1976 Road Committee Minutes
COUNTY OF ELGIN ROAD COMMITTEE
FIRST REPORT
DECEMBER SESSION
1976
TO THE WARDEN AND MEMBERS OF THE COUNTY OF ELGIN COUNCIL:
YOUR ROAD COMMITTEE REPORTS AS FOLLOWS:
1. The Culverts on Road 52 over Kettle Creek have been backfilled and
the Creek has been diverted through the culverts. Earthmoving and
dragline work is continuing as weather conditions permit.
2. We have received a request from the Elgin County Board of Education
requesting that the speed limit on county roads be reduced from
60 miles per hour to 50 miles per hour. There is a sizeable cost of
changing signs on 160 miles of 60 miles per hour which would have to
be duplicated in September of 1977 when all speed signs ill" the
Province are scheduled to be changed to metric units.. In an effort
to eliminate this duplication of costs the Minister of Transportation
and Connnunications has been contacted to determine if a change to
metric signing in the Spring of 1977 would be feasible.
WE RECOMMEND:
That the Resolution of the County of Lambton be endorsed. The
Resolution requested the Minister of Attorney-General to introduce
heavier court penalties for stealing or damaging road signs. Your
Connnittee: also believes that heavier penalties for the possession of
stolen si.gns should be imposed.
All Of Which Is Respectfully Subm:itted.
f
t
CHAIRMAN
ST. T1:l0MA.S, ONTARIO.
DECEMBER B, 1976.
"PAGE 1.
Decelllber B, 1976 at 10 :00 A.M. with an lllelllber s pre sent. A1 so pre sent, Fran\<
THE COUNTY OF ELGIN ROAD COMMITTt.E MET at the MUnicipal BUilding on
Clarke.
THE MlNUTES OF THE MEETING OF NOVEMBER 10 were read and approved.
(1) winter control had been heavier to date than usual. 50 rolls of snow
THE ENGINEER REPORTED AS FOLL~S:
(2) work waS continuing on Road 52 with the cree\< having been diverted.
MUck from the old channel near the West ban\< waS being excavated and
fence had been purchased and waS being erected.
bac\<filled with earth.
(3) Tree cutting waS underway on Roads 29, 31 and 52.
(4) StOrm drains were being placed on Road 30 and on Road 43 near cookS Bridge.
(5) A survey ot signS needed for replacelllent waS underway.
(6) The Ministry of Transportation and cororounicatiOns had reported that cracking
in structural steel had developed in bridges of the same type as on Road 45
()'\Ter the Otter Creek. One' such crack had been found and the Ministry of
Transportation and crnmnunicatiOns were to make a comPlete inspection of
the steel using their special bridge inspector crane. $ 5,000 had been
added to the county Maintenance Allocation to cover inspection costs.
(7) Graveling waS continuing on the shoulders on Road 30 and the second pile
of gravel crushed at the Pleasant Valley pit. ApproximatelY 15,000 yards
had been.rem()'\Ted and approxit\latelY 50% of the first pile placed.
(B) It waS e~ected that all November accountS could be paid in 1976 but very
feW if any of the Decelllber accountS as the lllaXimUlll expenditUre would be
reached when wages had been paid.
(9) The Ministry ot Transportation and cororounicatiOns had re<tuested that Labour
overhead Charges be distributed to the varioUS Road Ledger AccountS in 1976
rather than lumping thelll together in an overhead Account as had been done in
the past. BecaUse of thiS the Report on 1976 expenditures would not likely
be available for the January 1977 council Session.
ST. THOMAS, ONTARIO.
DECEMBER 8, 1976.
'PAGE 2.
(10) 5 truck tarps had been purchased to comply with the neW regulations
requiring tarps of loads which takeS effect January 1, 1977.
(11) Randy Greer had been taken on regular staff as a ClasS 11 Labourer.
(12) Information received at the MUnicipal Engineers Association meeting in
Ottawa indicated that the Ministry of Transportation and comrounicabions
waS planning to proceed with metrification of road signs.
"MOVED BY:
L. R. CARROLL
SECONDED BY: M. A. Sc;HA;FER
THAT Wt. APPROVE THE FOLLOW11<G PAYL1.STS FOR PAYMENT:
PAYL1.ST NUMBER 55 AMOUNTING TO $
PAYLIST NUMBER 56 AMOUNTING TO $
PAYLIST NUMBER 57 AMOUNT1.NG TO $
PAYLIST NUMBt.R 58 AMOUNTING TO $
PAYLIST NUMBER 59 AMOUNTING TO $
PAYLIST NUMBER 60 AMOUNTING TO $
32,503.64
4,495.62
30,432.70
42,982.11
218.14
47,087.96.
CARRIED."
(a) County ot Lambton requesting council's endorsement for increased penaltieS
CORRESPONDt.NCE WAS READ FROM:
for theft of road signs.
"MOVED BY: G. W. MONTEI TR
SECONDED BY: L. R. CARROLL
THAT WE RECOMMEND TO COUNTY cOUNCIL THAT THE RESOLUTION OF TRE COUNTY
OF LAMBTON RE INCREASED PENALTIES FOR 'J1{E REMOVAL OR THEFT OF ROAD
SIGN:S BE ENDORSED AND THAT PENALTIES FOR POSSESS1.0N OF STOLEN ROAD
SIGNS BE INCREASED AS WELL.
CARRIED."
(b) Village of port Stanley regarding rezoning land on Highway 4.
(c) Township of southWOld, yarmouth and Town of Aylmer with notices of minor
(d) Ministry ot Transportation and communications with Reorganization Notice.
variance s.
ST. THOMAS, ONTARIO.
DECEMBER 8, 1976.
PAGE 3.
~.
(e) Canadian Transport commission stating that signals were warranted on the
L & P S division of the C.N.R. and Gounty Road 52 and requesting a detailed
estimate from the C.N.R.
TRE ENGINEt.R REPORTED ALL PROPERT'! required on Roads 31 and 52 for
widening had been acquired and that land purchase waS continuing on Road 16.
A Draft Deed had been received on the Hyde property on Road 23 in port Stanley
containing a hold harmless claUse with the county for any earth slides, etc.
Elm Street and centennial Ave. in Yarmouth frOtll Harry Axford and the sale of a
Discussion waS laid over until January on the purchase of widening on
parcel of land on Road 45 in southwo1d to hilll.
Concession V, southwo1d, being one of the lotS sold by the county to E. Atcheson
A REQUEST TO cOUNT'! LAND DIVISION COMMITTEE for a severance on \..(It 7,
waS discussed. The Engineer was instructed to inform the County Land Division
that the County waS not allowing any severance on the other lot they had sold or
the lots they would sell in the Spring.
Board had approved the HazelWood subdivision in port Stanley subject to a right
THE CHAIRMAN N'D THE ENGINEER REPORTED that the central Elgin Planning
of way being provided between Highway 4 and County Road 23.
of County Road 35 and 45. The Engineer waS instructed to reply stating a larger
stop sign would be placed and speed bumps installed next summer unleSS there waS
CORRESPONDENCE WAS READ FROM Mrs. E. Pearce regarding the intersection
a reaSon why they should not be.
requesting that the Road committee give consideration to the changing of the
CORRESPONDENCE WAS READ FROM the Elgin county Board of Education
speed limit on its 60 lllile per hour roads to 50 mile per hour.
S't. 'tilQW\S, 01l'tl\R10.
DEC~BER B, 1916.
'PAGE 4.
. nO.
h ~'nistrY of 'transportat~on a
c~ittee decided to re~uest t e ~
. s"stelll in the Spring
.' t 'ble to change to the llletr~C J
communicatiOns ~f ~t waS eas~
d f 2 sign changeovers.
h ~ 11 of 1911 to elilllinate the nee or
~athe~ than t e ~a
untS ~v~ - 1
. SubsidY /!llt0 r in 191 ·
communicat~ons . 1916 would not occu f $ 1,91,3,000 'l/S
. FUnd cut ~n d subsidY 0
the construct~on , _ ~1,n_OOO in 1916 an · telY $ 603,000
_ ",1"'\ ..T~ '-II _, ~",n1:o}{l:ro.a
'fl{E ~Gll'lEt.R REPOR'tED 't\11l.'t 'tilE ~inistrY ot 'transportatiOn and
.> . d' tionS were that
&^~ 1911 were being set anu ~n ~ca
~~~imated allocation
$ 1,699,000 in 19/0. ,w-
to $ 630,000 exclusive of Drainage p,.ssess,"";:-'t.".
"MO\TED BY.:
M. A. SCrtAfER
SECOl'lDED BY: S, J. GLO'fER
'tW>'t I,1E p,.DJOURl'l 'to JJ\l'lUl\RY 12, 1911 p,.'t 10 :00 p,..~.
CARR1ED."
ST. THOMAS, ONT:1\RI0.
NOVEMBER 10, 1976.
~,
November 10, 1976 a~ 10:00 A.M. All lllelllbers except Reeves Wilson and Caverly
TlIE cOUNTY OF ELGIN ROAD COMMITTEE MET at the Municipal Building on
~ere present. Also present, Frank Clarke.
TlIE MINUTt.S OF THE MEETINGS OF October 13 and 0ctober 20 ~ere read
and app-roved.
1. The Kettle Creek culvert and Bin Walls on Road 52 had been assembled and
THE ENGINEER REPORTED ON THE WORK TO DATE AS FOLLOWS:
2. Road 30 had been paved althOugh SOllle earth and gravel shouldering remained
backfilling ~aS continuing as ~aS ~ork on the approach grade.
3. Clean up ~ork and shouldering remained on Road 34 ~est ot Belmont.
as ~ell a& repairs to the Patterson Culvert.
4. Sanders and Sno~ plo~s ~ere being installed. Routes had been designated
and a night cre~ organized. 2 "V" Snow plo~s had been purchased frOlll
Galion to replace a plo~ borro~ed from Watters BroS. some years ago and
for Truck #70 ~hich ~aS equipped ~ith a one ~aY plo~ only.
5. Sand piles ~ould be remixed ~ith salt next ~eek and sno~ fence erected as
soon as possible.
6. The rear end on Truck #55 had to be replaced.
7. some backhoe ~ork at the Elgin Manor in Aylmer ~ould be done next ~eek.
A surveY of Guide SignS ~aS being made to determine those that required
-replacing-
storm damage along the Great Lakes by the Ministry of Natural Re&OurceS and
THE ENGINt.ER REPORTED ON A MEETING in LOndon regarding the Report on
Environment Canada.
ST. THOMJ~S, ONTARIO.
NOVEMBER 10, 1976.
PAGE 2.
"MOVED BY: M. A. SCHAFER
SECONDED BY: S. J. GLOVER
THAT THE FOLLOWING PAYLISTS BE APPROVED FOR PAYMENT.
P AYLI ST # 50 AMOUNTING TO $
PAYLIST # 51 AMOUNTING TO $
PAYLIST # 52 AMOUNTING TO $
PAYLIST # 53 AMOUNTING TO $
PAYLIST # 54 AMOUNTING TO $
32,709.39
7,700.24
31,197.11
192, 343 .93
165.54
CARRIED."
CORRESPONDENCE WAS READ FROM FRANK COWmN CO. stating they would no
longer write Workmen's Compensation Insurance, Ontario Municipal Board - Hearings
regarding County Land Severances were noted. Tenders for a Portion of Lot 20,
Concession X, Yarmouth on Road 52 were opened and were as attached.
"MOVED BY: L. R. CARROLL
SECONDED BY: G. W. MONTEITH
THAT WE RECOMMEND TO COUNTY COUNCIL THAT A BY-LAW BE PASSED AUTHORIZING
THE WARDEN AND CLERK TO SIGN A DEED TO NORFOLK-ELGIN PROPERTIES INC. FOR
PART # 1 REFERENCE PLAN 11R-1110 BEING PART OF LOT 20, CONCESSION X,
YARM:OUTH. THE PURCHASE PRICE TO BE $ 11,300.
CARRIED."
THE .MEETING ADJOURNED FOR DINNER.
AFTER DINNER the sale to Harry Axford of a Portion of land purchased
from Dewey Siple on Road 45 in Southwo1d was discussed. It was pointed out that
Mr. Axford owned property on Centennial Ave. and Elm Street that widE~ning would
be required from in due course. The Engineer was instructed to obtain further
information.
THE ENGINEER REPORTED that all property needed for road widening between
Finga1 and Watson Corners on Road 16 had been purchased and that purchasing between
Watson Corners and Road 14 was continuing. 2 properties, Andrews and Campbe11s,
remained to be: acquired on Road 52 and one property on Road 31. The sale of the
Crane property on Road 14 was discussed.
ST. THOMAS, ONTARIO.
NOVEMBER 10, 1976.
PAGE 3.
"MOVED BY: S. J.. GLOVER
SECONDED BY: M. A. SCHAFER
THAT WE RECOMMEND TO COUNTY COUNCIL THAT A BY-LAW BE PASSED AUTHORIZING
THE 'WARDEN AND CLERK TO SIGN A DEED TO LOWER THAMES VALLEY CONSERVATION
AUTHORITY FOR THE PROPERTY OWNED BY THE COUNTY OF ELGIN IN LOT 1,
CONCESSION V, SOUTHWOLD, KNOWN AS THE CRANE PROPERTY AND CONVEYED TO
THE COUNTY IN DEED NUMBER 81245.
CARRIED."
THE ENGINEER PRESENTED THE LATEST PLAN of the Ministry of Transportation
and Communications regarding the joining of the St. Thomas Expressway and County
Road 52 - for the review of the Cvuuuittee. The Cvuuuittee were of thE~ opinion
that the 70 & 110 curves shown could be improved and that if the Ministry of
Transportation and Communications did not include the section of the Expressway
between Road 26 and the Wellington Road, the alignment should be changed to provide
a continuous road from the road east of Talbotville to thE~ diversion of Road 52.
The proposed Hazelwood Subdivision in Port Stanley was discussed and
the Cvuuuittee fel t that a road between Highway 4 and County Road 23 would be required
when the phase of the Subdivision on Road 23 was developed. The Committee requested
that its members on the Central Elgin Planning Board conVE~y their opinion to the
Board.
THE ENGINEER WAS INSTRUCTED to contact the Ministry of Transportation and
Communications regarding their plans for the Aylmer By-Pass from Highway 73 easterly
to Highway 3 as Deputy Reeve Glover pointed out that traffic congestion at the
Highway 73 - Highway 3 was increasing as time past.
"MOVED BY:
L. R. CARROLL
SECC~DED BY: G. D. SIMPSON
THAT WE ADJOURN TO DECEMBER 8 AT 10:00 A.M.
CARRIED."
G\ ~'., L
,/:J~/: ',/." ac ,/
"- \.P" "-
CtlAJ.RMAN
COUNTY OF ELGIN
TENDERS FOR PORTION OF LOT 20, CONCESSION X, YARMOUTH
BEING PART # 1 REFERENCE PLAN llR-1110
NOVEMBER 10, 1976
1. Norfolk Elgin Properties Inc., $ 11,300..00
R. R. # 4,
St. Thomas, Ontario.
z. Percy Robinson, $ 8,000..00
R. R. # 8,
St. Th~nas, Ontario.
3. R. E. Atcheson, $ 7,300.03
R. R. # 7,
St. Thomas, Ontario.
4. Ernest C. Bridge, $ 5,758.00
46 Regent Street,
St. ThOlnas, Ontario.
5. Ray Reid, $ 4,600.00
R. R. # 8,
St. Thomas, Ontario.
6. M. W. Ble:rdan, $ 4,500.00
22A Hamnond Street,
St. Thomas, Ontario.
7. John Hilliker, $ 2,500.00
39 Malakoff Street,
St. Thomas, Ontario.
/'
,//
cOUNT'{ OF ELGIN ROAD cCJMM'lTTEE
~ -----= . -
FIRST REPORT
---- --
NOVEMBER SESSION
19-,16
r\
TO THE WARDEN AND MEMBERS OF THE COUNT'{ OF ELGIN COUNCIL:
1. Erection of Kettle creek culve~t and retaining walls on Road 52 have
yOUR ROAD CQMMlTTt.E REPORTS AS FOLLOWS:
been completed. Gravel backtilling is continuing as is g~ading work
on the approaches. Good weather will be ~equired fo~ at least several
weeks to allow for substantial completion of grading work.
2. That Asphalt Paving on Road 30 north of Road 52 in Yarmouth TownshiP
haS been completed.
3. That a used 1971 GMC Tandelll Truck has been purchased for $ 4,000 and
a County Sande~ placed on it to ~eplace a County Truck which waS
scrapped last Spring.
WE RECOMMEND:
1. That a By_LaW be passed autho~izing the Warden and Clerk to sign a
Deed to Norfolk-Elgin prope~ties Inc. for a portion of Lot 7, concession
V southwold and shown as Parts 1 & 2 on Reference plan llR-986. The
sale price waS $ 9,600 less Real Estate commission.
The Lot had been previouSlY sold by tender to Hugo and Donna Reusch
last Spring, but the ReuschllAdlliaulted on their payment. The adjacent
lot waS sold to Eltriede Atcbeson by tender at $ 6,300.
2. That a By_LaW be passed authorizing the Warden and Clerk to sign a
Deed to Nortolk-Elgin properties InC. for Pa~t of Lot 20, concession
X Yarmouth as shown on Reference plan nR-l nO as Pa~t 1. The sale
p~ice is $ 11,300 which waS the highest of 7 tende~s received. The
area of pa~t is app~oximatelY 2.5 ac~eS and is located on a co~ner
pu~chased tor the~~dening of Road 52 approximatelY 1 mile east of
Highway 71+.
... continued ...
\
~
'Page 21,:
1'\ O\TEMBER ~, E S S 1 01'\
1916
3.
'that a By~LaW be passed authorizing the Vlarden and Clerk to sign a
Deed to the LOwer 'thameS Valley conservation Authority tor a portion
of LOt 1 concession V southwold being approxilllatelY B acres on county
Road 14 opposite Road 13 (ShackletOn) which was deeded to the County
('\.n.t' The LoVIe 1: rrha1l'l.e Si
of Elgin by the university of Vlesterl\ ~,. ar~o.
.~thoritY is in a better position than the CountY
._ _ r\ ~. ..,...npxty to the
All ot Vlhich Is RespectfullY Subro.itted.
----
Ct1Al~
COUNTY OF ELGIN
WEST ELGIN INSPECTION
November 4, 1976.
1. Leave Court House at 9:00 A.M.
2. Road 33 SA ., Kains Bridge and Hill
St. Thomas Suburban Road.
3. Southwold Township roads to County Road 45.
4. County Road 45 at Kettle Creek CuI vert - re surfacing required 1977..
5. Inspection County Garage.
6. Highway 4 to Road 23.
7. Road 23 - Ha.zelwood Subdivision.
8. Road 23 to Road 20 to Fingal.
9. Coffee - To~mship Office.
10. Road 16 - Fingal to Road 14. Property purchase and final Engineering
underway.
11. Road 16 - Road 14 to Road 15 - resurfacing required.
12. Road 8 to Du.tton.
13,. Urban work on Road 8 in Dutton completed 1976.
Resurfacing on Road 15 from Road 8 to Road 2.
14. Road 2 - through West Lorne to Rodney.
15. Road 3 to New Glasgow.
16. Road 3 - Sou.th of Highway 3 completed 1976.
17. Erosion Control New Glasgow.
18. Road 3 & 6 - to Clachan for dinner.
19. Road 6 & 3 to Wardsville Bridge.
20. Inspection of Walker, Tates and Middlemiss Bridge using County Roads
9 & 5.
21. Township of Southwold Road and Road 18 to Road 19.
22. Road 19 - Poor condition to Highway 3.
23. Highway 3 to Talbotville.
24. Route of Expressway, Construction of Road 52 and 31.
25. Return to Court House using Road 29 and 26 SA (St. George Street).
('I.'
"
\
//
/'
,\
,I'
~' i
COUNTY OF ELGIN
- '
~ST ELGIN INSPECTION
October 28, 1976
1. Leave Court House at 9:00 A.M.
2. Highway 3 to Road 28.
3. Road 28 to Road 45 _ road between Elm Street (Road 56) and Road 45 -
assumed (and graveled) by County in 1976.
4. Road 45 _ Asphalt Resurfacing frOtll Highway 4 to Cook'S corners 1976.
Portion between Cook'S corners and Road 36 scheduled for 1977.
5. Road 36 to County Gravel Pits at Pleasant Valley. Purchases in 1975
and 1976 frOtll Laur Estate, Whitney's and Higgs enlarged the area frOtll
73 acres to approximately 140 acres. The Pit is supplying the County
crushed gravel needs in Central Elgin and East Elgin south of Highway 3.
6. Reeve Caverly's.
7. Road 45 to Road 43.
8. Road 43 _ Cook and phi11more Bridges.
9. Road 38 to Highway 19 - Engineering work underway.
10. Port Burwell _ Erosion - Road 42 east of Port Burwell.
11. port Burwell Harbour Dredging and Erosion of Lake Bank.
12. Port Burwell - Dinner.
13. Highway 19 to Road 44.
14. Road 44 to Road 46.
15. Resurfacing 1976 - North of Gorinth.
16. To Elgin Manor Site - Aylmer.
17. Elm and Beech Streets in Aylmer.
18. Road 32 _ police College Road - programmed for early construction.
19. Road 52, 49 and 48 in South Dorchester.
20. Reeve Wilson's.
21. To Road 37 South and North Dorchester Boundary.
23. Road 31, _ Urban Construction Belmont, Storm Drain, Curb and Gutter and
22. Road 37 to Belmont.
,~
24. Road 34 _ We,st of Village of Belmont - Resurfacing Gounty Boundary Road
\ Paving 1976.
between Elgin and Middlesex. Middlesex County pays 50% of cost.
... continued ...
~
>"
y,hS't ELGl~ I~SPECTI0~
To Road 30 (Radio Road).
.' ot "o,:k from 1915.
. 1), d 30 (Radio Road) cont1.nuat1.on
const~uct~on ~oa
1 C k culvertS to replace
Road 52 constructiOn - Ratt e ree
carrs 1\ridge _ 2 culvertS 90 teet long 50 foot span - steel bin
.' 11 ~te,:ial costS (p.rmco Canada) $ 120,628.
"all reta1.n1.ng "a s.
Road 52 "esterlY to St. Thoro.as E,q>ress"aY and Road 31 constructiOn
~
25.
26.
21.
28.
29.
prog,:~wmed tor 1911.
Road 52 trolll Road 26 1::" .-
of ,Transpo,:tatiOn and communicatiOns as p~.-
01 ot St. 'thoroas Suburban
Road 26 _ St. George Street under contr
30.
Road coromission.
31. RetUrn to Court ROUse.
ST. THOMAS, ONTARIO,
OCTOBER 20, 1976.
PAGE 1.
THE COUNTY OF ELGIN ROAD COMMITTEE MET at the Municipal Building at
3:00 P. M. on 0ctober 20, 1976 in conjunction with County Council. All members
were present.
THE ENGINEER REPORTED THAT THE County Solicitor, Mr. Hennessey had
requested that in the sale of part of Lot 29 & 30, Block 16, Plan 149 Dutton,
2 separate Deeds be drawn one to John Crowe and one to Lorraine Crowe.
AFTER DISCUSSION ...
"MOVED BY: G. W. MONTE I TH
SECONDED BY: L. R. CARROLL
THAT WE RECOMMEND TO COUNTY COUNCIL THAT BY-LAW #2426 AUTHORIZING
THE $ALE OF A PORTION OF LOT 29 & 30 BLOCK 16 REGI STERED PLAN 146
DUTTON AS SHOWN 'IA\S PARTS 1 & 3 ON REFERENCE PLAN llR-986 TO JOHN
CROWE BE RESCINDED.
CARRIED."
"MOVED BY: M. A. SCHAFER
SECONDED BY: S. J. GLOVER
THAT WE RECOMMEND TO COUNTY COUNCIL THAT A BY-LAW BE PASSED AUTHORIZING
THE WARDEN AND CLERK TO SIGN A DEED TO JOHN W. CROWE FOR A PORTION OF
LOT 30 BLOCK 16 REGISTERED PLAN 146, DUTTON AS SHOWN AS PART 1 ON
REFERENCE PLAN llR-986.
CARRIED."
"MOVED BY: G. W. MONTEI TH
SECONDED BY: L. R. CARROLL
THAT WE RECOMMEND TO COUNTY COUNCIL THAT A BY-LAW BE PASSED AUTHORIZING
THE WARDEN AND CLERK TO SIGN A DEED TO LORRAINE DALE CROWE FOR A PORTION
OF LOT 29 BLOCK 16 REGISTERED PLAN 146, DUTTON AS SHOWN AS PART 3 ON
REFERENCE PLAN llR-986.
CARRIED."
ST. THOMAS, ONTARIO,
OCTOBER 20, 1976.
PAGE 2.
THE ENGINEER REPORTED THAT Keith & Pincombe Real Estate Brokers had
forwarded 2 offers for Parts 1 & 2 Reference Plan llR-967 in Lot 7, Concession
V Southwold - Ron Atcheson for $ 7,700. and Norfolk Elgin Properties Inc. for
$ 9,600. with condition that the parcel could not be divided.
"MOVED BY: G. D. SIMPSON
SEOONDED BY: M. A. SCHAFER
THAT WE RECOMMEND TO COUNTY COUNCIL THAT A BY-LAW BE PASSED AUTHORIZING
THE WARDEN AND CLERK TO SIGN A DEED TO NORFOLK-ELGIN PROPERTIES INC. FOR
A PORTION OF LOT 7, CONCESSION V, SOUTHWOLD ~~HOWN AS PARTS #1 & 2
ON REFERENCE PLAN llR-986 AT $ 9,600. LESS REAL ESTATE COMMISSION.
CARRIED."
The Engineer reported that a Tandem Truck had been located and
purchased.
"MOVED BY: G. W. MONTEI TH
SEca~DED BY: G. D. SIMPSON
THAT WE PURCHASE A USED 1971 G.M.C. TANDEM TRl:ICK SERIAL # CE6l3Y186346
FROM DWIGHT DAVIS OF R. R. # 7, TILLSONBURG FOR $ 4,000. PLUS PROVINCIAL
SALES TAX SUBJECT TO MINI$TRY OF TRANSPORTATION AND COMMUNICATIONS
APPROVAL.
CARRIED."
CORRESPONDENCE WAS READ FROM MR. DERRICK KING, of the Ministry of
Transportation, and Communications regarding the Ministry's plan for changing
the St. Thomas! Expressway into a 2 lane facilitate and stating that redesign
of intersections, etc. would be necessary. He also stated that the Ministry
would assume Road 52 between Talbotville and Road 26 and requested County
approval for the assumption.
ST. THOMA.S, ONTARIO,
OCTOBER 20, 1976.
PAGE 3.
"MOVED BY:
L. R. CARROLL
SECONDED BY: M. A. SCHAFER
THAT WE HAVE NO OBJECTION TO THE ASSUMPTION BY THE MINISTRY OF
TRANSPORTATION AND COMMUNICATIONS OF COUNTY ROAD 52 FROM HIGHWAY 4
AT TJ~LBOTVILLE EASTERLY AS NECESSARY TO ALLOW THE MINISTRY OF
TRANSPORTATION AND COMMUNICATIONS TO BUILD THE ST. THOMAS EXPRESSWAY.
CARRIED."
"MOVED BY:
G. W. MONTEITH
SECONDED BY: L. R. CARROLL
THAT WE ADJOURN TO NOVEMBER 10 AT 10 :00 A.M.
CARRIED."
_~~jlY;L
, .
CHAIRMAN
COUNTY OF ELGIN ROAD COMMITTEE
SECOND REPORT
OCTOBER SESSION
1976
TO THE WARDEN AND MEMBERS OF THE COUNTY OF ELGIN COUNCIJG:
YOUR ROAD COMMITTEE REPORTS AS FOLLOWS:
WE RECOMMEND:
1. (a) That By-Law #2426 which authorized the Warden and Clerk to sign
a deled to John W. Growe for parts of Lots 29 and 30 Block 16
Registered Plan 149 Village of Dutton as shown as parts 1 &: 3 on
Reference Plan 11R-986 be rescinded.
(b) That a By-Law be passed authorizing the Warden and Clerk to sign' "-
a deed to John W. Crowe for Part of Lot 30 Block 16 Registered
Plan 149 Village of Dutton as shown as Part 1 on Reference Plan
IIR-986.
(c) That A By-Law be passed authorizing the Warden and Clerk to sign
a deed to Lorraine Dale Crowe for Part of Lot 29 Block 16 Registered
Plan 149 Village of Dutton as shown as Part 3 on Reference Plan
IIR-986.
The Crowes had requested that the property be registered as
separate deeds.
All Of Which Is Respectfully Submitted.
CHAIRMAN
~.
COUNTY OF ELGIN ROAD COMMITTEE
.11,
1
')
;\
FIRST REPORT
OCTOBER SESSION
1976
TO THE WARDEN AND MEMBERS OF THE COUNTY OF ELGIN COUNCIL:
YOUR ROAD COMlvIITTEE REPORTS AS FOLLOWS:
1. Erection of culverts on Road 52 over I~ttle Creek continues with the
loose assembly of both culver~s nearly complete. Considerable
tightening of bolts and erection of steel wing walls remains.
WE RECOMMEND:
1. That County Council inspection of roads and other projects be on
October 28 East Elgin and November 4 West Elgin to leave Court House
both days at 9:00 A.M.
The East: Elgin inspection will include the Elgin Manor at Aylmer.
All Of Which Is Respectfully Submitted.
CHAIRMAN
I
ST. THOMAS, ONTARIO.
OCTOBER 13, 1976.
PAGE 1.
10:00 A.M., October 13, 1976 with all members present. Also Frank Clarke,
THE COUNTY OF ELGIN ROAD COMMITTEE MET at the Municipal Building at
Ministry of Transportation and communications.
THE MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF September 8 and 22 were read and
approved.
(1) Pavement Marking waS complete with exception of Road 30.
THE ENGINEER REPORTED ON THE WORK to date as follows:
(2) sweeping was continuing as necessary.
(3) culvert erection on Road 52 was continuing with one culvert erected.
(4) Top Soil had been stripped from the Ferguson property on the west side
of Kettle Creek and scraper work waS continuing on the east side.
(5) Top Soil would be stripped from the DeLouW and Kettle Creek Conservation
Authority property on Road 31 so that an early start on Road 31 could be
roade in 1977 as it was necessary to have a good road to the DeLouW p'!:operty
by June 15, 1977 so it would not interrupt Mr. DeLouW's strawberry crop
(6) ArmcO Canada had replaced several steel plates for the Patterson culvert on
sales.
Road 30 which had been failing for some time. No cause for the failure had
(7) Sand base work waS continuing on Road 30 and it waS hoped to pave the road
been ascertained.
south of the Patterson culvert before the end of the lllonth.
(8) A suitable tandelll truck had not yet been found and a search was being
undertaken for a "V" snow plow for Truck #70.
(9) Paving had been completed on Road 34 in Be11110nt and clean up work waS underway.
The Insurance company had been notified when minor flooding had occurred
because of a blocked catch basin in several basements in the heaVY rain of
last -week.
ST. THOMAS, ONTARIO,
OCTOBER 13, 1976.
P AG E 2.
"MOVED BY: S. J. GLOVER
SECONDED BY: L. R. CARROLL
THAT THE FOLLOWING PAYLISTS BE APPROVED FOR PAYMENT:
PAYLIST # 43 AMOUNTING TO $
PAYLIST # 45 AMOUNTING TO $
PAYLIST # 46 AMOUNTING TO $
PAYLIST # 47 AMOUNTING TO $
PAYLIST # 48 AMOUNTING TO $
PAYLIST # 49 AMOUNTING TO $
33,958.67
33,907.52
16,446.21
14,243.75
31,980.75
324,251.96
CARRIED."
CORRESPONDENCE WAS READ FROM
(a) Ministry of Transportation and Communications transferring Highway 4 in
Port Stanley to the Village of Port Stanley to facilitate the signing
of a connecting link agreement.
(b) Extendicare Nursing Home on Road 23 in Port Stanley giving particulars
of their storm drainage which will for the most part flow over the hill
to the west.
(c) Kettle CrE~ek Conservation Authority requesting a meeting to discuss a
pedestrian underpass on Road 52 at the Kettle Creek crossing. The
Committee felt that a meeting in the Spring would be more useful than at
the present time and the Engineer was to advise the Authority.
"MOVED BY: G. W. MONTEITH
SECONDED BY: M. A. SCHAFER
THAT WE RECOMMEND TO COUNTY COUNCIL THAT COUNTY COUNCIL ROAD
INSPECTION BE HELD ON OCTOBER 28 EAST ELGIN AND NOVEMBER 4, WEST ELGIN.
CARRIED."
THE ENGINEER REPORTED THAT LAND PURCHASE on Road. 31 and Road 52 was
proceeding well with only 4 properties not acquired. Land Purchase would start
on Road 16 West of Fingal shortly.
ST. THOMAS, ONTARIO,
OCTOBER 13, 1976.
PAGE 3.
THE ENGINEER REPORTED THAT OFFERS had been received of at least $ 8,000
for Lot 1 on Road 20 north of Shedden and an offer over that amount might be
forthcoming. The Engineer was instruc~ed to accept the best offer.
CORRESPONDENCE WAS READ FROM THE COUNTY OF ELGIN ROAD EMPLOYEES
Association stating that they had made a contribution of $ 200. to Eugene
Forsyth upon h:ls retirement and requesting a similar contribution from the
County.
"MOVED BY: G. W. MONTEITH
SECONDED BY: S. J. GLOVER
THAT WE MAKE A CONTRIBUTION OF $ 200. TO EUGENE FORSYTH UPON HIS
RETIREMENT FROM THE COUNTY ROAD DEPARTMENT DUE TO ILL HEALTH.
CARRIED."
"MOVED BY: L. R. CARROLL
SEC~~DED BY: G. D. SIMPSON
THAT WE PURCHASE A USED CONDOR MAN LIFT FROM ZNIDAR BROTHERS LTD.
OF TORONTO FOR $ 14,000. PLUS PROVINCIAL SALES TAX.
CARRIED .ff
THE ENGINEER REPORTED THAT NEGOTIATIONS were underway with the
Ministry of Transportation and Communications with regard to the conn.ection
between County Road 52 and the St. Thomas Expressway. It appeared that the
Ministry of Transportation and Communications were planning to assume. Road 52
between Highway 3 and Road 26 as part of the Expressway.
A primary concern of the Committee was the building of that portion of
Road 52 at the same time as the County completed the porti.on of Road 52 to the
east.
ST. THOMAS, ONTARIO.
OCTOBER 13, 1976.
PAGE 4.
lllileS of travel on countY roads and the updated construction Needs of the county
TflE ENGINEER PRESENTED THE ATTACHED REPORTS sho~ing daily vehicle
Road system.
"MOVED Wi:
M. A. SCRAFER
SECONDED BY: l.. R. CARROl.L
THAT ~E ADJOURN TO NOVEMBER 10, 1976 AT 10 :00 A.M.
CARRIED .n
CRt\IRMAN
c' _''''IV'''';''
COUNTY.OF ELGIN ROAD DEPARTMENT
DAILY VEHICLE MILES OF TRAVEL
(AS OF JANUARY 1 IN ANY YEAR)
YEAR
TOTAL VEHICLE
MILES PER DAY
VEHICLE MILES ON
% OF
TOTAL TRAVEL
VEHICLE MILES ON
TNADFOUATR'ROADS
-.. .........--""C'.~....--- ..........~....-'-
AT'\'&'Ol.r AT'&' DO A nc
EUJ.L:I\.('U.n.oL.L:I ~'\,V.cu.J.U
1976
226,749
187,828
82.8
38,921
1975
218,686
178,184
81.4
40,502
1974
216,919
174,184
80.3
42,551
1973
206,645
161,496
78.1
45,149
1972
196,699
126,909
104, 703
64.5
69,790
1971
174,652
60.0
69,949
Increase in total traffic from 1973 to 1976 - 9.7%
Increase in total traffic from 1975 t.Q 1976 - 3.7%
Increase in traffic on adequate road system 1973 to 1976 -' 16.3%
(Improvements on Wellington Road, etc. were reason for change on adequate road system in 1972 and prior.)
Increase in traffic on adequate road system 1975 to 1976
5.4%
,~f
% OF
TOT.f\L TF_A.VEL
17.2
18.6
19.7
21.9
35.5
40.0
If
~. t "
i
.....J
f~~.
ARTHUI~ J. GORDON
GENERAL SUPERINTENDENT
C. ROY DORAN
ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT
a. CONSTRUCTION SAFETY INSPECTOR
-.....:.......
ROBERT G. MOORE, B.Sc,. P.ENG.
ENGINEER AND ROAD SUPERINTENDENT
TELEPHONE 519' 631-5880
79 ST.ANl-EY ST.
(co,u,n HOUSE)
ST. THOMAS, ONT.
COUNTY OF ELGIN
1976 NEEDS STUDY UPDATE
May 3, 1976
Revision October 6, 1976
to agree with M.T.C. computer..
records.
1975 Update
1976 Update
Bridges
$ 2,040,000
$ 2,0~5,000
5,277,000
~ /,.,
Roads Now
Roads 1 - 5
8,991,000
4,273,000
11,031,000
11,635,000
Less Construction Objective for
Year
905,000 (9/,Q)
810,000 (8%)
Net Needs January 1 Following
Year
Less Objective for Year
$ 10,126,000 $ 10,825,000
$ 1,659,000' $ 362,000
$ 2,100,000 $ 2,230,000
237,000 279,000
6 to 10 Year Construction
Resurfacing
Net Needs January 1 Following
Year
$ 1,863,000.:'<<
$ < 1,951,000
Bridges on Local Roads
$ 1,384,000
$ 1,384,000
Total Needs Including Local Bridges
January 1 Following Year
$ 15,032,000
$ 14,522,000
t
;
l17 7 ~. rt~.
r
\.
~ ~Y6-
, r
g ';}o)
~~ h, c~
let 7 ~, <;{ J 0) Jlv
I~-~
d 9s1 l-vl
if 7'11 {)v--J
----~---
'\0...--.,---,..--
\'
I /5 (y...' (JI''j
/ /
J J 0 ~11 0#"))
\~)<" (\/l.k' C-;}x (1;(.\ 7 () I tV)) J.' c;;,,-).~l--7
f/ (,/ ,.r'(..-.....~ . ,
COUNTY OF ELGIN ROAD COMMITTEE
..:.
FIRST REPORT
SEPTEMBER SESSION
1976
TO THE WARDEN AND MEMBERS OF THE COUNTY OF ELGIN COUNCIL:
YOUR ROAD COMMITTEE REPORTS AS FOLLOWS:
1. Materials have been received from Armco Canada for the culverts over
Kettle Creek on Road 52 and sub assembly of steel plates on the ground
is well aW~anced. Concrete footing work is underway and erection of
plates will start shortly.
2. Paving en Road 34 at Belmont is underway. Minor trimming work remains
al so.
3. Construction continues on Road 30 at the Salt Creek Culvert and it is
hoped to reopen the road shortly.
WE RECOMMEND:
(1) That a By..Law be passed authorizing the Warden and Clerk to sign a Deed
to J. W. Crowe for part of Lots 29 and 30 Block 16 Registered Plan 149
Village of Dutton as shown as parts 1 & 3 on Reference Plan llR-986.
The property is that portion of the former Saunders Lumber Yard not
required for road allowance. The sale price was $ 11,500 less Real
Estate Cormnission.
(2) That the resolution from the City of Windsor regarding Amendments to
the Municipal Act regarding a vote of electors for road expenditures
be filed.
All Of Which Is Respectfully Subm:itted.
CHAIRMAN
I
([
ST. THOMAS, ONTARIO.
SEPTEMBER 22, 1976.
PAGE 1.
THE COUNT{ OF ELGIN ROAD COMMITTEE MET at 4:30 septelllber 22 in
,.,~,
conjunction with County council.
All lllembers were present except Reeves Glover, Caverly and Warden
Road 52 from the Kettle Creek crossing to Albert Andrew property and on Road 31.
THE ENGINEER REPORTED that he waS engaged in purchasing widening on
Schafer.
communications stating that they proposed to aSsume County Road 52 from Road 26
to Talbotville as part of the St. thomaS Expressway and requested permission to
CORRESPONDENCE WAS READ from the Ministry of Transportation and
property purchase and final engineering should be started.
THE ENGINEER REQUESTED C..."."ittee direction as to the next road that
survey on Road 52.
"MOVED BY: G. W. MONTEI T1l
St.C0NDED BY: G. D. SIMPSON
THAT THE ENGINEER BE INSTRUCTED TO PROCEED WITH ENGINEERING AND LAND
PURCHASE ON ROAD 16 FRO~ FlNGAL TO BUR WELLS CORNERS.
CARRIED ."
Seabrook of Lerner & AssociateS SolicitorS for PhylliS Ferguson that they had
received an appraisal from Egerton Associates for the property required for Road
THE ENGINEER REPORTED THAT he had been verballY informed by Mr. Robert
52 and 31 from her property in Lot 5, Concession X, Yarmouth.
in amount of $ 1,725 miscellaneoUS amount of $ 100 and would settle for that alllount
plus the cost of the appraisal ($ 650) plus legal fees in amount of $ 1,500 - $ 2,000.
The property waS valued at $ 12,000 and they requested fence allowances
After some discUssion
ST. THOMAS, ONTARIO.
SEPTEMBER 22, 1976.
PAGE 2.
"MOVED BY: L. R. CARROLL
SECONDED BY: G. W. MONTEITH
THAT TRl!. ENGINEER BE AUTHORIZED TO ACCEPT THE COUNTER OFFER OF P.
FERGUSON IN AMOUNT OF $ 13, B 25 FOR TRl!. PROPERTY REQUIRED FOR THE
DIVERSION OF ROAD 52 THROUGH Lot 5, CONCESSION X, yARMOUTH, pLUS
HER LEGAL FEES AND APPRAISAL COSTS.
CARRIED ."
Warden Schafer in attendance.
TRl!. ENGINEER REPORTED THAT Keith & PincOlIlbe had an offer frOlIl a Mrs.
Gail Webb for PartS 1 & 2 plan llR-967 for $ 7,500.
After diSCUssion
"MOVED BY: G. D. snlPSON
SECONDED BY: G. W. MONTEITH
THAT WE ACCEPT TRl!. OFFER OF MRS. GAlL WEBB FOR PART 1 & 2 pLAN
l1R-967 AT $ 7,500 PROVIDED A RIDER IS ADDED SO THAT TRl!. Lot
CANNOT BE DIVIDED.
CARRIED ."
Znidar BroS. of Toronto for $ 14,000 a reduction from their asking, price of
$ 16,500 and that it ~aS being checked over for early use in the erection of
THE ENGINEER REPORTED THAT Rl!. HAD pURCHASED the Condor Manlift from
the culvert at Kettle Creek on Road 52.
necessary to rent or purchase another tandelll truck for sanding work this ~inter.
As the County ~aS already renting 3 trucks he felt that a used truck should be
TRl!. ENGINEER REPORTED THAT as Truck #25 had been junked it ~ould be
purchased if a suitable one could be found at a reasonable price.
ST. THOMAS, ONTARIO.
SEPTEMBER 22, 1976.
PAGE 3.
"MOVED BY:
M. A. SCHAFER
~,
SEOONDED BY: L. R. CARROLL
THAT THE ENGINEER BE AUTHORIZED TO PURCHASE A USED TANDEM TRUCK
FOR A SANDER TRUCK.
OARRIED."
"MOVED BY:
G. D. SIMPSON
SEOONDED BY: G. W. MONTEITH
THAT WE ADJOURN TO OCTOBER 13, 1976 AT 10 :00 A.M.
OARRIED."
CHAIRMAN
ST. THOMAS, ONTARIO.
SEPTEMBER 8, 1976.
PAGE 1.
~
on september 8, 1976 as 10:00 A.M. All lllerobers except Reeve Caverly present.
THE COUNTY OF ELGIN ROAD COMMITTEE MET at the Municipal BUilding
T1:lE MINUTES OF AUGUST 12 were read and approved.
THE ENGINEER REPORTED ON THE WORK TO DATE AS FOLLOWS:
(1) Weed cutting had been stopped on August 27 as the budget waS about 8%
(2) A second applicatiOn of calcium chloride had been completed on gravel roads.
overspent. Most roads had been completed.
(3) sweeping waS continuing as needed.
(4) surface treatment had been completed with exception of South Dorchester
which would be done in the next 2 dayS.
(5) Pavement marking would start again sho'!:tly.
(6) DUmP TruC\< Inspection had been completed.
