1996 Suburban Road Committee
ST. THOMAS, ONTARIO
JrANUARY 19, 1996
PAGE 1.
THE ST. THOMAS SUBURBAN ROAD COMMISSION met at the County
Administration Building on Friday, January 19, 1996 at 11:00 a.m.
All members were present as well as the County Enc:rin~er.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
RECOMMENDATION #1
"MOVED BY: A. AUCKLAND
SECONDED BY: D. STOKES
THAT THE MINUTES OF THE MEETING DATED AUGUST 2, 1995 BE
APPROVED.
CARRIED."
SUMMARY OF 1995 EXPENDITURES
Members received a copy of the 1995 Expenditures for the
st. Thomas Suburban Road Commission.
The Engineer reported that expenditures were within the Budget
and rather than replacing a culvert on County Road #56, subdrain
tiles were installed on County Road #30 and County Road #31 and
county Road #31 was resurfaced.
STATUS OF SUBURBAN ROAD COMMISSION
The Engineer reported that based on Bill No. 26 it appears that
the legislation regarding the suburban Road Commission will be
repealed.
The Engineer reported that he had recent discussions with the
Secretary of the ontario Suburban Road Commission Association who
indicated that a letter was being written to the Province requesting
that amendments be made to the legislation to ensure that the cities
provide equivalent funding to the Counties to assist in maintaining
County roads adjacent to the cities.
ATTENDANCE AT THE ONTARIO GOOD ROADS ASSOCIATION ~CONFERENCE
The Engineer reported that this matter would be discussed with
the City and the Physical Services Committee to Slee if consideration
could be made for the st. Thomas Suburban Road Co]nmission members to
attend the 1996 Ontario Good Roads Association Conference.
ADJOURNMENT
RECOMMENDATION #2
"MOVED BY: D. STOKES
SECONDED BY: A. AUCKLAND
THAT WE ADJOURN TO MEET AGAIN AT THE CALL OF THE CHAIRMAN.
CARRIED. II
CH1\IRMAN
COUNTY OF ELGIN ROAD DEPARTMENT
ST. THOMAS SUBURBAN ROAD COMMISSION
1995 EXPENDITURES
1. t1AINTENANCE
A - Bridges and Culverts
B - Roadside Maintenance
C - Hard Top Maintenance
D - Loose Top Maintenance
E - winter Control
F - Safety Devices
TOTAL MAINTENANCE
2. DRAINAGE ASSESSMENTS
3 . CONSTRUCTIOli
(Paved Road #30 and Road #31,
Engineering for Road #30
at Road #48 & Road #52)
4. ~AND PURCHASE
(Roads #25, #28, #30, #52 & #56)
5. ENGINEERING
5% of Construction (3)
6. OVERHEAD 7%
1995 BUDGET
5,000
20,000
15,000
20,000
105,000
35,000
$200,000
1,0010
400,0010
5,0010
20,0010
TOTAL ROAD EXPENDUTURE $669,820
43,820
LESS: M.T.O. Grant (72.336% / 71.092%)
LESS: County Share (50%)
PLUS: Suburban Share of Memberships and
Conferences (50% of $1,000)
~ESS: 1995 city's 1/2 Mill contribution
BALANCE
-484,520
$185,300
/-92,650
$92,650
500
$93,150
-92,150
$1,000
------.-
--------
JANUARY 15, 1996'
1995
EXPENDITUREIt
2,288
31,013
12,530
25,774
89,937
30,815
$192,357
~
393,317
.
6,926
~
41,482
$634,082
-450,782
$183,300
-91,650
$91,650
500
--------
$92,150
-92,150
$~
-------
-------
FRED GROCH
COUNTY ENGINEER
-
MARK G. McDONALD
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR/CLERK
450 SUNSET DRIVE
ST. THOMAS, ONTARIO
N5R 5V1
PHONE (519) 631-1460
FAX (519) 633.7661
(Mrs.) SANDRA J. HEFFREN
DEPUTY COUNTY CLERK
April 29, 1996
Mayor Stephen Peters
41 St. Catherine Street
81. Thomas, Ontario
N5P 2V7
Dear Sir:
Warden Mezenberg and Elgin County Council would like to extend an invitation to you
. to join thenl for lunch at their May 28th, 1996 Session, at which thne the members of the
Suburban Roads Commission will be honoured. If you plan to attend the luncheon,
please call Donna in the County Clerk's Office at 631-1460, Ext. 161, by May 17th, 1996,
to confirm your attendance.
