Loading...
January 13, 2015 Special County Council Meeting Agenda PackageElgin ORDER 1st 2nd 3rd 4th ORDERS OF THE DAY SPECIAL COUNCIL FOR TUESDAY, JANUARY 13, 2015 - P.M. Meeting Called to Order Disclosure of Pecuniary Interest and the General Nature Thereof Motion to Move Into "Committee Of The Whole Council" Presenting Delegations and Reports 1. Duncan McKinlay, Chair of SWIFT (Southwestern Integrated Fibre Technology) and Geoff Hogan, Director of Information Technology, County of Grey with PowerPoint presentation. (attached) 2 PowerPoint presentation from General Manager of Economic Development titled "County -wide Community Improvement Plan ". (attached) 3. Report from Director of Homes and Seniors Services titled "Background Report — Terrace Lodge Redevelopment ". (attached) 4. Dwight Lander, Managing Architect, MMMC Architects with PowerPoint presentation titled "Terrace Lodge Redevelopment" and Terrace Lodge Proposed New 100 Bed Long -Term Care Home Schematic Design Report. (attached) 5. PowerPoint presentation from Chief Administrative Officer and Director of Financial Services titled "2015 Fiscal Outlook ". (attached) 5th DISCUSSION /DIRECTION 6th OTHER BUSINESS 1) Statements /Inquiries by Members 2) Notice of Motion 3) Matters of Urgency Closed Meeting Item Motion to Rise and Report Motion to Adopt Recommendations from the Committee Of The Whole Consideration of By -Law ADJOURNMENT 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th NOTICE: CASUAL DRESS PERMITTED Deputy Warden for January Deputy Warden for February January 27, 2015 February 10, 2015 February 22 - 25, 2015 November 27, 2015 Councillor Marr Councillor Mennill County Council Meeting — 9:00 a.m. County Council Meeting — 9:00 a.m. 2015 ROMA/OGRA Combined Conference - (Fairmont Royal York — Toronto) 2015 Warden's Banquet — Vienna Community Centre 1 11111111pH uuuuuuulll11111 d,puq Illllllliij 11111111111 imr 41 `0p i ON N LL E ' (1.) i i' ca O � ., v +�-1 3 V) m C O O O •— �p'viU� '47, co L) co U '(O ca 'c 1- 4-I N N C v) =Npp•ca NNCa CO U H '.c ," •� iA� °C COa) .°T2 a5 000 ••' i Q•— U N L- C) �- Coa) 0^np i� _C CQ C N U C cp = c6 +-, a..+ �� 01 J (1) O 4)-C co 4) Southwest Ontario has over 3 Million people - -10% of Canada's population M 1 VIII 111111 � 1111uw 1�11� r � 1 111 111111 1 111111111111111 1 1r�1 �,l�� m 1 III � 111111 11111 uuuuuu 1 mi I11I o 11 1 f 111 11 ll 11111111111 . 031— = Q a--+ U U , cn • — D � O c o o >,=I/cc LI/cc 0 O 1-OU,T)O cu 'E V ca > -2 ,� co DO tao , =� Q (,. G >'U cu ca�0�� C " c C CD CO c � 0 iA L7 O O 0 0 U U . M U • ■ o cn c • oTuucu > Q WL_N.EuD a - C :IL= * U O QOOD" ,Q >-.I o>--+ a) 0 PO: =p cU O cu > RE E+ _c) >w.Ov'� O O NQ� of dwgEN - =- (AN (1) C2� �O= ca =�. =UCa Oc°Vc4 COM a- =OHUm�'m00 CIO a a) U 0 cn rcs rcs CIO U a) E 0 U 0 0 0 0 0 U I VIII III III I II' 11111 fi1l 'II� III 111111�11111 JI ��1f+7 /�� I 11111111111 � ��' u1 k � 1 , , Ijig IIIII i i 1 �uu i lllll���illlido uuuuuullllll l l 111lllllllii IVUU,,,,, iuuI ■■ 0 • 0 _() 0 CC) 0 11111 ..I1.1 III 11..111.1.1111111111 1. 1111'110M 110 '1111;6) mom „Iir,i8i.:IIIII111111111111111,111 'Ile 111'11 Hj/1#26ge, ::<:-/:(fil;41.2:,:;,7'.1 • A 11 I 1111111111111 11111111111 II III H 11111 1 II I Il IIm III 11111111111111111111 11111111 1111111111111 1 1 11 11 IIIIIfil 111111 01 1111 11 11111111 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 111111111111 1 1110m1111111 1111111 1 11111 III 11111111 111111111111111 1 II 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111illffiffiffili 111111111111 1 11111 1 1 1 11111 1 1111 1111 1 II 11 111111111111111 1 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111PI 1 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIImilliml 1111111111 m11111111111mil III I II 1 1111111111 1111111111 1 111111 Ill 11111111 1111 1111 1 0 _c) 0 c 0 0 0 c 0 A, Cpt m zation I NTELL iGE T (1) • (1) a; 5L) -0 Q.) -0 me • as 1) 00 11101101 I miioi nvestment, E Q VI VI 0 U Ill, uuuw % 1IG % % / / / /G / / „ „, „,/ „11111111111JJ1J ' ,� 111 � 11 iiiii �lIIII ,, oo0000000 0 000000000 Ln M m N Ln �N -1 1 0 0 I VIII IIIIIIII 111 JJl III III III �ff1111111111 1 J� 111 �// 1” 11111 III 1111 11,1111111 III ����;I I��������� I II '����II�'11�l11�����'������ III 1111 1111 11111111111111111111111111111 � N• Q 0 W 0 Fibre air;,, 1,,. II * 0 * 0 PI 0 Lii i 0 N o CU 0 0 N i N Ln Evaluation Criteria Immunity to interference (atmospheric or EMI) Power consumption per user (Watts) 1 Bandwidth (Information Carrying Capacity Q 0 0 N To a) 0 U 0 To 4) U 4) t E 0 — f0 Q 4) f0 U 4) t 0 1 111111111111111111111111 // 111111 „I„,1iiili ij 1111111 111111111 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 Illlmw 1111111 1) (I)" -a . > 0 0 E 0 0 O ca C V -a v) c -0 v) a) 2 C) 4-; a) v) O N a)" co 4—J 73 V � ca c 0 ca • • _C) .N a� LL Problems identified N V) 0 V) c6 0 LI- M) - �A a) Q C co d) ru0 E _a Q O ca v) • N cn a) i L- CD m O z -o CD CU CU c E ca - }, LL CU CU •_ o E • 1 VIII 111111 1 �(��( »l��� mm11111 ill III lffl111111111 11(1 1 ih � � ; ! ii llli; i IIl�! 111111111111 � i111�111j II 1 11 ,c(13 • Q U 0") • N Ca V >` Ca V) Q 0 CO C C < • >% 0 CT C w CU CU CU 0 >, Ca •— CU Q CT E • CU _0 0 = Z D U N„ r ul�p�u�� IIIII@I@ Wlury�ry�� � uuuuuuum ^l�iuu Iq�'µMN w���NMI ANY N'NNUUU I! mumff�i ) V co 0 • LO I VIII 1111111 1 HI 111111 �I r�� ������� ����11111��� 1 �11!��rr��� PEI I �� 1 it 11 f �1I1 111111 ������������ ��I I!! � ih a�I�„ I��llllll!�!III�N!����� 1 �!1! �IIII� 1»�l� „„111,111,1111111111111111111111111 „ .„ J 110100g JJ1J111,(111.,1J11,(1i11111111111rt' O U O O Ca 0 .0 O -0 U O O (1) O •U > _a O 0 0_ v ^^, W co 0) v, W co W • L� -C O 7 a)� > _O o_ E •O — 4'3 a) cm }O O O O 0 ID -a 0- a, � ca - c O 4- `i= O .0 O LLI- W > ca Cn � 0) 1 11111 1111111 11 1 111111111111 J li11 11>U1111111111 �II 11111111. �, III�;����������� �II�I �ll1jl�1 0 a� voy loll 1111111111111111 • 0 0) 0 • • O V) U CO 4J O E cc • • • Shared Services a) • • • ti 1 VIII 1111111 h 1 1�11���rrrr 11P L'l1ff1111h1 1 1 11111111111 f1H l IIi11 i 1l'11�1 ll�ll ����1�11 ����11,1I��;��P,�������� �I�I �llrIllr J N U c O a � z O N 2 Lli m O CL) 0 0 N VI 0 V lI Capital $234M a) V) O U a) N U Q 4--+ U a) O U O '(/- LI- O 0 m v c - (a = E N 2 • Lli o O CLO (a s- v a) Q O O a) -0 c a) O U o Total $243.5M Federal $81M Provincial $81M O O N Municipal $16M ao 111111 1111111 II ll1 J((J1 11 1111111111 1�ill 111111 11/1111111 1 �� I �1l� � � � �l 11i11� I lIIJ 1�,�� V� 1.1.1.1.1.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.111 11111 ,p1,11,11ti"J":"111B"J'Iltilliii"J'tilr, 1 1'1'111 111 11111111111 1 11111111111111111111111111111'111111q111 w .0 0 4-1 • _ . (L) 0 V 0_ 4-1 s s 0 4-1 ca w w co 4-1 s s 0 0 N 1 VIII 111111 I1'R'y, � 111 11111111111111111111 + �II 1� rII ll �»h I 1111 1'�I 11 III III I1J1ff111 111111 1 r � III III� III 1iih�m J1 , : I� 1l �11I 'IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIno 0 I 0 0 a. 'cys:s:! rte, 0 ,_ Q) U oi rol ii_ N N N N I . 6 o u • O (D E 4-; c cu-c5 E cu > 75 o N > c c O ▪ V O V co cu a) ' V ID •O La E .0 a) E O O CU i ID O CD 73 a> tj 0 co c 5 O V O V •-N� O c 0 ca cn a) �0 I a) • O cu 0_ 0_ o_ V Ca cu c b.O c ). 03 V CO O a� co • O CI p O Vi V N N 111111 1111111 h 1 1I11���rrrr 1(1;1 �' 11ff 111111111 1 11111111111 f1i l 111111 i 1l>u�111111 ����1�11 111111,1I�1;���I,1�111111 �I�I �llIll J c O .j Q • c 0 • U U 0 a) a) * co \V c (1) .0 ^ >, E^iD, W W 0 N N �NAL co 4, 0 • U 0 4J 0 w Member Total 0 CC Non refundable contribution Refundable contribution Total member contribution $ 162,000,000 Federal & Provincial Share Private Sector Share O 00 227,000,000 Total $ leveraged N N N Model ** - Elgin contributes Ol 0 CO CO CO > O 0 0 45 O 0 *L 0 U 0 f0 O co 0- w 492 = N c co O U L CU -a � > CO O Q Q L Q O w 0 U O f0 c f6 _ (1) 4- CO CO O • O -Ow -0 as ▪ a▪ s 111111 11111111 11 1 1'11�� �rrrr 1P L'111ff111111111 1 11111111111 f1i l 111111 i 1l'�111111 ����1�11 11111111I�1;��P,1�111111 �I�I �llIll J 01 rl V ,- L. • ca _0 O V E - 1— a, c LL V � CU Q g C C/i -0 ca CU CCU to '— 0 E b.0 -0 c ca O o E 2 v-1 .- V U `~ CO V) O 0 O = O - O ca CO , V V L.I. X _ U w CU 73 (f) Z C L1J • • • • Funding announcement (est Q1 2015) 0 V CO CO 0 E co O -a • 0 • RFI /RFP Q2 -Q3 2015 N 1 VIII 111111 11 I � a , 1 ��1I 1 I "' jl� � uuuuuu� ' ll�� ll 1 1 , � ,JlI11,������� V th L W C 0 th N i .N U c 0 _ _co co • co i, O E �--= th N - N L o O L (6 .0 O Q - L O cr) 70 N L a--+ 0 L v) W --+ N • • • J ✓ I • IIPdu • • • ( ) III • • • uuu11uuw3 �uu�ouu� W 'W „' „W i„ 1111 wll� u1111,7111 WiIII 011' III nno • ( ) (VIII wll� III („,1110”) III • • • • III 11111, • • • • • • • • • • 111111 111111111 'R'y, � II1 111 r� 1 + I1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 I1 r � I �1 �'11 l 111 111 Iff111 11111 1llr � 1 � �� l��� III 1 1111 I 1 � � jj ' 0 U 0 c • 0 CI ID C CO • (1) 0 0 1:a11111111I111111111111111 • • • cu 03 • C L ci- E 0 -0 V c C� a) tap G � _c 0 �, tap W W L- • 0 CD CD V C cn CO CD CO • • N I VIII 11111111 III 11 � �h ��'����r 1rrr 1111 1'111'11' 11111 „ 111 Ill' 1 f „.1 i�1 11 1 ,1 � 111 1 1 l 11 l I ,f II 11111 i 1 U O N GOVERNMENT D 0 PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT 0 0 � F � m u OTHER GOVERNMENT FUNDING SERVICE PROVIDERS LARGE TELECOM COMPANIES CABLE COMPANIES NETWORK BUILD 0 0 D X W U u V J LU O U.! w u U • HYDRO UTILITIES NON DOMINANT CARRIERS APPLICATION SERVICE PROVIDERS 00 N 1 VIII 11111111 Ell" 111E1 , 11111 11 1 III III II 111111111111111 11111111 Immilmmmmommmmmmmmmmmmmmll 111111111111 1111 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111111,h 11 11 ���ih ��1� � � 11 1 11111111 1111 111 11111111II!11111 I 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 ! 1111 /IJJJ� 1�� t LL 0 N October 2013 November 2012 Feasibility Study lao November 2015 September 2015 RFI /RFPs issued to providers February 2016 December 2015 Providers MSA /SLAs signed lao February 2016 N 0) End state report completed lao March 2016 February 2016 Detailed operating plan lao March 2016 Marketing plan completed December 2020 January 2016 Deployment completed 6) N 111111 111111 " 11111111 11111 III 11111) IIIIIIIIIIIII ��ir lrrrlr ���� 111111 111111,1 1h 11 bi m 1 11,1 1�,�� r rift a 1111111111111111111111111111 E 4 0 11111111,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1 IIII((, J�IVf� umuuuuuul 0 0 uuuuu uuuuu Rehm 111111 ll1 mt U r M bltt'! 6 YJ�tS, ''1f(7uj rel I 1 1111111!!!!!!!!!!!! 1111111 Forr mluuuum. 11111111111111111111111111N E E 0 U nu-IL 0 um� 11111 1111111111111111111111111 • • • 0 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIk IlmmIIII1,,,,I • 0000000000000000 1 N Cr) ril"''i(lbij 11111111,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1 IIII�. �01II�r 0 E . a . - . 0 • .4■l • • 111111 11111111111111111111111111 • 0 u 1- 0 co Cr) Cr) 11111111,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1 hh•hoft4.j 1111111 FA w 0 C,- 0 CD c—nns hnhp D a) co ci z 1111111!!!!!!!!!!!! FANO IIII�, J�Illff N C • 0 `al) c c c • • E E �..� Q r i1 • • • CD VIII 1111111111111111111111111 IIIIIII- VIII (f) IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII. • C.? • • M `''1fl7uj 1 IP 17gnnmmny Oni IIII�, J�IVf� IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII _ s epp+ _ ss% ( Q) U- 0 = Cf3 = E C..) lllll llllllllllllllllllllll 1111 ■IY 0 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII -m uJ �E L uuuuuuum■1 umlillm I CT u W C3 u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u m u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u c 0 • c 0 uuuuuuuuuuuuuuum = 0 (i) n"4 tei rOf Vied rrrr AtO peg haak REA ogst 1- 111111 111111111111111111111111111 o �> E (i) _c 0 (73 1— 0 a) i 0 • 11111111111111111 11111111111, co cp co ti M BrA `''1fl7uj 1 it AA 11 4 fn tesisssAi l1 IIII111 , FA E 0 E 0 0 a) cp C.} (1) 0 • 0 00 M `''1fl7uj REPORT TO COUNTY COUNCIL FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Rhonda L. Duffy, Director of Homes and Seniors Services Clayton Watters, Director of Engineering Services Jim Bundschuh, Director of Financial Services January 5, 2015 Background Report - Terrace Lodge Redevelopment INTRODUCTION: This report is intended to provide Council members with the history and background information on previous decisions and resolutions made by Council concerning the redevelopment of Terrace Lodge. DISCUSSION: Beginning in 2006, Council gave direction to explore planning options for the redevelopment of Terrace Lodge. Possible options discussed included; a new building, renovate Terrace Lodge one wing at a time and continue to retrofit the existing structure to meet the changing needs of the residents. The Architectural Firm of Murphy and Murphy were contracted to prepare a cost analysis report on the options. Some of the challenges discussed with a retrofit /renovation included but were not limited to: • Disruption to care and displacement of residents • Lengthy period of time to renovate rooms - would have to relocate 25 residents at a time • Cost prohibitive in absence of provincial funding Council approved in principle, as the preferred option, the construction of a new Terrace Lodge. Council directed staff to develop a long -term capital plan to finance the eventual construction of the new facility for consideration by the incoming Council in 2007. After Council reviewed in 2007, it was later determined that cost estimates were significantly higher than anticipated and in the absence of adequate provincial funding opted to continue to set funds aside annually in anticipation of a future funding announcement. It was not until 2009, that the Ministry of Health and Long Term Care announced funding opportunities, however once again funding was not adequate and the rebuild option was not pursued. There were no further funding announcements until late 2014. In February 2014, Council selected MMMC Architects Inc. to develop preliminary designs for renovations /retrofit to Terrace Lodge. 39 May 2014, County Council approved a "preliminary" plan design for renovations to Terrace Lodge. June 2014, MMMC provided preliminary renovation plans and directed staff to proceed to the next phase of development. The final adoption of that plan was contingent upon incorporating feasible recommendations from residents, family, staff and members of the community. August 2014, after obtaining input from residents, family and staff, a public open house was organized to collect final input prior to reporting back to Council. September 2014, feedback from residents, family, staff and the public open house with comments /concerns reported to Council. Several concerns which surfaced related to renovations were: • Disruption to resident care and comfort • Displacement of residents from their home • Lengthy period of time to renovate rooms (could only renovate four rooms at a time) therefore it would be several years to complete all renovations Additionally there are other Ministry of Health designs requirements which may influence Council's decision of rebuild versus retrofit including but not limited to: • Inability to achieve maximum funding; if the home does not meet "A" classification it would mean a reduction in construction funding and the base monthly accommodation payments. • Adding to the length of a wing may not meet minimum distance requirements to outdoor access, i.e., 200 ft. requirement from resident room to dining /lounge area. These areas a grouped together at the beginning of the resident wing /home area to avoid infection control concerns with food traveling through resident room hallways. • Adding a second washroom on exterior of building would not improve resident living space or privacy within the existing room. • Adding "new" rooms to wings would create two different standards of accommodation without changing the per diem. It was not until the end of 2014 that the Ministry of Health and Long Term Care communicated an impending funding announcement. Suggested, although not official, a funding per diem has been communicated through the Ontario Association of Homes and Services for Seniors which has been used as an "estimate" for budgetary purposes. The cost of construction, including fees and costs for outfitting the building, is estimated at $29.7 million. The cost to repay a loan for this investment will be approximately $47 million if financed over 25 years. The province will provide funding towards the construction paid annually for 25 years totalling only $19 million. As a result 60% of the construction cost is being downloaded onto the County by the province. In addition, it is expected some of the inflationary increases for ongoing operational expenses will also be downloaded by the province. Although inflation is running at approximately 2 %, it is likely that the province will 40 only provide 1% funding increases going forward. These downloads from the province are likely the result of the province redirecting some of its financial resources away from Long - Term Care to their Aging At Home strategy. As a result, the County will need to finance these downloaded costs on the backs of its ratepayers with the net effect requiring a further 6% tax increase ($80 per average household). Unfortunately, the province's Aging At Home strategy means that the required level of care of future residents entering the Homes will be even greater than it is today, potentially adding further costs on County ratepayers. CONCLUSION: A variety of options from renovating the existing rooms to provide greater comfort to residents, to adding on rooms to existing corridors, to attaching an addition, to building a completely new facility on the existing site have been explored. In the end, after much deliberation and input from residents, stakeholders, council and others, the overriding factors influencing the decision to obtain up -to -date cost estimates on a new facility are as follows: 1) Minimal disruption to and no displacement of residents 2) Maximizes provincial revenue 3) Creates one standard of accommodation, comparable to the county's other two facilities 4) Meets the Class A Ministry designation RECOMMENDATION: THAT Council provide direction on the schematic design for the rebuild of Terrace Lodge; and, THAT staff report back to Council once final contributions from the Ministry of Health and Long Term Care are determined. All of which is Respectfully Submitted Approved for Submission Rhonda L. Duffy Mark G. McDonald Director of Homes and Seniors Services Chief Administrative Officer Clayton Watters Director of Engineering Services Jim Bundschuh Director of Financial Services 41 a) E eL I) 0) -a 0 a) 0 CD La5 Progre_ssive by Nature . . . _. , - _,-.i• ,01,, , ,,.. ,,, I T±-MMCARCHITFCTs7 Cr) Photograph of Existing Terrace Lodge (a a) Terrace Lodge Redeve'pi m .it Sections are as follows; ÷E' a) u) E E) E (1) o_ a3 - 2 E 7I- (1) roc) u c, a) 71- P .5 6 a) 2 ("u 0 T Z.c) (' L- rp o 5 (1) CD u) E 0 co (s() sa) a) 0_ cp c o co _c u) o a) 2 o_ LCT5 CY) CO 0 U) D 8 o_ a) >. E o E --. Dcu),,o(L13 t a) a.) - .(7) E E u) D D C • — a) 2 _cotioc p c co - (D > u) < 2 12L E 2 D (D E1Y3 a)÷o'cuSco-0 cr) 0 cc3 0 0 co < D c (73EL>,(020- L(1) 0_ _c a) _I (1) OC 0 2 t u) u) ° a3 _c a) -o c co u) i• .(1)u) _(1)E(1) ID -0 0 0 T.) (I) -C c _._, co a) D • — (1) E -b- oa)coD . _ cr) c o c7U) CO c 1..il l- a) a) CL • • CL • • • • • • 6. 6 .— c.; 0- 0 c*" o 0 0) _c a) 0 P L_ c ._E = a3 0_ -Z.> .— 0 c 0 f5 P V2 a) D 0 .77) CZ C CO -0 0 0_ c 0 2 >, a) 0 0 0- co 0 0 > c r n - 0_ t (I) ' ' ' U) 0 c 0 (I) 0 a) a3 0 D 00 U_ (7) C (1) >, u) • > D 0 0) C 0 CO c 0 CZ O- . D C U) C (13 c O 0 CC3 0 0 J -0 WD p -0 ÷E' u) < u) co ow a) < < L- 33 1 C 1 fY • E • (f) 6 d) 6 CD -I-, 0 E . _ X CN CY) CN CO 0 E a.) > -(7) a) (13 c _c -773 O) 5 c0 6 EPL! a§ g :1: > &3 ENP 8ms m 0 ooi tf5 E • c a) a) > LL Ct • 0 O C .5= L'DOz o_ r r (EittaffilffatigalffaMEIEMMIEEMMCIEWMIMAMMCIEMEKIEWMEEEKIIIIESINdif C 0 .1■1 c) C) 0 0 Co 0 C) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Co Co 0 CO 0 LO 0 Co LO N— C. ocic O N- 1.6 0 I C\I 0 C\I N N d" O1 LC) N- N N CO 0 CO Cr) N- N- CO CO V) - - - '7r - IC) 09- EJ9- 09- 09- OS- 09- Cl) m E (K1 a) z ,, 0 C. (0 , -,-.. -,-. a) 0 co c) u) Ce v 0 N 0 co C 0 0 a) o u) o 0 E u) o) = o = 0 c 2 0) E •c 0 .— -o = c 0 o 5- (/) (,) E 0 0 a) 71- /4-• co -0 :c) C Z — C >, a) o , C0 0 — •§ L) )= oc 7)c (_) ... c a o 0 . o .- < ve ca ) > •- o 73 - Imo Li a) co cc L- L- 0 c o 7 o o E -. ct C C -0 0 I 2 To ^ E -au- -au- 8 6-) 73 =c0 ,0 .E= i > "u2' a) La .. c F.,o 2 >> o .-u) o c - ., octo c c < el c (1) 0 0 = c " C H Z Z Arii (i) 0 0 ID -0 -0 -0 -C!) C TO CO CO a) = a) o 1 O " o (1) = 0 0 CO 0 —I CO CO < < < CO 0 I— I— 0- I- 00 (EittaffilffallgatiffaMEIEMMIEEMMCIEffallgatiffaMCIEMEKIEdffaffElldatiadttrite E w L_ 71" (D CT -0 a) > N -C C 0 , C Co 0 a) a) E CO co CO /1- ,(C) 0 0 a.) 14- C 0 a) 2 o) CO E 0 C2. Cu 0 44- to C C (1) p c 0_ CO 17; -ci _c) QD (1) u.) E E C E ou) E, - 0 1 0 0 -1-• C C■1 c() o c a) p a) "r7ii P 8 0 0 co C > 0 . s_ CO , .2 " Ti) _ o sa) o co U) o .0 0 E o a) E C _ cl -o 0 o L, 4_ P —' 0 (D CO _c 2 C co co 0 a) c a) CD A-° CO _c > o) a) ci) W CC3 -o a) C (D p 1-.) a) 2 " o . _ o C 0) 0) C , c a) 2 n co .