(7) The Galion Grader had been rolled and the cab smashed, but a neW cab had
(8) Sidewal\< work in Rodney had not been completed as the Union Gas Co. had laid
been purchased from Galion trolll their St. Thoroas yard for $ 650.
(10) curb and gutter work would be done this week in Belmont and it waS hoped to
(9) Paving on Road 13 at Bl<il\l":s Funeral Home remains to be done.
a line on the sidewalk location.
(11) The ~inistry of TransportatiOn and communications Auditors had audited the
pave next week.
(12) Grading work tor Kettle cree\< conservation Authority at their Dalewood
1975 e~?enditures.
Trailer Camp had been cOtllpleted and granular would be placed in the next feW
(13) The Salt creek Culvert on Road 30 had been erected and granular bac\<fill waS
weekS ·
underway. Grading work that had been done in 1975 had been shouldered,
trimmed and seeding waS underway.
ST. THOMAS" ONTARIO.
SEPTEMBER 8, 1976.
PAGE 2.
(14) Dragline work was continuing on Road 52 and footing excavation would
start on Thursday.
Culvert Plate was expected Friday and erection sub assembly would start
by next week.
(15) Land Purchase on Road 52 and 31 would be started as time permi.tted. It
would be necessary to move the high voltage line at the intersection of
Road 52 and 29 as it would be cheaper than moving a tower.
(16) A concr,ete gun had been purchased to facilitate repairs on thE! Middlemiss
and other bridges.
Tw.'O men had be"en working on Mosquito Control for several weeks and
Jack Elley had requested that they continue until September 17.
Go'bimat erosion protection had been placed by the Kettle Creek
Conservation Authority near ~he Union Pond and it seemed like a possible
reasonable cost erosio~hOd.
The Proposed Agreement between the County of Elgin and the St. Thomas
Sanitary Collection Services Ltd. had been referred back to the County Solicitor
for amendments.
THE WARDEN REPORTED THAT MR. MOFFAT OF ENVIRONMENT CANADA had met with
representatives of the Port Burwell Fishermen, Council, and other officials on
September 7 .regarding the dredging of the Port Burwell Harbour, but little if any
progress had been made. The Village had presented a plan in which if they were
given $ 200,,000 they would buy a dredge and keep the harbour dredgE~d and repaired.
"MOVED BY: M. A. SCHAFER
SECONDED BY: S. J. GLOVER
THAT THE FOLLOWING PAYLISTS
PAYLIST # 41 AMOUNTING TO $
PAYLIST # 42 AMOUNTING TO $
PAYLIST # 43 AMOUNTING TO
PAYLIST # 44 AMOUNTING TO $
BE APPROVED FOR PAYMENT:
35,363.67
327 . 27
161,506.87.
CARRIED."
ST. THOMAS, ONTARIO.
SEPTEMBER 8, 1976.
PAGE 3.
C~)RRESPONDENCE WAS READ FROM
(1) Township of Yarmouth and Southwold with Zoning By-Laws.
TUE ENGINEER REPORTED THAT the County Land Division Corrnn:ittee had
agreed to a severance on the lot in Lot 7, Concession V, Southwold, that
the County of Elgin had sold to Elfriede Atcheson.
The Engineer reported that he had after consultation with the
Chairman accepted an offer of $ 11,500 for the Saunders Lumber lots in Dutton.
"MOVED BY: L. R.CARROLL
SECONDED BY: G. W. MONTEITH
Tl~T WE RECOMMEND TO COUNTY COUNCIL THAT A BY-LAW BE PASSED
AUTHORIZING THE WARDEN AND CLERK TO SIGN A DEED TO JOHN W. CROWE
FOR PART OF LOTS 29 AND 30 BLOCK 16 REGISTERED PLAN 149 DUTTON
AS SHOWN AS PARTS 1 AND 3 ON REFERENCE PLAN ll-R-986. PURCHASE
PRICE TO BE $ 11,500 LESS REAL ESTATE COMMISSION.
CARRIED."
It was decided to sell the other 3 lots if the price was right.
It was decided to turn down an offer of $ 6,000 for one of the lots
on Road 20 in Lot 7, Concession V as the asking price was $ 10,000.
"MOVED BY: S. J. GLOVER
SECONDED BY: G. D. SIMPSON
Tf~T THE ENGINEER BE AUTHORIZED TO HAVE A REFERENCE PLAN PLACED
ON A PORTION OF LOT 20, CONCESSION X, YARMOUTH, NOT NEEDED FOR
ROAD ALLOWANCE AND TO TENDER THE PROPERTY FOR SALE.
CARRIED."
The Engineer reported that Miss Ferguson had requested another
appraisal on her property on Road 52 and it was hoped that this information
would be available by next week.
ST. THOMAS, ONTARIO.
SEPTEMBER 8, 1976.
PAGE 4.
"M~)VED BY: M. A. SCHAFER
SECONDED BY: L. R. CARROLL
TEIAT THE ENGINEER BE AUTHORIZED TO MAKE APPLICATIONS TO THE
MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION AND COMMUNICATIONS FOR INTERU1
PAYMENT OF SUBSIDY FOR 1976.
CARRIED."
"MOVED BY: G. W. MONTEITH
SECONDED BY: G. D. SIMPSON
THAT WE MAKE A CONTRIBUTION OF $ 100 TO MURRAY MITCHELL ON HIS
RETIREMENT FROM THE COUNTY ROAD DEPARTMENT.
CARRIED."
The request of the London Auto Sports Club to hold a Rally over
County roads was discussed. As it appeared that there were no requests for
any road closings, etc., no further action was taken.
The County Solicitor reported that he felt that a By-Law proposed
by All View Cable Service on County roads was not legal. The Engineer was
instructed to have the Solicitor meet with All View Cable to review the
problem.
THE ENGINEER REPORTED that some kind of a man lift would be required
for the assembly of the Kettle Creek culvert and that rental of a suitable device
would be in the order of $ 1500 per month for approximately 2 months.
THE ENGINEER WAS AUTHORIZED to obtain a suitable unit or a rental
purchase arrangement if possible with a purchase price in the $ 15,000 range
or less.
ST, T1:loW>S, 0l'iTARI0.
SE?'tEt:\BER 8, 1916.
PAGE 5.
"MOVED BY:
SECoNDED BY; ~. A. SCW>Yl!.R
't1lJ>.T 't1:ll!. ENGINEER IS AUT1:l0R1ZED TO WJ'E A??LICA'tloN YOR YLA-S1:lll'iG
S 0:1<.1 "..1.11::' C ,," CROSS1l'iG OY COUN't'l ROAD 52 BAS't OF
L1G1:l't SlGNAL '" ."", ." .j>.'
VfELL1NGTON ROAD.
s. J. GLOVER
CARB-1ED ."
R d 52 at Rettle Creel< and
AYTER D1Nl'iER the construction ~orl< on oa
1 the 'talbot sand and Gravel
Road 30 at salt creel< ~as inspected as ~el as
h' D lewood T~ailer ?arl<.
sand ?it and \.Zettle c~eel< conser"ation Aut or1.tY a
T1:ll!. ~Ey;rlNG ADJ~D yOR Dll'il'iER.
"MOVED BY:
L. R. CARROLL
SECONDED B'i; G. 'W. ~oN'tEl 'tl\.
't1lAT 'Wt. t>J)J~ 'to OC'tOBER 13 A't 10 ;00 ,A.t:\.
CARB-1ED ."
,-------
ST. T1:l0MAS \. ONTARIO.
AUGUST 12, 1976.
PAGE 1.
at 10:00 A.M., August 12, 1976. All lllembers except Reeve Wilson were present.
Tl:lB COUNTY OF ELGIN ROAD COMMITrEE }fET at the Municipal 1\uilding
Al SO Mr. Frank Clarke.
Tl:lB MINUTES OF JULY 14 were read and approved.
THE ENGINEER REPORTED ON THE WORK TO DATE AS FOLLOWS:
(1) GraSs cutting was continuing and the budget would be spent by the week
(2) s~rface treatment and priming wor\< was continuing with about 2 weeks
of AUgust 22 when work would be halted.
(3) work waS nearly completed in DUtton. A drain on Road 15 between Road
work left.
8 and Centre Street had been replaced as the old drain waS full of maple
tree rootS and undersized. SOllle clean up work on the Brown Drain Crossing
(4) the main stOrm drain in 1lellllont had been completed and catch basins and road
remained.
crossings were underway. curb and gutter work would start shortly.
(5) Excavation for the Salt Creek culvert waS continuing and it was hoped to
(6) The culvert on Road 52 on the Ba\<er-penhale Drain had been completed as
start asselllbly work in about 10 dayS.
well as the fill over it.
Clearing for the Kettle creek culvertS waS continuing as waS excavation of
lllUC\< and clay backfill work. It waS hoped to start work on the culvertS
(7) Kettle Greek conservation Authority had requested the county to start building
within 2 weekS.
call1ping roadS, but the ground had been tOO wet because of recent rainS.
Kettle Creek culvert and culvert mate'!:ial waS e~ected from ArmcO Canada by
(8) the Ministry of Transportation and Corot\lunicatiOns had approved planS for the
the mont.h's end.
ST. THOMAS, ONTARIO.
AUGUST 12, 1976.
PAGE 2.
WARDEN SCHAFER AND THE ENGINEER REPORTED on the meeting with Small
Craft Harbour Branch of the Environment Canada regarding dredging the Port
Burwell Harbour. A further meeting with the Branch and the fishermen would
be held shortly. Very little progress had been made as the Federal Government
was unwilling to make any cvul1uitments.
"MOVED BY: M. A. SCHAFER
SECONDED BY: S. J. GLOVER
THAT THE FOLLOWING PAYLISTS BE APPROVED FOR P~~ENT.
PAYLIST # 36 AMOUNTING TO $
PA):LIST #. 37 AMOUNTING TO $
PA):LIST # 38 AMOUNTING TO $
PAYLIST # 39 AMOUNTING TO $
PAYLIST # 40 AMOUNTING TO $
541.43
32,958.40
297.73
32,972.55
135,139.50
CARRIED."
CORRESPONDENCE WAS READ -
(1) From the City of Windsor regarding amendment s to Municipal Act '.
"MOVED BY: M. A. SCHAFER
SECONDED BY: L. R. CARROLL
THAT WE RECOMMEND TO COUNTY COUNCIL THAT THE RESOLUTION FROM THE
CI1Y OF WINDSOR RE AMENDMENTS TO THE MUNICIPAL ACT RE A VOTE OF
ELECTORS FOR ROAD EXPENDITURES BE FILED.
CARRIED."
(2) OMERS r€~garding change in calculating employee's pension.
(3) McKay, McKay & Vedova regarding zoning for North Shore Farming Co.
Gravel Pit.
(4) R. K. Mc.Neil regarding Mrs. Austin Smith and Robert Co'oremani.
(5) Riverside Construction Company regarding increase in asphalt prices.
(6) Kettle Creek Conservation Authority requesting that a landfill permit be
obtained for the fill on Road 52 and stating they were examining the need
for a pe~destrian underpass near the grade line on the east sidE~ of Kettle
Creek Valley.
ST. THOMAS, ONTARIO.
AUGUST 12, 1976.
PAGE 3.
(7) To~ship of Yarmouth regarding zoning By.LawS.
(B) Extendicare Ltd. regarding -revised drainage plans for their lot on Road
(9) Ministry of T-ransportation and communications Structu-ral Office ag-reeing
23 in port Stanley.
with committee's action in July 1976 -rega-rding the Middlemiss Bridge.
(10) county of Middlesex ag-reeing with committee1'S action in July 1976 regarding
(11) G. B-ro~ing, Head MuniCipal Roads, ~g-reeing to recommend to the Minister
the MiddlellliSS and Walker B-ridges.
that a cont-ribution f-rom St. .'rho11las Sanita-ry collection Services Ltd. could
be expended as a receipt in the const-ruction of the MiddleseX - Elgin County
Line if the county were to assume the road as a County road to the proposed
solid waste landfill site.
TRt. CMIRMAN AND ENGINEER REPORTED TMT AN OFFER had been made to Mi ss
PhylliS Ferguson for approximatelY 4.1 acres of land requi-red from 'her prope-rty
fo-r the diversion of Road 52 and that the offer had been based on a losS of -rentalS
of the remaining property as well as general damageS because of severance. The
offer including fence allowance totaled $ 12,B45. The committee agreed with the
offer althOUgh there waS some thought that the loSS in rentals would not be as
high as estimated.
by Elf-riede Atcheson to divide the lot she purchased from the county in Lot 7,
concession V, southwold. The Enginee-r waS instructed to write the Land Division
The committee discUssed an application to county Land Division committee
committee with a resume of the county'S action in establishing the 5 lots on the
present plan.
Dutton or for the other lot in Lot 7, concession V, southwold. He also stated that
he had received a -request from pe-rcy Robinson to buY approximatelY 1 3/4 ac-res in
The Engineer reported that no offers had been received for the lots in
Lot 20, concession X, cut off by county Road 52. The committee felt the prope-rty
could be sold, but should be tendered, all access should come f-rom the Township
Road, and that the opinion of the Yarmouth To~ship council obtained.
ST. THOMAS, ONTARIO.
AUGUST 12, 1976.
PAGE 4.
The Engineer also reported that Mr. Melvin Hyde on Francis Street
in Port Stanley wished to deed land to widen County Road 23 at no cost to the
County. The land was slope from the Joseph Street Hill and Mr. Hyde did not
wish to pay local improvement taxes on it. The CCJUlluittee agreed to accept the
land as long as no liability was incurred either through the hillside sliding
or trees falling.
It was noted that M. Mitchell would retire near the end of the month.
"MOVED BY: L. R. CARROLL
SECONDED BY: G. D. SIMPSON
Tlli\T WE ADJOURN TO SEPTEMBER 8, 1976 AT 10:00 A.M.
CARRIED" .
~,) 1 ~.o'
V~=~~;~ )
CHAIRMAN
ST. THOMAS, ONTARIO.
.JULY' 14, 1976.
PAGE 1.
~,
on July 14, 1976 at 10:00 A.M. All lllelllbers present except Reeve Wilson.
Mr. Frank Clarke, Ministry of TransportatiOn and communications waS also
THE cOUNTY OF ELGIN ROAD COMMITTEE MET at the MUnicipal Buildings
present.
THE MINUTES OF THE MEETINGS of June 9 and 24 were read and
1. The sale of Lot on Road 20 north of Shedden to HugO KeuSch had not been
THE ENGINEER REPORTED ON THE WORK TO DATE AS FOLLOWS 1
approved.
finalized and Mr. Reusch's deposit forfeited. The sale to Atcheson had
been finalized.
2. GraSs cutting waS underway.
3. sweeping waS continuing as required.
4. Hot Mix Asphalt patching with County Truck and Graders on roads to be
surface treated waS nearly cOtllPleted and surface treatlllent would start
5. work on Road 8 and 13 in DUtton waS nearly complete.
next week.
6. Cement bagging at the end of culvertS on the Brown Drain in DUtton waS
underway and the removal and replacelllent of culvertS, etc. would cost over
twice the Engineer's drainage estimate plus the cost of pipe to replace 140
feet of pipe that waS not worth putting back into north of Road 13.
7. Paving had been completed on Road 20 in port Stanley.
8. Pavement marking waS underway for Oxford county.
9. Asphalt curb and gutter work had been completed on the hills east of Calton
10. MaC McLawS waS again crushing gravel at the County pleasant Valley pit with
and on Road 16 at port Talbot.
the material appearing quite good. Higgs & Higgs oragline had been rented to dig
several test sections near the east boundary and good gravel had been found
there al so ·
ST. THOMAS, ONTARIO.
,JULY 14, 1976.
PAGE 2.
11. The prOpE!rty of the late Florence Bucke on Road 30 (approximately 21:2 acres)
had been purchased for $ 2100.
12. An Agreement based on County Land Purchase Policy had been reached for the
Williams property on the east side of Kettle Creek on Road 52.
13. Agreements had been reached with the Kettle Creek Conservation Authority
for the right of way, etc. needed for the Road 52 crossing of Kettle Creek.
14. Excavation work was underway for the culvert at Good:lngs on Road 52 and the
top soil being stripped on the diversion through land purchased from Williams.
15. Trinnning, top soiling and shouldering was proceeding on Road 30,.
CORRESPONDENCE WAS READ FROM John Wise, M.P. and Small Craft Harbours
Branch of Federal Government regarding dredging Port Bur1;vell stating that it was
not economical to dredge the harbour. It was decided to have an early meeting
with John Wise, M.P. regarding the matter.
THE ENGINEER REPORTED THAT approximately $ 3,800 had been spent by the
County on Mosquito Control with all inside mapping completed and oustide mapping
in the area of concentrated populated areas completed.
SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL and the proposed contract with the St. Thomas
Sanitary Collection Services Ltd. was discussed at some length. It was reported
that representatives from the Township of Southwold and the St. Thomas Sanitary
Collection SE~rvices Ltd. would meet with County Council on July 15 and that
representatives from the Ministry of the Environment would be present also.
THE MEETING ADJOURNED FOR DINNER.
AFTER DINNER
. . .
ST. THOMAS, ONTARIO.
,JULY 14, 1976.
PAGE 3.
t'MOVED BY: S. J. GLOVER
SECONDED BY: M. A. SCHAFER
THAT THE FOLLOWING PAYLISTS BE APPROVED FOR PAYMENT.
PAYLIST NUMBER 29 AMOUNTING TO $
PAYLIST NUMBER 30 AMOUNTING TO $
PAYLIST NUMBER 31 AMOUNTING ';{'O$
PAYLIST NUMBER 32 AMOUNTING TO $
PAYLIST NUMBER 33 AMOUNTING TO $
PAYLIST NUMBER 34," .AMOUNTING TO $
PAYLIST NUMBER 35 AMOUNTING TO $
33,996.68
610.42
25.00
32,816.62
2,203.42
34,286.65
227,807.85
CARRIED."
CORRESPONDENCE WAS READ AS FOLLOWS:
(i) Village of Port Stanley regarding rezoning for a Nursing Home on Road 23.
The Engineer reported that there were some problems with stO:L:m drainage.
(ii) Township of Southwold regarding rezoning for an estate lot on County
Road 20 in Lot 5, Concession I. Reeve Monteith reported that a number
of objections had been raised.
(iii) John Meyer, President of Clark Equipment regarding the County's purchase
of a loader other than one manufactured by his Company. The Engineer
read his reply which was endorsed by the CVl1uuittee.
(iv) Ministry of Transportation and CVl1u.uunications stating that a Dump Vehicle
Inspection Programme was being started September 1. The Engineer stated
that a licence to operate an inspection station was being applied for.
(v) Note was made of an article in the London Free Press stating that Dofasco
was expanding in Hamilton.
(vi) T. Watson regarding the poor condition of Road 38. The Engineer was
requested to reply.
"MOVED BY: L. R. CARROLL
SECONDED BY: G. W. MONTEITH
THAT WE ACCEPT THE QUOTATION OF RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY LIMITED
FOR PEA STONE AT $ 3.70 PER TON DELIVERED WHITE STATION AND $ 3.65 PER
TON DELIVERED IONA (MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION AND COMMUNICATIONS PATROL
YARD). SUBJECT TO MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION AND COMMUNICATIONS APPROVAL.
CARRIED.'f
ST. THOMAS, ONTARIO.
JULY 14, 1976.
PAGE 4.
THE ENGINEER REPORTED THAT only Armco Canada had made a submission
for Road 52 culverts over Kettle Creek.
"MOVED BY: M. A. SCHAFER
SECONDED BY: S. J. GLOVER
TlU~T WE ACCEPT THE QUOTATION OF ARMOC CANADA LTD. SUBJECT TO
MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION AND COMMUNICATIONS APPROVAL FOR MATERIALS,
SUPERVISION AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE KETTLE CREEK CROSSING
ON COUNTY ROAD 52 AS PER THE COUNTY'S REQUEST FOR QUOTATION AND ARMCO
CANADA QUOTATION NUMBER T-243 NAMELY $ 120,628 PLUS SHEET PILING AT
AN ESTIMATED COST OF $ 4,819.20 PLUS SUPERVISION OF BACKFILLING AT
$ 1.50 PER DAY.
CARRIED."
THE ENGINEER REPORTED THAT THE 2 LOTS on John Street in Dutton for
which no tenders had been received in June, had been placed in the hands of
M.L.S. listing through Beaudry Real Estate and the asking price was $ 6,000 for
the north lot and $ 7,000 for the south lot.
"MOVED BY: G. W. MONTEITH
SECONDED BY: L. R. CARROLL
THAT WE RECOMMEND TO COUNTY COUNCIL THAT A BY. LAW BE PASSED AUTHORIZING
THE WARDEN AND CLERK TO SIGN A DEED TO MRS. GLADYS GRAHAM FOR PART #7
REFERENCE PLAN llR.986 BEING PART OF LOT 20 REGISTERED PLAN #U3 DUTTON.
THE TRANSFER OF THE PROPERTY TO COMPLETE THE PURCHASE OF PART 1 REFERENCE
PLAN 11R.834 BY THE COUNTY FROM MRS. GRAHAM.
CARRIED."
"MOVED BY:
G. D. SIMPSON
SECONDED BY: M. A. SCHAFER
THAT WE RECOMMEND TO COUNTY COUNCIL THAT BY.LAW 2413 BEING A SALE OF
A PART OF LOT 7, CONCESSION V, SOUTHWOLD TO HUGO AND DONNA KEUSCH BE
RESCINDED.
CARRIED."
ST. THOMAS, ONTARIO.
JULY 14, 1976.
PAGE 5.
THE ENGINEER WAS INSTRUCTED TO PLACE the lot that Mr. Keusch
defaulted on into Real Estate hands with an asking price of $ 10,000.
THE ENGINEER REPORTED THAT at long last a Deed had been received
for the Whitney property and that an Agreement between the County and the
Whitneys for joint development of the Whitney property and the property the
County purchased in 1975 from the late Norman Higgs was ready to be signed.
"MOVED BY: G. W. MONTEITH
SECONDED BY: G. D. SIMPSON
THAT WE RECOMMEND TO COUNTY COUNCIL THAT A BY-LAW BE PASSED AUTHORIZING
THE WARDEN AND CLERK TO SIGN AN AGREEMENT WITH DONALD AND ROSE MARIE
WHITNEY FOR THE JOINT DEVELOPMENT OF THEIR PROPERTY IN LOT 24,
CONCESSION V, YARMOUTH AND ADJACENT COUNTY PROPERTY IN LOT 25,
CONCESSION V, YARMOUTH AS A SAND AND GRAVEL PIT UNDER THE PITS AND
QUARRIES CONTROL ACT 1971.
CARRIED."
THE ENGINEER REPORTED ON THE CONDITION OF Walker and Middlemiss Bridge
over the Thffines River at some length using the reports of R. C. Dunn & Associates
as a guide. He reported that officials of the Ministry of Transportation and
Communications were of the opinion that in view of the report of Davies Testing
Co. and their inspection that the concrete in the deck and piers of the Middlemiss
Bridge were of very poor quality and that 10 years was likely the maximum life of
both the piers and the deck and that some repairs would be required in the interval.
The Engineer stated that he was of the opinion that a major expenditure of funds
was not warranted and that minor patching only of the bridge should be done to
keep it in service as long as possible.
THE COMMITTEE WERE OF THE OPINION that no major maintenance shou~d be
spent on the bridge and that a new brfpge would be required in 8 to 10 years.
ST. THOMAS, ONTARIO.
JULY 14, 1976.
PAGE 6.
THE ENGINEER REPORTED THAT HE ALSO FELT that an additional major
expenditure on Walker Bridge was unwarranted as it appeared that in the order
of $ 125,000 to $ 150,000 would be required to improve the bridge to any degree
and that even this expenditure would not greatly improve the load carrying
capacity of the bridge.
COMMITTEE WERE OF THE OPINION that as little money as possible should
be spent on lNa1kers Bridge and that the question of replacement should be
discussed whlen it failed, in the light of other County priorities.
THE ENGINEER WAS INSTRUCTED TO REPORT the CVll11uittee's decisions
~~,
to the County of ~ and the Ministry of Transportation and CVll11uunications.
"MOVED BY: M. A. SCHAFER
SECONDED BY: S. J. GLOVER
THAT WE ADJOURN TO AUGUST 12 AT 10:00 A.M.
CARRIED."
(I) //fJ,"_//
-, ~ '"" '-
CHAIRMAN
',./'
COUNTY OF ELGIN ROAD cQMl>UTTEE
~
~
'PAGE 1
TO TRE ~ARDEN AND J:offil1BF.RS OF F.LGIN COUNTY COUNCIL:
1.
yQ\lR CQMl>UTTEE BEGS 'to REPORT AS FOLLOWS -
That the sale ot a portion 'Of Lot 7 concesSi'On V, south~old t'O RugO
and Donna Reuscb ~aS defaulted by Mr. Keusch and his do""- payment ~aS
kept by the CountY as damages sustained.
d ~ d t. 120 628 tor material and
That the quotatiOn 'Of ~co Cana a ut · a ~ '
supervision of erection for the Rettle Creek culvertS on Road 52 baS
been accepted.
. d ~.' ~s will supervise the
$ 5,000 ~ill be suppl~ed an ~co ~ng~nee.
~ ~e 2 culvertS are of
In addition sheet piling at an estimated cost of
2.
retaining ~ing ~alls. .....
. . __ ~.1 cree\< and excavation
lo~ered to allo~ e~cavation tor d~vers~on or ~-- p
for footingS.
trom the Creek Bed tor the footings and f'O~ the ea~th ~bankment. The
ditficultY of rellloval of thiS sott earth ~ll detertlline ~hen actual
From 12 to 15 feet of soft earth lllaY bave to be removed
erection ot the culvertS can start.
(1) That By-La~ 2413 being a By_La~ to sell a portion ot Lot 7, concession V,
south~old, to "ugO and Donna Keusch be rescinded.
~E REcoMMEND -
(2) That a By_La~ be passed authorizing the ~a~den and Clerk to sign a Deed
tor a portion of Lot 20 Registered plan 63 Dutton as sho""- on Reference
. ~iS ~ill complete a
plan l1R_986 as Part IfI to MrS. Gladys Granalll'
. . ...-rh'ch the Count" acquired sollle of MrS. Grahalll' s property
t~ansact~on ~n ~ ~ J
for the diversion of Road 8 in DUtt'On in 1975.
... continued ...
~\
\
COUNTY 01' ELGl1< ROAD CO~TTEE
~
~~
PAGE 2
(3)
That a By_LaW be passed authorizing the ~arden and Clerk to sign an
Agreement with Donald and Rose ~arie ~itneY for the joint developlllent
of tbeir property in Lot 24, concession V, Yarmouth and the adjaCent
C ....t....1 4'Y"1 Lot 25 conce ssiOn V, yarmouth as "a Sand and G'ravel
ountY prope. J ~,. '
pit under the pitS and Quarries control Act 1971. The Agreelllent will
alloW the sand and gravel to be excavated to the property ltne rather
than the 50 foot set back ordtnarilY required by the Act.
All Of ~ich IS RespectfullY Sublllitted.
----
C[\1\l~
ST. THOMAS, ONTARIO.
JUNE 24, 1976.
PAGE 1.
THE COUNTY OF ELGIN ROAD COMMITTEE MET on June 24 at 2:30 P.M. at
the County Buildings in conjunction with County Council. All members except
Reeve Nemett present. Also present, M. Hennessey, County Solicitor and
other members of County Council.
"MOVED BY: M. A. SCHAFER
SECONDED BY: G. D. SIMPSON
THAT LORNE CARROLL BE CHAIRMAN.
CARRIED."
A RESOLUTION FROM THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTHWOLD as attached was read.
THE RESOLUTION WAS DISCUSSED in some detail. M. Hennessey stated
that he knew of no reason that the County could not enter into an Agreement
with the St. Thomas Sanitary Gollection Services Ltd. to provide a price structure
that local Municipalities had the option of using.
VARIOUS MEMBERS OF COUNCIL expressed their opini.ons.
"MOVED BY: S. J. GLOVER
SECONDED BY: M. A. SCHAFER
THAT WE REGOMMEND TO COUNTY COUNCIL THAT THE RESOLUTION OF THE TOWNSHIP
OF SOUTHWOLD REGARDING ANY AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF ELGIN AND
THE ST. THOMAS SANITARY COLLECTION SERVICES LTD. BE FILED.
CARRIED."
"MOVED BY: G. W. MONTEITH
SECONDED BY: G. D. SIMPSON
THAT WE ADJOURN TO JULY 14 AT 10 :00 A.M.
CARRIED."
(j)IJt?J
CHAIRMAN
\
cotfNT'l OF ELGIN ROAD COMM:r:rrEE
::::::: ~
FIRST REI>ORT
~ ~
June 24, 1976
Session
..
TO THE TN ARDEN AND MEMBERS OF ELGIN COUNT{ coUNCIL:
We rec01J)1llend -
That the Resolution of the Township of southwold regarding
any Agreellle1\t between the county of Elgin and the St. Thontas Sanitary
Collection Services Ltd. be filed.
CHAIRMAN
"-?/'
/f
TOWNSHIP
1J1lA.l'o;J~
~0
SOUTHWOLD J--
I ,,;~'" .J
OF
F\NGAL - ONTAR\O
NOl 1 \<0
Phone 769-2010
r ,
THE KEYSTONE TOWNSH\P
June 23, 19'76.
county of :Fagin
H.L. Johnson, Clerk
9 Gla.dstone Ave
St. Thomas, Ontario
Dear Sir:
Re: Proposed Agreement Waste Disposal
County-St. Thomas Sanitary Collection
Service Ltd.
lrhe Township of Southwold Council passed the
enclosed certified resolution on June 22nd., 19T6,
regarding a proposed Agreement between the County of
Elgin and the St. Thomas Sanitary Collection Services Ltd.
r~
Kindly bring this to the at~jntion of County
Council at their next meeting.
Yours truly,
CO ,_ ~'.~ly. ~.;:)--------
\"z>,..~
RAP:mb
encl.
R.A. POW
Clerk Treasurer
.!
I!f'
l\tloved by
Seconded by
J\\
Longhurst
K. Monteith
June 22
_ Session 19 76
MUNICIPAL WORt.D I.IMITED, ST. THOMAS, ONT.
Form 425 A
No.,
206
That this Council question whether Elgin County Council has the Legal right to sign
any Agreement with St. Thomas Sanitary Collection Services. May we point out that at this
time there has been no hearing on the approval of this site and we strongly protest any
abrogation of the rights of the ratepayers to have a hearing. Also tnls Counci~is in
opposition of any rezoning of this property. If this Agreement is signed against this
Council's wishes, then W~~ have no alternative but to take the only action left open
to us.
\t;'
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
G.W. MONTEITH
IJ ~
~~~.>
~ ELGIN ROAD cm\M.'!,!t~ RJ!,po!E,
~
St. 'ThomaSl9 Onta-rio,
June 17 Session
19"76
TO TRJ!. \'IARDEN AND MEMBERS OF ELGIN cOUN't'l COUNCIL:
'lOUR ROAD COMMlTTEE REPORTS AS FOLLO\'lS:
1. \'Ia1111s1eY Bros. Ltd. have completed 3 portions ot their contract
tor ASphalt paving on Roads 42, 45 and Road 46 and have cOtllpleted
2. \'Ie have purchased a ChattfPion D_140 Grader frolll DOlllinion Road
Machinery Sales Co. Ltd. with the County 1959 AdalllS crader as a
part of 2 other portions.
t-rade-in.
All Of Vlhich Is RespectfullY SUblllitted.
---
CAAIR.MAN
'1':
'i'"
lO,
/II
J-vri 0 R A T:..f R Cr ~
THIS AGREEMENT 'made this
day of
, 1976.
~~
BET VI E E N:
ST. THOMAS SANITARY COLLECTION SERVICE
LIMITED, (hereinafter the "Owner"),
OF THE FIRST PART,
- and -
THE CORPORATION OF THE COUNTY OF ELGIN,
(hereinafter referred to as the "County")
for and on behalf of and for the benefit
of those LOCAL MUNICIPALITIES in: the
COUNTY OF ELGIN, more particularly de-
scribed Schedule "A" hereto, (hereinafter
referred to separately as a "Local l1unici-
pality" and together referred to as the
"Local Municipalities"), .
OF THE SECOND PART,
WHEREAS the Owner owns certain land in the Township of Southwold
in the County of Elgin hereinafter mentioned and described and is
desirous of using the same as a landfill type of waste disposal site;
AND WHEREAS the Owner has agreed to grant to the Local Munici-
palities, and to each of them, separately, the right to use the, said
waste disposal site during the useful life thereof on the terms and
conditions hereinafter set forth;
NOW THEREFORE THIS AGREEMENT HITNESSETH that in consideration of
$1.00 now paid to it by the County (receipt whereof is hereby acknoH-
ledged) the Owner covenants and agrees with the County for and on be-
half of and for the benefit of the Local Hunicipalities and each of
them, separately, as follows:
1. In this Agreement:
1.1 The "Additional Cost" in a calendar year shall mean the
actual cost to the Owner of:
(a) any necessary or expedient payment made to The
Corporation of the Township Southwold, whether
a lump sum, a royalty or pe~~odic payment or
otherwise,
(b) any necessary or expedient provision of waste
disposal service to The Corporation of the
Township of Southwold, or its residents, at
charges for each ton of Waste so disposed of less
then the Disposal Ra~e Per Ton at the time of
such service, and the actual cost to the Owner
of such service shall be deemed to be the
~:'~ :~'~("i
r
/1.
"'.
2
difference between the actual charge, if any,
for such service and the amount determined by
multiplying the Disposal Rate Per Ton in that
year, by the actual number of tons of Waste so
disposed of,
(c) any construction or maintenance of roads which
are not on the Site for which it is necessary
or expedient for the Owner to pay,
(d) any payment or expense or the doing of anything
which becomes necessary and which is not neces-
sary at the date hereof, and
(e) any payment or expense or the doing of anything
required after the date hereof for the protec-
tion of the environment on or in the vicinity of
the Site, including the control, collectiop and
treatment of leachate or gases and the monitor-
ing, sampling and testing of ground and: surface
water; save and except the cost of the instal-
lation of the leachate drains and cdllection
/
pond contemplated by the Owner's current design
for the Site, as shown on Schedule IIfF" hereto;
/I
and for the purposes of this definition of Additional Cost,
"necessary" means required by any Federal or Provincial
statute or regulation or by any municipal by-law or regu-
lation or by any government or regulatory body or agency in
connection with the establishment, use, maintenance and
operation of the Site, and "expedient" means, requested,
authorized or approved, in wri ting, by the Coun.ty; and.
further, where the Owner has incurred an actual cost in a
calendar year which ought to be amortized over a period
in excess of one year in accordance with generally accepted
t accounting principles, such cost shall be so amortized with
all necessary adjustments for interest actually paid by the
Owner in connection with ~he securing of the funds to pay
such cost, and reasonable administrative expenses in
connection therewith; and the Additional Cost for the year
in which such cost is incurred shall be accordingly adjusted
~"...~
- 3 -
1.2
and the Additional Cost for all subs-equent calendar years
shall be adjusted, as well, until such actual cost, interest,
if any, and expenses, if any, are fully amortized and paid;
The "Additional Ton Rate" in a calendar year shall be the
amount determined by dividing the Additional Cost :for that
year by the Total Annual Tonnage for that year;
The "Annual P~r Capi ta Charge" in a calendar year to be paid
by a Local Municipality under contract with the ~ner here-
under wherein such Local Municipality has agreed to pay for
the use of the Site an Annual Per Capita Charge, shall be the
amount determined by multiplying such Local Munici:pa1ity-s
Per Capita User Rate for that year by the population of that
Local Municipality for the 'inunediately preceding calendar
year as established by the last revised assess~ent roll of
such Local Municipality according to the records of the local
Regional Assessment Office of the Ministry of Treasury~
Econornics and Intergovernmental Affairs after deduc~ing from
!
such population the number of the residents of institutions
loca t(~d wi thin such Local Municipality, such as rtospi tals ?
provincial, municipal and private Homes for the Aged~ Col-
leges and schools to the extent that the residents of such
. '
. . .
institutions were included in the population of such Local
Municipality, provided that, in respect of the c~lendar years
in which the term of such contract cOuuuences or terminates,
the Annual Per Capita Charge to be paid by such LocalMunici~
pality under such contract in such calendar year shall be
calculated by multiplying the Annual Per Capita. Charge to
such Local Municipality (determined as if it were under con-
tract for that entire calendar year) by the number' of months
in that year during which such contract was in fO'I;~ce a.nd by
'f '
dividing the product so obtained by 12,
The HAnnual Per Cap;lta LJmit~' in a ca.1endar yea.r of a Local
Municipality under contract with,the 9wner hereunder wherein
such Local Municipality has' agreed to pay for the use of the
Site an Annual Per Capita Charge, shall be the nun~er of tons
determined by multiplying such Local Municipa1i.tyls P~r Ca,pita
UseX' Limi t for that year by the population of t:h~.t: Local
~
1.3
\;\~ 1.4
~.Ij>
t.r
~J
- 4 -
I':",
Municipality for the illl1uediately preceding calendar year as
established by the last revised' assessment roll of such Local
Municipality according to the records of the local Regional
Assessment Office of the Ministry of Treasury, Economics and
Intergovernmental Affairs after deducting from such population
the numbler of the residents of institutions located within
.
such Locl9.l Municipality, such as hospi tals, provin'cial, munici-
pal and private Homes for the Aged, Colleges and schools to the
extent that the residents of such institutions were included
in the population of such Local Municipality; providE~d that,
in respect of the calendar years in which the term of such
contract commences or teJ.U1inates, the Annual Per Cap:tta Limit
of such Local Municipality under such contract in such calendar
year shall be calculated by multiplying the Annual Per Capita
Limit of such Local Municipality (deteJ.lllined as if, i1: were under
contract for that entire calendar year) by the /wmber of months
in that year during which such contract was in force and by
dividing the product so obtained by 12;
,
1.5 The "Annual Per Ton Charge" in a calendar year to be paid by
a Local Municipality under contract with the Owner hereunder
~
wherein such Local Municipality has agreed to' pay for the use
of the Site an Annual Per Ton Charge, shall be the amount deter-
mined by multiplying the Disposal Rate Per Ton for that year
by the number of tons of such Local Municipality's Municipal
Wast~ brought to the Site for disposal in that yearby employees
of such Local Municipality or by any person under contract with
such Local Municipality for the haulage of such Municipal Waste
or by the employees of any such haulage contractor;
1.6 "Act" means The Environmental Protection Act, 1971, as amended,
and all regulations thereunder, as amended;
1.7 The "Base Operational Ton Rate" in a calendar year shall be
determined in accordance with Schedule "B" by reference to the
Total Annual Tonnage in that yea~, and shall be the amount in
column 2 of Schedule "B" set ~pposite the appropriate Total
Annual Tonnage range in co1unm 1 of Scbedu1e "B";
1.8 The "Disposal Rate Per Ton" in a calendar year shall be the
I.
V;'ff" · 1 t.,
1.9
1.10
1.11
1.12
1.13
1.14
- 5 -
the amount which is the aggregate of the following amounts:
(a) the Operational Ton Rate for that yeai,
(b) the Ownership Ton Rate for that year, and
(c) the Additional Ton 'Rate for that year;
"Effective Date" means the day upon which this Agreement
comes into force and effect as provided in paragraph 19
hereof;
"Garbage" means the following types of abandoned or dis-
garded Waste generated, produced or created by a House-
holde.r.:
All animal and, vegetable waste material from the pre-
paration of food, cans, sweepings, paper, cardboard,
wearing apparel, ashes, bottles, glass, discarded.
household utensils, lawn and hedge cuttings, leaves,
twigs, shrubs, brush and tree limbs;
"Hazardous Substance" means a substance which, because of
i~s physica~ or chemical nature or because of the form in
which it exists may explode or become ignited easily or
cause intense flames or which constitutes a health hazard
to the Owner's servants, agents or employees by reason of
their handling the same;
"Householder" means the occupant of residential premises,
whetl1er the owner, lessee, tenant or otherwise;
The "Life of the Si teU means the period cOUllllencing on the
Effective Date of this Agreement and ending upon the date
when the Owner may no longer dispose of l.Jaste in the 'Haste
Disposal Area as provided in paragraph 19 hereof;
The l"Municipal "laste" of a municipality shall mean the
following types of Waste, generated, produced or created
within the territorial lim~ts of such municipality:
(a) Garb~ge from Householder,
(b) Waste from institutions such as hospitals,
Homes 'for the Aged, Colleges and schools, and
(c) an amount of cOuwJercial waste not in excess of
the amount so generatedi produced or created
and disposed of by suc~ municipality in the
calendar year of 1976,
'.,...
- 6 -
1.15 The "Operational Ton Rate" for each ensuing cal~ndar year
shall be calculated by multiplying the Base Operational Ton
Rate for that year by a factor determined by dividing the
Consumer Price Index for December of the iuuuediately preceding
year by the Consumer Price Index for December of 1975;
1.16 The "Ownership Ton Rate" in a calendar year shall be deter-
mined in accordance with Schedule "B" by reference to the
Total Annual Tonnage in that year and shall be the amount in
Column. 3 of Schedule "B" set opposite the appropriate Total
Annual Tonnage range in column 1 of Schedule "B";
1.17 The "Per Capita User Rate"" in a calendar year shall be an,
amount dete.L1Uined by multiplying the Disposal Rate Per Ton
for that year by O~365j
1.18 The "Per Capi ta User Limi t" in a calendar year shall be
0.4 tons;
1.19 "Site"! means those lands, including structures thereon,
(I ,
shown in Schedule "'c" heretol and as more particularly de....
scribed in Schedule "D" hereto;
1.20 The "Total Annual Tonnage" of the Site in any calendar year
shall be calculated by deducting from the aggregate of the
{ ,
actual number of tons of<~ast~\ from any source brought to
the Site in that calendar year for disposal~ including such
Waste as is to be processed, recycled or reclaimed, the
aggregate of the actual number of tons of:
(a) earthfill material entering the Site in that
calendar year for the purpose of coyer material
or top soil,
(b) material, such as earthfill, granular material,
foundry sand, broken tile, etc~, entering the
Site in that calendar year for the purpose of
building and maintaining roads, and
(c) material which, having been processed, recycled
or reclaimed and sold, is transported from the
Site in that cal~ndar yeari
provided t~at in respect of the broken calendar years at the
beginning and at the end of the Life of the Site, the Total
Annual Tonnage shall be calculated by multiplying the Total
Annual Tonnage for such broken calendar year, detE~.Lwined as
1.1J ,
l
1.21
.. 7 ..
'-- f mo!\tnS du-ri!\g sucn b-rO~e!\
afo-resaid. bY tne !\Umve-r 0 '
~ne!\ tne ~aste DiSyosal h-rea ~aS actuallY
Waste a!\d by di~idi!\g tne
calenda-r year.
i!\ use fo-r tne diSyosalOf
y-roduct 50 obtai!\ed bY 12;
"\'laste" mea!\S Ga1'bage 01' -refuse
o-r conl1!\e-rcial ~aste of a!\Y ~i!\d i1"l""
!\d e1tceyt tne to.Ll-~"
tne mea!\i!\g of tne Act. sa~e a
. b'nl" combustible mate-rial of a!\Y
(a) e1ty10S~~e o-r ~g ,
o-r domestic. i!\dust-rial
_.~....udi!\g ~aste ~itni!\
natut:e,
(b)
(c)
(d)
cat: bodies,
sneet i-rO!\ a!\d sc-ray metal.
. '. d. ...oetet: ot: ea tet:'
d t-rees naV'~!\g a ' ~a," "
t-ree stu1llYs a!\
, n -reate-r tna!\ 4 feet.
tna!\ 10 i!\Cnes a!\d a le!\gt g
.~~e 01' t01tic mate-rial.
anY cot:t:os 1.. '" .
a!\Y ca-rcasses of a!\imals.
(e)
(f)
(g)
(b)
1.2'2
li,\uid \'JaS te,
a!\Y Uaza-rdOUS Substa!\ce.
!\d ~i!\d as is !\O~ o-r may
(i) ~aste of a!\Y !\atu-re a ·
" time be y-ronibited fo-r d~s-
ne-rei!\afte-r at a!\,
f ~ statute ot:'
1 t tbe site bY -reaso!\ 0 a!\,
posa a
. 0\'J ot:'
, . ,f tne ?-ro~i!\Ce of O!\ta-r~o !\
-regulat~O!\ 0 ' ·
1 ted o-r ame!\ded;
ne-reafte-r e!\acted, y1'Omu ga '
, d · tbi!\ tne Site uyo!\'
.' earlS tne la!\ ~~
"\'laste DiSyosal h-rea 11\ · tn
ited i!\ acco-rda!\Ce ~~
. '!\ ~nicn \'las te 1I\aY be deYos
~!\tO o-r ~ -roV'al iSSued to tne
. 'o!\al ce-rtificate of hyP
tne ?-ro~~s~ t at tne
f tne site pu-rsua!\t to tne hC ·
~e-r i!\ -resyect 0 ' d outli!\ed i!\ -red' o!\
f ....,b; en la!\d is sno'\NL\ a!\
""_ et: eO , V'I .....