We look forward to seeing you at the County Administration Building, 450 Sunset Drive,
S1. Thomas, at 12:00 noon.
Yours truly,
yf9~
Sandra J. Heffren (Mrs.),
Deputy Clerk.
SJH/mp
cc -F. Groch, County Engineer
MARK G. McDONALD
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR/CLERK
450 SUNSET DRIVE
ST THOMAS, ONTARIO
N5R 5V1
PHONE (519) 631-1460
FAX (519) 633-7661
(Mrs.) SANDRA J. HEFFREN
DEPUTY COUNTY CLERK
April 29, 1996
Mr. Albert W. Auckland
R.R. #7
S1. Thomas, Ontario
N5P 31'2
Dear Sir:
Warden Mezenberg and Elgin County Council would like to extend an invitation to you
. to join them for lunch at their May 28th, 1996 Session. If you plan to attend the
luncheon, please call Donna in the County Clerk's Office at 631-1460, Ext. 161, by May
17th, 1996, to confirm your attendance.
We look forward to seeing you at the County Administration Building; 450 Sunset Drive,
S1. Thomas, at 12 :00 noon.
Yours truly,
y19:~
Sandra J. RetIren (Mrs.),
Deputy Clerk.
SJR/mp
cc -F. Groch, County Engineer
MARK G. McDONALD
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR/CLERK
450 SUNSET DRIVE
ST. THOMAS, ONTARIO
N5R 5V1
PHONE (519) 631-1460
FAX (519) 633-7661
(Mrs.) SANDRA J. HEFFREN
DEPUTY COUNTY CLERK
April 29, 1996
Mr. Roderick Ferguson
R.R. #2
St. Thomas, Ontario
N5P 386
Dear Sir:
Warden Mezenbergand Elgin County Council would like to extend ,ill invitation to you
to join them for lunch at their May 28th, 1996 Session. If you plan to attend the
luncheon, please call Donna in the County Clerk's Office at 631-1460, Ext. 161, by May
17th, 1996, to confirm your attendance.
We look forward to seeing you at the County Administration Building, 450 Sunset Drive,
St. Thomas, at 12:00 noon.
Yours truly,
v1?f:~
Sandra J. Heffren (Mrs.),
Deputy Clerk.
SJH/mp
cc -F. Groch, County Engineer
MARK G. McDONALD
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR/CLERK
450 SUNSET DRIVE
81: THOMAS, ONTARIO
N5R 5V1
PHONE (519) 631-1460
FAX (519) 633-7661
(Mrs.) SANDRA J. HEFFREN
DEPUTY COUNTY CLERK
April 29, 1996
Mr. Don Stokes
19 Paulson Court
St. Thomas, Ontario
N5R IN!
Dear Sir:
Warden Mezenberg and Elgin County Council would like to extend an invitation to you
, to join thenl for lunch at their May 28th, 1996 Session~ If you plan to attend the
luncheon, please call Donna in the County Clerk's Office at 631-1460, Ext. 161, by May
17th, 1996, to confirm your attendance.
We look forward to seeing you at the County Administration Building, 450 Sunset Drive,
S1. Thomas, at 12:00 noon.
Yours truly,
sd9-'~
Sandra J. Heffren (Mrs.),
Deputy Clerk.
SJH/mp
cc -F. ..Groch, County.Engineer
Peter J. Leack, A.M.C.T.
City Clerk
Office of the Clerk
p, O. Box 520, City Hall
81. Thomas, Ontario N5P 3V7
Telephone: (519) 631-1680
Fax: (519) 633-9019
Corporation of the City of St. Thomas
March 7th, 1996
Mr. Fred Groch
County Engineer
County of Elgin
450 Sunset Drive
St. Thomas, Ontario
N5R 5VI
Re: 1996 Bude:et
Dear Mr. Groch:
Please be advised that the Council of the City of St. Thomas gave careful consideration to the
approval of a levy for the St. Thomas Suburban Roads Commission. However, we must advise
that an appropriation to the S1. Thomas Surburban Roads Commission has not been made this
year.
Should you have any questions in this regard, please advise.
