment facility and the entire collection system.
Report Generated for dunnst on 31/01/2014(ddlmmlyyyy) Page 14 of 16
Site#: 110001667
WW RODNEY LAGOON AND WPCP
Date of Inspection: 04/12/2013(ddlmmlyyyy)
r •
y�7 Ministry of the Environment
Ontario Inspection Report
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS AND BEST PRACTICE ISSUES
This section provides a summary of all recommendations and best practice issues identified during the
Inspection period. Details pertaining to these items can be found in the body of the inspection report. In the
interest of continuous improvement in the interim, It is recommended that owners and operators develop an
awareness of the following issues and consider measures to address them.
1. The sewage works effluent sample results did not most the effluent objectives stated in the
Environmental Compliance Approval.
The monthly effluent objective for suspended solids was not met in 2009 (April, May). The monthly
effluent objective for E. Coll was not met in 2009 (April) and the monthly effluent objective for BOD5 was
not met in September 2011.
Recommendation:
The owner of the sewage works must use best efforts to optimize the treatment system with the goal to
achieve the concentration objectives for the listed parameters at all times.
2. The results of audit samples collected by the Inspector did not meet the effluent limits or
operational guidelines.
The sample taken on December 4, 2013 at the Rodney WPCP had results of:
EC=2500 c1100mi and
fecal strep= 1800 c1100m1.
The effluent limit for E. coil for this system is based on a monthly geometric mean density of biweekly
grab sample results.
The results can be found in Appendix 1. It was noted that the E. coil level in the sample was elevated as
the sample was taken outside of the disinfection period and the effluent limit does not apply.
Recommendation:
The results can be found in Appendix 1. It was noted that the E. coil level in the sample was elevated as
the sample was taken outside of the disinfection period and the effluent limit does not apply. The owner
should ensure the E.coli limit of 2001100mi of the effluent is not exceeded even outside the seasonal
disinfection time period.
Report Generated for dunnst on 31/0112014(ddlmmlyyyy) Page 15 of 16
Site#: 11 0001667
WW RODNEY LAGOON AND WPCP
Date of Inspection: 04/12/2013(ddlmmlyyyy)
r •
t�? Ministry of the Environment
)� Ontario Inspection Report
SIGNATURES
Inspected By: Signature: (P ^virlcial Officer):
Stephen Dunn
Reviewed &Approved By: Signature:.(Supervisor):
Tom Clubb
Review &Approval Date:
Note:This inspection does not in any way suggest thdt there is or has been compliance with
appficable.legislation;and regulations as they apply or may apply to this facility, It is, and remains,
the responsibility of the owner and/or oAerating authority to ensure compliance with al[applicable-
legislative and regulatory requirements.
Report Generated for dunnst on 31101/2014(ddlmmlyyyy) Page 16 of 16
Site#: 110001667
Wlfd RODNEY LAGOON AND WPGP
Date of Inspection: 04112/2013(ddlmmlyyyy)
CAU
- WESA
a Motrld'company DRAFT
6 February 2014
Project No. W-134718-00-15
Ms. Norma Bryant
The Corporation of Municipality of West Elgin
22413 Hoskins line, Box 490
Rodney, ON NOl 2CO
Re: West Elgin Landfill Site
DRAFT Fall 2013 Monitoring Report
Dear Ms. Bryant:
The purpose of this letter is to provide a summary of the environmental monitoring activities
conducted by WESA, a division of BluMetric Environmental Inc., at the West Elgin landfill site in
the fall of 2013.
On April 11, 2012, the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) issued an amendment to the
Environmental Compliance Approval (ECA) (formerly referred to as a Certificate of Approval
(CofA)) No. A051101. All sampling was conducted in accordance with Schedule "B" of the ECA.
In 2011, the Municipality purchased a 50m wide portion of land to the south of the landfill to act
as a contaminating attenuation zone (CAZ). As a result monitoring wells MW6, MW8, MW9,
and MW12 are now considered on-site. Figure 1 details the location of the monitoring wells as
well as the CAZ. The amendment to the ECA discussed above also requires that the Municipality
purchase the 30 m proposed CAZ to the east by December 31, 2013.
MOE Comments dated 9 January 2013 were received by the Municipality of West Elgin
following review of the 2009 and 2011 Annual Site Monitoring and Operations Reports (WESA,
2009 and WESA, 2011). WESA prepared and delivered a Response to these MOE comments
dated 8 February 2013. In response to comment No. 1 from the MOE Groundwater Evaluator,
WESA indicated that following the Spring 2013 sampling event, an analysis would be made as to
whether the proposed 30 m CAZ to the east is appropriate.
Tel.519-742-6685 I WESA, a division of BluMetric Environmental Inc.
L1 Fax.519-742-9810 171 Victoria Street North,Kitchener,Ontario,Canada N2H 5C5
www.wesa.ca
DRAFT
W-8471 8-00-15
6 February 2014
In response to the comment made by the MOE's Surface Water Evaluator (included in the
comments from the MOE dated 9 January 2013), WESA-indicated that an assessment of surface
water quality would be conducted to determine if ongoing surface water sampling is warranted.
This included collection of four surface water samples during the Spring 2013 monitoring event,
including one background sample collected from the Provincially Significant Wetland (PSW)
north of the property.
In addition, WESA collected two surface water samples during the Fall 2013 monitoring event,
including one background sample collected from the PSW north of the property.
WORK PLAN
The environmental monitoring plan for the fall 2013 was done in accordance with the
amendment to the ECA No. A051101. as discussed above.
The monitoring program included:
• Completion of a Landfill Inspection and Checklist;
• Water table measurements in all monitoring wells;
• Methane readings in all monitoring wells as well as in any buildings or structures at
the Site that are founded on or below grade and are at times occupied by people;
• Groundwater sampling and analysis; AND
• Surface water sampling and analysis.
Water table elevations were measured at all 15 of the groundwater monitoring wells on-site (it
should be noted that there is no MW13 on-site). Water elevation results are provided in Table 1
and methane readings are provided in Table 2.
Groundwater samples were collected and analyzed for a series of general inorganic parameters,
metals and volatile organic compounds (VOCs). The full list of parameters analyses and the
results are provided in Tables 3 and 4.
A brief discussion of the results to date is provided below.
WESA
Page 2
a MefriCcompany
DRAFT
W-84718-00-15
6 February 2014
LANDFILL INSPECITON CHECKLIST
The Municipality has received the landfill inspection checklist completed during the fall 2013
event and signatures are still pending.
WATER LEVELS
During the fall 2012 monitoring event, the water elevations in MW15 through MW18 were
influenced by both the shallow groundwater flow system and surface water. During September
and November 2012, the groundwater elevations in these wells indicated that water flowed east
toward MW16 and a component of flow from MW17 and MW18 flowed back towards the
north. The wetland does not extend further east beyond MW16 and therefore there was little to
no flow beyond MW16 within the wetland. It would be expected that any flow at the eastern
edge of the wetland would be more towards the south. A relative assessment of water flow
within the wetland could not be completed for the fall 2013 event, as MW16, MW17 and MWIS
were decommissioned following the fall 2012 monitoring, event at the landowner's request.
Shallow groundwater flow on-site has been characterized by wells completed within the
waste/fill material and the native sand and gravel units (MWI to MW14). Monitoring well
MW2D is completed within the clay layer that underlies the landfill and MW15 is completed
within a wetland and therefore is influenced by both the shallow groundwater flow system and
surface water (precipitation etc).
The groundwater within the shallow flow ranged between 218.15 (MW10) to 217.17 (MW12)
metres above sea level (m as]) in the fall of 2013. Groundwater flow on-site is generally towards
the east. Historically, there has been a mound (an area where water levels are elevated above the
immediate surrounding area) in the groundwater table located along the western property
boundary between MW5 and MWI. The mound has caused a component of the groundwater
flow in the south western corner of the site to flow towards the south (away from MW5 towards
MW10). This occurred last in the November 2011 sampling event.