2.
a co~t1'act fo1' tne use of tne
a!\Y a!\d eV'e-rY Local
Life of tne site a!\d
3.
, ~
, :
4.
~ ontiOn shall do SO
. . C1 sucu r
. . alitY e~e~c~s~np ·
~ Local ~un~c~Y cont'ract ~n
eaCH . the owne~ a
. and delive~~ng to .' t:iate~
by e')tecut~ng 1 "B" he~eto. appt:op
of scbedu e
t. an"" the fo-rtll
subS tan 1- J
'f""ing the~ein:
1 dated. spec~J ,d
Y f the cont~act, an ·
la) the te~tIl 0 1 }\unicipal~tY
, .. b term t'he Loca '
au-r~Ug sue .
(b) '\tIhether. · ta Cha~ge or an
, J>,.nnual l'e~ cap'l.
'Will yaJ an
't n Cba-rge,
J>,.nnual l'e~ 0 . d b"" an enabling bY-
~ ^"'Q. accomk>an~e J
. tIln leteU an 1.
and otber'ltl'l.se CO 't' · f' d b"" tbe cle~'"
1. ...r ce-rt~ ~e J
1 }\unicipa 'l.tJ . ' h
laW of sucb Loca ' · nd delive~Y of sUC
. he e~ecut'l.on a
1 authO~iz~ng t binding
unae~ sea . f b"" the 01Nt\er. a '
" ~eceipt the~eo J
cont~act; and upon ' between the owner and
intO e~istence d
cont~act shall come '\tIith the te~ms an
. in acco~aance
b' Local }\Unicipal'l.tY d d thiS J>,.g~eement.
t e aelive~e an
f he cont~act SO
conditions 0 t tS as afo~esaid.
.~. a in cont~ac' '
b snec~~'l.e ftet:
'the te~m to e ... h n tWO monthS a
ence not leSS t a
(a) shall cotlltll f to the ownet:.
, the delivet:Y the~eo
the date of .' f a month and
t the beg'l.nn'l.ng 0
, ) shall cotlltllence a
(b ^"'d of a month,
a at tbe ev
shall en ' t:S whet:e the
e "leSs than five yea, .
(c) shall not b . the contt:act haa
. . alitY delivet:'l.ng
Local }\un~c~p · ~ het:eunder
. a. tS ok>t~O~~
. usl"" e~e~C'l.se 'l.
not p-re"~o J
a 0 and
to 0 s,. than tht:ee yeat:s.
. shall not be leSS
I d) other'ltl'l.se, d shall not
, . herein grante
and the opt'l.ons but
'thiS M;reement · e Bffective Date.
01Nt\e~ unt~l th
be binding upon the d delivet: a cont~act
. e~ecute an
"" Local }\unicipa1~tY may ""time befot:e the
anJ ' 3 he~eof at anJ
d. na-rag-rayb ' Q. 'have
_~nvide ~n t' 11 be deetlle to
.. ~v"\r-ract sba
__A suc..~ h
I'"__i> t e
rooutno ....-
_ 8 -
5.
\
Bffective Date. ' · 1 Local }\,~niCipalitieS
nd all contractS w~th
'thiS J>,.greement. a 1 be binding upon the
to thiS J>,.greement shal ·
made pU~ suan t ' '. · and as '\tie 11, ~ f the
~ .fe of tbe 51-te,
a · ng the '-'~ ' · f
owner onlY ut:~ eat: du~ing the L~ e
. anY calenda~ Y
!otal J>,.nnual !onnage 'l.n
6.
'4
1:
1 ·
. 1 S tnan 30,UUv
" " d 8S 000 tonS 0': 1.S eS ,
of tne site e)lCee S , " t s 'Wi tn 'Local
, d all contrac
n' Agreement an
tOnS, tnen t 1.S ~,' .oreement snall
t to tu1-S nt.)
.' made pursuan
dunicinal1.t1.es ' ' ,,'~d shall not
~1 r. 1 d ~ ~ea~ . 3~~
d of sucn ca en a J
terminate at tne en
b' ding upon tne owner.
tnereafte,: be, 1.n, ' ,.' unde': contract
1 ocal 1'\uniC1-pal1-tY 1-S
t tne case tnat a ~ after tne end
n 1 ner Ton cnarge, '
an I\n:o\.18. J:
to paY to tne owner contract and in respect
. tne term of sucn
f eacn 1I\0ntn dur1-ng , n 1.ocal 1'\unici-
o ~ 11 render to sUc
b Ov:rne-r sua
of tnat 1I\0nth, t e t~e nU1l\ber of tonS
. ' . t eflua1 to .Ll
. fo': an a1l\0un '1.
lit" an in'J01-ce broUgnt to tne
pa J' . , d..nici....al vlaste
. 'pal1-tY s ,",v " '
of such 1.ocal 1'\un1-C1- n 1.ocal 1'\unicipalitY s
1 in sucn 1I\0n tn by s UC · ·
Site for disposa ,n 1.ocal 1'\un1-C1--
ontract '11'11-tn sUc
rson unde': c nloY-
employees, a pe · · 1 VIas te or tne em"
1 ,of sucn Mun1-C1-pa
palitY for tne nau age . lied bY an estimate
t.....actO~ mul t1..:P
n lage con ~ ' ' ' b
eeS of sucn a aU lendar year in 'II'In1-C
te l'er Ton for tne ca '
of tne DispOsal Ra . a be rendered by
t~l" in'J01-ces 11\ y
11 sucb 1I\0n "J
ucb 1I\0ntn fa s. " · ....alitJ sball paY
s ~ Local Mun1-C1-"
. il and sUC" '
prepaid ord1-nary 1I\a . be 1I\0ntblY in'J01-ce,
amount set fortb 1-n t ·
to tne O\Nf\er tbe ' 10tn day follo'll'l1-ng
'd on or before tbe
rendered as aforesa1- ' . At tne end of eacn
.' of tbe in'J01-ce.
tne date of ma1-ling to sucn ~ocal
1 l'er Ton Cbarge
tbe ]>,rlnua lpe-r
calendar yea':, d ter1l\ined and al pro
. f tbat year sball be e er
Municipal1-tY or tS bet'll'leen tbe O\Nf\
d · tbe accoun
11 be 1I\a e 1- n d '
adjUst1l\entS sba lendar year; an 1-n
, . alitY for tbat ca '
d Sucb 1.ocal 1'\un1-C1-P ....tbl-" naylllentS
an ,,~t of tbe 11\0<<, . J "
, egate a1l\0v"
nt tbat tbe aggr rl" payable.
tbe e~e d tbe amount prope 'J
d "ear e)lCee s' ·
f r sucb calen ar J b 1.ocal Mun1-C1--
o d.cce-reuee to sue
b te tbe 1-'-'- "
~ O.~er sball re a f the fol10'li'11-ng
t"e v'" da of 'February 0
or before tne 10tb Y b rate of 1% per
ter in default,at t e
interest tbereaf ' ~ .'e~,t tbat tbe
d . n tlLe e v LL
if de1l\anded; an 1-
paylllentS fo': sucb calenda,:
ble sucb Local
1:0pe-rlY paya '
tban tbe a1l\0unt P, e': on 0': befo,:e
d' fference to tbe ()'Ii'1U ,
sbal1 pay tbe" 1-
'f' tbe fol10'li'1ing yea':,
f e b-rua1:1 0 .
_ 9 -
palitJ oU
yea-r 'Witb
1I\0ntb or pa,:t tbereof.
aggregate amount of tbe 1I\0ntblY
yea': is leSS
l1unicipality
tbe 10tb day of
~ 11 ~
- 10 -
9.
In the case that. a Local l1unicipality is under contrac't to
pay to the Owner an Annual Per Capita Charge, after the end
of each month during the term of such contract, and in re-
spect of that month, the OWner shall render to such Local
Municipality an invoice for an amount equal to one .twelveth
of the estimated Annual Per Capita Charge for the calendar
year in which such month falls. Such monthly invoices may
be rendered by prepaid ordinary post and such Local Munici-
pality shall pay to the Owner the amount set forth in the
monthly invoice, rendered as aforesaid,on or before the 10th
day following the date of mailing of the invoice. At the
end of each calendar year, the Annual Per Capita Charge to
such Local Municipality for that calendar year shall be deter-
mined and all proper adjustments shall be made in the accounts
b~tween the Owner and such Local Municipality for that
calendar ye.ar and in the event that the aggregate amount of
the monthly payment for. such calendar year exceed the amount
properly payable, 'the Owner shall rebate the differenc.e to
such Local Municipality on or before the 10th day of February
of the following year with interest thereafter, in default, of
1% per month or part thereof, if demanqed; and in the ~vent
that the aggregate amount of the monthly payments for such
calendar year is less than the amount properly payable, such
Local Municipality shall pay the difference to
before the 10th day of February of the following year ./)~.....
The Owner shall dispose of, at the Site, all Municipal Waste
of any Local Municipality under contract with the Owner here~
under and brought to the Site for dispo~al by any such Local
Municipality's employees 1 any person under contract with any
such LocalMuni~ipality for the haulage ot such Municip~l W~ste
or the employees of any such haulage contractori provided that
the Owner shall not be required to accept Waste for. disposal at
the Site brought there;
(a) by any person who fai,ls to ~bideby the reasonable
instruct~ons of the Owner or its.employees, whether
posted up or verbal, as to the manner in which
8.
- 11 -
such person is to conduct himself or operate any
vehicle over which he has control while at the
Site,
(b) any person who fails to proceed to and from the
Site along such road as may be determining pur-
suant to the Act, and
(c) unless it is transported to the Site in a garbage
truck mounted on an adequate chassis with a fully
enclosed body equipped with machinery capable of
unloading itself, or in a tarpaulin covered
truck so equipped;
and provided that, in the case that a Local Municipality is
under contract to pay to the Owner an Annual Per Capita
Charge, .the Owner shall not be required to accept: for dis-
posal at the Site in any calendar year, pursuant to such
contract, any amount of such Local Municipality's Municipal
Wast~~ in excess of such Local Municipality's Annual Per
10.
Capita Limit for that year.
The Owner shall dispose of, at the Site:
(a) at its then prevailing cOli~ercial disposal rates
as posted up at the Site, cOullllercial waste in
. .
excess of the limits prescribed in clause (c)
of subclause 1!14 of Section 1 of this Agreement,
and,
(b) in the case of a Local Municipality un.der con-
tract hereunder to pay the Owner an Annual Per
Capita Charge, at said commercial rates, but not
exceeding by 10% the then current Disposal Rate
Per Ton, Municipal Waste in excess of the limits
prescribed in Section 9 of this Agreement,
generated, produced or created within the territorial
limits of any Local Municipality under contract with the
Owner hereunder and brought to the Site for disposal by
11.
any such Local Municipality's ~mployees, any person under
contract with such Local Municipality for the haulage of
such Waste or the employees of any such haulage contractor.
Subject to causes beyond its control, the Owner shall, as a
",
~
. ~
... 12 -
minimum, keep the Site open for the receiving of Waste for
disposal between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday, in each week, provided however, the Site
may, in the d:Escretionof the Owner, be closed on statutory
holidays..
12.
The Owner shall cause a weigh ticket to be issued for
every load of Haste entering the Site. Such weigh tieket
shall show the date, name of the hauler, the origin of
the load, the person on whose behalf it is brought to the
Site and the net weight of the load measured by weighing
the vehicle both in and out of the Site; provided that
in the case of a load of the Municipal Waste of a Local
Munieipality under eontract with the Owner hereunder, for
all purposes of this Agreement, the net weight of such a
load shall be deemed to be the greater of the actual net
weight thereof or one ton. Duplicate copies of all such
issued weigh tickets shall be retained by the O\VI1er and
the Owner shall summarize the said weigh tickets and shall
forvJ'ard such summaries on a monthl!y basis to each Local
Municipality under contract with the Owner pursuant to
13.
this Agreement.
u '
The Owner shall make and keep detailed records and sup-
porting vouchers relating to the calculation of Additional
Cost and the weigh tickets issued at the Site. All such
records, vouchers and weigh tickets shall be open to
the inspection and audit of any Local l'1unicipality under
contract with the Owner hereunder or such Local Munici-
pality's authoriz,ed nominee at any time during regular
business hours at the Site throughout the te.LLU of such
contract with the Ovmer and for one year subsequent to
the expiration of the term of such contract and the County
may at any time during the Life of the Site conduct such an
inspection and audit and oversee the weighing of vehicles
in and out of the Site. "
14.
Save with respect to the computation of an Annual Per Ton
Cha.rge or an Annual Per Capita Charge, which Charges shall
"
- 13 -
he calculated and rounded to the nearest cent, all other
calculation required or permittted by this Agreement shall
be made to the sixth decimal and shall be rounded to the
fifth decimal.
15.
In the event that a Local Municipality at any time during
the teJ.U1 of a contract with the Owner hereunder contracts
16.
with a person for the haulage of its Municipal Waste to 'the
Site on behalf of the Local Municipality, the Local Munici-
pality shall take all such steps as are reasonably available
to it from time to time to ensure that such haulage contrac-
tor and his employees shall accurately account to the Local
Municipality and the Owner for such Waste so hauled to
the Site as distinct from Waste hauled to the Site by the
same haulage contractor on behalf of others.
The Owner shall be entitled to rely upon the accuracy of
.representations made to its weigh scale operator as to
the origin and type of Waste brought to the Site and as
17.
to the person on whose behalf such Waste is brought to
the Site, made by any person who is an employee of a
Local Municipality under contract with the Owner hereunder
or who is a person under contract with such a Local
Municipality for the haulage of its Municipal Waste or who is
the employee of such haulage contractor.
Inasmuch as the Owner is not at the date hereof authoriz-
ed by the Act to permit the use of the Site for the dis-
18.
posal of Waste created, produced or generated within the
territorial limits of some of the Local Municipcllities,
it is a condition precedent to the use of the Site by
such Local Municipalities and to the execution and deliv-
ery by suc~ a Local Municipality of a contract hereunder
that the O~er first obtain such necessary authorizations;
and until such necessary authorizations are obtained, the
. Owner shall be under no obligation hereunder to such
Loca.l Municipalties, except t.~at the Owner agrees to use
its best efforts to obtain such n.ecessary authorizations.
Nothing herein shall limit the Owner" s right to enter
into agreements with other parties with respect to the
.,
(
'.
- 14 ..
disposal of Waste, whether or not such Waste is geperated,
produced or created within the territorial limits of any
of the Local Municipalities and, whether or not: such
Waste is the subject of this Agreement; nor shall any-
thi.ng "herein limit the Owner's right to enter into agree-
ments with respect to the provision of additional services,
in connection with the disposal of Waste pursuant to- this
Agreement or contracts entered into with Local Municipal-
ties hereunder.
19.
This Agreement shall only become effective and binding
upon t~e Owner when the Owner is in a position to deposit
Waste in the Waste Disposal Area without being in contra-
vention of any Federal or Provincial statute or regulation,
any municipal Dy-Iaw or regulation, or any law, order,
injunction or restraint whatsoever imposed by any Court
of competent jurisdiction or by any government or regu-
latory body or agency; and the day upon which the Owner
is in such a position shall be the Effective Date of
this Agreement and the Life of the Site shall terminate
when the deposit of Waste in the Waste Disposal Area
becomes a contravention as aforesaid.
20.
Any notice or communication to the Owner' shail be deemed
to be well and sufficiently given or served if handed
to any officer of the Owner or if mailed to the Owner
by prepaid registered post addressed to it at R. R. #5,
St:. Thomas, Ontario or such other address as the Owner
may designate, by written notice, and, if mailed, notice
shall be deemed to have been given and service shall be
deemed to have been effected on the fourth business day
21.
after mailing.
The County may, at the request of any Local Municipality,
take such action and do such things as may be necess",ary or
desirable to enforce this "Agreement for and on behalf of
such Local MunicipalitY or ',all of the Local Municipalities,
,
but the County is under no obligation whatsoever so to do.
22.
In the event that the County acquires or assmnes direct
responsiblity, either by legislation or agreement, for the
p~ovision of facilities fo~ the disposal of the Municipal
'~aste gene~ated, p~oduced o~ c~eated ~ithin the te~~ito~ial
limits of any of the Local Municipalities. the County shall
be entitled to all ~ights. benefits and options contained in
this Ag~eCment in the place and stead of any such Local
Municipality; and if, at the time of such acquisition o~
assumption of ~csponsibility! any such Local}1unicipality is
under cont~act ~ith the ownc~ he~eunder, the County shall
assume all of such Local Munici1?alityls obligations to the
.. 15 ...
owne~ pursuant to such contract,
This Ag~ccment shall ensu~e to the benefit of the Local
Municipalities and each of them, separatelY, and their
(
respective successors and shall enure to the benefit
of and shall be binding upon the owner, itS'Successors
in title to the site and it shall run ~ith the land.
23.
IN'~ITNESS ~HEREOF St. Tho~as Sanitary Collection service
Limited and The corpo~ation of the CountY of Elgin have hereuntO set
their corpo~ate seals over the hands of their respective 1?ro1?e~
office~s duly authO~ized in that behalf.
ST. THOMAS SANITARY COLLECTION
SERVICE LIMITED
per:
----
president
THE CORPORATION OF THE COUNTY OF ELGIN
Per:
---- ------
VIarden
Pel: ~
-_....--~.
Clerk
The execution and delivery of
this Agreement has been
authOrized by the county's
~.._ , AW No. pas sed the
_ , 1976.
SCHEDULE "A."
~
The corporation of the Town of l\ylme1:
The corporation of the Village of Belmont
The corporation of the Village of Dutton
The corporation of the Village of port BU-rwell
The corporation of the Village of port Stanley
The Corporation of the Village of Rodney
The corporation of the Village of springfield
The corporation of the Village of Vienna
The Corporation of the Village of ~est Lorne
The corporation of the TownshiP of l\ldborough
The corporation of the TownshiP of Bayham
The corporation of the TownshiP of South Dorchester
The corporation of the TownshiP of Dun~ich
The corporation of the TownshiP of Malahide
The corporation of the TownshiP of "ia'[1l\OUth
"'!1' '."..
SCHEDULE "B"
(1)
Total Annual Tonnage
(In thousands of tons)
(2)
Base Operational
Ton Rate
(3)
Ownership
Ton Ra.te
30 to 35 $ 6.06 $ 2.28
from 35 to 40 5.47 1.97
from l+O to 45 5.01 1.74.
from l+5 to 50 4.63 1.56
from 50 to 55 4.31 1.41
from 55 to 60 4.07 1.29
from 60 to 65 3.86 1.18
from 65 to 70 3.68 1.10
from 70 to 75 3.52 1.02
from 75 to 80 3.38 0.95
from 80 to 85 3.25 0.90
=
u
~
~
:::>
Q
~
::r:
u
CI)
s
;-
" .
k,_= - ~___! ,,.,....-.- ~w~ ~ no. ~.. ~_______ ,~~ .
r=~----~~ ~~~' \~"~~~;~~~/;/]~~,~~~I~,10~~(~~~~k~" '
"\ :!\ '\ /A'~'-'''~'''::;~'_:- ~.~ ~':;.D ~\~:::::;:t(;'l::.~ "~- ~
i ~ \ '" /)~"'NC.~ ,_' T" T".'.t;~A_ '~_, T.....C~~ 1/ L~~ ~ VJ~, '- l~
~ \ -if~~ci7~~~~~~i~~> j~~~:-'''f ~~~;:-e-7'" '" ~-'" \, ~
/ };f,;."iiii"~t~'-7\~-1 ' U ~ -::;:; ~ ""'\ ---'\ \ \! '''''~
.i I . ~ ~ Cl~ ~ 'i, il r- ~y ~ /~~ ,ro. :I n t ~ ~ l ~ .
I ((f7-~-':"::~:::~1:loT\'2.'\ M.,A(-I~','( .(:~,~' 23]1[1 II '
, i I': co,.~ /"1.;1~~ \ \, \\\'?J.Q.\~ \
'-'f' / ! : <V ~ ~ i \ ~.". " ,
. i~ ..,.iJ ct. ~ <
~. b"" /:11 ',. ~~ ( - bm ~ \ \ U\
\\ \
-=-813 ".,,",,-~ 11;, ~J.v,<J1t~,-~/..--,,",\ ~.t~~:'>_~i \ \
---------,--------~-------_\.,.-\ -=-~-~~::.:-'~~:';;:~::'_="':~,--~,-~~.,~,_., -=-, -. ----, ~~ ~~- ~~~~,~~~-~.:_, -,~. - \
. ~ ......~, . ~,~----c"V'W"'40:~
\---- u____________.._"''=________.:.-='~==_-::~~'~'_~.__---" _,--:-
-~,.- r'-~' ",
-~--\..,'-- -.
..
;!
'ot.J .
lII:
LOT
21
C.OIo.J .
:m:
'~-
". "'J
r~
~A
I:. U~ H
j
1
J40TE:So. ON ~A.C;.,",-. DIiiL.....,~
. ~.. DIZ~. M. "7 ~0Cl. F"1toUt.L. c.c...TOUQ.$
t C""'tT'Y OP oPeo.N OiTGH FIil.OM. -~"'fO'" 'C: .'C: To 506C.TIOW.....-.;
r$ I~, C.,F So. I ....~D OW rt . .o~ .. ..,..,tMl,Jlil ~E:<:.Tt<:IW 'c..o .'C:
!;. ~I'T'( ~ OPEo....O\T'-" I='IiZolOrM. ~C.TtioIoJ "(7:.'0. To ~T~ Co'C'
1'$ ~ c p~.. bA.~ Qt.,l.,. .o~ t".l.,UMUM. '$&.CTIOW 'O'--g'
4. -'5 UQTa...o CN '$6.CTlo.... '/Ii. .'A ,..~ ~~~ ~u.. W. U"!5of::C
To Cl'IV'UET '5I.JCs:.r.ce:. W'Ti;.2. ~....."( F~>>. "1..1.. ~ ~~"5.
s....wy 'SU!it';A.C:E:. wa.'Tt:.2. TH~T ~S c.wT&.Q. .. T~~ ~ L&.
P\..IM.~ .ou.T .. ~E.O To .. ~TlOW <:.oNT~
flI't..A""'Fo&~.L...
NOTE.5'
L T&.~T ~i.!J '.2..~ WIl.L & lJ~&.D ptc. ~'W.QU5....T
Ga:>uNO""T&a.. A.~L.Y~~~
I. PONe '...- TOe.e u'5E.O fOIif.. F"IRE. "~"TU.fW A.f na,.T "ND
THE.N Ft~lE.O 'N P'R lOR 11::) v~ A'!t .0\. ~fIlO~ ARCA.
~ WLu.. "oQ >>4OU'b6. l~ 10' ~T... AWe ~ "'-T OF~.
'" W1DIl.O ~1'tV'1C-'" ~ w::uw. .. UN~QA.CllOUND FR.O'w\
R,oa. QoHI.....
!l HVOQ:O ';E.RVtC.E. oe.. R~" \C;. O~ .....ooOt.N pC)LIi."
ON 'THe. ~T" ~DL 0* TH~ QOA.C
6 Af'tUl. r~ FtltST 12. ~c. COY..P..:i.~ TWl. 1lL^M'frrtOUI.
OF Tl-E. .~JrE. ~ e.,E DE,......E.l.OPW;) ~....c. .
~H....Q PROuQE.~=\O""'.
LEGEt-JD:
C) __ . _l> o&QEA
.--- --e.xI6T....- ~ OITC.....
-.-t lE.ttt~. 'h.....~O go~.)o
~""""-
c:=J .ll.T1............ '- ateOtt
(=:J 6.JU:;'Tl"O ..cuw.~
~ ~x.i:"T1toa(j, ~"'",..__6
. l""toT. f1CIL....
.-.-.~5.WC& ~~(~~T)
..-.;...--.P'.1o.lC.1. u...&.~(PW)PI:>66D)
/1./ .//. e.....^'.
PIlW~O Pa....TE, ~
.. ~ -. . ~u..U) P8.tVATe. It.~
""~w oPI:", QtTc;....
\, 1'~~.OPboon"". u:>CATo..CF 12t{>/14 I ~..~
" 'Kc.~ a;:"To 0--(7 e:WGT~~
, _! IUv'6100. ! .-n I ~..._
o
~
~
Ii ~
II~
Ii
II i
I"
I
SITE 8 AREA PlANS
SOIL TEST REPORT
ST. THOMAS SANITARY
COLLECTICtII SE:RVICE LTD.
D1S~~
SOUTHWOLD TONNSHIP
LOTS 21,22 a 23 - CON,m
-
r.IOO'
-
....
4
a.L.uw. C.ch.,. . ,
-.
SC11.EDUl..'E "pH
~ll and Singula~ tbe ce~tain pa~cel o~ t~act of land and p~emises
situate. lying and being in tbe TovmsbiP of soutbwold. in tbe county
of Elgin. and being composed of:
FIRSTLY tbe No~tb balf of Lot 21. in tbe 'thi~d concession
of tbe Tovmsbip of soutbwold, e1tcept tbat pa~t e1tp~op~iated
by tbe Depa~tment of Higbways by 1'1an Numbe~ D 286.
SECONDLY tbe No~tb-we$t balf of Lot 22 in tbe Tbi~d concession
of tbe TovmsbiP of soutbwold comp~ising of looac~es mo~e o~
leSs e1tcept tbat pa~t taken fo~ ~oad pu~poses by tbe
Depa~tment of Higbways,
THIRDLY tbat pa~t of Lot No, 23 in tbe Tbi~d concession oftbe
said TownsbiP of soutbwold desc~ibed as follows: Co~ENClNG
at tbe No~tb-east co~ne~ of tbe said Lot; Tbence soutb
450 East along itS Easte~lY lUnit 964,92 feet; 'thence ~est
450 soutb 1,980 feet mO~e o~ lesS to tbe ~est limit of
said Lot; 'thence No~tb 450 ~est. 1888.26 feet mo~e o~ lesS
to tbe No~tbe~lY limit of said Lot p~oduced; 'thence East
200 No~tb along tbe No~tbe~lY limit of said Lot to tbe
place of beginning; E1tcept tbat po~tion of tbe above
desc~ibed land cut off by tbe ~oad allowance between concession
2 and 3 in tbe said TovmsbiP of soutbwold.
SCi\E1)UL'E "E"
, 19
THIS CONTRACT made tbis
BET Vl E E N:
daY of
THE C01'ORATI0N O"F THE .
OF . (bereinafter tbe
"l..ocal 1:'\unicipali ty") ,
OF THE "FIRST 1'l\RT,
O"F THE SECOND 1'l\RT.
;.nlERE/l.S tbe O~er o~s and operates a landfilling type of
. . f l..otS 21 22 and 23. concession 3.
~aste dispOsal s~te on part 0 '
in tbe To~sbiP of soutbWold in tbe countY of Elgin;
. .' l..OCal 1:'\unicipalitieS
/l.ND ;.nlERE/l.S tbe O~er baS g~'I7en to certa~n
~ .. . tbe
f 'C01 . n of ~bicb tbe l..OCal 1:'\unicipal~tY ~s one,
in tbe countY 0 ~ g~ ·
rigbt to use tbe said ~aste dispOsal site in accordance ~itb tbe
d dl."tl..ons of a certain /l.greement (bereinafter referred to
termS an con
1976 and made
,
and -
ST. THO~~S S/I.NIT/l.R~ CO~l..ECTI0N
SER~ICE l..11:'\ITED. (bere~nafter tbe
"O-wue-r'1) ,
as tbe \'/l.greement")' dated tbe daY of
f El. fo-r
bet~een tbe ownet: and Tbe Cot:pot:atiOn of tbe countY 0 . g:\.n
and on bebalf of and fot: tbe benefit of tboSe l..ocal 1:'\unicipalitieS
" tb j\g-reement"
in tbe county of Elgin 1'lIot:e pat:tiCulat:1Y set out ~n e '
. . 1. t d s it:eS tbe use of tbe said
/l.ND \i/UER"E/l.S tbe 1~Ocal 1{un~cWa ~ y e ..'
~aste dispOsal site on sucb termS and conditions and baS e~ecuted
and deli'l7et:ed tbis contract pursuant to tbe /l.gree1'llent;
NO~ THEREFORE THIS cONTRACT ~ITNESSETH tbat tbe l..OCal 1:'\unici-
'th tbe owner as follows:
palitY CO'l7enants and agt:ees w~
d f" d' n tbe
In tbiS contt:act all wot:ds and pbt:ases e ~ne ~
d . t nt as
l\gt:eement sball ba'l7e tbe same meaning an ~n e ·
tberein set out as if incot:porated intO and repeated ~n
1.
thiS contract)
t t tbe ~o~eement tbe l..OCal 1:'\unicipalitY bere'
1'ursuan 0 Pp~ ·
. f 11 of itS 1:'\unicipal ~aste at tbe
agrees to d:\.spose 0 a '
site for a term of montbs. co~encing on tbe fir!
, ,
. and ending on tbe last daY
2.
19
day of
. h . d. te.-n tbe l..OCal l1unicipalitY sball pa
Dur~ng t e sa~ ,,~
Cbat:ge in accordance witb tbe
, 1.9
;
3.
J\.nnua1 l' eT
fI,. ~\ lI\
\ I I
- 2 -
provisions in that behalf contained in the Agreement and
in default thereof, the Local Municipality ShElll pay
interest at the rate of 1% per month or part thereof on
4.
overdue accounts, if demanded.
Throughout the term of this Contract the Local Municipal-
ity agrees that it will be bound by all of thE~ terms and
conditions' set out in the Agreement.
5.
Any notice or couullunication required or permitted pursuant
to the Agreement or this Contract to the Local Municipal-
ity shall be deemed to be well and sufficiently given or
served if handed to the Clerk of the Local Municipality
or if mailed to the Local Municipality by prepaid register-
ed post addressed to it at:
or such other address as the Local Municipality may
designate, by written notice, and, if mailed, notice shall
be deemed to have been given and service will be deemed
to have been effected op the fourth business d~y after
mailing.
6.
This Contract shall enure to the benefit of the Owner
and its scucessors in title to the Site and shall be
binding upon the Local Municipality and its successors.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Local Municipality has hereunto affixed
its corporate seal over the hands of its proper officers duly
authorized in that behalf.
THE CORPORATION OF THE
OF
Per:
Per:
Clerk
The execution and delivery
of this Contract has been
authorized by the Local
Municipality's By-law No.
passed this
day of . 19
SCHEDULE "F"
ST. THoMAS SANITARY COLLECtION SERVICE LTD.
AGREEMENT BETWEEN
and
The fol1o",ing DocUlnent comprise Schedule "F" and are deposited in the
<) jl;;".<'l (~.J~..
County of Elgin las(\# \
CORPORATION 01' THE COUNT'{ 01' ELGIN
plan drawn by DeLeU'" Cather, consulting Engineers and planners.
Dated Nov./74
project # 07_137-00
Existing conditions at initial diSposal area~N 1/2
~ot 22 ~ Con. 111 - south",old TwsP.
Map # 1
Existing Local and on_Site Drainage pattern.
Map # 2-A
Existing Regional Drainage Pattern.
Map # 2-B
Map # 3
AppendiX A~1'igure 3-A on_Site Geologic cross Sections Bl_B. Cl_C & nl_D.
Bottom contours.
Final Contours..
Ma.p # 4
Five Year Refuse Disposal plan.
Site preparation outlined in Report.
Map # 5
t~1 4'
,f;.
r'}l
J,.i
..;
p
I:
DATED this
day of
1976.
BET WEE N:
ST. THO~~S SANITARY COLLECTION
SERVICE LIMITED, (hereinafter
the "Owner")
OF THE FIRST FART,
- and -
THE CORPORATION OF THE COUNTY OF
ELGIN, (hereinafter referred to as
the "County") for and on behalf of
and for the benefit of those
LOCAL MUNICIPALITIES in the COUNTY
OF ELGIN, more particulary described
Schedule "A" hereto, (hereinafter
referred to separately as a "Local
Municipali ty'I and together referred
to as the "Local Municipalities"),
OF THE SECOND PART.
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
Part Lots 21, 22 and 23, Concession 3,
Township of Southwold, County of Elgin
WRIGHT AND ASSOCIATES
612-383 Richmond St.,
LONDON, Ontario,
N6A 3C4
\'
'(
~/
SURFACE TREATMENT LIST 1976
CONSTRUCTION
Charge to GC #1
~
Road 3 - from Highway 3 southerly
1
,~
MAINTENANCE
(' 1. St. Thomas Suburban Road CVlluuission
Road 26 - from Road 25 to St. Thomas
(last done in 1971)
2. Middlesex County Line
Road 17 ~ at Southwold Station
(last done in 1970)
3. County
Road 2 - from east limits of West Lorne to
Ecker Drain (last done in 1971 & 73)
Road 8 - (~) from Highway 401 to Road Allowance
between Concession IV and the Gore
(last done in 1972)
(b) from Road 9 northerly
(last done in 1972)
(c) Wal1acetown to Surface Treatment
(last done in 1973)
Road 13 - to complete to Road 14
(last done in 1969)
Road 19 - throughout (last done in 1970 & 73)
~Road 22 - south of Road 27 (last done in 1971)
V Road 23
from Highway 4 to Hot Mix at
Port Stanley (last done in 1971)
Road 28 - south of Elm Street
(plus prime)
Road 45 - from Road 35 to Road 40
(last done in 1971)
(except Hot Mix at Highway 73)
~Road 51 - west of Hot Mix
County
fJp-~::}
Page 1
1.2 miles
0.90 milE~s
0.1 miles
5.0 miles
0.8 miles
0.5 miles
1.6 miles
2.0 miles
3.7 miles
2.0 miles
0.8 miles
0.4 mile
5.1 . miles
0.4 mile
22.3 miles
continued
.-
SURFACE TREATMENT LIST 1976
Page 2
PATCHING
Road 16 - Fingal Hill
Road 29 - ( & Prime)
To finish upgn _ Road 24 from Road 23 to Road 22
CUSTOM WORK
City of St. Thomas & (Prime)
Canada 'Vitrified & (Prime)
Township of Yarmouth
Township of Southwold (2 miles & Prime)
g'}..~
Village of Dutton _ for M;l.ni~try of the Environment '''il/U'71'V.L
Aldborough Township .6 mile
Ministry of Natural Resources at New Glasgow
Check ~ Lyle Willard - Iroquois Beach 874-4691
Malahide - maybe Port Bruce
Bayham ?
Aylmer ?
South Dorchester ?
Port Stanley ?
":~
COUNTY OF ELGIN
GRADER TENDERS
Net after Trade In. Sales Tax Exempt.
1. Dominion Road Machinery Sales Limited,
P. O. Box 308,
Goderich, Ontario.
Champion 0-740
176 HP GM6-71N Motor
Snow Plow
TOTAL
2. Renash Tractor & Equipment Limited,
P. O. Box 670,
Lambeth, Ont&rio.
John Deere Model JD670
(125 HP only)
(Does not meet Specifications)
3. General Supply Company of Canada (1973) Ltd.,
5280 Dixie Road,
Mississauga, Ontario.
Galion T600 Series B
(Includes 4 speed automatic
transmission).
TOTAL
4. Crothers Limited,
50 Enterprise,
London, Ontario.
Caterpillar Model 140G
150 HP
Plow
TOTAL
5. Capital Equipment Ltd.,
2 Royal Crest Road,
Rexdale, Ontario.
Clark (Austin Western) Super 301
Plow
TOTAL
,?
6. Renash Tractor & Equipment Limited,
P. O. Box 670,
Lambeth, Ontario.
t
John Deere Model JD770
Plow
TOTAL
$ 47,400
6,100
$ 53,500
$ .54,421
$ 56,591
$ 62,565
8,500
$ 71,065
$ 64,570
8,480
$ 73,050
$ 64,048
9,309
$ 73,357
~ jy;- p
-r~
/
June 9, 1976
~~~
~
QUOTATIONS FOR PRIMER AND EMULSION
June 1976
1~
I
I
(Cents Per Gallon)
FOB Factory
Freisht
Total
PRIMER
GuI f Canada Ltd.,
Clarkson
36.25
4.99ct
41.24
Imperial Oil Ltd.,
London
37.7
3.77
41.47
EMULSION CATIONIC RSIK
1. F1intkote Co. of Canada Ltd. 35.2 .5.3 40.5
Long Branch
2. Chevron Asphalt Ltd. 40.1 5.6 45.7
Toronto
3. T. J. Pounder 37.9 5.2 43.1
Brampton
4. Nor-John Contracting Ltd., 36.2 5.8 42.0
Niagara Falls
5. R. E. Law Crushed Stone Ltd., 33.8 5.8 39.6
Port Co1borne
j
to'. 'i.
~~.
.1" --
DATED this
day of
,l9
~i
BET WEE N:
THE. CORPORATION OF THE
OF (hereinafter the
"Local Municipali ty")
OF THE FIRST PART,.
_ ...... A
- Q.uu
ST. THOMAS SANITARY COLLECTION
SERVICE LIMITED, (hereinafter the
"Owner"),
OF THE SECOND PART,
WASTE DISPOSAL CONTRACT
ST. THOMAS, ONTARI0.
JUNE 9, 1976.
'PAGE 1.
['
( on June 9, 1976. Also members, egCept Reeves Wilson and Nemett in attendance.
THE COUNTY OF ELGIN ROAD COMMITTEE MET at the MUnicipal Building
THE MJ.NUTES OF T1:1:E MEETING OF MAY 12 were read and approved.
THE ENGINEER REPORTED ON THE WORK to date as folloWS:
1. Walmsley BroS. had completed Asphalt Paving on Road 42, 45 and 46 and
would complete work in Rodney and West Lorne for the Villages by the
2. Repairs had been made to Road 3 in Rodney and charged to carlinghill
weekend.
3. constructiOn was continuing in Dutton with nearly all the curb and ~tter
construction.
4. Pavement "Marking waS underway with the City of St. Thomas being completed.
completed.
5. One culvert had been replaced and one lowered for the Village of Dutton
6. work waS underway on lowering the culvertS on the Brown Drain on Road 13
on the BroVffi Drain.
7. The bearings on the WardSville Bridge had been replaced and tests on the
in Dutton, the work to be charged to the drain.
concrete in the piers of the Middlemiss Bridge would be tested on thursdaY
8. Gravel Shouldering had been completed on Road 42 and Road 45 after Paving
and Friday.
and waS underway on Road 45 between Calton and Highway 19.
10. Grader work had been done on the port Talbot Rills on Road 16 to improve
9. Shoulder work waS underway on Road 46 after Paving.
drainage and an asphalt curb and gutter would be placed on the east hill
as constant washoutS were filling the catch basins.
11. Asphalt patching on roads to be surface Treated would start shortly.
12. A fence had been built for the City of St. Thomas on the property line
between F. O. Lewis and the St. Thomas Reservoir.
ST. THOMAS, ONTARIO.
JUNE 9, 1976.
PAGE 2.
13. Calcium Chloride work had been completed except for road shoulders.
14. An interim Soils Report had been received from Golder's indicating about
6 to B feet of soft silt~ below the stream bed of the Kettle Creek
at the proposed crossing site of Road 52 culverts. While this would add to
the expense, the site was still the most practical crossing site and surveys
were continuing.
Armco Canada waS revising their design which would have to be at right angles
to the road to be practical.
June or early July. some stripping work waS underway and Riggs Dragline
would dig some test holes near the east property line.
15. Mac McLaWS would be crushing more gravel at the Pleasant Valley Pit in late
16. Culvert installation on Road 52 and 30 would not take place until July.
17. The Engineer presented the attached list of roads to be surface treated as
a Maintenance Operation.
THE ENGLNEER PRESENTED A LLST of Tenders on a Grader as attached.
"MOVED BY:
L. R. CARROLL
SECONDED BY: G. W. MONTELTR
THAT WE ACCEPT THE TENDER OF DOMLNLON ROAD MACRLNERY SALES LTD.
FOR A cBAMl'LON MODEL 740 GRADER COMPLETE m:rR PLoW AT TRELR TENDERED
PRL CE OF $ 53,500 WL TR TRE COUNTY OF ELG"lN GRADER # 11 AS A TRADE LN.
ALL SUBJECT TO TRE MLNLSTRY OF TRANSPORTATLON AND cQMM!JNLCATLONSl
APPRO V AL.
CARRIED.H
"MOVED BY:
s. J. GLOVER
SECONDED BY: M. A. SCHAFER
THAT THE FOLLoW'lNG PA'iLLSTS BE APPROVED FOR PAYMENT.
PA'iLLST # 24 AMOUNTLNG TO
PA'iLLST # 25 AMOUNT"lNG TO
PA'iLLST # 26 AMoUNTLNG TO
PA'iLLST # 27 AMOUNTLNG TO
PA'iLLST # 2B AMoUNTLNG TO
$ 33,825.45
$ 12,417.99
$ 32,547.83
$ 205 .19
$ 266,745.59
CARRIED .'l
ST. THOMAS, ONTARIO.
.JUNE 9, 1976.
PAGE 3.
NO TENDERS FOR LOTS ON JOHN STREET in Dutton had been received.
Sale of these lots was discussed at some length.
"MOVED BY: G. W. MONTEITH
SECONDED BY: L. R. CARROLL
THAT THE ENGINEER BE EMPOWERED TO PLACE THE 2 LOTS ON JOHN STREET
IN DUTTON IN THE HANDS OF A REAL ESTATE AGENT FOR SALE. (JXfULTIPLE
LISTING)
CARRIED."
THE MEETING ADJOURNED FOR DINNER.
AFTER DINNER REEVE WILSON PRESENT.
THE ENGINEER PRESENTED Quotations as attached for Emulsion and Primer.
"MOVED BY: G. D. SIMPSON
SECONDED BY: G. W. MONTEITH
THAT WE ACCEPT THE QUOTATION OF R. E. LAW CRUSHED STONE LTD. FOR
CATIONIC EMULSION RSIK AT THEIR QUOTED PRICE OF 33.8 CENTS PER GALLON
F .O,.B. THEIR PLANT AT PORT COLBORNE. IF THE QUALITY OR SERVICE IS NOT
SATISFACTORY THE TENDER TO REVERT TO FLINTKOTE COMPANY AT 35.2 CENTS PER
GALLON F.O.B. THEIR! PLANT AT LONG BRANCH. ALL SUBJECT TO THE MINISTRY
OF TRANSPORTATION AND COMMUNICATIONS ' APPROVAL.
CARRIED."
"MOV]~D BY: M. A. SCHAFER
SECONDED BY: G. D. SIMPSON
THAT WE ACCEPT THE QUOTATION OF GULF CANADA LTD. FOR ASPHALT PRIMER
F.O.B. THEIR PLANT AT CLARKSON AT 36.25 CENTS PER GALLON. SUBJECT TO
THE MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION AND COMMUNICATIONS' APPROVAL.
CARRIED."
ST. THOMAS, ONTARIO.
JUNE 9, 1976.
PAGE 4.
CORRESPONDENCE WAS READ FROM
The Village of Port Stanley regarding rezoning of Koscis property on
George Street tl
THE ENGINEER REPORTED THAT TESTS were being made on the concrete
piers of the Middlemiss Bridge to determine the quality of concrete so that
the feasibility of repairs could be determined.
A Soils Report had been received from Golders which showed that
soil pressure against the north abutment could force the abutment to move
toward the river. To stop the condition it would be necessary to construct
an approach span. The practicality of this and repairs to the main chord
would be discussed with the Ministry of Transportation and Communications Bridge
Office as soon as possible.
The Application of the North Shore Farming Co. Ltd. for rezoning to
Pit and Quarry zoning for the land at the intersection of County Road 22 and
45 was discussed at the request of Yarmouth Township.
The Committee agreed that the location of entrances (one on each road)
should be part of the Agreement as will an Agreement to sell to the County a
17 foot road widening on Road 22.
A variance in the set back permitted by County By-Law of Buildings
on Road 28 proposed by Glen Donald was discussed. Chairman Cook stated he
would look further into the matter.
The Township of Yarmouth requested the County rent them a mower tractor
for the Summer.
"MOVED BY:
L. R. CARROLL
SECONDED BY: G. W. MONTEITH
THAT WE RENT THE TOWNSHIP OF YARMOUTH A SMALL TRACTOR TO CUT WEEDS
FOR THE SUMMER.
CARRIED."
ST. THOMAS, ONTARIO.