~
P. 1. Leack
City Clerk
P JL/mlv
pc: Mr. 1. Gubinczki, City Treasurer
Mr. 1. Dewancker, Director of Public Works and Engineering
,': CEIVED MAR 1 1 1996
N. ROY MAIN
City Administrator
Department of Administrative Services
P.O. Box 520, City Hall
St. Thomas, Ontario N5P 3V7
Telephone (519) 631-1680
Fax (519) 633-9019
Corporation of the City of St. Thomas
March 6, 1996
Mr. Mark McDonald, Clerk
County of Elgin
450 Sunset Drive
St. Thomas, Ontario
N5R 5V1
Dear Mr. McDonald:
RE: Suburban Road~ Commission
This letter is to confirm that the City has opted to discontinue its involvement with Suburban
Roads Commission. The funding provided in previous years has not been included within this
year's estimates.
In the event any costs were encumbered with respect to the recent GOO{f Roads Convention, the
City will covers its proportionate share.
v-:;
c.c. J. Dewancker, Director of Engineering
......-.-_-~
?..- -.,
.'. f ("...,v 1 0
. "-"". f" .~
I tfftd h-('Q~
I ~ ~ Ie..- .__
L.::!::____ '- .
519-823-1694 WELLINGTON CTY. ADM.
48E~ P01/05 FEE 08 '96 11 : 40
COUNTY OF WELLINGTON
OFFICE OF THE COUNTV' ENGINEER
ADMINISTRATION CENTAE
74 WOOLWICH STReeT
GUELPH ON N1 H 3T9
TEL: (519) 837.2S01
FAX: (519) 823.1694
February 8, 1996
c -c c:; t..-L.~j'~ ~/ b4 VI
H -f> I.e--'\._ bot" Y' r
/' tu~~~~
c~~~_
GOROON J. OUGH, P.En9,
COUNTY ENGINEEA
VIA FAX: 1-519-633..7661
Mr. Fred Groch, P. Eng.
Commission Engineer
St. Thomas Suburban Roads Commission
County Administration Building
450 Sunset Drive
St. Thomas ON N5R 2L3
Dear Fred:
It is my understanding that with the passing of Bill 26 on January 2911 1996 that aU
legislation related to Suburban Roads Commissions, funding and otherwise, has been
eliminated and is reportedly retroactive to January 1, 1996. 111is being the case, I guess
it is the end of an era.
I have talked with the President of the Suburban Roads Commission ,Association, Mr.
Fergus Young of the Peterborough Commission about the value in scheduling a wind up
annual meeting in Toronto at the Ontario Good Roads Convention and would like to '
inform you that, since our Commissions are effective.lygone and therefore, few if any
former CODlmissioners would be attending the Convention, there will be no annual
meeting.
Tbe remaining piece of business to take care of will be the closing out of the
Association's bank account and the disposal of the balance of funds (approximately
$1,200.00). It is proposed that the funds be donated to a chality that services
Communities across the province. One possibility being considered is Ronald McDonald
House.
Attached for your interest is a letter of JanualY 5, 1996 from Fergus Young, the
President of the Suburban Roads Commission Associatio,n, to the General Government
Committee and a letter of January 30, 1996 from tbe Minister of Transportation in
response to a Guelph Suburban Roads Commission letter ,in which concerns were
expressed with the proposed elimination of the Suburban Road concept.
......2
. ....,.......-... . '''..,..-..... "._-.._...,... ......."..
519-823-1694 WELLINGTON CTY. ADM.
48E; P02/05 FEE 08 '96 11 : 40
......2
If you get down to the Good Roads Convention and if you get a ohance, drop by the
Wellington County hospitality suite in the Banff Room and I'll buy you a sociable
beverage.
Yours very truly,
~y~
Gordon J. Ough, P. Eng.
County Engineer
'GJO/sg
att.
519-823-1694 WELLINGTON CTY. ADM.
486 P03/05 FEE 08 '96 11:40
SUBURBAN ROADS COMMISSION ASSOCIATION
County of Wellington
Administration Centre
74 Woolwich Street
Guelph ON NlH 3T9
January 5, 1996
VIA FAX: 1-416-325-3505
Ms. Tonia Grannum
Clerk of the Committee
General Government Committee
Room 1405 Whitney Block
Queens Park
Toronto ON M7A tA2
Dear Ms. Grannum:
RE: BI,LL Z6 (SUBURBAN ROADS COMMISSIONS)
I am writing in my capacity as president of the Suburban Roads Conllmission Association
to express some concerns related to Bill 26 and to urge the govemmc~nt of the day to
reconsider the proposal to repeal Sections 6S to 71 dealing with Suburban Roads
Commissions.