-.-, 0 •3 E p n co _o _c L-,,,, o a) co c n C3") W .,,,irr'l (f) CO C in F— .1 -C3 ■1■--.... S.- 1 • • • • • • 0 fl a) al _C C H 0 0) a) tf5 C a) E o_ 0 T.) a) 0 a) 711 o "5 m L.) co 0 iG t 1 " 0 0 0 L W Z 1:5 CD- W 2 O O nO Or LL 0_ - L a) Q W c L O -`^ L L.L u) co Terrace Lodge Redevelopment ' ' 111111.. 111111111111. • Aerial View of Proposed Building From South Terrace Lodge Redevelopment 7i(egitffEllitittilftffdifftiffittflittetilliffritE11111111/11/111111ffiltillitiffrillittilti ((LEA (Cs delffli \ 41; H.,2,11k 0 0 Overall Building Floor Plans Terrace Lodge Redevelopment teMEMEMEffittaffallfitaffElEMEM111111EffaffittiffallECEMEIMEIMIlleti, 0 0 R`,f1 r tro , w 0< 0 (.9 o HC1 Z Li uJ eL Z z w LU 0 2 1- z Lu Z z Common / Public Areas Terrace Lodge Redevelopment .7r LC) View From Great Room Toward Chapel Terrace Lodge Redevelopment .111111111111111111111111 , smoussmoosionoiwif 1.1 Ui rie „.. I I 1 H11111111111111111111111111 kitAMC ARCHITE q View From Chapel Toward Great Room Terrace Lodge Redevelopment WieMdtatitallittatittliffilittittlitifilitittliffilittillatiffillatilittEllitilittattliffe 1.1i1;111111 7:11/41; 14, '11 161'41V4 wig& r i"',111"Ir - 1100) w uJ 1- 0) w L.L. 0 L LL Z 110 < a t a w Ct D 0 04: 17 0 0 (C) Administration, Staff & Service Areas Terrace Lodge Redevelopment /./16,t iikididasuid(titifirtittictidtatiwititi6 V' z , (1, OoNFAK, › , ' w z z El) oa 2 1100000101100 111#111,,, A ( 111 Typical Resident Home Area Terrace Lodge Redevelopment 111111111111 ;1110 Iii1111111, .1' ///,411111111111 F:„e;iftia,VIC44 Lil CD c. CC e 00 Typical RHA Dining Room Terrace Lodge Redevelopment ‘((//dite(dif(gletat(tallitittlittlittillittilittealftl&Ilititt 11 ,11111:1111111. i °I°1'11.1;!1°'?'11 ' ,11.1,11.111,1111111'.11111'0.11101111'11111''11111111.1.11.11..1'1.1.:111..1.. ''. ,.,,..., 11{.....1...,,,.1.(1.1...,::„..1) 41' i.°i 1 11(;,.1111.1,.P1,.',11,,1,11, r'''' 11.1.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11.11. ,,,.1.,::„..::::,.:,„:,.. i,' , :1111'111111:.'11'1,.11.:....1;1 „,„.....,"..„(1.1,1„..1): .1°H1.10.11.0.0....L"01,,,,,,, .1.11„, •,",,,,' .1......1,10 loll 000000001010111..1110:1..111.11..1.11...,.10..)..,.11.,.11.:..111,..11:1..11,.1..1„..„).„ 1111111111111111 1 Weittfiettrittlifittlitittaittlititgattlittlittertifitto 116cu,,,,11111 """"""""'''''"11•1111111:11r111111114.111111111111111111111111111.1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111kk000... ..„1:1•J'ill1111,1111111111111111,111,111111111111111111111111111111 01111111111,11111:11,111,111,11171110.1,11,11111m, „....jr!i1:11111011111101!"!1,111111:.111111„1111111,1!111111111111111111111111111g11'11i1” .,.11•:;!:1::,•!1!:1,■111111111111111',111111:11111111111111111P11;1 in ill] 100 I 1011 111111111111111111 00000000000000001 1111111111111111111111111111111 111111 111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111111111111111111 11111111111 1111111111111111111111111111111111111 1111111111111111111111111111111111111 1111111111111 Proposed New Redevelopment Strategy Previous Redevelopment Strategy Typical Two Bed Bedroom Views Terrace Lodge Redevelopment dd?dd 't 1,1,1 11111111111 Proposed Two Bed Bedroom Existing Two Bed Bedroom Typical Two Bed Bedroom Entry Views CLASS C ESTIMATE Terrace Lodge Redevelopment ittettlittlitittelttittellttlettlitellittittittettitelliglifftelltiffategattlitedgettritenh, EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Description GFA (SF) $/SF Estimated Cost A CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE 1 Building and Site Development 85,111 $260 522,113,000 2 Design/ Estimating Contingency - 8% INCLUDED 3 Escalation to Jan 2016 - 3% 5663 000 4 Post Contract ( construction ) Contingency - 5% $1,139,000 Subtotal A $23 915 000 B Cash Allowances - to be confirmed (Not included in A Above) 1 Kitchen Equipment $1 000 000 2 Laundry Equipment $100,000 3 Testing and Inspection $100,000 4 Nurse Cali - Budget provided by Owner $255,000 Phone, TV, CTV, WiFi„ Door Controls - Budget 5 $525000 provided by Owner 6 Wanderguard - Budget provided by Owner $10,000 Subtotal B $1 990 000 A+B Estimated Construction Cost ( 85,111 $304 $25,905,000 excluding I-1ST ) u E LU 1-1 LLI kip fr) 0 0 U1 tY1 c0 0 0 0 0 4—, E •.1 cp 0 Lfl r‘l a.) 71° 0 0 N Lfl ft 0 0 3— 0 3— 0 0 U_ § CID 70 c o 0 .c n_ a 0 CD CD -Uft Lc) 0 0 0 New Building Construction Costs Terrace Lodge Redevelopment Construction Costs (from estimate Q $22,113,000 1 Building & Site Development W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (NI a,' Lf) O O O Lf7 Lf7 O U LO (fl -1 0 0 o Lfl N ri C LO r-1 al 0 r-1 r-1 N Ul t/} ih' 3 Escalation to January 2016 - 3% Conti ngency - 5% Post Contract /Bid (construction a4+ Cash Allowances i) to E UJ E 0 UJ E 5 0 W UJ t U c-1 CG 2 Laundry Equipment (from estimate) 3 Testing & Inspection (from estimate) 4 Nurse Call (Owner Supplied Information) 5 Phone, TV, CTV, WiFi, Door Controls (Owner Supplied Information) Owner Supplied Information) 6 Wanderguard 0 0' a4+ Soft (Project) Costs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O N N O O O O O u N u1 O 0 0 0 ri V} LO N N 0 L!7 Ul t/} t/} t/} Ol N t/} ri ri t/} Furnishings, Fittings & Equipment @ $15,000 per bed r-1 AV equipment (not included in above) (Owner Supplied Information) 2 Site Plan Review& Agreement (Owner Supplied Information) 4 Building Permit Review Fees (Owner Supplied Information) 6 Consultant Fees - 7% (placeholder for budget purposes only) 7 Staff Training 0 2 co 0 0 0 ++S S2 Project Contingency (To Be Determined) Terrace Lodge Redevelopment „,dirYaitteittftlfetelleilettlettittittittillor New Terrace Lodge LTC Home RFP No. 2013 -15 New Building Draft Project Schedule Terrace Lodge Redevelopment (1) 0 • 5 m 0 L- 1 -c75 co E) -o "0 U) C 0 -C 0 • CO CO 4.- .4 C u) (/) co 0 a) t5 2 0 4-. 0 0 . -I-, CT) CI 0 X CD 0) 0 L- >, a CZ -in — 2) C.) 1) E a) . a) _a .._i E (i) co ÷E' E 1 2 2 E) p c (t s_ D s_ D 0) CO -0 C) C) 0 NO (/) 0 U) U) - - (N c E p p (1) E a) a) a) a) _c 73 0 o o R x x "5 2 c`-0 0 0 CO TO g 3 _ w w 7 w wr. a) a) 5 CD 0 a) a) 2 a) a) 2 2 0_ Benefits of New Building 11".601not co a) 0 t° 'H 1111111"1'111111111 111111,11. Terrace Lodge Proposed New 100 Bed Long -Term Care Home Schematic Design Report January 2015 Prepared by MMMC Inc. Architects With Tacoma Engineers Millennium Engineering Ltd. Diverse Technical Services Van Velzan + Radchenko Design Associates Ltd. Turner & Townsend 66 Terrace Lodge Proposed New 100 Bed Long -Term Care Home Table of Contents: Acknowledgements 1.0 Executive Summary 2.0 Background 3.0 Programme 4.0 Codes & Standards 5.0 Design Studies and Options 6.0 Selected Design 6.1 Architecture 6.2 Structure 6.3 Mechanical & Electrical 6.4 Civil 6.5 Food Service 7.0 Schedule 8.0 Class `C' Construction Costs Estimate 9.0 Total Project Costs iARCHMITS 67 Schematic Design Report Terrace Lodge Proposed New 100 Bed Long -Term Care Home ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS MMMC Inc. Architects acknowledges the following contributors for their participation in the schematic design process; Architectural: MMMC Inc. Architects Brantford, ON Structural: Tacoma Engineers Guelph, ON Mechanical: Millennium Engineering Ltd. Burlington, ON Electrical: Millennium Engineering Ltd. Burlington, ON Site Services: Diverse technical Services Hamilton, ON Food Services: Van Velzan Radchenko Toronto, ON Cost Consultant: Turner & Townsend Toronto, ON Terrace Lodge Design Team: Rhonda Duffy, Director of Homes & Senior Services Clayton Watters, Director of Engineering Services Jim Carter, Manager of Corporate Facilities Cole Aicken, Building Sciences Technologist Jim Bundschuh, Director of Finance ARcHnurs 68 Schematic Design Report Terrace Lodge Proposed New 100 Bed Long -Term Care Home 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report explores design parameters and options for the redevelopment of the existing 100 bed Terrace Lodge long -term care home operated by the County of Elgin and located at 49462 Talbot Line in the Township of Malahide, Ontario. The Terrace Lodge Design Team's chosen option has been completed to a schematic level of design with input from architectural, structural, mechanical, electrical, site servicing and food service consultants. A Class `C' cost estimate has also been prepared for the chosen design. Constructed approximately 30 years ago, the existing Terrace Lodge building was classified as a `C' home in 1998 by the Ministry of Health and Long -Term Care ( MOHLTC). This classification deems Terrace Lodge to be below the provincial standards for long -term care accommodations. Some features of the existing home that give it this rating are; 1. Insufficient area in bedrooms, 2. Narrow bedroom entrance doors, 3. Too little space around beds for access, 4. Lack of accessible space in ensuite washrooms for wheelchair maneuvering, 5. Four residents per ensuite washrooms in some rooms. (2 max. permitted), 6. Lack of dining space within each resident home area (RHA), 7. Lack of sufficient lounge and program /activity space on the RHAs. The MOHLTC `C' Classification must not be confused with the Class `C' Cost Estimate. These are two separate things. The MOHLTC `C' Classification rates the physical characteristics of the home for its compliance to the current ministry Design Standards. An `A' Classified home meets the Standards fully; a `C' Classified home has a number of deficiencies or features that do not meet the full Standards. A Class `C' Cost Estimate is a cost estimate level that has been prepared based on a set of preliminary design documents for a building. Please refer to Section 2 for a full definition of a Class `C' Cost Estimate. Due to the `C' Classification the ministry has given to Terrace Lodge, the MOHLTC , through a process of redevelopment, requires that the home correct its design deficiencies by either; a) renovating and /or adding to the home, or b) constructing a new home. To bring the existing home up to `A' Classification Standards, the existing building would need to be redeveloped to eliminate all deficiencies, including, but not limited to, the seven listed above. Since residents would be directly affected by this work, redevelopment would need to take place in a series of phases that would allow residents to remain on site, but safely away from the work. This could require an ,VV„ G' hH �W II UM&I F'Id 11 :Kru Schematic Design Report 69 Terrace Lodge Proposed New 100 Bed Long -Term Care Home extended time period over several years to complete. At the County of Elgin Council's direction, this report explores the latter (b option) in a one - storey solution. At the outset of the design study, the Terrace Lodge Design Team wished to explore the most cost effective solution to the home's design. A part of this search was to consider three, rather than four Resident Home Areas (RHAs), to minimize RHA support services. However, due to the restriction by the MOHLTC that requires a maximum of 32 beds per RHA, the most beds the home could contain would be 96. Not wishing to reduce beds in the home, and the County, a four RHA design solution was pursued. From a siting perspective it was clear that the design needed to respect the existing long -term care (LTC) building and not require any demolition of it prior to the completion of the new home. This approach would allow all residents and building amenities to remain on -site during the redevelopment. Also, the new building was to be positioned in such a way that a potential walkway link could join it to the existing building in a public area. All site servicing was to be brought in from the roadway, without reliance on existing services already on site. There was also to be consideration for the possible severance of the new building site from the existing. This led to a minimum distance requirement between the two buildings based on zoning setbacks. The resulting solution optimizes the available land in the south -east corner of the site by sharing the main entrance area with the existing building and locating service access to the north. By locating all common areas to the south and service areas to the north, on the west side of the building, the private RHA (bedroom areas) fan out on the available property to occupy the east side of the site and take advantage of private, well lit courtyard spaces. The construction of the new 85,111 square foot brick clad building consists of typical wood frame residential construction in the bedroom areas and steel beams and columns in larger open common spaces. Bearing walls are used in some service areas, as well. Special wood trusses accentuate the ceiling in the Great Room and Chapel. Mechanical services are provided by a combination of roof -top and basement located equipment. An emergency generator is provided that will serve the entire building in power outage conditions. Based on the Class `C' Cost Estimate, the construction -only cost of the presented design solution is approximately $25,905,000. However, this does not include any project related soft costs such as; 1. Furnishings, Fittings and Equipment, 2. Audio Visual Equipment, 3. Site Plan Review Costs, 4. Building Permit Fees, IARcHrrEcrs 70 Schematic Design Report Terrace Lodge Proposed New 100 Bed Long -Term Care Home 5. Municipal Services Connections, 6. Consultant Fees, 7. Staff Training 8. Moving Costs, 9. Project Contingencies. The total Project Cost, including items 1 to 8 above, is approximately $29,681,000. 2.0 BACKGROUND Terrace Lodge, located at 49462 Talbot Line in Malahide Township, was established as a Residential Care Facility in 1977. Over the years resident care, program and service requirements changed and Terrace Lodge was re- classified as a Long Term Care Home. Terrace Lodge is a one hundred (100) bed home consisting of twenty (20) private rooms and forty (40) semi - private rooms. Four (4) private rooms have their own ensuite washroom. The remaining sixteen (16) private rooms are a one bed bedroom accommodating one resident, another one bed bedroom accommodating one resident with each bedroom having direct access into a shared ensuite washroom. The remaining forty (40) semi private rooms are two -bed bedroom accommodating two residents with each bedroom having direct access into a shared ensuite washroom. In February of 2014, MMMC Architects was awarded the project of redeveloping portions of the existing 100 bed Terrace Lodge Long -Term Care Home to bring it closer to the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long -Term Care 2009 Design Guidelines. This redevelopment involved renovations to the existing building that were outlined in the original RFP document. The original RFP Terms of Reference read as follows; Terrace Lodge Long Term Care Home is a not-for-profit long -term care home. The building is centrally located on an eighteen acre site that is bordered by Talbot Line to the west, residential homes to the south, farmland to the east, and Catfish Creek Conservation Area to the north. Terrace Lodge home offers 3 different types of long- term care rooms, private (1 bed with 1 washroom), semi private (2 beds sharing 1 washroom), and basic (4 beds sharing 1 washroom) which cater to approximately 100 residents. The population of residents is approximately 100 people including 1 wing that can accommodate 25 Alzheimer's dementia secured residents. Terrace Lodge staff compliment is approximately 120 people with a possible 60 staff present during change over periods. The Adult Day Program staff and clients total an additional 8 -10 People. Therefore, the total average occupant load on a given day for the home is approximate 130 people. 71 Schematic Design Report Terrace Lodge Proposed New 100 Bed Long -Term Care Home Terrace Lodge was constructed approximately 35 years ago (1976/1977), and at the time of its construction it was considered an excellent seniors home. Terrace Lodge has continued to provide a high level of care for generations of seniors, but as times have changed new requirements for Long Term Care Homes have been brought forward by the Ministry of Health and Long Term Care centers. Under these new standards Terrace Lodge is currently considered as a class "C" home. Proponents will explore options which could change the classification of the Terrace Lodge to a Class "A" home. It is important to note that the homes classification relates to the buildings physical and environmental settings and does not relate to the quality of care being delivered. The creation of this class system has been a response to the growing needs of seniors with dementia and other disabilities that have limited their independence. This is done so the building layouts can adapt to provide enhanced care, programs, and services in the most efficient and cost effective manner. The development of a site master plan strategy is imperative to help guide new design planning options into the future. Simply put, the geographic County that Terrace Lodge will serve in the next 50 -100 years should be considered in any renovation such that the demographic profile of the seniors in this specific community are managed in a positive way into this renovated building. Over the past 10 years, two of the Long Term Care Homes operated by the County of Elgin have been re -built and upgraded to bring them into line with current standards set by the Province. As a result of this upgrading program, it is now possible to provide better, more appropriate care and services for all residents, and in particular for those who have special needs and require complex care. Architectural and Engineering upgrades have created buildings that are more efficient to operate, more economic to maintain, and that are safer, more enjoyable places for staff to work. Terrace Lodge has not yet been part of this upgrading process. The intent of this proposal is to bring Terrace Lodge, in terms of architectural and structural re- configuration, in line with current building codes and design guidelines established by the Ministry of Health and Long Term Care so that Elgin County will be able to provide a safe, healthy and environmentally friendly facility for residents and staff. The following are items from a service and operational prospective that should be improved: a) Relocate nurses stations to wings /renovate kitchenette areas and old tub room on each of the three wings; b) Build addition to lower north dining room and plan to build a second floor (upper north) mirror image of the lower floor addition; c) Add second elevator; 72 Schematic Design Report Terrace Lodge Proposed New 100 Bed Long -Term Care Home d) Renovate main floor washrooms /two areas; e) Renovate /relocate tuck shop; f) Renovate /relocate hair salon; g) Addition to kitchen to change /increase storage, walk -in cooler /freezer /dry storage, add washroom and locate MSS office to same area; h) Enclose upper floor mezzanine; i) Replace all windows; j) Add Loading Dock; k) Enclose all Decks /Balconies; 1) Replace Nurse Call System / Telephone System; m) Add Heater /Air Conditioning unit to resident rooms; n) Replace /relocate existing electrical substation and power supply. As per the RFP requirements, MMMC Architects retained the following sub - consultants for the project; • Mechanical consulting services • Electrical consulting services • Structural consulting services • Civil consulting services (site servicing) • Landscape architect consulting services MMMC Architects met with the Terrace Lodge Design Committee from March to May, 2014. Based on re- development options and preliminary order -of- magnitude costing, a final design was documented and presented to Council on June 10th. Subsequent to Council review, a public meeting was held on August 19th, 2014 to present the design ideas to residents, staff and family members. At this meeting, it became quite clear to all in attendance that a renovation solution to Terrace Lodge's deficiencies was not favoured. The majority of those in attendance wished to see a study completed for a new building option. The Terrace Lodge Building Committee went to Council on September 9th seeking approval to commission a study for a new 100 bed building, located on the same parcel of land as the existing home. Approval was granted and MMMC was requested to submit a fee proposal based on the following list of criteria; The approved recommendation is as follows: 1) MMMC Architects be directed to design a new Terrace Lodge long -term care facility on land adjacent to the existing home to a Class "A" ministry standard; and, ARcHmrirs 73 Schematic Design Report Terrace Lodge Proposed New 100 Bed Long -Term Care Home 2) New and updated cost