JUNE 9, 1976.
PAGE 5.
THE ENGINEER PRESENTED THE APPRAISAL ON THE FERGUSON property on
Road 52 and was authorized by the Cvuuuittee to use it as a basis for negotiations
with the Fergusons.
Arrangements for the Roads and Transportation Association of Canada
Convention in Quebec City were discussed.
Road inspection for East Elgin was postponed indefinitely.
A request by the Elgin Hiking Club to cut a trail through the
County property at White Station was denied.
The attached Proposed Agreement with the St. Thomas Sanitary Collection
Services Ltd. was presented and discussed at some length and amended in a number
of places.
"MOVED BY: M. A. SCHAFER
SECONDED BY: S. J. GLOVER
THAT DRAFT 3 OF THE PROPOSED AGREEMENT BETWEEN ST. THOMAS SANITARY
COLLECTION SERVICES LTD. AND THE COUNTY OF ELGIN BE PRESENTED TO
COill'1TY COUNCIL.
CARRIED."
"MOVED BY: G. D. SIMPSON
SEca~DED BY: L. R. CARROLL
THAT WE ADJOURN TO JULY 14 AT 10 :00 A.M.
CARRIED."
~~~/~~
.'CHAIRMAN
,rl l
/ . . ~( j:)A~-If .w..
THIS AGREEHEN.T made thisC#i'day on, ~~. 1976. IlJ h' < ~
BET H E EN: ~,v~'
ST. THOMAS SANITARY COLLECTION SERVICE .~
LIMITED, (hereinafter the "Owner"),
OF THE FIRST PART,
\
i':\
- and -
THE CORPORATION OF THE COUNTY OF ELGIN,
(hereinatter referred to as the "County") .
for and on behalf of and for the benefit
._of~ those LOCAL MUNICIPALITIES in' the
COUNTY OF ELGIN, more particularly de-
scribed Schedule "A" hereto, (hereinafter
re~ferred to separately as a "Local l1unici-
pality" and together referred to as the .
"Local Municipalities"),
OF THE SECOND PAR'l\
HHEREAS the Owner owns certain land in the Township of Southwald
in the County of Elgin hereinafter mentioned and described and is
desirous of using the same as a landfi.ll type of waste disposal site;
AND \lliEREAS the Owner has agreed to grant to the Local Munici-
palities, and to each of them, separately, the right to use the said
waste disposal site during the useful life thereof on the te.L11lS .:ind
conditions hereinafter set forth;
NOW THEREFORE THIS AGREEMENT HITNESSETH that: in consideration of
$l.OO now paid to it by the County (receipt whereof is her.~by acknow-
ledged) the Owner covenants and agrees with the County for and on be-
half of and for the benefit of the Local Municipalities and each of
them, separately, as follows:
l.
1.1
In this Agreement:
"Access Road" means that portion of the Townline Road which
I
X/\ \J /"
../ (), ,.1.
), '"", i, /
I .. \ f. /'./""t
/ / ~ Y\Li
\,' ../ '
.......c..
fonns the north boundary of the Township of Sou.thwold betweet
its intersection with Highway No. 4 on the east and its in-
tersection with the Third Concession Road on the west and
that portion of the Third Concession Road for its intersec-
I
tion with the Tovmline Road as aforesaid to the entrance of
the Site;
1.2
T'lle "Additional Cost" in a calendar year shall mean the
actual cost to the Owner of:
(a) any necessary or expedient payment made to The
Corporation of the To"\mship of Southwold, whet]hel~
a lump sum, a ~oyalty or periodic payment or other
wise,
(b) any necessary or expedient provision of waste
,
-~
(>,
.I."
lJ"\"
V\ {~ i'~A <i
................."...... .....,..'.~".......~...
~\
- L -
disposal service to The Corporation of the
Wo
Township of Southewld, or its residents, at
charges for each ton of Waste so disposed of
less than the Disposal Rate Per Ton at the time
of such service, and the actual cost to the
Owner of such service shall be deemed to be the
difference between the actual charge, if any,
for such service and the amount determined by
multiplying the Disposal Rate Per Ton in that
year, by the actual ntllllber of tons of Waste so
disposed of,
(c) any construction or maintenance of roads which
are not en the Site for whieh it is neces~ary
or expedient for the Owner to pay,
(d) any payment or expense or the doing of anything
which becomes necessary and which is not neces-
sary at the date hereof, and
(e) any payment or expense or the doing of anything
required after the date hereof for the protec-
tion of the environment on or in the vicinity of
the Site, including the control, collection and
treatment of leachate or gases and t~e monitor-
ing, sampling and testing of ground ,and surface
water; save and except the cost of the instal-
lation of the leachate drains and collection
pond contemplated by the Owner's current design
for the Site, as shown on Schedule rtF" hereto;
and for the purposes of this definition of Additional Cost.
"necessary" means required by any Federal or Provincial
stat:ute or regulation or by any municipal by-law or regu-
lati.on or by any government or regulatory body or agency in
connection with the establishment, use, maintenance and
operation of the Site, and "e:x;pedient" means, requested,
authorized or approved, in writing, by^the County; and.
further, where the Owner has incurred a.n actual cost in a
calendar year which ought to be amortized over a period
1.4
- 3 -
in excess of one year in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, such cost shall be. so amortized with
all necessary adjustments for interest actually paid by the
O\mer in connection 'vi th the securing of the funds to pay
such cost, and reasonable administrative expenses in
connection therewith; and the Additional Cost for the year
in which such cost is incurred shall be accordingly adjusted
and the Additional Cost for all subsequent calendar years
shall be adjusted, as well, until such actual cost, interest,
if any, and expenses, if any, are fully amortized and paid;
The "Additional Ton Rate" in a calendar year shall be the
amount determined by dividing the Additional Cost for that
yea! by the Total Annual Tonnage for that ye~r;
The "Annual Per Capita Charge" in a calendar year to be pai.d
by a Local Municipality under contract with the Owner here-
under wherein such Local Municipality bas agreed to pay for
the use of the Si.te an Annual Per Capita Charge, shall be the
amount deteJ..Ulined by multiplying such Local Municipality's
Per Capita User Rate for that year by the population of that
Local Municipality for the iuuuediately preceding calendar
year as established by the last revised assessment roll of
such Local Municipality according to the records, of the local
Regional Assessment Office of the Ministry of Treasury,
Econonlics and Intergovernmental Affairs after deducting from
such population the number of the residents of institutions
locate!d within such Local Municipality, such as hospitals,
provincial, municipal and private Homes for the Aged, Col-
leges and schools to the extent that the residents of such
institutions were included in the population of such Local
Municipality; provided that, in respect of the calendar years
in which the te.LlU of such contract COllUUences or te.Llllinates J
the Annual Per Capita Charge to be paid by such l.ocal Munici-
pality under such contract. in such calendar year' shall be
calculated by multiplying the Annual Per Capita Charge to
such Local Municipality (dete.Lulined as if it werE~ under con-
tract for that entire calendar year) by the numbe~r of months
in thclt year during which such contract was in force and. by
dividing the product so obtained by 12;
. ~
l.3
.!'
.~
- 4 -
1.5
The "Annual Per Ton Charge" in a calendar year to be paid
by a Local Municipality under contract with the Owner
her€~under wherein such Local Municipality has agreed to pay
for the use of the Site an Annual Per Ton ChargE~, shall
be the amount determined by multiplying the Disposal Rate
Per Ton for that year by the number of tons of such Local
Municipality's 'Municipal Waste brought to the Site for
disposal in that year by employees of such Local Municipal-
ity or by any person under contract with sl.lch Local Munici-
pality for the haulage of such Municipal Waste or by the
1.6
employees of any such haulage contractor;
"A'ct:!"means The Environmental Protection Act, 1971, as
l.7
amended, and all regulations thereunder, as amenqed;
The "Base Operational Ton Rate" in a calendar YE~ar shall
be determined in accordance with Schedule "B" by reference
to the Total Annual Tonnage in that year, and shall be
the amount in column 2 of Schedule "B" set oppoHite the
appropriate Total Annual Tonnage range in column 1 of
SchE~dule "B";
1.8
The "Disposal Rate Per Ton" in a calendar year f;hall be
the amount which is the aggregate of the following amounts:
(a) the Operational Ton Rate for that year,
(b) the Ownership Ton Rate for t:hat year, and
(c) the Additional Ton Rate' for that yea:c;
l.9
"Effective Date" means the day upon which this Agreement
comE~S into force and effect as provided in paragraph 19
herE~of ;
~
I. I C
"Garbage" means the following types of abandoned or dis-
gar(1ied t'Jaste generated, produced or crE~ated by ,a House-
ho lder.:
All animal and vegetable waste material f~rom the pre-
paration of food, cans, sweepings, paper, cardboard,
c
wearing apparel, ashes, bottles, glass, distarded
household utensils, lawn and hedge cu1:ti.ngs, leave.s,
twigs v shrubs, brush and tree limbs;
,.J.-;-W
"Ha:~ardous Substance" means a substance which, because of
. I I
. . I its physical or chemical nature or because of the form in
J
I /"
--l-:-tt f. ! ('"
l. iZ-
( I ::
~rr
/ I L!-
, J '
~"
I, I 5
~tn
\J~~ ·
~
/,I{
_1......:r6-
11/ I 7
"
__l.-J:-r
I,) C
- 5 -
which it exists may explode or become ignited easily or
cause intense flames or which constitutes a health hazard
to the Owner's servants, agents or employees by reason of
their handling the same;
"Householder" means the occupant of residential premises,
whether the owner, lessee, tenant or otherwise;
The "Life of the Si teU means the period corrunencing on th'e
Effective Date of this Agreement and en~ing upon the 'date
when the Owner may no longer dispose of Waste in the Waste
Disposal Area as provided in paragraph 19 hereof;
The HMunicipa1 Waste" of a municipality shall mean the
following types of Waste generated, produced or created
,qithin the territorial" limits of such municipality:
(a) Garbage from Householder,
(b) Waste from institutions such as hospitals,
Homes for the Aged, Colleges and schools, and
(c) an amount of commercial waste not in ex.cess of
the amount so generat~d, produced or created
,/
and disposed of by such mun.icipality in the
calendar year of 1976.
The "'Operational Ton Rate"^for each ensuing calendar yea.r
shall be calculated by multiplying the Base pp~r~tional Ton
Rate for that year by a factor deteLwined by dividing
I the Consumer Price Index for December of t~e iuwlediately
I prec.eding year by the Consumer Price Index f~r December
C,,-, ,..pf 1975;
The "Ownership Ton Rate" in a calendar year shall"be
dete.l..111ined in accordance with Schedule "B" by reference
to the Total Annual Tonnage in that year and shall be
the amount in Coluuu... 3 of Schedule "B" set opposite the
appropriate Total Annual Tonnage range in column 1
of Schedule "B";
The "Per Capita User Rate" in a calendar year shall be
an amount dete.l..Ulined by multiplying the Disposal Rate
Per Ton, for that year by O.365;^
"Site" means those lands f "including st.ructures thereon..
.
shown in Schedule ne" hereto, and as more particularly
described in Schedule uD" hereto;
~
/. . c'
, {!
.,(. ,,( ,J'"
r~~tlU",~~
fl . /'./
,J' \,\.V'
\\", ,.....,.: .
\ ~,' I //;\/.,//1
/i, \,
\.Y/' f',i"A.,
,(\ \ l.
"'I /- .
\,. ., 'f/l'
j \ I ".~ I
I \ ~ Ii
\/ . './, JL ;/...
, , //, '..y--
I'ft/ f .' I ...e"'"
,I ..I/~'./ //
",//
/
(0 .t6) - /C folt t
_l..-1,9-
/ ' r'! C
- 0 -
The "Total Annual Tonnage" of the Site in any calendar year
shall be calculated by deducting from the aggregate of the
following:
(a)
the nwnber of tons of Hunicipal H~Jj~e of the
f:) -c. {~'v
Township of Southwold or of any ~~~~~"".l:~-'"
(b)
.--_...
Municipalitiesl\brought to the' Site for disposal
in that calendar yea~, and
the actual number of tons of \-1aste from any
industrial or cOlwlercial source (not otherwise
included in subclause (a) above) brought to the
Site in that calendar. year for disposal, in-
eluding such Waste as is to be processed,
t~ if
\t..~".,.;~'1,'
\ i:'. I. / recycled or reclaimed,
\ r' .'.
\ ~ (j '" '-,'..,"'\ q S:f . '1 "
the"::a~-r;e,g'at~'~'fv':tl1e ~'a~~~~- number of tons of:
(c) earthfill material entering the Site i.n that
calendar year for the purpose of cover material
or top 50i.111
(d)' materialj such as earthfill, granular materiaL
foundry sand, broken tile, etc, enterin.g the
Site'in that calendar year for the purpose of
building and maintaining roads', and
(e) material which, having been processed; recycled
or reclaimed and sold, is transported from the
Site in that calendar year;
provided that in respect of the broken calendar years
at the beginning and at the end of the Life of the Site,
the Total Annual Tonnage shall be calculated by multiply-
ing the Total Annual Tonnage for such broken calendar year~
dete~wined as foresaid, by the number of months during
such broken calendar year. when the Waste Disposal Area was
actually in use for the disposal of Waste and by dividing
the product so obtained by 12;
"VIas te~" means Garbage or refus e or domes tic J indus trial
or conmercial waste of any kind including waste within the
meaning of the Act, save and except the following:
(a) explosive or highly combustible material of any
nature,
~
. I ~.
\
... 7 ...
(0) car bodies.
(c)
(d)
sbeet iron and sct:ap metal.
d tt:ees baving a diametet: greatet:
tt:ee stumps an
.d a lenotb gt:eater tban 4 feet.
tban 10 ~ncbes an t>
. ....T.e. or to~iC matet:ial,
anY co-r-rOS1.V
anY carcasses of animals.
liq.uid 'Waste t
(e)
(f)
(g)
(b)
any HazardouS substance.
. . d \(.ind as is nO~ ot: may
(i) waste of any natut:e an · .
bet:einafte-r at anY time be p't"obibited fot: d:\.s-
1 t t~e site bY t:eason of any statute or
posa a" .
. . f tbe l't:ovince of ontat:io no~ ot:
-regulatl.Oll 0
. d nt:omulgated ot: amended;
bereaftet: enacte · r
.. tbe land ~itbin tbe Site upon.
"~aste DispOsal l\t:ea means ·
b deposited in accot:dance ~l-t'b
'ntO ot: in ~bicb ~aste may e
:\. l' ued to tbe
tbe l't:ovisional cet:tificate of /l.ppt:O'l7a :\.SS
b /l.c\- at t1"\e
.. t. f tbe 5i te pu-r&Uant to t. e ..
O"'T'r"\. et: :\.n -respec. . o. .
"',. . d It n -red on
. 1 d' s sbo~ and outl~ne 1-
date bereof. ~b:\.cb an. ~
2.
"e" be-retO.
Scbedu1e to eacb and eve-ry
. revocablY grantS .
oM-e O~et: bet:ebY 1--r · to entet: intO
J.I.~ 1 tne opt1..on
1. se1?at:ate y. .
Local ,!:,\unici?a :\.ty. · 'nal ~aste at tbe
. osal of its ,!:,\un:\.c:\.r
a contt:a.ct for tbe d:\.sp . and f-rotl\ time to time
. d at any t1.1l\e
ma" deC1- e. · ·
site. as tbeyJ . . sand cond1-t1-ot\s
S.te on tbe term
. f of the 1..
du-ring tbe 1..:\. e
. a&tet: set fortb.
he-rel.ll .L
3.
f r tbe use of tbe
.ntO a cont-ract 0
. to ente"X' ~ ~
sucb opt:\.on _ . nd every Local-
fo"t e~ercise by anY a .' .
site sball be open. 1..' fe of tbe site and
time during tbe 1-
'!:'\unicipalitY at anY .' ucn option sball do SO
. .lity e~erc~s:\.ng s .
eacb Local ~un~c~1?a ~.~et: a contt:act in
. .! ng to tbe V 'IV ..-
. and del:\.Ver.1- iate-
by e~ecut1..ng 1 1'f." bet:etO \ ap"!?"topr -
form of scbedu e
substantiallY tbe
.. f. .. g t'he-rein ~
1 dated. spec~ y:\.1\ d
Y of tbe contract. an · ..
(a) tbe term tbe Local ~uniC1-pal~tY
during sucb term
(b) ~betbet:. .Cha-rae 01.': an
1 pet: ca?~ta t>
'Will paY an /l.nnua
1 'Oe. 't TOl"\. cna-rge,
J\.nu ua. ~
- 8 -
4.
and otherwise completed and accompanied by an E~nabling by-
law of such Local Municipality, certified by the Clerk
under seal, authorizing the execution and delivery of such
contract; and upon receipt thereof by the Owner, a binding
contract shall come into existence between the Owner and
the Local Municipality in accordance with the terms and
conditions of the contract so delivered and th:is Agreement.
The term to be specified in con~racts as aforesaid,
(a) shall COUUllence not less than two months after
the date of the delivery thereof to the Owner.
(b) shall COUUllence at the beginning of ,a month and
shall end at the end of a month,
(c) shall not be less than five years where the
Local Municipality delivering the contract has
not previously exercised its option hereunder
to do so, and
(d) othE~rwise)' shall not be less than three years.,..
Thi.s Agreement and the options herein. granted shall not
be binding upon the Owner until the Effective Date, but
any Local Municipality may execute and deliver a contract
as p~ovided in paragra.ph 3 hereof at any time before the
Effective Date and such contract shall be deemed to have
bee~n delivered to the Owner two months before the
Effective Date.
Thi.s Agreement, and all contracts with Local Municipalities
made pursuant to this Agreement shall be binding upon the
Owtler only during the Life of the Site; and as well, if the
Total Annual Tonnage in any calendar year during the Life
of the Site exceeds 85,000 tons or is less than 30,000
tOllS, then this Agreement and all contracts with Local
Municipalities made pursuant to this Agreement shall
teJLll1inate at the end of such calendar year and shall not
thlereafter be binding upon the Owner ./\
In the case that a Local Municipality is under contract
to pay to the Owner an Annual Per, Ton Charge, at the end of
each month during the term of such contract and in respect
of that month, the Owner shall render to such Local Munici.-
pality an invoice for an amount equal to the number of tons:
5.
6.
7 .
. 0
. x>
\ ~.~
\ ,'.,l(, , "
" \ '\\ ,r
\, i ',.\:'....t".-..j..
""'-" \~\"\i I
'". ~"-, ,\j''''- I
",~ \, /
'\ f\ /
'\, ,/ \'11'1\
""- j -""', \\,
i \ \
/ ." "'"
I ' ,
8.
- ';1 -
of such Local Municipality's Municipal Waste brought to the
Site for disposal in such month by such Local Municipality's
employees, a person under contract with such Local Munici-
pality for the haulage of such Municipal Waste or the employ-
ees of such a haulage contractor, multiplied by an estimate
of the Disposal Rate Per Ton for the calendar year in which
/ such month falls.. Such Local Municipality ~hall pay to the
O\vuer the amount set forth in the monthly invoice, rendered
as aforesaid, on or before the 10th day of the month follow-
ing the month in respect of which such invoice is rendered:
At thE~ end of each calendar year, f the Annual Per Ton Charge
to such Local Municipality for that year shall be dete.Lluined
and all proper adjustments shall be made in the accounts
betweE~n the Owner and such Local Municipality for that cal-
endar year; and in the event that the aggrega.te amount of
the monthly payments for such calendar year exceeds the
amount properly payable, t.he Own.er shall reba te. the diff(~r-
ence to such Local Municipality on or before the 10th day of
February of the following year; and in the event that the
aggregate amount of the monthly payments for such calendar
year is less than the amount, properly payable, such Local
Munic:lpality shall pay the difference to the Owner on or
before the 10th day of February of the follow~ng year.
In the case that a Local Municipality is under contract to
pay tc:> the Owner an Annual Per Capi ta Charge, at the end
of each month during the te.LW of such contract, and in re-
spect of that month, the Owner shall render to such Local
Municipality an invoice for an amount equal to one twelveth
of the estimated Annual Per Capita Charge for the calendar
year in which such month falls. Such Local Municipalit.y shall
pay to the OWner the amount set forth in the monthly invoice,
rendered as aforesaid, on or before the 10th day of the month
follo~ing the month in respect of which the invoice is re-
endered. At the end of each calendar year, the Annual Per
Capita Charge to such Local Municipality for thai calendar
year shall be dete.Lluined and all prope.r', adjustments .shall be
made in-the accounts between the Owner and such Local Munici-
7
(
10.
',.
/ \
! . I
l~. '.D~ ",.;','7,/0
\, /' l'
~. ,/ Sf
\ .\,,/ /
""'~'
,/~'
rt'1T"'''''''.'
ll.
12.
t
- 11
posal at the Site in any calendar year, pursuant to such
contract, any amount of such Local Municipality~s Municipal
Haste in excess of an amount obtained by multiplying such
Local Municipality's Annual Per Capita Charge for that year
by O.4Aand by dividing the product so obtained by such Local
Municipality's Per Capita User Rate for that year.
The O"tvner shall dispose of, at the SitE~, at its then pre- ,
vailing cOcu:..lercial disposal rates as posted up at the
... ..---..,_.-~,.'"'-"."....:;---~~~.=-~~.
Si tE~:
(a) c01l1mercial waste in excess of the lillnits pre-
scribed in clause (c) of subclause 1..l3 of
Section 1 of this Agreement;,and,
, (, ';
(b) in thecase.of a Local Municipality under con-
tract hereunder to pay the Owner an Annual Per
Capi ta Charge, Murticipal "las te in exees s of the
limits prescribed in Section 9 of this Agreement,
! -
geri'e~'ated, _pro~~<:e~_~.~E_..~,~eat_~~_...~.~!E_~~._!~:,~._ terri torial
limits of any Local Municipality under contract with the
Owner hereunder and brought to the Site for disposal by
any such Local Municipality's employees, any person under
contract with such Local Municipality for the haulage of
such Waste or the employees of any such haulage_contractor.
Subject to causes beyond its control, 1:he Owner shall, as a
min:ltmum, keep the Site open for the receiving of \vas~e for
disposal between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p~m., Monday
through Friday, in each week, provided however, the Site
may:. in the di!.scretion of the Owners be closed on statutory
holidays.
The OWner shall cause a weigh ticket to be issued for
every load of l.Jaste entering the Site.. Such weigh. ticket
shall show the date, name of the hauler, the origin of
the load, the person on whose behalf it is brought to the
Sitle and the net weight of the load measured by weighing
the vehicle both in and out of the Site; provided that
in the case of a load of the Hunicipal Waste of a Local
Municipality under contract with the Owner hereunder, for
all purposes of this Agreement, the net weight of such a
load shall be deemed to be the greater of the actual net
- 12 -
l3.
weight thereof or one ton. Duplicate copies of all such
issued weigh tickets shall be retained by the Owner and
the Owner shall sUuuaarize the said weigh tickets and shall
forward such sUffirnaries on a monthly basis to each Local
Municipality under contract with the Owner pursuant to
thi.s Agreement.
The Owner shall make and keep detailed records and sup-
porting vouchers relating to the calculation of Additional
Cost and the weigh tickets issued at the Site. All such
records, vouchers and weigh tickets shall be open to
thE~ inspection and audit of any Local Municipality under
contract with the Owner hereunder or such Local Munici-
pality's authorized nominee at any time during regular
business hours at the Site throughout the term of such
contract with the Owner and for one year subsequent to
thE~ expiration of the teJ.lll of such contract and the County
"may at an.y time during__th:._,_~:!:fe of .!~te conduct su.~~~.~!l
inspection and audit and oversee the weighing of vehicles
in and out of the Site.
Save with respect to the computation of an Annual Per Ton
Charge or an Annual Per Capita Charge, which Charges shall
be calculated and rounded to the nearest cent, all other
calculation required orpeLwittted by this Agreement shall
be made to the sixth decimal and shall be rounded to the
fifth decimal.
In the event that a Local Municipality at any time during
the term of a contract with the Owner hereunder contracts
with a person for the haulage of its Municipal Waste to the
Site on behalf of the Local Municipality, the Local Munici-
pality shall take all such steps as a.re reasonably available
to it from time to time to ensure that such haulage contrac-
tor and his employees shall accurately account: to the Local
Municipality and the Owner for such l~Taste so hauled to
the Site as distinct from waste hauled to the Site by the
same haulage contractor on behalf of others.
The Owner shall be entitled to rely upon the accuracy of
representations made to its weigh scale operator as to
the origin and type of Haste brought to the Site and as
14.
15.
16.
~.,
. -
- l3 -
to the person on whose behalf such 'vaste is brought to
the Site, made by any person who is an. employee of a
Local Municipality under contract with the OwnE~r hereunder
or who is a person under contract with such a I,ocal
Municipality for the haulage of its Municipal Waste or
the employee of such haulage contractor.
17.
Inasmuch as the Owner is not at the date hereof: authoriz-
ed by the Act to permit the use of the Site for the dis-
posal of Waste created, produced or generated within the
territorial limits of some of the Local Municipalities"
it is a condition precedent to the use of the Site by
sueh Loc~l Municipalities and to the execution and deliv-
ery by such a Local Municipality of a contract hereunder
that the Owner first obtain such necessary authorizations;
and until such necessary authorizations are obtained, the
Owner shall. be under no obligation hereun.der to suc.h
Loc!al Municipalties) except that the Owner agrE~es to use
its best effo~ts to obtain such nec~ssary authorizations.
18.
Nothing herein shall'limit the Owner's right to enter
into agreements with other parties with respect to the
disposal of l.Jaste, whether or not such Waste i,:3 generated,
produced or created within the territorial lim:its of any
'of the Local Municipalities and, whether or not such
Waste is the subject of this Agreement; nor shall any-
thing herein limit the Owner's right to enter :into agree-
I
ments 'with respect to the provision of additional services
in connection with the disposal of t-laste pursu1ant to this
Agreement or contracts entered into with Local Municipal-
ties hereunder.
19.
This Agreement shall only become effective and binding
upon the Owner when the Owner is in a position to deposit
Waste in the Waste Di.sposal Area without being in contra-
vention of any Federal or Provincial statute or regulation,
any municipal by-law or regulation, or any law, order,
injunction or restraint whatsoever imposed by any Court
of competent jurisdiction or by any government or regu-
latory body or agency; and the day upon which the Owner
is in such a position shall be the Effective Date of
this Agreement and the Life of the Site shall terminate
I
when the deposit of vlaste in the Haste Disposal Area
becomes a contravention as aforesaid.
20.
Any notice or communication to the Owner shall be deemed
to be well and sufficiently given or served if handed
to any officer of the Owner or if mailed to the Owner
by prepaid regis,tered post addressed to it at R. R. #5,'
St. Thomas, Ontario or such other address as the Owner
may designate, by written notice, and, if mailed, notice
shall be deemed to have been given and service~shall be
deemed to have been effected on the fourth business day
after mailing.
21.
The County may, at the request of any Local Municipality,
i
take such actio~ and do such things as may be necessary or
desirahle to enforce this Agreement for and all' bebalfaf
such Local Municipality or all of the Local Municipalities~
but the County is under no obligation whatsoever so to do.
22.
In the event that the County acquires or assumes direct
responsiblity, either by legislation or agreement, for the
provision of facilities for the disposal of the Municipa.l
Haste generated, produced or created within ~he t~~!ritorial
limits of any of the Local Municipalities, the County shall
be entitled to all rights, benefits and options contained in
this Agreement in the place and stead of any such. Loca1
Muni~il)ality ~ and if, at the time of such acquisiti.Qn. or
ass~ption of re~pons;Lbili ty, a.ny such Loca.l ':Muni.c:ipality is
under' contract with the Owner hereunder, the County shall
assume all of such Local Municipalityts obligatioIls to the
Own~r pursuant to such contractf
23.
This Agreement shall ensure to the benefit of the Local
Municipalities and each of them, separately, and their
(
respective successors and shall enure to the benefit
of and shall be binding upon the Owner, its successors
in title to the Site and it shall run 't-lith the la.nd.
- 15 -
IN HITNESS HHEREOF St. Thomas Sanitary Collection Service
Limited and The Corporation of the County of Elgin have hereunto set
their corporate seals over the hands of their respective proper
officers duly authorized in that behalf.
ST. THOMAS SANITARY COLLECTION
SERVICE LIMITED
Per:
President
THE CORPORATION OF THE COUN1~ OF ELGIN
Per:
Warden
Per~
Clerk ..
The execution and delivery of
this Agreement has been
authorized by the County's
By-law No. passed the
day of , 1976.
SCHEDULE "A"
The Corporation of the Town of Aylmer
The Corporation of the Village of Belmont
The Corporation of the Village of Dutton
The Corporation of the Village of Port Burwell
The Corporation of the Village of Port Stanley
The Corporation of the Village of Rodney
The Corpo:ration of the Village of Springfield
The Corporation of the Village of Vienna
The Corpox"ation of the Village of West Lorne
The Corporation of the Township of Aldborough
The Corpot~ation of the Township of Bayham,
The Corporation of the Township of South Dorchester
The CorpoI~ation of the Township of Dunwich
The Corpo:t"ation of the Township of Malahide
The CorpoI~ation of the Township of Yarmouth
."
f'IlOI9'''.. ...1
..... ....... ....- t, "\ ...~:.l ;~.;:.::: I I
tl /II'" ~ ......#1
_..._n ......... ... "--J ,-}.~~
~"'~ ""\~ :-"~""t""'~,;:O~" ;.~~~:= _ _ ::~~~_~ ~_~= ~_ ~#~::_.:-::-:_~=-~~:.-::_:~:_= _ _ __
- ~:...\-_-~-...:...;~----~ - \ ~. ,~"",--~;;,-,,,,,--,J.-, - _~G ~
/ .On. ,)> t:I b: ; .. ,
~ ...,.p,." :_1
! ' ,,</ -@:l (/t-J ~ 9J ~
...,- .: . " \ ~ tJ
' , t/l;" \ \- . ~' .
'j Ji\z .:;; r I~ l.-_:il:--, c,...i~z'f~Qj\:\'~'#.-{"~~/1 /' l\
J I,. \ /: ll> ", :77/.\\0'J \.. ~L,~, O'~O<,~:"';':'.. I IJI
~. 'f l "f\\ ~:/, ~ % A /'.d'''':~f;~t~;~~'t.1lf:~~'-~%~~. . ~
~--"",:;s:,,,,,.~ "",- .,_~.~~~ A 1_:1Ie;~~i-~~Z;f'~~;'.~;::j ~.~ ~ ~
'-- r / ~ ~:/",/, ::r .-. "-~"F-~'~ 1..-'-'" ~'r/- n
.~ "" ~..:~:t:~,:~~\ 1r1 t' ~ VJj;~/;) /;t;-- -/h : ~ u "'- ____'"____
~ '_.-""~"n' V//////~p-r'~ \. (/ 1 \ ~,.,~~~~_~ c==="~'~l-==-'
-~~~~ ~ I J.1j \ 0 I - ;-;. -"-=.ll~_ . . ...-:u.oO
- " _m." ',. ,_ _._ ___, .. '"
''''''~ - ...,~ ,- 'G~_.-=-, ~.."'----~ - - i;l
"'tl'')~.~__ -=":;'~':<_~'=__ _~~__~ '<08: 00 _. =-~::n OOiocr.:> ..u-._ _ __0..
.. -~ ==- .... I
~.,
_......__ "."..0 'Mn.,_o
",~
.
MNO:l- tZ9ZZ'IZ S101
dIHSNNDl. 01OMHlOOS
.:IlIS IVSUd SIU
"011 3~NJ35 NOID3:mJ
.UJVJJNVS SVr40Hl15
."" .~ 153.1. llOS
SNVldV3t:fV {I 311$
,w, ..'
o
"'.JIG .....0 ...'"
~0l0" ~I_''''' 0'1"'_
a.o.... '1.'''' o~...
.-w...... ~
(~d..lu'....n ,~t..-...--.
. .'1...." ~......, ......~._._.
....._.'T~--:..~::~ ~
':;: :::.~~ l:=l
-- I ., c:::.;j)
.~ .;'''';.c; ~~=::l':=.=
--... .,. (:~)
ION3'i:>'3'
.""O'....,.~._ .""1~
OffI~"'\OII ~cn'l^'JQ "~t ~~J .~:~ "::~: .
lCltII~. "'1Q'ln'tdWO~ -~" ,u.~ 11"1 "Cl
.. . O."Q. ,"I 10 toO .,,.,.._ 0."" ..
....~ ""0_ ...0........ . .~_1I
.. __ Ql .:>t~..".. 0"0'" ..
'-_J 0__._" ,00 " ~ ltD. '\"'1_ ~
'~M:> I......' CJNr "I~ .01_ H. 0""'.01 .nou
. ......v ~GI'tIO yo '" ....." ~ 0'-''' .. 01 .'f1. QN(';IJf 1
.. ,,,..., jt' ."'4H'?'J ~IA \ Jr,'WfW ..1~.. ...,)
- " w'"' ~,.... Ct ,', ~......., J~'~
I"~"'- ... crK ~rO!l!
-''I'"$.~.Jd ..,....,.. iJ'fIV'"l.l
~~...," ~'1.n"T1Ql ., 0,1 ....~~.~~L~"'.;~.r~::4::--: .
... '....... OQ....IJ\~. ~.:~.:: ~= ~:,_ .:>'<..~ ~~~~::~ ~
.... .......-. ......." ....lI""o..l"-n ..,. y. t<OH ')~ "'? ... ~ ::> _" ....
0,"," W'i Tl_" ';:~:;:""" .......,...... ,"0" ",:: :::.=. .0 .....,.......::> ..
'::,2;! 7.~F~~T~ ~L~:f~,i-i~~E..l
Il'S n ct
\lo;;n..
::.
....( . .1
'f...J:..~
'lIt
ON <::> '::>
12
lOl
-f
en
CJ
::r=
t:tj
t:1
c:::
t-t
tTj
:
n
JI!
. NO'
" J/
.7'
/'
'. SCWE1)U1..E "D t1
\
\
\ /1.11 and Singular tbe cet:tain pat:cel or tt:act of land and pre~ises
\
sithate. lying and being in tbe TolNtlsbip of soutb~old, in tbe county
of "Elgin, and being composed of:
FiRSTLY tbe Not:tb balf of Lot 21. in tbe Thit:d conc~ssion
of tbe To~sbiP of soutb~old. e~cept that pa~t e~p~op~iated
by tbe Depat:tment of Higb~aYs by Plan Nu1!\ber D 286.
SECONDLY tbe Nortb~~est balf of Lot 22 in tbe third concession
of tbe To~sbiP of soutb~old compt:ising of 100 acres more ot:
leSs eJtcept tbat part taken for road put:poses by the
1)epat:tment of l\igb~aYs.
11l1R1>LY tbat part of Lot No. 23 in tbe third concession of 'tbe
said TownshiP of soutb~old desct:ibed as follows ~ coMMENCING
at tbe Not:tb~east corner of tbe said Lot; thence soutb
450 East along its Eastet:1Y limit 964.92 feet; thence ~est
450 soutb 1.980 feet more or lesS to tbe ~est limit of
said Lot; thence No~tb 450 ~est. 1888.26 feet more or lesS
to tbe NortberlY li:lnit of said Lot produced; Thence East
'].00 Nortb along tbe Nortbet:1Y limit of said Lot to tbe
plaOe of beginning; E~cept tbat portion oftbe above
described land out oH by tbe road allo~anoe bet~een concession
2. and 3 in tbe said ':townsbiP of soutbWO:\.d.
4~
.- ~
.'':' .I ,. "
", ,/"
/ .\
.
,
SCHEDULE "E"
THIS CONTRACT made this
day of
, 19
BET WEE N:
THE COPORATION OF THE
OF , (hereinafter the
"Local Municipality"),
OF THE FIRST PART, ,
... and -
STt THO~AS SANITARY COLLECTION
SERVICE LIMITED, (hereinafter the
"Owner"),
OF THE SECOND PART.
l~EREAS the Owner owns and operates a landfill~ng type of
waste disposal site on part of Lots 2l, 22 and 23, Concession 3,
in the Township of Southwold in the County of Elgin;
AND WHEREAS the Owner has given to certain Local Municipalities
in the County of Elgin, of which the Local Municipality i.s one, the
right to use the said vlaste disposal site in accordance with the
te.L1US and conditions of a certain Agreement (hereinafter referred to
o /0'/ /0' ) _ .00/::
as the "AgreementU), dated th,e/_1_~,~, day ~~June,) 1976 and made
~ ___....0 ':0_ _ ___-'-.-
between the O~er and The Corporation of the County of Elgin fo~
and on behalf: of and for the benefit of those Local Municipalities
in the County' of Elgin more particularly set out in the Agreement;
&~D vffiEREAS the Local Municipality desires the use of the said
waste disposal site on such te.L1US and conditions and has executed
and delivered this Contract pursuant to the Agreement;
NOW THE:REFORE THIS CONTRACT WITNESSETH that the Local Munici-
pality covenalnts and agrees with the Owner as follo~Y's:'
1,
In this Contract all 'tvords and phrases defined in the
Agreement shall have the same meaning and intent as
2~
therein set out as if incorporated into and repeated in,
this Contract;
Pursuant to the Agreement, the Local Municipality hereby
agrees to dispose, _~.f a11: ,of its Municipal Was te at the
0'0
Si.te for a teL"ll of"
months, couwlencing on the first
d~lY of
, 19 , and ending on the last day of
3.
, 19
During the said term the Local l!unicipality shall pay an
Annual Per
Charge in accordance with the
5.
. . b 'b half contained in tbe h~reement -~,.~_.
pro'l7is:\.ons :\.n t at e .
f tbe Local 1:'\unicipalitY sba.~
in default tbet:eo ,
.c-- . tb or 1>at:t tbet:eof on
. ~ t t tbe t:ate of 1"/. 1>er moP J,.. --------/----..
1. n teJ: eS a --". c-- ---------------------
.~. ------------ --
.______. . d d
. t. if deman e ·
o'l7erdue acCo~!---.J.-~- · ·
._~_ l:J b' contract tbe Local 1:'\un1.c:\.1>al-
'tbroughOut tbe term 01- t :\.s
b 't . t ~ill 'be bound bY all of tbe teJ:11lS and.
itY agt:ees t a :\.
conditions set out in tbe /l.gt:ee11lent.
't"ted ...ut:suant
. . . 'cation required or 1>et:m:\... "
/l.ny not1.ce or co~un:\. . .
th' contract to tbe 'Local Municipal-
to tbe l\gt:eement or :\.s .
d d to -be well and sufficiently ~iven or
ity sball be eeme .
h Cler'k of tbe Local 1:'\unici.1>alitY
served if banded to t e ·
. .1' t b" ...t:epaid. t:e~1.ste't'-
ot: if ma.iled to tbe Local 1:'\un:\.c:\.pa :\. Y J r
-ed. 1>ost addressed to it at:
.... 2 ....
4.
6.
tb benefit of tbe ~e1:
This cont-ract sball enu-re to e .' ·
, title to tbe site and. sball be
and itS scucess01:8 l.n . . .
i' litY and. itS succesS01:s.
binding u-pon tbe 'Local 1:'\U1\ C1.-pa
. . ' l' . baS beJ:euntO affi7lted
IN Vll'tNESS ~ER&O~ tbe 1..oca1. 1:'\un:\.c:\.pa :\.tY
bands of itS -pro-per officet:s du1.Y
itS cot:pot:ate sea1. ovet: tbe
. autbOrized in tbat bebalf,
desi.gna.te, bY
be dee1\\ed to bave been
to bave been effected on tbe
address as tbe Local ~unicipalitY may
" a if mailed, notice sball
wt:itten not1.ce. an.
~iven and service ~illbe dee1\\ed
fout:tb business daY aftet:
oT such otnet:
11\ai1.ing.
, Tl:1E Co'R?ORf'.'ItOl'l O~ 'I\1.'E
.Oi
r et: :
~
------
, -p~-r ~
.----:---
c"te't\t
The e~eeution and deliverY
of thiS contt:act baS been
autbOt:ized bY tbe 'Local
Muni ci.l?ali t1' s By-l~'iI No.
-passed th]..s
~^~ of · 19
............
.---
stC't\OM
.t'
t.~
___ .",..,. 1
~.: i -.
~..... ~
'\... ... ,..."..... -
t",EJ.Ko\ft ot'fJ.L
.- .
,\....01" 2\
':
~
Q)
~
~
Q)
~
f/}.
.-
. - ------:;:::::::.--::::
~ - . .......-_. ." .
I
....
CON.
I'\\G"''''''"(
~
.
\11
~t
~.
~c
:'~.~::~;'!t
...
-,..-
-""-
..
~
t LO'- . 2."3
.
t>>'1\f\t, .,,-
..,.. ,. ll4J c.~f1li$'"
",tl" 10'"
\,AlOctlllt' e.\Wct'- ~
,.uO" c..'."
tJi""" ,..,.lIft
OIf,c,\llll .. .,.
. 1""
"lid tl'''''- .. "'..c~. TI~
"'1'C\'tO" to\letH'" TI" t,..~4'
poln' E'....I\..
,'" "'..c"." e.\\~\OIt "lU' .
"0"'" a.""" .. lI"''- 1-ei:.>',;$
0'1,0.,0\ !.".
. ",Ot
. .,..
----
---
...tC'f\O~'
.~..-& I
...
..
..
No.
cotrrl
tl\AP
aO'T'TOM
51. 1t\OM~S SAN\'t
.cOt.t.E~
O. "'...- C:.~ .-.
".,OOll .."ell Il~.0U"4
":~~:l:'.
(~.If.., - C <'-
;;4
DATED this 1st day o~ June, 1976.
BET WEE N:
ST~ THOMAS SANI~AR1 COLLECTION
SERVICE LII--iI'rED~ (hereina;J;ter,
the "Owner")
OF THE FJ:R.ST PART,
~ and ~
.THE CORPORATION~OF T~~~, GO~bXuQ.f
ELGIN. (hereinafter referred to as
,'"the "CountyH) for and OIl behal~
and for the benefit of th0se'
LOCAL MUNICIPALITIES in.' tlieCOUNTY
OF ELGIN, more particulary described
,Schedule "At' hereto, (hereinafter
re~erred to sepa.;x:ate1y as a "Loca1
Mun:i,cipality" and together ~eferred
to as the "Local Mun:i,cipal:lties~~) 1
OF THE SECOND PART.
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
WR,IGHT AND ASSOCIATES
612.~ 3 83 R:f.. chmond St.,
LONDON, Ontario,
N6A 3.C4
(>
'P'
DATED this
day.of
) 19
BET WEE N:
THE CORPORATION. OF THE
OF (hereinafter the
"Local Municipality")
OF THE FIRST PART t .
- and -
ST. THOMAS SANITARY COLLECTION
SERVICE LIMITED, (here.inafter the
"Owner") ,
OF THE SECOND PART,
WASTE DISPOSAL CONTRACT
,.
I;
ST. THOMAS, ONTARIO.
MAY 12, 1976.
PAGE 1.
THE COUNTY OF ELGIN ROAD COMMITTEE MET at the Municipal ~lilding
on May 12 at 10:00 A.M. with all members except Reeves Wilson and Caverly
in attendance. Also Frank Clarke in attendance and Ray Collard of the County
Road Departmemt.
TENDERS FOR HOT MIX ASPHALT PAVING were opened and were as a~tached.
TENDERS FOR SALE OF LOTS in Lot 7, Concession V, Southwold were
opened and were as follows:
Parcel A - Hugo and Donna Keusch $ 12,050.00
J. Lucas
$ 3,000.00
$ 3,600.00
R. E. Atcheson
Parcel B - R. E. Atcheson
$ 6,300.00
$ 3,000.00
J. Lucas
"MOVED BY: L. R. CARROLL
SECONDED BY: M. A. SCHAFER
THAT WE ACCEPT THE TENDER OF HUGO KEUSCH AT $ 12,050 FOR PARTS
# 1 & 2 REFERENCE PLAN llR-967 AND RECOMMEND TO COUNTY COUNCIL
THAT A BY-LAW BE PASSED AUTHORIZING THE WARDEN AND CLERK TO
SIGN A DEED FOR THE PROPERTY TO HUGO AND DONNA KEUSCH.
CARRIED."
"MOVED BY: S. J. GLOVER
SECONDED BY: G. D. SIMPSON
THAT WE ACCEPT THE TENDER OF R. E. ATCHESON AT $ 6,300 FOR PARTS
#14 & 15 REFERENCE PLAN llR-967 AND RECOMMEND TO COUNTY COUNCIL
TllAT A BY-LAW BE PASSED AUTHORIZING THE WARDEN AND CLERK, TO SIGN
A DEED FOR THE PROPERTY TO R. E. ATCHESON.