However, in some more recent monitoring events, including the fall 2013 event, the
groundwater elevations at MW10 have increased to levels at or above the groundwater
elevations at MWI and MW5. There now appears to be a mound located in the vicinity of
MW10 and causes a component of the groundwater flow in the southern corner of the site to
flow towards the north (towards MWI and MW5).
ES
Page 3
o eMetric company
DRAFT
W-134718-00-15
6 February 2014
METHANE
Methane concentrations were measured using a portable Eagle@ combustible gas monitor
calibrated for methane with a Multi-gas methane sensor. Methane readings in parts per million
methane, % LEL (% of Lower Explosive Limit) and % methane were measured within the riser
pipe at each monitoring well location.
Methane concentrations were measured at X100 % LEL in MW5. This well is in close proximity
to historical and/or current land filling operations. Methane concentrations were measured at
17% LEL in MW2D. This monitoring well is screened in the underlying clay unit beneath the
waste pile. The methane concentrations observed at MW2D are consistent with historical
concentrations. The concentrations in the remainder of the wells were 30 ppm (measured in
MW3 and MW8) or lower.
There are no buildings or structures at the site that are founded on or below grade. However,
there is a small trailer that is raised above ground and methane concentrations were measured to
be 5ppm in the nearest adjacent monitoring well.
GROUNDWATER CHEMISTRY
Leachate on-site can be characterized by high concentrations of seven leachate indicator
parameters (WESA, 2008):
• Ammonia/ Organic Nitrogen, alkalinity, arsenic, chloride, dissolved organic carbon
(DOC), iron, and sodium
The MOE Reasonable Use Policy B7 (MOEE, 1994) was established to address the quality of
groundwater on properties adjacent to potential sources of contaminants such as landfills. The
groundwater duality at the site is compared to calculated Reasonable Use Limit (RUL) based on
the background conditions on-site and the Ontario Drinking Water Standards (ODWS, 2003).
MW14 is representative of background groundwater conditions and therefore RULs for the site
have been calculated using the background concentrations from the 2010 and 2011 sampling
events at this well (WESA, 2011), Iron exceeded the RUL at background well MW14 during this
and historic sampling events.
- WESA-
Page 4
a . IMefrie"campany
DRAFT
W-134718-00-15
6 February 2014
In Table 3, parameter concentrations that exceed the background concentration calculated in
MW14 as discussed above are highlighted in bold, while those concentrations that exceed the
RUL are both bolded and italicized. VOC concentrations were compared to the ODWS and
calculated RULs and exceedances highlighted in Table 4.
The following table summarizes all leachate indicator parameters measured in excess of the RUL
and the location of the monitoring well for the fall 2013 sampling event:
Summary of RUL Exceedances
Well Location Monitoring Well Groundwater Flow Leachate Indicator Parameters RUL'Exceedances
Northwest MW1 Shallow Organic N
Leachate MW2 Shallow Ammonia,Alkalinity,DOC,Arsenic,and Iron
(Landfill Footprint)
East MW3 Shallow Ammonia,Alkalinity,DOC,Arsenic and Iron
Southeast MW4 Shallow Ammonia,Alkalinity, DOC and Iron
Southwest MW5 Shallow Ammonia,Alkalinity, DOC,Organic N,Arsenic
and Iron
South—Recently MW6 Shallow Ammonia,Chloride,Alkalinity, DOC,Arsenic
Purchased CAZ and Iron
East MW7 Shallow Ammonia,Chloride,Alkalinity, DOC,and
Sodium
South—Recently MW8 Shallow Ammonia, Chloride,Alkalinity,and DOC
Purchased CAZ
South--Recently MW9 Shallow Ammonia
Purchased CAZ
Off Site MW10 Shallow None
Off Site MWil Shallow Ammonia,Chloride,Alkalinity, DOC,and
Sodium
South—Recently MW12 Shallow Organic N
Purchased CAZ
Off Site MW15 Surface/Shallow Ammonia,Alkalinity,and DOC
Clay MW2D Deep Ammonia and Organic N
The analytical results observed during the monitoring event are, in general, consistent with those
historically observed and reported on-site. It is noted that the concentrations of leachate
indicator parameters ammonia, chloride, alkalinity, and DOC show an increasing trend in MW15
' Please note that there is no RUL for the leachate parameter ammonia:therefore ammonia is compared to average
value calculated in the background well.
WESA
Page 5
a eMetriecompany
DRAFT
W-134718-00-15
6 February 2014
since the well's installation in 2010, with the exception of the fall 2013 concentrations. Significant
decreases in ammonia and chloride (56% and 36%, respectively) were noted for the fall 2013
monitoring event compared to the fall 2012 concentrations, with increases in alkalinity, DOC and
organic N. Reviews of wells considered upgradient of MW15 (in particular MW3, MW7 and
MW11) do not indicate a clear trend (either increasing or decreasing) with respect to these
parameters over a prolonged period of time. It is noted that compared to fall 2012, the fall 2013
indicator parameters show a decrease in concentrations at MW11 (i.e. 29% reduction in chloride
concentration compared to fall 2012 at MWII), with a similar but less pronounced decrease in
indicator parameter concentrations at MW3.
The results of the VOC analyses are summarized in Table 4. The results of the VOC analyses had
concentrations of all parameters measured below the ODWS in the fall of 2013.
A few parameters were detected above the laboratory detection limit but below the ODWS and
followed historical trends. Benzene and chlorobenzene were noted in MW5 in the fall of 2013.
Both parameters have been noted in MW5 since May 2006. Tricholorofluoromethane was noted
in MW2 in the spring of 2013, but was not detected in the fall of 2013. It is noted that the
detection limit for the fall 2013 sample was greater than the concentration detected during the
spring of 2013. Trichlorofluoromethane has been historically noted in MW2 since May 2006.
SURFACE WATER CHEMISTRY
Surface water samples were analyzed for the same parameters as the monitoring wells. Surface
water sampling locations are presented on Figure 2.
Surface Water Location Surface Water 1D Leachate Indicator Parameters RULZ Exceedances
Southeast Wetland (Off-Site) SW2 Ammonia,DOC and Organic N
North Wetland (Off-Site, Background) SW5A DOC and Organic N
The sample collected from SW2 during the spring 2013 monitoring event incorporated the
substrate material into the sample, which appeared to generate "false" hits of metals
concentrations in this sample. SW2 was re-sampled during the fall 2013 monitoring event;
substrate materials were not incorporated into the sample containers. Substrate was also
Incorporated into the spring 2013 sample at SW4. WESA attempted to re-sample this location
2 Please note that there is no RUI.for the leachate parameter ammonia:therefore ammonia is compared to average
value calculated in the background well.
ESA
Page 6
0 Gmefric'compony
DRAFT
W-B4718-00-15
6 February 2014
during the fall 2013 monitoring event; however, standing water was not present at the time of
WESA's site visit.
A background surface water sample was collected from the wetland to the north of the landfill.
Standing water was not observed in fall 2013 at the same location as the sample collected from
SW5 during the spring 2013 monitoring event. A nearby sampling location (SW5A) was selected
as the background surface water location for the fall 2013 monitoring event.
The DOC and organic N concentrations measured in the fall 2013 sample at SW2 are above the
RULs for groundwater at the site. The DOC concentration at SW2 is higher than the background
concentration measured for background surface water features at SW5A. The organic N
concentration at SW2 is lower than the background concentration measured for background
surface water features at SW5A. This indicates that DOC and organic N occur naturally in
concentrations greater than the RUL in surface water.