estimates be determined by the architects based on the new facility design; and, 3) When these estimates are available, that Elgin County Council develop a strategy to lobby the provincial government for adequate partnership funding for the full rebuild; and, 4) That staff be directed to present the budget implications of this new rebuild to the incoming Council for its consideration in 2015 Staff met on September 12th and developed the following criteria for the new design: 1) Provide a Class D cost estimate for a new Class A facility 2) Number of beds to remain at 100 (20 private, 40 basic, 40 semi- private) 3) New home to be 1 storey design (not LEED certified) 4) Include palliative care and private family room 5) Option to include a potential link to the existing home 6) Ensure that comments from the open house are taken into consideration when developing estimate (refer to attached documents) 7) Provide an estimated value of the current Terrace Lodge building Our goals for this project are: a) To align the new facility with the most recent standards to provide enhanced care for residents and improve operational efficiencies b) To have a responsible balance between cost and benefit c) Minimize impact on residents and staff We would request that the design report be completed by November 21 so that staff can review the report and develop a plan to finance the project. The final plan will then be presented to Council in early January. A representative of MMMC will be required to attend a management meeting and a County Council meeting to present the plan with County staff. The following report addresses these recommendations, criteria and goals. Further discussion on the costing of the design resulted in an agreement to provide a Class `C' estimate, in lieu of a Class D', to achieve more accuracy. The definition of a Class `C' Estimate from the "Guide to Cost Predictability in Construction: An Analysis of Issues Affecting the Accuracy of Construction Estimates ", prepared by the Joint Federal Government / Industry Cost Predictability Taskforce is; " rK 1,1 ∎11 ��W II UM&I F'1111 Aran Schematic Design Report 74 Terrace Lodge Proposed New 100 Bed Long -Term Care Home "Class C Estimate This is a schematic design (construction documents) development estimate, where the program is set; the consultants have provided plans, elevations, sections, and an approximate palette of materials, as well as a concept design to allow form and spaces, and the design is generally completed up to 33 %. The cost consultant can now measure drawings more accurately for an elemental estimate which can provide a framework to modify or refine parts of the design. There may be as many as three or more concept designs that require comparative costing. From the documentation and information provided, where possible quantities of all major elements are assessed and measured and priced at rates considered competitive for the particular project under stipulated lump sum form of contract. The estimate is a determination of the fair market value for the construction of the project, not a prediction of the low bid. Owners and project managers need to carefully read the exclusions and inclusions list, as well as the cost considerations of the cost estimate. These should be reviewed with the cost consultant along with the remainder of the cost report" 3.0 PROGRAMME At weekly meetings from September 24th to November 19th, 2014, programmatic spaces were determined and simultaneously planned in an attempt to speed the design process. During this accelerated exercise functional, spatial and location characteristics of each room were reviewed, evaluated and approved. The resulting space table and floor plans are a product of this fluid collaboration between the Terrace Lodge Design Team and MMMC Architects. The general space requirements for the new 100 bed long -term care home are based on the need to replace the existing home while meeting the 2009 MOHLTC Design Guidelines and Council's recommendations. However, there is also a desire to maintain the culture of the existing home by providing community spaces that exceed the Design Guidelines, but provide spaces that residents in the home and community have come to expect of Terrace Lodge, and the other homes operated by Elgin County. Community spaces that were determined to be of greatest importance to Terrace Lodge are; Great Room: A welcoming main hall with fireplace and lounge type seating for social gathering Library: A quiet place to read and access the internet The Lunch Counter & Seating: A social space to meet and eat ARcHnurs 75 Schematic Design Report Terrace Lodge Proposed New 100 Bed Long -Term Care Home Exercise Room: A healthy place to keep fit Garden Room: A sunny place to bring the outdoors in and enjoy pleasant activities with friends Celebration Room: A comfortable place to celebrate milestones with family and friends General Store: A convenient place to buy some things and carry on a tradition It was also determined that the Adult Day Services Program needed to come to the new home so that those needs of the community outside the home could continue to be met. By locating the Exercise Room between the ADS and the LTC home, that function can be easily shared between them. However, the pool was seen as a space that, due to high costs of construction, should remain in the existing building and, potentially, be accessible through the optional link. Refer to Appendix A for the Final Space Table. 4.0 CODES AND STANDARDS The new Terrace Lodge will need to conform to the latest version of all applicable codes, standards and by -laws that will be in place at the time of building permit application. Two of these documents; the Ontario Building Code and the MOHLTC Long -Term Care Design Guidelines are currently in a state of transition. The latest version of the Ontario Building Code, 2012, has revisions which came into effect on January 1st, 2015. These are concerned mostly with barrier -free design requirements. The MOHLTC are currently updating Design Guidelines for the next phase of the B &C Bed Redevelopment Program. The date for the release of the MOHLTC Design Guidelines updates is not yet known. However, it has been reported that no revisions will be made to design requirements for completely new facilities. 4.1 Ontario Building Code The proposed one storey long term care facility is classified as a Group B, Division 2 building. This classification covers Care and Treatment Facilities and includes Long - Term Care Homes, Hospitals, Infirmaries, Psychiatric hospitals and other forms of institutions that house occupants on a 24 hour per day basis for care and treatment. The building falls under OBC Article 3.2.2.40. Group B, Division 2 or Division 3, up to 2 Storeys, Sprinklered. As such, the building floor areas are required to be divided by firewalls so that no floor area between exterior walls and firewalls shall exceed 2,400 76 Schematic Design Report Terrace Lodge Proposed New 100 Bed Long -Term Care Home m2. The proposed building may be constructed of combustible or non - combustible materials. In addition, any floor assemblies between different levels are required to be constructed as fire separations with a minimum fire resistance rating of 45 minutes. Any load bearing walls, columns or arches supporting such floors shall have a fire resistance rating not less than 45 minutes, as well. A two stage fire alarm system is required throughout the entire building 4.2 Ministry of Health & Long -Term Care 2009 Design Guidelines Introduced in 1998 and upgraded in 2009, the Long -Term Care Design Standards must be adhered to for all new and redeveloped homes in Ontario. The Design Manual's goal is to integrate design concepts that will: • Facilitate the provision of quality resident care in an environment that is comfortable, aesthetically pleasing and as "home -like" as possible. • Support well- coordinated, interdisciplinary care for residents who have diverse care requirements. The new Terrace Lodge home will be required to meet the full Design Standards found in the 2009 MOHLTC Long -Term Care Home Design Manual and any amendments that may be made prior to development. 4.3 Zoning by -Laws Terrace Lodge is located in the Township of Malahide within the County of Elgin. While technically located in a suburban district known as `Dingle Street', just outside the Town of Aylmer, Terrace Lodge is typically associated with the town. The land on which the Lodge is located is zoned `I', Institutional. Nursing Home and Rest Home are permitted uses. The site is subject to the following zone regulations; Minimum Lot Area: 1850.0 m2 Minimum Lot Frontage: 30.0 m Maximum Lot Coverage 40% Maximum Building Height: 12.0 m Front Yard Depth: 6.0 m ARcHnurs 77 Schematic Design Report Terrace Lodge Proposed New 100 Bed Long -Term Care Home Side Yard Width (interior): Side Yard Width (Exterior): Rear Yard Depth: 2.0 m 6.0 m 7.5 m It is also important to note that the northern property line of the site is subject to a 15 meter setback imposed by the Catfish Creek Conservation Authority due to the adjacent ravine being an environmentally sensitive area. While the 15m setback does not permit the construction of buildings within that distance, hard surfaces such as roadways are permitted to be constructed to within 6m of that property line. Aerial View of the Existing Terrace Lodge LTC Home _ uuun n nni 1 ECTS 78 Schematic Design Report Terrace Lodge Proposed New 100 Bed Long -Term Care Home 5.0 DESIGN STUDIES AND OPTIONS During the period from September 24th to November 19th, 2014, when weekly meetings were determining the programmatic requirements for the new home, design studies of options for the new building were also being tested and reviewed. At the very first meeting on September 24th, an initial design concept for the new building was arrived at based on discussions between the Design Team and MMMC Architects. This concept sketch, considering a solution with three home areas of 32 beds each, formed the basis for the design options which followed. Initial Design Sketch of Site Planning Concept, September 24th, 2014 The initial concept was formed around the idea of having the central core of the building located close to the existing home for connection reasons, The resident home areas (RHAs) were envisioned as radiating around this core, allowing easy access for both visitors, from the main entry, and staff, from the service core, to each RHA. The flexibility of the design concept allows the positioning of the individual building components in such a way that the boundaries of the site can be respected and maintained. In the following weeks, the Design Team reviewed three possible design solutions based on this initial concept sketch. "rK V' hH��WII IN 11 Kru Schematic Design Report 79 79 Terrace Lodge Proposed New 100 Bed Long -Term Care Home 6.0 SELECTED DESIGN At the meeting on October 8th, the decision was made to go with a four 25 -bed RHA design, totaling 100 beds as per the original Council direction. The final design, Option 3, was seen as the most effective of the three options presented to achieve this goal. Structural, mechanical and electrical consultants were invited to the next meeting to discuss system concepts for the design. MMMC prepared the following plan for that meeting; GROUND H OOR m\ttiLlim,*,A244 MAIN FLOOR Option 3, Four 25 -Bed RHA Floor Plans — Ground and First Floors V if r lll�I� j111! f l I1Ilhdllill iii1A1iirliJlIJJ1� liil�lC , y, �J,�Jp1 �pIgl�� 1;f JJJJ rr���j�j�p� ��� I�f iif �' I'I�'DY�/A�lr'''H'„fNr UJ�� iii „', ; 1�i111fiiff�k�Kr�,u „�, r!mYl�ttl(�lilll ,'NU� • 111II14 , °'ifilfl'1���iiiii111111?I 1 11111 loll 11111111111111111111111111 111110 Option 3, Four 25 -Bed RHA Floor Plans — View from South 1HV` ITS 80 Schematic Design Report Terrace Lodge Proposed New 100 Bed Long -Term Care Home Based on comments from the Design Team, the plan was further refined for the October 22nd meeting. Major updates included relocating the basement to be more central to the overall plan. This was considered better for mechanical & electrical distribution. Consideration was given to the distribution of spaces in the service core and adding more detail to the RHA common spaces. A major development was the refinement of the RHA bedroom areas. The core RHA service areas were detailed and excess space was removed from the circulation corridors. GROUND FLOOR MAIN FLOOR Option 3 Refined Overall Floor Plans GARDEN SECURE RHA GARDEN Ali 014%0111k 04' ED RH ��i1�1�EUlst� SECURE COMMUNITY Option 3 Refined RHA Floor Plan ARCHMECTS 81 Schematic Design Report Terrace Lodge Proposed New 100 Bed Long -Term Care Home Refinements to the design continued through the months of October and November culminating in a final schematic design in late November. The plan below illustrates the final Schematic Design planning that was issued to the Quantity Surveyor for the preparation of the Class `C' Estimate.. GROUND FLOOR 6.1 ARCHITECTURE MAIN FLOOR For a complete set of the selected design final architectural schematic drawings and images refer to Appendix `B'. 6.2 Structure The structural system for the proposed Terrace Lodge new building is a combination of wood frame bearing walls and trusses with steel columns and beams. Precast concrete floor and roof planks also form part of the system in the core areas. For the complete Structural System Design Brief including preliminary layouts, refer to Appendix `C'. 6.3 Mechanical & Electrical The mechanical systems for the proposed Terrace Lodge new building include automatic sprinklers, a 2 stage fire alarm system, and two options for the HVAC system. 82 Schematic Design Report Terrace Lodge Proposed New 100 Bed Long -Term Care Home The electrical systems include emergency power for the entire building, and energy efficiency measures. For the complete Mechanical & Electrical Systems Design Brief, refer to Appendix `D'. 6.4 Civil The Functional Plan for the proposed Terrace Lodge new building provides a comprehensive study of the servicing and design for the site. The complete Functional Plan report is located in Appendix `E'. 6.3 Food Service The layout of the main kitchen has been superimposed on the architectural floor plans. However, for a complete set of the food service schematic drawings and schedules, including the main kitchen and RHA serving areas, refer to Appendix `F'. 7.0 SCHEDULE The following schedule roughly describes the period of time required to complete the design and construction of the proposed new Terrace Lodge LTC home. The schedule is based on receiving approval from Council on, or shortly after, the meeting on January 13th, 2015. ARcHrrEcrs 83 Schematic Design Report ta,t:fh r d ' to ot,' Terrace Lodge Proposed New 100 Bed Long -Term Care Home 8.0 CLASS `C' CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE Page 6 of the Class `C' Estimate, below, summarizes the estimated construction costs. For a more thorough summary of the Class `C' Estimate, refer to Appendix `G'. For a summary of total Construction and Project related costs, refer to Section 9.0 of the report. Project: 21084 Revision 1 Date. January 5, 2015 TERRACE LODGE LTC CLASS C ESTIMATE' EXECU'TIVE SUMMARY GFA (SF) $/SF Es' ated Cost A CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE 1 E3unld0ng arid Site Development Escalation to Jan 2016 - 3% Post Contract ( construction ) Contingency - 5 °r' $260 $22,113,000 INCLUDED 663;000 Subtotal A B Cash Altoa ances be onflrmedl Not Included pn A Above 1 Kitchen Equipment 2 Laundry Equipment Testing and Inspection.... 4 Nurse Call - Budget provided by Owner Phone, TV, CTV, wUOE'r, Door Controls - Budget 5 provided by Owner 6 ),Afanderguard - Budget provided by Owner 235 5,00901 51,000000 100,000 $100,000 1255,000 000 $10,000 Subtotal B Total Esti�. excluding OHST) 1,990 000 Collet 304 10',000 The link structure, connecting the proposed new building to the existing, has been priced separately and will be an additional $150,000 of base construction cost. To this must be added escalation of 3% and post contract contingencies of 5 %. The total construction cost for the link structure will be in the area of $165,000. 1HV` ITS 84 Schematic Design Report Terrace Lodge Proposed New 100 Bed Long -Term Care Home 9.0 TOTAL PROJECT COST A. if lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllli µ;�JJ Vii' "- '�))))'•1 Construction Costs (from estimate) 1 Building & Site Development 2 Design Estimating Contingency - 8% 3 Escalation to January 2016 - 3% 4 Post Contract /Bid (construction) Contingency - 5% Su bt al A B. Cash Allowances 1 Kitchen Equipment (from estimate) 2 Laundry Equipment (from estimate) 3 Testing & Inspection (from estimate) 4 Nurse Call (Owner Supplied Information) 5 Phone, TV, CTV, WiFi, Door Controls (Owner Supplied Information) 6 Wanderguard (Owner Supplied Information) Su bt al $22,113,000 included $663,000 $1,139,000 23,915,000 $1,000,000 $100,000 $100,000 $255,000 $525,000 $10,000 ,990,000 U)11!! 1 J J J1 Jl 11 !1!1 II 1D 1 II 1DD Jl ,i 1 ID 111 J D! 1 i»�ii� 1 i»�ii� i»� 1 �1� �� VII��� �� &11I ��1 �llllllllllll1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 � �� "2 C. Soft (Project) Costs 1 Furnishings, Fittings & Equipment @ $15,000 per bed la AV equipment (not included in above) (Owner Supplied Information) 2 Site Plan Review & Agreement (Owner Supplied Information) 4 Building Permit Review Fees (Owner Supplied Information) 5 Municipal Services Connection Agreement (Owner Supplied Info.) 6 Consultant Fees - 7% (placeholder for budget purposes only) 7 Staff Training 8 Moving Su btota l 111 D. Project Contingency (To Be Determined) 11� $1,500,000 $15,000 $2,200 $65,200 $20,000 $1,924,000 $200,000 $50,000 776,000 $0 AncHrrEcis 85 Schematic Design Report Terrace Lodge Proposed New 100 Bed Long -Term Care Home Appendix `A' Final Space Table 86 Schematic Design Report O a TERRACE LODGE 100 BEDS MMMC Inc. Architects Confidential 0 U) OJ 0 OJ N z ui o E °) m-° z o Pa LL LL F 4:k r 4:k O 1- New Construction 21 November, 2014 0 z 0 2 2 0 U r a .0 '00 co co a) d N O O O N 7 7 2 ce a 2 ce 0 LL O a) o `m ci- 0 i 2.1 Resident Bedrooms 0 0 0 CD M fD 0) a M CD- CO r r N N O O co O O v co O a co O c▪ o O O c▪ o T 0 LL 0 T 0 LL 0 T 0 LL 0 CO co a) E 0 Private Room Wardrobe 0 1- CO O co O 01 CD co CO O 01 CD co CO co T 0 LL 0 T 0 LL 0 T 0 LL 0 co co co N 0 N > E 00 c Standard Room Wa 0 1- 2.2 Resident Washrooms O CD O O 01 a O 01 a O a O a T 0 LL 0 T 0 LL 0 Private Ensuite Washroom Shared Ensuite Washroom 0 1- 2.3 Resident Bath Rooms & Shower Rooms CO CO CD a O it) it) 01 co 01 co x 0 x 0 x 0 x 0 Shower Area Washroom Shower/Washroom 0 1- 2015 -01 -05 a) o 0 0 N O N 7 7 a z 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 '0 a) m m a) m N TERRACE LODGE 100 BEDS MMMC Inc. Architects Confidential 2 ce a 2 ce 2 ce 0 0 0 N 7 7 O O O N 7 7 In o 0 O O lf) O O "6 a > E a co co O F CO 2 co co LL LL O Q CD 4_; i 3.1 Nursing & Program/Therapy Work Space Communication Centre r tD O a a Care Centre Conference Room E O O 0 N E U m 2 O O O O Health Clinic 0 3.2 RHA Storage Space for Resident Care CO O co M co M co M co M 2 E O ca E Q w E 0 a) J 0 J 0 0 0 c J 0 a) 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 i 8 —J Ci LY N a) Q Total Resident Lounge and Program /Activity Space per Resident O] CO r O] co N O co M a co co M a co co M a co N O] co co coo a) Q N r co N c 0 m` 0 0 O co co co O O co M M M M M M M M a) Q co co 0 2015 -01 -05 O N 7 7 a z 0 2 2 0 U TERRACE LODGE 100 BEDS MMMC Inc. Architects Confidential 2 ce a 2 ce 0 0 0 N 7 7 O O O N 7 7 ..n o 0 F CO a) a) a) a) z O O O O K1 N K1 N O F CO P `o co co LL LL Q Q LL i co_ 47 CES co 5.1 Resident Dining Areas co N O rn CO rn CO N CO 47 a) Q x Q c N U T E 11 5.2 Dietary Service Space 2243 2243 0 0 O O T UUUUUU to LL Q per Facility per Facility T to LL Q per Facility per Facility T to LL Q per Facility per Facility per Facility per Facility T to LL Q per Facility per Facility T to LL Q per Facility per Facility T to LL Q co N N Main Kitchen Receiving & Dry Storage Receiving /Decasing Area Dry Goods Storage Non -Food Storage Cold Storage Walk -in Refrigerator General Purpose Freezer Preparation, Production & Meal Assembly Ingredient Control Vegetable /Catering Preparation Area Meat Preparation Area Main Cooking & Baking Area Bulk Assembly Area Pot Washing Area Sanitation Dishroom Soiled Cart Parking Cart Wash Support & Storage Area Cart Marshalling Area Non -Food Storage (On -Hand Stock) 1 Janitor Room 1 u01 O 47 0 N Meals on Wheels E m 2015 -01 -05 00 o00 a z 0 2 2 0 U TERRACE LODGE 100 BEDS MMMC Inc. Architects Confidential a 2 ce a 2 ce a x x N 7 7 0 0 0 N 7 7 O O O N 7 7 a) d z u1 0 0 0 O O O u'1 N u'1 N K1 N N "6 c u a - M C 0 N 6 0_ (0 I-m 0 O_ Bins Drop -Off i cD No Interior Space Implications 6.2 Beauty