CARRIED."
ST. THOMAS, ONTARIO.
MAY 12, 1976.
P AG E 2.
THE MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF APRIL 15 were read and approved.
THE ENGINEER REPORTED ON THE WORK TO DATE as follows:
(1) Work was underway in Dutton on curb and gutter on Road 8.
(2) Trim work on Road 20 in Port Stanley had been completed and sodding
was underway on Bostwick and Hetty Streets for the Village of Port
Stanley..
(3) Most of the trees and limbs had been cleaned out of the culvert at
Richmond on Road 38.
(4) Culverts were being placed on Road 45 at Road 36 to relieve the flooding
encountered in 1975.
(5) Fencing was in progress on Road 30.
(6) Gravel Resurfacing had been completed on Road 28 and was underway on
Road 43..
(7) Application of Calcium Chloride was underway.
(8) The new Truck, Dozer and Loader had been received.
(9) Spring sign maintenance had been completed.
(10) Pavement Marking would start as soon as the paint W'aS received.
(11) It was expected that Maintenance Expenditures would be $ 30,000 to
$ 40,000 over the estimates.
(12) A Soils Report from Golder Associates for the Kettle Creek crossing was
expected shortly and the Ministry of Transportation and Communications had
approved preliminary plans.
(13) 4 acres of the Whitney property had been rented to Ron Jones @ $ 35 per
acre and a Deed for the property was expected shortly.
(14) The Needs Study Update had been completed and forwarded to the Ministry
of Transportation and Communications.
(15) Mac McLaws had completed crushing at the Pleasant Valley Pit for the time
being. More stripping would be done when the ground dried out.
ST. THOMAS, ONTARIO.
MAY 12, 1976.
PAGE 3.
(16) Operator Postings had been made as follows:
Truck Driver
Ken Telfer
Bulldozer Operator
Orrie Ostrander
Loader Operator
Ted Kelley
SWleeper' Operator
Lewis Small.
(17) 5 members of the County Road Department had attended the Ontario Good
Roads School at Guelph and Ray Collard had instructed in surveying.
SOLID WASTE CONTROL WAS REPORTED as follows:
(1) That the London Area Solid Waste Study had been accepted by the Steering
Connnittlee and the final report would be forthcoming shortly.
(2) That Murray Hennessey had been with Mr. A. Wright, Solicitor of the
St. Thomas Sanitary Collection Services Limited and a second d.raft
agreement would be available for study shortly.
MOSQUITO ABATEMENT WAS REPORTED on as follows:
(1) Ray Collard and Gary Gordon had attended the Ministry of the Environment's
instruction course on Mosquito Extermination.
(2) Maps for the Kettle Creek Conservation Authority and the Catfish Creek
Conservation Authority watersheds were reasonably good, but left considerable
to be desired for the rest of the County.
THE ENGINEER SHOWED THE PICTURES he had taken in inspection of East
Elgin and Haldimand Norfolk of erosion problems and the Warden agreed to
report to County Council.
CORRESPONDENCE FROM J. WISE, Member of Parliament, on the cleaning
out of the Port Burwell Harbour was read and the Engineer reported that no
soil tests had as yet been taken of the Harbour as the Department of Public
Works were looking for an other Soils Consultant other than Golder Associates
to take soil samples. This matter also would be brought to the attention of
Council by the Warden.
ST. THOMAS, ONTARIO.
MAY 12, 1976.
PAGE 4.
"MOVED BY: M. A. SCHAFER
SECONDED BY: L. R. CARROLL
THAT TENDERS FOR THE FOLLOWING CONTRACTS FOR ASPHALT PAVING BE
ACCEPTED AS FOLLOWS SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF THE MINISTRY OF
TRANSPORTATION AND COMMUNICATIONS.
CONTRACT "A" (WEST LORNE AND ROAD 8 & 13 IN DUTTON) TO
W:ALMSLEY BROS. LTD. AT $ 31,164.
CONTRACT "B" ROAD 20 IN PORT STANLEY TO
WALMSLEY BROS. LTD. AT $ 5,816.25
CONTRACT "C" ROAD 34 IN BELMONT AND YARMOUTH-WESTMINSTER TOWNLINE TO
WALMSLEY BROS. LTD. AT $ 20,982.
CONTRACT "D" ROAD 30 & 52 TO
WALMSLEY BROS. LTD. AT $ 23,895.
CONTRACT "E" ROADS 39 & 42 TO
WALMSLEY BROS. LTD. AT $ 25,798.75
CONTRACT "F" ROAD 45 TO
WALMSLEY BROS. LTD. AT $ 77,233.50
CONTRACT "G" ROAD 46 TO
WALMSLEY BROS. LTD. AT $ 21,450.
CARRIED."
THE MEETING ADJOURNED FOR DINNER.
AFTER DINNER - Reeve Wilson in attendance.
IT WAS DECIDED TO POSTPONE East Elgin Road Inspection to at least
late June.
ST. THOMAS, ONTARIO,
MAY 12, 1976.
PAGE 5.
, 'MOVED BY: G. W. MONTEITH
SECONDED BY: M. A. SCHAFER
THAT THE FOLLOWING PAYLISTS BE APPROVED FOR PAYMENT:
PAYLIST # 19 AMOUNTING TO
PAYLIST # 20 AMOUNTING TO
PAYLIST # 21 AMOUNTING TO
PAYLIST # 22 AMOUNTING TO
PAYLIST # 23 AMOUNTING TO
$ 30,236.67
$ 418.61
$ 29,388.32
$ 332.25
$ 113,122.15
CARRIED."
CORRESPONDENCE WAS READ from the Ontario Municipal Board setting a
hearing date for an appeal dealing with Lot 22, Concession IX, Dunwich.
THE ENGINEER REPORTED that he understood that some supplementary
By-Law money might be available for Drainage Assessments on County Roads and
recommended that an application to the Ministry of Transportation and
Communications to cover the likely assessments be made.
"MOVED BY: G. W. MONTEITH
SECONDED BY: S. J. GLOVER
THAT WE RECOMMEND TO COUNTY COUNCIL THAT A RESOLUTION BE PASSED
REQUESTING THE MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION AND COMMUNICATIONS TO
APPROPRIATE THE SUM OF $ 18,000 IN SUBSIDY MONEY FOR DRAINAGE
ASSESSMENTS ON COUNTY ROADS IN 1976.
CARRIED."
1tMOVED BY: S. J. GLOVER
SECONDED BY: G. D. S[MRSON
THAT WE RECOMMEND TO COUNTY COUNCIL THAT THE COUNTY' S SHARE
($18,000) FOR DRAINAGE ASSESSMENT PROGRAMME TO BE TAKEN FROM THE
COUNTY'S CONTINGENCY FUND.
CARRIED.11
IT WAS DECIDED THAT THE RODNEY CEMETERY BOARD should be given a choice
between havi.ng steps placed on the walk at the east line of their property,
..'J\/ .
cI-, ~ moving and replacing the fence if the County continued the walk further to the
4
west on County Road 4.
ST. THOMAS, ONTAR10.
MAY. 12, 19.,6.
PAGE 6.
(1) Minist~y of Transportation and communicatiOns approval had been received
Tl1.E ENGINEER REPORTED THt\T ~
(2) TestS ~ould be made of the concrete in the piers of the MiddlemisS
for replacement of the Wardsville Bridge bearingS.
(3) No soils ReportS had been receiVed on the Walker Bridge as yet.
Bridge.
IT WAS DECIDED THt\T Ekfrid To~shiP should be notified of the erosion
of their approach road at the TateS Bridge and of the thoughtS of the Lo~er
Thgmes ValleY Conservation Authority for erosion protection.
other side of a County Road ~aS discUssed at some length.
THE COUNT'i'S POLleY ON EXTENSION of drains frOtll one side to the
"MOVED BY.:
L. R. CARROLL
SECONDED BY: M. A. SCHt\FER
TltAT WE WILL PLACE A DRAIN ACROSS A coUNT'i ROAD AS AN OUTLET
FOR PRIVATE PROPERT'i 11' THE REQUESTING LAND OWNER PAYS 50% 01'
Tl1.E COST. THE OWNER TO PROVIDE A CERTIFIED CREQUE 01' 66% OF Tl1.E
ESTlMA1$D COST 01' THE CROSSING PRIOR TO ANY WORK BEING DONE. N'lY
DIFFERENCE TO BE RE1'\JNDED AFTER THE WORK IS COMPLETED.
THE ENGINEER REPORTED THt\T N'l APPRAISAL had been made on the Bucke
CARR lED ."
property on Road 30 and he ~aS hopeful of obtaining the property at the
appraised value pluS legal costs.
T11E ENGINEER PRESENTED TltE ATTACHED PROPOSALS for Truck Rates for
1976.
"MOVED BY: G. W. MONTEl TIl
SECONDED BY: S. J. GLOVER
THt\T ']1lE RATES FOR 1:11RED TRUCKING AS PROPOSED BY TIlE ENGINEER N'lD
ATTACltED BE ACCEPTED FOR TltE PERIOD MAY 1. 1976 to MAY 1. 1977.
CARR1ED ."
ST. THOMAS, ONTARIO.
MAY 12, 1976.
PAGE 7.
"MOVED BY: M. A. SCHAFER
SECONDED BY: L. R. CARROLL
THAT WE ACCEPT THE QUOTATION OF VALLEY BLADES LTD. FOR 400
GRADER BLADES DELIVERED TO THE COUNTY GARAGE AT THE PRICE OF
~; 13.15 FEDERAL SALES TAX INCLUDED. PROVINCIAL SALES TAX EXTRA
SUBJECT TO MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION AND COMMUNICATIONS'
APPROVAL.
CARRIED."
THE ENGINEER SUGGESTED that tenders be called to replace Grader #11
as soon as possible so that delivery would be made prior to Fall grading and
Snow Plowing.
"MOVED BY: G. W. MONTEITH
SECONDED BY: G. D. SIMPSON
THAT THE ENGINEER BE ENPOWERED TO CALL TENDERS FOR A GRADER AND
ONE WAY SNOW PLOW AND HARNESS WITH GRADER #11 AS A TRADE IN
(1959 ADAMS).
CARRIED ."
THE ENGINEER REPORTED at long last the Land Plan at Port Talbot
had been cVll~leted and registered and that the transfer of property to
Port Talbot Farms Ltd. could be cUUlfJleted.
"MOVED BY: S. J. GLOVER
SECONDED BY: G. D. SIMPSON
THAT WE RECOMMEND TO COUNTY COUNCIL THAT A BY-LAW BE PASSED
AUTHORIZING THE WARDEN AND CLERK TO SIGN A DEED FOR PARTS 3 & 4,
REGISTERED PLAN Dl123 TO PORT TALBOT FARMS LTD.
CARRIED."
"MOVED BY:
L. R. CARROLL
ST. THOMAS, ONTARIO.
MAY 12, 1976.
PAGE 8.
SECONDED BY: M. A. SCHAFER
,<"I~
THAT WE ADJOURN TO JUNE 9 AT 10 :00 A.M.
CARRIED."
(! ,#\Jj/
ljA' /i.!~.!
CHAIRMAN
I
,'1%
COUNTY OF ELGIN ROAD COMMITTEE REPORT
FIRST REPORT
St. Thomas, Ontario,
May Session
1976
TO THE WARDEN AND MEMBERS OF ELGIN COUNTY COUNCIL:
YOUR ROAD COMMITTEE REPORTS AS FOLLOWS:
1. Tenders for Hot Mix Asphalt Paving have been let to Walmsley Bros.
Ltd., of London as follows:
(a) Contract "A" West Lorne and Road 8 & 13 in Dutton at $ 31,164.
(Subject to approval of the Village of West Lorne for work in
West Lorne.)
(b) Contract "BH Road 20 in Port Stanley at $ 5,816.25.
(c) Contract "C" Road 34 in Belmont and on the Yarmouth-Westminster
Townline at $ 20,982.
(d) Contract ,,~, Road 30 and 52 in Yarmouth Township at $ 23,895.
(e) Contract "Elf Road 39 in Port Burwell and part of Road 42 in
Malahide Township at $ 25,798.75.
(f) Contract "F" Road 45 from Road 36 to Jaffa and from Highway 4
to Centennial Ave. (Road 28) at $ 77,233.50.
(g) Contract "G' Road 46 north of Corinth ~n Bayham Township at
$ 21,450.
Walmsley Bros. Ltd. bids were the lowest of three bids received. In
addition to the bid price the County of Elgin will supply the Asphalt
Cement for all the Contracts.
Some of the work in Contract "A" and "B"will be charged to the Ministry
of the Environment and the County of Middlesex will pay a portion of
Contract "C".
2. That Tenders have been called for a new Grader with the County's
1959 Adams as a trade in.
... continued ...
COUNTY OF ELGIN. ROAD GOl1MITTEE REPORT
~
FIRST REPORT
May Session 1976
Page 2
TO THE WARDEN AND MEMBERS OF THE ELGIN COUNTY COUNCIL:
WE RECOMMEND:
(1) That a Resolution be passed requesting the Ministry of Transportation
and Cvur.municationsto appropriate the sum of $ 18,000 in Subsidy money
for Drainage Assessments on County Roads in 1976. We have learned
that some subsidy money may be available for Drainage Assessments.
Subsidy on Drainage Assessemnts under this Supplementary Progrcu:nm,e
is at 50'%.
(2) That the County's share ($ 18,000) of the cost of the Drainage
Asse.ssments be taken from the County's Contingency ]~nd.
(3) That a By-Law be passed authorizing the Warden and Clerk to sign a
Deed, de1eding to Port Talbot Farms Ltd. a portion of Lot A Concession
XI, Dunwich shown as parts 3 & 4 on Registered Plan 01123. Thjls
property, approximately 1.28 acres, is in return for property required
by the County of Elgin for widening County Road 16 at Talbot Creek
several years ago.
(4) That a By-Law be passed authorizing the Warden and Clerk to sign a
Deed, deeding to Hugo and Donna Keusch a portion of Lot 7 ConcE~ssion
V, Southwold shown as parts 1 & 2 on Reference Plan llR-967 (9-rea
approximately 1.8 acres).
The land near County Road 20 was not needed for road allowance
purpose. Mr. Keusch's bid at$ 12,050 was the highest of 3 received.
(5) That a By-Law be passed authorizing the Warden and Clerk to sign a
I
Deed, deeding to Elfriede Atcheson a portion of Lot 7 Concession V,
Southwold shown as parts 14 & 15 On Reference Plan llR-967 (area
approximately 1.,'V acres). Elfriede Atcheson's bid at $ 6,300 was the
highest of 2 received.
All of Which Is Respectfully Submitted.
CHAIRMAN
lJ
COUNTY OF ELGIN ROAD COMMITTEE REPORT
SECOND REPORT
St. Thomas, Ontario,
May Session
1976
TO THE WARDEN AND MEMBERS OF ELGIN COUNTY COUNCIL:
YOUR ROAD COMMITTEE REPORTS AS FOLLOWS:
1. The Steering CUUlluittee for the London Area Sol id Waste Study has
accepted the Report of Jam~s F. MacLaren Ltd. on the Middlesex ...
Elgin Area Solid Waste Management Study. Printing ()f the Repol:'t
is underway and distribution to County Council Members will follow.
2. The Special CVUlluittee of Road CVUlluittee is continuing negotiat:lons
with the St. Thomas Sanitary Collection Services Ltd. with regard
to a disposal price at their proposed Southwold Site.
All Of Which Is Respectfully Sumnitted.
CHAIRMAN
COUNTY OF ELGIN ROAD COMMITTEE REPORT
THIRD REPORT
St. ThOID&S, Ontario,
May Session
1976
TO THE WARDEN AND MEMBERS OF ELGIN COUNTY COUNCIL:
YO~t COMMITTEE REPORTS AS FOLLOWS:
1. That the County of Elgin has applied for a licence from the Ministry
of the Environment as an operator to carry out a Mosquito Abatement
Programme if necessary. The licence will be in the name of Ray
Collard of the County Road Department.
2. Applications to the Ministry of the Environment have been made to
have 5 menlbers of the County Road Department (1 regular bmployee and
4 summer students) licensed as exterminators under the Programme.
3. Assembly of maps is underway. Maps of the Kettle Creek and Catfish
Creek WatE!rsheds are available at a scale of one inch equal 400 feet.
Maps for the remainder of the County are available at a scale of
approximately one inch equal 1300 feet. These maps, while not as
useful as the larger scale maps, can be used if necessary.
All Of Which Is Respectfully Submitted.
CHAIRMAN
I?~, ~
N. B.
A.C. @ 5.8% R.L.8
@ 6.0% H.L.4
COUNTY OF ELGIN
SUMMARY OF HOT MIX TENDERS
r.
1976 CONTRACT
TOWLANDS (LONDON) 1970 LTD_.
,:;,~
"~~~
<.
-,..
May 13, 1976
L&M STRIPING CO. LTD.
WALMSLEY BRO.'S
ITEM TONS UNIT PRICE
CONTRACT "N'
Part 1 R.L. 4 350 12.85
West Lorne A.C. 21.0 68.50
Part 2
Dutton
CONTRACT "B"
Port Stanley
CONTRACT " a'
Borden Ave., Belmont
R.L. 8
R.L. 4
A.C.
225
2420
158.6
11.50
9.95
68.50
TOTAL CONTRACT "A"
R.L. 4
A.C.
495
29.1
11.75
68.50
TOTAL CONTRACT "B"
R.L. 8
R.L. 4
A.C.
1345
1345
158.71
7.80
7.80
68.50
TOTAL CONTRACT "C"
TENDER VALUE
UNIT PRICE
. .
UNIT PRICE
TENDER VALUE
$ 4,497.50
L,438.50
$ 5,936.00
$ 2,587.50
24,079.00
10,864.10
$ 37,530.60
13.09
66.75
$ 4,581.50
1 , 401 . 75,
$ 5,983.25
13.07
10.63
66.75
$ 2,940.75
25, 7 24. 60
10,586.55,
$ 39,251.90
$ 43,466.60
$ 45,235.15,
$ 5,816.25 12.35 $ 6 , 113 . 25
1,993.35 66.75 1.942.43
$ 7,809.60 $ 8,055.68
:
$ 10,491.00 8.62 $ 11,593.90
10,491.00 8.73 11,741.85
10,871.64 66.75 10,593.89,
$ 31,853.64 $ 33,929.6~
TENDER VALUE
COUNTY OF ELGIN
Page 2
f
SUMMARY OF HOT ~rrx TENDERS
1976 CONTRACT
WALMSLEY BRO.'S
TOWLANDS (LONDON) 1970 LTD.,
L&M STRIPING CO. LTD.
CONTRACT "D"
Road 30 and 52
ITEM TONS
R.L. 8 1050
R.L. 4 1900
A.C. 174.9
lJNIT PRICE
TENDER VALUE
UNIT PRICE
TENDER VALUE
UNIT PRICE
TENDER VALUE
8.10
8.10
68.50
$ 8,505.00
15,390.00
11,980.65
$ 35,875.65
9.28
9.39
66.75
$ 9,744.00
17,841.00
11,674.58,
$ 39,259.58.
TOTAL CONTRACT "D"
CONTRACT " E"
Part 1 Road 42 R.L. 8 350 8.55 $ 2,992.50 10. 27 $ 3,594.50
From Rwy. 73 to Road 40 R.L. 4 2375 8.55 20,306.25 10.32 24,510.00
A.C. 162.8 68.50 11,151,80 66.75 10,866.90.
$ 34,450.55 $ 38,971.40
Part 2 Road 39 R.L. 8 100 12.50 $ 1,250.00 13.47 $ 1,347.00
Port Burwell R.L. 4 100 12.50 1,250.00 13.58 1,358.00
A.C. 11.8 68.50 808.30 66.75 787.65
$ 3,308.30 $ 3,492.65
TOTAL CONTRACT " E" $ 37,758.85 $ 42,464.05
:
CONTRACT " F"
Part 1 Road 45 R..L. 8 1660 8.10 $ 13,446.00 9.47 $ 15,720.20
Road 36 to Jaffa R.L. 4 2275 8-.10 18,427.50 9.58 21,794.50
A.C. 23 2. 78 68.50 15,945.43 66.75 15,538.07
$ 47,818.93 $ 53,052.77
CONTRACT "P' (cont'd) Fwd.
Part 2 Road 45
H\~. 4 to Road 28
CONTRACT" C"
Road 46 - Corinth
To County Line
ITEM
H.L. 8
H. L. 4
A.C.
TONS
2825
2775
330.35
TOTAL CONTRACT "P'
H.L. 8
H.L. 4
A. C.
1375
1375
16 2. 25
TOTAL CONTRACT "C"
COUNTY OF ELGIN
SlJNlv1ARY OF HOT MIX TENDERS
1976 CONTRACT
WALMSLEY BRO.'S
UNIT PRICE
8.10
8.10
68.50
7.80
7.80
68.50
TENDER VALUE
$ 47,818.93
$ 22,882.50
22,477.50
22,628.98
$ 67,988.98
$ 115,807.91
Page 3
.TOWLAND (LONDON) 1970 LTD.
L&M STRIPING CO. LTD.
TENDER VALUE
UNIT PRICE
9.25
9.36
66.75
TENDER VALUE
UNIT PRICE
$ 10,725.00 10.11 $ 13,901.25 22.00 $ 30,250.00
10, 725.00 10.22 14,052.50 22.00 30,250.00
11,114.13 66.75 10;830.19 11.85 1,922.67
$ 32,564.13 $ 38,783.94 $ 62,422.67
$ 53,052.77
$ 26 , 131 . 25
25,974.00
22,050..86
$ 74,156.11
COUNTY OF ELGIN ROAD DEPARTMENT
I~,~IL~~
(0-'1 ~
~
,h
PROPOSAL FOR TRUCKING RATES FOR 1976 (EFFECTIVE MAY 1, 1976)
NOTE:
1975 rates were approximately 15% over 1974 and 1974
were approximately 15% over 1973.
Singl'e Axle
RATES PER HOUR
1973 1974 1975 Proposed 1976
7.60, 8.75 10.50 11.50
11.50 13.00 15.25 16.75
Tandem
TON MILE RATES
1973 1974 1975 Proposed 1976
Stockpile 22et 25et 29et 3 2et
Under 1 Mile 2Bet 32et 37et 41et
1 - 3 Miles 35~ 40et 46et Slet
4 Mile Average 43et 50ct 58ct 6l~ct
5 Mile Average 50ct 5Bct 67ct 7l..ct
6 Mile Average 57et 66et 76et B L~et
7 Mile Average 64et 74et 85et 93ct
8 Mile Average 70et Blet 93et 1.02
9 Mile Average 76<1- B8ct 1.01 l.ll
10 Mile Average 82ct 95ct 1.09 1.20
10 - 20 Miles 82ct plus 95ct plus 1.09 plus 1 . 20 pI us
6ct ton 6~<I- ton 7%.ct ton Bet ton
mile mile mile mile
Over 20 Miles 1.42 plus 1.60 plus 1.B4 plus 2.00 plus
Sct ton 5~ct ton 6ct ton 6%.ct ton
mile mile mile mile
11/
~
COUNTY OF ELGIN ROAD COMMITTEE REPORT
FIRST REPORT
t
St. Thomas, Ontario
April Session
1976
TO THE WARDEN AND MEMBERS OF ELGIN COUNTY COUNCIL.
YOUR ROAD COMMITTEE REPORTS AS FOLLOWS:
1. Tenders have been called for Asphalt Paving for the year and
include proposed construction as follows:
(a) Completion of work on Road 20 Carlow Road, Port Stanley.
(b) Completion of work on Road 8 and 13, Dutton.
(c) Road 34 (Borden Ave.) in Belmont.
(d) Road 30 and Road 52 - areas of new construction, Yarmouth
Township.
2. Tenders have been called for Asphalt Resurfacing on
(a) Road 15 in Dutton.
(b) Road 34 West of Bordon Ave., Elgin Middlesex County Line.
(Yart11louth Township)
(c) Road 46 from Corinth to Oxford County Line in Bayham Township.
(d) Road 42 from Highway 73 to Road 40 in Malahide Township.
(e) Road 45 from Road 36 to Road 35 and from Highway 4 to Road 28
in Yarmouth Township.
3. We have purchased the following new equipment:
(a) Ford LTS 8000 Tandem Truck to replace a truck scrapped last month.
The truck will be equipped with a Snow Plow which will give us
an additional Snow Plowing unit, making 10 units in all. However
an additional Sander truck will have to be rented for next season.
(b) John Deere JD350-C Bulldozer with the County's old John Deere 350
Bulldozer as a trade in.
(c) A Model JCB4l8 2 cubic yard Front End Loader with the County's
old Michigan Loader as a trade in.
All Of Which Is Respectfully Submi.tted.
CHAIRMAN
COUNTY OF ELGIN ROAD COMMITTEE
,
I
,1
SPRING INSPECTION - April 28, 1976
1.
Leave the Court House at 9:00 A.M.
2.
Road 30 - complete 1975 work
- Replacement of Salt Creek Culvert
- Bucke Property.
3. Road 52 - Top Coat Paving of 1975 work
- Relocation of Road 52
- Culvert location
- Ferguson property.
4. Road 52 to Talbotville
- Road 26 to Talbotville - Assumption by M.T.C.?
5. Westminst€~r - Southwold - Delaware Townline to St. Thomas Sanitary
Collection Services Ltd. proposed Waste Disposal Site.
6. Township Road to Road 19.
7. Road 19 to Highway 3 - poor condition.
8. Highway 3 to Shedden - Road 20 - Lots for Sale on Road 20 north.
9. To Road 14 and Middlemiss Bridge.
10. Inspection of Middlemiss Bridge.
11. Road 9 to Campbelton - Tates Bridge.
12. Dinner.
13. Inspect Walker Bridge.
14. Inspect Wardsville Bridge.
15. Road 3 to Rodney - Fencing, Guide Rail, Trim, etc.
16. Road 2 to Dutton - poor condition - Dunwich Aldborough Townline c~asterly.
Rodney Cemetery Fence.
17. Completion of work in Dutton - Road 8 and 13.
- Resurfacing on Road 15 - Brown Drain - County Assessment.
- Lnts' fox 'Sale...:
18. Road 8 to Road 16.
19. Road 16 to Road 14 - needs resurfacing.
20. Road 16 to Fingal needs ;J::e'cQl~.$ta;;uc:!=ion.
21. Middlemarch - Futcher Drain $ 7500 County Assessment.
22. Road 45 to Highway 4 (former Siple property for sale?)
23. Road 45 - Highway 4 to Road 28 - Resurfacing.
24. Proposed Gravel Pit Intersection Road 22 and 45 by Northside Farming
Ltd. (J. Everitt and Maurice Beaudry).
25. Road 28 - Centennial Ave. - assumed by the County between Road 45 and
Elm Street in January / 76.
COUNTY OF ELGIN ROAD COMMITTEE REPORT
SECOND REPORT
St.. Thomas, Ontario,
April Sessi.on
1976
TO THE WARDEN AND MEMBERS OF ELGIN COUNTY COUNCIL.
YOUR COMMITTEE REPORTS AS FOLLOWS:
At the request of Warden Schafer, the County Road Committee
has made enquiries into the programme proposed by the Ministry of the
Environment and the Ministry of Health to eliminate mosquitoes which
might be carrying "St. Louis" strain of encephalitis. The meetings
were also attended by Mr. Jack Elley of the Elgin - St. Thomas Health
Unit and representatives from the Ministry of the Enviror~ent.
WE RECOMMEND
1. That some County personnel be licensed by the Ministry of the
Environment for a Mosquito Abatement Programme.
2. That the Elgin - St. Thomas Health Unit purchase a ton of Abate II
for the use of the County and the City. (A 50% subsidy for materials
is available through the Health Unit.)
All Of Which Is Respectfully Submi.tted.
CHAIRMAN
\~
ST. T1:l0MA8, ONTARIO,
APRIL 15, 1976.
PAGE 1.
on April 15 at 10:00 A.M. All members except Warden schafer, Reeve cook
THE cOUNTY OF ELGIN ROAD COMMlTTEE MET at the MUnicipal Building
and Reeve Wilson in attendance.
"MOVED BY: G. W. MONTEITH
SECONDED BY: W. R. CAvERLY
THAT LORNE CARROLL BE C1lAIRMAN PRO TEfiM.
CARRIED"
THE MINUTES OF THE MEETING of March 31 were read and approved.
THE ENGINEER REPORTED ON THE WORK to date stating:
1. sweeping waS underway with all curbs and gutters having been swept once.
2. Repairs to pavements were continUing.
3. All brush from the ice stOrm had been picked up except for some gravel
4. Repairs to equipment were continuing to be heaVY with wheel bearings on
roads.
most Snow plowS and Sander Trucks having to be replaced. The motor on
Grader #15 also would have to be overhauled.
5. Repairs to drains were continuing.
6. MaC McLaWS waS continuing gravel crushing at pleasant Valley. It was
necessary to remove some of the overburden with trucks. It also had been
necessary to use a bulldozer to mix the gravel.
APproximatelY~OO cubic yards of gravel had been removed from Harley
Babcock's property and mixed with the other gravel being crushed.
7. constructiOn work would start shortly - fencing and guide rail work on
8. some of the county'S personnel would attend the Ontario Good Roads ASsociation
Road 3 would start on Monday.
Road School at the University of GUelph from MaY 3 to 5.
ST. THOMAS, ONTARIO,
APRIL 15, 1976.
PAGE 2.
9. It would be necessary to post for a truck driver and a bulldozer
"
operator ..
"MOVED BY: S. J. GLOVER
SECONDED BY: G. D. SIMPSON
THAT THE FOLLOWlNG pA'lLISTS BE APPROVED FOR PAYMENT
pAYLIST # 14 AMOUNTING TO $
PA'lLIST # 15 AMOUNTING TO $
pA'lLIST # 16 AMOUNTING TO $
l' A'lLI ST # 1 7 AMOUNTING TO $
pA'lLIST # 18 AM.QUNTlNG TO $
29,470.00
28,045.44
28,969.43
585.21
43,364.95
CARRIED"
(1) Ontario Municipal Board setting a hearing date for an appeal by crace
CORRESPONDENCE WAS READ FROM
Anderson on a decision by the Township of yarmouth committee of
(2) JameS F. MacLaren with a copy of a letter to the Lower Thames Valley
AdjUstment.
(3) Ministry of Transportation and communications with approval for
conservation Authority regarding erosion at Tates Bridge.
aSSU!1lptiOn of a portion of Road 30 by the St. Thomas Suburban Road
Commission.
T1:l.E ENGINEER REPORTED THAT THE ESTATE of Florence Bucke waS having
her property on Road 30 appraised and that the County would have first chance
to purcha se ,the property.
REEVE COOK IN ATTENDANCE and aSSU!1led the Chair.
"J1OVED BY: L. R. CABROLL
SECONDED Fl: G. W. MONTEITH
THAT WE ACCEPT TflE QUOTATION OF FLEX_O_LITE FOR GLASS BEADS @ 11.9
CENTS pER LB. INCLUDING FEDERAL SALES TAX, SUBJECT TO T1:l.E mmSTRY
OF TRAN SPORTATI ON AND COMMUNI CATIONS' APpROV AL.
CARR1 ED"
ST. THOMAS, ONTARIO,
APRIL 15, 1976.
PAGE 3.
"MOVED BY: G. D. SIMPSON
SECONDED BY: S. J. GLOVER
THAT WE ACCEPT THE QUOTATION OF IBIS PRODUCTS LTD. FOR
AI)PROXlMATELY 3375 GALLONS OF YELLOW TRAFFIC PAINT AT THEIR
QUOTED PRICE OF $ 3.57 PER GALLON SUBJECT TO MINISTRY OF
TE~SPORTATION AND COMMUNICATIONS' APPROVAL.
CARRIED"
"MOVED BY: G. W. MONTEITH
SECONDED BY: G. D. SIMPSON
THAT WE ACCEPT THE QUOTATION OF 3M CANADA LTD. FOR A 3M
VQCIII PHOTOCOPIER AT THEIR QUOTED PRICE OF $ 1725.00 PLUS
TF~DE OF THE COUNTY'S OLD COPIER SUBJECT TO MINISTRY OF
TFurnSPORTATION AND COMMUNICATIONS' APPROVAL.
CARRIED"
"MC)VED BY: G. W. MONTEITH
SECONDED BY: G. D. SIMPSON
THAT WE ACCEPT THE QUOTATION OF ELGIN BUSINESS MACHINES LTD.
FOR AN OLIVETTI EDITOR #4C ELECTRIC TYPEWRITER AT THEIR QUOTED
PEnCE OF $ 720.32 INCLUDING PROVINCIAL SALES TAX, SUBJECT TO
MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION AND COMMUNICATIONS' APPROVAL.
CARRIED"
THE ENGINEER PRESENTED TENDERS AND QUOTATIONS for equipment and
his evaluation of them. He also explained that Mr. Art Gordon had examined
both the John Deere and the Massey Ferguson Bulldozers and found that the
John Deere was a much better machine than the Massey Ferguson.
ST. THOMAS, ONTARIO,
APRIL 15, 1976.
PAGE 4.
"MOVED BY: L. R. CARROLL
SECONDED BY: G. W. MONTEITH
Tr~T WE ACCEPT THE TENDER OF TYE INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT FOR A JCB418
LOADER AT THEIR TENDER PRICE OF $ 29,724.00 WITH THE COUJ~TY'S
,MICHIGAN 85A LOADER AS A TRADE IN. SUBJECT TO THE MINISTRY OF
"['RANSPORTATION AND COMMUNICATIONS' APPROVAL.
CARRIED"
"MG)VED BY: G. W. MONTEITH
SECONDED BY: S. J. GLOVER
Tl~T WE ACCEPT THE TENDER OF RENASH TRACTOR & EQUIPMENT LTD. FOR
A JOHN DEERE 350C BULLDOZER AT THEIR TENDERED PRICE OF $ 9,217.00
WITH THE COUNTY'S TRACTOR #15 AS A TRADE IN. SUBJECT TO THE
MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION AND COMMUNICATTONS' APPROVAL.
CARRIED"
"MC)VED BY:
G. W. MONTEITH
SECONDED BY: G. D. SIMPSON
THAT WE ACCEPT THE TENDER OF RANKIN FORD SALES (1971) LTD. FOR A
FORD LTS 8000 AS PER THEIR TENDER PRICE OF $ 27,167.19 INCLUDING
PROVINCIAL SALES TAX.
CARRI ED"
"M~)VED BY: S. J. GLOVER
SECONDED BY: G. D. SIMPSON
TliAT WE ACCEPT THE QUOTATION OF FRINK CANADA FOR A MODEL 470K
s~ow PLOW, SNOW WING, HARNESS, ETC., AND A MODEL 10B3 DUMP BOX
WITH ALL NECESSARY EQUIPMENT AS PER THEIR QUOTATION OF A,PRIL 12/76
I
At A QUOTED PRICE OF $ 13,600 PLUS PROVINCIAL SALES TAX. SUBJECT TO
MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION AND COMMUNICATION9 APPROVAL~
CARRIED"
ST. THOMAS, ON TAR 1 0,
APRIL 15, 1976.
PAGE 5.
TRE MEETING ADJOURNED FOR DINNER.
AFTER DINNER. WARDEN SCHAFER IN ATTENDANCE.
TllE COMMITTEE ON NEGOTIATIONS with the St. Thomas Sanitary Collection
~
SerVices Ltd. reported their commentS on the proposed agreement had been
forwarded to the St. Thomas Sanitary Collection Services Ltd.
communications of Righway 4 west of Road 20 in port Stanley to the Village
TRE PROPOSED REVERSION by the Ministry of Transportation and
felt that the Road would meet County Road criteria if reverted and if it
TllE ENGINEER REPORTED THAT Municipal Roads Officials in Toronto
waS discussed.
became a burden on the village.
It waS discUssed to inform Ron McNeil that the committee no longer wished a
Reeve Nemett indicated that the transfer was probablY inevitable.
meeting with the Minister of Transportation and communicatiOns.
programme which waS discUssed at some length.
Tl:1E ENGINEER pRESENTED TRE ATTACl:1ED proposed ASphalt Resurfacing
tlMOVED BY: M. A. SCRAFER
SECONDED BY: L. R. CARROLL
THAT TRE ENGINEER BE AllTRORIZED TO CALL TENDERS FOR ROT MlX
ASp1!ALT PAVING IN CONJUNCTION WITR TllE COUNTY'S CONSTRUCTION
PROJECTS ON
(A) ROAD 8 & 15 IN DUTTON
(B) ROAD 20 IN PORT STANLEY
(C) ROAD 34 IN BELMONT
(D) ROAD 30 AND 52 IN yl\BMOUTR TOWNSRIP.
CARRIED"
ST. THOMAS, ONTARIO,
APRIL 15, 1976,
PAGE 6.
"M()VED BY: G. D. SIMPSON
SECONDED BY: S. J. GLOVER
TlIAT THE ENGINEER BE AUTHORIZED TO CALL TENDERS FOR HOT MIX
ASPHALT RESURFACING ON
(A) ROAD 15 FROM ROAD 2 TO ROAD 8 IN., DUTmON
(B) ROAD 42 FROM HIGHWAY 73 TO ROAD 40
(c) ROAD 34 FROM WEST LIMIT OF BELMQNT WESTERLY APPROXIMATELY 1/2
MILE:
(D) ROAD 45 FROM ROAD 36 TO ROAD 35 AND FROM HIGHWAY 4 TO ROAD 28
(E) ROAD 39 (PATCH ON CHATHAM ST.)
(F) ROAD 46 - FROM CORINTH TO THE OXFORD COUNTY LINE.
CARRIED"
"MOVED BY: S. J. GLOVER
SECONDED BY: G. W. MONTEITH
THAT WE AUTHORIZE THE ENGINEER TO CALL TENDER.S IN CONJUNCTION
WITH THE COUNTY'S TENDER FOR HOT MIX PAVING FOR THE ASPHALT NEEDS
O][i' OTHER MUNICIPALITIES AND AGENCIES IN THE COUNTY.
CARRIED"
THE ENGINEER WAS INSTRUCTED to reply to the London Auto Sport Club
and suggest they contact the residents of their proposed Test Sections for
their cuuuuents.
MR. JACK ELLEY, OF THE ST. THOMAS-ELGIN HEALTH UNIT, Mr. Doug
Marow of the Ministry of the Environment and Ray Collard in attendance.
Mr. Elley and Mr. Marow discussed and reported on the Ministry of Health
and the Ministry of the Environment proposed Mosquito Abatement Progrannne
to prevent encephalitis.
AFTER CONSIDERABLE DISCUSSION
ST. T1l0MAS, ONTARIO,
APRIL 15, 1976.
PAGE 7.
"MOVED BY:
M. A. SCH1\FER
~
SECONDED BY: L. R. CARROLL
THAT WE RECOMMEND TO cOUNTY cOUNCIL THAT PERSONNEL TO BE
LICENSED BY THE MINISTRY OF THE ENVIRONMENT FOR A MOSQUlTO
ABATEMENT PROGRAMME AND WE RECOMMEND THAT THE COUNTY HEALTH
UNIT pURCHASE A TON OF ABATE n FOR cOUNT$ - CITY USE.
CARRIED"
"MOVED BY:
G. D. SIMPSON
SECQNDED BY: G. W. MONTEITH
THAT WE ADJOURN TO APRIL 28 AT 9 :00 A.M.
REGULAR MEETING MAY 12 AT 10 :00 A.M.
CARRIED"
~/JU---
CHAIRMAN
~ '~-
~.~~
POINTS TO CHECK - APRIL 22 /7 b
'---
1. Erosion at Wanetta Beach.
2. Port Bruce harbour and east of harbour.
3. Stalter Gully - back to 2nd Concession.
4. At Passionate Fathers - Road 42.
5. Port Burwell - west beach build up.
6. East Beach erosion and sea wall.
7. Erosion at Van Order culvert.
8. Erosion in Fields, Emerson, Kaufman, etc.
9. Erosion Bathes ?
10. Long Point - Gabion Baskets by M.T.C - Highway 59.
Gabion Baskets - Woodstock Ave., Long Point.
11. Turkey Point - work by Charlotteville Township.
12. Port Ryerse - cottages, etc., rock at end of road near Young Creek.
13. Me,~t Ed Coates at Port Dover and get the guided tour of Haldimand
Region.
14. Port Maitland - house and store.
15. Low banks.
(,
,i)
'~
Road 34
Road 39
Road 42
Road 45
Road 45
Road 46
Road 15
"
tt~J2- ~_ ~
"^~
RESURFACING BREAKDOWN
1976 ESTIMATE
April 15, 1976
from M.O.E. (Belmont) to County Line
Asphalt Tender Value 18,000
Total Project Value 22,000
Elgin County Share 50%
$ 11,000
Chatham Street Slide
Asphalt Tender Value 3,000
$
4,000
Project Value
Highway 73 to Road 40
Asphalt Tender Value 36,000 Project Value $ 42,000
Road 36 to Jaffa
Asphalt Tender Value 53,000 Project Value $ 62,000
Highway 4 easterly to Road 28
Asphalt Tender Value 76,000 Project Value $ 94,000
Corinth to County Line
Asphalt Tender Value 35,000 Project Value $ 43,000
Road 2 to Road 8
Asphalt Tender Value 13,000 Project Value $ 15,000
$ 271,000
~~
~~'
COUNTY OF ELGIN ROAD DEPARTMENT
TRUCK TENDERS
1. International Harvester Co.,
1712 Dundas St. E.,
London, Ontario.
1975 International F2050 Fleester
1.66" W.B. 102" C.T.
1.2,000 lb. front end - 11 x 20 front tires
50" rear axle spread
$ 25,525.92
2. Rankin Ford Sales (1971) Ltd.,
1365 Dundas St. E.,
London, Ontario.
1976 Ford LTS 8000
185" W.B. 126" C.T.
16,000 lb. front end - 15 x 22.5 - 16 ply tires
60" rear axle spread
$ 27,167.19
3. Eastgate Ford Sales & Service Ltd.,
350 Parkdale Ave. N.,
Hamilton, Ontario.
1976 Ford LTS 8000
20,000 front end
60" rear axle spread
$ 30,330.22
'h
~J~ /'.--~,/
~
1.:.----
---;:'"
EVALUATION OF TRUCK TENDERS
April / 76
:t.'
1. International F2050 Fleetstar
Price
$ 25,525.92
Add Flange for Front End Pump
Approximately
50.00
Box - Front Hoist
Delivery Date week of May 17 at earliest
$ 4050 + tax
$ 4,333.50
(Length of Box 12' - 6" - 13.0 cu. yd. capacity) ·
Helper Spring Required for Snow Plow
Approximately
$
200.00
$ 30,109.42
Availability.,
(1) Must be repainted (now gold).
(2) Radiator Illust be changed and different radiator and
kind installed. We understand parts availability \
could be a problem.
Likely delivery date of unit - likely May 20 at earliest,
problems i.n getting a proper radiator may be into June.
2. Ford LTS 8000
Price
$ 27,167.18
$ 3,875.00
Add Box
14' - 6" long - 15.0 cu. yd. capacity
$ 31,042.18
Plus Savings em using same pump and oil reservoir for box
and hoist.
.~;
ADDED FEATURES ON FORD
- Longer wheelbase, 60' inch axle spread on Ford
50 inch spread on International.
- 16,000 lb. fron~ end and high flotation tires (15.00 x 22.5 16 ply) on Ford.
;
12,000 lb. front ~nd and 11.00 x 20 12 ply tires on International.
- 100 gallon fuel tank on Ford vs 82 gallon guel tank on International.
Ford Truck has a higher legal load carrying capacity than International
and length for a bigger box.
AVAILABILITY .. Ford now - could be sent to Frink next for box. Would have
unit by April 28 or sooner.
:f
()J;o-;~
( / IiA,r
lV'
COUNTY OF ELGIN ROAD DEPARTMENT
TENDERS FOR BULLDOZER
April 1976
PRICES ARE NET AFTER TRADE IN
1. Plested Equipment Ltd.,
430 1st St.,
London, Ontario.
Massey Ferguson
MF200
$ 8,700.
2. Renash Tractor & Equipment Ltd.,
Box 670,
Lambeth, Ontario.
John Deere
JD350C
$ 9,217.
3. International Harvester,
425 3rd St.,
London, Ontario.
International
500E
$ 15,000.
4. Crothers Ltd.,
50 Enterprise Drive,
London, Ontario.
Ca t D3
(Demonstrator)
$ 16,130.
New Cat D3
$ 21,118.
II
,~
~.1
ii' ,
~
COUNTY OF ELGIN ROAD DEPARTMENT
TENDERS FOR FRONT END LOADER
PRICES ARE NET AFTER TRADE IN
AL TERNA TE "A"
April 1976
New Machine including ROPS Cab unless stated.