Surface water samples were also compared to the Provincial Water Quality Objectives (PWQO).
Alkalinity was observed above the PWQO at SW2. The alkalinity concentration at SW5A was
also above the PWQO, at a concentration similar to SW2. This indicates that the alkalinity in
surface water at SW2 is not being impacted by leachate for this parameter. This is supported by
the very low chloride concentrations (i.e. 10.2 mg/L) measured for SW2. All other parameters
analyzed were below the PWQO for SW2 and SWSA.
COMPARISON OF SURFACE WATER QUALITY TO GROUNDWATER QUALITY
Surface water sample SW5A was taken from the off-site wetland to the northwest of the landfill.
This sample is considered to be representative of the background (i.e. not impacted by landfill
leachate) surface water conditions for the natural surface water features in the area.
Parameter Background GW MW15 MW16(Nov SW5A
(MW14) 2012)
Ammonia 0.14 10.7 6.0 <0.050
Chloride 4.0 64.3 121 7.6
Alkalinity 322 453 494 255
DOC 1.8 10.9 10.4 9.7
Organic N 0.07 <1 0.19 0.84
Arsenic 0.0019 <0.0010 <0.0010 0.0015
Iron 1.29 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050
Sodium 4.15 57.5 68.9 1 3.26
WESA
Page 7
o i oMeik company
DRAFT
W-84718-00-15
6 February 2014
The concentrations of ammonia, chloride, arsenic, iron and sodium in surface water at SW5A are
similar to or lower than the background groundwater concentrations for these parameters at
MW14. DOC is elevated at SW5A compared to MW14, however, is slightly lower than the
concentrations observed at MW15. Therefore, elevated concentrations of ammonia, chloride,
alkalinity, and sodium at MW15 and MW16 are not attributed to degradation from surface water
recharge in the SE wetland.
The concentration of DOC and organic N in background surface water at SW5A is elevated
compared to the background groundwater concentrations at MW14. DOC at SW5A is slightly
lower than the concentrations observed at MW15 and MW16. Organic N at SW5A is greater than
the concentration observed at MW16. Natural biological processes occur within wetlands which
causes the breakdown of organic matter. Elevated DOC and organic N in the shallow
groundwater at MW15 and MW16 may be partly attributed to degradation from surface water
recharge in the SE wetland.
The analytical results indicate that ammonia, alkalinity, chloride and sodium at MW15 and
MW16 may be elevated, in whole or in part, due to the migration of landfill-derived leachate
through the shallow groundwater system.
CONCLUSIONS
The results of the groundwater monitoring indicate that general site groundwater flow is towards
the east, with a small component towards the north along the southwestern property boundary.
Evidence of the groundwater flow direction on-site is confirmed by the analytical data obtained
from wells sampled.
The purchase of the CAZ to the south of the site eliminates leachate impact off-site in this
direction. Leachate impacts off-site are restricted to the east and southeast. Towards the east/
southeast, impacts were noted in the on-site well MW7 and in the off-site well MWI1. To the
southeast, leachate impacts have been noted in MW15 and MW16 indicating that groundwater
and leachate are likely discharging into the wetland. Concentrations of leachate indicator
parameter chloride have increased since MW15 was installed in 2010. It is noted that in fall 2013,
a significant reduction (i.e. 65%) in chloride concentration was observed since the spring 2013
monitoring event. Fall 2013 concentrations of ammonia, alkalinity, DOC, and sodium
concentrations also decreased at MW15 for compared to the spring 2013 event. There has been
an overall downward trend observed since the spring 2012 monitoring event for ammonia,
WESA
Page 8
AMNL
a fQMofric"company
DRAFT
W-$4718-00-15
6 February 2014
alkalinity, DOC and sodium. Organic N has displayed a consistent increase over this time period
at MW15. The concentrations of indicator parameters observed in fall 2012 at MW16 are similar
to those observed at MW15. The wetland is an anaerobic reducing system with enhanced de-
nitrification potential/conditions and therefore acts to provide natural treatment of the leachate.
RECOMMENDATIONS
As MW15 has exhibited an increase in leachate indicator parameters since its installation, it is
recommended that the Municipality purchase the property to the east as CAZ by December 2013,
as per MOE requirements. If an agreement to purchase the CAZ in fee simple cannot be obtained
from the adjacent land owner, it is recommended that the Municipality of West Elgin pursue the
acquisition of the water rights beneath the proposed CAZ. The concentrations of leachate
indicator parameters observed at MW16 in fall 2012 were similar to those observed at MW15. It
is also recommended that the Municipality purchase an additional area of land (extending .east
beyond MW116) as a CAZ as shown on Figure 3.
The site will be sampled again in spring 2014 to satisfy the requirements of the ECA.
A final report will be prepared detailing the results of the two 2013 monitoring events and
provided to the MOE no later than April 301h, 2014.
wESA
Page 9
a OMelriCcompany
DRAFT
W-B4718-00-15
6 February 2014
If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned.
Sincerely,
WESA, a division of BluMetric Environmental Inc.
--DRAFT—FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY--
Geoff Moroz, B.Sc., P.Geo. Ian Macdonald, M.Sc., P.Geo
Project Manager/Hydrogeologist Senior Hydrogeologist j
Encl.
Ref 84718-00-15 read Fa112013 Monitoring Letter February_2074.docx
1NESA
Page 10
a 0malric"company
V MpVNp (
N
U rT
The Municipality of West Elgin
TO: COUNCIL OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF WEST ELGIN
FROM: Scott Gawley, Administrator/Treasurer
DATE: February 27, 2014
SUBJECT: 2014 Port Glasgow Trailer Park Budget
RECOMMENDATION:
That the proposed 2014 Budget for the Port Glasgow Trailer Park be adopted:
and further that Administrator/Treasurer obtained an engineer design for the
Service Area 2 & Area 3 for Septic System be completed.
INTRODUCTION:
The annual meeting for the Port Glasgow Trailer Park was announced to be at
1:30 pm on February 27, 2014 to review the 2014 Budget.
DISCUSSION:
The budget has been prepared based on the expenditure and revenue forecast
of 2013 Actual results.
The Park Operator for Booth Operation, Collection of Transient Fees and
Cleaning of Washrooms and Park Facilities was awarded the contract in 2013 for
3 years.
In the 2010 Budget rates for an Individual Lot were Increased by $350.00
(currently at $1,200 for a seasonal lot). The rate increase was based on a report
by Spriet Associates for the Port Glasgow Trailer Park—Wastewater Treatment
Systems Replacement revised in August 2010.
The Proposed Operating Budget for the Trailer Park is attached to this report as
Appendix A.
The Proposed 2014 Fee Schedule with no increase proposed is attached as Appendix
B.
No changes are recommended to the Port Glasgow Trailer Park 2013 Rules and
Regulations—Appendix C.
The Summary of the Annual Performance Report for the Sewage Works at Port
Glasgow Trailer Park for 2013 is attached to the report as Appendix D.
The Capital Budget for 2094 includes the replacement of Area 2 and the Trunk piping
(near the Scout Hall area) to a new location under the field recreation. A map of the
proposal is included as Appendix E. The estimate for work is $351,000 including
Engineering and supervision. A number of problems have surfaced in the existing bed
in Area 2 and the Trunk Line from the back holding tank. The plan replacement is part
of the study completed in the Spriet Associates revised study in August 2010. Reserves
and future revenues have been allocated for this purpose.