There are some 18 predominantly rural counties across the province, with Suburban Road
Commissions that currently maintain county roads that lead in and out of separated
towns or cities. These roads are typically extraordinarily heavily travlelled because of the
influence of the city oriented traffio and they require more than nornla) maintenance and
upgrading because of this traffic.
Currently Sections 65-71 of the Public Transportation and Highway IllIlprovement Act
recognizes an obligation on behalf of the separated town or city to contribute financially
to the County to protect it from being unfairly burdened with the higb maintenance
demands on these roads that lie in close proximity to the city.
It is this Associationts position that the financial obligation on behalf of the separate
towns or cities should be maintained.
......2
519-823-1694 WELLINGTON CTY. ADM.
48f5 P04/05 FEE 08 '96 11 : 40
.......,2
The Suburban Roads Association has Dot been contacted regarding 'the plans to abolish
Suburban Roads Commission legislation as part of Bil) 26 and tODsc::quently, I am
unaware of whether or not there are any plans by this governMent tel replace the
protection referred to above in another fashion or through some separate regulations.
]11 order that I can better respond to tbe membership of the Suburb~~n Roads
Commission Association I would appreciate some communication with respect to the
above and, if there are no plans to replace the protection iu another fashion, would urge
the government to amend Bill 26 to delete tbe proposals that \vould abolish all Suburban
Roads legislation.:
Yours truly,
~17
Pergus Young. President
Suburban Roads Commission Association
cc Hon. Mike Harris, Premier
Hon. Al PalJadini. Minister of TraDsportation
HOD. AI uach, Minister of Municipal Affairs & Housing
Ontario Good Roads Association
Ontario Municipalities of Ontario
519-823-1694 WELLINGTON CTY. ADM.
486 P05/05 FEE 08 '96 11:41
Ministry of
Transportation
Offioe of the Minister
Ferguson Block. 3rd Floor
n Wellesley St. West
Toronto, Ontario
M7A 1Z8
(416) 327.9200
Mlnlstere des
Transports
Bureau du mlnlstre
~difice Fergu~on, 36 etage
Tl, rue Wellesley ouest
Toronto (Ontario)
M7A 1Za
(416) 327-9200
ltJ
Ontario
January 30, 1996
Mr. Gordon J. Ough, P.Eng.
County Engineer
County of Wellington
Administration Centre
74 Woolwich Street
Guelph, Ontario
N1H 3T9
Dear Mr. Ouqh:
I have been asked by Ted Arnott, MPP Wellington, to respond to
the December 18, 1995 letter you sent him regarding the suburban
roads commission legislation.
It is important to first understand what our objectives were
when we reviewed our programs and legislation respecting
municipalities. It is this government's belief that
municipalities are ready for, and need, more autonomy if they
are to deal with the current economic pressures. Municipalities
understand the needs and priorities of local citizens better
than the province.
With this in mind we have initiated many changes including
creation of the municipal support grant program and legislative
improvements. It was clear in reviewing the legislation on
suburban roads that the province no longer needs to prescribe
the financial or administrative relations between Counties and
separated Cities and Towns regarding country roads. This is why
we are proposing to repeal the suburban roads legislation.
I urge you, the Guelph suburban roads commission and other
municipal officials to continue discussing what form of
agreement best serves the travelling public in both the City of
Guelph and Wellington County.
C;~:~~
Al Palladini
Minister
-
cuu~'~ r't O~ \ti~'LLli~G~fi~
ce. Honourable Al Leach, Minister MMAH
Ted Ar~ott-MPP, Wellington
FEu - 5 1998
ftC,ADS OEPARTb'ENT
Made 'rom recovered materials F~it ds materiaux recup~16s
FRED GROCH. BASc.. M.Eng., P.Eng.
Engineer and Road Superintendent
450 SUNSET DRIVE
ST. THOMAS, ONTARIO
N5R 5V1
TELEPHONE (519) 631-1460-4
FAX NO. (519) 633-7661
CLAYTON WATTERS, BASc.. P.Eng.
Assistant County Engineer
February 6, 1996
Mr. Donald R. Stokes
19 Paulson Court
st. Thomas, ontario
N5R 1N1
Dear Don:
Re: st. Thomas Suburban Road Commission
ontario Good Roads Association Annual Conference
As you are aware Bill 26 has rescinded the Suburban Road
Commissions in ontario.