1. Tye Industrial Equipment,
225 King St.,
Thorndale:, Ontario.
JCB4l8
$ 29,724
2. West Metro Ford Equipment Sales Ltd.,
1911 Albion Road,
Rexdale, Ontario.
M9W 5K7
3. Capital Equipment Limited,
2 Royal Crest Rd.,
Rexdale, Ontario.
Ford A-64
$ 30,636.
Michigan 55lllA
$ 31,000.
Plu.s Cab
4. Renash Tractor & Equipment Ltd.,
P. O. Box 670,
Lambeth, Ontario.
5. Equipment Sales & Service
1030 Martin Grove Rd.,
Rexdale, Ontario.
John Deere
JD544l3
$ 32,395.
Yale 1900
$ 36,014.
6. General Supply Co. of Canada (1973) Ltd.,
5280 Dixie Rd.,
Mississauga, Ontario.
f
f'
,~
;f~'
7. Sheridan Equipment Ltd.,
P. O. Box 2334, Terminal A,
London, Ontario.
Volvo Model
846
$ 39,000.
Fiat Allis
605B
$ 39,372.
~I
COUNTY OF ELGIN ROAD DEPARTMENT
TENDERS FOR FRONT END LOADER
ALTERNATE "An
8. Fedquip Incorp.
P. O. Box 2213,
London, Ontario.
9. P1ested Equipment Ltd.,
430 First St.,
London, Ontario.
10. Crothers Ltd.,
50 Enterprise Drive,
London, Ontario.
April 1976
Pag e 2
Hough H60 E
$ 40,095.
Massey Ferguson
MF55
$ 43,100.
Caterpillar
Model 930
$ 43,226.
11. Maple Leaf Industrial Sales Ltd.,
335 Leaside Ave.,
Stoney Creek, Ontario.
12. Blackwood Hodge Ont. Ltd.,
16 Royce Court,
London, Ontario.
Ford
A-6!.~
$ 43,500
Terex
72-31
$ 51,100.
Plus Cab
,
,(::,~~~?
.~..
ST. THOMAS, ONTARIO,
MARCH 31, 1976.
PAGE 1.
THE COUNTY OF ELGIN ROAD COMMITTEE MET at the MUnicipal Building
on March 31 at 10:00 A.M. All members except Reeve Wilson present. Also
present Frank Clarke of the Ministry of Transportation and COr.....~.Jnications.
TUE MINUTES OF THE MEETING of March 10 were read and approved.
THE ENGINEER REPORTED ON THE WORK TO DATE AS FOLLOWS:
1. The 5 .lmployees laid off in February had been recalled on Mar'ch 23
as a number of employees were off due to illness.
2. Winter Control had been light and snowfence would be picked up starting
next w.lek.
3. Repair~!) to trucks were still heavy, particularly sander truck,s where
salt hild gotten into rear axles, etc.
4. Mud sl:Ldes and drainage problems had been extremely heavy due to super
satura,ted ground conditions.
5. Brushing gathering was continuing and would take several week.s yet,
the Budget has been long expended.
6. McLaws W8,S crushing gravel at the Pleasant Valley Pit.
7. 5 calculators had been purchased for the office and the old ones sent to
the ga:r.age, or junked.
8. A new lalectric typewriter to replace the present typewriter which is 12
years 4)ld had been purchased.
9. The 01.:1 photocopier had ceased work and a decision on a new machine would
be roadla shortly.
10. The update 0 f the Needs Study was continuing.
ST. TROMAS, ONTARIO,
MARCR 31, 1976.
pAGE 2.
1.1.. Dutton council had appyeved the sale of 5 lots in Dutton and
sUggested the 2 lotS on John Street be sold first with the
stipulation that a bDuSe foundation must be comPleted in 6 months.
~"
12. "Repairs to the bearings of the Wardsvi1.1.e lIridge would be \\lade by
Coneneo Canada Ltd. on a time and \\laterlal basis due to the problems
of jacking up the bridge. The County would supplY worlcn\8n and cutting
and welding and the pyeject would be supeTVised by "R. C. Dunn and
13. !hat the Officials of Conenco Canada Ltd. felt that the lower chord
AssociateS Ltd.
of the Walker bridge could be strengthened by stressed cables, the
abuttl\8nts relieved and the bearing replaced, and with an expenditure
of $ 50,000 to $ 60,000 the brldge might have a useful life of another
8 to 10 yeaTS. Soil tests would be required to ascertain if the
abutments were likely to continue moving to an extent that the other
work WOUld not be practical. The cotll\llutee autho'[ized soil tests and
a preliminary esti\\late of the cost of the other work which would be
reviewed with the County of Middlesex before any \\laior work waS done.
14. !he Engineer yeported that yepairs to the piers and abutments of the
MiddlemisS bridge would be necessary this sutll\lleT.
'tIlE wARDEN. C'ilAlRl4AN AND ENGINEER REl'OR!ED ON s..lid Waste stating
that a meeting had been held with Southwold !oWl\ship, but that southWOld had
indicated that they would be opposing the St. !hO\\laS Sanitary Collection
SeTVices Ltd. application for the South_ld !oWl\ship site. They alsO reported
that a draft agreement had been received but had not been reviewed.
ST. THOMAS t ONTARIO,
MARCH 31, 1976.
PAGE 3.
CORRESPONDENCE WAS READ FROM
(1) The On1~ario Municipal Board setting hearing dates for appeals from
Land Djlvision Committee Reports.
(2) From the Township of Yannouth with Zoning By-Law regarding zoning
land n4~ar the L. & p. S. Railway on Road 29 for Recreational
pu rpo S4~S .
MR. LYLE WELLS of Frank Cowan Co. in attendance.
TIlE MEETING ADJOURNED FOR DINNER.
AFTER DINNER Reeve Wilson in attendance.
THE COUNTY INSURANCE PROGRAM was reviewed following the attached
report by the Engineer. Mr. Wells recommend.ed the increasing of deductible
limits wher4l practical to lower the cost of insurance and overhead costs.
A1PTER DISCUSSION AND QUERIES
nl'iOVED BY: L. R. CARROLL
SECONDED BY: S. J. GLOVER
THAT WE RENEW OUR INSURANCE POLICIES WITH THE FRANK COWAN CO.,
NAMELY MUNICIPAL LIABILITY, NON OWNED AUTO, AUTOMOTIVE FLEET,
NON LICENSED EQUIPMENT FLOATER, RADIO, FLOATER, BOILER & MACHINERY
It>OLICY BOND, VALUABLE PAPERS, OFFICE CONTENTS, MOVING PERMIT
INSURANCE, FIRE INSURANCE ON COUNTY GARAGES, AND WORKMEN'S
GOMPENSATION AND COUNCILLOR'S ACCIDENT POLICY WITH THE FOLLOWING
GHANGES FROM PREVIOUS YEARS -
(1) AUTOMOBILE FLEET $ 500 DEDUCTIBLE
(2) NON LICENSED EQUIPMENT FLOATER $ 1000 DEDUCTIBL,E
(3) FIRE INSURANCE ON COUNTY GARAGES $ 1000 DEDUCTIBLE.
CARRIED"
ST. THOMAS, ONTARIO,
MARCH 31, 1976.
PAGE 4.
MR. WELLS LEFT THE MEETING.
CORRESPONDENCE WAS READ FROM THE Lower Thames. Valley Conservation
Authority stating that they would assume the Crane prop,erty on Road 14 and
maintain it as a wayside park.
"l~OVED BY: G. D. SIMPSON
SECONDED BY: M. A. SCHAFER
THAT THE ENGINEER BE AUTHORIZED TO CONTACT THE UN IVERS ITY OF
liES TERN ONTARIO TO ASCERTAIN IF THE UN IVERS I.TY WOULD BE AGREEABLE
~ro THE COUNTY TRANS FERRING THE TITLE OF CRANE P ARK TO TIHE LOWER
THAMES VALLEY CONSERVATION AUTHORITY.
CARRIED. n
CORRESPONDENCE WAS READ FROM Wm. Millard on Road 45 requesting
County assi~stance in crossing County Road 45 near Highway 19 with a drain.
The matter lilas discussed and the Engineer instrocted to obtain mor'e
infonnationl,
APPROVAL WAS GIVEN the Chairman a,nd Warden to open Equipment Tenders
to be presented to the next meeting.
CORRESPONDENCE WAS READ from the Village of Port Burwell requesting
the,. problem regarding parking on Road 42 be tabled until the Village Council
had discuss4td the matter further.
rr WAS DECIDED TO CONTACT Mr. R. McNeil further regarding the
proposed trl!nsfer by the Ministry of Transportation and. CC"i",,,,,Jnications of
Highway 4 W4tst 0 f Road 20 to the Village 0 f Port Stanley. as nothing had
been heard in the past month.
TIlE ENGINEER REPORTED THAT IT APPEARED that property owners in the
Carrs Br1dg~l area of Road 52 were satisfied with the proposed realignment of
ST. THOMAS, ONTARIO,
MARCH :31, 1976.
PAGE 5.
Road 52 acnlSS Kettle Creek and that a meeting with the Kettle Creek
Conservation Authority had been satisfactory.
TIlE ENGINEER RECOMMENDED THAT THE property of Phyllis Ferguson
be appraised and a settlement reached if possible. The Engineer was
authorized to have an appraisal made.
TIm ENGINEER PRESENTED Calcium Chloride prices as attached.
U}40VED BY: L. R. CARROLL
SECONDED BY: S. J. GLOVER
~['HAT WE ACCEPT THE QUOTATION OF (A) POLLARD BROS. FOR LIQUID
CALCIUM CHLORIDE AT $ 73.50 PER FLAKE TON EQUIVALENT. (B) ALLIED
CHEMICAL LTD. FOR BULK CALCIUM CHLORIDE AT $ 73.50 PER TON AND
(C) ALLIED CHEMICAL LTD. FOR BAGGED CALCIUM CHLORIDE AT.' $ 88.80
PER TON.
CARRIED. It
ROAD INSPECTION WPS TENTATIVELY set for April. 28 West Elgin.
it.
U:MOVED BY:
s. J. GLOVER
SECONDED BY: G. W. MONTEITH
THAT WE ADJOURN TO 10: 00 A.M., APRIL 15.
CARRIED."
h~ .' a/)A~
v ( CHAIRMAN. .
f~~<~
I~'
CALCIUM CHLORIDE QUOTATIONS 1976
LIQUID CALCIUM CHLORIDE
1. Pollard Bros. t Harrow
2. Miller Paving Ltd., Buttonvi11e
(Last Year's price $ 66.15
Inc Tease of 11'0)
FLAKE CALCIml CHLORIDE
1. Allied Chemical Ltd.
In Bulk
(Last Yellr's price $ 66.15
Increasle 0 f 11%)
2. Allied Chemical Ltd.
In Bags 25 Ton Truck Loads
(Last year's price $ 82.40
Ine rea se 0 f 7.8%)
.~
$ 73.50 per ton
$ 74.00 per ton
$ 73.50 per ton
$ 88.80 per ton
the fotlo~ing is a list of policies in effect on countY
n rt d 'i bilit~ Unless othe~ise stated policies
>>ui\.dings, x tope Y an ... a ' ·
are thtough the fnlnk Co,.an Company and are due January 29. 1976 and
haVe been under a >>inder PolicY to keep them in effect until the
Colll!1littee has revie~d them.
~
INSURANCE REVIE~ 1976
(
{~
/J~
i..
Insurance (like everything else) haS gone up in cost
and as the v.alue of itemS insured haS alsO risen a double inCrease
in cost has occurred. >>ecause of thiS cost the county ~st give
serious consideration to ptotecting itself against the majOr losses
of liability. accident and fire and accept the sman 10sses of accident
, ,-+- of the cost of doing bUsiness. our '!\gents SUgge.st
and fi reas a pal..'" .
that a ueducti\)1e ClaUse be used ...hich in some P01ides might give
sa"ings up t02lf/..
1.~
l.imits 0 f l.iability per c 1aim $ 5. 000. 000.
thiS genera1 'l.t~\)ility PoHcY p.rotectSRoads. NonHcensed E<luil'ment.
t ,\-'1) . S 6 the Cou rt 1\ouse Block and includes a libe1 and slander c1aUse but
does not itlc1Ude E1gin flanor or ~eea spraying.
~ 3 232 54 of ~hich $ 2.810.68
In 1975 the charge against Roads ~as ~ , · ..' .
against 29 up1icensed piece~ of e<lUit>ment ($ 96.92 each) which 1eft
$ 421.85 unsubid i zed bY the 1'Ii n i st ry 0 f t tan spo rut ion and C ot(Utll1nica t ionS ·
')S\
j,'
2.~
~ 5 000 000 protectS County against dalDllge suitS,
l.iability l.imits. ~ .. '
etc. imToWing vehicles not o""ed by the CountY but <olQr\<.ing for the
CountY (e.g. pri"ate dump trucks, private cars, etc.). l.iability for
b .""d or acnuired bY the CountY is $ 50,000.
1icensed vehic1es orrow- ~
Cost in 1975 ,.as $ 257.
I
l
f
~
\
I
iO
~l
/)\0 \) )
~-"\
I
~
f,
INSURANCE REVIEW 1976
Pa ge 2
3. Automotive Fleet
Liability $ 5,000,000 per accident. Policy is presently $ 100
Deductible Policy all Perils with a Guaranteed Value Replacement
Clause. The 1975 initial premium was $ 7,359 for 27 vehicles and
the floa1t. Although our merit rating on both collision and
comprehensive is very good a general increase in insurance rates
will result in a considerable premium increase.
In an attempt to reduce costs we have lowered the Re:placement Cost
Value of 2 of our old trucks which merely serve as Sander Truck,s
to the p40int of cost of similar replacement trucks on the marke:t.
Further ,savings could be made by adopting a $ 250 deiductible on all
, pe ri Is.
The valu1e of our Fleet is now $ 316,000
(replacement cost) vs.
$ 300,000
in 1975.
4.
Non Licensed E~uipment,'-Floater
Equipment is protected on a Subscription Floater Policy with a number
of companies through Frank Cowan' Company.
All non licensed equipment, materials, tools, etc. ~lre protectE~d
against fire,'wind, collisi,on, upset, theft, etc.
Major equipment is listed and has a Gua ranteed Valu4~ Replacement Clause.
Snow Plow Equipment, Tools and Stock are listed separately, and valued
as groups. Any equipment rented to the County without operatolrs is
protected to a vlaue 0 f $ 50,000.
Total Equipment, Tools and Stock items on our 1975 Policy had II value
of one million dollars. (Cost of Policy somewhat over $ 10,000)
Our revised list for 1976 has a value of$ 950~OOO.
In an at,tempt to reduce the cost of insurance. $01l1e of the olde1t"
equipment which we would trade in several years has been reduc.ad to
actual market value.
Further savings could be made by adopting a $ 1000 deductible clause
on losses.
INSURANCE REVIEW 197~
Page 3
5. Radio Floater
This is presently a separate policy with a premium ()f $ 640 in 1975.
Insures Mobiles, Base Stations and Towers. Our Insurance CompHny'
suggests it be incorporated into our General Equipment Floater
Policy ",ith a $ 250 deductible clause. '
6. Surveying EQuipment Floater
Present Policy is in force to January 1978. No premiums due.
7. Boiler ,and Machinerv Policy
Insurance on' Boilers and Pressure Vessels such as Garage Boiler,
Ai r Camp resso r, Cent re Li ne Ma rke r, Comp ress ion Tanks, etc.
Liability limit $ 5,000,000 and $ 200,000 property damage on our
property if an expolsion or rupture occurred.,
Premium for 1976
$ 203.
8., Weed SpraY Liabilitv
Protects County against damages from Municipal Spraying on County
Roads - cost $ 336 in 1975 which is not subsidized by the Ministry
of Transpo rtation and Communications. I f no spraying is done in
1976 the policy is not needed.
9.. Bond
Bond Limit $ 50,000. Blanket Bond on all County employees for
protection of the County against theft and vandalism, etc.
Road Department share approxi.mately $ 140 for 1976.
10. Valuable Papers
Total of $ 100,000 on valuable papers throughout the County.
Road De.partment pays on $ 45,000 of this. Premium about $ 95
;
annuall.y. Polity provides for costs of replacing records,
resu rvE~ying costs, etc. if records are damaged or destroyed.
11.
Office Contents
I
On EngiLn~er's office, 79 StEinley Street, Floater as part of CIOUrt:
House insurance. . Contents insured for $20,000.
INSURANCE REVIEW 1976
Page 4
12. Moving l?ennit Issuance Insurance
A continuing policy which protects County against all suits
because of issuance of moving permits, etc. Cost $ 6.00 per
permit issued (paid for by applicant).
13. Insurance on County Garage
Protection White Station and Rodney Garages against fire,
rnaliciousacts, windstonns, etc.. extended coverage and damage
from falling radio tower.
Values for 1976 - Main Garage
$ 325,000
Other values - Old Hange r Bldg.
100,000
Small Storage Bldg.
25,000
Salt Storage Bldg.
10,000
Rod~ey Ga rage
10,000
$ 470,000
, Fire Insurance Rates a re up 011 all buildings except: Main Gci rage.
However the value of it has been raised.
A $ 1000 deductible would reduce premium cost considerably.
14. Workmen's Compensation
Rates - 1975 - Cleric~l 5~per $100 of payroll
Outside Workers $1.75 per $100 of payroll.
for - 1976 - Clerical 75<;. per $1000 f payroll
Outside Workers $2.50 per $100 of pc:lyroll~
:~
r
1"
r
Estimated premiums for 1976 are approximately $ 17,000
Credit from 1975 - $ 580
(On ,any outside work our Workmen's Compensation Premiums are
recovered from person employing us.)
The limit for compensation p~r person was raised in 1975 to
$ 15,000 per person from $ 12,000 in 1974 by the Wor.kments
Compensation Bo~rd.
!i:
J:
Ji
t,
"
j,
II,
;;
6.
7.
8.
March 10, 1976
JJ~;
~'JrP
~ hlb
, I~
Conditions ReAgreement between County of EIgi~ and the St. Thomas
Sanitary Collection Services Ltd. re the disposal of solid waste
from the County of Elgin at the St. Thomas Sanitary Collection Services
Ltd. proposed Southwold Township site.
1. Terms of Contract
Agreement is dependent on the St. Thomas Sanitary Collection
Services Ltd. obtaining approval t6 operate.
Starting when use of site begins.'
Duration. for life of si.te.
Agreement to be'Registered on Title.
2. Any MunJcipality has the right, to accepts tonnage price or a per
capita price using Step-Unit price. .
Minimum contract period shall be 5 years for 1st contract.
Renewals of contra ct sha II be' a minimum of 3 years.
After expiry of the term of its intial'agreement or subse~uent
agreements the Municipality has the option of:
1- opting out of the agreement
2- changing from per capita rate to ton'nage rate or 'vice-versa
If Municipality opts out - it may opt in again ,at any time. '
Any Municipality not having an agreeme.nt may opt in at ,any time.
Agreement to be avai,lab1e. for use of all local Municipalities in
E.lgi.n County other than St. Thomas and SouthwoldTownship.
Rates to he: governed by Step-f,tate Chart basis ,o:n, total amount of
waste to ,he deposited in the site onan.annualbasis. The first
and last year to be Pro Rated.
3.
4.
5.
Rates are other ,than, requirement s of Southwald Township c~ nC! the
cost of. improvement ofacess roads -'. such costs to be sub ject
to further discussions and agreements.,
Rates do not, include i.ncreased costs caused by changes'in:regulations
by the PrOvincial Governrnent,' nor for t,he cost, 'if any, of, leachate
removal. These cost~1 if any, are to bed~tailed and spread
over 'entire! tonnage of solid waste per annum.
Contract is' effective 'between ran,ge of 30,000 ton to 85,000 ton
per annum (or p;ro rated). If the tonn.age per annum is not in
, this range the Contract is to be renegotiated~ '
Of the agreed charges for disposal, the. Chart Rates aret.o be.
for 1976
Chart Rate.: for disposal to be adjusted annually according to DBS
" .. . . ,
as follows:, 1. Ownership cost of site as shown is not :subject
to adjustment.
2. The remaining portion of charge is to ble a9)usted
arinually in Jan~ary tor the entire calendar year
as follows:
D B S December of previous year
DB s'ro~ December of lY15
times the remaining portion of the charge
;
Page 2
9. Tonnage Rate times MacLaren formula .365 'ton per year per person to
be used in calcul~ting per capita charge.
10. If a per capita. rate is chosen by the Municipality then the population for
the MuniCinality i~ defined, as follows:
The population of any Municipality on (January 1st shall be
used for the entire ensuing year and shall be the latest
population figure available at that date from the Provincial
Ministry of Revenue Cen~us but shall not include the residents
of institutions such as Hospitals, Provincial, Municipal and
Private, Homes for the Aged, Ontario Police College etc.
]]. St. Thomas Sanitary Collection Services Limited shall accept for
disposal (within the limits of Provincial Regulations) at the chart
price (1) All Solid 'I.faste delivered by a,ny hauler under a contract
to a Municipality
(2) Any Inst'itutionalwaste delivered to the disposal area
(3) Commercial waste delivered to the'disposal area. Charges
for such waste to be billed to the Municipality
12. In calculating annual tonnage of solid waste entering the Waste
Disposal Site the follOWing shall be considered -
All Municipal Waste hauled by haulers under contract to any,lV[unicipality.
All Waste hauled directly by the Municipality of its agents including
Southwold Towriship.
All Waste hauled from any Industrial or Commercial. Organization
including any material to be reclaimed.
The following shall not be included -
Earth hauled for cover material or tOD s051.
Material hauled for road bUilding such as foundry sand fromCanron,
broken tile from Canada Vitrified etc.
A credit for any material sold as reclaimed.
13. Payments by the Municipality at approximately the 10th of the month
following after invoicing by St. Thomas Sanitary Collection Services
Limited of actual. tonhage deposited in the pr~vious month (i.e. charges
for the month of,January payable in Februa~y). If the Municipality
is, on a per capita Rate, 1/12 of Annual per capita rate is payable
per month on the basis of the above (i.e. charges for month of
January payable in February)
14. All Weigh Bills and Summary 'Sheets to be sent to the Municip.alities.
All copies preserved and subject to Municipal Audit and inspection.
15. Hours of Entry of Vehicle to be agreed upon for this agreement.
(Monday - Friday g P.M. - 5 P.M.?) L~ga1 Holidays excepted?
16. Type of Vehicles to be allowed into the site to be agreed upon.
17. Material from any Municipal' Conta in.er Site to be accepted at Chart Rate
and costs to bE~ billed to the Municipality for which the container is
designated.
'li;
LF
}':
iili
!f!'j
IVi
f~
~!i J,'
111
~1
~:
II] ~
II'
~
II
t
I
f
COUNTY OF ELGIN
SOLID vlASTE
'-//// A ~
I~-~
1~.,.h~.M
/
March 9, 1976.
ANALYSIS OF ST. 1~HOMAS SANITARY COLLECTION SERVICES POSITION OF MARCH 8, 1976
(1) OWNERSHIP COSTS
Based on a Capital Cost of $650,000 which will be returned in
yearly installments @ 9~% interest over 20 years.
Return pE!r year - $73,759 (say $74,000)
(2) OPERATING COSTS
Labour Costs
1 Supervisor
1 Spott€~r etc.
1 OfficE~ - Scaleman etc.
1 Loader operator
1 Dragline operator
St. Thomas Sanitary Collection Services estimate $74, :256 yearly
Equipment
l' Tandem D'llmp Truck, amortized over 5 years
1 Fiat Allis HD - 12G Loader Dozer,
amortized over 4 years
1 Dragline, amortized over 15 years
1 Set Scales, amortized ove~ 10 years
Misc. Equipment, amortized over 10 years
Costs per year @ ll!%
Truck i 9,649
Dozer .23,158
Dragline15,935
Scales 5,255
Misc. Equip 2,627
$56,624
Fuel Costs _ 15,660 gals. per year @ 45~'-
(No Prove Tax on Fuel)
,( over
(over
(over
(dver
(over
5 years)
5 years)
15 years)
10 years)
10 years)
Maintenance- Costs
Truck $ 7,000
Dozer l6~800
Dragline 7,333
Scales 3,000
Misc. Equip. 1,500
$35,633
Insurance~& Miscellaneous
-$i2,OOO
SUMMARY
$74,256
Equipment $56,624
7,047
35,633
12-000
$.Lts~ ~bU
Using Ope~rC!:ting Costs on a Straight
Labour Costs,
Capital C:ost of
Fuel Costs
Maintenan.ce Coats
Ins~rance
$35,000
$84,000
illO,OOO
30,000
15,000
,$7,047.00
(Say$lg6~.OOO )
l~ne Interpolation
J
,"
.~
'I
I
~
~.
,~
}:1
,
~i
I
YEARLY TONNAGE OF SOLID WAS~rE
Using St. Thomas.Sanitary Collection Services figures, less profit
'~'" ' ' and overhead
IN THOUSANDS OWNERSHIP OPERATING TOTAL S~T,S.C.PROPOSAL
30,,000 -" 35,000 2~28 5.72 8.00 ',7.34
'35,000 -40,000 1.97 ' 4.96 ' 6.93 :7.05
4.0,000 - 45,000 ' , 1.74 ' 4,.38 6.12 6.77
.,,45,000 .. 50,000 1.56 3'.92 5.48 ' 6.49
50 ,'OOQ-, 55, 000 ,1.41 ' 3.54 4~95 6.22'
, 55,,000 -60,000' 1.29 , 3.23 ' 4.52 ' 5.96
'60/000.'." '~5 ,000 ' 1.18 . ,2.98 4.16 5.72
,65.:,000 '.~?O,OOO 1.10 2.76 3086 5.47
70" OO~- ,'75 ;'000 1.02 2.57 ' 3.:59 5.23
'.. ,~5, 000.... 8,0,090 :0'.95 ' [J. 2..40, ' '3,.35 . 4.99
gO~OOO .. '85,000.: 0.9"0 2,.25 311:' 4.75,
o,!l
,~5, 000 ,.~ ,90,,000 0.85 . 2~13 2.9g .4.52: .
'.,"
I'.... ,
~ . ," ,
COUNTY OF ELGIN
SOLID WASTE I~RCH 9, 1976
~.;
m:
,!!t
?f.
,j:
l
,;[:
l'
I)
':
Ji
n!
~:
, '
~
~
!!
l'
11
Ii
ii
,I
11
!:
r
,I
[
~
I;
If} '-
(f~;fg~f!A~
f\fv~'\...JJ."lp1 j.,
/'
COUNrry OF ELGIN ROAD DEPART:fI.1ENT ESTIMATES OF ST. THOMAS SANITARYCotLECTION
SERVICES COSTS
Own~.tship Costs
Based on a Capital Cost of $500,000 with a residual value of $100,000
. $4001000 to be written off in 15 years @ 10%
Cost of Write off Portion (i.e. $400,000)
Interest on $100,000 Residual
------- $ 52,589
10,000
If Written off in 10 years cost is
Plus Interest on Residual
$62,589
$ 65,098
10,000
$ 7S,098
Case (1) ($63,000) on 55,000 - 60,000 Range is $1.10 per ton vs $1.29
La,bour
$75,000
Equipment @ 10%
Trucks and Associated Equipment sip Water Tank etc.
$35,000 over 6 years
Dozer - Compactor $85,000 over 7 years
Dragline $125,000 over 15 years
Scales $30,000 over 15 years
Misc. Equipment etc. $12,000 over 10 years
(including 2 pickup trucks, pumps, etc.)
Fuel Costs, Oil, Grease etc.
(50,000 'Ton) 7 gallon I ht
= 16,380 @ 45~
Maintenance of Equipment
'Trucks * 5,000
Dozer, Compactor 15,000
DraglinelO,OOO
Scales & Other Equip~ $3,000
$33,000
Insurance Misc. Expense, $12,000
Labour
Machine Ownership
Fuel
Equipment Maintenance
Insurance
FIXED COSTS
$75,000
$40,000
$10,000
$8,100
$ 33, 000. '
$ 2,000
$53,000
VARIABLE
$10,000
$125,000
*8,500
19,000
, 16,400
4,000
2.000
$50,000
.$ 7, 500
9t~..-~) . ... J-
. /c",,. I ~ ,Po"", aL.:: 0/,-,"-"1""'7
ooc>'~ Co~T 4'1r~~
~- ~ --
CJU""" ~'>
~~- - ~o
,,/0 -7~-
~- - ~-o
50 - .:;;-~-
:i~-- ~o
00 - ~~-
~~- - 70
70 ,- 7~"
7~- - So
80 - <<8~-
<;r__"-,,"_-W_.'" "-:t;", 'Z'H' , _..;~
~:~-
~. -'$""~'_'._"'..:_-' ",;4,~';_";'.,
./"~-s. 000
)
/~:Zl c~c
/~~) 000
/(0) 000
/(7)000
/78),600
/82 000
)
/ 8 Co) 000
I 20 0'00
)
/ '7 ~I 0 C) 0
- r / /
/78/ 000
-.'-=-:;-:'~~'!':"'~~~"~'.._,,--,"--=:-..,._.~~,.~ .'", __-~" .-.' ....,~4' _u, .:..._~.~~~~,~~:;';3~~'UJ:~~~:~~~,__,_:.c ,,~':,:;-~4<~";"~;,:,:;,;~:,:z~-~~-::;c;;;::'.: ._ ~_
ar~'(l.v:lT!oJ...{ (~~\
7~ n.. -;;..z
/
\. ~
O~M.ci1Z.. ~J.i,p C~~ l' ~~.\..\~r:l V
., E
'ib-R- ~-<..' ?f4\. ~ "
L/ s:::../_ " ...., Si. - /;1'].-..
7........- ~. .,......... ,#~'-'
"I
y~z I. y 7 /./~ -
~. '1 \ /.77' I. /0
~ .~-8. /. ~-~ I.o~-
.,3,.3\ /'7/ /.00
~. 10 /.;2., o. 7?
.2. "I' \ 1,18 o. 7~-
,;< . 7to /./0 0 ~z.
d' "2- /,02.< o. Yo
:2 . ~ -0 0, 7~- o. S'~.
~."o D.7o 0, &~ --
r-- -------
r ~O
( ::>.
":,,~'t.'___~'"
,_ _ ~~_~,~.J ~~:'v..__
v: '0/
*~
~7/JL S. TS::.:.' <;, ''j
, ?p~s,n L VI \-~, 1"
-
s:.< :t./ "7 ':t~./ - /; 0:.:"
"-" · -- ..7 ,,'oeJT
'(,fi 7o~- - o'~l
~. 7:>- ~,77 t- 0.02-
~c l<t C. . 17 f- o.~o
~~ 7z, C 1:2. ;J.. +0.-:;)0
~~/~~ ~ ~ ie. f o.~(p
,:, -: 0 't ~-I?z.. + o. ~€)
7.78 ~~il ... 0, G:>~
y.~y d:~~ + 0, (,\
7~~ 177 1- 0, C,,(p
-T /:>- i,l~ .., ~o
+0.-
----
v/
?a~ e~?/~
@. . 5'~/ e On tle~/dh.
c..o~1 +'; n Y'CS
J...04
....., - I
;;..7.2-
'') L1. J
0<' T(p,
;;<. a. l,
J. oj
I. 9G
/. <(1
/, 7~
/, {, ("
I. 5"8
/~s /
,~
;2,2,gb
.~
,I'
\\ -" I
(;..1.11 ~;..-"'"
I
t l'
COUNTY OF ELGIN ROAD DEPARTMENT
March 17, 1976.
The following Report is presented by your Special
Conunittee on negotiations with the St. Thomas Sanita1:7 Collectic.n
Services ]["td. for a Disposal Cost at their proposed Southwold
Township Site.
Your Committee has met with representatives of St. Thetmas
Sanitary (~ollection Services Ltd. and report as follows:
The following Rate Chart has been agreed upon by both
the Negot:lating Committee and representatives of the St. Thomas
Sanitary Collection Services Ltd. and is offered subject to County
Council t"c1tification for the use of any local municipality in the
County of Elgin other than the City of St. Thomas and the Township
of Southwc)ld. In considering the rate there are a considerable
number of conditions and Solicitors for both parties are presen1:1y
at work on a Draft Agreement.
Some of the major conditions are:
(1) Any Agreement is contingent on St. Thomas Sanitary Collectjlon
Serv'ices Ltd. obtaining all necessary approval~to use the site
as .a disposal area.
(2) To the rates must be added costs (if any) of improvement c.f
aec-ass roads and requirements 0 f Southwold Township.
(3) Consumer Price Index does not apply to the Ownership portion
of the rate. (Column 3 and 5)
(4) Price Per Ton or Price Per Capita may be used. Conversion
basled on McLaren fonnulae of .365 ton per person per year'l
(5) Tonnage of Waste Per Year is Total Tonnage received at site
for disposal for all Municipalities,' Industrial, Commercial,
etc. sources.
(6) Total Price Column includes Ownership Cost.
p'F.: PR~'tA
Amount 0 f
N'nOunt ,of 'Total Pt'ice
'tota'\. 'tonnage 'tota1. Price vthich 1.$
of 'Waste Pet' Annum Vlhich 1.s o~et'Shil?
Rec,a at Landfill site 01Allet'shil? ~ l~
~ ~
~ $ 3.04 $ .B3
$ 8.34 $ 2.28
30 .. 35 2.72 .72
7.44 1..97
35 .. 40 2.46 .64
6.75 '\..74
40 .. 45 2,,2.6 .57
6.1.9 1.56
45 ... 50 2.09 .51
5.72 1..41.
50 ... 55 1...96 .47
5.36 1..29
55 .. 60 1..84 .43
5.04 1..1.8
60 ... 65 1...74 .40
4.78 1..1.0
65 .. 70 1..66 .37
4.54 1.02
,0 ... ,5 1..58 .35
4.33 0.95
,5 .. 80 1.,.51. .33
4.1.5 0.90
80 .. 85
ST. THOMAS, ONTARIO,
MARCH. 10, 1976.
Page 1
Building on MaTCh 10. 1976 at 10:00 A.M. 11.11 members except
THE COUNTY OF ELGIN ROAD coMMITTEE MET at the Municipal
Reeves Wilson and Caverly were present.
THE MlNUTES OF THE MEETING OF li'EBRUi\lt'l 11 were read and
approved.
1. The ice staxnl of last Tuesday was the worst in the past 20
mE ENGINEER REPORTED ON THE \JOllK TO DATE AS FOLLOWS:
years and relllOved a great many tree bmnches which would take
the better part of a lIIOnth to clean up.
2. Two crews bad been working for the City of St. Thomas and one
for the Board of Education on brush clean up.
3. Winter Cont1:01 had been light in the past 2 weeks. but
expenditureS to date were approximatelY $ 175.000.
StoJ~ been installed on Road 39 at Port Burwell but it
was not known where the wnter was coming from.
4.
5. It bad not yet been possible to replace the stone block at
Port Burwell as they were still frozen in.
6. Truck # 25 bad been junked as there were no brakeS on the
tandem wheels and the clutch had gone out. The lIIOtor was
using an excessive alllOunt of oil and was not worth fixing.
7. Insumnce policies were being extended until the committee
would bave an opportunity to review the policies with the
'F rank. Cowan Co.
s't. 't\\0~' Oli't!bJt10.
~CU \,0, 1976.
Page 2.
8. Gra"el would be placed on l\&ad 43 as time pe-rmitted
starting at llDad 42.
9. 'the 'dhitn61s had agreed to accept the count1' s offel:
to l: tb.eil: P 1:'Opert1 south 0 f the 'to'lfl\ship 1:'Oad.
U}\ovED 'B"'l:
L. It. C~OLL
SWONDt!> ~"l 's G. ll. sl)lP50li
't'I:tA't flU!. 'F0a,()'d1liG l\CCOUli'tS ~E ~PROVt!> 'FOR PA'nIEli't
p...'CL1S't it 11 _ j,llOUN't1liG 'to $ . 840.51
PA'CL1S't it 12 _ ~OCli't1NG 'to 30,108.13
pt.'CL1S't it 13 _ j,llOUN't1liG 'to 63 ,146 · 58
PA"lL1S't t 9 _ ~OUN11liG 'to . 491.88
PA"lL1S't t 10 _ ~OUli't1l'lG 'to 29,186.61
ctJUt1.ED"
f "''MOVED' . 'B"'l t
}\. A. sCU~'EIt
SECOlillil> ~"ls G. 'd. MQN'tE1't\\
't'I:tA't 'dE 1'Il~E 'FR0l11100tJIl ~ ROSE 1UR1E m\1'tNE'l 't\\A't
POR't10li O'F 't\\E1R PROPE~ 1N 1..o'I 24 CONCESS10N V "ltJU'1OC't\\
L'l1liG SOU't\\ O'F 't\\E RO~ 't\\R()llGl\ CONCESS10li V OPE Nt!> ~"l
~"l-~ t 148 (~E1NG ~PROX1~EL"l 32 ;.eRES 1li 1O'tt.L) 'FOR
't\\E S\l11 O'F $ 30,000. 't\\E ld\\l'tNE'lS NO't 'to OPPOSE t.N"l
Al?PL1CA't10li ~"l 't\\E cOUN't"l O'F ELG1li 'to \lJ>.VE flU!. PROPER'!:'!
REZONt!> J!:tC. ,OR A G\U.VEL P1't ~ 't\\E ld\\l'tNE'lS 'to EN'tER
1li't0 t.N t.GREEllEli't 'd1't\\ flU!. cOCli'!:'! 'to L1cfl'SE ~ to GRAVEL
P1't 't'I:tA't l?OR't10li 0' 1..o'I 24 6. 25 liOR't\\ 0' flU!. 1()l1lliSl\lP RO;.tl
()\tNil> ~"l flU!. CO\lli'!:'! 0' ELG1l1 t.b\l'l 't\\E ld\\1'tNE'lS.
ci\Fll1.ED't
Sot:UI, vasn. 111S.JOSAl- waS diScUSsed at sotne length.
'da1:den Schafel:, Chai1:llllln coo\t ana the Rngineel: reported on
i i _At'" ~e..resentati"es 0 f the St. 't\:l,ol\lllS Sanitary
negot at ons W'" ,J.L $or
collectiOn services Ltd.
'"
ST. TROWS, ONTARIO,
MARCH. 10, 1976.
Page 3
'!:HE ENGINEER pRESENTED '!:Hi. ATTACI:lED REPORTS whi.ch
~,
we:re lliscussed by the committee.
an ag:r:eement using the rates based on the County's estimate of
THE COMM1TTEE !\GREED THAT the County shou1cl. offer
the costs, St. Thomas Sanitary collection Services Ltd. (page 1)
along with the terms and conditions SUggested.
'!:HE MEETING J\DJOURNED FOR DINNER.
AFTER DINNER REEVE WILSON was present.
(1) Fxelll'Ministry of Revenue stating that a Sales Tax Rebate
COR'RESpON!)ENCE W~ RUD AS FOLLOWS:
of $ 11,000 for 1975 would be forthcoming.
<:n From the TownshiPS 0 f Yarmouth and SouthWO ld with By- Law
rezoning certain lands for residential purposes.
(3) From the Workmen's COIIlPensation Board giving the reasons
why Glen Robbins had been denied compensation.
(4) l'rom the County of Elgin Road Depar\:lll8nt Employees Association
stating that the Association had increased their Retirement
,ok- .
Contribution .. $ 100 and requesting that the County of Elgin
do likewise.
"MOVED BY ~ s. J. GLOVER
SECONDED BY: L. R. CARROLL
THAT WE CONTRIBU'tE A SnnLIIR RETIREMENT ALLO'iIlINCE TO ROAll
DEPARTMENT E'Ml'LOYEES AS '!:HE ROJ\D DEPARTMENT EMPLOYEES'
ASSOCIATION NAMELY $ 100 10ND T1\tI.T MR. ESSELTINE BE GIVEN
THIS AMOUNT.
cJJ,tRIED"
s't. TRONl\S, ONTARIO,
~CR lO, 1976.
Page 4
(5.) frolll Port. Burwell Detacbm.8nt of the Ontario provincial
police requesting changes in Parlr.ing Regulations on lload
42 in front of the Detacbm.8nt Office. 'the Engineer
SUggested the tuatur be tabled until the views of the
Port Burwell council nad been received.
(6) London Automobile sport Club -requesting the use of Count'
lloads for sports Car ~llY, 'the Engineer waS instructed to
contact the club and reqpest farther information.
'fll,E 1!,NG1NEER REpORTED '!:RAT liE \\tlD gT with Rep resenta t iVes
of the Ministry of Tre.nsport.ation and Go\lllllllnications regaxding the
St. 'thotuas Expresswa, and it appeared that
(0 The Ministry of Transportation and C()IIIIl\Inications waS still
committed to building the Expresswa, altbougn land purchase
proble!l\S at the present d\1\8 were holding up the construction
of the underpass at the L.t. p.S. (C.N.R..) ~ilwaY'
(2) That likel, a 2 lane road WOUld be built for the ti\1\8 being.
(~) That likel, the port.ion of County lload 52 between Talbotville
and lload 26 would be used as the western end of the expressway.
(4) That the Count,'S construction of lload 30 and 52 east of
wellington lload would not interferecwith the Ministry of
Transpo r1;at ion and Co'l\lllUnica tions plans.
'lllE ENG1NEER pRESEJ:l'tEtl AND RJ,V1EWEtl 'lllE attached proposed
Budget for Solid Waste Disposal.
S't. 'tRoWS, ON'tAlttO,
NA1tCll \,0, \976.
Page 5
\'MOVED '61:,
L. 'R. cAR'ROLL
Si.CONl>'ED i'h G. 01. ldON'tEt'tR
't\\A't 'dE llEC()~ 'to cOUlff'f COUl'lCtL 't\\A't A C~T'l ~
Oi $ 1,000 iE S'E't Ul? tOll. SOL'ID waS'ti l)tsl'OSP>L 1.NCL\l'I)t~
'tlJ.i. c0U1<<'l'S (;o}i'tltUU'ttON 'tG 1t)N1>GN AllEA SOL'ID O1bS'tllo
sTUD1.
cl\ll'R11J)\t
'tlJ.i. 'ENGtN'EEll. l?1lESEN't'ED 'tlJ.i. A'l"tt.C\\'ED ll.l1.l?01l.'t of the
St. 'thOtaaS subUTban 'Road COtlJlli.ssion $00 ~i.e1il8d the colllllission's
Budget aoO ..:eportea tUt the CQllllllission had assumed foT constTllc.d0n
t'l,.,.....t nO.' ......on of 'Road 30 (Badi0 'Rosa) bet1il8en 'Road 52. aoO
pu-rposes .... r .~.
!a.tte-r&o't\ 'iri.dge.
"}lovED '61t
Si.CO~'ED~' G.01.~'tit'tR
'f\\A't 'dE coNCUR 'Et'tR 'tlJ.i. llESoUl'ttON Of 'tR'E S't. 'tR0}!AS snU1\'&~
ll.Ol>1'> co~tsStON ot }U.ll.Cll 8/16 ASsulOliG AS to SUB\l1\'&~ 11.01>1'>
c~'t'! ll.o!l\l 30 Bt.'t'ftl'.EN ll.O!I\l 52. AND 'tRE ll.o!l\l ,;LLO'dp,NC'E ll'E't'ftl'.'EN
cONCltSstONS X ~ xt 'l~OU'tR.
c~l'ED\'
G. D. sl}1PSO~
'llAOV'iD '61'
Si.CO~'ED~' ~. A.~~ll.
'f\\A't 'tR'E >>\l'I)G'E't oi s't. 'tROlUS S\l>>U1G~ ll.QfI1) C()~tsstON tN
~N't oi $ 145,000 tOll. CONS't'R\lc'ttON t.ND ~tN't'EN~Ct. ot 'tRt.
s't. 'tRQlU\S sn\lll.ll~ ll.O!I\lS s'l.S'tt.~ ~ $ 800 toll. NObl sUiS'ID tu.>>Li
t't'EM> toR 1916 >>'E A1?PRO'l'ED t.ND llECo~lID 'to cOUN't'! COUNCtL
iOlt c~'t'! COUNCtL A1?l?ltOV,;L.
s. J. GLOVER
C~liD"
ST. THOMAS, ONTARIO,
MARCH lO. 1976.
Page 6
THE ENGINEER REVIEWED THE ATTACHED BUDGET AND commented
on it. Some members felt that if Land Purchase or other difficulties
would not allow the diversion of Road 52 and replacement of Carrs
Bridge alternate engineering work should be available so that an
ot,her project could proceed. It was also suggested that an
additional amount of asphalt resurfacing could be done a:s well.