Respectfully Submitted,
co Gawley
Administrator/Tr asurer
PA r,,p , v
MUNICIPALITY OF WEST ELGIN
2013 BUDGET
MUNICIPALITY OF WEST ELGIN
PORT GLASGOW TRAILER PARK
PORT GLASGOW TRAILER PARK 2011 2012 2013 2013 2014
REVENUE ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET
FSC-CAMP FEES-SEASONAL 650.053.001 -218,000.00 -219,370.00 -218,790.00 -219,000.00 -219,790.00
FSC-CAMP FEES-TRANSIENT 650.053.002 -45,831.00 -40,158.00 -32,683.05 -42,000.00 -32,000.00
FSC-LAUNDROMAT 650.053.003 -1,820.00 -2,067.75 -2,780.75 -2,000.00 -2,500.00
CAMP FEES-SEWAGE 650.053.004 -3,956.00 -3,480.00 -2,810.00 -3,500.00 -2,800.00
FSC-MISCELLANEOUS 650.053.005 -2,703.91 -2,783.04 -2,925.28 -2,500.00 -2,500.00
TOTAL PARK REVENUE -273,310.91 -267,858.79 -260,969.08 -269,000.00 -259,590.00
EXPENSES
TRANSIENT FEES 762.002.000 22,915.50 20,091.50 19,138.85 21,000.00 20600.00
PETTY CASH 782,003,000 0.00 0.00 0.00
ADVERTISING EXPENSE 782.004.000 459.44 394.72 412.25 500.00 500.00
TELEPHONE 762.005.000 778.02 880.18 932.18 1,000.00 1000.00
MANAGEMENT WAGES
TRAILER PK-WAGES 762.006.001 23,500.00 23,970.01 23,399.61 24,000.00 24,000.00
TRAILER PK-INC TAX 762.006.002 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
TRAILER PK-CPP 762.006.003 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00
TRAILER PK-UIC 762.006.004 585.69 814.03 615.83 820.00 620.00
TRAILER PK-W COMP 762.006.005 485.23 524.94 524.14 550.00 550.00
TRAILER PK-EHT 762.006.006 458.26 467.36 456.24 500.00 500.00
GENERAL OFFICE 762.010.000
SUPPLIES 762.010.001 709,66 747.50 1,044.44 800.00 1000.00
POSTAGE 762,010.002 250.00 250.00 250,00 250.00 250.00
CAPITAL PURCHASES-OFFICE 762.010.010 0.00 0.00 0.00
SUILDING1PROPERTY 762.050.000
HYDRO 762.050.001 51,316.11 42,086.00 45,946.60 55,000.00 50000.00
UNION GAS 762.050,002 684.91 687.40 587.80 800.00 650,00
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 762.050.003 2,688.62 466.76 632.20 800.00 700,00
REPAIRS 762.050.004 3,232.38 11,755.57 5,119.48 5,500.00 _5500
MISCELLANEOUS 752.050.005 19,688,69 17,411.72 15,163.54 15,000.00 16 000.00
MACHINERY MAINTENANCE 762.050.008 1,314.01 267.43 1,392.42 1,000.00 1000.00
INSURANCE 762.050,007 7,346.16 7,785.72 7,366.68 8,000.00 7,800.00
GRASSlYARD MAINTENANCE 762.050.008 9,764.97 9,68412 12,886.65 10,000.00 10 000.00
WATER SYSTEM 762.050.009 9,583.20 3,017.69 2,845.79 3,500.00 3,500.00
CAPITAL-BLDGIPROPERTY 762.050.010 0.00 14,852.20
HYDRO UPGRADE-OLDBOYS 762.050.011 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
SEWAGE MAINTENANCE 762.050.012 10,709.46 8,976.55 20,033.81 5,000.00 6,000.00
CAPITAL ASSETS-OLDBOYS 762.050.100 0.00 0,00 0.00
MINOR CAPITAL PURCHASES
CAPITAL-WASHROOM ROOF
CAPITAL-HEATER
CAPITAL ELECTRIC PANEL
CAPITAL CEMENT PAD
CAPITAL EXP-FIRE SUPPRESSION
CAPITAL MISC TEMP WATER LINE
CAPITAL MONUMENT REPAIRS
CAPITAL AWNING FOOD BOOTH
CAPITAL ENTRANCE SIGN 425.00
CAPITAL WORK SHED
TOTAL EXPENSE 166,490.31 165,357.00 158,728.51 153,820.00 149,570.00
NET INCOME -106,820.60 -102,501.79 -102,240.87 -115,180.00 -110,020.00
TRANSFER TO RESERVE 106,820.60 102,501.79 102,24157 115,180.00 110,020.00
NET PORT GLASGOW OPERATING 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
F.4G� ,7
COMMENTS:
Camp Fees:
No proposed fee increase in 2014,as reserves will be used for Proposed Capital Replacements in 2014
Booth Operation,Collection of Transient Fees and Cleaning of Washrooms and Park Facllttles:
The current operator is in the 2nd year of 3rd contract to provide these duties.
Net Income:
Transferto Reserve
The Port Glasgow Trailer Park is operated as a self-funding operation with no subsidy from the Property Tax Ratepayers.
2011 2012 2013 2013 2014
CAPITAL EXPENSES ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET
CAPITAL EXP-SEPTIC SYSTEM 74,322.37 171,705.01 44,205.84 50,000.001 351,00D.001
CAPITAL LAWNMOWER 11,746.00 20,000.00
CAPITAL WORK SHED 9,500.00 40 000,00 40 000.00
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENSE 74 322.37 171 705.01 66 451.84 110 000.00 391,000-00
TRANSFER FROM RESERVE -74,322.37 -171,705.01 -65,461.84 -110,000.00 391 000.00
NET PORT GLASGOW CAPITAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0100
PORT GLASGOW TRAILER PARK
8650 Furnival Road
R.R.# 3, Rodney, Ontario NOL 2CO
(519) 785-0069
2014 RATES SEASONAL CAMPING
All rates are for the period beginning May 1St, 2014 and ending.October 31St, 2014. Camping season is closed
October 31St @ 1:00 pm. Gate will be locked.
If full payment is not received in the office by May 1,2014—a 10%penalty charge will charged--no
exceptions. Full payment, plus penalty needs to be paid by May 31St,2014 or the trailer will be removed from
the lot and the lot will be re-leased.
Cheques are to be payable to "The Municipality of West Elgin"and mailed to P.O. Box 490, Rodney, Ontario
NOL 2CO (519) 785-0560.
PLEASE PROVIDE YOUR CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE IN THE
AMOUNT OF $190009000 FOR 2013 in effect from May 1st, 2014 to October 31st, 2014 OR
May 1St, 2014 to April 30", 2015
NOTE: A$20.00 SERVICE CHARGE WILL BE CHARGED FOR CHEQUES RETURNED N.S.F.
RATES
SCHEDULE "A"TO BY-LAW No. 2010-20
PORT GLASGOW TRAILER PARK $
Lots-with 30 am R. service $1,200.00
Additional charge for lots fronting the lake $100.00
Winter story e $ 50.00
Reservation fee $ 50.00
Additional charge for air conditioner $60.00
Additional char a for fridge,freezer or dryer $60.00
Electric golf carts $60.00
-- - Boat trailer parking $50.00
Additional charge for electric or electric/gas hot $60.00
water tanks
Deposit for assessment Current assessment X previous year tax rate+ 15%,
rounded to the nearest dollar
Washers&dryers $1.50--washer
$1.75 -d er
Deposit for door key for laundry room $ 5,00 refundable upon return
Rental of Dance Hall $25.00
Overnight camping—tents(June to October) $20.00+$2.00 sewage surcharge nightly,$120.00
+$12.00 sewage surcharge week]y**
Overnight camping—including hydro and water $23.00+$2.00 sewage surcharge nightly, $138.00
+$12.00 sewage surcharge week] **
Overnight camping—including hydro,water and $25.00+$2.00 sewage surcharge nightly, $150.00
sewer +$12.00 sewage surcharge weekly*
**Month!y rate based on 3 weeks
Cutting of grass on behalf of trailer owner $20.00 per cut
Cleaning of yard at an individual trailer site $ 15.00 per hour
NOTE: HST WILL BE CHARGED WHERE APPLICABLE
Port Glasgow Trailer Park
2013 Rules and Regulations
1. Camping season is closed October 3181,2013® 1:00 pm. Gate will be locked.
2. Park residents and guests are responsible for adhering to the maximum speed of 5 mph.
(8 kmp). This includes bicycles,motor vehicles and any motorized vehicles operating
within the Part Glasgow Trailer Park(hereinafter referred to as"PGTP"}.