Salon /Barber Shop M cD u1 M N 0 c1) 0 0 OJ 6.3 Place of Worship O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 T 0 0_ 0 T 0 0_ O O Q U 0 6.4 Enhanced Resident Space O O u) 1264 83 0 394 c0 O 1— N 200 183 646 24 546 0 52 120 c0 u) O N. 224 196 V) 1264 83 0 394 N 200 183 646 24 546 0 52 120 528 N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 132 28 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 132 28 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 132 28 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 132 28 0 T CZ LL Q per Facility per Facility per Facility per Facility per Facility per Facility per Facility per Facility per Facility per Facility per Facility per Facility per Facility per Facility T CZ LL a per Facility per Facility 0 N 7 M CO CO 0 7 CO c0 N O M O CO c0 7 ,r N c0 O c7 N O LC) N NCO CO Cr) N 7 `m J Great Room Chair Storage Servery Celebration Room Gardening Room Lunch Counter & General Store Lunch Counter General Store (Including Storage) Lunch Counter Seating Vending Machine Alcove Exercise Room (Shared with ADS) Therapy Room (see section 3.1) Gym Washroom Laundry Room Palliative (3) & Respite Care (1) Bedroom Areas Vestibule Washroom 2015 -01 -05 O N 7 7 a Z 0 2 2 0 U C 0 -0 co a) EL' a) a) N TERRACE LODGE 100 BEDS MMMC Inc. Architects Confidential 2 ce a 2 ce a x x 0 0 0 N 7 7 O O O N 7 7 In o 0 1-n O O lf) O O CD r O O o u7 N u7 N K1 N K1 N 171 .413) F w P `o LL LL co Q Q CD Ce 4_; O CD O CD O CD O CD T U LL 0 co w 7.1 Laundry Space CO CD N 007 007 CD CD co co O O co a0 co co O O co co o co co T U LL 0 T U LL 0 T U LL 0 co O O E O O 0 a) O) c (6 J a) O a) a) E O 0 a) c1) c m C O a) 7.2 Housekeeping Support Service Space co r co co a rn a rn rn a 07 a 07 a x 0 co E O T ra 0 a) ca) w c a) E c O w 7.3 Utility Space M M O 07 co co co co co co N CO co co N CO co co N CO x 0 x 0 co co E 0 c U E 0 0 m U 0 c J 0 7.4 Maintenance Service Support Space N- o co co 0) 07 co N- o 0 co N N N N N N N N T U LL 0 x 0 O O L a) a) m N U 0 c O E E U i N co 0 0 10.1 Storage Space (Baseme co co T U LL 0 T U LL 0 co 2015 -01 -05 Q) 000 a z 0 2 2 0 U TERRACE LODGE 100 BEDS MMMC Inc. Architects Confidential 2 ce a 2 ce a x x 0 0 0 N 7 7 O O O N 7 7 Ln o 0 LC) o 0 "6 u a i � E - [6 0 a co co T F w a) 3 d z C) en r f� O O O K1 N K1 N To w F w P `• o co co LL LL co Q 73 Q N • LL co- O 0 co O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O T U LL Q T U LL Q T U LL Q T U LL Q N co 0 1- 10.2 Non - Resident Space "' N cD N N 355 80 30 140 326 70 O O N- r 58 140 123 126 30 84 140 23 500 124 u7 f■ N 2261 355 80 30 140 326 70 O O 58 140 123 126 30 84 140 23 500 124 27151 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O T U M LL Q per Facility per Facility per Facility per Facility per Facility per Facility per Facility per Facility per facility per facility per facility per Facility per Facility per Facility per Facility per Facility per Facility per Facility cD N U O CO CO O O CO 7 cD O M N- O O r r CO O u, 7 CO cD N N C) ,r M CO O co 7 N 0 7 O N Office, Director Private Dining / Boardroom Sidebar Servery Coat Closet Office, Resident Care Coordinator Business Office Workstation, Administrative Assistant Workstation, Administrative Assistant Workstation, Administrative Assistant Waiting Area Meeting Room General Office Files (Active) Staff Washroom Meeting / Lunch Room Workroom Coat Closet Remote File Storage (basement) Server Room & Workstation (basement) 0 1- (1) O O a M 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O T U LL Q T U LL Q T U LL Q O U 0 0 U O O U U 0 12 O U U 0 0 1- N 7 N 47 v 0 O 0 O O O O O T U LL Q T U LL Q T U LL Q N 7 0 C O T Q E w 0 1- 2015 -01 -05 Q) No 0 0 00 co O O N N MI N 7 '71- r N N a z 0 2 2 0 U TERRACE LODGE 100 BEDS MMMC Inc. Architects Confidential 2 ce N x x x x 0 0 0 N 7 O O O N 7 In o 0 U) O 0 O co co F w LL LL Q co Q CD LL CO O co N CO 0 co O O O O 0 O Food & Nutritional Services W N 0 N O O O O N 0 U a) 0 O 0 Q O c 2 0 0 O N 0 M W r r r N 01 r Maintenance Services O N O O O O Office, Maintenance 0 O O O Cold Room Staff Services CO co co co O M N CO co co O M N O O O O T U LL 0 T U LL 0 T U LL 0 T U LL 0 T U LL 0 CO co co O Male Lockers/WR Female Lockers/WR Staff Room X m c E O -c 0] C c W 0 O 10.3 Receiving /Service Space co O co W co co o O O O O T U LL 0 T U LL 0 co O Cart Wash & Steamer 0 O 10.4 Reception /Entrance Space r r r r r N. r r O O O O T U LL 0 r N. 0 U_ 0 N c C .� O .c N C 0 O 0 U O c LL 0 O 10.5 Way- Finding No space implications 10.6 Elevators 1441 - 141029 - Space Table Draft - 100 Beds.xls 2015 -01 -05 O o00 N N 7 7 a z 0 2 2 0 U TERRACE LODGE 100 BEDS MMMC Inc. Architects Confidential 2 ce N x x x x 0 0 0 N 7 7 O O O N 7 7 In o 0 u7 O 0 O a N - �m co co LL LL Q Cr CD LL a T U LL 0 Elevator Machine Room 10.7 Public Washrooms M CO rn M CO M T U m LL 0 M CO M Men's Washroom Women's Washroom 10.8 Corridors ea included in gross up fac U -- J Z 11.1 Adult Day Services 0) 0) r rn 0) r O O O O T U m LL 0 Main ADS Suite ADS Vestibule U F J L 3 c E 0 m O X W E N 0 N M r M O M 0) r ▪ O • r r 47 CO- r CO N01N M M M r O 0) r ▪ O • r r 47 0 O co m d a �a d O w 0 LL To LL ✓ O r N C z p z V F � F Square Feet per Resident Grossing Factor co Gross Floor Area 1441 - 141029 - Space Table Draft - 100 Beds.xls 2015 -01 -05 000 N \ 7 a TERRACE LODGE 100 BEDS MMMC Inc. Architects Confidential 2 ce N x x a x x 0 0 0 N 7 7 N F CO O O O� N OO W a) a) z LC) 0 0 u7 O 0 F w co co LL LL Q Q CD 4_; Square Feet per Resident 1441 - 141029 - Space Table Draft - 100 Beds.xls 2015 -01 -05 Terrace Lodge Proposed New 100 Bed Long -Term Care Home Appendix `B' Architectural Schematic Design Documents ARcHmrirs 96 Schematic Design Report sl -+Y -Y ‘y yn �. .Y. 4. • �4 • �fi , � s � 16''''.1,,,,‘,..,_,,,,,, -1---''',`' g, � • • • • 1 1 • • • 0 • E ®GO GO • ./ I 0 PA®� BOB ®B 1 • 1 • 1 , it t»: j • • . 2.1.11ffil , 0110 • 1 \ '10' .. 1 PLAN • MMMC ARCHITECTS SITE PLAN TERRACE LODGE PROPOSED NEW BUILDING 1500 ®I\ AYLMER , ONTARIO SD.3.1 v. .,0,56,.„.0774.62 s� ®,�6� 2014 -12 -22 N- o) A si-Y a , • • -- -.le 4 ,. HI 1 1 ..___ I'lliA.--,Pf '' ,'-'-'.. r-- ''. s, y : 1 • I l I - �• p � f . i. � 7 te*'" t � - 7 t _ : ,--- - \ ".-' -- 44 " , - _,,i 4 _ 0 it, „, ,,, r r „, ii, ! _ .- ,.- - :V. r6 • lik ift— ' - --, --1 : ,\ y` O - - - - = `fix. J / -� �, - .. .t^ - - - "4 ,bs.,-...... ° ; '66;`x'., 4- il ,44, 0 40. . • .- . - , - ---- ,,,.,fa • A.„•,.„4,i,,,,, .„ Jib.* ,', 1).,4 , A 0 ,sk ot 1 1t _,_ ADAIN 0i MMMC ARCHITECTS CONTEXT WITH EXISTING TERRACE LODGE PROPOSED NEW BUILDING 1:500,1:49.5 ter, m, .a�.. AYLMER, ONTARIO SD.3.2 s "'-"" - '-- -�` 2014 -12 -22 j I qv l 1 ( . s -- MOW' III I I. PARKING II 1 41/ I I� I� ARD: � ler �AFF P,; mw AREA II II� — •x * ". • • ccyy I�e K CURE v+ f / i b�. ARD NCE lift EIi1_,______. o ii441141'1 _ ppN EXISTI E OOR �� \ \- N ., �. ® , ENTRAN AREA 'i s-_- -'j N 5 ::-:=1t-------- =A- s ' \ „1 :\ ; a l I \ I R p SECURE _ l� M IN I COMMUNITY ENT C� GARDEN ( \ COMMUNITY i A r 444 \ GARDEN \ %r ADP GARa -0- ...., I, . - 4 v* \ IS 1RERHA 4. iv. ir •URE' • ■ a_ ,464m olz, A a • pi to, `7:02 4 .7„: 4 ":41\7776, ,h,:t. p. m kw:,;:o,„ I I i ii4::31 .4,4 :41 \ ADP P,4RKN f GBf3D: ■ �w� -SIV ,.,,,r aru_vun,..,LL„ avu, I .w,v..`uv.auw. -SiltaamAIK A6 ' (w, GROUND FLOOR MAIN FLOOR SCALE 1 300 PAN SCALE 1300 • MMMC ARCHITECTS FLOOR PLANS TERRACE LODGE PROPOSED , NEW BUILDING 300 ®I\ AYLMER ONTARIO SD.3.3 v. 2014 -12 -22 /44 /177 ',it*. L t *** -4 -4� Common View Above No Roof ROOF /SECOND FLOOR PLAN 41 14,44110,1,4„:4, 0.40 Al■ /4\iA4 MMMCARCHITECTS ROOF PLAN TERRACE LODGE PROPOSED NEW BUILDING 3 ° °..$4,.3 ®I� tea, m,a AYLMER, ONTARIO 5D.3.4 s >,. �, „e Q s� ®,�6� 2014-12-22 k,1A, 114, '4111/111Z44,„ 111111111111111 yoloonoll11111oly ,011111111111111111111111111j11V,V1111 11* 4.„6,1004,46,„ MAD �u • eleA II I I 1 r ll { 1 I {■°1• I ii 11 { ________„__ 7 ft A: 28 sq ft I WO x A: 28 sq ft A: 28 sq ft A: 49�Sq ft ' : 49 sq ft A: 58 sq ft ' 1 A: 82 q ft \ 1 _ 4 el ��i `' - „„„_/„.„, ,„ 1 _ , L „ / U III I( \\ �� , •A 0 - 0 i i J 132 s ft A' \132 sq �e Ili A; 132 �I1 �. A: 13sq ft 132 s� �� j 132 sq% i SEMI- SEMI- PRIVATE STANDARD STANDARD PRIVATE PRIVATE (BASIC) (BASIC) MMMCARCHITECTS TYPICAL BEDROOM LAYOUTS TERRACE LODGE PROPOSED NEW BUILDING 125 tea, m,a ° AYLMER, ONTARIO SD.3.6 s».wsv„m°s.w¢ =22,', ,— -- 2014 -12 -22 1.1-.2=2=11 41_ 1111011 0001130,001,0011011011,11A 1111, 111111'1 10111111 ,1 1,1011111 p0P111, J s TE •� TOTAL FLOOR AREA III' ■ ` Ly LI • LA IP COMMUNITY J _ GARDEN CELEBRATION �u1 I� • �� � I LUNCH COUNTCC�R � � � • . � �� = 1ENERAL STORE L�. ■ O \ �QQ * -_ EI LL GARDENING • �L !Q,�', PQ;QA SEATING :44 - c f OUTDOOR 444'•' `�'► .. THE P� t. EATING AREA . * •.... / �� Q� ,EXERCISE 11 ... :1=1: lir 1 s.s.\ r [1I1 lull Gi.€'RORM ii ® �1 III ® ®® STOR I ADP CARD III! -: = ° ei VEST LIBRARY WAITING LOUNf.E ' 4 . -E OPTIONAL LINK 1 8 O -- I i I �A � --\°111‘1M ._ - -. -+. VEST u d � - y,' EXISTIN MAIN ADP ADP F ENTRANCE ENTRANCE ENTRA OM _..........iiiiii _riost Ibli _, ret, $1:4 *.:\ * iiiii Ille-i1 F --- - ----- - - - - -- PLAN • MMMCARCHITECTS CORE COMMON AREAS TERRACE LODGE PROPOSED NEW BUILDING 1100 , NORTH tea m,N •h ''' AYLMER, ONTARIO SD•3.9 vir 5197..6.118777.66¢ 519575222718777.6.2 2014 -12 -22 pm" °frit) M I MI 11=1 Ui z 0 2 2 0 C.) Ui 0 C.) z 0 Ui Ui H s 0 z 0 TION AT CORE AREAS UJ 11.1 CO 11.1 0 0 w5 D3 a w cn 0 (3_ 0 (3_ w 0 a 0 w 0 w 1— . 0 z 0 - < ce co a AYLMER, ONTARIO ta a, PIN aa Ui Ui Ui co Ui 0 z 0 H s 0 Ui Ui Ui co Ui 0 z 0 F- Ui Ui 0 z Sas .4,14011,C I Ui Ui 5 Ui co Ui 0 z 0 F- Ui Ui co - < 111 S 0 a w5 D3 a w cn 0 (3_ 0 (3_ w 0 a 0 w 0 w 1- . 0 z 0 - < ce co < AYLMER, ONTARIO F- - i•i 1.11 i•i —I DINING ROOM ELEVATION AT NORTH RHA L SOUTH ELEVATION AT NORTH RHA • 0 z_ a J_ 5 m w z a w V) 0 d 0 d w 0 a 0 J 0 w I- BUILDING ELEVATIONS - RHA N RI C6. AYLMER, ONTARIO 00 0 �� -�- �� x �w.�maE a.au- s ,e N� k \"' - an, m v v O CANOPY /GREAT ROOM SECTION - /N, - ---',\ ,',:-\-'=: - 1 -'----=',' a 2 0 Common View Above No Roof _ s _ ,V: I- - ROOF I - - wwmxs 71 J l LI � - _ — — aaamox �... `1 - *2.845 --� SECOND III — T z� o MAIN FLc GREAT ROOM /CHAPEL SECTION 4.MMMCARCHITECTS BUILDING SECTIONS - GREAT TERRACE LODGE PROPOSED NEW BUILDING 5 ° °,,:5° ROOM AYLMER, ONTARIO SD.3.13 s»..,.,,,,Bn��.Q s�s-„®,.,.6- 2014-12-22 1 c 9 OSERVICE CORE SECTION SCALE 150 • MMMCARCHITECTS BUILDING SECTIONS — CORE TERRACE LODGE PROPOSED NEW BUILDING 150 AREA tea, em,.... AYLMER, ONTARIO SD.3.14 s»..,.,,,,,,,..Q s�,�,�,4b� 2014 -12 -22 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111 AYLMER, ONTARIO GREAT ROOM FROM CHAPEL rfr eE,EEEEE,,,EVEEEV,E=E,E= ZELEEE!,,,, ; • , ;E__;;•4,9 00010 F 4.1011011.- 11111111110,741 111111111 1'111E1E1E1, E 0 z z5 D3 a w cn 0 (3_ 0 (3_ w 0 a 0 w 0 w I- VIEW OF RHA DINING ROOM AYLMER, ONTARIO 1111 I I I ! IIIIIIJh • Proposed Standard Bedroom View Existing 2 bed Room a 5 LLI z a LLI Cn 0 0 LLI 0 LLI w I- Ui p LU 0 (/) 00 0 L1J CO 0- 0 (.7 < Z 0 - Z < Ci) LU AYLMER, ONTARIO Terrace Lodge Proposed New 100 Bed Long -Term Care Home Appendix `C' Structural System Brief Documents 116 Schematic Design Report TAG ENGINEERS STRUCTURAL SYSTEM BRIEF Date: November 20, 2014 Project: Terrace Lodge Client: MMMC Architects Dist.: Dwight Lander No. of Pages: 6 Project No.: TE- 25106 -14 MMMC Architects dwight.lander@ mmc on.ca A. Scope Tacoma Engineers has been retained by MMMC Architects to complete the structural schematic design for a proposed new single storey 100 bed long -term care building in Aylmer, Ontario. The proposed building has an approximate total floor area of 80,000 ft2, including a 6,000 ft2 basement. This structural system report is intended to be used as part of a schematic design package for a Class `C' Estimate. B. Design Parameters The following design parameters are to be used for this project: ➢ Floor to floor heights: • Basement: 3,600 mm • Ground Floor 3,600 mm (to be confirmed with architect) ➢ Method of construction: • Conventional wood trusses and TJI rafters, wood stud bearing walls and interior steel beam bearing lines. • Hollowcore precast floors over the basement area. • Poured in place concrete foundation walls and strip footings. ➢ Building Code: 2012 Ontario Building Code ➢ Importance Category: High C. Design Loads, as per the 2012 Ontario Building Code ➢ Environmental (St. Thomas, Ontario) • Ss= 1.4kPa • Sr= 0.4kPa • q 1/50 = 0.47 kPa • Sa(0.2) =0.16 • Sa (0.5) = 0.096 • Sa (1.0) = 0.056 • Sa(2.0) =0.017 • PGA = 0.088 ➢ Seismic Considerations • Low Seismic Zone (assumed Site Class `D', see section E) • IEFaSa(0.2) = 1.3 x 1.3 x 0.16 = 0.27 176 Speedvale Avenue West Guelph, Ontario Canada N1H 1C3 Prof sionaB Engineer. On. Mar l° 117 TEL: 519 763 -2000 x227 FAx: 519 824 -2000 seanh@tacomaengineers.com Tacoma Engineers Inc. Project No. TE- 25106 -14 Page 2 of 5 November 20, 2014 MMMC Architects Terrace Lodge, Aylmer ➢ Ground Floor • Live Load: 1.9 kPa for residential and 4.8 kPa for other areas. Roof: • :• • :• Snow Load = 1.52 kPa + shadows & accumulations Superimposed Dead Loads: • Roofing: 0.75 kPa • Suspended: 0.3 kPa • Mechanical Roof Top Units, Etc. D. Materials: ➢ Precast concrete hollowcore: Standard strengths and materials ➢ Concrete for Foundations: • Footings: • Class N: ••• Exterior Walls: • Class F -2: • Interior Slabs: • Class N: ••• Exterior, Exposed • Class C -1: ➢ Steel: 20 MPa 25 MPa + 0.55 w/c ratio + 5% to 8% air entrainment 25 MPa Concrete Flatwork: 35 MPa + 0.40 w/c ratio + 5% to 8% air entrainment ••• Rebar: • • 400 MPa deformed, non - weldable ••• Structural Steel: • CAN3 G40.21M grade 350W for all wide flange and HSS • CAN3 G40.21M grade 300W for other steel • Exposed to weather to be treated based on architectural specifications (minimum hot dip galvanized) E. Components: See Attached for a Proposed Structural Layout ➢ Roof Framing• • Pitched Roofs: • Pre - engineered wood trusses • Heavy timber trusses in select areas • Flat Roofs: Wood I- Joists ➢ Floor Framing • Service area over basement: • 200 (8 ") hollowcore precast spanning a maximum of 8.0m • All other areas: • 100 (4 ") concrete slab on grade 2 118 Tacoma Engineers Inc. Project No. TE- 25106 -14 Page 3 of 5 November 20, 2014 MMMC Architects Terrace Lodge, Aylmer ➢ Basement Exterior Walls ••• Poured -in- place, reinforced concrete. • Thickness will depend on height of basement and support of exterior wall (brick etc). • Minimum 250 (10 ") thick ➢ Footings and Foundations • Conventional concrete frost walls on strip footings is proposed with a minimum 1220mm (48 ") frost protection required for all footings. • Conventional reinforced concrete interior pad footings. • A site specific geotechnical report was not available. • A geotechnical report for a new ambulance station on an adjacent property was provided for review (dated June 11, 2007 by Golder Associates). Although the information in this report may not represent the future findings in the specific location of this project, it does provide an insight into the soils of the area. • Based on the data of the two boreholes in this report, a preliminary seismic site class category of `D' may be assumed. A site specific geotechnical investigation will be required prior to any designs to confirm this assumption. • A fill layer was found in the top 1.5m to 2.2m and the recommendation was to construct the building foundations 2.2m to 2.9m below the existing grade. The presence of fill within the proposed project location will require a site specific geotechnical investigation. • An allowable soil bearing capacity at a depth of 2.2m to 2.9m was given at 150 kPa. F. Special Considerations ➢ Lifts supported from the roof trusses over the rooms within the 25 Bed RHA areas are a design requirement. These lifts will be supported directly from the roof truss bottom chords. Interior bearing walls may be required to reduce the unsupported spans of the roof trusses, as indicated on the attached preliminary structural layouts. Per: Sea `s -I enry, P.'n_, Associate Tacoma Engineers Inc. Encl.: Preliminary Structural Layout (3 pages) 3 119 •zr 0 N 0 N 2 0 z 0 >- ct co 11 o_ 011 oV1 I■lat%%%%11)■%%%1W)III\11\ %■1I%%% C) 0 " rr idff 4Kofircf(K67 y - - - ------ / )))\)\)1 syA$$1!:!:!1.111111,•":1„)..,,I...„.J6..'.... \: \......\.\....').!...11:....9.........)11.11..).........::.....1::............1.1.1.1'.11.1.11.1.11:11.1...1.1.11:11.1.11°.1•:.11,11:11.1.111111,:•'14:1':://, - - ••••• •• • •• •• - .r):......... ..... --••• % .))/"---......................, )))1•1111:111/0 1111:)ii0ii$0$*10!.0w 4 \ 1,A,%%%%%%%‘%%%A‘%%1■■%,%,,A■‘w%+'w%1 .72 s vO yowx$00,00, •;(,"' greeicii/Azr ii PRELIMINARY STRUCTURAL LAYOUT NOVEMBER 20, 2014 ) ' / \ )11.0 ‘q,04 0 , 0 0 6 a 0 ``` STEEL BEAM & COLUMN BEARING LINE PRE - ENGINEERED WOOD TRUSSES (PITCHED) WOOD I -JOIST RAFTERS (FLAT ROOF) 11) 0 0 Z 11.12 (1) C) LJLJ LJLJ1151'. 1"11: 111111 ...11111./.111111111../..Hou.1111111111,1111../..1111111111,-.11111 1,111111111111111111111111E11111111 111111111111111111111111111111111 uuuuiouuuuuuuuuuuuuu 1/11, s . P 9 .. /B11 //fAy , . ,FH r,l 1 Yi uuuminuun P.P,s. i%P.P 1111" 111111111111' Terrace Lodge Proposed New 100 Bed Long -Term Care Home Appendix D' Mechanical & Electrical Services Documents Schematic Design Report #3 ��y �))�{ pW�,ryq; &py {p -^.y5 g@ a, i% G'��� ∎� �WII UM&I F 'll 11 man Schematic Design Report 123 1:13 t\nil n e n i '11 oaf' Engineer. ig Terrace Lodge LTC New Addition Aylmer, Ontario Schematic Design Report # 3 Mechanical & Electrical Services December 21, 2014 124 W °��1 yW,ll 1 II��� 111 „� , ;a ° 's e 0 °' 1' W G Ir N RJII II DING CONSU 1I 1” ANTS ^ r f of O' a, r' ti; a b d i n �. Project No. 14 -032 Mechanical & Electrical Systems Schematic Design Report #3 Terrace Lodge LTC- New Addition Aylmer, Ontario Page 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction 3 2. Codes & Standards 3 3. Life Safety & Fire Protection Systems 4 Heating, Ventilating & Air Conditioning Systems 5 5. Plumbing Systems 8 6. Automatic Direct Digital Control Systems 10 7. Emergency Generator 10 8. Electrical power distribution 11 9. Lighting 12 10. Miscellaneous system 12 11. Seismic & Vibration Isolation 12 MILLENNIUM ENGINEERING INC. 125 W °��1 yW,ll 1 II��� 111 „� , ;a ° 's e 0 °' 1' W G Ir N RJII II DING CONSU 1I 1” ANTS ^ r f of O' a, r' ti; a b d i n �. Project No. 14 -032 Mechanical & Electrical Systems Schematic Design Report #3 Terrace Lodge LTC- New Addition Aylmer, Ontario Page 3 1. INTRODUCTION: Terrace Lodge, in Aylmer, Ontario is an existing Long Term Care facility owned by the Regional Municipality, which is planning to construct a new building. The new building is to accommodate 100 beds in four RHAs in a single storey. A partial basement for service related functions under the central core of the building will be considered. An area of 800sf per bed, totaling approximately 80,000sf, will be programmed. The building will be designed to the 2009 MOHLTC Design Standards. 2. CODES & STANDARDS: • Ontario Ministry of Health and Long Term Care Design Standards and Guidelines and interpretations of the requirements of the following codes and standards will be addressed in the design of this project • Ontario Building Code • Ontario Fire Code • Ontario Gas Utilization Code • CAN /CSA- B51 -M1991 Boiler, Pressure Vessel and Pressure Piping Code • CAN /CSA- B52 -92 Mechanical Refrigeration Code • CAN /CSA- Z317.1 -88 Special Requirements for Plumbing Installations in Health Care Facilities • CAN /CSA- Z317.2 —M91 Special Requirements for HVAC Systems in Health Care Facilities • ASHRAE 62 -2007 Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality • ASHRAE 90.1 -2010 Energy Efficient Design for New Buildings • NFPA 10- Portable Fire Extinguishers • NFPA 13- Installation of Sprinkler Systems • NFPA 14- Installation of Standpipe and Hose Systems • NFPA 90A- Installation of Air Conditioning and Ventilating Systems • Ontario Hydro Electrical Safety Code — 2009 • C.S.A. Electrical Bulletins and related C.S.A. Part II standards. • Local Fire Code and ULC Requirements. • Local Hydro Utility Requirements. MILLENNIUM ENGINEERING INC. 126 W °��1 yW,ll 1 II��� 111 „� , ;a ° 's e 0 °' 1' W G IR 11 111. G B 1,i II IL, D II” CONS U1I II" AN TG ^ r f of O' a, r' ti; a b d i n �. Project No. 14 -032 Mechanical & Electrical Systems Schematic Design Report #3 Terrace Lodge LTC- New Addition Aylmer, Ontario Page 4 3. LIFE SAFETY & FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS : 3.1 The proposed building will be fully protected by Automatic Wet Pipe Sprinkler System. The systems will be designed to NFPA 13. The type of sprinklers will be selected in consultation with the Architect to meet the aesthetic of different areas. The Sprinkler System zoning shall correspond to Fire Alarm Zoning. Sprinkler Floor Control Stations will be provided in accordance with NFPA 13. 