This matter was discussed at a recent Physical S,ervices Committee
meeting and it was felt that due to recent major Provincial funding
cuts it would not be appropriate for the Road Department to authorize
the attendance of the st. Thomas Suburban Road Commission members to
the Annual ontario Good Roads Association Conference.'
Members of the Committee have appreciated your contribution and
dedicated service to the st. Thomas Suburban Road Commission over the
past several years arid it is unfortunate that this tradition has been
curtailed by the provincial Government.
For your information it appears that the City of st. Thomas will
not be providing any funds for the st. Thomas Suburban Road Commission
in 1996.
Yours truly,
FG:kab
FRED GROCH, B.A.Sc., M.Eng., P.Eng.
ENGINEER AND ROAD SUPERINTENDENT
FRED GROCH, BASe" M.Eng., P.Eng.
Engineer and Road Superintendent
450 SUNSET DRIVE
ST. THOMAS, ONTARIO
N5R 5V1
TELEPHONE (519) 631.1460-4
FAX NO. (519) 633-7661
CLAYTON WATTERS, BASe., P.Eng.
Assistant County Engineer
February 6, 1996
Mr. Roderick Ferguson
R. R. #2
st. Thomas, ontario
N5P 3S6
Dear Rod:
Re: st. Thomas Suburban Road Commission
Ontario Good Roads Association Annual Conference
As you are aware Bill 26 has rescinded the Suburban Road
Commissions in ontario.
This matter was discussed at a recent Physical Se!rvices Committee
meeting and it was felt that due to recent major provi.ncial funding
cuts it would not be appropriate for the Road Departme!nt to authorize
the attendance of the st. Thomas Suburban Road Commiss:ion members to
the Annual ontario Good Roads Association Conference.
Members of the Committee have appreciated your contribution and
dedicated service to the st. Thomas Suburban Road Comn\ission over the
past several years and it is unfortunate that this tradition has been
curtailed by the Provincial Government.
For your information it appears that the City of st. Thomas will
not be providing any funds for the st. Thomas Suburban Road Commission
in 1996.
Yours truly,
FRED GROCH, B.A.Se., M.Eng., P.Eng.
ENGINEER AND ROAD SUPERINTENDENT
FG:kab
FRED GROCH, BASe" M.Eng., P.Eng.
Engineer and Road Superintendent
450 SUNSET DRIVE
ST. THOMAS, ONTARIO
N5R 5V1
TELEPHONE (519) 631-1460-4
FAX NO. (519) 633-7661
CLAYTON WATTERS. BASe., P.Eng.
Assistant County Engineer
February 5, 1996
Mr. Albert Auckland
R. R. #7
st. Thomas, ontario
N5P 3T2
Dear Albert:
Re: st. Thomas Suburban Road Commission
ontario Good Roads Association Annual Conference
As you are aware Bill 26 has rescinded the Suburban Road
Commissions in ontario.
This matter was discussed at a recent Physical Services Committee
meeting and it was felt that due to recent major Provincial funding
cuts it would not be appropriate for the Road Department to authorize
the attendance of the st. Thomas Suburban Road Commission members to
the Annual ontario Good Roads Association Conference.
Members of the Committee have appreciated your 'contribution and
dedicated service to the st. Thomas Suburban Road Commission over the
past several years and it is unfortunate that this tradition has been
curtailed by the Provincial Government.
For your information it appears that the City of st. Thomas will
not be providing any funds for the st. Thomas Suburban Road Commission
in 1996.
Yours truly,
FRED GROCH, B.A. Sc., M. Eng., P. Eng.