The replacement of Walker Bridge was discussed and while no change
was made in the Budget it was agreed to examine very carefully the
need for the bridge before plans would be commissioned Lor the
replacement of it.
"MOVED BY: M. A. SCHAFER
SECONDED BY: L. R. CARROLL
THAT WE RECOMMEND TO COUNTY COUNCIL THAT THE ROAD LEVY FOR
1976 BE $ 60_3.,000 AND THAT THE URBAN REBATE REMAIN AT 25%
AS IN FORMER YEARS.
CARRIED"
UMOVED BY:
L. R. CARROLL
SECONDED BY: G. D. SIMPSON
THAT WE RECOMMEND TO COUNTY COUNCIL THAT A RESOLU'rION BE
PASSED ADOPTING THE ATTACHED PROPOSED STATEMENT O:F WORK AND
EXPENDITURES FOR 1976 AND THAT THE STATEMENT BE FORWARDED TO
THE MINISTER OF TRANSPORTATION AND COMMUNICATIONS FOR APPROVAL.
CARRIEDn
THE ENGINEER REPORTED THAT THE CENTRAL ELGIN PLANNING
Board had withd.rawn their objection to more than one house lot on
the cut off corner of County Road 2() in Lot 7 Concession V Southwold.
ST. ~R()MAS, ONTARIO,
MARCH 10, 1976.
p~ge 7
uMOVED BY:
s. J. GLOVER
SECONDED BY: G. D. SIMPSON
'tllA'I: 'l:lI.E ENGINEER BE AUTHORIZED '1:0 RAVE A REVERENCE pLAN
pU,CED ON A POR'l:10N OF LO'!: 7 CONCESSION V SOll'l:RWOLD TOWNSllIP
O\fNED BY THE c()'llNTY OF ELGIN AND NO'!: USED FOR ROAD ALLOWANCE.
THE }..tl.ND TO BE DIVIDED INTa 5 LO'l:S AND 'l:lI.E ENGINEER
AlITHaRIZED '1:0 CALL TENDERS FOR 'l:lI.E SALE OF 2 LlYl'S.
CARRIED"
in the Village of Dutton along 'Road 8 should be sold as building
THE ENGDlEER REClil'MMENDED T11.AT 'l:lI.E PROPERTY not xequired
lets.
"MOVED BY: M. A. SCHAFER
SECONDED BY: S. J. GLCN'ER
T11.AT 'l:lI.E ENGDlEER BE AlI'l:llORIZED TO RAVE A REVERENCE PLAN
pLACED ON TKE }..tl.NDS IN DUTTON NO'!: REQUIRED FOR ROAD ALLOWANCE
pURPOSES. THE PLAN TO SHaW APPROXIMATELY 5 BUILDDlG LO'l:S AND
THA'l: THE ENGINEER BE AlITHORIZED Ta CALL TENDERS FaR THE SALE
OF 'IRE LO'tS.
cARRIED"
anG requested that he work. with the County of Elgin anG the Village
of Port Stanley to prevent the reversion of Highway 4 West of County
THE ENGDlEER REPORTED THAT KE HAD WRITTEN Ron &Neil
Road 20 to the Village of Port Stanley. llr. McNeil had b:tOugbt tbe
matter to tbe attention of tbe Ron. Jall\6S Snow Minister of Transportation
and Communications.
that they were interested in obtaining tbe Crane property on 'Road 14
'!:be Lower Thames Valley conservation Authority had inGieated
ST. THOMAS, ONTARIO,
MARCH 10, 1976.
Page 8
for Conservation pUqloses. The c01IIIIIittee felt that the Authority
should control the property if they were prepared to develop it for
park pUTPoses. The Engineer was inst:EUcted to ascertain the
Authority's plans.
THE ENGINEER REQUESTED TENDEllS BE CALLED for replacement
of certain equipment.
"MOVED BY:
L. R. CARROLL
SECONDED BY: G. W. MONTEITH
THAT TIlE ENGINEER BE EMt'vl'ft;RED TO CALlS FOR A LOADER WlTll
nIE COUNTytS MICHIGAN LOADER 1$ A TRADE IN.
CARRIED"
"MOVED BY:
G. W. MONTEITH
SECONDED BY: G. D. SIMPSON
THAT TIlE ENGINEER BE EMPOWERED TO CAJ.L TENDERS FORA TANDEM
DIESEL TRUCK AND BOX.
CARRIED"
"MOVED BY:
s. J. GLOVER
SECONDED BY: M.A. SCHAFER
THAT THE ENGINEER BE EMPOllEKW TO CALL TENDERS FOR A
BULLDOZER WlTll COUNTY'S TRACTOR # 15 AS A TRADE IN.
clRRIEDl-
"MOVED BY:
M. A. SCHAFER
SECONDED BY: S. J. GLOVER
TIlAT WE ADJOURN TO 10sOO A.M. MAllCR 31 OR TO THE CALL OF
TaE CHAIRMAN.
CARRIED"
?A..?:/2. ;1~. ~ /
~ t ~1~1:LJ
C~
fJ.. QpvtJ-. /yV
'0 ;~
S 'J\3li91:!~.l>UBu!Bt.N !.og>1> CO~lS~10N ~PO!!:
February I 76
'Ii
"'to The chat rman And 1<Iembers Of The St. Thomas Suburban Roads Commission.
on Suburban Roads and a . proposed Budget for 1')16.
Attached to thiS report is a Statement of Expenditures in 1')15
County contr;,l to allo\4 fo.r constru<:tion on that portion of the road t.hat
In 1915 a portion of Road 30 north 0 f Road' 52 waS reve rted to
the comroi s s ion was unable to fi na nc e. 1 t ",i tl be nece s sa ry to rea S sun,e
a portion of the reversion SO that the available funds for 1')16 !MY be
pa rt normal in natu re ",i t\1 exception 0 f Shou lder Gravell.ingon "\Ie \1 inf,ton
Road' (charged to Roadside Maintenance) and Surface' Treatment work on Road
Maintenance and overhead Expenditures in 1')15 ",e,re for the most
. utilized. '
22. (Fa 1.:rview Ave.).
",ith Ha i ntenance and Non Sub sid i zab \e' items gave atota \ .expend i tU re 0 f
Net Constnlction on Road 30 in 1915 totaled $ 111 ,416. 'n ",\elch
$ :229,1'\42. 10. Even a fter the H ini st. ry () f 'l TanSl'ortat ion and Communi ca t ions
Subsidy and the surplus.from 1')14"",rp deducted the. net deficit fo'r the
Gity of St. Thomas share was stight\y in excess of $ 2.000. This defidt
wil \ 0 f COil rse reduce the amount 0 f: we rk on the Subu tban System in 1')16.
ilJ nt.er Cont to 1 est ima t eS have been ; nc reased because 0 f t.he severe "inter
In \916 Hainten,,'nce on the System ",i \ \ be of a nonnal nature.
to date. surface Treatment wi 11 be requi red on St. George Street (Road
26 _ approxim.'ltelY 0.') miles). As the Gount)' Overhead Costs are considerably
morc in 1916 than in 1915 the Suburban Commision share is increased accordinglY,
completion of Road 10. APproximatel)' $ 25.000 is required to complete >lOr\<
1\1\ funds not used 1.0 maintenance should be used to",ard the
f rom the S to Tho!M s City Limits to County Road 52. Thi s ,,; 1\ leave
approximanl)' $ 69.0(10 to be app1\e'\ against construction of the section of
Road 30 from Road 52 to j'Jst north of Patrerson culvert. Approximately
" 120.000 ove rand a,"ove the commi SS ion \ 5 funds ",ill be . requ i red to comp lete ,
the se.ction.
Februa!:Y I 76
st ~ n1()~SUl\U~RQ.nS CQMM1SS lQR RE1'QR't . - . page 1.
'. It j,lill.1:le nece~sar1' for the comroission to pass a resolution
asSUI\li.n~. the tolld .to the toad aHoj,lance bet,.een concessions }t and }tl
and when the c6mroiSsionB~aget i.s spent pass a Resolution reverting the
.toll.d t.O the jurisdicti.on of the county SO that that section of road ca"
be cOlll1'leted thiS year.
.' ;.1.\ of Vlhich Is Resl'ectfuHY submitted,
, .. .y~i r441 ..' '.
. .. ....... .: . '. '. '. 'nl~.___. ______-.----~----. -
---.- ~
'. R.C, HOORE'. B. Sc.. 1'"Eng.. .' '. .
EtlCINEER 'to 'tIlE S't. 'fl\o}lJ.$ S\rBUJlBAl'lRONl5 COMl'i1S510tl
#
\
ST. THOMAS SUBURBAN ROADS COMMISSIO:t\
STATEMENT OF EXPENDITURES 1975
CONSTRUCTION
1. Road 30 - Radle) Road northerly from St. Thomas City limits
in the Township of Yarmouth, Grading, GrRnu1ar
base:, Pavement, etc.
_2_!~~t.~~l:.~~__
2.' Road 22 - Fairview Avenue Surveys, etc.'
9.31
...---..---------...
I
i ,
3. Land Purchase
_____2I.ZZ~:.~~__
Less Credit Culverts in stock in 1974 and
u~ed in 1975 Construction
28,S32.60 Cr.
TOTAL
$ 171,476.91
MAINTENANCE
1. Bridges and Culverts
165.93
2. Winter Control (1974 - 10,799.95)
9 595.53
_._ .. _ _ _ .I .. _ _ _ .-. _ ~ '..
3. Repairs to Paviements
4 263.07
______1________
5. Grading Maintenance, Gravel Resurfacing And Dust Control
_____Z~Q~?.:g~__
____... _ _ ~'~2:?~__
__..._!~.t!9~.!1'__
4. Surface Treatmlent
6. Roadside Maint.enance including on Road 25
(Wellington ROl~d)
7. Weed and Grass Control
_____1<i!!~.:.9~__
.. _ _ _ _2-.t&}1..: .?J._...
, 920.00
...-..-~-~-.._----
8. Tree Cut~ing
9. Pavement Ma'rki ll1g
10. Signs and Guid1e Rai~s
11. Drainage and Slifeeping
12. Railroad Protelction
13. Traffic Counts
_______1'!!.:99__ .
_______ 9?!+.:!!E__
14. Superintendenc1e, Overhead and Clerical, etc.
....._... _ J..IJ~9.:.;!3__
... _ .. .. .. ... .. .. JJ.! ]) .. _
11 998.53
... ,. _... ... - .., ~ - - -- - - - ...
TOT'AL
$ 57,225.08
, ,
ITEMS NOT SUBSIDIZED BY THE MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTAION AND COMMUNICATIoNS
COlllllittee Memb1er Fees and. EXP!!nses
_ _ _.., _ _ _ .9.1.9...._0_0__
_ _ _......... "_3_0__]_t_
Memberships, Insurance and. Miscellaneous
TOTAL'
$
1.140.71
TOTAL EXPENDITURE BY 5T . THOMAS SUBURBAN ROADS COMMISSION
$ :229.842~70
ST. THOHAS SUBU.l~BAN l"\OADS COMMISS 10:-:
S T A TE}~?-:__QUXPE~m ITUJi ES_19 7?
__ _ _...f~E.~__2___"_'_'H_ __
CALCULATION OF AMOUNT PAYABLE BY CITY OF ST. THOHAS
-. '-.-..'- .-...,.
Construction
M8intenance and Ov4erhea,d
$ 171,476.91
$ _57. 225._0JL
$ 228,701.99
Ministry of Transpc)rtation and COuullunications
Subsidy rate is 73.02% or $ 166,998.19
(o'rigina t'ly estimated at 72. 98~s)
Balance is shared ~equally by County of Elgin and City of St. Thomas.
Amount PaYAble by City 0 f St. ThoITk'1s
$ 30,851.90
Items Not Subsidizled (S-O%of 1140.71)
$
570.35
$ 31,422.25
Les surplus for 1974
8,649.31
Less 3z mill in 197.5 for City of St. Thomas
20J...50.00
Deficit to 1976
$ 2,022.94
?1-,-- 1\\ o~YJ '1'\'J<1~~l0~) .. r, (~l~ c~~S_I_o~\1l)gll'l) (,
Feb rua ry 1 q76
n ra f t 4F l
J:l@'1' Ely:~':.~r cE:....0-().\!.l'J!~l.El\n
PREVIOUS EXPEND IT1JRE
1973- --lQ7~ ---Fin
ES T 11,11\ TE
FOR 1976
---
^ 'tFGORY
~--_.._~--,_._-'#----_...-- ------..-..--
166
2,000
714,
749
BridZes & culverts
6,')37
lO,80n
. Ylinte r Gont iO 1
4,Oh8
Lt,610
Roadside }~intenance
3,737
2,707
Hard Top }~intenance
1. , 1 S9
\,31.4
Loose Top Maintenance
3,140
4,R31
Sa fet,y Devices
s.uperintendence & Overhead
11,573
12,974
TOThL
Const.ruction Road 30
1'OTf,;L CONSTRUCTION f, ~IAINTENl\NCE
ITEMS NOT ELIGIBLE FOR MINISTRY OF TAAISPORTf,;T10N tJID C01<\MUNICl\1'10NS SUBSIDY
------==---- - -~-------~- -.- ~
$
650
committee Members Fees and Expenses
Miscellaneous Expenditu~S & Liability Insurance 150
$ 800
CALCULAT'10N OFA}10UNT PAYABLE BY THE CITY OF ST. THOHAS
--- ---,.-
Februa ry 1976
Draft if 1
Hinistry of Transportation and Communications Subsidy rate i.n 1976 is
estimated at 73.59%.
Total Construction & Haintenance $ 145,000.
Hinistry of Transportation and Connnunications Subsidy estimated at $ 106,~705.50.
Remaining amount of $ 38,294.50 is divided between the City of St. Thomas and
the County of Elgin.
Amount payable by the City of St. Thomas is
$ 19,147.25
Plus 50% of ltems Not Subsidized by the
Hinistry of Transportation and C01'l11'Tlunications
400.00
Estimated cost to the City 0 f St. Thomas
$ 19,547.25
1/2 Hi.ll from the City of St. Thomas will
provide in 1976
$ 21,450.00
Less de fic it from 1975
2,022.94
$ 19, 427 . 06
Deficit to 1976
$ 120.19
".~
it;
.,
COUNTY OF ELGIN
SOLID WASTE BUDGET 1976
f~~
February 1976.
1. County of Elgin's share of London Area Solid Waste Study $ 3,000.
(County share is 11% of 50% of the Cost of Study
and was loriginally estimated at $ 3,400 in total
and $ 663 was paid last year.)
2. Legal Fees
3. Dunwich Township Site Approval
4. Contingencies
TOTAL
2,500.
500.
1,000
$ 7,000.
(
COUNTY CONSTRUCTION
1. Miscellaneous Su rveys
2. Land Purchase
3. Drainage Asse:ssments
4. Provincial Sales Tax Rebate for 1975
5. Reduction in Stock Balance
6. Ownership Costs, etc. on Accounts Receivable
7. Road 2 West L.orne to Rodney, Aldborough Township
8. Road 3 Highway 3 to .Lake Erie, Aldborough Township
Surface Treatment, Relocate Hydro Line
Miscellaneous Drainage
9. Road 3 south Fleming Bridge Southerly Aldborough
Township
Fencing, Grading, Guide Rails, etc.
10. Road 4 Queen Street West, Rodney
Sidewalk and Minor Grading
11. Road' 8 and 13 Dutton
Completion of Curb and Gutter, Paving,
Sidewalk, etc.
12., Road 20 Port Stanl~y
Completion of Paving and Grading
13. Road 36 Highw~y 3 to Sparta, Yarmouth Township
Completion of Grading and Guide Rail,
Top Soil
14. Road 45 Calton to Highway 19, Bayham Township
Miscellaneous D~inage and Fencing
15. Road 34 Belmont
Urban Reconstruction in conjunction with
Ministry of the Env.irorunent.
Sanitary Sewer, work underway.
16. Road 30 Radio Road, Yannouth Township
Gomple:te section. from Road 52 to
north of Patterson Bridge.
Count)/' portion a fter St. Thomas Suburban
Road Committee Expenditure.
17. Road 30 Radio Road, Ya rmouth Township
Completion of work in Concession XII
18. Road 52 Conti.nuation '0 f wo rk between Road 30 and 31
including Kettle Creek Culvert installation
and backfill - some grading
19. Road 5 Plans, Soil Tests, etc.
Replacement 0 f Walker Bridge
TOTAL
(~...lly, [v ~.'~
{1.~ -'\~~
c A~ ~
;It
PROJECT
ESTIMATE LABOUR
$ 3 , 000 "
60,000
25,000
11,000 C redjlt
60,000 C redJlt
12, 000 C red jl t
1,000
8,000
12,000
4,000
70,000
10,000
4,000
3,000
'72,000
120,000
25,000
338,000
12,000
$ 684,000
ASPHALT RESURFACING,
. .
, PRELIMINARY ANlD TENTATIVE ESTIMATES
(a) Road 42 -from Highway 73 to Road, 40 (single Ii ft)
Asph~llt Tender $ 30,000 - Project $ 35,000
(b) Road 19 - Highll78Y 3 to Southwold Station
AsP~11 t Tende r $ 115,000 - Project 155,000
Including Ditching, Granular Base, etc.
I
!
I
1
f .
(c) Road 34 M.C.L. - Limit of Village of Belmont to
Kettle Creek bridge
Asphsllt Tender $ 14,000 - Project $ 18,000
County of Elgin portion 50%
9,000
(d) Road 45 - East River Road to Top of East Hill
Kettle Creek Culvert
Asph~llt tender including asphalt curb $ 22,000
ProjE~ct including Granular Padding
30,000
(e) Road 45 - High~78Y 4 to Road 22
Asp~Llt Tender $ 45,000
Project
50,000
or
(f) Road 46 - Oxford County Line to Corinth
Asphc;ll t Tender $ 38,000
Project
48,000
TOTAL
$ 279,000 i
OTHER WORK
(1) Road 16 - (8) Road 14 to Willey's Side Road
Asphalt Tender $ 141,000 - Project 160,000
(b) "VIii ley' s Side Road to Road 8
Asphalt Tender $ 134,000 - Project 145,000
(II) Road 45 - Road 22 to Ro~d 28
Asph~llt Tender $ 35,000 - Project 44,000
(III) Road 45 - Road 28 to Road 36
Asphn1t Tender $ 126,000 - Project 145,000
1976 BUDGET
~QUIPMENT AND GRANULAR PITS
Draft /1 1
February 20, 1976
New Snow Plow Tlmck# and Box $ 30,000
Plo~ Wing, Harness, etc. 8,000
Trade Grader
(Grader 1/13, 1964 Galton or Grader #11, 1959 Adams) 45,000
Trade TI'8ctor Il5, 1968 Model 350 John Deere Bulldozer 16,000
Trade 1963 Mich1.gan Loader for used Loader Demonstrator 36,000
Whitney Gtavel Pit 33,000
$ 168,000
c:.ONSTRUCTION ON ST. THOMAS SUBURBAN ROAD~
Total Available Money
$ 94,000
Road 30 - (a) fl:'Om St. Thomas north limits to
BClLker Penhale Drain Crossing 25,000
Road 30- (b) Baker Penhale Drain Crossing to
Road between Concession X and XI 69,000
$ 94,000
Remainder of Road 30 (b) to County Construction
Budget (1e $ 120,000).
I
f:
COONTY OFlLOIN< ROAD DEPARTMENT.. 197~ BU?.9ET
:COUNTY MAINTEN.MCE
t
I
o PEP,,^TI;()~
-,~-
Bridges' andCu'lvf1rts
WinterCont ro1
Hot Mix' A~phal t Resu'rfacing
I
Su rfa:c:e T r.ea tment
Cravel Rp.surfactng
Repa i rs to ,Pavements
H8 intenance 0 fGravelRoads
Roa d sid eMai n terta nee.
Duc;t Control
Gra 5S Cutting
Weed .Spt'aying
Tree Cutting
Pavement Ma rk i ng
Gu i d~ Ra i1
S 'i en s
Dn-linage
Sweeping
r
Ii
J
~
f
~
t
I
I
I
Tree Plant tng,
Ra i 1 TOad Protection
D ra i nCl ee As se ~ srnent 5~
(Ha i ntena nc e)
I
I
I
I
1973
34,850
72,825
28,13~
14,200
2~,375
'14,393
14,723
22.3f)7
16.a94
4,870
11,242
14,7/+3
2,661
20,383
19,406
642
12,817
323,472
1974
5,398
175,688
, 12,901
35,489
15,095
43,170
12,266
13,338
30,183
1.7,625
4, 7 c; g
39,22<)
15,932
2,408
13~8g9
17,565
3,975
403
lh, g 12
1 , 000
4H 2 , 1 4/~
Draft 1; 1
February 1976
1()75
16,9.03
139, 358
53,767
86,042
40,637
11,84~
17,129
40,100
1 5, 71 7
7,o6Q
21 ,22/..
1 7 , 9 !+6
4,668
16,428
22,SQ8
10,110
367
19,095
278
547,873
1976 197h
BUDG ET LABOUR
.-....--..---- --..
40,0004
250,000
65,000
50,000
45,000
1/-1,,000
1-8,000
52,000
15,000
22,000
21,000
5,000
18,OOOJ
20,000
12,000
22,0001
1,000
670,000
~!9.~.'!)j.t~1...:-1!7f Y-\lP9.f:r
9.tE~
D ra f t ~~ \
r e b 1"\.U'\ 't"1 1 C) 16
.. .. 1974 1975 . 1<)7t'- \97(,
C~..tEG01t'! .. . · ).973 . tS't1H,\TE LA!loUR_.
~~-:------~~----
45,000
29.542 32,139 37 ,206
32,931 44,200 54,089
358 1,500 ......-
'8, 2B 3 5, 974- 4,144
1,54e. 7,385 10,686
.. '801 167 932
2,949 '2. ,207 1,719
41 ,746 56,732 51 ~853
21,054- 20,336 16,4~0
1.11 840 1,175
2,72B 2, \41 2,576
46q 941 1,102
2\ , /.61 2\,018 24,807
40 \44 36
10,504 23,3'25 2..51'1
4,508 ,. S, 10~ 8,222
29 , 7 ,7 31,731 34, i2B
5,832 B , 150 \0,601
11,8\8~. 33,348~ 36,767~
su!'erlntandence
Ga ..:ageS
.nlite st8tiO~ Pit 1t.~~.
'tools
MiSC. 'Re1?ait's
\o\edica\
'RadiO
'\\0 \. id~"JS "With'P..)' ,
Sic~ 'Benefits
~ee.ds Studj1lJpdate,
'tt'3 ffic CourttS
'tnininB Cou-rses
CleT1.ca1
-p.-rmit~
l~s~Y8nee {or SubsidY
Office
Pens 'ion
\lneml' \o:""en t Insu ranee
\.0,2B1
13,043
Qnttl rio\\e& 1 t h 1 nsu Y8 nee
IInd 1'>l~e C ""ss Plans
DisanilitY Ins~ranee Plan
---
^ecounts Reeei~able creditS
15,694
4,607
~
'2.2<l,693
----
}~ehinery QNernead
'2.62,384
48,000
1,000
3,000
12,000 .
1,000
2,000
. 70,000
2l~, 000
\,000
3,000
1,000
26,000
19,000
.9,000
l\-O ,000
14~OOO
13,672
17,000
5,000
q , OOOs:.~
12,941~ 5,000
-------------(
232,953 337,000
SUMMARY
St. Thomas Suburban Roads Commission Construction
t. Thomas Suburban Roads Maintenance & Overhead
:ounty Road and Bridges Maintenance
County Ove rhead
New Machinery and Gravel Pits
Asphalt Resurfacing
Urban Rebates
County Road Construction
TOTAL
Total Expenditure
Less: Contribution of St. Thomas to St. Thomas
Suburban Roads Commission <effective
after 1975 deficit)
Less: Ministry of Transportation and
Communications Subsidy'
County Road Levy
1975
NEEDS STIJDY 1976
UPDATE BUDGET
Included In 94,000
County Const.
62,.000 51,000
646,000 670;000
367,000 337,000
119,000 168,000
279,000 279,000
38,000 38,000
810,000 684,000
(including
subsidy)
$ 2,321,000 $ 2,321,000
$ 2,321,000
19,000
1,699,000
$ 603,000 (In 1975 it was
$,581,000)
COUNTY OF ELGIN
It/U ~ rt~
~
ROAD COMMITTEE REPORT
FIRST REPORT
FEBRUAHY SESSION
197 6
"
i.
i:
\
I:
[: ,
~
Ii
~
~;
~
r
~.
TO THE WARDEN AND MEMBERS OF
ELGIN COUNTY COUNCIL.
YOUR ROAD COMMITTEE REPORTS AS FOLLOWS:
,
f:
l
t
I,
!'
~:
t.
t
i
I: .
1. Winter Control in the past six weeks has been extremely
heavy with approximately $155,000 being spent to date.
(Expenditure in total year of 1975 was approximately
$140,000.) In addition a number of major repairs have
been made to County equipment that would not have been
necessary in a normal winter. Some items of equipment
that would ordinarily have been replaced in 1977 will
\
also likely have to be replaced this year.
All Of Which Is Respectfully' Submitted,
CHAIRMAN ..
ST. Tl:10l-1AS, ONTARIO.
FEBRUARY 11, 1976.
"Pa.ge 1
Building on February 11 at 10,00 a.m. All members present except
T1:lE cOUNtY 01' ELGIN ROl\D COMMItTEE MEt at tbe Municipal
Reeve Wilson and Deputy Reeve Glover. Also present R. Greenley,
Ministry of transportation and comrounications.
approved. Mr. Jobn Bray and Mr. Jim Janse of tbe Ministry of tbe
tHE MiNUtES 01' DECEMBER 10 and JANUARY 14 ~re read: and
Environment joined tbe meeting. the Warden, Chairman and Engineer
reported on recent developments in Solid Waste including'
1. Agreement "ntb the St. 'Iboroas Sanitary Collection Service Ltd.
to have the Environmental Board Rearing on the'IownsbiP of
Dun"nch Site scbeduled for February 12 adjOurned.
2. that the St. Thoroas Sanitary Collection Service Ltd. bad
submitted a price per ton for disposal and ~re "nlling to
negotiate termS and conditions for disposal.
THE ENGINEER pRESENTED THE 1\.'I'I/\,CRED MAtERIAL being a summary
of termS, prices and conditions sUgge5ted by the St. ThomaS Sanitary
Collection Service Ltd. on February 6 at a meeting at the Ministry of
tbe Environment, London, attended by Warden Scbafer, and Reeves
Liebner and Cook.
and Mr. A. c. Wright on February 10 for approxiroatelY 2 bours to
T1:lE ENGINEER REl'OJrrED T1:lAT RE Hl\D MET with Mr. R. McCaig
site and negotiating "nth the St. ThomaS Sanitary collection service
considerable diSCUssion on the merits of acquiring a landfill
expand on the material.
Ltd. fo11o't;~ed.
ST. THOMAS, ONTARIO.
FEBRUARY 11:~ 1976.
Page 2
THE MEETING ADJOURNED FOR DINNER.
AFTER DISCUSSION FOLLOWING DINNER
ltHOVED BY:
M. A. SCHAFER
SECONDED BY: G. D. SIHPSON
THAT A COMHITTEE BE APPOINTED TO MEET WITH REPRESENTATIVES
OF THE ST. THOMAS SANITARY COLLECTION SERVICE LTD. TO
NEGOTIATE WITH THEM A PRICE FOR DISPOSAL IF POSSIBLE, A
PURCHASE AND CONDITIONS FOR THE PROPERTY IF POSSIBL]~ AND
THAT THE SAME COMHITTEE CONS IDER THE REQUEST OF THE
TOWNSHIP OF SOUTHWOLD IN THEIR NEGOTIATIONS.
CARRIED"
'2MOVEIl BY:
L. R. CARROLL
SECONDED BY: G. W. MONTEITH
THAT WE INSTRUCT THE COUNTY SOLICITOR TO PREPARE THE
COUNTY'S CASE FOR THE COUNTytS APPLICATION FOR THE
DUNWICH TOWNSHIP SITE AS A COUNTY TEMPORARY WASTE DISPOSAL
SITE.
CARRIED"
. nMOVED BY: G. D. SIMPSON
SECONDED BY: L. R. CARROLL
THAT THE FOLLOWING BE APPOINTED 1AS A COMMITTEE TO NEGOTIATE
WITH THE ST. THOMAS SANITARY COLLECTION SERVICE LTD., THE
COUNTY SOLICITOR, THE ENGINEER, THE WARDEN AND CHAIRMAN.
CARRIED"
ST. THOMAS, ONI' ARlO.
FEBRUARY 11, 1976.
Pa ge 3
ME~ssrs. Bray and Janse left the meet:f.ng.
THE MINUTES OF JANUARY 21 WERE READ AND APPROVED.
THE ENGINEER REPORTED ON THE WORK to date as Dollows:
1., Winter Control had been extremely heavy "t'lith approximately
$ 140,000 being expended to date.
Equipment failures included motors on Truck # 55 and Michigan
Loader.
Other equipment was showing the strain and repairs were heavy.
2. 5 men (Category I) had been laid off until weather conditions
improved, as it was virtually impossible to cut trees because
of the deep snow.
3. Some sign work was under way.
4. Mr. & Mrs. Whitney had promised an answer by Friday .as to
whether or not they would accept the County's offer for the
purchase of a portion of their property.
5., Although a meeting had been held with the Lower Thames Valley
Conservation Authority no further word has been received from
them regarding the Walker Bridge or the Crane Property.
6., Insurance Renewals would be discussed with Lyle Wells of
Frank Cowan Co. early next week in hopes that a recommendation
for reducing premium costs could be made.
ttHOVED BY:
G. W. MONTEITH
SECONDED BY:
M. A. SCHAFER
THAT THE FOLLOWING PAYLISTS BE APPROVED FOR PAYMENT
PAYLIST 1F 4 -
PAYLIST IF 5 -
PAYLIST IF 6 -
PAYLIST 1J: 7
PAYLIST 1ft 8 -
AMOUNTING TO $
AMOUNTING TO $
AMOUNTING TO $
AMOUNTING TO $
AMOUNTING TO $
36,106.30
390.96
529.04
33,490.36
65,858.37
CARRIEDtl
ST. TROMAS, ONT1\RIO.
'FEBRU !\RY 11:, 1976.
Page 4
CORRESPONDENCE W~ READ
Re Ontario Good Roads Association convention.
1.
~otice from the Ontario Municipal Board re an appeal from
decision of County Land Division Committee re Lot 22
2.
Concession 11 Bayham.
3. Township of southwold stating they were not in favour of
a Parking Ban on Road 16 and Road 20 in Fingal and requesting
a 4 foot stop sign on Road 20 south of Road 16. The Committee
were agreeable to the erection 0 f the sign if there 1;W.S
su fficient room.
4. Township of southWOld agreeing with the county'proposals for
sale of part of Lot 7 Concession V and SUggesting the lots be
sold by tender for the period of several years. The Engineer
waS instructed to submit the proposal to t~in Planning
~ for their approval.
5. From the Structural Engineer of the Ministry of Transportation
and communications regarding reports on the WalkerI sand
Middlemiss Bridges agreeing that work was necessary that
replacement should be avoided if possible as it would likely
cost about $ 1,000,000 per bridge.
6. Frank Cowan Co. regarding claim by Donald GraS.
7. Mrs. W. G. Lyle regarding damage to mailbOX. The Engineer
was instructed to write her and explain that under the
circumstances of an extremely heaV)' snowfall the County
could not be held liable for repairs.
8. Reg Esseltine stating he would retire when his holidaY
time ran out.
ST. TROMAS, O~TARI0.
FEBRUARY 11, 1976.
Pa.ge 5
"MOVED BY:
L. R. CARROLL
SECO~DED BY:
TUAT "\IE MAKE A CONTRIBUTION 01' $ 100 TO REGINJ>Jll ESSELTlNE
UPON RIS RETIREMENT.
G. D. SlMpSO~
CARRIED"
Agreement bet~en the Mini st ry 0 f T ranspo rta t ion;:Jl,nd Cotl1ltlUnica t ions
CO~PONDENCE WAS :READ FROM H. GREENLEY regarding
and the Village of Port Stanley in ~ich the Village agreed to
assume (in 1966) that portion of present HighwaY 4 west of County
Road 20. The Engineer waS requested to assist the Village and to
approa ch the Minist ry 0 f T ra nspo rta t ion and C otl1ltlUnica t ion s to make
representations that the Road should not be reverted to the
Villa.ge.
MR. H. GREENLEY p,ND MR. Cl\.VEllLY left the meeting.
TUE WGINEER PRESENTED TUE ATTACHED explanation of
method used by the Ministry of TransportatiOn and cotl1ltlUnications
in ascertaining the method of$ubsidY Allocations.
shortly but because of the heaVY winter expenditures, tree planting
TUE ENGINEER STATED 'IRAT Ii> BUDGET would be available
and weed spraying would be deleted and graSS and weed cutting
curtailed. Other economies would also likely be required if winter
CQntrol costs rose tn1.lch I!\Ore.
"MOVED BY:
L. R. CARROLL
5EC.QNDRD ::1~Y :
TUAT WE ADJOIllU'l TO MA.>RCR 3 AT 10:00 A.M. OR TO TUE CALL 01'
G. W. MONTEITH
TUE CllAIP..MAN.
CARRIED"
(,,,)
,.< ()w.."J,..
uJ..JI'
; V\ l/./'r<~
.~ \~I
.
PRO pQS ED OCTOBER AC REEHEl!.1' WI TH THE ,TOWNS 1l1J:. 0 F..s.91JT.!i.W.Q.~
.,:
Provides for -
St. Thomas Sanitary Collectton Services Limited to -
1. Provide container $ 75 per week
$ 3900.
2. Free disposal for Southwold.
$ 93'19.
population 4245 @ estimateQ. cost of 2.20 per .capita
3. 14<;. per capita 0 f those Hunicipa Ii ties
$ 7649 per annum
using site = ~4,639 x 14C -
(1 974 f i. gu re s )
Townshtp of Southwold to 111lprove and surface treat road to east to
Hir,lMay 4 and the St. Thomas Sanitary CollectioP Servic.es Limited to
provide a portion of the costs.
St. ThomaS Sanitary Collection Services Limited Proposal Ipc.luded ·
2. e 3 r 1...Y..-
(a) Cost of Road $ 60,000 Amortized over 10 years
$ 9,764
9,339
(h) Free Disposal
7 ,6/+9
(c) 14C per Capita
3,900
(d) Contniner
$ 30,652 per year
Cost per ton (50,000 ton) per annum
61.3 cents.
42
cent s.
Without Road Costs
.
~:'
. NEW REQUEST OF SOUTHWOLD I JANUARY/76
~. Access road from west (Road 19) to site to be
paid for by McCaig. Estimated cost $ 96.,000
(3 mt 1es further haul)
2. Free Waste Disposal privileges for Southwold Township.
3. Container at site.
4. Royalty of $ 10,000 per year to Southwold.
5. Application Fee of $ 10,000.
6. Must take: waste from the County 0 f Elgin, Township 0 f Delawa re
and Westminster and Industrial Contract.
Estimated total waste per year 50,000 tons.
\
Cost per vear - Initial Costs Amortized over 10 years.
($ lO,OQO borrowed over 10 years @ 10io = 16,274 per year)
Road costs (100,000)
16,274 per yea r
9,339
10,000
1,627 (if all the fee used by the Township)
3,900
Waste Disposal Privileges
Royalty
Application Fee
Container
41~140
on 50,000 ton = 82.2.cents / eon.
Without Roadway Costs = 50 cents t ton.
11
"t'
COUNTY OF ELcn;, ROAD D EPARTNENT
Tenns and Conditions of offer of Febn1ary 6/73 of St. Thomas Sanitrtry
Collection Services Limited to the County of Elgin for a disposal price.
1. Nomograph fonns a basis for discussion and if a pric(\ per ton is
agreed upon a Step-Unit price will be used rather than the straieht
1 ine nomograph.
2. Terms 0 f Cant rac t
- S ta rt in g whe h use 0 f s j t e be r, ins.
- Duration for life of site.
Agreement to be Regi.stered on Title.
3. Any Nunicipality has the right to accept a tonnage price or a per
capita price using Step-Unit price.
\.
- Hinimum contract period shall be 5 years for 1st contract - options
3 - 5 years (negotiable).
- After expirary of this tem the Municipality has option of
Opting out or changing from per carlita to tonnage 0r vice-versa.
- r f Nu n i c:i pa 1 i t Y 0 P t ~~ 0 u t - i t ma y 0 P tin a ga in a tan y t i Tn e .
L~. Cost per capita for Residential Pickup is defined as number of people
:in the Hunicipality as defined by the Intest Provinci.al Census other
t ha n the i nha b ita n t s 0 f
a) St. Thomas Elgin General Hospital, Chronic Unit.
b) Province of Ontario St. Thomas Psychiatric Hospital.
c) Home for Aged - Valleyvie\v, Elgin Hanor and Aylmer.
d) Ontario Police College.
The population on January 1 in any year shall be the population for the
whole year and shall be the [latest population figure from the F'rovincial
Hinistry of Revenue Census.
5. Price per ton shall be price for disposal of waste from waste picked
up by a hauler under Contract to a Municipality and shall include any
material called for.under the MuniCipality's contract. It shall ai.so
include any material hauled by the MuniCipality's vehicles or the
l1unicipa.1ity's Agents on behalf of the Municipality.,
.,;
Pa't;e 2
6.
f 1 id ",ast.e ent.ering the Vla5t.c pi sposa"\
ln ca I cella t. inS the amount o. SO . ..'
a~ea the follo~ns shall be considered -
.' ~.1 \ lled b" haulers under contract to all,! }\uniCipa lit'!'
Al I Hunl.Cl.pal "aste 1a\ J'
l H .' lit" of its ane~s including
All Vlaste hauled di~ect.l'! b'! tIe unl.Cl.pa . J ~
~ll Vlaste hauled f~om any lndust~ial o~ commercial organization
including any material to be ~eclaimed.
The follo~ng shall not be included -
Ea~th hauled fo~ cover material o~ t.o" soil.
Hateda I hauled fo r road bond i.ns inc luoi ng founnJ:'! sand fro!l\
SOUt\IY1O \.d 'to\'tC\ship.
a)
b "e~ tile f~o!l\ Canada Vit~ifien.
Can ron, ro~" .
p. c~edit fo~ any material sold as reclai!l\ed.
b)
c)
II I t inrrease \oIOuld be for
1916 to be aO)U .,t.ed a nnll3 y. s ..'
based ~~b~J! ~ "!. 1.. present ~ate.
December 75
7 .
Dominion Bu~eau of StatistiCS claUse
pri ce 1.5 fo r
J a '0.\.13 r'Y 1 9 7 7
3.
P . eS to be effective for laonfill site
rl.C'
b r:fect1' ve \4\'\en onened.
sOllth\olOld Site onl'! to e e'" r
. t.el" the lOth of month follo",ing.
l'ayments monthlY at a?"ro1<1.roaJ
C).
b . _ p. n~ice shall be esti.mated fo~ the ye3r
1 f on a tOnnage as's r .
. d" t!l\eot in estiroate afte~ 6 months and any
and is subJect to an a JUs
. f nd to be paid by Yebrua~y 10
difference payable at end'o yea~ a
10.
ll.
T.1 . \ U "ls and SuU1ll1l\ J:'! sheets to be sent to Hunic i"a 1.i ties and all
\'le1g'\ 1)'l.1-
~'ed and subject to l-hlnicipa1. audit.
copies to be preseLV
either \-laY.
..,
1>'~
11. l\oll~s of entJ:'! ·
Type of ~ehic1e al10~d.
{
"
\
\3.
. (!ite M:a.te~ial to be cha~ged at sa!l\e Disposal. p~ice - Division
cont3.1.'O.er '"
. .' 1. Cost to be a sub ject 0 f Munici"a1. ,.g~eement.
of containe~ sl.t.e Dl.Sposa
Page 3
14. Hauler's vehicles shall be such as provided by the spec~ fic.ation of
,,:, the Municipality, however any vehicle hauling any l11Plterinls th81t are
such that they will easily blow off the load shall be enclosed or
ta rped.
.
",;
,
~~~~
~3'T'~~~~
Februa r:y l', 1.976.
Ext.ra cost over St. Thomas Sanitat)' collection Services Limited that
would be incurred by St. Thomas Sanua t)' Collection services Lim' ted
because 0 f SouthWO ld To.,nsni p requests.
1975 October Proposal of St. Thomas Sanitary Collection services Limited
without road costS 42e tOn (15e capita)
with road costS 61e tOn (22c capita)'
January 1976 Request of southwold 'township
"n.thout road costS Sac ton (18e capita)
with road costs 82.2e ton OOe capita)
\
(ie road to the west)
population of County seI"'led by St. ThomaS Sanitary Collection services
Limited other thal\ the Township 0 f Southwo 1 d is 28, 39B (1974)
$ 60,203
@ 2.12 per person
(50.000 _ 55,~0 ton per year)
Estimate weight 0 f SO lid waste from this a rea
using MacLaren Formula .365 ~ 10,365 ton @ $ 5.81 per ton
probablY closer to BODO tOn @ 5.81
(Difference $ 13,740)
To above must be added southwold CostS
11sing B,OOO tOn in 1976 theSe become
october Proposal @ 42c 3,360
@ 61<;- 4,880
January proposal @ sOe 4,000
@ B2~ 6,560
60,220
46,480
I,.ANDFILL COSTS USING HACLAREN COST CURVE
"l;
AND OWNERSHIP COSTS
Investment Costs for $ 700,000 for 10 years (9 10% is $ 16,274 per yea r per
thousand dollars or $ 113,918 per year.
Mac La ren t;J:?;~ $~ tS'.e L
Annual Cost (15%) Plus =~~~'. ~~."~
Tonnage Cu rve Plus % Ownershiq "a~_! .lee ~1
37,500 3.10 3.57 3.04 6.61. 5.95
50,000 2.710 3.11 2.28 5.39 5.83
62,500 2.55 2.93 1.82 4.75 5.72
75,000 2.40 2.76 1.52 4.28 5.60
87,500 2.17 2.50 1.30 3.80 5.48
To the total price would have to be added some measure 0 f pro fit for the
private ~perator.
\
3
Feb 1"11;1 ry 1 976
TO THE CHAIRNAN Al'ID HEMBEHS OF THE COUNTY OF ELGIN ROAD COHHITTEE
Repo rt on Road Expendi tu res for 1976
This report is a review of the methods used by the Hinistry
of Transportation and Communications to arrive at our Subsidy Allocations
for 1976 and the method of calculating the County Road Rate.
In 1973 the Mini st ry 0 f Transporta t ion and Communica tions
adopted a policy of a single subsidy rate (other than Drainage Assessments
in some years or Urban Rebates) for Counti.es and Regions. This single
system repl;lced the old system which is sti II used for TO'tIDShips and
Vi llages 0 f 50010 Subsidy on Roads, 8m~ Subsidy on Bridges and 100% Subsidy
on Development Roads (Direct Aid).
One 0 f the biggest assets () f the new system was that the
\
bookkeeping nn County work was to be s'implj fied (actually this had
occu rred).
The Ninistry of Transportation and Cormnunications has adopted
a policy of allocatinr. subsidy funds based on proven needs and of setting
a desirable spending allocation. An expenditure over the desirable
expenditure allocation will not be subsidized and any spending under the
allocation ,..rill result in loss of subsidy at the maximum subsidy rate
(8 pp roxir:la te 1 y 91"/0).
Til,e Subsidy is calculated by the Hinistry of Transportation and
Communicati.ons matching the amount of money that the County would raise
at 1.25 mills on its Provincial Equalized Assessment plus subsidy at 91%
on the dollar for any of the desirable expenditure allocation in e)~cess of
the amount subsidized at 5001.:. (matching grant). (See attached calculations.)
In 1975 the Subsidy Rate '-las 73.02% (other than Urban Rebates'
and Drainage Assessments) whereas in 1974 i.t was 67.7. The rate for 1975
is estimated at 73.5870 (other than Urban Rebates).
Pn ~',e ?
",""mVl'" (\1' 'ttlE C(\11\1't'1 01' F.LCW \;01\1) COHVl'nEY>
'to 'f\',E C\\p.1RW>l' "NIl ,',c.. ",.' '" .' .
!g,O~~.@~~:'PJ!Il-~1'3_!9~).a].6,- - - " " "
_ .sel.,!'~SLJ,:'-7!'.- > -"
'. ' the tota \ "f ]:\"e'\s ,,t10,,",,,
'the deS i rah \ e spendi nI; a lloca t 1-0n 1.5 .