3.2 Fire Extinguisher Cabinets will be provided in the corridors at each floor and will include Portable Fire Extinguishers to NFPA 10. 3.3 Fire Alarm Systems will be designed to suit the building as per codes. The Building shall have new addressable two stage fire alarm system as per Ontario Building Code requirements. Main fire alarm enunciator panel will be located at the main entrance vestibule that faces an access route for fire truck. Each nurse's station shall have a fire alarm enunciator panel. A ceiling mounted fire detector with relay base will be provided at each resident bed room. Fire alarm audible devices will be installed throughout the common areas. All exit doors at egress route shall be provided with manual stations. A dedicated Monitor with active graphics will be provided in Building Operations Manager's office. CO sensors will be provided in Dryer Room and adjacent occupied rooms. These sensors shall be interlocked to Fire Alarm system. 3.4 The Tender Documents will include a requirement for the Contractor to obtain Owner's Insurance Provider's approval of the Fire Protection Systems of the building. MILLENNIUM ENGINEERING INC. 127 W °��1 yW,ll 1 II��� 111 „� , ;a ° 's e 0 °' 1' W G Ir N RJII II DING CONSU 1I 1” ANTS ^ r f of O' a, r' ti; a b d i n �. Project No. 14 -032 Mechanical & Electrical Systems Schematic Design Report #3 Terrace Lodge LTC- New Addition Aylmer, Ontario Page 5 4. HEATING VENTILATING & AIR CONDITIONING (HVAC) SYSTEMS : Two options for HVAC System are provided. Cost Consultant will provide cost for each system, which will be compared with merits and demerits of each system for final system selection. OPTION 1: Perimeter Radiant Panels and Make Up Air Unit for Residents & Corridors: 4.1 Central Plant : 4.1.1 Two 2500 MBH Condensing Boilers will be used to provide Hydronic heating requirement for the building. Sealed combustion type condensing boilers, such as manufactured by Lochinvar , PK or Viessmann will be provided. 4.1.2 A set of three Variable speed pumps will deliver Hydronic heating water required for the ceiling radiant panels. The capacity of each pump for the above pump sets will be selected to provide the flow rate of 2/3 of total flow rate of the system. One pump of each set of pumps will be stand by. 4.1.3 A hydronic snow melting system will be provided for the locations required by Owner. 4.2 Resident Rooms 4.2.1 All Resident Home Areas and all common areas will be provided with perimeter hot water ceiling radiant panels. For winter temperature controls each resident room will be provided with a radiant panel with occupant controlled thermostat. 4.2.2 For Each RHA (Resident Home Area), Engineered Air Make Up Air Units with ERV will be used. Capacity of each MAU will 6,000 cfm, 25 TR, 600 MBH gas heating. MAU units will be provided with Direct Expansion Cooling to maintain 55 deg F supply air temperature in peak summer. MILLENNIUM ENGINEERING INC. 128 W °��1 yW,ll 1 II��� 111 „� , ;a ° 's e 0 °' 1' W G IR 11 111. G B 1,i II IL, D II” CONS U1I II" AN TG ^ r f of O' a, r' ti; a b d i n �. Project No. 14 -032 Mechanical & Electrical Systems Schematic Design Report #3 Terrace Lodge LTC- New Addition Aylmer, Ontario Page 6 4.2.3 Supply air will be ducted to supply 4 air changes of outdoor air each resident room. Each resident room will be provided with a ceiling diffuser located above bed. Such diffusers have blank -off panel for vertical discharge and supplies air through perimeter. This will avoid supply of air directly to the resident's bed. Central exhaust will be provided for all washrooms which will terminate in Energy Recovery Unit built in to each MAU to recover Energy from exhausted heat and exchange this heat to incoming outdoor air to the building. Corridors will be air conditioned by Roof Top Units or Split Units. 4.3 Common areas 4.3.1 All common areas and staff areas will be provided with Three, 15 TR each, ERV equipped, DX Cooling, Gas Heating, Roof Top Units by using VAV zoned terminals. 4.3.2 Perimeter radiant ceiling panels will be provided for the Common areas with glazing. OPTION 2: Single Zoned Roof Top Units for Residents & Corridors, with Electric Terminal Heating: 4.4 Central Plant : In this system, central hydronic plant will not be required, because ceiling radiant panel heaters will not be provided but small electric tempering heater will be provided for each resident room. 4.5 Resident Rooms Each RHA (Resident Home Area), Constant Volume 15 TR, 6000 CFM, Lennox Roof Top Unit, with ERV, shall be provided. For temperature controls each resident room will be provided with a small electric re- heat coil with occupant controlled thermostat. MILLENNIUM ENGINEERING INC. 129 W °��1 yW,ll 1 II��� 111 „� , ;a ° 's e 0 °' 1' W G IR II I: 1111 N 1, II It, D G II” G:M ONSU 1I II" AN TS ^ r f of O' a, r' ti; a b d i n �. Project No. 14 -032 Mechanical & Electrical Systems Schematic Design Report #3 Terrace Lodge LTC- New Addition Aylmer, Ontario Page 7 Supply air will be ducted to supply 2 air changes of outdoor air each resident room with total air room air changes being approx. 6.4. Central exhaust will be provided for all washrooms which will terminate in Energy Recovery Unit built in to each MAU to recover Energy from exhausted heat and exchange this heat to incoming outdoor air to the building. Each resident room will be provided with ceiling diffuser located above bed. Such diffusers have blank -off panel for vertical discharge and supplies air through perimeter. This will avoid supply of air directly to the resident's bed. Electrical reheat coil shall be of 750 watts. 4.6 Common areas 4.6.1 All common areas and staff areas will be provided with Three, 15 TR each, ERV equipped, DX Cooling, Gas Heating, Roof Top Units by using VAV zoned terminals. Advantage of Option 2 over Option 1: The advantage of Option 2, RTU system over MAU system is that even during the summer, resident rooms temperature can be maintained at comfortable conditions versus tempered air supply through MAU. Building shell R values, will be increased to next climatic zone, to reduce building heating and cooling load and improve the wall surface temperature in winter. Due to increased air supply quantity and improved building shell R values, perimeter heating can be eliminated. Roof Top Units will cost less in installation, operation and maintenance. Corridors will be air conditioned by Roof Top Units. MILLENNIUM ENGINEERING INC. 130 W °��1 yW,ll 1 II��� 111 „� , ;a ° 's e 0 °' 1' W G Ir N RJII II DING CONSU 1I 1” ANTS ^ r f of O' a, r' ti; a b d i n �. Project No. 14 -032 Mechanical & Electrical Systems Schematic Design Report #3 Terrace Lodge LTC- New Addition Aylmer, Ontario Page 8 4.7 Kitchen 4.7.1 Kitchen will be provided with NFPA 96 compliant exhaust duct work and exhaust fan. Variable Flow Exhaust Hood will be used with integral make up air supply plenum, supplying conditioned make up air to the room and not to the hood. 4.7.2 A separate Make up air unit with natural gas heating will provide the makeup air for the kitchen. 4.7.3 A Roof Top Unit with cooling capacity of 6 Tons will provide the cooling for the kitchen. 4.7.4 The Kitchen Consultant will specify the Dishwashers with direct exhaust connections at the inlet and outlet of the dish racks. The enclosure shall be specified with minimum heat loss to the Kitchen. 4.7.5 The Kitchen Consultant will specify the Freezer, Cooler Condensing Units to be located on the roof. 4.8 Laundry 4.8.1 A Roof Top Unit with approximate capacity of 7.5 Tons will provide the cooling for the laundry. 4.8.2 The natural gas dryers will be housed in air tight plenum with access door. This plenum will be provided with Motorized Dampers to Combustion Air Louvers. A ventilation opening at high level in this plenum will be provided per gas codes. This plenum will be provided with a primed floor drain and an electric force flow heater to thaw any snow, which may infiltrate through louvers to the plenum. 4.8.3 The dryer vents will be provided with clean outs and lint trap section. Dirty lint trap alarm will be provided through DDC. 4.9 General Outdoor air will be provided to all areas in the building for good air quality and in accordance with ASHRAE 62.1 and MOH & LTC, Ontario guide lines. MILLENNIUM ENGINEERING INC. 131 W °��1 yW,ll 1 II��� 111 „� , ;a ° 's e 0 °' 1' W G Ir N RJII II DING CONSU 1I 1” ANTS ^ r f of O' a, r' ti; a b d i n �. Project No. 14 -032 Mechanical & Electrical Systems Schematic Design Report #3 Terrace Lodge LTC- New Addition Aylmer, Ontario Page 9 5. PLUMBING SYSTEMS : 5.1 The Domestic Hot Water system 2 No's High Efficiency Condensing Water heaters (approx. 250 MBH each) with 94% efficiency will be used. 2 no's 200 Gal Storage tanks will be used for Hot water storage. 5.2 Domestic Hot water heating plant will provide 140 °F water directly to Laundry / Kitchen and 120 °F water to the residences and common areas through an Armstrong (Brain) hot water automatic mixing valve. Chiller Waste Heat recovery water of 110 deg. F shall be used to pre -heat the Domestic Hot Water. 5.3 Separate re- circulating circuits and pumps will be provided for domestic hot water to the Resident Washrooms (110 deg F) and Laundry / Kitchen (140 deg F). 5.4 Good quality, water efficient, Plumbing Fixtures will be selected in consultation with the Architect & the Owner. Careful selection is required for Toilets so that these require minimum maintenance and also do not transmit excessive noise to Resident Rooms. 5.5 Water Treatment Water Softeners will be provided. Conventional salt softeners will be used. Soft Water will be used for: • The Domestic Hot Water Make Up — 50 ppm • Laundry — 50 ppm • Dish Washer- 5 ppm Duplex Softener with common Salt Tank will be provided. The Water Softener shall of reputed manufacturer such as Culligan or equal. 5.6 Accessories/ Miscellaneous Systems • Air separators, expansion tanks will be provided for each closed system. • Water risers shall be provided with automatic air vents. MILLENNIUM ENGINEERING INC. 132 W °��1 yW,ll 1 II��� 111 „� , ;a ° 's e 0 °' 1' W G Ir N RJII II DING CONSU 1I 1” ANTS ^ r f of O' a, r' ti; a b d i n �. Project No. 14 -032 Mechanical & Electrical Systems Schematic Design Report #3 Terrace Lodge LTC- New Addition Aylmer, Ontario Page 10 • Domestic Hot water system piping shall be of re- circulating type with re- circulating pump. Maximum length of hot water supply pipe, without re- circulation shall be 10 ft. Tour & Anderson or equal Circuit Balancing Valves will be provided to balance each hot water riser. • Gate Valves will not be used. Valves 2 inch and below shall be Ball Valves, above this size Butterfly Valves shall be used. • Entry Vestibules will be provided with electric spot heating force flow heaters or air curtains to contain cold draft to the building. 6. EMERGENCY POWER: Emergency electric power source to this building shall be a stand by diesel generator with a sub base day tank for diesel fuel. The sub base diesel tank shall be sized to provide sufficient diesel fuel for 24 hours of run time on full load. The Generator shall be housed in a sound attenuated steel enclosure adjacent to the building. This Generator is sized to service the full building load. 7. ELECTRICAL POWER DISTRIBUTION: Hydro utility service provider to this building is Hydro One Networks (Beachville, ON). The new hydroelectric service will be brought into the main electrical room of the new building in coordination with Hydro One. Main switch board located in the main electrical room will be a circuit breaker switch board. All feeder cables to all sub panels and equipment will follow a radial distribution system from this main switch board. Main switchboard size shall be 800A- 600Volt 3 phase 4 wire; it is floor mount standalone main switch board. A utility owned pad mount transformer will be mounted close to main electrical room. MILLENNIUM ENGINEERING INC. 133 W °��1 yW,ll 1 II��� 111 „� , ;a ° 's e 0 °' 1' W G IR II I: 1111 N 1, II It, D G II" G:M ONSU 1I II" AN TS ^ r f of O' a, r' ti; a b d i n �. Project No. 14 -032 Mechanical & Electrical Systems Schematic Design Report #3 Terrace Lodge LTC- New Addition Aylmer, Ontario Page 11 In addition to hydro utility meter at the main service, if required owner's energy measurement device with remote communication capability may be provided on distribution panel board. This would facilitate collection of energy consumption data by building management system. The power distribution system, branch wiring and fixtures will be designed in manner so as to minimize the material use and power losses. Floor panels will be located in electrical rooms and convenient locations in the floor corridors in an electrical closet per Architect's acceptance. Power will be provided to all mechanical equipment, building services equipment, owner's equipment, and all interior and exterior lights. Power receptacles will be provided throughout the building in accordance with Interior Designer's layout, owner's requirements and as per code requirements. Separate panels will be provided for UPS power. 8. LIGHTING: Lighting design will provide the illuminations levels in each area as required by the Long Term Care Home Design Guide line 2009 published by Ministry of Health and Long Term Care. Lighting fixtures in all areas shall be with energy efficient T5, T8 and compact florescent Lamps with high efficiency electronic ballasts. In certain cases to improve in indoor lighting power W /ft2 LED lighting fixtures would be used as required. Selection of lights in resident home areas, personal spaces, activity areas and common areas shall be done in coordination with building architect, and interior designer. Lighting in all areas shall be adequate so that residents, staff and visitors can carry out their activities in comfort and safety. Lighting design shall take into account age related vision loss and visual sharpness of the residents, and accordingly the new design will satisfy the lighting levels stipulated by the LTC Design Guide Lines of 2009. Lighting in service areas (utility rooms, storage rooms, and kitchen) with T bar grid ceiling shall be commercial grade recessed lighting fixtures with acrylic lens and T5 or T8 fluorescent lamps. Lighting control in administrative and service areas shall be achieved with occupancy sensors and wherever applicable day light sensors will be provided. MILLENNIUM ENGINEERING INC. 134 W °��1 yW,ll 1 II��� 111 „� , ;a ° 's e 0 °' 1' W G Ir N RJII II DING CONSU 1I 1” ANTS ^ r f of O' a, r' ti; a b d i n �. Project No. 14 -032 Mechanical & Electrical Systems Schematic Design Report #3 Terrace Lodge LTC- New Addition Aylmer, Ontario Page 12 Site lighting standards shall be provided with LED type lighting fixtures, and these will be controlled by timer, photocell and building automation system. 9. AUTOMATIC DIRECT DIGITAL CONTROL SYSTEMS: To save energy and cost of operation a fully operational Direct Digital Control System will be provided for automatic operation of major Mechanical systems and Lighting. The DDC system will control the Mechanical Room major systems such as Boilers, Pumps, Tempering Valves, Make Up Air Unit and temperatures of each common area and each zone heating valve of each resident zone. 10. MISCELLANEOUS SYSTEMS: Communication out lets and raceways will be provided thru out and shall comply with MOH and LTC standards and guide lines. Nurse call system and security system shall be integrated with Fire Alarm system. 11. SIESMIC & VIBRATION ISOLATION : Mechanical & Electrical Systems will be designed to achieve ASHRAE recommended Noise Levels in the spaces by providing proper Vibration Isolation and Sound Silencers. Seismic Restraints will be provided to withstand National Building Code mandated Seismic Data, as required. End of Report MILLENNIUM ENGINEERING INC. 135 Terrace Lodge Proposed New 100 Bed Long -Term Care Home Appendix `E' Site Servicing Functional Report Documents ARcHmrirs 136 Schematic Design Report Terrace Lodge Functional Report By Diverse Technical Services November 2014 137 D.T.S. Introduction Terrace Lodge Functional Report The Terrace Lodge is a 100 bed long -term care homelocatedat 475 Talbot Street East in Aylmer in the Township of Malahide within Elgin County. Elgin County which owns and operates the facility is planning on redeveloping the home on a parcel of land adjacent to the existing building on the same. The new home is to be housed in a separate standalone 80,000 ft2 building. The municipal services for the existing building are all currently tied into the existing municipal systems already present on the site. The new building will be serviced independently from the municipal serviced located within Talbot street right -of -way. The municipal water, wastewater and storm water systems that service the Terrace Lodge are serviced and maintained by the City of Aylmer except for the hydrants which are maintained by Elgin County. They are connected to the City of Aylmer municipal systems. Some of the storm water reaches the Municipal system but most is within a standalone collection system for the site which flows into Catfish Creek which is just beyond the boundary of the site. This report is to validate the feasibility of the project by confirming that the new building can be properly serviced. ■ I • Plant in Sewage teen atiori A'ea ■r jl �r1 ',y ►Se r Citizens Ha loi7e ••• e Cam 64 a io • SAN 1 Area Map with Contours oirServatio4 Area 138 Q; I DOD no❑ r 2 D.T.S. Terrace Lodge Functional Report Existing Site plan 139 3 D.T.S. Terrace Lodge Functional Report Proposed Site Plan Waste Water Background i H 1, * 4 Terrace Lodge wastewater currently flows to the municipal collection system located on Talbot Street which fronts the property. The collection system along Talbot Street is part of the Town of Aylmer's municipalsystem which consists of combined sewers collecting wastewater and storm water.The City Aerated Lagoon facility, which consists of four lagoon cellstreats the municipal wastewater. The 4 140 D.T.S. Terrace Lodge Functional Report wastewater travels mainly via gravity pipes with some pumping stations as required to reach the lagoon facility. The Town of Aylmer has implemented a combined sewer separation program which they are in the progress of separating the flow streams making the system much more feasible. This will also increase the capacity of both systems and significantly reduces the risk a basement flooding with raw sewage, overflows as well as increased capacity and processing capabilities of the Town's Sewage Lagoons. mu u um!uuuuummlu"1111 rmanklois uuuum 11111111111111111 air Drawing showing the existing sanitary sewer line for the Lodge Wastewater Capacity The existing lodge is rated at in the range of approximately 45,000- 50,000 litres of wastewater per day. This flow will be similar for the new building. The existing building is serviced with a 200mm sanitary (wastewater) connection to the municipal sanitary sewer maintenance hole. The sanitary service of similar size will be adequate for the new building. We are proposing to tie -in to the existing connection 5 141 D.T.S. Terrace Lodge Functional Report far enough from the property line as to not impede with the existing water valves that are located closer to the property line as shown in the drawing below. Rod Tapp, Directors of Operations at the Town of Aylmer, indicated that in his opinion their sanitary sewer collection system and their treatment facility have the capacity for the new building. He was also keeping in mind that this is before the separation of the sanitary and storm sewers in the municipality is completed resulting in a more conservative situation. All of the exact details should be verified in the design portion of this project to verify the flows and the existing service condition along with the actual capacities of the existing collection and treatment systems. The wastewater services for the new building will meet the current local and Provincial requirements regarding materials, installation and flow characteristics. Drawing showing the red dashed line for the sanitary connection option to the new building. 6 142 D.T.S. Storm Water Terrace Lodge Functional Report The site is 7.4 hectares and consists of two distinct sections with a very narrow portion connecting the properties together. The north east section is not directly involved in the area of the proposed development and has its own storm water characteristic. Based on this we will not be considering the north east section of the property any further in this report. This section is hatched in the drawing below. The remaining section of the site where the existing and proposed buildings are located is 5.3 hectares. Map showing the Two Sections of the Property. 