3. Boats and other vessels,including trailers,are to be stored in designated"Boat Storage
Area"only. A fee,in accordance with the Port Glasgow Trailer Park Fees&Charges
By-Law,will be charged for storage.
4. Fireworks are not permitted within PGTP.
5. Visitors are not allowed within PGTP after 11:00 p.m.
6. Unnecessary and unreasonable noise is prohibited within PGTP at all times. Between
11:00 p.m.and 8:00 a.m,on the next day,any sound disturbing any occupant of PGTP is
strictly prohibited.
7. Assigned sites are to be maintained by the Licensee in a neat and tidy condition,
including the cutting of grass and maintenance of landscaping, if management to out
grass,a fee will be charged.
S. Bicycles and other muscle powered vehicles shall not be ridden within PGTP within 30
minutes before sunset to 30 minutes after sunrise each day.
9. Motorized vehicles including motorized bicycles and scooters may be used within PGTP
only if operated by a person licensed to drive upon a highway in the Province of Ontario
and only for the purpose of transportation from one location to another location within
the facility.No all-terrain vehicles or dirt bikes are allowed.
10. Subject to the provisions of any Municipal or Provincial law,licensees are permitted a
maximum of two(2)domestic pets per lot within PGTP. Any pets must be leashed when
outside of any trailer. Licensees are required to pick-up and appropriately deposit all
waste associated with his/her pet or pets. Any pets showing aggressive behavior or
excessive barking may be removed from the park.
11. Licensees shall recycle waste products. Garbage shall be placed in clear bags and
thereafter deposited at designated sites within PGTP.
12. Trash or other waste shall not be thrown over lake bank.
13. Burning of leaves is strictly prohibited. Loose leaves may be thrown over the lake bank.
14. Fish cleaning outside of trailer within PGTP is strictly prohibited.
15. Washing of vehicles within PGTP is prohibited.
16. Consumption of alcoholic beverages is permitted only within or upon the assigned site at
PGTP.
17. Public intoxication,foul language,and other conduct disturbing the peace within PGTP is
strictly prohibited.
18. The periodic erection of one tent(5 feet by 5 feet)is permitted,provided that the said tent
is erected completely within the boundaries of the assigned site.
19. Only approved electrical cords are to be used to connect trailers to hydro receptacles. All
shed wiring requires a permit from Hydro One.
20. Outdoor lighting and air conditioners must be turned off when trailers are not occupied.
21. Lights must be turned off throughout the night hours.
22. Decorative posts and ornaments are to be erected at least three feet from the closest edge
of the traveled portion of the road way within PGTP.
page 9 of 10
23. Minor construction,including decks,sheds,or add-a mom structures,arc permitted with
the prior written consent of the Park Manager.Contact municipal office for further
information.
• Construction is strictly prohibited between 8:00 pm and 8:00 am.
• Any construction work will be permitted in May,June,September and October
between 8:00 am and 8:00 pm.
• During duly and August,weekend construction is prohibited from 8:00 pm to
8:00 am on Friday until the following Monday(provided where Monday is a
statutory holiday,then construction is prohibited from 8:00 pm on Friday to 8:00
am on the following Tuesday).
• Any construction larger than 107 square feet in area,please contact Lorne
McLeod,Building Inspector.
24. Metal detectors are prohibited within PGTP.
25. No stakes shall be driven into the ground upon any assigned site within PGTP.
26. The Licensee is prohibited from altering any Municipal property,including the trimming
of trees,within PGTP. No nails or screws to be put into trees.
27. The use of washing machines within trailers upon an assigned site-is prohibited. The use
of clothes dryers within trailers upon an assigned site is permitted,subject to prior
consent of the Park Manager or other authorized Municipal representative and payment
of an additional hydro charge.
28. Extra appliances must be stored within a proper shed structure.
29. Private lotteries/raffles are prohibited within PGTP unless a license permitting same has
been obtained from the Municipality.
30. Prior reservations are required for use of any picnic shelter,bingo hall,pavilion or scout
hall within PGTP.
31. The Municipality reserves the right to evict any person,including occupant,guest,or
invitea,for improper conduct.
32. upon vacating the assigned unit at PGTP at the end of the permitted season,the Licensee
shall disconnect all hydro and water connections to his or her trailer.
33. No refunds for partial year will be given.
34. Vacant lots or New Occupancy of Trailers:
a) Vacant Lots:
1) When vacant lots become available,it will be advertised by Manager on all
bulletin boards. Present occupants may apply to municipality. If two or
more applications are received,the decision will be based on length of time
in park.
ii) Advertisements for available lots will be placed on all bulletin boards for a
minimum of two weeks,comprising three(3)weekends.
iii) If there is a dispute regarding seniority,it is the responsibility of the
applicant to produce documentation,i.e.cancelled cheques,receipts.
iv) If no one in the park is interested in moving,the lots will be made available
to those who have registered an interest with the Manager.
b) Interested new occupants must leave their name and phone number with the
Manager.
c) Trailer owners are permitted to sell their trailer and new owners may continue on
the lot in which the trailer is located on.
d) When owners wish to sell their trailers,it will be advertised-on the bulletin boards
by the owners.
Page 10 of 10
Annual Performance Report
Sewage Works at Port Glasgow Trailer Park
2013
The Corporation of the Municipality of West Elgin
22413 Hoskins Line, Box 490
Rodney, Ontario
Prepared by:
Mysson Consultants Inc.
16 Silver Lake Lane
PO Box 524
Port Carling, Ontario
POB 1 JO
FEBRUARY 2014
MYSSON CONSULTANTS INC.
BON 40897
16 Silver Lake Lane
PO Box 524
Port Carling, Ontario
POB 1 JO
06 February 2014
The Municipality of West Elgin
22413 Hoskins Line
Box 490
Rodney, Ontario
NOL 2C0
Att: Mr. Mike Kalita
Dear Mr. Kalita;
Mysson Consultants Inc. is pleased to submit our report for the Corporation of the
Municipality of West Elgin and the Port Glasgow Trailer Park. This report, as explained
by Mr. John McGlynn of the Ministry of the Environment, is condition 8 (2)(a)(b)(c)of
the Certificate of Approval 7034-89CKAX.
The waste water treatment system was completely rebuilt in the month of May. During
the time of construction reports were generated by Mysson Residential Consultants Inc.
and submitted to the Municipality of West Elgin.
The construction was completed by May 10, 201 f and from that point onward regular
maintenance was undertaken as well as monitoring and recording as part of the
requirements of certificate of approval.
If you have any questions concerning our report, please call us.
Sincerely;
MYSSON CONSULTANTS INC.
David Wemyss BON 25245
President
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION ........................................................................... I
MONITORING ............................................................................ I
SYSTEM PERFORMANCE .................................................................2
OBSERVATIONS ,CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS....................3
CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL/PROVINCIAL ORDER ...............APPENDIX A
LABORATORY RESULTS......................................................APPENDIX B
PUMP RECORDS..................................................................APPENDIX C
Annual Performance Report
Sewage Works at Port Glasgow Trailer Park
2013
INTRODUCTION:
The sewage treatment facility at the OId Boys Trailer Park is composed of a pump
chamber,two septic tanks, four Waterloo BiofiIters® and a contact area(leaching
area). The effluent is collected from a group of trailers north of the treatment
facility and transported through a new sanitary sewer constructed in the spring
and summer of 2012. Sewage is also collected from a group of trailers south of
the treatment facility and transported via the old sanitary sewer system.