" ~ nn r"ved b) the
, ' (I97S) tleeds StudY upuatC as a,,> . '
pTeceed1-n! years > -
1) ES 1MBLE S 1'1';}.'1l }t,C --,,~E~
;.;..--::..._,-'-- .-- ---.-:.---
in the
. d coromuniC(\t10ns.
l-\in i st. r) 0 t 't ransport.at.1-on an .
'the t.ot.al allocatiOn \5
hsphalt. ~surfRCln&
divided intO t.hree part.s.
(<:1)
Const 1....~\ct. ion
(0 )
(c) Fixed Cost.s.
(a)
1 I... {:". . ),".e'''t 0 ~ ...; I I hec"me de f ic lent. j n t. he
, 0 t." ,,0,1" " ,~ . .
1\riM;es "h1C\' aTe pre>.en > .
t 'o,.,.e.' a1"d llSt>ed
'd 't,.e ,\eflCiencie5 are ca..a' o' .
co",1M. eve year perl0' "..'
.; " ,.d ('.Ol11,mlnicat. ions cd t.eria.
.' . '" 'ctr" of 1ronso"rtB"'0 a'
RCCoro,n" t.o ',1.tl". ) ,
~~
, > ',,' _ he cn stS ,,\ t.ho 5e Roa,is al1d
hpproved const.ruct.1on (,~st, are t.
..' ""'o~'e..,..,(:r,ts S1..\c\\ a <; D'ra.inage
" C' . .t- ., rC snOt. l.rn? c v ",,' ..
" "..\' 1"'~ C0l1st.roct,1.0n 05',5 a . ,.
!\' 50 ,no' uue<>" >.'
, ~.., d un to t.olerable st.andard5.
\ ; ~ SceUOn 0' rca . I' "
C ..to et,c. nececcary to ,r.I1., a "
,os''""
\ cO.....1"'~\nicatiOi.\S
. ~,n ( 1IU.".... '
. . < 1 ,,^"500,taOO" a.
1\.~' \.t'r~' 0\ .n '
, ed of. ,>,,\0> ~ ,. .
1he Cost s a ,e .1aS.' . . , they "c're 1-11
f nS t r,\C t \ n 1>. as
\ costS 0 . CO
,. ..,resent t\€..... .
\ CD st. S "," e h rei. .) 1 na srn\.lC \1 a. s
a\1orove( , · , ry fj ve y"a T'" <
" \5 revIewed abauL eve " ·
("'P\' c.()<t ltl<>eJ< . ' . 11.'t1eS uo
IQ73. "n5'" ' ' or t.he HUl\lC1pll' '
......r\ ('~,_<,,\n1.ca.tlOns
" 1-1111 is t. 1"1 0 f 't ra ,,,po Tt.a t i 0 11 a "v .,v""'~
t ' . e ,,' . . ' f . .' n e r10 d
\ t.e \1 the constr'Jct.lon 1-'" a l\1e year c
nO t. have enou?,\' mol1ey t.c> com" e a
) f t\'e iNO 'f\<. to be
. ' (. I. (.,<li (rec\nc -\ n ,> \)3 \ 3. nee () -- . "
. \-.. ect1'\1C' 0' y.1)/' ' t.>
a const. ruet ,0n ov J ,.,' . .'
, 1his e Ullls 1','1. per yeaT (previOUS
d . n <) "e r neriO{~ ha<' bcen sct.. . <1
coml,\cte j. a ' ,a c .,
" ~ C ~,~'C"t.l0tlS objectIve "llS 4)~ or
f ".. ...-t<"l t 10n C\f>.U,OU\ltl....11 ~ 0.
to 197h l'\in'5tn 0 ,ranspo, n"
a 9'1, rat.e per yellr).
(\1 )
b".&.ll.'5_~<;..s.~5j}.s5.Ej;
~ _" tP(\ rost.s "f roads t.n"~ a ,e
3. 5 ~;) I) C u:\. . J
, . 1he roads "\ iste"" are
,., ~ \" ,I", !r' C 3 Del 'IN. <i th5.
~ ',,3 ,...1". . .,\::> .
(1)
dO hould be covered "it.h
Double surface 'treat.ment. Rea " s
" < Uot. 1-\iJ< itl t.he I', to 10 year period
three 1.DC1les o.t
. tld earlier if severe b~eaku\l occurs.
aft.er cotlst.ruct.,on a
. _ f',rC ",rear ner.1.od.
c. . d l'V'\ the com1,n~"1 '\ v" T' t'
res\.) r l(1 ce. " '
1he p,o~ramroe provides t.hat.:
TO THE CHAIRHAN AND HEtffiERS OF COUNTY OF ELGIN ROAD cnH~'~T1'TEE
PagE' 3
REPORT ON ROP.D EXPE~IDITURES FOR 1976
Feb ry a rY.J}..!.2-._
(b) _~~h9..L~__ Resu rfaf ing (cont inued)
(2) Hulch Roads and Hot Hi.x Roads should be covered in the
1 ') to 20 yea r per i 0 d aft e r con s true t i 0 .
(3) Hot Mi.x Roads of 1. 1/2 to 2 inches in depth should bl?'
covered as soon as possible to stop breakup (elephant
t racki ng).
InCllsmuch as the Hinistry of Transportation and Comrnunicati.ons
does no t havE~ enough money to, comp 1 et e a 11 the rest! rfac i ng neces sa ry
they have set: an objective of 7C,o;o of this work in the five year period
ora yea rly object ive 0 f 15"/0.
(c) Fixed Costs
ThE~se costs incltl.de Haintenance of Roads and Bridges on the
Countv and St. Thomas Stlburhan Road Commission Road System, Overhead
Charges, Nachjnery Replacement, Building Tmprovements, and Purchase of
Gra\rel Pits, etc. A tentative 1976 Budget (Hainten~n1(.::e and Overhead
r.ha1~ges) was required in 197') as '[.Jas a l1achinery Replacem0nt Schedule for
five years.
111 i s '''a s
r('vie~,:red by the !'1:inistry of Transportation .1nd
r. 0 mmu n i (' at j () n san d aft (' r a L re a t de a 1 0 f d i S C U S s ion a p p rr" v e din j t s
en tire t y .
01,~r 1976 Spending Allocation is as follovls:
Construction ~~'Z, of Needs of S lO,l?h,OOO
$
,ql0,OOO
Asphalt HcsllrfaclnL; 15'%, of Needs of S 1 ,)~63,ono
$
279,000
~~'dntenanre Costs, County rHld St. Thomas Subur'ban Roads ComrTli,ssion
Roa d s 6( Bri cl ges
$
691,000
Overhead Costs County and St. Thonas Suburban Roads Commission
$
384,000
:~eH i"lachi.nery ex. Gravel Pits
$
119.000
Total Spending Allocation
$ 2,283,000
'to 1:\lE C1U>.lR~ NID MF1'\1\ERS or COIWT'l or ELGIN ROW COl~\1T'1'EE - 1'aCe I,
. . 7 L r eb rua Dc.J .'l.l.fc--
REPORT ot~ El{pE~~~l1-~---'----------
~-:;:...-- _.~~. ~
The Hinl st rJ 0 f 'transportation and communica t. ionS haS set a
provincial E<l.ualized II.ssessroent of the countY of El&In for grant. p\)11'Oses
to l^7~ ot c 362 000 000) '1'his fi~\re
in 1916 at. 368 roillion dollars ,1n 7 J 1 ~aS" ' ,. .' .
haS been obt.alned by applying a growth fact.or on the 1969 provincial
o d t nd "" 11 " roba b 1 Y conti nU e unt i1 the P rovi nce getS
E<l.ua11ze II.Ssessroen, a . r
n . -me The Calculat.ion of provincial subsidY
a ~~,able Re_II.Ssessroent <ro.gra""" ·
IS sho~ attaChed and is set at. '? 1,699,000.
U l &or ur.inaoe II.ssessroents are not available
SUl'pleroentarJ uy_ua~s L u D
d \ costS, ronst be included in t.he construct.ion I\.llocat1on.
an t1eSe
$ 2,233,000
(A)
\.976 U rba\'\ Rebates
~.~l9!2
$ 2,321,000
Su~ ry
1916 Spending l\.llocat.i.on
(B) HiniStrJ of Transportation and
Cot<<l'Unlca t ions Snb s Idy
\
1,699,000
~ Hill contri.bution of St. ThomaS
to Suburban Roads (lesS deficit froro
1915 and Iteros Not for snbsidY)
18,800
~J1Q.
$ 2,321,000
Count'Y Road 'Le"'Y
. . d C __, IC tions has indicated
'the Hinist rJ 0 f 'transporta t10n an o..."_n a
n fino nd Ne" MachinerJ should be reasonablY
that. l\.llocations for "esur aC "a
_h" _,. nOU gh i f they are inC rea sed the 1\\0 n i es ",,11
(Connty Road ~evy in 1975 "as'? 581,000)
spent on theSe ca tegO p~~ ". -..
f-n- other }~intenance and construction alUOunts. }\ajor
ha"e to corne .\-....d..
o \ ld ISO be snent on itetnS that the allocations
maintenance allocat10n s\ou, a <
\~re roade for (e>taroples, Gravel Resu rfac ing and Surface 'treatroent) if at
all possible after ~inter control costS are roet.
11.11 Of Which Is Rest'ectfull'f Submitted.
~~
. Sc., 1'... Eng., ·
OAD S1JpERIN'tENDE1:lT.
COUNTY OF
ELG IN
4. CALCULATION OF GRANT UNDER UPPER TIER PROGRAM
STEP 1
Approved Expenditure on Roads and
B ridges to, which Grant Applies (Item I)
STEP 2 County Effort of 1.25 Mills on Total
County Assessment (Item F)
1.25 x Item F :: 1. 25 x $36A,oon,OOo
1000 1000
= $
460,000
Plus Sep. Urban Contribution at O. 5 Mills
0.5xItemG==0.5x $ t~2.900 $
1000 -Il!' 1000
Total Local Effort at 1. 25 Mills
STEP 3 Road Effort at 1. 25 Mills equals the
total Local Effort in Step 2 plus an
equivalent amount of grant
2xStep2::2x$ 481,.450
STEP 4 Unmet Road Effort at 1.25 Mills ::
Step 1 nlinus Step 3 (Unle s s Step 3
is greater than Step 1)
STEP 5(A}
Whe re the re is an Unmet Road Efio rt
at 1. 25 Mills Grant applying to it is
Step 4 x o. 90909 ==
$1,319,JOO x 0.90909
Plus Grant equivalent\ to Total
Local Effort (Step 2)
Total Calculated Amount of G J. ant
- or -
80'70 of l\pproved Expendit, .re
(Item I) :: 0.8 x$
Whicheve r is the Ie s se r
OR
-
STEP 5(B)
Whe re the re is no Unmet Road Effo rt
at 1. 25 Mills Grant is 50% of Approved
Expenditure (Item I) == O. 5 x Step 1 ::
O. 5 x $
STEP 6 Grant applying to Urban Rebate Paid
50% of Item H == O. 5 x $ 38.000
21,450
:: $~~1 ,4S0
:: $ i,19Q,lB2
$ I~Rl,450
$ 1,hRO,632
:: $
$ 2 2~j2 000
, ,
--:
$ 962,900
$ 1 .319. 100
5 (A) ~; 1.,680,632
5 (B) $
:: $
19.000
Plus Grant applying to Approved
Expenditure (Step 5(A) or Step 5(B) $
Minus Receipts from Property Disposal**
% of Item N :: O. x $ =: $
Total Grant
STEP 7 Total Grant Payable under Upper Tier
Progra'm is The Allocation (Item A) or
Step 6, whichever is the lesser
):o:~ Percentage to be used is that applicable to year in which property
was purchased. If more than one rate applies, attach separate
calculation to support amount of subsidy claimed a:p.d note years
in which purchases made.
Page 2 of 3
DATE
:$ 1,699,632
$ 1~699,OOO
..4.h.....~.i....~"..~'.. "'""'l'ii7....~~lIirai;. ..... :J:.<O-_".~~.\' ...~~~ """...... .. .... .L...i.~~...~........;.~..__..:....--....,................
ST. THOMAS, ONTARIO.
JANUA~~ 21, 1976.
Pa ge 1.
THE COUNTY OF ELGIN ROAD COMMITTEE met on Jantt~l ry 21
at: 3:00 p.m. in conjunction with County Council at the Municipal
Building.
( Warden Mathew Scha fer, Township of Bayham
(
( Reeve Lorne Carroll, Township of Aldborough
(
( Reeve Doug Simpson, Township of Dunwich
Present (
( Reeve Gary Monteith, Township of Southwold
(
( Reeve David Cook, Township of Yannouth
(
( Deputy Reeve Syd Glover, Town of Aylmer
Advising Members - Reeve J. B. Wilson, Township of South Dorchester
Reeve Wm. Caverly, Township of Malahicie
Reeve John Nemett, Village of Port Stllnley
Ul-10VED BY: S. J. GLOVER
SECONDED BY: L. R. CARROLL
THAT REEVE COOK BE CHAIRMAN OF THE ELGIN COUNTY ROAD
COMMITTEE FOR 1976.
CARRIED"
THE CHAIRMAN THANKED THE COMMITTEE for the hon()Ur
accorded him.
THE ENGINEER REPORTED ON THE WORK TO DATE STATING:
1.. Winter Control had been extremely heavy with Snow Plowing
under way 6 days a week for 11 to 13 hours a day.
2. Although the use of salt and sand had belen reduced j!S much
as possible, approximately $ 40,000 of salt had been used
in the fiscal yea r so fa r.
ST. THOMAS, ONTARIO,
JANUARY 21, 1976.
Page 2
3. Although snow plow equipment repairs had not been hE~avy to
date the constant running would likely take its toll of
equipment.
4. Truck #44 was expected to be running again shortly, have had
to have a rebuilt engine a fter a rod went through the block.
5.
The Whitneys had not yet signed the coun~~t.s offer of
purchase for a portion of their property on Lot 24 Concession
V Yannouth.
"MOVED BY: G. D. SIl-1PSON
SECONDED BY: G. tie MONTEITH
THAT WE RECOMMEND TO COUNTY COUNCIL THAT THE WARDEN APPOINT
DELEGATES TO THE ONTARIO GOOD ROADS ASSOCIATION CONVENTION
AND DELEGATES TO THE ROADS & TRANSPORTATION ASSOCIj~TION
CONVENTION AND THAT THE MEMBERSHIP FEE FOR BOTH ASSOCIATIONS
BE PAID.
CARRIEDtt
"MOVED BY: S. J. GLOVER
SECONDED BY: M. S. SCHAFER
THAT WE RECOMMEND TO COUNTY COUNCIL THAT By.LAWS BJE; PASSED
WHICH WILL IN EFFECT CHANGE THE NUMBER OF COUNTY ROAD 15 TO
COUNTY ROAD 8 ElCEPT FOR THAT PORTION OF MAIN STREET IN DUTTON
NORTH OF THE CURRIE ROAD DIVERSION. THE SAME BY-L,A.W WOULD
REVERT PORTIONS OF JOHN STREET AND CURRIE STREET TO THE VILLAGE
OF DUTTON.
CARRIEDU
ST. THOMAS, ONTARIO.
JANUARY 21, 1976.
Page 3
"MOVED BY: 't. R. CARROLL
SECONDED BY: G. W. MONTEITH
THAT WE RECOMMEND TO COUNTY COUNCIL THAT A BY-LAW BE PASSED
AUTHORIZING THE WARDEN AND CLERK TO SIGN PLANS TO EXPROJ?RIATE
LAND TO WIDEN COUNTY ROADS AS NECESSARY IN 1976.
CARRIEDn
UPCOMING WORK IN ROADS was reviewed including a Budget
and insurance reviews.
SOLID WASTE WAS DISCUSSED at some length with the Engineer
reporting that:
1. No price per ton was available x;r(>m the St. Thomas Collection
Services Limited for disposal.
2,. The City of London had approved the County's applicution to
use the Cia rke Road Site as an emergency site subject to the
Ministry of the Environment approval.
3,. February 12 had been set as a date for an Environmental Board
Hea ring in Dutton for the County's application fo r t:he use 0 f
the Dunwich Site as interim County Site.
AFTER DISCUSS ION
ItMOVED BY: M. A. Scha fer
SECONDED BY: S. J. Glover
THAT THE COUNTY SOLICITOR BE REQUESTED lro REPRESENT THE COUNTY
AT THE ENVIRONMENTAL HEARING BOARD FOR THE TOWNSHIP OF DUNWICH
SITE IJS A COUNTY WASTE DISPOSAL SITE.
CARRIED"
s't. taOWS. 011'tt-R10.
J~~AR~ 21, 1976.
1> a. ge 4
O'M,QV'ED 1)1:
G. D. S I1-fpS ON
S J!C 0l1D BD "B'l' G. 1A · MOl1'tE 1 ta
'tl\~'t taE 1AlJIDEl1. C\l~1~' El1G111EER. SOL1C1'tOR "BE A
CO~1't'tEE 'to 14J!.E't \l1ta REl'RJ1.SEN't~'t1'1ES OF taE S't. 't\:1.0WS
St.l11'tAR'l COLLEC't10l1 SE'R'11CES 1.'tI)' 'to D1SCUSS 1AlIS'tE D1Sl'oSp.1...
C~'Rl'ED\\
~rM.OV'ED 1) Y :
S J!C 0l1D lID "B'l' G . 1A · MOl1'tE 1 't\:1.
tat>.'t \1E Rl!CO~J!l'1D 'to CO\ll1't'l CO\ll1C1L 'til~'t taE 1AlJIDEl1 t.l1ll RElWE
L1E"Bl1ER "BE taF. CO\ll1't'l'S REl'RESEl1't~'t1VES 011 taE LOl1DOl1 ~t-
SOL1D 1AlIS'tE D1Sl'oSt-L s'tIlD'l S'tEER1.l1G CO~1'J:'tEE
ct$Rl'ED"
L. R. CARROLL
"MOVED 1)1:
G. D. S l~-pSON
Sl!COl1DBD"B'l' G.1A.M~~ta
ta"-'t \1E ~JO\lIU' 'to 1E"B~p.1l.'l t1 at 1.0,00 A.M.
cjJt'RIED"
~
c'\:l~1.~
ST. '!1l0lMS, ONT~10.
J~U~Y 14, 1976.
Page 1
COUNTl OY ELG1N RO~ COl1Ml.'tTEE 1:1ET at the Municipal
Building at 10:00 a.m. on JanuaetY 14. hll metnbeetS petesent except
Ree"e Caetetoll and Ca"eetlY' AlsO petesent Yetank Claet~e. The
eteading of the t1\inutes '\il8.S postponed until the next meeting.
'!1lE ENG1NEER REP~'tEll ON '!1lE Vl~R 'to DA'tE as follo~
1.
hp pet o"a 1 had been etecd "eO. fetom the }iini stetY 0 f 'tetanspoetta don
and CotolllUnications of the assuro.ption of centennial .",enue
fetOm Road 45 to Elm 5teteet.
'that the Vlhi t ney' shad "eetba 11 Y accepted the county 0 f Elgin
o Heet 0 f $ 30,000 foet theiet petOpeetty south 0 f the 'township
Road in Lot 24 concession V laettnOuth and that a wctitten offeet
of pUetchase had been oode.
'that instetUctions had been etecei"ed fetom Jatl\es Y. MacLaeten
Limited to etepaiet the sea ~all at Poett Buet~ell as soon as
possible and that the }iiniStetY of Natuetal Resouetces ,.;jOuld be
appetoached foet assistance in the etepaietS but bad ~eatheet had
stOpped any eHoettS to etepaiet it.
Vlinteet contetol, both plo~ng and sanding had been hea"Y
(8 inches tnOete of sno~ on the meeting date).
A connecting etOd had gone thetough the bloc~ on t1:Uck 4144 and
a ne~ block assemblY had been necessaetY.
5toettl\ Drainage ,.;jOet~ on Road 3 noetth of \\igh'\il8.Y 401 had been
stating:
2.
3.
4..
5.
6.
completed.
Detainage ,.;jOet~ foet the Village 0 f Dutton on MaetY Steteet had
been coro.pleted foet the dtl\e being.
1.
ST. THOMAS ~ ONTARIO.
.JANUARY 14, 1976.
Page 2
8. fA perforated pipe was being placed on the hill on Road 39
at Port Burwell in an attempt to cut 0 ff the seepagE~ water in
the hope that the sliding problem could be stopped.
9. Tree Cutting was continuing between snow storms.
UMOVED BY: J. B. Wilson
SECONDED BY: A. H. Liebner
THAT THE FOLLOWING PAYLISTS BE APPROVED FOR PAYMENT
PAYLIST IF 60 - AMOUNTING TO $ 30,971.90
PAYLIST ..4F::.;61 - AMOUNTING TO $ 377.98
PAYLIST 4F 62 - AMOUNTING TO $ 31,839.28
PAYLIST If 63 - AMOUNTING TO $ 217,722.00
PAYLIST IF 1 (1976) AMOUNTING
TO $ 1,258.20
PAYLIST If: 2 (1976) AMOUNTING
TO $ 35,389.31
PAYLIST IF 3 (1976) AMOUNTING
TO $ 66,015.63
CARRIEDtt
CORRESPONDENCE WAS READ FROM
1. The Ministry of Transportation and Communications stating
that the Subsidy Allocation for 1976 would be 1,699,~000 and
the spending level ~~uld be 2,320,000 including urban rebates.
2. Township of Southwold with rezoning By-Law.
3. Ontario Municipal Board with notice that the Town of Aylmer
had applied to annex 2 portions of Malahide Township.
4. The Ministry 0 f Transportation and COUlu(ullications RE~gional
Traffic Engineer suggesting that a 48 inch stop sign be tried
on Road 20 north of Road 16 in Fingal before flashing light
signals were used and that parking should be banned for 100
feet on each corner.
It was decided to erect the sign and ask the Township of
Southwold opinion with regard to the parking ban as the
ST. THOHAS, ONTf\RI0.
JANUARY 14, 1976.
Page 3
Townsbip of SouthwoldlS By-Law Enforcement Officer would be
required to enforce the Parking By-Law.
5. R. K. HcNeil re Mrs. E. A. Smith.
6. Ministry of Transportation and Communications re su'rplus
land for sale near Highway 401 in Southwold and Aldborough
Township. The Engineer was requested to obtain further
particulars.
THE ENGINEER REPoRTED TlIAT the Lower Thames Valley Conservation
~thority were being contacted with regard to the Crane property on
Road 14 and their plans for the building of the Wardsville dam.
THE ENGINEER REPORTED THAT he had requested as a condition
of approval by the County of Elgin Land Division Committee of a
severance on Centennial Ave. that widening be sold to the County
to widen Centennial Ave. This would improve traffic flow north of
the Wellington Street extension.
THE COMMITTEE DISCUSSED the sale of a portion of Lot 7
Concession V Southwold and examined a plan showing 5 parcels on
the County land.
It waS decided to ask the Township of Southwold1s
opinion on the project.
Committee briefly discussed several matters to be discussed by
the 1976 Committee at the January Council Session.
THE COMMITTEE ADJOURNED FOR DINNER
llnUl DINNER recent Solid Waste Developments were discussed.
The Engineer reported that
S't. 'J:\'\.O$S, ml't~10.
JANU.~:{ 14, 1916.
Page 4
(1.> 'the city of London bad app1:'o'l1ed the county of Elgin'S
application to use the city of London'S Cla1:'\<.e Road
Landfill site in an eroe1:'gencY and that the ~inist1:'Y of
the En'l1i1:'O~ent had been 1:'equested to designate the city
of London site as an eme1:'gencY site should an eroe1:'gencY
(2) 'that the cou1:'ie1:' ~uld isSue an apolOgy to Ste'l1e Janes
1:'e the use of his naroe on a lette1:' 1:'e So1.id Waste that
a't'ise.
~1:'. Janes did not write.
'that the St. 'thotnaS Sanita1:'Y collection se1:''I1iCes Limited
had not yet submitted a p1:'ice pe1:' ton fo1:' disposal but
we1:'e supposed to deli'l1er a proposal to the countY solicitor
prior to countY council.
'tbat the St. 'thotnaS Sanitary col1ection ser'l1ices Limited
bad tt\ll.de an offer to sel1 the county of Elgin their landfil1
site in concession 111 in accordance "o.th certain terms and
(3)
conditions.
'the Co~ittee felt that the offer should not be diSCUssed
until the dispOsal p1:'iCe ~aS a'l1ailable.
'J:\'\.E El<G1l<EtR pRESEl<'tED p> REl'(j1. 't tt\Od i fying soroe 0 f the fign1:' es
f J ' 'C' 't.Jt....cLoren Lindted 1:'egll.'rding the cost of t1:'ansp01:'tation of
o ames.l;'. Pc:,1. c;t..
solid ~aste. 'thiS report indicated that in SO fa1:' as domestic
~aste for the countY of Elgin alone ~aS concerned transportatiOn
costS to p>ylme1:' Site were cheape1:' than to London (\I~ lV>) Site
McCaig Site 01:' 1ingal.
$OL1D WJIS'tE WJIS D1SCUSSED at soroe length.
8T. THOMAS, ONTA:RIO.
JANUARy 14, 1976.
Pa ge 5
and support during the year.
THE CHAIRMAN THANKED the Committee for their assistance
UMOVED BY: D. K. Cook
CARRIED BY: A. H. Liebner
THAT WEI\DJOURN TO THE CALL OF THE CHAIRMAN.
CARRIED"
,f%J
CHAI1{MAN
COUNTY OF BLGIN ROAD.COMMIT~
~
St. ThomaS. ontario
Ja.nuary Session
197 6
TO THE WARDBN AND MEMBBRS OF THB COUNTY OF BLGIN
COUNCIL ·
1. That Reeve Liebner and Warden schafer be appointed as
the County of Blgin RepresentatiVes on the Steering
Committee of the London Area solid Waste DispOsal
StudY, A Draft Report is in progreSS and we e~pect
a final report by earlY April.
"WE REC01JlMEND~
All Of Which Is RespectfUllY submitted.
----
CHAIRMAN
COUNTY OF ELGIN ROAD COMMITTEE REPOKT
THIRD i<.EPQRT
JANUAKY SESSION
1 976
TO THE W~f\RDEN AND MEMBEi<.S OF THE ELGIN COUNTY COUNCIL.
I. We hlrlve received notice from the Ministry of Transportation.
and COlSlUnications that the subsidizable spending levels
for Construction and Maintenance (inc luding Urban Rebates)
on C~ounty and St. Thomas Suburban Commission Roads in
1976 will be $ 2,320.000 and thAt the Subsidy Allocation
will be ,$ 1,699,000.
This compares with a spending level in 1975 of $ 2,216,000
and a Subsidy Allocation of $ 1,607,000.
The Ministry of Transportation' and Communica'tions has cut
the construction monies approximately 11% from 1915 to
1976 (being approximately $ 110,000 in spending level
under the amount we would normally be entitled to according
to our 1975 Needs Study Upd8te)~ The actual increase refllects
.,
the 'expected increases in Maintenance, Overhead and, other c:osts
v
~
~,
from1975 to 1976. Oul' Construction Allocation will remain
fairly constant as compared to 1975 as the Needs Study Updlate
f'
sho"ed an incre&se in construction needs from the prior yealr.
WE REC OMMEND
1. That the Warden na~e delegates to the Ontario Good Roads
Association Convention and to the Roads ,and, TYansportation
Association.Convention (formerly the Canadian Good Roads
Asse:>>ciation) and the memb.e~ship fee for both organizations
be paid.
COUNTY OF ELGIN ROAD COMMITTEE l{EPOKT
THlkD KEl?()I.{T - (continued)
JANUAKY SESS ION
1 970
2. That & By-Law be passed authorizing the Warden and Clerk
to silgn Land Plans to expropriate land ~s necessAry to
widen County Roads in 1976. It is necessary that such
By-l4JIWS be passed yearly.
3. That a By-Law be passed that will amend the County's Road
Consolidation.By-Law AS follows:
(8) Assume the present diversion between Main Street and
Currie Street in Dutton as a protion of County Road.
(b) Change the number on present Road 15 in Dutton and
DunwichTowns~pto koad 8 except for ~h8t portion
of Road 15 between Koad 2 and the diversion between
~in Street .and Currie Street in Dutton.
(c) Revert John Street and that portion of Currie Street
south of the diversion to the Village of Dutton.
These changes 1ifill in effect give a continuous County
Road frol1i\ the Lake Road in Dunwich Township to the Thames kive:r
which will be known AS County. Road 8.
A similar By-Law was passed at the November 1975
Session but was rejected by the Ministry of Transportation and
Communications because of its form.
All Of Which Is Respectfully Subrnitted.
CHAIRMAN
. .
CO\WTY Of 1.'.I..GW >!.gffJ S-oJ!IlD!-!>:Z}"!2'::~
::::_::;:=::::::::::;::::::::--==:::~---~- ----. --- -'-
SF. C 0 i't'l) tZ If, ~()t~!
."'".--.~--~....._..__.--- ~
S1'. 1'110~',;~;' Cy,','\,.
J AN\J N'-'{ S f'sS 1 on
\ () '7 ~
,'" ,,,,.,,, "\\S Of T1.\'f, C om":Y Of E 1.G 1 N C 0\1 r,C 11..
TO T1.\Y, ;l#,-DEN /!V"'" ,.....''''1> .
In \Q7S yoUr co~tttee ~as authO~ized to 8ct ~s "
. f S l:d ;l ste pnd ce~toin costS
co~tttee on the DisPOsa\ 0 ,0' a
d -mft~t~ed 6~ fol10~s~
d i th' ~ ~e". ~d 0 n o-r e sU'~"-' ~ ~ -
i ncu-r~e n ,~ ,,~. .
C t~ of E\oin sh.-re of The London h-re~ solId ~.5te
,oun --J 0
Study pP.'JI"ents to city of 1...ondon to doU (CO\\ntY
, 11 3~L. ftet" tbe Mtnistr~
of E\gin sM~e 0 f Study · I'''"'' .
yOUR ROW COMl-lITTEE BEGS TO ttEl'()i:<.1' t$ 1'01.1.,O,"S t
were
1.
$
663.09
of the 1.'. n",i ~onmen t 50"/.. g-r. n t. )
2.
I\.pp'Co iSo \ 0 f St. Thotn>' s San1tp-ry Co 11 ec t.1 on
se~",iteS Ltd. p-rope-rty in concession 111
$ 1,tOO.OO
'to.,ushiP 0 f South\40 \d
\'1: epp 1'. tOrY \4Orl< P nd 1.'. ng i neer in g CO S t s ~i tb
reg.rd to opp\icption by county of Elgin to
na",e 1:o.,ushipof Dun..icb Solid ;lasu Site
epp-ro'l1ed as an /\:re. Solid ;laste Site
$ 2,"93.10
3.
..------
$ 4,256.25
'these exPenditUres ~re p,id through county R08d
\;i 0 the toto\ of countY Road ~ouchers including
v~~~s-~no
~l t $ 2 778 060.87.
Rood ExPenditUres detPi\ed in Report e" ·
~otPl tX?enditUres
t>>11 Of '<!hic" 1s RespectfullY submitted.
C\\A1RMW
~
ROAD COMNITTEE
Fir~..t _~~)~rt '.
St. Thomns, Ontprio.
January Session, 1976.
TO THE WARDEN AND MEMBERS bF THE
COUNTY OF EJ~IN COUNCIL
YOUR ROAD COMHITTEE BEGS TO REPORT fill FOLLOWS: _
The following is a Summary of Costs of Construction and M~lintenRnee on
County and St. Thomas Suburban Road Commission Roads during 1975.
CONSTRUCTION - COUNTY ROADS
1.
Road 112 - From Road 8 to Road 15, Township 0 f Dunwieh
Asphalt Resurfacing.
$ Q,081.03
2.
Road 112 - From Road IF3 to Highway #76 - Villages of
Rodney and West Lorne and Township of Aldborough.
- Drainage, Seeding, etc.
4,753.34
3.
Road #3 - From Highway #3 to L~ke E!ie - Township of
Aldborough.. Grading, GrRnublr Base, Surface
Trea tment.
18,453.0n
4.
Road 113 - Furnival Road South, Villtlge of Rodney, UrbRn
Construction.
22,c}04.71
--,- -- - --- - --- --..-.
5.
Road #3 - South Fleming Creek Bridge southerly approx.
1 mile, Township of Aldborough - Grading,
GrAvelling, Hot Mix Pavi.ng, etc.
56,799.43
6.
.l:{oad #4 - Queen Street West, Village of Rodney, Urban
Construction
13,662.83
- -'-- ---....... -.........
7.
Rond 1;6 - From Road 1;3 to Black's Lrtne, Aldborough
Township, Aspha 1 t Resur fRe ing.
85,139.52
----..----------
8.
Roads #8
& 15
- Nain Street Diversion to Currie Street"
Village of Dutton - Urban Construction
125,373.48
9. Road #13 ...Shackleton St., Village of Dutton,
'Urban Construction
11,028.25
10. Road #20 -Carlow Road, Village of Port Stanley, Urban
Construction at Highway ff3 and At \{arren St.
30,Q51.50
11. Road #30 -From Salt .Creek Cemetery northerly, Yarmouth
Township, Grading, Granular BAse, Hot Mix
P;lving, etc.
178,701.92
...-------------...
12. Road 1;35 - From Highway If3 to Ja ffa, Township 0 f YRrmouth
.and Township of MalAhide Asphalt Resurf~cing.
--~~~!??~:~~---
13. Road #36 -Highway 113 to Sp?rta, Township of'Yarmouth
- Topsoil, Trimming and Seeding, etc.
312.84
14. Road #40 ~Mount Salem to Road 42, T01ifUship of Ma1ahide
Trimming, Seeding, etc.
372.83
15. Road 4/40 -Springfield to Glenc01in, Township 0 f Malahide
AsphHlt Resurfacing
45, 9~'5.67
........----..------
CONSTRUCTION.. COUNTY ROADS (continued)
16. Road /!44 - Highway /13 to Highway #19, Bayham Township,
Aspha 1 t Resur facing.
17. Road #45 - Highway #19 to Ha1dimand Norfolk Regional
Townl ine Township 0 f Bayham, Aspha 1 t
ReS1Jr facing.
18. Road /145 - Calton to Highway 1119, Township of Bayham -
Shouldering, Ditching, Guide Rails, etc.
19. Road /151 - Highway 114 to County 0 f Elgin Garage, Township
of Yarmouth, Grading, Granular Base, and Hot
Mix Paving, etc.
20. Road 1;52 - Froln Road 30 westerly to Road 25, Township
of Yarmouth, Grading, Granular Base, 'Culverts,
Hot Mix Paving, etc.
21. - Whi1te Station Garage, Completion of Renovations,
Pav:ingof Driveways and Parking Lots.
22. - Dra:lnage Assessments (construction).
23. - Surveys for new work on various roads.
24. - Land Purchase
25. - Purchase of Property for Gravel Pits
26. - New and used equipment.
27.
- RebjElte of Provincial Sales Tax paid in past
years. CREDIT
28.
- Machinery Ownership Costs, etc. charged to
ACClDunts Receivable and Townline Accounts CREDIT
TOTAL
CONSTRUCTION B'YTHE ST. THOMAS SUBURBAN ROAD COMMISSION
1. Road #30 - Radio Road from St. Thomas City limits to Salt
Creek Cemetery, Gradi,ng, Granular Base, H()t
Mix Paving, etc . Township of Yarmouth
2. Road 4J22 - Fairview Ave. Surveys
3. - Land Purchase
TOTAL
Add 1975 Stock Balance
SUB TOTAL
Less 1974 Stock Balance
TOTAL 1975 CONSTRUCTION
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION - COUNTY OF ELGIN AND ST. THOMAS
SUBURBAN ROAD COMMISSION
PAGE 2
123,07q.I~9
63,465.80
8,773.44
42,359.47
80,835.25
'11,006.77
____}3.!~~7:~~__
2 375.69
_____..J________
___.. }}J~.?J.:]~__
33 027.06 '
_____...J________
110 697.10
__........_J.._.._____
_ _ _.. :J9..~J.] .I~'__
27 088.43
'.____ _ J________
$ 1,157,697.63
194,221.87
__1- __ _...__ .... ___
__,____ ___ 9.1)J__
__.___:.! !!~.:l:__
$
200,009.51
$ ,7 938.80
------~--------
$ _.... _ '~.I~]J..I~f)__
171.476.91
$ 1.329.174.54
\
MAINTENANCE - COUNTY ROADS
'Bridges
1.
Culverts
2.
Winter ContrOl (1972 Expenditure $ 122,466.
1973 Expenditure $ 72,825.
1974 Expenditure $ 175,688.)
3.
Surface Treatment
4._
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
lO.
11.
12.
13.
14.
Gravel Resurfacing
Repairs to Pavements
Grading Maintenance
Roadside Maintenace
Dust Contt'ol
GraSS And Weed Cutting
Weed Spraying
Tree Gutting
Pavement Marking
Guide Rails'
15. signs
16. Drainage
17. sweeping
18. Tree Planting
19. Railroad Protection
20. Drainage Assessl1lents (Maintenance)
21. Rebates to Town 0 f Ayll1ler and Villages
91 ERHEAD ::- C Oll.!\.!!
1. Superintendence ~ County Engineer
GenerAl superintendent
Assistant Superintendent
2. Clerical
3. Office
4. Garages, Stock and Timekeepers, etc.
5. Niscellaneous Repairs
6. Tools
7. Radio
8.
Insurance
___._!.!.~GE .)-..----.....
_~---~.!~~~.:7}--
_.- _.. _2.!9::.:~:--
_ .._ :!:J2..J 1].: 11--..
__,.. ..2].1]27.: l~.-
_......~~ J~~}.:~1---
.. ... _ .. ~9 J~} 7:. :1] ... ..
._. __llJ ~~]:. J':--
17 129.60
_ ...._ _ ...1. _.- ..---
_..,_ ..~~J!Q2.:9~--
.. ..,_..!~ J 71,].: ?J_-
_ ..'..... ...1J~~~':~~--
21 224.65
_..,.... __ .. J.. -.. ...- - ---
._ __!2.%2~~;3~--
.._---~l~~~;~~--
......_.!~l~3~.:3~_.
__.....!~l~~~.:l2--
_ _ __! 9 .1}}~': ~~..-
367.83
------..--...-----
_..__!2J2~.!.:29.-
278.3~
-----...-----..----
35 730.05
___......l-........---
TOT AL
$ 583_1~? .45 _
..2__22~~~~;~?...-
__.-1~..~91.1~~--
_----IJ..1-11,,9}--
__ _ _);..9~9.t~]....-
10 686.00
--...--.1--------
4 144.18
__-~-_.J..-------
1 779.32
__--..-~t1I#-.....--..-
2 517.02
------.1-------..
OVERHEAD - COUNT~ (continued)
9. Pensions - Canada & OMERS
10. Permits
11. County Share of U.I.C. Contributions
12. HolidAYs with Pay
13. Sick Benefits
14. County Share of Ontario Health Insurance Plan
and Blue Cross Plan.
15. Employees Medicals
16. Needs Study Update
17. Traffic Counts
18. Training Courses
19. Machinery Overhead
20. Overhead Charged to Townline Accounts
21. Overhead Charged to Accounts Receivable
TOTAL OF OVERHEAD
CR ED IT
CREDIT
CREDIT
MAINTENANCE Al\~D OVERHEAD, ST. THONAS SUBURBAN
ROAD COMMISSION (including Items t,ot Subsidized by H.T.C.)
TOTAL MAINTENANCE A~1J) OVERHEAD FOR COUNTY AT'\D ST.
THOMAS SUBURBAN ROADS
MISCELLANEOUS (Not Subsidized by t-1. T.C. )
Elgin Sweeper Repairs and Operating Ch8rges
Elgin Sweeper Rentals Charged to Various Projects
Insurance (Road Liability, etc.)
Charges by Outside Parties to obtain Sales Tax Rebate
Miscellaneous
SUMMARY
CONSTRUCTION
MAINTENANCE A~D OVERHEAD
NISCELLANEOUS
SUB... TOTAL
ADD: 1975 STOCK BALANCE
SUB-TOTAL
LESS: 1974 STOCK BALANCE
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
CREDIT
TOTAL
PAGE 4
34,728.85
35.90
- - _ _1.9.1.9.9].: 18__
--- ..~] .18:>].191__
_.. _ _lfJ.I"~!).s g] _..
_ _ _ _1] .JI fy] Z .: B2.. _
- -- _ - - _ J~ 2.:~1_..
_____J.t].]5.:9;__
__.. - _ 2..'lfJ.: 9'J__
--___J"'J.P2..'~__
____11.lJ~}.:!:9__
_____2..!~~~: ~}__
-___:JJ..].J!;.:!J]__
? 1? Q...59...J)u
5~.~65. ?}
$ 874,932.28
_ _ _ :. _ ~ .1_21 J .:& ~ .. _
--___ ~ !~~S>:22__
_ _ - _ _.. _135~",~2.._
.. _ _ _ _It..b~!J..99.._
_ __ __l..~JJ...o.9__
$
1,752.18
1 329 174.54
__l___l_______~
__,_819..932.2B__
_., _ _ _ ! .a 1 j~ .: ! ~ _ _
_f....Z92...~2~.lQ9__
_ .. _!! ~.a! 2 ~ : 2.?__
2 318 982.35
__.l___J________
100,155.29
- .~..._- -'--" ----.....
$ 2.218.827.06
P;\GF 5
The Subsi.dy allocation. from the }'lir:istry of 'T'rcn~sportat{on :"1fld COT"!mn tC{jtior'~ i,
1975 was in 2 p~rtSt (8) ^ subsidy of $ 1,601,000 on genernl exp~TJd.1tlq~(~Sf '''''i~d
(b) A 50% subsidy (Hl Drainage Asses!?ments tn Amount of $ 6,000. (Totpi
Subsidy $ 1,607,000)
The cost of St. Thomas Suburban Road Commission expendi.tures to the City ()f
St.. Tnom8s '(.4P5 ~;; :"n,422.2~ and the net cost to the Count;,' of Elgin fOl~ the
} ~75 Road Programm4~ (including the County share 0 f the St. ThomRs Suh1Jrt);1r1
!<~)8d System) is esti.11'k'lted at $ )80,L~()O. The ROCld Levy for lq75 WPS
581,000 lepving <in estimated 5t.1rplus of ;.)pproximAtely S 6no.
In add i ti.on to the above Expendi tures, r'!' considerllD le t3mOLlnt 0 f r'lOrk
waS done and invoiced to others A.nd incl.uded the fl,llo,.ring:
1.
Work on County Boundary HO;lds f3ndFrjdges ~nd
invoic.ed to the Counties of MiddLesex pnd Oxford.
S 1 7,441. 9'1
2.
Constructi.on ;1~t the Int.ersection ()f Hi,gl-n.,rRY #73
end County l-~("'l8~d /11+5 end irvoiced to the }lini stry
of TrHnsport:1tion and Comr:unicat.ions.
? , Od 7 .1.9
3.
P(lvi ng ;). nd other work in t.he Vi 1111 ge n f Rodney
and invoiced to Carlinghill ConstnlC't1.0n Comp;'lny
Limi ted (in con j11nc. tion with their l,('l rd stry 0 f
the Envlronment Contrac t for Sa. ni t;1 rv ~.;ewers).
1~"t37/~.19
4.
Granu]nr BRse ;;nd other t.rork in the Vi,llnge of Dutton
and invoi.ced to r<ortn EAst Constnlct1.0lJ Co. Ltd. (-jn
c.onjucctionwith the Hinfstry of the [nvironment Contrpct
for S::nd.tary Sewers).
7,035.Qg
.5.,
Pri.ming Hnd ::;urface TrefltmentWork for vArious
Muni.cipnlit'les, Compi1oies .A.nd i'\gencie's.
7A, L~29.. 6(,
6.
\{oTk done for, and H;, teri a 1 s so ld to IOCA 1
Hunici.p,'i1 i.ties, Government Agenci,es r.nd
Commissions" the Ci.ty of St. ThoTn-<"1s, various
7'Hnlstries of the Provinci(11 Government, ;:lnd the
Kettle Creek Conservation ,'\uthority,:n1d individurlls..
~~33, 108.36
TOT AI.,
s ..J~!.!:_~~~7.J~_?.~~_ _____
TOTi\ L F'xVF:'JD IT'[l'H.ES n,. 1975 WEH E ,:;;' 2, 7"7 J ,304.. h:2 ..
which compflres wi.th $ 2,.301,000 in 1974, S 1,,877,000 in 1973,
$ 2,205,000 in 1972 ~nd $ 2,285,000 in 1971.
/..LL OF tIHICH I;~ RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED..
CHAIRMAN