ENGINEER AND ROAD SUPERINTENDENT
FG:kab
COUNTY OF ELGIN ROAD DEPARTMENT
ST. THOMAS SUBURBAN ROAD COMMISSION
1995 EXPENDITURES
<{'
1. MAINTENANCE
A - Bridges and Culverts
B - Roadside Maintenance
C - Hard Top Maintenance
D - Loose Top Maintenance
E - winter Control
F - Safety Devices
TOTAL MAINTENANCE
2. DRAINAGE ASSESSMENTS
3 . CONSTRUCTIOK
(Paved Road #30 and Road #31,
Engineering for Road #30
at Road #48 & Road #52)
4. LAND PURCHASE
(Roads #25, #28,#30, #52 & #56)
5. ENGINEERING
5% of Construction (3)
6. OVERHEAD 7%
1995 BUDGET
JliliUARY 15, 1996
1995
EXPENDITURES
5,000 2,288
20,000 31,013
15,000 12,530
20,000 25,774
105,000 89,937
35,000 30,815
-------- --------
$200,000 $192,357
1,000 '~
400,000 393,317
5,000 6,926
20,000
~
43,820
41,482
TOTAL ROAD EXPENDUTURE $669,820
-450,782
LESS: M.T.O. Grant (72.336% / 71.092%)
LESS: County Share (50%)
PLUS: Suburban Share of Memberships and
Conferences (50% of $1,000)
~ESS: 1995 City's 1/2 Mill contribution
BALANCE
$634,082
-484,520
$185,300
$183,300
-92,650
-91,650
$92,650
$91,650
500
500
$93,150
$92,150
-92,150
-92,150
$1,000
$~
FRED GROCH
COUNTY ENGINEER
January 30, 1996
450 SUNSET DRIVE
ST. THOMAS, ONTARIO
N5R 5V1
PHONE (519) 631.1460
FAX (519) 633.7661
MARK G. McDONALD
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR/CLERK
(Mrs.) SANDRA J. HEFFREN
DEPUTY COUNTY CLERK
Mr. Jim Gubinczki, Treasurer
City of st. Thomas
City Hall
P.O. Box 520
ST. THOMAS, ontario
N5P 3V7
Dear Mr. Gubinczki:
Subiect: Fundinq for the Suburban Road System
The Council of the Corporation of the County of El9in, at its
January 23rd, 1996 Session, approved the following recommendation
from its Physical Services Committee:
"THAT the County request the City of st. Thomas to
provide funding support to the suburban road :system as
in previous years.
- Carried.
(signed) Warden Harry J. :Mezenberg"
The rationale for this request lies in the knowledge that the .roads
in question involve high-volume traffic used by the citizens and
businesses located in the City of st. Thomas. Given the level of
use on these roads, we believe our request is reasonable and fair.
We look forward to your response.
Yours truly,
Mark G. McDOnald,
County Administrator/Clerk.
MGM/db
cc - Mr. Fred Groch, County Engineer
- Ms. Linda Shewfelt, County Treasurer
- Mr. John Dewancker, City Engineer
ST. THOMAS, ONTARIO
J"ANUARY 19, 1996
PAGE 1.
THE ST. THOMAS SUBURBAN ROAD COMMISSION met alt the County
Administration Building on Friday, January 19, 1996 at 11:00 a.m.
All members were present as well as the County Engrineer.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
RECOMMENDATION #1
"MOVED BY: A. AUCKLAND
SECONDED BY: D~ STOKES
THAT THE MINUTES OF THE MEETING DATED AUGUST 2, 1995 BE
APPROVED.
CARRIED."
SUMMARY OF 1995 EXPENDITURES
Members received a. copy of the 1995 Expenditures for the
st. Thomas Suburban Road Commission.
The Engineer reported that expenditures were within the Budget
and rather than replacing a culvert on County Road #56, subdrain
tiles were installed on County Road #30 and County Road #31 and
County Road #31 was resurfaced.
STATUS OF SUBURBAN ROAD COMMISSION
\
The Engineer reported that based on Bill No. 26 it appears that
the legislation regarding the suburban Road Commission will be
repealed.
The Engineer reported that he had recent discussions with the
Secretary of the ontario Suburban Road Commission Association who
indicated that a letter was being written to the l?rovince requesting
that amendments be made to the legislation to ensure that the cities
provide equivalent funding to the Counties to assist in maintaining
County roads adjacent to the cities.
ArrrENDANCE AT THE ONTARIO GOOD ROADS ASSOCIATION CONFERENCE
The Engineer reported that this matter would be discussed with
the city and the Physical Services Committee to see if consideration
could be made for the st. Thomas Suburban Road Commission members to
attend the 1996 ontario Good Roads Association Conference.
ADJOURNMENT
RECOMMENDATION #2
"MOVED BY: D. STOKES
SECONDED BY: A. AUCKLAND
THAT WE ADJOURN TO MEET AGAIN AT THE CALL OF THE CHAIRMAN.
CARRIED."