The septic tanks separate the solid waste from the liquid. The effluent then moves
into a pumping chamber. There are two pumps in the chamber which pump the
effluent into the four Waterloo Biofilters® for treatment.
The final stage of the treatment takes place in the leaching area.
MONITORING AND RECORDING:
As mentioned in the covering letter monitoring and recording was undertaken by Mysson
Residential Consultants Inc. The result of the analysis of the treated effluent is included
in Appendix B. The quantity of effluent treated was determined by recording the number
of pump cycles daily. This information coupled with the flow rate of the pumps
produced a daily flow rate.
MAINTENANCE: (as stated in 2012 annual report)
Regular maintenance commenced on May 23, 2014.
Date Description
May-23 Inspected the spray nozzles of the WBF
Reviewed pumping chart with onsite personel
Installed new risers and lids
Adjusted flow by manipulating the ball valves
within the WBF
Jun-12 Cleaned all valves
Obtained samples for analysis
Jul-09 Cleaned hydro spray off the WBF
Put new stain on the WBF
Cleaned effluent filters
Provided enzyme treatment in septic tanks
Jul-10 Provided landscaping around access hatches
Obtained samples for analysis
Jul-24 Supplied and installed new riser and lids for
the north waste water system
Aug-28 Inspected the spray nozzles and the foam in
the WBF
Provided enzyme treatment in septic tanks
Obtained samples for analysis
Sep 25 Flushed all WBF nozzles
Cleaned effluent filters
OBSERVATIONS:
1. A review of the pump records indicates that we are within the 31,625 liters per
day as outlined in the Certificate of Approval subsection-"Service Area One".
2. There are 3 exceedences with the effluent objectives. This is typical when a new
waste water system is brought on line. It takes time for the bacteria to grow within
the treatment unit which will assist with the overall treatment of the effluent.Note
that the August results are within the objectives.
Date Jun-12 Jul-11 Aug-28 Effluent Objectives
CBODs 38 mg11 32 mg/I 21 mg/1 30 mg/I
TSS 30 mg/I 46 mg/I 13 mg/I 30 mg/I
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS :
1. The waste water system appears to be producing effluent that does reflect the
design as stated in the Proposed Works for Service Area 1 as described in
Certificate of Approval 7034-89CKAX.
2. Public health and welfare is protected with this waste water system that was
developed by the Municipality of West Elgin. Continued maintenance and
monitoring will enable years of summer recreational camping.
Prepared by:
MYSSON RESIDENTIAL CONSULTANTS INC.
David Wemyss
President
BC1N 25245
THE CORPORATION OF THE UNITED TOWNSHIPS OF
r� HEAD,. ARA & MAC
"�" '"•'
15 Tovmship Mall Road
STONECLIFFE, ONTARIO KOJ 2K0
Phone:(613)586-2526 1 Fax:(613)586-2596 E-mail:Ewcs cmaxolomet.com
Monday, February-10-14
The Honourable Kathleen Wynne, Premier
I
Legislative Building
Queen's Park
Toronto ON M7A 1A1
Dear Premier Wynne
At the regular meeting held on Friday, October 25, 2013, the Council of the United Townships of
Head, Clara&Maria discussed and passed a resolution,lobbying the provincial government to stop
the roll out of mandatory on-sits septic system inspections. Further Council requests that
mandatory inspections only be required in known vulnerable areas adjacent to source water
protection areas.
Council requests that the province sincerely consider the costs associated with such a program
and ensure that any new regulations build in a funding mechanism as municipalities and property
owners cannot continue to rely on the already strapped property tax base for additional provincially
legislated programs and inspections.
Sincerely and on behalf of Council,
IIV4�
Melinda Reith
Municipal Clerk
Enclosures: copy of resolution
cc: Hon. Linda Jeffrey, Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing
Mr. John Yakabuski, MPP Renfrew Nipissing-Pembroke
Jim Hutton, CAO, County of Renfrew
AMO--Association of Municipalities of Ontario
County Municipalities for support
'5x;;7THE COREQRATION OF TH9 UNITED'TOWNSHIPS OF HEAD] CLARA Ji MARIA
Date: Friday, Oct b 25, 2013 Resolution No.:25l10l13f004
Moved by: Seconded fay:
WHEREAS the provincial government regularly make sweeping regulations and
policies without giving appropriate consideration to specific locations or the
effects on smaller municipalities and the rights of Individuals:
AND WHEREAS government regulations now control and limit many property
owner rights and privileges restricting more and more as time goes on;
AND WHEREAS the Council of the United Townships of Head, Clara & Maria
does recognize that legislation is required to protect the environment from some
who may not maintain their properties appropriately;
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT this Council does hereby lobby the
provincial government to stop the process of mandatory on-site septic system
Inspections and to continue to only require them In known vulnerable areas
adjacent to source water areas;
AND FURTHER THAT should regular and routine inspections become
mandatory across the province that the province builds into any regulation the
corresponding funding to compensate property owners and the small
municipalities who cannot continue to rely on the property tax base to meet the
constant downloading of responsibility without equivalent funding;
AND FURTHE THAT this resolution be circulated for support.
Carried Defeated Reeve
Information Regarding On-Site Sewage Systems Maintenance Inspections Page 1 of 3
Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing
n
ABOUT I NEWSROOM 1 708 OPPORTUNITIES I CONTACT US
You are here >Home >XqUr Ministr > Ontario-Building Code > Not Tonics > Information Regarding On-Site Sewage
Systems Maintenance Inspections
Information Regarding On-Site Sewage Systems Maintenance
Inspections
.............................. ................_............._...................., ....._........ .. .........
On-Site Sewage Systems Maintenance Inspections Implementation Materials
The Building Code (Ontario Regulation 350/06) was recently amended by Ontario Regulation 315/10
to establish and govern mandatory on-site sewage system maintenance Inspection programs to be
administered In certain areas by principal authorities, i.e., municipalities, health units and/or
conservation authorities. The amendments also govern discretionary on-site sewage system
maintenance inspection programs established by principal authorities.
These amendments help protect Ontario's drinking water and the natural environment, and support
the implementation of the Clean Water Act, 2005 and the Lake Simcoe Protection Plan. The "in-force„
date for many of these programs is January 1, 2011. The balance of the regulation, concerning
certain areas around the Lake Simcoe shoreline and watershed, comes into effect January 1, 2015.
To support implementation of these regulations, the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing has
released inspection certificate forms for mandatory and discretionary inspection programs. These
forms are to be issued by principal authorities and then completed and returned by third-party
inspectors of on-site sewage systems. Principal authorities have the authority to decide whether to
accept third-party inspection certificates.
The ministry has also released an Order to Comply form to be used in the case that an on-site sewage
system is found to be in violation of the Building Code. This form is similar to other Prescribed Orders
and Orders to Comply already mandated for use by principal authorities and registered code agencies.
These forms are available on the Ministry website under Publications.
To assist principal authorities with implementation of the regulations, information regarding on-site
sewage system maintenance inspections has been prepared for explanatory purposes. This document,
developed jointly with the Ministry of the Environment, describes a progressive audit approach to
maintenance inspections for on-site sewage systems, Under this approach, Initial inspections are
designed to be non-intrusive tests and will generally avoid significant disturbance to the system and to
the surrounding soil area. Where concerns are identified, further investigation may follow. This
document has been prepared for explanatory purposes only and does not form part of the regulation.