143 7 D.T.S. Terrace Lodge Functional Report The site is generally elevated to the north of the site and falls away in all directions with no water flowing onto the site. The general overall flow from the area is towards CatfishCreek which runs along the west and north of the properly just beyond the property lines. The creek actually crosses the property along the north boundary in the north section of the property which we are not considering. There are currently two piped storm sewer systems on the site. One of the collection systems collects storm water via catch basins to the north and west of the existing building and outlets to the north of the site to the Creek just beyond the property boundary. The collection pipes are lower in this section as they also collect the water from the basement level of the building. The second collection system collects storm water via catch basins from the north of the building and east along the ring road that travels to the parking lot south east of the building. The second collection system sewer has a much higher elevation than the first one by a minimum of 2 metres. There is no piped storm water system along the south of the property other than overland flow. The overland flow flows towards the east unimpeded or towards Talbot Road adjacent the entrance or via a swale that outlets between the housing lots fronting Talbot Street. The swale is not operating properly as water is pooling at the swale around the property line of the site. The new building is proposed to be located to the south south -east of the existing building and is tight up along the property line offset boundaries along the south and east property lines as shown in the figure below. Due to the building's configuration and the new parking lots the drainage patterns of the site will have to be changed significantly. SWM Requirements The existing site has a 19% impervious surface area. With the proposed development the site impervious area will increase to 37 %. This results in a significant increase in the storm water runoff. To address the increase in storm water runoff the Town of Aylmer requires that storm water quantity and quality control be incorporated in the proposed development to meet the current runoff conditions. The following table outlines the preliminary site runoff characteristics of the existing and proposed site in the area of the proposed development.The final design will further verify the details. The Rational Method has been used as the basis of this evaluation. 8 144 D.T.S. Terrace Lodge Functional Report The table above indicates that the post development condition has a slightly higher average runoff coefficient. The difference between the existing conditions and the proposed conditions at the maximum runoff rate is approximately 226 litres per second for a fifteen minute time period for a five year storm. Based on the above, it is proposed to control the post development flow to the pre - development flow to the sewers for the 5 year storm event. A 15 minutes time of concentration is used for this analysis. The maximum existing flow for the 5 -year design storm from the catchment area is 399.6 L/s and 764.7 L/s for the 100 -year design storm. The existing storm sewers are believed to outlet to the Catfish Creek, as per the information provided by Rod Tapp from the City of Aylmer, just north and North -west of the site. The storm lines can also be seen in the drawing on the next page which appears to be exiting just north of the site at two different locations. More accurate information will be needed if the project goes ahead to obtain more accurate details of the existing sewer system and its outlets. 9 145 Runoff Coefficient Existing Conditions Proposed Conditions Roof Area 0.94 2664.5 10566.0 Paved Area 0.96 7200.5 9393.0 Landscaped Area 0.20 43421.0 33327.0 Total Site Area 53286.0 53286.0 Average Runoff Coefficient 0.34 0.48 The table above indicates that the post development condition has a slightly higher average runoff coefficient. The difference between the existing conditions and the proposed conditions at the maximum runoff rate is approximately 226 litres per second for a fifteen minute time period for a five year storm. Based on the above, it is proposed to control the post development flow to the pre - development flow to the sewers for the 5 year storm event. A 15 minutes time of concentration is used for this analysis. The maximum existing flow for the 5 -year design storm from the catchment area is 399.6 L/s and 764.7 L/s for the 100 -year design storm. The existing storm sewers are believed to outlet to the Catfish Creek, as per the information provided by Rod Tapp from the City of Aylmer, just north and North -west of the site. The storm lines can also be seen in the drawing on the next page which appears to be exiting just north of the site at two different locations. More accurate information will be needed if the project goes ahead to obtain more accurate details of the existing sewer system and its outlets. 9 145 D.T.S. Terrace Lodge Functional Report Green lines showing the existing storm sewers lines installed at the Lodge. Quantity & Quality Control The analysis determined that storm water detention is required to maintain the maximum pre - development flow rate as a result of the increase in impervious areas within the site. The detention storage required based upon the proposed addition within the site is 285.7m3 for the 100 year storm 10 146 D.T.S. Terrace Lodge Functional Report and 149.3 m3 for the 5 year storm.This is proposed to be done with a storm water pond at the west end of the site. A dry pond is recommended although it may have to be fenced if a significant depth is required as opposed to a larger pond surface area. Some parking lot and pipe storage could also be utilized to reduce the size of the pond. It is anticipated that a storm water detention facility be constructed to the north west of the site near the outlet of the first (lower) storm sewer collection system for the site. This is as there is significant landscaped area and it is very close to the existing storm sewer outlet as well as a low area of the site. It is recommended that the second (higher) storm sewer collection system be connected to the first (lower) system to allow for one pond instead of two. This will provide a more efficient system than several ponds and quality treatment units throughout the site. It is proposed to review the existing first (lower) collection system's capacity as it may have to collect most of if not all of the 100 year storm flows especially in some areas due to the distance from the outlet and potential to create flooding on neighboring properties. Once the roof and parking lot outlets are known this can be determined. The collection system will be expanded to collect the area of the second (upper) collection system and extent to the Quality Control Structures which will be incorporated into the discharge from the pond. The sizes of the existing sewers must be evaluated to ensure they can handle the additional flow due to the increase development and collection area. The elevations of the first (lower) collection system appear to be sufficient to collect the storm water of the site although the existing sewers will likely have to be increased in size. The overland flow routes for major storm events will have to be investigated further, but based on the information to date there will be several locations throughout the site that these routes could be utilized under major storm events should be considered. These are at the proposed pond location, at the existing second outlet from the site, the swale through the residential property and ditch along Talbot Street adjacent the entrance. Rod Tapp, Directors of Operations at the Town of Aylmer, has indicated that the city also requires quality control devices on the storm lines leaving the site. The Town requires MOE approved storm water quality control structures to include oil, grit and sediment retention /removal properties (meeting the MOE requirement for Total Suspended Solids) to minimize harmful particles entering the waterways.lt is proposed to use manufactured water quality control structures like a Stormceptor to handle the water quality requirements. The location of these structures can be determined in the design. Some treatment can be done in the pond as well if desired. 11 147 D.T.S. Terrace Lodge Functional Report Significant grading will be required for this site due to the size of the building and the change in elevation across the site. The grades will have to be arranged to collect the storm water from running off the site along the boundaries of the new building and its infrastructure. We recommend that if possible the finished floor elevation of the new building be considered regarding the surrounding site. ®®_ �® ®OM 1®_ MOW 1®L 1®I® ®1 legal _ I®1> 1o11o1®Ici6I Storm Water Servicing Option 148 12 D.T.S. Terrace Lodge Functional Report The approximate location of a possible option to collect the storm water from the site is shown above. This will have to be reviewed and considered with other possible options. There will also have to be significant grading to handle the storm water within the site as the configuration and large foot print of the building. Other storm water quantity storage options were considered like multiple storage areas, pipe storage, maintaining both collection systems, etc., but one outlet seems most viable due to the amount of storage required although a combination may work out best once the final details of the site are verified. The outlet must be verified and its suitability verified. The storm sewers, pond, quality control structures and all appurtenances should meet the current local and Provincial requirements regarding materials, installation and flow characteristics. Water Background The existing building is currently serviced by a 100mm water service line which connects to a 150mm water main off of Talbot Road. However we recommend that the services be verified in the Design phase to validate the accuracy of the initial information provided to us. Water Capacity After communicating with Rod Tapp, Directors of Operations at the Town of Aylmer, he indicated that they believed that the current municipal the proposed 80,000 Sq. Ft. building. We also looked at the Aylmer Water Distribution System - 2013 Summary Report which we have attached to this report. This report covers the period from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2013 and the existing system average daily flow (3319 m3 /day) operates at about 29.5% of the capacity of the system (11232 m3 /day). The maximum daily flow that the system has encountered was at 4755 m3 /day which is still well below the system's maximum capacity. Based on this information it appears the system should be able to handle increased demand from the new construction. 13 149 D.T.S. Terrace Lodge Functional Report Blue line showing the existing water connection to the Lodge. We also communicated with Clayton Watters, director of the Engineering department from the Elgin County. The County is in charge of the maintenance of the fire hydrants outside of the City of Aylmer boundaries which the Lodge is located on. They have provided us with a flow test on the fire hydrant servicing the Lodge that we have attached to this document. Based on the information provided to us, the residual pressure on site is 275.80 kpa and the residual flow is 3482.00 L /min. The maximum day demand and fire flow should be at a pressure not less than 140 kpa at the hydrant which the site does. Base on this information it appears that there is enough flow to provide fire protection. We do however recommend that another flow test be done in the Design Phase to verify the capacity of the water main servicing that area. 14 150 D.T.S. Terrace Lodge Functional Report New water main service of a minimum size of 200mm is required due the sprinkler requirements. A domestic water service can be taken off the main service line closer to the building. The water service should meet all local and Provincial requirements. Blue line showing the water servicing option. 151 15 D.T.S. Terrace Lodge Functional Report Roadways and Parking Lot Criteria The roadways and parking lots should be designed based on the current local and /or the Provincial Criteria based on the recommendations of the pending geotechnical report. The slopes should be between 2 &5% and no pooling of water. 16 152 D.T.S. Terrace Lodge Functional Report Appendix A Water Flow Testing Information 153 Council Meeting to be held on: Feb. 03, 2014 Submitted by: Rod Tapp Bill Berry gi, For: Action Agenda Item # Subject: Aylmer Water Distribution System Summary & Annual Reports. BACKGROUND: The Aylmer Distribution Water System in accordance with the Ontario Drinking Water Systems Regulations is required to complete and publish a Municipal Summary Report and also an Annual Report for the Water System. As part of this annual process, all members of Council are issued copies of the reports to review, endorse and adopt by resolution prior to being published. ANALYSIS: Please see copies of the reports attached. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1.) That as required by Ontario Regulation 170/03, Schedule 22, Section 22 -2, (1)(a), Council receives and approves the Aylmer Distribution System Municipal Summary Report for the year 2013 and furthermore Council also receives and approves the Aylmer Distribution System Annual Report for the year 2013 as required by Ontario Regulation 170/03, Section 11." 2.) The Town posts a copy of the Reports on the Town's web site and also provides copies available for public viewing at the front counter at Town Hall. 3.) The Town forwards a copy of the Aylmer Distribution System Annual Report to the Township of Malahide. 154 Town of Aylmer Council Resolution Moved By Date Seconded By "That as required by Ontario Regulation 170/03, Schedule 22, Section 22 -2, (1)(a), Council receives and approves the Aylmer Distribution System Municipal Summary Report for the year 2013. Council also receives and approves the Aylmer Distribution System Annual Report for the year 2013 as required by Ontario regulation 170/03, Section 11." Council authorizes staff to post a copy of the reports on the Town's website and provide copies available for public viewing at the front counter at Town Hall and furthermore, forward a copy of the Aylmer Distribution Water System Annual Report to the Township of Malahidc. 155 Aylmer Distribution System — 2013 Summary Report January 2014 Summary Report Requirements Introduction The 2013 Summary Report for the Aylmer Distribution System is submitted to satisfy Schedule 22 of Ontario Regulation 170/03. As described in O.Reg 170.03, the report must: a) list the requirements of the Act, the regulations, the system's approval, drinking water works permit, municipal drinking water licence and any orders applicable to the system that were not met at any time during the period covered by the report and b) for each requirement not met in part a), specify the duration of the failure and the measures that were taken to correct the failure. The summary report must also include the following information to assist the owner in assessing the capability of the system to meet existing and future uses for the system: 1) A summary of the quantities and flow rates of the water supplied during the period covered by the report, including monthly average and maximum daily flows. 2) A comparison of the summary results to the rated capacity and flow rates approved in the system's approval, drinking water works permit or municipal drinking water licence, or if the system is receiving all of its water from another system under an agreement, to the flow rates specified in the written agreement. This report covers the period from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2013. Overview The Town of Aylmer is supplied water by the Aylmer Secondary System which delivers water from the Elgin Middlesex Pumping Station to the town limits by means of a 450 mm water main. The Aylmer Distribution System (waterworks #260002136) is classified as a Large Municipal Residential Water System. and operates under Drinking Water Licence #044 -101 and Drinking Water Works Permit #044 -201. Table 1 Drinking Water Legislation List of requirements the Duration of the system failed to meet failure Safe Drinking Water Act Ontario Regulations Exceeded max acceptable stnds as set out by O.Reg 169/03 Sched. 1 -1 E.Coli and 2 Total Coliform at 80 Rutherford Dec 16/13 -3 Total Coliform at 23 Myrtle St Dec 16/13 AWQI# 115369 for both occurences 156 Original sample was Dec 16/13, Resampled Dec 17 and Dec 18. Measures that were taken to correct problem Flushed lines and resampled. Tested for free CL2 residual as per Health Unit/MOE directions. Status: mW- .. - --1. (complete or incomplete) Completed DWL #044 -101. DWWP #044 -201 (as of Aug. 4/11) Provincial Officer's Order No. Works permit/ Licence Table 1 lists the requirements that the system failed to meet and the measures taken to correct the failure Water Quantity Summary Table 2 provides an overview of the flows entering the Aylmer Distribution System at Chamber 16 as recorded by the SCADA system. Table 2 January February March April May June July Au ust September October Total Flow (m3) 98033 87952 94923 95582 110156 108053 106854 120042 103607 100057 Average Daily Flow (m3 /day) 3162 3141 3062 3186 3553 3601 3446 3872 3453 3227 Max Daily Flow (m3/day) 3479 4755 3484 3537 4289 4421 4356 4546 3984 3657 Min Daily Flow (m3 /day) 2865 2278 1874 2876 2929 2959 2183 3271 3016 2995 Total Reverse Flow (m3) 5197 4890 5007 5056 5761 4749 4511 4592 4145 3694 November December Total 92187 94052 1211498 2972 3033 3319 3426 3466 4755 2380 2397 1874 3516 4119 55237 Flow data for the period Jan 1, 2013 to Dec 31, 2013 The maximum daily flow to the system occurred on February 9, 2013 with a daily total of 4755 m3. The total flow from the EMPS to Aylmer averaged 3319 m3 /day. The numbers change when one takes into account the reverse flow through the meter at Chamber 16. When the reverse flow is subtracted from the total flow, the annual flow drops to 1156261 m3 for the year 2013. This also changes the average daily flow from 3319 to 3167 m3 /day for 2013. Using the figure 130 I/sec as the EMPS p p capacity, the total daily flow for the Aylmer Secondary line is 11232 m3 /day. The current average daily flow (3319 m3 /day) uses only 29.5 % of the system's capacity. This number is comparable to the previous year's number of 30.5 % This information is collected in order to assist the owner in assessing the present capacity of the water system. A copy of this report shall be submitted to Council no later than March 31, 2014. Ontario Drinking -Water Systems Regulation O. Reg. 170103 Annual Report - 2013 Drinking -Water System Number: Drinking -Water System Name: Drinking -Water System Owner: Drinking -Water System Category: Period being reported: 260002136 Aylmer Distribution System The Corporation of the Town of Aylmer Large Municipal January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2013 Complete if your CateRory is Large Municipal Residential or Small Municipal Residential Does your Drinking -Water System serve more than 10,000 people? Yes [ 1 No [ X ] Is your annual report available to the public at no charge on a web site on the Internet? Yes [X1 No[ l Location where Aylmer Distribution System Annual Report required under O. Reg. 170/03 Schedule 11 will be available for viewing inspection. Town of Aylmer 46 Talbot St W Aylmer, Ontario N5H 1J7 519- 773 -3164 www nvImer ra Complete for all other Categories. Number of Designated Facilities served: Did you provide a copy of your annual report to all Designated Facilities you serve? Yes [ I No I Number of Interested Authorities you report to: Did you provide a copy of your annual report to all Interested Authorities you report to for each Designated Facility? Yes [ I No [ Note: For the following tables below, additional rows or columns may be added or an appendix may be attached to the report List all Drinking -Water Systems (if any), which receive all of their drinking water from your system: Drinking Water System Name Malahide Distribution System - Dingle Street - Talbot Street East Drinking Water System Number #260004774 Did you provide a copy of your annual report to all Drinking -Water System owners that are connected to you and to whom you provide all of its drinking water? Yes [ X I No [ I Drinking Water Systems Regulations (PIBS 4435e01) December 2011 158 Page 1 of 6 rv__ t"-->0 ntario Drinking -Water Systems Regulation O. Reg. 170/03 Indicate how you notified system users that your annual report is available, and is free of charge. [ X J Public aecesslnotice via the web [ ] Public aecesslnotice via Government Office [ I Public aecesslnotice via a newspaper [ X I Public aecesslnotice via Public Request [ ] Public aceesslnotiee via a Public Library [ ] Public aceesslnotiee via other method Describe your Drinking -Water System Treated water is supplied to the Town of Aylmer from the Elgin Water Treatment Plant via the Elgin Area Primary Water Supply System, the Elgin- Middlesex Reservoir, and the Aylmer Secondary System. When required, two pumps, located at the Elgin - Middlesex Pumping Station in St. Thomas, pump water to Aylmer through a 450 mm dia. secondary transmission main (the Aylmer Secondary System). The main leaves the Pumping Station and proceeds along the north side of Hwy #3, through the Municipality of Central Elgin and Malahide Township until it connects to the Aylmer Distribution System at Bodkin Ave. Depending on system pressure and demand, the Secondary System may be used to directly feed the Distribution System or may be used to fill a 4,300 m3 standpipe located at 23 Myrtle Street. There is a continuous chlorine monitor, a tower level indicator and pressure sensor located at the standpipe. The Aylmer Distribution System consists of approximately 42 kilometers of water main of varying sizes (50 mm to 450mm) and types (cast iron, ductile iron, DR -18 plastic, transite). There are nine meter chambers, 200 fire hydrants and approximately 347 street valves within the system. List all water treatment chemicals used over this reporting period Sodium hypoehlorite 12% was used to disinfect tools and repair parts for main breaks on St George St, Myrtle St. and Talbot St W and a service leak on Oak St. Were any significant expenses incurred to? [ J Install required equipment [ X ] Repair required equipment Drinking Water Systems Regulations (PIBS 4435e01) December 2011 159 Page 2 of 6 tir Ontario Drinking-Water Systems Regulation 0. Reg. 170/03 [ X I Replace required equipment Please provide a brief description and a breakdown of monetary expenses incurred Tower upgrades-ladder, climbing equipt $15,264.00 Tower inspection $3,816.00 Valve maintenance program .