CHAIRMAN
COUNTY OF ELGIN ROAD DEPARTMENT
ST. THOMAS SUBURBAN ROAD COMMISSION
1995 EXPENDITURES
1. ~INTENANCE
A - Bridges and Culverts
B - Roadside Maintenance
C - Hard Top Maintenance
D - Loose Top Maintenance
E - winter Control
F - Safety Devices
TOTAL MAINTENANCE
2. DRAINAGE ASSESSMENTS
3 . CONSTRUCTIOli.
(Paved.Road #30 and Road #31,
Engineering for Road #30
at Road #48 & Road #52)
4. ~AND PURCHASE
(Roads #25, #28, #30, #52 & #56)
5. ENGINEERING
5% of Construction (3)
6. OVERHEAD 7%
1995 BUDGET
5,0010
20,0010
15,000
20,000
105,000
35,000
$200,000
1,000
400,000
5,000
20,000
43,820
TOTAL ROAD EXPENDUTURE $669,820
LESS: M.T.O. Grant (72.336% / 71.092%)
LESS: County Shar'e (50%)
PLUS: Suburban Share of Memberships and
Conferences (50% of $1,000)
;LESS: 1995 city's 1/2 Mill contribution
BALANCE
-484,520
$185,300
-92,650
$92,650
500
$93,150
-92,150
$1,000
--------
--------
JANUARY 15, 1996'
1995
;EXPENDITURES
2,288
31,013
12,530
25,774
89,937
30,815
$192,357
~
393,317
6,926
~
41,482
$634,082
-450,782
$183,300
-91,650
$91,650
500
$92,150
-92,150
$~
-------
-------
FRED GROCH
COUNTY ENGINEER
COUNTY OF ELGIN ROAD DEPARTMENT
ST. THOMAS SUBURBAN ROAD COMMISSION
1995 EXPENDITURES
JANUARY 15, 1996'
1. MAINTENANCE
1995 BUDGET
1995
EXPENDITURES
A -Bridges and Culverts
TOTAL MAINTENANCE
5,0010 2,288
20,000 31,013
15,000 12,530
20,000 25,774
105,000 89,937
35,000 30,815
-------- --------
$200,000 $192,357
1,000 ~
400,000 393,317
B - Roadside Maintenance
C - Hard Top Maintenance
D - Loose Top Maintenance
E - winter Control
F - Safety Devices
2. DRAINAGE ASSESSMENTS
3 . CONSTRUCTION..
(Paved Road #30 and Road #31,
Engineering for Road #30
at Road #48 & Road #52)
4. ~AND PURCHASE
(Roads #25, #28, #30, #52 & #56)
5,000
6,926
5. ENGINEERING
5% of Construction (3)
20,000
~
6. OVERHEAD 7%
43,820
41,482
TOTAL ROAD EXPENDUTURE $669,820
$634,082
LESS: M.T.O. Grant (72.336% / 71.092%)"
-484,520
-450,782
$185,300
$183,300
LESS: County Share (50%)
-92,650
-91,650
$92,650
$91,650
PLUS: Suburban Share of Memberships and
Conferences (50% of $1,000)
500
500
$93,150
$92,150
~ESS: 1995 city's 1/2 Mill Contribution
-92,150
-92,150
BALANCE
$1,000
$~
------.-
------.-
-------
-------
FRED GROCH
COUNTY ENGINEER
Corporation of the County of E1gin
rJ:
No. .lk: . . . . .
FRIDAY, JANUARY 19, 1996
Seconded by
~~i~kft~
Moved by
THAT THE MINUTES OF THE MEETING DATED AUGUST 2. 1995 BE APPROVED.
t~
L~
Corporation of the County of Elgin
NO.W
--...
FRIDAY, JANUARY 19, 1996
,...,/'/ ,~,;1;7'''-''''~~:~? . ")~
<_/(/ &[;j~1c.~ . . .'
- , ~ 1 1 I
. {,A.. /1 ~-C-'" /
'- . (
THAT WE ADJOURN TO MEET AGAIN AT THE CALL OF THE CHAIRMAN.
Hoved by
Seconded by
x~ ~
7 ____
. -
i
I
,
i
; , I
LU
I i
! !
i '
I I
,~;
I i
i
: i
~-~
J
i
!
! i
r I, ' I }---i--l-__L__ i' ',' r-f--- - --- -.-'
-fH-J __HHi-+t-,-c- _~ _ __ _ i.