This document is now available on the Ministry website under I?ublications,
Maps Illustrating select areas in which maintenance inspection programs will not be required within
five years of January 1, 2011 have been prepared. To view maps, see Lake Simcoe shoreline maps.
http://www.mah_gov.on.ra/Page9236.aspx 15/10/2013
Information Regarding On-Site Sewage Systems Maintenance Inspections Page 2 of 3
Mandatory On-site Sewage System Maintenance Inspection Programs
Ontario Regulation 315/10 requires principal authorities to administer mandatary an-site sewage
I
maintenance inspection programs within their areas of jurisdiction. The regulation defines the
geographic areas where inspections of on-site sewage systems will be required and the timeframes
within which Inspections must be carried out.
Inspections of on-site sewage systems will be required in the following areas:
• In areas located within 100 metres of the Lake Simcoe shoreline and within 100 metres of Other
lakes or ponds and permanent rivers or streams in the Lake Simcoe watershed. Maps Illustrating
certain mandatory areas for maintenance Inspections along the Lake Sim Coe-shoreline are
available.
• The mandatory Inspection program would also be required in parts of"vulnerable areas"located
In source protection areas identified through the source protection planning process under the
Clean Water Act, 2006. The"vulnerable areas"are in the process of being determined by local
source protection committees and will be identified in Assessment Reports. These reports are to
be approved by the Director of Source Protection Programs Branch of the Ministry of the
Environment, The last Assessment Reports are due in December 2010, and anticipated to be
approved In 2011. Inspections would be required in areas where on-site sewage systems subject
to the BCA have been identified as a significant drinking water threat, For more information
please refer to Drinking W So r e PCoLes;tiga page.
Inspections of on-site sewage systems must be carried out within the following timeframes:
• Inspections of on-site sewage systems located within 100 meters of certain portions of the Lake
Simcoe shoreline would be required within five years of January 1, 2011 and every five years
thereafter.
• Inspections of on-site sewage systems located within 100 metres of the balance of the Lake
Simcoe shoreline and 100 metres of other lakes or ponds and permanent rivers or streams in
the Lake Simcoe watershed, would be required within five years of January 1, 2016 and every
five years thereafter.
• Inspections of on-site sewage systems located in "vulnerable areas"would be required within
Five years of January 1, 2011. Where the applicable assessment report or source protection plan
Is approved under the Clean Water Act after January 1, 2011, inspections would be required
within five years of the report or plan's approval, and every five years thereafter.
Discretionary On-Site Sewage System Maintenance Inspection Programs
The regulation also governs discretionary on-site sewage maintenance inspection programs
established by principal authorities. The regulation provides that these programs shall apply to all on-
site sewage systems in the area affected by the program, and that an Inspector shall inspect all
sewage systems affected by the program,
Related sinks
• Certiflcate - ManOato_a Sewa a System Maintenance aftd DiscLetl!2nary Inspection PMctram
•
Form - Order to C I
• Lake Simcoe shorellne maps
• Information. Regarding On-Site Sewage System Maintenance Ins e,eCtions
http://�,N,ww..mah.gov.on,WPage9236.aspx 15/10/2013
TIDE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF ATIKOKAN
COUNCIL RESOLUTION
Date: 13 Jan 2014
Moved by:
Seconded by: CZ llld-�
WHEREAS Ontario municipalities are voicing their concerns and filing letters of objection or letters in support to the Provincial
government regarding the proposed new police billing model;and
WHEREAS objections to the new model are being heard from municipalities that may experience an increase in their municipal
policing costs;and
WHEREAS all police services require a base level of infrastructure,supervision,administration and sufficient front-line policing
necessary to provide adequate proactive policing,to ensure the general safety and security of municipalities;and
WHEREAS all municipalities should pay their equitable share of essential"base level"policing services;and
WHEREAS the principles and design of the proposed new billing model is based on a fairer approach and significantly enhances
transparency;and
WHEREAS the proposed model would charge each municipality a flat$260 per Household fee for the base costs related to
providing police services,plus a variable charge for each call for service;and
WHEREAS the Town of Atikokan currently pays approximately$1,000 per household which is much higher than many other
Ontario municipalities;
NOW THEREFORE BE TT RESOLVED that Council for the Town of Atikokan supports the proposed billing model change or a
model for policing that ensures an equitable distribution of cost sharing for all municipalities and unorganized territories in Ontario;
and
FURTHER BE IT RESOLVED that this resolution be forward to The Honourable Kathleen Wynne,Premier of Ontario;The
Honourable Madeleine Meileur,Minister of Community Safety&Correctional Services;The Honourable John Gerretsen,Attorney
General of Ontario;MPP Bill Mauro;and all other municpalities in Ontario.
CORDED VOTE COUNCIL MEMBER
YEA NAY CARRIED DEFEATED
AVIDSON,Marlene
ICKSON,Bud
WSSELR'LJ G Bob
AMBKIN,Marj
KARENKO,Mary
ROWN Dennis
RESOLUTION NO / N CARRIED BY
105 Elgin St. West tel 613 623 4231 Arnprior @arnprior.ca
AR N P R I OR Arnprior,ON US OA8 fax 613 623 8091 www.arnprioraa
February 11, 2014
Kathleen Wynne, Premier
Legislative Building
Queen's Park
Toronto, ON M7A 1A1
Dear Premier Wynne,
Please be advised that Council of the Corporation of the Town of Arnprior, at their
meeting held on February 10, 2014, adopted Resolution No. 059-14, as follows:
"WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Town of Arnprior
recognizes that increased electricity rates are challenging for the
economic competitiveness of the Town of Arnprior and its residents;
AND WHEREAS the County of Renfrew passed a resolution on November
27, 2013 encouraging the Government of Ontario to ensure that our
electricity rates both in the short and long-term, allow our businesses to
remain competitive in a global environment and ensure that the vulnerable
residents of our communities are not overburdened by ever-increasing
electricity rates;
AND WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Town of Arnprior
supports the County of Renfrew in its attempt to encourage the
Government of Ontario to not approve any further rate increases for
electricity;
AND WHEREAS it is estimated that electricity costs will increase by
approximately 50% within the next five years;
AND WHEREAS an increase in electricity rates by the Ontario Energy
Board will exacerbate an existing problem for industry and consumers with
low or fixed incomes in Arnprior;
• WHERE THE RIVERS MEET •
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Town of Arnprior urges in the
strongest possible way that the Government of Ontario ensures that
electricity rates both in the short and long-term, allow our businesses to
remain competitive in a global environment and ensure that the vulnerable
residents of our communities are not overburdened by ever-increasing
electricity rates;
AND FURTHER BE IT RESOLVED THAT this resolution be sent to the
Premier of Ontario, the Minister of Energy and Infrastructure, the Ontario
Energy Board, the Ontario Power Authority,?Associations of Municipalities
(AMO), MPP John Yakabuski, Ontario Municipalities and Local
Municipalities in Renfrew County for support.
AND FURTHER BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Town of Arnprior urges the
Ontario Energy Board in the strongest possible way not to approve any
further rate increases for electricity."
Your assistance in ensuring our businesses stay competitive and our residents
are not overburdened by ever-increasing electricity rates is greatly appreciated.
Respectfully,
Maureen Spratt, Clerk
c Minister of Energy and Infrastructure
Ontario Energy Board
Ontario Power Authority
AMO
John Yakabuski, MPP Renfrew-N1pissing-Pembroke
Ontario Municipalities (by email)
Renfrew County Municipalities (by email)
{ ° n Al. �I
,=j4,
Honorary Patron: Lupus Foundation 294 Ridge Road N Box 687
Ridgeway ON LOS iN0
The Hon.David C.Onley of Ontario (800)368-8377 ON Only
Lieutenant Governor of Ontario �. (905)894-4611
February 4, 2014 tt (905)8944616
e® lupusont @vaxxine.com
Website:www.vaxxine.com/lupus
Serving Ontario since 1977(Inc.)