$2,172.00 Provide details on the notices submitted in accordance with subsection 18(1) of the Safe Drinking-Water Act or section 16-4 of Schedule 16 of O.Reg.170/03 and reported to Spills Action Centre Incident Date Dee 16/13 Dec 16/13 Parameter Total Coliform at 23 Myrtle St Total Coliform E.Coli Both at 80 Rutherford St Result 3 2 1 Unit of Measure efu/100 ml efu/100 ml efu/100 ml Corrective Action flush/resample flush /resample flush/resample Corrective Action Date Dee 17/13 Dee 17/13 Dee 17/13 Microbiological testing done under the Schedule 10, 11 or 12 of Regulation 170/03, during this reporting period. Raw Treated Distribution Number of Samples 261 Range of E.Coli Or Fecal Results (min #)-(max 0-1 Range of Total Coliform Results (min #)-(max #) 0-3 Number of HPC Samples 106 Range of HPC Results (min #)-(max #) <10 to 190 Operational testing done under Schedule 7, 8 or 9 of Regulation 170/03 during the eriod covered by this Annual Report. p Turbidity Chlorine Fluoride (If the DWS provides fluoridation) Number of Grab Samples 261 grab 8760 at CL17 Range of Results (min #)-(max #) 0.60 to 1.28 0.00 to 2.00 Drinking Water Systems Regulations (PIBS 4435e01) December 2011 160 Unit of Measure mg/L mg/L NOTE: For continuous monitors use 8760 as the number of samples. Page 3 of 6 j,' Ontario Drinking -Water Systems Regulation 0. Reg. 170103 Summary of additional testing and sampling carried out in accordance with the requirement of an approval, order or other legal instrument. Date Sampled Date of legal instrument issued Parameter Result Unit of Measure Summary of Inorganic parameters tested during this reporting period or the most recent sample results Parameter Antimony Arsenic Barium mm, Boron Cadmium Chromium *Lead Mercury Selenium Sodium Uranium Fluoride Nitrite Nitrate Sample Date Result Value Unit of Measure Exceedanee *only for drinking water systems testing under Schedule 15.2; this includes large municipal non- residential systems, small municipal non - residential systems, non - municipal seasonal residential systems, large non - municipal non - residential systems, and small non - municipal non - residential systems Summary of lead testing under Schedule 15.1 during this reporting period (applicable to the following drinking water systems; large municipal residential systems, small municipal residential systems, and non - municipal year -round residential systems) Unit of Measure Location Type Plumbing Distribution Number of Samples 16 Drinking Water Systems Regulations (PIGS 4435e01) December 2011 Range of Lead Results (min #) — (max #) 0.08 - 0.60 161 Number of Exeeedanees 0 Page 4 of 6 v' Ontario Drinking-Water Systems Regulation 0. Reg. 170/03 Summary of Organic parameters sampled during this reporting period or the most recent samjle...usults Parameter Sample Result Unit of Exceedance Alaehlor Aldiearb Aldrin + Dieldrin Atrazine + N-dealkylated metobolites Azinphos-methyl Bendiocarb Benzene Benzo(a)pyrcne Bromoxynil Carbaryl Carbofuran Carbon Tetraehloride Chlordane (Total) Chlorpyrifos Cyanazine Diazinon Dieamba 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 1,4-Dichlorobenzene Diehlorodiphenyltriehloroethane (DDT) + metabolites 1,2-Dichloroethane 1,1-Dichloroethylene (yinylidene chloride) Diehloromethane 2-4 Dichlorophenol 2,4-Diehlorophenoxy acetic acid (2,4-D) Dielofop-methyl Dimethoate Dinoscb Diquat Diuron Glyphosate Heptaehlor + Heptachlor Epoxide Lindane (Total) Malathion Methoxyehlor Metolachlor Drinking Water Systems Regulations (PIBS 4435e01) December 2011 Date Value Measure 162 [age S of 6 Ontario Drinking-Water Systems Regulation 0. Reg. 170103 Metribuzin Monoehlorobenzene Parameter Paraq uat Parathion Pentachlorophenol Phorate Picloram Polychlorinated Biphcnyls(PCB) Prometryne Simazine Sample Date Result Value Unit of Measure edance THM (NOTE: show latest annual avera Te) Tem ephos Terbufos 24.75 Tetrachloroethylene 2,3,4,6-Tetraehlorophenol Triallate Triehloroethylene 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 2,4,5-Triehlorophenoxy acetic acid (2,4,5-T) Trifluralin Vinyl Chloride List any Inorganic or Organic parameter(s) that exceeded half the standard prescribed in Schedule 2 of Ontario Drinkinl Water Qu h Standards. Parameter Result Value Unit of Measure Date of Sample Drinking Water Systems Regulations Page 6 of 6 (PIBS 4435e0 I ) December 201 I 163 SPRINKLER SYSTEM ANALYSIS (METRIC) CALCULATION #1 Contractor : C & H Fire Suppression Systems Inc. Company Address:103-274 Shirley Ave., Kitchener, Ontario, N2B 2E1 JOB NAME : Terrace Lodge ADDRESS : Alymer Description :Proposed Sprinkler Layout DESIGNER : J.H. Authority : Local CONTRACT #WO 16508 REF. TO DRAWING #SP-lof3 HAZARD DESCRIPTION: Light Hazard 2nd Floor CALCULATION CRITERIA:- TOTAL AREA : 83.6 MA2 DENSITY : 4.100 L /Min /M ^2 Max.AREA /SPRINKLER : 14.5 MA2 # OF SPRINKLER : 12 Min. Safety : 35 KPa SYSTEM REQUIREMENT:- Node System Hose Hydrant 1 /min 1/min 1/min 58 896.00 378.54 567.79 WAGE: 1 OF 12 DATE: 05.25.2010 Total 1 /min 1842.33 SOURCE INFORMATION:- SUPPLY STATIC PRESSURE RESIDUAL PRESSURE RESIDUAL FLOW 58 399.90 kpa 275.80 kpa 3482.00 1 /min FIRE PUMP RATING: PUMP PRESSURE SPRINKLER K= 8.06 OVERHEAD PIPE C= 120 UNDERGROUND Cc 140 FLOW TOTAL SAFETY = 53.06 KPa Below Supply FILE: E:\Justin Jobs \Terrace Lodge\2nd floor calc.mdb Pressure kpa 308.62 166 PAGE #,4 C & H Fire Suppression Systems Inc. SPRINKLER SYSTEM ANALYSTS (METRIC) JO13 NAME: Terrace Lodge FILE: E:1Justin Jobs /Terrace Lodge /2nd floor calc.mdb NODE ELEVATION PRESSURE DISCHARGE WASTAGE m. kpa 1 /min 1 8.58 134.20 93.47 66.9 2 9.05 134.32 3 9.05 140.22 4 8.95 148.29 5 8.71 113.49 85.95 53.5 6 9.05 113.72 7 9.05 117.68 8 8.71 116.75 87.17 55.7 9 9.05 117.06 10 8.58 124.42 89.99 60.7 11 9.05 126.57 12 9.05 126.95 13 9.05 127.94 14 9.05 137.94 15 8.95 148.30 16 8.58 48.70 56.30 0.5 17 9.05 45.94 18 8.58 48.28 56.06 0.1 19 9.05 45.51 20 8.71 60.62 62.82 5.8 21 8.71 58.76 61.85 4.2 22 9.05 57.36 23 8.71 70.60 67.79 21.0 24 9.05 69.55 25 8.71 70.01 67.51 20.5 26 9.05 68.95 27 8.58 81.16 72.68 29.8 28 9.05 79.52 29 9.05 49.45 30 9.05 61.19 31 9.05 75.45 32 9.05 84.08 33 9.05 122.59 34 8.95 148.3.8 35 8.58 136.29 94.39 68.2 36 9.05 136.47 37 9.05 142.45 38 8.95 150.63 39 8.95 178.20 40 8.95 163.42 41 8.95 173.47 42 8.95 175.06 43 8.95 178.20 44 8.95 181.87 45 3.60 237.24 46 3.60 239.12 167 NODE ELEVATION PRESSURE DISCHARGE WASTAGE m. kpa 1 /min 47 3.60 48 3.60 49 3.60 50 3.60 51 3.60 52 3.60 53 3.60 54 1.80 55 0.91 56 0.91 57 0.30 58 0.00 242.55 244.19 246.78 250.52 253.48 256.76 258.32 276.53 290.99 291.54 378.54 HOSE 301.54 308.62 567.79 HOSE 168 PAGE # 5 JOE NAME: Terrace Lodge FILE: E:\Justin Jobs \Terrace ?IPE NODE FLOW DIA. No. No. 1/min mm. Lodge \2nd floor calc.mdb LENGTH FRICTION m. kpa /m. PRESSURE kpa 1 QN =93.97 D=2 6.65 QP =93.48 2 QI4 =0.00 D =26. 65 3 QP =93.48 L=0.47 F=0.61 FT=E LT =1. 08 4.369 PAGE # 6 • ,. PT =134.20 K=8.06 FF =4.72 V =2.79 PE = -4.61 C =120.0 PT =134.32 Pv =3.90 L =0.74 F =-0.61 FT =E LT=1.35 4.369 PT- 134.32 K =0.00 PF =5.90 V =2.79 PE=0.00 C =120.0 PT=140.22 Pv =3.90 3 QN =0.00 172 6.65 QP =93.4 8 L=0.10 F=1.52 FT=T LT= .62 4.369 PT =L40.22 K =0.00 P17. 10 V=2,79 PE =0.98 C =120.0 PT =148,29 Pv -3.90 5 QN =85.95 D-26. 65 6 QP =85.97 L.0.34 F =0.61 FT =E LT =0.95 3.741 PT=113.49 K =8.06 PF =3.56 V =2.57 PE= -3.33 C =I2 0.0 PT =113.72 Pv =3.30 6 QN =0.00 7 QP =85.97 1726.65 L =0.45 F-0.61 FT =E LT =1.06 3.741 PT =113.72 K =0.00 PF -3,97 V =2.57 PE =0.00 C=120.0 PT =117.68 Pv =3.30 7 QN =0.00 D=26.65 11 QP -85.97 L =0.85 F =1.52 FT=T LT -2.37 3.741 PT =117.68 K =0.00 PF=8.88 V =2.57 PE =0.00 C =120.0 PT =126.57 Pv=3.30 8 QN =87.17 D =26.65 9 QP =87.19 L-0.34 F=0.61 FT =E LT =O , 95 3.840 PT =116.75 K=8.06 PF=3.65 V =2.61 'E= -3.33 C =120.0 PT =117.06 Pv =3, 39 9 QN =0.00 D=26. 65 12 QP=87.19 L =1.05 F-1.52 FT =T LT =2,57 3.840 PT =11 7.0 6 K =0.00 14'1=9.89 V =2 , 61 PE =0.00 C =120.0 PT= 126.95 Pv -3.39 10 QN =89.99 D=26.65 13 QP -90.01 L =0.47 F=1.52 FT =T. LT =1. 99 4.074 PT= 124.42 K =8.06 PF==8. 12 V-2.69 PE =-4.61 C- 120.0 PT =127.94 Pv =3.61 11 10 =0.0R D =35.05 12 QP =85.97 L =0.39 F =0.00 FT -0 LT =0.39 0.985 169 PT=126.57 K =0.00 PF =O. 38 V=1,49 PE -0.00 C- 120.0 Pr= L26. 95 Pv=1 .10 JOB 'N.ME: Terrace Lodge FILE: E :\Justin Jobs\Terrace Lodge12nd floor calc.mdb PIPE NODE FLOW DIA. LENGTH FRICTION PRESSURE No. No. 1/min mm. m. kpa /m. kpa PAGE # 7 12 QN =0.00 11 D40.89 13 QP =173.16 L=0.58 F=0.00 FT--0 LT =0.58 1.701 PT= 126.95 K =0.00 PF =0.99 V =2.20 PE =0.00 C =120.0 PT=127.94 Pv =2.41. 13 QN =O.00 12 D=40.89 14 QP =263.17 L=1.49 F=1.22 FT =E LT =2.71 3.693 PT =127.94 K =0.00 PF =10.01 V =3.34 PE =0.00 C =120.0 PT =137.94 Pv =5.57 14 QN =0.00 13 D=40.89 15 QP- 263.17 L =0.10 F =2.44 FT -T LT =2.54 3.693 PT= 137.94 K =0.00 PF =9.38 V =3.34 PE =0.98 C=120.0 PT =148.30 Pv =5.57 16 QN =56.30 14 D-26.65 17 QP =56.32 L =0.47 F =0.61 FT =E LT-1.08 1.710 PT =48.70 PF =1.85 PE=-4.61 PT =45.94 K =8.06 V=1.68 C=120.0 Pv =1.. 41 17 QN 0.00 15 D =26.65 29 QP=56.32 L =0.53 F =1.52 FT =T LT =2.05 1.710 PT =4 5.94 PF=3.51 PE -0.00 PT =49.45 K =0.00 V =1.68 C=120.0 Pv =1..41 18 QN 56.06 •6 I»26. 65 19 QP =56.08 L =0.47 F =0.61 FT =S LT =1.08 1.696 PT= -48.28 PF=1.83 PE= -4.61 PT 45.51 K8.06 V =1.68 0120.0 Pv =1.40 19 QN =0.00 7 D -26.65 29 QP=56.08 L =0.80 F =1.52 FT =T LT -2.32 1.696 PT =45.51 PF =3.94 PE =0.00 PT=49.45 K -0.00 V =1.68 C =120.0 Pv=1.40 20 QN =62.82 D =26.65 30 QP =62.84 L =0.34 F=1.52 FT=T LT-1.86 2.094 PT =60.62 PF =3.90 PE= -3.33 PT=61.19 21 QN =61.85 D =26.65 22 QP=61.86 L =0.34 F=0.61 FT =E LT =0.95 2.034 PT =58.76 PF =3..93 PE= -3.33 PT -57.36 K =8.06 V=1.88 C =120.0 Pv =1.76 K=8.06 V =1.85 C =120.0 Pv =1.71 22 QN =0.00 L=0.36 D =26.65 F =1.52 FT =T 30 QP=61.86 LT =1.88 2.034 PT =57.36 t =0.00 PF =3.83 V =1.85 PE =0.00 C =120.0 J?T=61.19 Pv =1.71 170 JOB NAME: Terrace Lodge FILE: E:\Justin Jobs /Terrace Lodge/2nd floor calc.mdb 'IPE NODE FLOW DIA. LENGTH FRICTION PRESSURE No. No. 1/m .n mm. m. kpa /m. kpa PAGE 0 8 23 QN =67.79 D= -26.65 24 QP =67.81 L =0.34 F =0.61 FT =E LT-0.95 2.411 PT =76.60 PF =2.29 PE=-3.33 PT =69.55 K =8.06 V2.03 C =120.0 Pv =2.05 24 0=0.66 2 D=26.65 31 QP =67.81 L =0.92 F =1.52 FT =T LT-2.44 2.411. PT -69.55 PF =5.89 PE-0.00 PT -75.45 K =0.06 V =2.03 C=120.0 Pv =2.65 25 QN =67.51 1 D =26.65 26 QP =67.53 L =0.34 F =0.61 FT =E LT =0. 95 2.392 PT=70.01 PF=2.27 PE=-3.33 PT =68,95 K =8.66 V =2.02 C =120.0 Pv =2.03 26 QN =0.00 0=26.65 31 QP =67.53 L =1.19 F =1.52 FT =T LT =2.71 2.392 PT =68.95 PLC`=6, 49 PE -0.00 PT =75.45 K =0.00 V-2.02 C=120.0 Pv =2.03 27 0=72.68 D26.65 2& QP =72.76 28 QN =0.00 32 QP= 72.70 0 =26.65 L =0.47 F =0.61 FT =E LT =1.08 2.743 PT=81.16 PF =2.96 PE==- -4.6 PT =79.52 K8.06 V =2,17 C-120.0 Pv =2.36 L=0.14 F=1.52 FTT LT =1.66 2.743 PT =79.52 PF =4.57 PE =6. 0© PT =84.08 K -0.00 V =2.17 C =120.6 Pv =2.36 29 QI =0.60 D =26.65 30 QP=112.40 L==1.91. F=0.00 FT =0 LT =1.91 6.147 30 QN =6. ©0 D=35.05 31 QP =237.16 L =2.21 F =0.00 FT= 0 LT =2.21 6.948 PT -49,45 PF=11. 7 4 PE =(3.00 PT=61.19 K =0 06 V =3.36 C= 120.0 Per =5.63 PT =61.19 PF614.25 PE =0.66 PT=75.45 K =0.00 V =4.10 C 126.6 Pv =8.38 31 QN -0.66 D=35.05 32 QP= 372.43 L =0.58 F=0.00 FT =0 LT =0.58 14.881 PT -75.45 P =8.63 PE =0.00 PT= 84.68 K =0.06 V =6.43 C=120.0 Pv=20.68 32 QN=0.00 L =2.72 D =40.89 F =1.22 FT =F 33 QP= 445.13 LT =3.94 9. 774 PT=84.08 K=0.00 PF 38.51 V=5.65 PE =6.06 C =120.0 PT= 122.59 Pv= 15.95 171 JOB 'DAME.: Terrace Lodge FILE: E:1Justin Jobs \Terrace PIPE NODE FLOW DIA. No. No. / /min mm. Lodgel2nd floor calc. mdb LENGTH FRICTION m. kpa/m. PRESSURE kpa PAGE # 9 33 QN =0.00 31 D =40.89 34 QP= 445.13 L =0.10 F =2.44 FT =T LT =2.54 9.774 PT- 122.59 K =0.00 PF =24.81 V =5.65 PE =0.98 C =120.0 PT= 148.38 Pv =15.95 35 QN =94.19 32 D =26.65 36 QP= 94.20 L =0.47 F=0.61 FT=E LT =1.08 4.432 PT= 136,29 K =8.06 PF =4.79 V =2.81 PE= -4.61. C =120.0 PT =136.47 Pv =3.96 36 QN =0.00 33 D =26.65 37 QP =94.20 L =0.74 F =0.61 FT =E LT =1.35 4.432 PT= 136.47 K =0.00 PF -5.98 V =2.81 PE =0.00 C=120.0 PT= 142.45 Pv =3.96 34 37 QN =0.00 38 QP =94.20 D=26.65 L= 0.10 F =1.52 FT =T LT =1. 62 4.432 PT= 142.45 K =0.00 PF =7.20 V =2.81 ?E =0.98 C =120.0 PT =150.63 Pv =3.96 35 36 4 QN =0.00 D= 108.20 15 QP =93.48 L =1.50 F =0.00 FT =0 LT =1.50 0.005 PT= 148.29 K =0.00 PF =0.01 V=0.17 PE =0.00 C =120.0 PT =14 8.30 Pv =0.01 15 QN =0.00 34 QP= 356.65 D= 108.20 L =1.48 F=0.00 FT =0 LT1. 48 0.057 PT= 148.30 K =0.01 PF =0.08 V 0.65 PE =0.00 C =120.0 PT =148.38 Pv -0.21 J7 8 34 QN -0.00 D= 108.20 38 QP= 801.79 L =0.78 F =8.05 FT =T LT= 8.8 3 0.254 PT= 148.38 K =0.00 PF =2.25 V =1.45 PE =0.00 C =120.0 PT= 150.63 Pv=1.06 38 QN =0.00 40 QP= 895.99 40 QN =0.00 41 QE= 895.99 D= 108.20 L =39.35 F=1. 61 FT =S. LT =40.96 0.312 PT= 150.63 K =0.00 PF =12.80 V=1.62 PE =0.00 C =120.0 PT =163.42 Pit =1.32 D= 108.20 L =28.12 F =4.02 FT =E LT =32.14 0.312 PT= 163.42 K =0.00 PF410.04 V=1,62 PE =0.00 C =120.0 PT =173.47 Pv =1.32 41 QN =0.00 D= 108.20 42 QP =895.99 L =3.50 F =1.61 FT =S LT =5.11 0.312 PT= 173.47 K =0.00 PF =1.60 V =1.62 PE =0.00 C =120.0 PT= 175.06 Pv =1.32 172 JOB NAME: Terrace Lodge FILE: E:\Justin Jobs\Terrace Lodge\2nd floor calc.mdb PIPE NODE FLOW DIA. LENGTH FRICTION No, No. 1/min mm. m. kpa /m, PRESSURE kpa PAGE #•10. 42 ON=0.00 D= 108.20 43 QP =895.99 L =2.00 F =8.05 FT =T LT =10.05 0.312 PT= 175.06 K =0.00 PF =3.14 V =1.62 PE =0.00 C=120.0 PT= 178,20 Pv =1.32 39 QN =0.00 43 QP =0.00 L =5.48 D=108.20 F=8.05 0.000 FT =T LT =13.53 PT= 178.20 K=0.00 PF =0.00 V =0.00 PE -0.00 C= 120.0 PT= 378.20 Pv =0.00 43 QN =0.00 D= 108.20 44 0= 895.99 L=2.88 F=8.85 FT=BE LT =11.73 0.312 PT= 178.20 K =0.00 PF=3.66 V=1.62 PE =0.00 C =120.0 PT=181.87 Pv =1.32 44 QN =0.00 D= 108.20 45 QP= 895.99 L =5.35 F=4.02 FT=E LT =9.37 0.312 PT= 181.87 l<==0.00 PF =2193 V =1.62 PE=52.45 C =120.0 PT=237.24 Pv =1.32 45 ,0=0.00 L=2.01 D =108.20 F =4.02 0.312 FT =E 46 QP =895.99 LT =6.03 PT=237.24 K =0.00 PF=1.88 V =1.62 PE=0.00 C-120.0 PT =2 3 9.12 Pv =1.32 46 QN =0.00 47 • QP= 895.99 L -6.95 D =108.20 F=4.02 0.312 FT =E LT =10.97 PT239.12 K =0.00 PF =3.43 V =1.62 PE=0.00 0120.0 PT =242.55 Pv =1.32 47 QN =0.00 L =3.64 D= 108.20 F =1.61 0.312 FT =S 48 QP= 895.99 LT =5.25 PT =242.55 K=0.00 PF =1.64 V =1.62 PE -0.40 C =120.0 PT=244.19 Pv =1.32 48 QN =0.40 D= 108.20 49 QP= 895.99 L =6.69 F =1, 61 FT =S LT =8.30 0.312 PT =244.19 K =0.00 PF=2.59 V=1.62 PE =O.00 C =120.0 PT=246.78 Pv=1.32 49 0=0.00 L =7.95 D =108.20 F =4.02 0.312 FT=E 50 QP =895.99 LT =11.97 PT- 246.78 K =0.00 PF=3.74 V =1.62 PE=0.00 C =120.0 PT =250.52 Pv=1.32 50 QN =0.00 L =5.44 D= 108.20 F =4.02 FT =E 51 QP= 895.99 LT =9.46 0.312 PT= 250.52 K =0.00 PF=2.96 V =1.62 PE =0.00 C=120.0 PT= 253.48 Pv =1.32 173 JOB NAME: Terrace Lodge FILE: E:\Justin Jobs\Terrace Lodge/2nd floor calc.mdb PIPE NODE FLOW DIA. LENGTH FRICTION PRESSURE No. No. 1/min mm. m. kpa/m. kpa PAGE # 11 51 51 QN 0.00 L=6.47 D=108.20 F=4.02 0.312 FT=E 52 U=895.99 LT=10.49 PT-253.48 X=0.00 Pn-3.28 V=1.62 PE=0.00 C=120.0 PT=256.76 Pv=1.32 52 QN-0.00 52 D=108.20 53 QP=895.99 L=1.00 F=4.02 FT-E LT-5.02 0.312 PT=256.76 X=0.00 PF-1.57 V=1.62 PE=0.00 C=120.0 PT=258.32 Pv=1.32 53 0=0.00 53 D=108.20 54 QP=895.99 L=1.80 F=0.00 FT=0 LT=1.80 0.312 PT=258.32 K=0.00 PF=0.56 V=1.62 PE=17.65 C=120.0 PT=276.53 Pv=1.32 54 QN=0.00 54 D=108.20 55 OP=895.99 L=1.50 F=16,84 FT=ABT LT=18.34 0.312 PT=276.53 X=0.00 PF=5.73 V=1.62 PE=8.73 C=120.0 PT=290.99 Pv=1.32 55 0=0.00 55 D=161.47 56 QP=895.99 L-(1.91 F-I1.52 FT=T LT=12.43 0.044 PT=290.99 X=0.00 PF-0.55 V=0.73 PE0.00 C=120.0 PT=291.54 Pv=0.27 56 QN=378.54 56 D-161.47 57 QP=1274.54 L=0. 61 F-0.00 FT=Fe4 LT=0.61 0.029 PT=291.54 X=0.00 PF=4.00 V-1.04 PE=5.98 C=120.0 PT-301.54 Pv=0.54 i7 57 QN=0.00 L=40.57 D=159.51 F=20.17 0.068 FT=LTG 58 QP=1274.54 LT=60.74 PT-301.54 X=0.00 PF=4.14 V=1.06 PE=2.94 C=140.0 PT=308.62 Pv=0.56 174 {EGEND ▪ Standard 45 degree elbow Standard 90 degree elbow • Long turn degree elbow Standard tee • Butterfly valve • Gate valve • Check valve Alarm valve • Dry pipe valve • Deluge valve • Pre - action valve • Back flow preventer .x = Constant pressure x in KPa for fitting F PAGE #;. ON = Normal flow discharge QP = Flow; in; pipe D = Pipe inside diameter L = Pipe length F = Fitting equivalence FT — Fitting type LT = Total length PT P. Total node pressure PF Pressure friction loss PE = Pressure elevation loss K = Sprinkler K- factor V = Velocity C C-- factor PV Velocity pressure SIGNIFICANT HYDRAULICAL NOTES :ximum velocity of 6.43 M /SEC at pipe 29 3st remote sprinkler Q node 18 175• D.T.S. Terrace Lodge Functional Report Appendix B Preliminary Storm Water Analysis 176 D.T.S. Terrace Lodge Functional Report STORMWATER MANAGEMENT ANALYSIS FOR A SITE CLIENT: TERRACE LODGE LOCATION: 475 TALBOT ST EAST IDF STATION: AYLMER SITE INFORMATION Roof Area Paved Area Gravel Area Landscaped Area Overall Area SIZING OF ORIFICE 5 YEAR PRE- DEVELOPMENT Number of Subcatchment Areas: 1 This Analysis is for Subcatchment Area No. 1 * Note: If roofed area is controlled by drain restrictors do not enter roof information below. AREA 1 RUNOFF COEFFICIENT (m2) 2664.5 0.94 7200.5 0.96 0 0.75 43421 0.20 53286 0.34 Allowable Release Rate from Site (Us): Total Allowable Release Rate= 399.60 Release Rate from Roof= 0.00 Allowable Release from Other Areas= 399.60 A = Q /(C * (square root of 2gh)) Shape coefficient, C = 0.60 Total head on orifice (m), h = 0.60 Then A (cm "2) = 1941.1 And the required diameter of the orifice (cm) = 49.7 DETERMINATION OF NECESSARY STORAGE VOLUME Modified Rational Method used to determine storage volume: Q= 2.78CIA Use a 15 minute Entry time for the flow into the pipe and the Yarnell's 5 -year storm curve 5 YEAR RETURN PERIOD I= 2464/t +16 = AREA 1 TIME (MIN.) i (mm /hr) INFLOW (m3 /sec) ACCUM , RUNOFF VOL. (m3) ALLOWABLE RELEASE VOL. (m3) REQ'D STORAGE (m3) 15 79.48 0.400 359.7 359.7 0.0 20 68.44 0.344 413.0 479.5 -66.5 25 60.10 0.302 453.3 599.4 -146.1 30 53.57 0.269 484.8 719.3 -234.5 177 D.T.S. Terrace Lodge Functional Report STORMWATER MANAGEMENT ANALYSIS FOR A SITE CLIENT: TERRACE LODGE LOCATION: 475 TALBOT ST EAST IDF STATION: AYLMER SITE INFORMATION Roof Area Paved Area Gravel Area Landscaped Area Overall Area SIZING OF ORIFICE 5 YEAR POST - DEVELOPMENT Number of Subcatchment Areas: 1 This Analysis is for Subcatchment Area No. 1 * Note: If roofed area is controlled by drain restrictors do not enter roof information below. AREA 1 (m2) RUNOFF COEFFICIENT 10566 0.94 9393 0.96 0 0.75 33327 0.20 53286 0.48 Allowable Release Rate from Site (Us): Total Allowable Release Rate= 399.60 Release Rate from Roof= 0.00 Allowable Release from Other Areas= 399.60 A = Q /(C * (square root of 2gh)) Shape coefficient, C = 0.60 Total head on orifice (m), h = 0.60 Then A (cm "2) = 1941.1 And the required diameter of the orifice (cm) = 49.7 DETERMINATION OF NECESSARY