I I I I I I II
I 1------1
I I
I I I ,__
I -I--l--l
--i--,---!---4I1 1 i
i H- I ~+tJ--t- _ i
I! I I ~~_! I I ,
H:-~--~+l~ ] fi+' I I - h-
I t--t+t--++-+-+-I pTI1 I I I --- . I
i-~-~t#jIT~+~'EEI' I' -I~~-I~-I-=--~
-~---l-J-IC--J- I I [-+--1-+ - , '--~-EI I I I
I I I I L I I ! I LI I I I t I I
-t---+- rlL~-- -+--1 I I I '-'-1--1--'- -r--r- ~C--_ 'i I I I
'-l-tL'-~RTItlr,rT++frLf r I--I-:J
---J---r-1--T-- =o=ttf+=R--+--+-+ I -l-I-t-----t I
; I I I I I I I I I! I I i
--r-----ri-it i ---I I -r-:-iTi--t-t- I I
~ I I , I ! ' I I I I' " I I I I I I !
liTTl r~! I Ill-+P ' , -HI '+J I I
111111!--liW_JIIII,,1111
!I"IIII~IIIII I, 'I II
! I I 'I II i I I
!--L__J L, I I I I I
LL' I II' -i-:;: 'I' i IT i I I
i! i i i~1 i i i I:.
I! I! 1I11 III i lLLU
I I I I I i~-f-----JI I I I I
. I I i I I ' I I ,I J I
I ! ! I i I I Ii' I I
I L-J I
I I i I, i,'
:, 1 I"
L-...J
i I I I I !
-f I
I
I
-,----- -
-.,
---
--
..--
I ,c~- I
I
J--1. I I
--1-1-' L1I1I
I I I T-n-rl
I I I
I
i i i
!-t-W
I I
! 1 !
! i
I i
lJ
i
i
I
I :
I i
II'I
E. ~ ~ ec-\- \' .\1 Q..
-::s \.A r. ~ ~
\ cqq 'l.
If
\
t
I
II,1/NSTny OF
Of/TAR/I)
HI6HWAYS
Ei..-GIN COUNTY
ELGIN COUNTY GRAVEL ROADS
TOWNSHIP ROADS (Paved)
( Grovel)
OTHfR COUNTY ROADS
~'.=:L
~~
r:=r::::r::::I
MlOOl..ESEX
IIo!
4
SCALES
MILES
IMPERIAL
METRIC
REVISED: MARCH /.
57:
THOMAS
SUBURBAN
SU BUR BAN AREA ROADS
f. ~ ~ e.C"\- ~ \i'~ -S'^~~ ~ \ 0\ q 2
/fA It'~':1 f f
'I . !
~//!i/I!
I . I . I ; I l__! /,
i ..// '1. EXrCfI! ! 1_' ~.'"
f ! \" II ! Ii!.
! / 1/ ~~~ftt. oU?1t / !
! / f?0401
~- i 110
"'~,
'--<.....
----J.
I
RAILWAYS
TOWNSHIP BOUNDARIES
COUNTY BOUNDARIE 5
CITY - TOWN BOUNDARIES
COUNTY ADMINISTRATION OFFICES
450 SUNSET DRIVE
ST THO MAS N 5 R 5 V I
o
2
3
5
6
4
l( 11_0
AREA
ROAD
SYSTE4
II
..~~~~~--_.~. ,"'.:""
.,.""..... -- ~-_.-.",--"
---
... II
1l ~..
1111
II .. II ..
.-
-
--~ll,D ~J~~~ tJ~
~. ".~. \~~~ 1\ ~ ~ ('I '" .
~~ I'!~.J ~"'Ul~ '
, ~\~~. : l~
~ ~ ~j l'~~
""f ~.~ t"~ ~t \~. ~ ~
\-.-. ~.'''~ '~. '11
"~.~~ .~~tt~ .
~t\'t' ~""l\<l ... }Q
~Y\ ~ ~ l ): t ~ l t' f: 1
-lr t. ?\ ~, .. 'l.. il
~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ " ," ~ 1'\J
:c'i ,( ~ t~. ~ t ~ t
~~ }~~ ~~
* tr ~~' ~ ' ~ Jl
~~ ~-\r ~.::
~ J ~ tt
'"
~
~ ~
~
"'"
~
"'"
~ ~ ~
~t R ~
~ '.-""\
~
~
f;;
C)
~
~
I
~
... ,.