Municipality of West Elgin
22413 Hoskins Line Box 490
Rodney ON NOL 2CO
To Whom It May Concern:
The international lupus patient community-is requesting your assistance in promoting public
awareness and advocacy for"the least known major disease--lupus". We have two very important events
planned for 2014 which are: World Lupus Day, May 10th and the entire month of October which is known,
world-wide, as "October is Lupus Awareness Month".
Lupus affects more than just the person diagnosed with the disease—it also impacts their family,
friends and colleagues. It is widely under-recognized as a global health problem by the public, health
professionals and governments which drives the need for greater awareness. Early recognition and a
definitive diagnosis help to slow the debilitating effects of this disease. Proper treatment, a healthy diet and
lifestyle are essential. Lupus is difficult to diagnose as the symptoms frequently mimic common illnesses.
With your help, public awareness and education will save lives.
We are enclosing two Proclamations,for May and October that we ask to be added to your
municipal websites for all citizens to access. We know that many are unaware of the signs and symptoms
of lupus and it is our hope to make every person aware that their vague health concerns could be lupus.
Our office has been located in Ridgeway for the past forty years. Receiving no funding from any
level of government, we depend upon personal and corporate donations to provide our programmes, attend
provincial Health Pairs, contribute financially to much-valued research, and distribute literature throughout
Ontario to all those who request information.
In the past, we have received amazing support from many communities in Ontario who do read our
Proclamations during televised meetings for their viewers, and add the Proclamation to their websites in the
designated months. Many have passed resolutions to ask their local MPs and MPPs to assist with lupus
funding for research.
We would be honoured to have your support for both of these events. Thank you.
Very truly yours,
'.. ` Kathy Crowhurst
Charitable Registration Number
10764 9410 RR0001 Life without lupus
=Af
Honorary Patron: Lupus Foundation 294 Ridge Road N Box 687
Ridgeway ON LOS 1NO
The Hon.David C. Onley of Ontario 800-368-8377 ON Only
Lieutenant Governor of Ontario V. 905-8944611
qr 905-8944616
e® lupusont @vaxxine.com
Website:www.lupusfoundationofontario.com
Serving Ontario since 1977(Inc)
World °
Up Day-
Whereas, lupus is an autoimmune disease that can cause severe damage to the tissue and organs in the
body and, in some cases, death; and
Whereas, more than five million people worldwide suffer the devastating effects of this
disease and each year over a hundred thousand young women, men and children are newly
diagnosed with lupus, the great majority of whom are women of childbearing age; and
Whereas, medical research efforts into lupus and the discovery of safer, more effective
treatments for lupus patients are under-funded in comparison with diseases of comparable
magnitude and severity; and
Whereas, many physicians worldwide are unaware of symptoms and health effects of lupus,
causing people with lupus to suffer for many years before they obtain a correct diagnosis
and medical treatment; and
Whereas, there is a deep, unmet need worldwide to educate and support individuals.and
families affected by lupus; and
Whereas, there is an urgent need to increase awareness in communities worldwide of the
debilitating impact of lupus;
NOW, Therefore, Be It Resolved that 10 May 2014 is hereby designated as World Lupus Day on
which lupus organizations around the globe call for increases in public and private sector funding for
medical research on lupus, targeted education programs for health professionals, patients and the public
and worldwide recognition of lupus as a significant public health issue.
Proclaimed This Day, 10 May 2014
Charitable Registration Number
10764 9410 RR0001 Life without lupus
=s0 W
Honorary Patron: Lupus Foundation 294 Ridge Road N Box 687
Ridgeway ON LOS 1NO
The Hon.David C. Onley of Ontario (800)368-8377 ON Only
Lieutenant Governor of Ontario (905)894-4611
'. (905)894-4616
e® lupusont @vaxxine.com
Website:www.vaxxine.com/lupus
Serving Ontario since 1977(Inc.)
Whereas, lupus is an autoimmune disease that can cause severe damage to the tissue and
organs in the body and, in some cases, death; and
Whereas, more than five million people worldwide suffer the devastating effects of this
disease and each year over a hundred thousand young women, men and children are newly
diagnosed with lupus, the great majority of whom are women of childbearing age; and
Whereas, medical research efforts into lupus and the discovery of safer, more effective
treatments for lupus patients are under-funded in comparison with diseases of comparable
magnitude and severity; and
Whereas, many physicians worldwide are unaware of symptoms and health effects of lupus,
causing people with lupus to suffer for many years before they obtain a correct diagnosis
and medical treatment; and
Whereas, there is a deep, unmet need worldwide to educate and support individuals and
families affected by lupus; and
Whereas, there is an urgent need to increase awareness in communities worldwide of the
debilitating impact of lupus;
Now, Therefore, Be It Resolved that October 2014 is hereby designated as "October is Lupus
Awareness Month" during which lupus organizations around the globe call for increases in public and
private sector funding for medical research on lupus,targeted education programs for health professionals,
patients and the public and worldwide recognition of lupus as a significant public health issue.
Proclaimed this day during October 2014
Charitable Registration Number
10764 9410 RR0001 Life without lupus
ElginiCcount.y
Mayor Bernie Wiehle and Members of West Elgin Council
22413 Hoskins Line, P.O. Box 490,
Rodney, Ontario NOL 2CO
Rel IvwX att&wtb-then6d-AmuLet;LwardP,w.' Qjpw Cod,f raurananwvet
On behalf of Elgin County Council, it is my pleasure to invite you to Elgin County's Annual Warden's Charity
Golf Tournament. Over the past few years the County of Elgin has experienced significant downsizing in the
manufacturing sector putting a strain on agencies that support families in need. It is our mission to support the
United Way by setting an example as a leader in the category of public sector contributors to help bridge the
gap in contributions for our community.
The seven municipalities within Elgin County (Town of Aylmer, Municipality of Bayham, Municipality of Central
Elgin, Municipality of Dutton-Dunwich, Municipality of West Elgin, Township of Malahide, Township of
Southwold) are working together to make this event a success. We are asking for your support by joining us
at the tournament as a sponsor and participant to help us to not only raise funds for this worthy cause but also
to have some fun, socialize and network with others who recognize the importance of giving back to the
community.
The Warden's Charity Golf Tournament is being organized by the Elgin County United Way Special Events
Committee (ECUWSEC) and all proceeds will be directed to the Elgin-St. Thomas United Way. I am excited to
announce that this year's tournament will take place at Kettle Creek Golf and County Club located in Port
Stanley, Ontario in the Municipality of Central Elgin, and is a place near and dear to me, as it was formerly
known as the "Marr Farm". So save the Date: Wednesday, June 18, 2014. Registration will begin at 9:00
a.m. with a shot gun start at 10:30 a.m.
Our new tournament brochure has been included for you to review. There are many levels of sponsorship
available to suit any budget. Last year your organization generously supported this event by golfing. If you
can take it to the next level, please consider the people you will be helping by doing so. Even a small amount
can go a long way!
The cost to play this year is $125 per player but for a limited time, we do offer an Early Bird Discount! Register
and pay by May 1, 2014 and be eligible to receive the benefit of the discounted price of$115.00 per player.
Limited spaces are available so sponsorship and registration will not be confirmed until your payment is
received in full. The past two tournaments were sold out with a wait list, so don't be disappointed.
We thank you in advance for your support and we look forward to hearing from you soon.
David Marr
Warden, County of Elgin
County of Elgin
Administrative Services
454 Sunset Drive
St.Thomas,ON N5F1 5V1
Phone:519-631-1460
www.elgincounty.ca
e