STORAGE VOLUME Modified Rational Method used to determine storage volume: Q= 2.78CIA Use a 15 minute time of concentration for the flow into the pipe and the Yarnell's 5 -year storm curve 5 YEAR RETURN PERIOD I= 2464/t +16 = AREA 1 TIME (MIN.) (mm /hr) INFLOW (m3 /sec) ACCUM , RUNOFF VOL. (m3) ALLOWABLE RELEASE VOL. (m3) REQ'D STORAGE (m3) 15 20 25 30 35 40 79.48 68.44 60.10 53.57 48.31 44.00 0.566 0.487 0.428 0.381 0.344 0.313 509.0 584.4 641.4 686.0 721.9 751.4 178 359.7 479.5 599.4 719.3 839.2 959.0 149.3 104.9 42.0 -33.3 -117.3 -207.7 D.T.S. Terrace Lodge Functional Report STORMWATER MANAGEMENT ANALYSIS FOR A SITE CLIENT: TERRACE LODGE LOCATION: 475 TALBOT ST EAST IDF STATION: AYLMER SITE INFORMATION Roof Area Paved Area Gravel Area Landscaped Area Overall Area SIZING OF ORIFICE 100 YEAR POST - DEVELOPMENT Number of Subcatchment Areas: 1 This Analysis is for Subcatchment Area No. 1 * Note: If roofed area is controlled by drain restrictors do not enter roof information below. AREA 1 (m2) RUNOFF COEFFICIENT 2664.5 0.94 7200.5 0.96 0 0.75 43421 0.20 53286 0.34 Allowable Release Rate from Site (Us): Total Allowable Release Rate= 764.7 Release Rate from Roof= 0.0 Allowable Release from Other Areas= 764.7 A = Q /(C * (square root of 2gh)) Shape coefficient, C = 0.60 Total head on orifice (m), h = 0.60 Then A (cm "2) = 3714.6 And the required diameter of the orifice (cm) = 68.8 DETERMINATION OF NECESSARY STORAGE VOLUME Modified Rational Method used to determine storage volume: Q= 2.78CIA Use a 15 minute time of concentration for the flow into the pipe and the Yarnell's storm curve 100 YEAR RETURN PERIOD i= 2317.4/(T + 11) 4.836 179 AREA 1 TIME (MIN.) i (mm /hr) INFLOW (m3 /sec) ACCUM , RUNOFF VOL. (m3) ALLOWABLE RELEASE VOL. (m3) REQ'D STORAGE (m3) 15 152.08 0.765 688.2 688.2 0.0 20 131.29 0.660 792.2 917.6 -125.5 25 115.86 0.583 873.8 1147.0 -273.2 30 103.92 0.523 940.6 1376.4 -435.9 35 94.39 0.475 996.7 1605.8 -609.2 40 86.59 0.435 1044.9 1835.3 -790.3 45 80.08 0.403 1087.1 2064.7 -977.5 50 74.55 0.375 1124.6 2294.1 - 1169.5 179 D.T.S. Terrace Lodge Functional Report STORMWATER MANAGEMENT ANALYSIS FOR A SITE CLIENT: TERRACE LODGE LOCATION: 475 TALBOT ST EAST IDF STATION: AYLMER SITE INFORMATION Roof Area Paved Area Gravel Area Landscaped Area Overall Area SIZING OF ORIFICE 100 YEAR POST - DEVELOPMENT Number of Subcatchment Areas: 1 This Analysis is for Subcatchment Area No. 1 * Note: If roofed area is controlled by drain restrictors do not enter roof information below. AREA 1 (m2) RUNOFF COEFFICIENT 2664.5 0.94 7200.5 0.96 0 0.75 43421 0.20 53286 0.34 Allowable Release Rate from Site (Us): Total Allowable Release Rate= 764.7 Release Rate from Roof= 0.0 Allowable Release from Other Areas= 764.7 A = Q /(C * (square root of 2gh)) Shape coefficient, C = 0.60 Total head on orifice (m), h = 0.60 Then A (cm "2) = 3714.6 And the required diameter of the orifice (cm) = 68.8 DETERMINATION OF NECESSARY STORAGE VOLUME Modified Rational Method used to determine storage volume: Q= 2.78CIA Use a 15 minute time of concentration for the flow into the pipe and the Yarnell's storm curve 100 YEAR RETURN PERIOD i= 2317.4/(T + 11) 4.836 180 AREA 1 TIME (MIN.) i (mm /hr) INFLOW (m3 /sec) ACCUM , RUNOFF VOL. (m3) ALLOWABLE RELEASE VOL. (m3) REQ'D STORAGE (m3) 15 152.08 0.765 688.2 688.2 0.0 20 131.29 0.660 792.2 917.6 -125.5 25 115.86 0.583 873.8 1147.0 -273.2 30 103.92 0.523 940.6 1376.4 -435.9 35 94.39 0.475 996.7 1605.8 -609.2 40 86.59 0.435 1044.9 1835.3 -790.3 45 80.08 0.403 1087.1 2064.7 -977.5 50 74.55 0.375 1124.6 2294.1 - 1169.5 180 Terrace Lodge Proposed New 100 Bed Long -Term Care Home Appendix `F' Food Service Schematic Design Documents '; � 1 AF 1-illICT Schematic Design Report 181 MAIN KITCHEN - GROUND FLOOR Lu°- 8 au) 2,+0_ ,4r FOODSERVICE EQUIPMENT PLAN g 8 c g 8 8 gh 88, 8E8 8E8 8 8 g 8 E 8 8 8 gh 8E1, 8E8 8EEE' E ;8 2 2 V . 8 E i 8 8 EIS EEE E E . 8 E 8 8 81E = . = .. = „ . e .. — F 22 22 rj, ' 2 , 5 2 = = .,.■ .,.■ .,.■ „ , ,.. .:.■ .,.■ .,.■ .,.■ ... 2 .'"' _, ... ... Lu°- 8 au) 2,+0_ ,4r FOODSERVICE EQUIPMENT PLAN 2 GROUND FLOOR RESIDENT SERVERY PLAN (NORTH SURGERY) D uJ 2,41 Terrace Lodge Proposed New 100 Bed Long -Term Care Home Appendix `G' Class `C' Estimate 184 Schematic Design Report Marcos Sibal Director Haneef Ahmed Associate Director Turner & Townsend One St. Clair Avenue East Seventh Floor Toronto Ontario M4T 2V7 To si t: +1 (416)925 1424 e: marcos.sibal @turntown.com e: haneef.ahmed @turntown.com w: www.turntown.com Report for Class C Design Cost Analysis Terrace Lodge LTC Expansion - Alymer, ON MMMC Architects Inc 185 Dec 15th 2014 ref no. 21084 MMMC Architects Inc. Brantford Studio - 127 Brant Road, Brantford Ontario N3T 3H5 For the attention of Mr. Dwight Lander, Dear Dwight, TERRACE LODGE LTC EXPANSION CLASS C COST ANALYSIS We enclose our Class C Design Cost Analysis for the above -noted based on the documentation provided to us, listed in Section 4 of this report. Please refer to our Executive Summary, Section 1, for specific qualifications and assumptions associated with this cost report. We trust this meets with your approval. Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact us. Yours truly Haneef Ahmed Marcos Sibal Associate Director Director Turner & Townsend. Turner & Townsend. e: haneef.ahmed @turntown.com e: marcos.sibal @turntown.com 21`816 MMMC Architects Inc Terrace Lodge LTC Expansion - Alymer, ON Contents 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 ELEMENTAL ESTIMATE 3 AREA ANALYSIS AND GRAPHICS 4 DOCUMENTATION Rev 0 Originator Haneef Ahmed /Michelle Lau Approved Marcos Sibal Date Dec 15th, 2014 © Turner & Townsend. All rights reserved December 14. This document is expressly provided to and solely for the use of MMMC Architects Inc. and must not be quoted from, referred to, used by or distributed to any other party without the prior consent of Turner & Townsend who accept no liability of whatsoever nature for any use by any other party. F: \TOR\JOBS \2014 JOBS - 20860 - \21084 CM - TERRACE LODGE LONG TERM CARE - MS \REPORT \21084 TERRACE LODGE LTC - CLASS C COST REPORT.DOC making the difference MMMC Architects Inc Terrace Lodge LTC Expansion — Alymer, ON 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.1 Introduction Turner and Townsend are retained to provide Cost Planning & Design Cost Control services for the proposed expansion of the Terrace Lodge Long Term Care Facility including this report for a Class C Design Cost Analysis. The Estimate is for the "hard" Construction Cost component of the project only and does not include for any project soft costs. This estimate is an opinion of probable cost only. 1.2 Procurement and Schedule The Construction Cost Estimate includes all direct construction costs and contractor's overhead and profit. It assumes that the project will be procured on a Stipulated Lump sum basis, and that bids will be received from a minimum of five pre - qualified general contractors. We also assume that the project will be completed in a reasonable time frame and have not included any premiums required for "fast- tracking" the project. 1.3 Risk Assessment Post - Contract Contingency (i.e. for Change Orders that may arise during construction) has been included in our cost report at 5% of Construction Cost. 1.4 Level of Documentation The estimate is based on the drawings and information provided as listed in Section 4 of this report and supplemented by discussions with the Consultants. It reflects current (Dec 2014) rates and present market /local conditions. The estimate includes an Estimating /Design Contingency Allowance to account for increases in cost as a result of design development through to 100% complete documentation. 1.5 Market Conditions The estimate is based on normal competitive conditions and is intended to fall within a range of bids received from a number of competitive contractors. Adverse local and global market conditions, proprietary specifications, single- sourcing of materials and equipment, or lack of bidders may cause bids to vary from reasonable estimates based on normal competitive conditions. Construction price escalation has been included based on a January 2016 construction start. making the difference 41c$$1 MMMC Architects Inc Terrace Lodge LTC Expansion — Alymer, ON 1.6 Assumptions /Exclusions Please refer to Page 6 for specific Exclusions and to our detailed elemental back -up for specific assumptions. 1.7 Limitation of Scope Turner & Townsend has been retained to provide only a Class C estimate at this time. Any additional services, such as preparation of a bid /tender analysis, providing assistance in Value Engineering initiatives, preparation of a pre- tender estimate based on 100% contract documents etc., are not included in our scope of services. making the difference 51391 Project: 21084 Revision 1 Date: January 5, 2015 TERRACE LODGE LTC CLASS C ESTIMATE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Turner & Townsend. Description GFA (SF) $ /SF Estimated Cost A CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE 1 Building and Site Development 85,111 $260 $22,113,000 2 Design/ Estimating Contingency - 8% INCLUDED 3 Escalation to Jan 2016 - 3% $663,000 4 Post Contract ( construction ) Contingency - 5% $1,139,000 Subtotal A $23,915,000 B Cash Allowances - to be confirmed (Not included in A Above) 1 Kitchen Equipment $1,000,000 2 Laundry Equipment $100,000 3 Testing and Inspection $100,000 4 Nurse Call - Budget provided by Owner $255,000 5 Phone, TV, CTV, WiFi, Door Controls - Budget provided by Owner $525,000 6 Wanderguard - Budget provided by Owner $10,000 Subtotal B $1,990,000 A +B Total Estimated Construction Cost excluding HST) 85,111 $304 $25,905,000 61 Project: 21084 Revision 1 Date: January 5, 2015 TERRACE LODGE LTC CLASS C ESTIMATE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Exclusions The following has been specifically Excluded: 1 HST 2 All Project Soft Costs 3 Professional Consultant Fees 4 Permits and Development Charges 5 Furniture, Furnishings and Equipment (i.e. Beds, Bedroom closets, etc.) 6 Legal Fees 7 Project Management Fees 8 Administration Expenses 9 Moving and Relocation Cost 10 Security equipment, device & wiring 11 Communications racks, patch panels & cabling 12 Communications active hardware 13 Nurse Call equipment, device & wiring 14 Public Address equipment, device & wiring 15 Intercom /Enterphone system 16 A/V system 17 Patient wandering system 18 Clock System 19 Lightning protection 20 Window Treatment, i.e. Blinds 21 Fitness /Activity Equipment 22 Hydrotherapy Equipment, if any 23 Interior Signage and Graphics 24 Projection Screen 25 Patient Lifts 26 Upgrades to Existing Services Turner &Townsend. MMMC Architects Inc Terrace Lodge LTC Expansion - Alymer, ON 2 ELEMENTAL ESTIMATE 81 Turn n 'd making the difference ELEMENTAL STSUMMARY CLASS C ESTIMATE Project: Terrace Lodge LTC Location: Aylmer, ON Owner /Client: Elgin County Project Architect: MMMC Architects Inc Gross • Turner Teannsend ML /HA -C- RO Dec 15 2014 21084 7,907 m2 Cat: File: Date: Number: Floor Area: Ratio Elemental Elemental Elemental Element to GFA Quantity Unit Rate Amount Cost /m2 Amount A SHELL Al SUBSTRUCTURE $139.12 All Foundation 0.92 7,297 m2 $137.32 $1,002,000 $126.72 Al2 Basement Excavation 0.38 2,980 m3 $32.89 $98,000 $12.39 $1,100,000 5% A2 STRUCTURE $298.09 A21 Lowest Floor Construction 0.92 7,297 m2 $62.22 $454,000 $57.42 A22 Upper Floor Construction 0.08 610 m2 $263.93 $161,000 $20.36 A23 Roof Construction 0.92 7,297 m2 $238.73 $1,742,000 $220.31 $2,357,000 11% A3 EXTERIOR ENCLOSURE $440.37 A31 Walls Below Grade 0.05 411 m2 $459.85 $189,000 $23.90 A32 Walls Above Grade 0.26 2,064 m2 $327.52 $676,000 $85.49 A33 Windows & Entrances 0.12 987 m2 $831.91 $821,000 $103.83 A34 Roof Covering 0.92 7,297 m2 $182.27 $1,330,000 $168.21 A35 Projections 1.00 7,907 m2 $58.94 $466,000 $58.94 $3,482,000 16% B INTERIORS B1 PARTITIONS & DOORS $231.57 B11 Partitions 1.24 9,840 m2 $124.90 $1,229,000 $155.43 B12 Doors 0.06 504 No $1,194.44 $602,000 $76.14 $1,831,000 8% B2 FINISHES $164.92 B21 Floor Finishes 0.93 7,328 m2 $84.88 $622,000 $78.66 B22 Ceiling Finishes 0.93 7,328 m2 $58.13 $426,000 $53.88 B23 Wall Finishes 2.59 20,488 m2 $12.50 $256,000 $32.38 $1,304,000 6% B3 FITTINGS & EQUIPMENT $185.28 B31 Fittings & Fixtures 1.00 7,907 m2 $107.12 $847,000 $107.12 B32 Equipment 1.00 7,907 m2 $68.67 $543,000 $68.67 B33 Conveying Systems 0.00 2 stp $37,500.00 $75,000 $9.49 $1,465,000 7% C SERVICES Cl MECHANICAL $449.98 C11 Plumbing & Drainage 1.00 7,907 m2 $127.73 $1,010,000 $127.73 C12 Fire Protection 1.00 7,907 m2 $46.16 $365,000 $46.16 C13 H.V.A.C. 1.00 7,907 m2 $234.98 $1,858,000 $234.98 C14 Controls 1.00 7,907 m2 $41.10 $325,000 $41.10 $3,558,000 16% C2 ELECTRICAL $239.28 C21 Service & Distribution 1.00 7,907 m2 $65.76 $520,000 $65.76 C22 Lighting, Devices & Heating 1.00 7,907 m2 $126.22 $998,000 $126.22 C23 Systems & Ancillaries 1.00 7,907 m2 $47.30 $374,000 $47.30 $1,892,000 9% NET BUILDING COST (Excluding Site) $2,148.60 $16,989,000 77% D SITE & ANCILLARY WORK D1 SITE WORK $205.51 D11 Site Development 2.31 18,234 m2 $49.19 $897,000 $113.44 D12 Mechanical Site Services 2.31 18,234 m2 $25.01 $456,000 $57.67 D13 Electrical Site Services 2.31 18,234 m2 $14.92 $272,000 $34.40 $1,625,000 7% D2 ANCILLARY WORK $0.00 D21 Demolition 0.00 0 m2 $0.00 $0 $0.00 D22 Alterations 0.00 0 m2 $0.00 $0 $0.00 $0 0% NET BUILDING COST (Including Site) $2,354.12 $18,614,000 Z GENERAL REQUIREMENTS & ALLOWANCES Z1 GEN. REQ. & FEE 10.0% $235.36 Z11 General Requirements 8.0% $1,489,000 $188.31 Z12 Fee 2.0% $372,000 $47.05 $1,861,000 8% TOTAL CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE (Excluding Allowances) $20,475,000 93% Z2 ALLOWANCES 8.0% $207.16 Z21 Estimating Allowance 8.0% $1,638,000 $207.16 Z22 Escalation Allowance 0.0% See Executive Summary $0 $0.00 Z23 Construction Allowance 0.0% See Executive Summary $0 $0.00 $1,638,000 7% GOOD & SERVICES TAX 0.0% EXCLUDED $0 $0.00 $0 0% TOTAL CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE (Including Allowances) $22,113,000 100% Cost /m2 GFA 7,907 m2 $2,797 GFA 85,111 sf $260 Beds 104 no sf /bed 81,,,1,74 cost /bed $212,625 1 JJ MMMC Architects Inc Terrace Lodge LTC Expansion - Alymer, ON Turn ; d 3 AREA ANALYSIS AND GRAPHICS making the difference 4€1g41 Project 21084 December 04 2014 Terrace Lodge Long Term Care AREA SUMMARY Is! Tuurnr &To nd Above Grade Enclosed (m2) Void (m2) GFA (m2) GFA (sf) Per. (m) Main 7,297 0 7,297 78,545 830 Below Grade Basement 610 0 610 6,566 121 Total 7,907 0 7,907 85,111 951 Optional Link 26 0 26 280 25 Total 26 0 26 280 25 Net Active Files Adult Day Prog Beauty Bedroom Business Office Cart Celebration Chapel Chart Cold Room Conference Den Dining Director Doc Equip ES Supply Exercise Gardening General Office General Store Great Room HSKP ]an Kitchen Large Program Rm Laundry Library Lockers Lunch Counter Maint Off Med Meeting Meeting /Lunch MOW MSS Nurse Private Dining /Board Rm RAI RCC Rec Receiving Residences RHA Kitchen Seating Servery Shower Small Program Rm Staff Development Staff Lounge Storage Sunroom Therapy Visitors Waiting Lounge Workroom Workshop WR/Bath 12 24 33 17 50 5 37 58 44 9 44 114 317 22 21 40 33 51 26 12 17 111 20 6 206 45 149 47 24 19 11 28 13 8 14 20 56 43 11 13 26 87 1420 38 62 76 40 28 42 54 556 140 10 305 41 14 58 616 Circulation Corridor 1563 Service Corridor 128 Stair 56 Vestibule 33 Mech & Elec Elec M E 10 95 5,443 1,780 105 Walls & Shafts 579 Total 7,907 Af}tll `'I 114ry Grossing Factor Net Circulation Mech & Elec Walls & Shafts Total 5,443 100% 1,780 33% 105 2% 579 11% 7,907 145% Site Count Private Standard Semi- Private 24 no 40 no 40 no wmh Terrace Lodge Long Term Care U 3 M M M Architects � @ Cl, t O E $ c::!1 \ C U \ e E U \ O \ � E 0 - L Q t / O E , -c 0 � U U wm6V Terrace Lodge Long Term Care M M M Architects wmG December 4, 2014 0 2 E - k Terrace Lodge Long Term Care co 3 M M M Architects @ $ @ t E O \ C \ e E U 0 - \ O \ � E Q) 0 Q L- A., a U, c: O E , -c 0 � U U MMMC Architects Inc Terrace Lodge LTC Expansion - Alymer, ON 4 DOCUMENTATION 1 2 3 4 5 Document Architectural SD3.1 - SD 3.18 Structural System Brief Mechanical & Electrical Services Schematic Design Report #1 Electrical Drawings E0.1 - E4.0 Foodservice Equip Plans & Services K1 & K2 Prepared by MMMC Architects MMMC Architects Millennium Engineering Millennium Engineering Van Velzen + Radchenko Design Associates Ltd. 51891 Dated Nov 27, 2014 Nov 27, 2014 Nov 6, 2014 Dec 2, 2014 Oct 30, 2014 Date Received Nov 27, 2014 Nov 27, 2014 Dec 3, 2014 Dec 3, 2014 Nov 27, 2014 making the difference r rift a 1111111111111111111111111111 1 4 ham nammum lr IIII111 , Ri U •L a> 0 N `''1fl7uj 1 11 . 15,A,r;;;: onlp witus mow Mum IIII�, J�IVf� • 11 U U RI- 0 111111 111111111111111111111111111 IIIII1IIIIIIIIIIIIIII111111M N O N 11111111,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1 • 0 0 Kg; h11,, Cr) CN 1 lifik 111 kook 6 mem egeta IIII, �J�Illf� s+' t4: Lol t — t- 11— 111— Q ■11 LI E t — c uua 11111 — t- 16— 1111111111111 O N Iri','''1fl7uj Rona uG VIIIIVIII 1111111111.1i 11 II • "00.0,0 „Du.J pl 1111111 • IIII�, J�Illf� LC) Q N Imp whihm mb • Ilia: uilit Huwsssu ham !J u • • �wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww ■ LT- co 01 Total Council Driven Total External Factors 0 P2 [ C4 0 WEB W Total Tax Decrease /(Increase) above 4% target increase in Tax Rate a Q N tie/ 0 Tam. itniikor Nee 31gnn RNA • IIII�, J�IVlr r w 0.. o Ill ■ ®L co co '18 &I 2 16. 1 1 1 ti 0 N ''1fl7uj 1 um 11. rrr�ry isymwmo ,_ tr IIII�, J�Illlr 1 C '474 L W 1 00 O N 0 rri','''i(l7uj k RAO al A rd Oraj r. • .................. .r, WINO Lam kmin egniaarealas WNW III trm 1 r... o 2014 Op /cap Performance 1 [; Equity /Salary Review 1 Other Depart. Efficiencies Total Staff Driven Efficicrtcy Target r 0) Q N 1 114."11,1"41 0 01 0 CD 0) ...... Total Council Driven Total External Factors 1 Total Tax Decrease /(Increase) above 4% target increase in Tax Rate PIO �mtmt� SY Wall A PagTe gji gikalarge NOM 4� >� H III IIII�, J�IVf� 111 111111111,1,1,1,1, 11111 V • 0 Ce) 141 O O O N M O O O CO1 1 LO CN Ceis 1 co a9 a' 0 cu zoo- f A a2 E E41"1 3 rY� 1 in O ra U N 1 migua SS parm Emma 14 nnnnnne 01111 14.4 nom aihnis „ff la rgijzzotA I")))/A 630 uh iii IIII�, J�IVf� 11111111111 0 0 3 �i c 0 0 CD .0 C1 . Q c Q C 0 0} • co IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIII • cp 0 W cp cp N_ N rri','''i(l7uj 1 1 1' . Pei Itk 1111 111 1 IL o o [Ai Oi taN taN 46 (el) g ■ 01 0 ■ -.6" -g „c 13, 0...... .a. 03 -0 - tu m 0 _ c o w (,) 01 0) ■ a to 0 ? co L. (..) 0 g 1..ct w " 0) f btIL T/L finance over 25 years vs 10 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII 1 1111111111111111111111111111111 1''1fl7uj 1 11111 11111 1 OrrialIMMOINOM '4114 11112 1111111 giA r01:171; LL 11111111111111111111111111111111111 0 0 1 111111111,1,1,1,1, 11111 O O O O O O {a CO 1■ O O O O O LO Lc) N— co N. M O CO IIIIIIII gams Ewa ve FWD Maim 111 trriA O O O CO 7 f` CO OCO O0 LO d) O O CO N N O M D ) 0-) 0-) c mm wm c) N L O a) _ �, N Z •5 t v U N m 0 c (6 c m , N a; u) u) •X ru a Q •(6 w •— E 2 cp..— TO as 0 W - _ 0_ RS n I° CO 0 Museum /Accessibility Needs uuuu1 u1uuuuuuuu1 • 1 fier was 11 A inmmnmiy p WWI ti .............:... IIII�, J�IVf� 0 0 0 0 0000 O 0 01 CO CO NN L Building envelope HVAC (Cooling) Interior Renovations Lower Level Washrooms Asbestos removal N E TDi U z (6 (6 N cp- O 0 D c c.1 co N 1 WSW imiggigt arS IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII ORR ........... 11112 1111111 , Ei z -0 E 112 0 co 0) 0) 0) • 0) L 0) • 0 :1-P • . ° ■ 0 . E z 0 a) 0 ■ 0 z ti N `''1fl7uj 1 I 0 1111111!!!!!!!!!!!! Rag .I 0 •- •- a) • 0 • • Q (i) LPi -47. co L 4-1 > a► ma 0 0 0 _c � Q 15 '1 c .— 4.+ L 471 0 mC mimp • ■ - .Q 0 0 CL 0 cC 0 D. 1. 0 Q LEI �•+ Q c (1) 0 0 4-+ ■ — .— E E • ©► 0 0 00 N rri','''i(l7uj 1111111!!!!!!!!!!!! Il�r IIII111 , FA wan ■▪ + • 0 1 Lw% 0 •. 4-• gm. •_ zo, Q L L o (I) Q . 471 0 .c 4-+ 0) • Q 0) N `''1fl7uj 1 1111111!!!!!!!!!!!! chef .._ uu� J,+lu�r • _ • • 0 ti.); c . . 0 ImIge • . - . — • 4.?1% E .- .— L p CD • . •- s0 (0 c7.) N • E (") CO Q) Q N N 1 1 a • 11111111111111 co co co O N N Cost Estimates ncrementa L N 0 0 O m IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 11111111111 III II 11111111 I O N L ccp 1 irj cz z 0 Cr) CJ au 1111111111111111111 1 N N rri','''i(l7uj PIO k�pp : 4L riliffiffiffh Wag A p W E PagTe Kiika irat max III IIII�: J�IVf� 1 ri CO rift 1 N ���� N tcwEc w co 01 cu -at CO Ct ct o co Z 4„,,- m§g`g g E 1 ger Crfisk Weis Isar. t' . IIII�, J�IVf� btIL Cr) N N `''1fl7uj 1 III 1111 I 1111111!!!!!!!!!!!! effro twm rrr: IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII■ EINEEEM 1 11�L Cv 0 el C■1 CO' CNII oal r 4�• ol 0 09 m J 0 • hum I) 01 ■ E o CL a,) o 0 E a_ _a 1 bEE 1 N N rri','''i(l7uj 1 1111111!!!!!!!!!!!! IIII�, ��IIIlr • ■ •- a tCo # OC N N rri','''i(l7uj